0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
61 visualizzazioni1 pagina
Rubric for synthesis paper on inclusive education C&t 4001 Fall 2015. Ideas are presented in a coherent, organized and logical manner. Ideas and arguments are clearly and convincingly stated. Paper offers several relevant implications (including suggestions for improvement) for everyday classroom / schooling practice.
Rubric for synthesis paper on inclusive education C&t 4001 Fall 2015. Ideas are presented in a coherent, organized and logical manner. Ideas and arguments are clearly and convincingly stated. Paper offers several relevant implications (including suggestions for improvement) for everyday classroom / schooling practice.
Rubric for synthesis paper on inclusive education C&t 4001 Fall 2015. Ideas are presented in a coherent, organized and logical manner. Ideas and arguments are clearly and convincingly stated. Paper offers several relevant implications (including suggestions for improvement) for everyday classroom / schooling practice.
Rubric for synthesis paper on inclusive education C&T 4001 Fall 2015
Organization/ Mechanics (5 points)
Clarity and relevance
of argument (10 points)
Supporting details (8 points)
Implications for practice (7 points)
All three components of
the assignment are addressed thoughtfully and reflect a sophisticated engagement with principles of inclusive pedagogy; Ideas are presented in a coherent, organized and logical manner; There are no mechanical errors.
Ideas/arguments are clearly
and convincingly stated; Arguments are supported by many references to relevant course readings; Citations reflect synthesis across many readings.
The paper provides
examples to effectively illustrate the ideas/arguments raised in the paper.
The paper offers
several relevant implications (including suggestions for improvement) for everyday classroom/schooling practice.
The paper addresses all
required components in both deep and surface ways. The organization of ideas may sometimes lack clarity; There are some mechanical errors.
Ideas and arguments are not
always clearly stated; Arguments are supported by some references to relevant course readings. Citations reflect familiarity with only few readings.
The paper includes some
examples, but connections to main arguments/ideas raised are weak.
The paper addresses all the
components of the assignment; The organizational structure is weak; There are several mechanical errors.
Ideas and arguments lack
clarity; Few references to course readings are made OR citations include many quotes but not enough synthesis.
Descriptive details are
rich and draw on a variety of personal experiences within schools.
The paper offers
some suggestions for improving classroom/schooling practice.
30-27
B 27-24
Some descriptive details
are offered; these draw on few personal experiences within schools.
The paper includes few,
if any, examples to illustrate the ideas/arguments raised in the paper. Examples offer thin descriptions of personal experiences within schools.
The paper offers few
indirect suggestions for improving classroom/schooling practice.