I-ABOR STAI\II}ARDS OUTLINE

ARELLANO UNTVERS*TY SCHOOL OF LAW

DEAN PORFIRIO DG.'PANGANIBAN, JR.
Labor Law in General
(Article r-6)

1.o1.

Labor Law Defined

Maternity Children's Hospital vs. Secretary of Labor { G.R. No. ZBgo9, June 3o, 1984}

1.o2.

l,aw Classification- See Books and Titles, Labor Code of the Philippines, P.D. No.

1.03.

Basis for Enactment- Constitution (1987)

Constitr-ttiona-l Basis: Art II, See-s 5,r8 andArt. r3, See. r

L.ot!.

Social Justice as the aim of Labor Laws

tto
A- A*^-,1^l
++1, N rurrLrIUUU

Calalang vs. Williams 7o P}r'il 726

1.oS.

Police Pou,er as the basis of Labor Laws

People vs. Vera Reyes 67 Phil rgo
Peoole vs. Pomar +6 Phil aSS

Phil Association of Service Exporters Inc vs. Drilon {G.R. No. 81958, June 3o, 1988}

1.06.

Principles of Underlying the Code

1.oT.

Significance of Foreign Decisions

Cerezo vs.

Atlantic Gulf and Pacific

Co. 33

1.o8.

Related l,au's

1.o9.

Labor l-aws and Social Economic Goals

1.1o.

Laborer's Welfare; Liberal Approach

Phil 425

Abella vs. National Labor Relations Commission {G.R. No. 7r8rz, July zo, r9B7}
Euro-Linea, Phils. Inc., vs. Nationai i,abor Reiations Commission {G.R. i.iO. 78782, Dec r,
19871

Manila Electric Companyvs. NLRC {G.R. No.78763, June rz,1988}

1.11. }{anagement

Rights

Sosito vs. Aguinaldo Development Corporation {G.R No. 489z6,Dec. 24, tg87}
Colgate Palmolive Philippires vs. Ople {G.R No. 7968t, June 3o, 1988}

Mendoza r-s. Rural Bank of Lucban {G.R No. r554zr, July

1.11.1

;.

zoo4}

Rjght to RoI
Gelmart Industries Phils., Inc. vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 55668, Aug. ro, 1989}

1.11.2 Right

to Prescribe Rules

Lagatic vs. NLRC {G.R. No. rzroo4, January 28, rg88}

China Banking Corporation vs. Borromeo {G.R. No. rg6g15, October tg, zoo4l
Associated W. atchmen "nd Securit\. I Tni^h Ic T rnfino {rl R No. L_!4Lrra, Feb 29, 196O)

1.11.3

Right to Select Employees

Pampanga Bus Company vs. Pambusco Employees Union 83 O.G. g8+

7.71.4 Right to

Transfer or Discharge Employees

Gregorio Araneta Employees vs. Roldan { G.R. No. L-68A6, July zo, 1955}
Phil. Steel Metal Workers Union vs. CIR { G.R. No. L-zoz8, April 28, 1949}
Tiong King vs. CIR { G.R. No. L-3S87, December zr, tg5r}
Roldan vs. Cebu Portland Cement Co. {G.R No. 24276-F., May zo, 196o}

Article 5: Rules and Regulations

Rizal Empire Insurance Group vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 73r4o, May 28, 1987}

'Philippine Association of Sen.ice Exporters vs. Drilon {G.R. No. 81958, June 3o, 1988}
CBTC Emplolers Union vs. Ciave {G.R. No. 4gS82,Jan.7,1986l

Article 6: Applicability
1.19.1 Government Co4rorations
National Housing Corporation vs. Jueo {r34 SCRA r7z}
National Service Corp vs. NLRC { L-6gB7o, November 29, tgBB}

t.Lg.2 Non- Applicability to Government Agencies

Republic vs. CA {G.R. No. 87676, Dec. zo, 1989}
Luzon Development Bank vs. Association vs. Association of Luzon Development Bank e.t.
ai {G.R. No. rzo3r9, Oct 6, rg95}
Social Security System Emplojzees Association vs. CA {G.R. No. 85279, July zg, r.gg9}

Emancipation of Tenants
(Article 7-rr)
1.1

Department of,Agrarian Reform

Association of Small Landowners of the Philippines vs. Secretary ofAgrarian Reform {G.R.
No.78742, July 14, 1989)
Acuna vs. Aroyo {G.R. No. Zggto, JuJy 4, 1989}
Pabico vs. Juico {G.R. No. Z9Z44,Ju1y 4. 1989}
Manaayvs. Juico {G.R. No.7977, July 14, 1989}

2.2 Lands Not Covered

Alita vs. CA {G.R. No. 78517, Feb 27, 1989}
GoRzalesvs. CAiG.R. i{o.362i3, june 29, r9E9i
Luz Farms vs. Secretary of DeparLment Agrarian Reform {G.R. No. 86889, Dec. 4, r99o}

Pre-Emplo].ment
(Article rz)

Rgcruitment and Placement

(Article ra)
Recruitment and Placement
People vs. Panis r4z SCRA 664 {1936}
People vs. Goce 247 SeRA 7Bo {rSSSi
Darvin vs. CA and People of the Philippines {G.R. No. rz5o44, July 13, r99g}

Overseas Employment
(Artic1e Lg_24)

*OEA
Cases under the

Jurisdiction of POEA

shipping Lines vs. POEA, Ministerof Labor and Employment, Hearing officer
Abdu Basar and Kathleen D. Saco {G.R No. 76658, Oct. 18, 1988}
PHIISAInternational Placementvs. Sec. of Labor {G.R No- r.o3r44, Apr. 4, zoor}
E-asJern

Cases not

in the Jurisdiction of POEA

PacificAsia Overseas Shipping Corp. vs. NLRC {G.R No. 76595, May 6, rggg}

Cases

under the Jurisdiction of NLRC

Millares and Lagdavs. NLRC
Tierra International Corporation v. s- NLR-C, et. Al {G.R. No. ror8z5, April z, tg96}
Dilan vs,. POEAAdministrator {G.R. No. 7956c., December 3, 19go}
Vinta Maritime Co. vs. NLRC and Basconcillo {G.R. No. rr39r, January 23, r99g}

R.A. 8o4z Migrant Workers Act

Marsaman Manning Agency vs. NLRC {G.R No. rz7r95, August 25, 1999}
Asian Center for Career and Employment Services vs. NLRC and Ibno Mediales {G.R No.
r3t656, October rz, 1998)
Athena Inter:national Manpower Servtces Inc. y s. Villauos {G.R.No. r54o3, April 15, zoo5}

Death and Other Benefits, Basis of Compensation

Eastern Shipping Lines vs. POEA 166 SCRAg3
Inter Ctrient Maritime Enierprises Inc. et ai vs. NLRC {G.R' No. rr5497, Sept. ro, r996i
Norse Management Corporation vs. National Seamen Board zt7 SCRA a86
NFD International Manning Agents vs., NLRC et. Al. {C.R. No. u6629, Jal. 16, t998}

Overseas Compensation Benefits in Dollars

Philippine International Shipping Corporation vs. NLRCig6 SCRA 6oS

Mc Kenzie vs. Cui {G.R. No. 4883r , Feb 6, r989i

Article zo: National Seamen Board

Viripn Shinninsqnd Marine Seruinps vs NI.RC rr< SCRA 01t

et'l a'-otec. SCRA qry: {.ts8q)
Suzara vs. Benipayo {G.R. No. S79gg}; Suzara vs. NLRC August 1, 1989

Invalid Side Agreement

Chavez vs. Bonto-Perez, Rayaia et. Ai. iG.R. No. ro98o8, March 1, 1995i

Reeulations of Recruitment and Placement Activities

(Article 25-99)
Cases under the

Jurisdiction of the POEA

Finman General Assurance vs. Innocencio {G.R. No. 9o273-7}Aov. 15, 1989}
Eastern Assurance and Surety Corp. vs. Sec ofLabor {G.R. No. 79496-bo, January

17,

1990)
Salazar vs. Achacoso and Marquez {G.R. No. Br5ro, March t4, r99o}

Article 34: Prohibited Practices

Soriano vs. Offshore Shipping and Marketing Corp. {G.R. No. 78409, Sept. 14, r9B9}
Seaguii irfaritime Corp vs. Baiaiongnan iG.R. No. 8zzgz, Feb. 28, 1989]

Article gS: Suspension and/or Cancellation of License or Authority

Catan vs. NLRC {G.R. No.77279, Apr. r5, rg88}

Solidary Liabilig assumed by Recruitment Agent

Royal Crowrr itternatiorrale vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 78o85, OcL 16, rg89i

Suability of a Foreign Corporation which hires Filipino Workers

Facilities Management Corp. vs. De La Osa 8q SCRA r3r {rgZg}

Article

38 : Il1ega1

Recruitrnent

People of the Phiiippines vs. Buiu Chowdry {G.R No. rzg577-8o, Februar_r- r5,
D^^-lDL:I:--:-^^
^f rLr ruptc Ul
lllE I rtlrlPplurs

People
People
People
People
People
People

zooz)
People
People
People
Ppnnle
People
People
People

tn n rT^
ra^-^L .Z ZUUIJ'
-.^
Vs. UdUalS
^^L^:^ 1U.^. llu. LZyU /U, rvlalUll IUr ^^^.1
vs. Flores {G.R. No. 138535-38, April 19, eoor}

of the Philippines
vs. Sagayado {G.R. No. tz467r-75, September

zooo}

zg,zooo}

vs. Benzon Ong {G.R. No. rr9595, January 18, zooo}

vs. Calonzo {G.R. Nos. 115150-55, September 27, tgg6}
vs. Hernandez {G.R. Nos. t4tzzr36, March 7, zooz}
vs. F. Hernandez, K. Reichl andY.G. de Reichl {G.R Nos. 14rzzr-96, March 7,
*Tommy

Tan" {G.R Nos. rzo835-4o, April ro, rg97}

vs. Tan Tiong Meng alias
vs. Arabia and Tomas {G.R. Nos. 13843r-36, September rz, eoor}
vs, Verano
nf the Philinnines vs F.snanol
of the Philippines vs. Roxas
of the Philippines vs. Remullo {G.R No. :12444936, June 6, zooe}
of the Philippines vs. S. Angeles {G.R. No. tZzJ76, April rr, zooz}

Employment of Non- ResidentAliens

(Article 4o)
Employrnent of }{on-Resident Aliens
Almodiel vs. NLRC et. Al. {G.R. No. roo64t, June 14, rg93}
General Milling Corporation vs. Tones {G.R No. 9S66, April zz, tggrl

Dee C. Chuan and Sons vs. Court of Industrial Relations 8S Phil 43r, January 51, 1950

Training and Empioyment of Special Workers

(Article SZArticle ST- 72: Apprentices
, Nitto Enterprises vs. NLRC and R. Capili {G.R. No. tL43S7, Sept 29, 1995}

Filamer Christian Institute vs. Hon. Intermediate Appellate Court {G.R. No. 75rrz, Aug.
t7, tggz)

Article 73- 77t Learners

Article 78-8r: Handicapped Workers

Conditions of Emplo).ment
(Article 8z-qS)
Employee- Employer Relationship
"Brotherhood" Labor Unity Movement of the Philippines vs. Zamora {G.R. No. 48645, Jan
z roRz]
Tabas et., al vs. California Manufacturing Co. et.al {G.R. No. 8o68o, Jan. 26, r98g)
Ser,'illa vs. CA {G.R. No. 44182-3,

April r5, t988}

Continental Marble Corporation vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 42825, May 9, tgBB}
Encyclopedia Britannica inc. vs. NLRC iG.R. No. 87o98, I.Iov. 4, r996i
Dy Keh Beng vs. International Labor and Marine Union et. A1. L-32245, May 25, tg79
Zanotte Shoes vs. NLRC {G.R No. roo665, Feb 13, t995}
Air Material Wing Savings and Loan Association Inc., vs. NLRC {G.R. No. rrr87o, June 3o,
r994]i
Hydro Resources Contractors Corp. vs. Pagalilauan r7e SCRA399
Insular Assurance Co. vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 119930, March rz, t998}
Angelina Francisco vs. NLRC, Kasei Corp. etc. {G.R. No. :.7oo87, August 3t, zoo6}
Opulencia Ice Plant vs. NLRC {G.R No. 98368, December $, 1993}
Domasig vs. NLRC {G.R. No. rtSro:., Sept. 16, 1996}
Equitable Banking Corporation vs. NLRC and R.L Sadac {G.R. No. roz467, June r3, 1997}
Zamrrdio vs. NI RC {G.R. No. 76729, March zS, tggo}
Paguio vs. NLRC et. al. {G.R. No. 147816, May 9, zoo3}
Great Pacific Life Assurance Corp. vs. Judico {G.R. No. 78887, Dec. zr, 1989}
Feati University vs. Hon. Jose S. Bautista and Feati University Faculty Club {G.R. no. L-

ztz78,Dec.27, tg66'1
Citizens League of Free Workers et, al vs. Abbas {G.R. No. L-zrzrz, Sept. 23, 1966}
Villamaria vs. CA and Bustamante {G.R. No. 16588r, April rg, zoo6}
Sy et. aI. vs. Hon. Court ofAppeals and J. Sahot {G.R. No. r4zz93, Feb. 27, zoo3}
Makati Haberriashery, Inc. vs., NLRC {G.R. Nos. 8338o-81, Nov. 15, r989i
Cauddanetaan Piece Workers Union vs. Undersecretary Bienvenido Laguesma {G.R. No.
rrSS42, Feb z+. rgg8)
Ruga et. al. vs. NLRC {G.R. Nos. 72654-6r,Jan. zz, r99o}
A. Maraguinot and P. Enero vs. NLRC and Viva Films {G.R. no. tzog69, Jan. zz, 1998}
Orlando Farm Gro'w,ers r-s. NLRC {G.R. No. tzgo76, Nor.. 25. ro98}

Article 8z: Excluded Employees

Managerial Employees
National Sugar Refineries Corp. vs. NLRC {G.R. No. ror76t, March 24, rgg1}
Penaranda vs. Banganga Ply,wood Corp. et. al. {G.R. no. tSgSTT,May S, zoo6}

Field Personnel
Auto Bus Transport System Inc. vs. Bautista {G.R. No. tS6t6l, May 16, zoo5}
Union of Filipino Employees vs. Vivar {G.R. No. 7g2SS, Jan. eo, r99z}
San Miguel Brewery Inc. vs. Domestic Labor Organization iG.R. No. L-r8353, July 3r,

i963)

Domestic Helper and Persons Rendering Personai Service

Abundio Cadiz et.al. vs. Philippine Sinter Corporation {NLRC Case 7-1729, July 3, 1979}
Rosales vs. Tan Que {G.R. No. r973-R, Nov. rz, 1948}

Workers paid by result

Adriano Quintos vs. D.D. Transport Co., Inc. {NLRC Case No. RB-IB-zo94r-78, May 31,
r979]}

Lara vs. Del Rosario {G.R. No. L-6BSg,April eo, 1954}

Article 83: Hours of Work

Manila Terminal Co. Inc. vs. CIR et. al {G.R. No. L-4t48, July 16, r95z}
Interphil Laboratories Employees Union- FFW, et. al vs. Interphil Laboratories {G.R. No.
t4z9z4, December 19, zoori

Article 84: Hours Worked

Pan American World Airways System vs. Pan American Employees Association {G.R. No.
L- 16z7 5, February 23, tg 6r|
Jose Gayona vs. Good Earth Emporium and Supermarket {NLRC Case No. \r-13704-27,
Apr. 5, 1979)
Universif of Pangasinan Faculty Union vs. University of Pangasinan {L- 63tzz, February

zz, tg84j - Regular Full time teachers are entitled to salary during semestral breaks

Luzon Stevedoring Co. Inc. vs. Luzon Marine Department Union (G.R. No. L-9265, April
29, 1957)
Cagampan et. al vs. NLRC { G.R. Nos. 85tzz-24, March 24,tggt'}
National Development Company vs. CIR {G.R. No. L-r54zz, November go, 196z} - When
MeaI time is considered to be hours worked

Sime Darby Pilipinas, Inc. vs. NLRC {G.R No. u9zo5, April $, 1988}
Mercury Drug Co Inc. vs. Nartlo Dayao et., al iG.R. No. L-3o452, September 3o,tg9z]7

NightDffirential

National Shipyards and Steel Corporation vs. CIR 3 SCRA 89o (196r) - Ouertime Work
Bisig ng Manggagawa ng Philippine Refining Co., Inc. {G.R No. L-2776r, Sept. go, 1981}
PNBvs. PNB Employees Assn. rr5 SCRA5oT (rg8z)

Quitclaim

Pampanga Siigar Development Co. vs. CiR{G.R. No. L-$9S87,

june:9, i98z}

Article 87-88: Offset Overtime

NWSAvs. NWSA Consolidated Unions rr SCRA 766
Rodrigo Sto. Domingo vs. Phil Rock Products, ITILRC Case No. RB g34t-77 June 3o, r98o

Article gL-gS: Rest Days

Cf: De Leon vs. Pampanga Sugar Development Co., Inc. zo SCRA 628

Article 94: Holiday and Holiday Pays

pi-ol
Inca

n^llad6

r,c

I\TT

(rrQo
D/i ,n,-l \TAT^IAI -rl: D I{^
vwL rL, rnaa\
L)v / I
lu.^\. r\v. uc+u4, r-\oa

San Miguel Corp. vs. CA et. al. {G.R. No. t467ZS, January Bo, 2oo2}
Insular Bank of Asia and American Employees Union vs. Hon. Amado G. Inciong

{G.R. No. L-524r5, October 23, 1984}

The Chartered Bank Empioyees Association vs. Hon. Blas Opie iG.R. No. L447t7, Au:gust 28, 1985)
Obango vs. NLRC andAntique Electric Cooperative Inc. {G.R. No. r474zo, June
10,2OO4)
Union of Filipro Employees vs. Benigno Vivar., Jr., NLRC and Nestle Phils. Inc.
{G.R. No 7gzSS, Janzo,tggz}
Wellington Investment and Manufacturing Corporation vs. Cresenciano BTrajano {G.R. No. ru698, July 3, 1995}
Jose Rizal College vs. NIRC {G.R. No. 65482, Dec. t, r.98/

Sick Leave
Baltazar vs. San Miguei Brewery, inc.L-23o76, February 27, t969
Davao Integrated Port Stevedoring Serwiees vs. Abarquez {G.R.No. rozr3z,

March tg,Tgg1)
Kwokvs. Philippine Carpet Manufacturing Corp. {G.R. No. ro2t12, March r9,
1993i

Wages and Salary

/

rtinla nry\

Wages and Salary

Songco et.al vs. NLRC {G.R. Nos. 5o999-5rooo, March 23, r99o}
Ruga et. al vs. NLRC {G.R. Nos. 72654-6r,Jan zz, r99o}

Facilities Distinguished from Supplement

State Marine Corporation and Royai Line vs. Cebu Seamen's Association, Inc. iG.R.. i.Io. Ltz 444, F ebrluary 28, 19 63)

Fair Day's Wage for Fair Day's Labor

Philippine Airlines vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 55159, June zz, rgSgl

Equal Payfor Equal Work

International School Alliance of Educatoi:s vs. Hon. Leandro Quisumbing et. al. {G.R. No.
re8845, June r, zooo)

MinimumWaee
(Article 99-1o1)
Minimum Wage
Atok Big Wedge Mining Co. Inc. vs. Atok Big Wedge Mutual Benefit Association {G.R. No.
L-5276, March g, 1953i
De Racho vs. Municipality of Iligan {G.R. No. L-zg44z, January z, 1968}
C. Planas Commercial vs. NLRC, A Ofialda et. al., {G.R. No. 144619, November rr, zoo5}

Article roo: Eilmination or Diminution of Benefits

Davao Integrated Ports Stevedoring Services vs. Abarquez {G.R. No. ro2t12, March 19,

1993\

Food or MealAllowance
Cebu Autobus Company vs. United Cebu Autobus Employees Assn.

Non-Contributory Retirement Plan

Nestle Philippines vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 9rz3r, Feb 4,

l99r}

Monthly Emergency Allowance

R. Tiangco and Y. Tiangco vs. Hon. Yicente Leogardo, Jr. {G.R. No. L-57636, May 16,
19831

Exceptions
Globe Mackay Cable vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 7496, .Iune e9, 1988}
Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Topform Manufacturing vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 113856, Sept. 7,
1998)
Pag-Asa Steel Works vs. CA, et. aL {G.R. No. 166647, March 3r, zoo6}
Lexal Laboratories is. Court oflndustrial Relations et. al. tL-z463z,Oct. e6, i968)
National Sugar Refineries Corp. vs. NLRC {G.R. No. tor76t, March 24, Lggg)
American Wire and Cable Daily Rated Employees Union vs. American Wire and Cable Co.,
and the Court of Appeals {G.R No. r55o59, April 29, zoo5}
L.G. Marcos et. ai. vs. NLRC and lnsular Life Assurance Co., Ltd. iG.R. No. LrL744,
September 8, 19951
Traders Royal Bankvs. NLRC tG.R. No. 88168, August go, r99o)

Thirteenth Month Pay

National Federation of Sugar Workers vs. Ovejera rr4 SCRA gS+ UgSz)
Universal Corrr Products vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 6o387, August zr, rg87}
Philippine Airlines vs. NLRC and Airline Pilots Assn. of the Philippines {G.R. No. u4z8c,
July e6, 1996)
Framanlis Farrns Inc. vs. Minister of Labor {G.R Nos. 726t6-r7, March 8, 1989}
San Miguel Corporation vs. Inciong ro3 SCRA l39 (r98r)
Phiiippine Dupiicators Inc. vs. NLRC {G.RNo. rroo6Si
Isaiama Machine Works vs. NLRC et.al. {G.R. No. roo167, March 2, ryg1}
Alliance of Government Workers et- al vs. Minister of Labor and Employrnent {G.R. No. L6o4o3, August 3, 1983)

Article rot: Payrnent

b1' Resuits

Tan vs. I-agrama {G.R No. r5rez8, August r5, zooz}

Lambo vs. NLRC {G.R- No. 111042, October 26, 1999}

Piece Rate Workers

Makati Haberdasheryvs. NLRC {G.R. Nos.8338o-8r, Nov. 15, t989}
Labor Congress of the Philippines vs. NLRC and Empire Food Products {G.R. No. 123938,
May zt, 1998)

Payment of Wages
( Article roz)
Proof of Wage Pa)rynent
Jimenez et. al. vs. NLRC and Juanatas, {G.R. No. 11696o, April z, t9g6}

Article ro6: Labor-Only Contracting

Neri vs. NLRC, Far East Bank and Tmst Co- {G-R Nos- 978oo8-og, July 2A, 1993}
Manila Water Co. vs. Pena {G.R. No. 158255, July 8, zoo+.}
San Miguel Corp. vs. Aballa {G.R No. L4gott,June 28, zoo5}
Philippines Bank of Communications vs. NLRC {G.R. No. L-66598, December 19, 1986}
Tabas et. al. vs. California Manufacturing Company {G.R. No. 8o68o, June 26, 1989}

Independent Contractor
Mafinco Trading Corporation vs. Ople, NLRC et. al. {G.R. No. L-3779o, March 25,19761
Insular Life Insurance Co., Ltd. Ys. NLRC {G.R. No. B+q8q, Nov. 15, 1989}
Rhone-Poulenc Agrochemicals Philippines, Inc. vs. NLRC {G.R. Nos. roz633-35, January
19, rggS)
Escario et. al. vs. NLRC {G.R. No. rz4o55, June B, eooo}

Prohibition Regarding Wages

(Article rr9)
Wage Deduction
Radio Communications of the Philippines Inc. vs. Secretary of Labor {G.R. No. 77959, Jan.

'9, 1989)

Apodaca vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 8oo39, April t8, r989i

Wage Distortion

Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company Employees vs. NLRC {G.R. No- roz536, Sept. ro,

Lg%|
National Federation of Labor vs. NLRC et. al. zg4 SCRA 3u (tSS+)
Manila Mandarin Employees Union vs. NLRC {G.R. No. ro8556, November r9, 1996}

Waee S,tudies, Waee Agreements and Wage Determination

(Article Lzo- t2T)
Wage Fixing
Cagayan Sugar Milling Co., vs. Secretary of Labor, et.al. {G.R. No. tz93gg, January t5,
r nnal
L9YU
J

ECOP vs. NWPC {G.R No. 96t69, September 24,

r99t}

Administration and Enforcement

(Article rz8)
Subj ects of Enforcement

Statutory Benefits are apart from Contractual Benefits

Meycauayan College vs. Drilon {G.R. No. Brrzz, May 7, Lgga)

Teacher's Share in Tuition Fee Increase

St. Joseph's College vs- St- Joseph's CoIIege Workers'Association {G.R. No. 1556o9,

January 17, zoo5)

Cases on Enforcement
COCOFED et. al. vs. Hon. Cresenciano B. Trajano et.al. {G.R. No. 98227, Feb. r5, rg95}
L
I
, !-,rn:l
a^n
ri
-^6^f
^
^
^^\.cuu
Auetylelle
r9o9l
wxytell
arlu
\.U., IllU. vS. Ul ltuu 1\r.n. l\U. O2O+9, frUB. z,
Odin SecurityAgencyvs. Hon Dionisio Dela Serna et.al. {G.R. No. 87439, Feb. er, r99o}
Urbanes etc. vs. Hon. Security of Iabor {G.R. No. L2z7gt, February 19, eoo3}

Ernployrnent ofWornen
(Article $0-188)
Emplo5.rnent
Zialcita vs. PAL RO4-3-3298-76,Feb za, tg77
Olympia Gualberto vs. Marinduque Mining Industrial Corporation {G.R. No. 52753- R,
June e8, rg78)

Article 1go- Nightwork Prohibition

Article 1gg: Maternity Leave Benefits
Article r37: Prohibited Acts

Emploliment of Minors
(Article rgg-r+o)

Employment of Househelpers
(Article t1t-L1z)
Article r43: Minimum Wage
Apex Mining Co., Inc. vs. NLRC {G.R. No. 9495r, April zz,

tggr}

Healthy. Safety and SocialWelfare Benefits

(Article 156-161)
Medical, Dental and Occupational Safety
Philippine Global Communications, Inc. {G.R No. r57zr4, June 7, zpos}

Employ_ees' Cornpensation and State Insurance Fund

(Articie r66-r8+)

Cases

Jose B. Sarmiento vs. Employees Compensation Cornmission, et.al. {G.R. No. 6568o. May

tr, 1988)

Raro vs. Employees Compensation commission {G.R. No. 58445, April 27, rgSg)
Belarmino vi. dmployees'Compensation Commission {G.R. No. 9oro4, May 11, r99o]
Hinoguin vs. Employees Compensation Commission {G.R. No. 843o, April 17, 1989}
GSIS vs. CA and F. Alegre {G.R. No. rz85z4, April zo, 1999}
Valeriano vs. Employees Compensation Commission and GSIS {G.R. No. 136200, June
a onnn\
vrlvvv

Iloilo Dock and Engineering Corporation vs. WCC, et.al. L-z6g4L November 27,t978
Alano vs. ECG {G.R. No. L-48594, March 16, 1988}
tazo vs. Employees compensation commission {G.R. No. 78617, June 18, r99o}
Menezvs. nmpioyees Compensailon Commission {G.R.. No. L-+8+88, Aprii 25, 198oi "r'

Employees'Compensation Commission

Mabuhay Shippinq Services and Skippers Maritime Co. vs. NLRC {G.R No. 94L67, Jan 21,
1991)

Interorient Maritime Enterprises vs. C. Pineda {G.R. No. 1li5497, September ]:6, tgg6}
NAESS Shipping Philippiues vs. NLRC {G.R No. 7344r, September 4, l9B-7}
Ysmael tvtaritime Corporation vs. Avelino {G.R. No. 43674,J'me 3'o, 1987}

Medical Benefits
(Article r85- r9o)

Disability Benefits
(Article 191-193)
Disability Defined

Vicente vs. ECC {G.R No. 85o24, Jan' 23, r99r}

Abaya vs. Employees Compensation Corrrurission { G.R No' 64255, Aug' 1989i

Article tg2-Lgg:Permanent Disability Benefits

Orlino vs. Employees'Compensation Commission et. aI, {G.R. No. 85or5, March 29,

1990)
Vicente vs. ECC {G.R No. 85o24, Jan. 23, r99r}
GSIS vs. Court of Appeals and R Balais {G-R No' u7572, January 29, r99B}

Death Benefits
(Article r94)
Cases

Canonizado vs. Almeda-Lopez { G.R. No. L-r3oo5, Sept. 30, 1960}

Manzpnovs. ECC {G.R No. 88573, June 25, r99o}

Provisions Corrrmon to Income Benefrts

(Article Lg5-2o4)

Cases

Employees Compensation Commissionvs. E, Sanico, {G.R. No. 13428, December \7,Lggg}

Suanei vs. Workmen's Compensation Commission {G.R. No. 4e8oB, January 3r, 1989}

Records, Reports and Final Provisions

(Article 2o5- 2o8-A)

Medicare
(Article zog)

Adult Education
(Artic1e

zro)