Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CHAPTERONE
TERMS
PROPERTIESOFA TERM
COMPREHENSION – is thesumof the total notes implyingthe elementsmakinga thing
to be what it is.
COMPREHENSION EXTENSION
SPORT SOFTBALL
DESSERT MANGOFLOAT
SOAP SAFEGUARD
CLASSIFICATIONSOFTERMS
SINGULAR – stands for only one certain subject
Ex. all, every, each, any, anything, whatsoever, whatever, no, none, nothing
1
UNIVOCAL – things which have same sense.
Ex. The book is a reading material.
ANALOGOUS – things which are the same and somewhat different in sense
MATERIAL – a reference made to a term simply as a word which is not related to its
meaning
CONNECTED – terms are related wherein one either connote or denote the other.
NON – CONVERTIBLE – terms which are related wherein one includes the other in
its comprehension but the other is excluded in its comprehension.
STRICTLY OPPOSED
CONTRADICTORIES – two terms wherein one is the simple negation of the other
PRIVATIVE – two terms wherein one expresses the perfection while the other
expresses the absence of the perfection that should be possessed
DISPOSITIONS – easily changed perfections disposing the subject well or badly in its
operation
ACTION – accident resulting from the action of the subject towards something else
POSTURE – accident arising by the subject from the order of parts in a given space
Chapter 2: PROPOSITIONS
Proposition - is that which a judgment is expressed.
− it is always expressed in a declarative sentence and it is answerable by a yes or no
Judgment- a mental operation wherein two ideas are affirmed or negated
− Example: human beings are given the power of choice where one can decide for his/her own
granting he/she will be always ready to face all the consequences for every decision that has been
made.
Copula
− Links subject and predicate.
− Example: Velez College is the best school for students taking up medical courses.
4.) Multiple Proposition- has more than one subject and predicate
Ex: Kuya Kim will teach and the students will listen. 4
Categorical Propositions
Basic Aspects
QUANTITY OF PROPOSITION
1.) Single Categorical – has one subject and one predicate or complex.
Ex: (simple) Pearls are precious.
(complex) Fear of the Lord is the beginning of faith.
a) Copulative proposition- uses coordinate and correlative conjunction like and, not only, both
Ex: Clint and Xian are meant together.
d) Causal proposition- introduces reason or cause in a given statement like because, for, since
Ex: She left because she doesn’t belong to their group.
6
b.)Exceptive proposition- uses expression like except save
Example: All students, except three, have passed the project.
Exponents: Three students have not passed the project.
The other students have passed the project.
1.) Proper disjunctive- terms that can’t be true and false at the same time
Ex: John is either straight or gay.
2.) Improper disjunctive- terms that cannot be all false but can be true at the same time
Ex. His sadness was due either to his accusations or to his failed project.
Inference in general
There are a lot of propositions which are ought to be true on the basis of the evidence of the sense. Statements
which are verified or falsified by direct seeing, hearing, feeling or by direct perceiving like “It is valentines
day,” “She is not feeling well” are some examples.
Some accept only by the basis of authority. Example, if we believe in the preaching of the priest, we accept his
teachings as true. It is the process where by from the truth-value of one or more propositions called inference.
Possible truths are obtained by inference.
Types of Inferences
− Immediate Inferences
− Mediate Inferences
In the first kind of inference, this proceed from one proposition directly to another proposition. On the other
hand, the mediate inferences proceed from two or more propositions to another which is implied in the given
propositions.
Examples:
− No soft is a pillow. So, no pillow is a soft.
Following: No X is Y.
So, no Y is X.
Following: M is P
S is M
So, S is P.
>> It involves a relation between one statement and its opposites. In terms of opposition of proposition,
we have the relation between two proposition having the same subject and predicate, but they’re differ in
quality, quantity or both quality and quantity.
Examples: No S is P -- Some S is P
Not all S is P -- Every S is P
2. Contrariety – universal proposition that differ in quality
Examples: No S is P -- Every S is P
3. Subcontrariety – two particular proposition that differ in quality
1. law of contradiction
A. if one is true, the other is false
Examples:
No cheater is honest is true
Some cheater are honest is false
B. if one is false, the other is true
Examples:
It is false that some rabbits are able to think
It is true that no rabbits is able to think
2. law of subalternation
A. if the universal statement is true, the subaltern is also true
Examples:
It is true that no benign tumors is incurable
It is false that some benign tumors are not incurable
B. if the particular statement is true, the subaltern is doubtful
Examples:
It is true that some artists are creative
Every artist is creative is doubtful
9
C. if the particular statement is false, the subaltern is likewise false.
Examples:
That some radicals are reactionary is false.
It is likewise false that every radical is reactionary.
D. If the universal is false, the subaltern is doubtful
Examples:
It is false that no TV show is good for the children
It is doubtful whether some TV shows are not good for the children
3. law of contrariety
A. Cannot be true at the same time.
Examples:
If it is true that no hero is a coward
It is false that every hero is a coward
4. law of subcontrariety
A. subcontraries cannot be false at the same time
Examples:
It is false that some obstacles are insurmountable
It is true that not all obstacles are insurmountable
B. subcontraries cannot be true at the same time
Examples:
It is true that some movies are purely for entertainment
It is false that some movies are not purely for entertainment
SUMMARY:
10
Chapter 5: EDUCTION
TYPES OF EDUCTION
A. Obversion – whose subject is the same as the original subject but whose predicate is the contradictory of
the given predicate.
Examples:
No fish is unable to swim (obvert)
Every fish is able to swim (obverse)
Obversion of A, E, I and O
1. E obverts to A
No S is P
Every S is P
2. A obverts to E
Every S is P
No S is P
3. I obverts to O
Some S is P
Some S is not P
4. O obverts to I
Some S is not P
Some S is P
B. Conversion – whose subject is the original predicate and whose predicate is the original subject.
Examples:
No sinner is a saint (obvert)
No saint is a sinner (obverse)
C. Contraposition – “partial” whose subject is the contradictory of the original predicate but whose
predicate is the same as the original subject; “full” whose subject is the contradictory of the given
predicate and whose predicate is the contradictory of the given subject.
Contraposition of A, E and O
A.
Given: every S is P
Obverse: No S is P
Converse: No P is S
Obverse: Every P is S
E.
Given: No S is P
Obverse: Every S is P
Converse: Some P is S
Obverse: Some P is not S
11
O.
Given: Some S is not P
Obverse: Some S is P
Converse: Some P is S
Obverse: Some P is not S
D. Inversion – “partial” whose subject is the contradictory of the given subject but whose predicate is the
same as the given predicate; “full” whose subject and predicate are the contradictories of the given
subject and predicate.
Inversion of A
Given: Every S is P
Obverse: No S is P
Converse: No P is S
Obverse: Every P is S
Converse: Some S is P (partial inverse)
Obverse: Some S is not P (full inverse)
Inversion of A
Given: No S is P
Converse: No S is P
Obverse: Every P is S
Converse: Some Sis P (partial inverse)
Obverse: Some S is not P (full inverse)
12
Mammals eat
Arroyo is a politician.
TYPES of ARGUMENT
Therefore, all the ten nuns in the Augustinian Parish are modest.
Arman is a man.
13
Chapter 7: THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
The categorical syllogism is an argument proceeds from statements concerning the relationship of two terms
to a third term, to conclusion concerning the relationship of two terms to each other.
1. Principle of Reciprocal Identity: two terms that are identical with a third term are identical with each other.
2. Principle of Reciprocal Non-Identity: two terms, one of which is identical with a third, but the other of
which is not, are not identical with each other.
3. Principle of All (Dictum de Omme ) : What is affirmed universally of a term is affirmed of anything that
comes under that term.
4. Principle of None (Dictum de Nullo): Whatever is denied universally of any term is denied of anything that
comes under that term.
14
The Rules for a Valid Categorical Syllogism
Rule No.1 There must be three and only three terms – the major, minor & middle terms.
• There is a violation of this rule when there are four terms in the syllogism giving rise to what is
known as the “fallacy of four term construction” or “logical quadruped”.
• The following are examples of arguments with four terms:
A diligent man works hard.
A lazy man hardly works.
Therefore, a lazy man is diligent.
Rule No. 2 The middle term does not occur in the conclusion.
• This so because the function of the middle term is to compare the minor and major terms and this
comparison happens only in the premises.
The following arguments violate the 2nd rule and are therefore invalid.
Men have a spiritual nature.
Men have biological needs.
Therefore, men are spiritual beings with biological needs.
Rule No. 3 The major or minor term may not be universal in the conclusion if it is only particular in the
premises.
• This rule implies that if the major or minor term is particular in the premises, it must be taken as
a particular term in the conclusion, not as a universal term.
• If the major term is overextended in the conclusion, then there is a “fallacy of illicit major”. If
the minor term is overextended in the conclusion, then there is a “fallacy of illicit minor”.
• The following arguments are invalid due to an illicit process:
Rule No. 4 The middle term must be used as a universal term at least once.
• This rule implies the role of the middle term in the reasoning process, which is to mediate
between the major and minor terms.
• If the middle term is used twice as a particular term, then there is a “fallacy of undistributed
middle term”.
• A violation of the above rule is illustrated in the following syllogism:
A Lutheran is a Christian.
A Seventh - day Adventist is a Christian.
Ergo, a Seventh - day Adventist is a Lutheran.
15
Rule No. 5 Two negative premises yield no valid conclusion.
• If both premises are negative, then the middle term is not identified with or does not agree with
the major and minor terms. In that case, the middle term does not really function as a mediating
term. As a result, no conclusion can be made. Thus, we cannot validly say—
A scholar does not have failing grades.
Mercy does not have failing grades.
Ergo, she’s a scholar.
• Some syllogisms have propositions which are only apparently negative and yield valid
conclusions. This is the case with the following syllogism:
No one who is uninspired is in love.
You are not inspired.
Therefore, you are not in love.
• The above syllogism does not violate the rule because the second premise is not really negative.
Rule No. 6 If both premises are affirmative, the conclusion must be affirmative.
• This rule follows from the fact that when both premises are affirmative, the major and minor
terms agree or are identified with the middle term.
• It is closely related to the reciprocal identity. This is expressed by the affirmative copula.
Therefore, the conclusion which expresses this identity must be an affirmative proposition.
• It would be wrong to argue that:
Anyone with an IQ of 141 is genius.
Alex has an IQ of 141.
Ergo, he is not a moron.
• Aside from violating rule no. 6, the first syllogism also violates rule no. 1 and the 2nd also
violates rule no. 4.
16
• nd
The 2 pair of premises is that of E and I. E has a universal subject and predicate. I has a
particular subject and predicate. In this combination, there are 2 universal terms and 2 particular
terms. This is shown below:
E Mu – Pu E Pu – Mu
Or
I Sp + Mp I Mp + Sp
Sp – Pu Sp – Pu
• The 3rd set of premise is that of A and O. Here, there are again 2 universal terms and 2 particular
terms.
• The 4th combination is that of E and O. Because both premises are negative, no valid conclusion
can be drawn from them.
• Whenever rule no. 8 is violated, there is a violation either of rule no. 3, 4, or 5. This is seen in the
following examples:
Some rich men oppress the poor.
Mr. Katibayan is a rich man.
Ergo, Mr. Katibayan oppresses the poor.
Rule No. 9 From two particular premises, no valid conclusion can be drawn.
• To prove this rule, one need only show that of the possible combinations of premises both of
which are particular, not one will yield a valid conclusion.
• When this rule is violated, there is also a violation of rule no. 3, 4, or 5. Consider the following
examples:
Some fruits are rich in Vitamin A.
Some fruits are lemons.
Ergo, some lemons are rich in Vitamin A.
Every syllogism has 3 propositions and each proposition is either A, E I or O. By the mood of the categorical
syllogism, we understand the specific combination of the propositions that make up the syllogism.
The following are the 64 possible moods of syllogism. However, not all of them are valid syllogisms.
Most of the above combinations are immediately seen as invalid once we apply the general rules.
A careful inspection will yield the following tentatively valid moods:
I II III IV
A Mu + Pp Pu + Mp Mu + Pp Pu + Mp
A Su + Mp Su + Mp Mu + Sp Mu + Sp
A Su + Pp Su + Pp Su + Pp Su + Pp
4 moods in enclosed in double parenthesis [(( ))] = syllogisms with strengthened premises
- code names are used in traditional logic of each syllogism figures that one value
Reduction - transformation of a syllogism
- first figure is considered as the perfect figure
figures:
I II III IV
bArbArA cEsArE dArApTI frEsIsOn
cEIArEnt cAmEstrEs dAtIsI brAmAntIp
dArII fEstInO dIsAmIs cAmEnEs
fErIo bArOcO fErIsOn fEsApO
fEIAptOn dImArIs
bOcArdO
- first letter of the code names signify the mood of the first figure into which it may be reduced
Example: cEsArE is reducible to mood cEIArEnt
Direct Reduction
Example:
dIsAmIs to dArII
- cannot be reduced directly bOcArdO and bArOcO so we use the first figure, bArbAra, making it valid and
also it implies an indirect reduction.
Example:
19
Testing the Validity by the Venn diagram Method
Conclusion: “Some penguins are swift” meaning there is at least one penguin that can be swift
shown by the X in the area common to the circles representing “birds” and “swift”
20
Example:
Antilogism:
All C are S. CS = O
All M are C. MC = O
The hypothetical argument is an argument whose 1st premise is a sequential or hypothetical proposition, one
member of which is affirmed or denied in the second premise, and the other member of which is consequently
affirmed or denied in the conclusion.
1.) Simple conditional argument – has a conditional proposition for major premise and categorical propositions
for minor premise and conclusion.
Examples:
a) If man were God, then he would be all-knowing.
But man is not all- knowing.
Ergo, he is not God.
The rules for a valid simple conditional syllogism are based on the very nature of the conditional proposition
which asserts that there is a necessary sequence between its elements – the antecedent A and the consequent C.
22
The following arguments illustrate the valid forms:
A simple conditional argument may have a valid form but its major premise may be a false conditional
statement. Such a syllogism is formally correct but materially incorrect.
2.) The reciprocal conditional syllogism has for its major premise an “only if…then…” proposition.
Example: Only if a student has a general average of at least 1.2 would he
graduate summa cum laude.
This student has a general average of 1.2.
Therefore, he would graduate summa cum laude.
3.) The biconditional syllogism has for its major premise a statement containing the expression “if and only if”.
Example: If and only if one gets a perfect score in all quizzes will I
exempt him from the final exam.
Mario got a perfect score in all quizzes.
Ergo, he’ll be exempted from the final exam.
4.) The pure conditional statement has a conditional proposition for premises and conclusion.
Example: If A is B, then C is D.
If X is Y, then A is B.
Ergo, If X is Y, then C is D.
To be a valid argument, the common element in the argument must be taken once as antecedent and once as
consequent
The following examples illustrate invalid forms of this syllogism:
Example : If you don’t pay your accounts, you won’t be given an admission slip.
If you don’t have your admission slip, then you can’t take the exam.
If you don’t take the exam, then you’ll get IE.
Ergo, if you don’t pay your accounts, you’ll get an IE.
a) Positing Mood – minor premise posits or accepts one member of the Disjunction and the
conclusion sublates or rejects the other.
b)
Example: This argument is either valid or invalid.
This argument is valid.
Ergo, it is not valid.
c) Sublating Mood – minor sublates or rejects one of the members of the disjunction and the
conclusion affirms or posits the other.
Example: You are either a Catholic or not.
You are not a Catholic.
Ergo, you are a non- Catholic.
The major premise expresses alternatives that cannot be true at the same time; its major premise affirms or
denies one of the alternatives and the conclusion consequently affirms or denies the other.
The rule of this syllogism is simply to affirm one alternative in the minor and to deny the other in the
conclusion.
Example: You cannot study properly and watch a TV show at the same time.
You are watching a TV show. +
Ergo, you are not studying properly. – Valid
You cannot study properly and watch a TV show at the same time.
You are not watching a TV show. –
Ergo, you are studying properly. + Invalid
25
Chapter 9: VARIATIONS OF THE SYLLOGISM
The Enthymeme
3 forms:
- not necessarily an abbreviated categorical syllogism. It may also be an abridged hypothetical syllogism.
Example: Since the paper was torn, the students threw the paper away.
- at least one of the propostions is an exclusive statement; it contains the expressions “only,” “solely,” “alone,”
or “none but.”
1. Consists in drawing the components of the given syllogism and testing the validity of each.
If both are valid, the whole argument is valid; otherwise, it is invalid.
Example:
I
The excellent in the field of fables is the father of fables. Mu + Pp
Aesop is excellent in the field of fables. Su + Mp
Ergo, Aesop is the father of fables. Su + Pp
II
The excellent in the field of fables is the father of fables. Mu + Pp
Who is not Aesop is not excellent in the field of fables. Su - Mu
Ergo, who is not Aesop is not the father of fables. Su - Pu
26
Given: The excellent in the field of fables is the father of fables.
Only Aesop is excellent in the field of fables.
So, only Aesop is the father of fables.
The Epichireme
Examples:
The Polysyllogism
The Sorites
- an abbreviated polysyllogism.
2 forms:
1. Aristotelian sorites - subject of the preceding premise is used as predicate of the following premise
- conclusion which is composed of the subject of the last premise and the predicate of the
first premise
2. Goclenian sorites - subject of the preceding premise is used as the predicate of the following premise
- conclusion which is composed of the subject of the last premise and the predicate of the
first premise
Aristotelian SA Goclenian AP
Sorites AB Sorites: BA
BC CB
CP SC
SP SP
27
The Dilemma
4 forms:
Premises: If A, then C
If B, then C
either A
But
or B
Conclusion: Ergo, C
Premises: If A, then C
If B, then D
either A
But
or B
Conclusion: Ergo, C or D.
Premises: If A, then C
If B, then D
either not C
But
or not D
Conclusion: Ergo, either not A or not B
28
Summary
Chapter 3 Inference 8
Chapter 5 Eduction 11 – 12
Allocation of Topics