Ante Vrankovi

Domjanieva 15
10380 Sveti Ivan Zelina
Croatia/Hrvatska
September 18, 2015

Mrs Vra Jourov

European Commissioner for Justice

Rue de la Loi 200 / Wetstraat 200

1049 Bruxelles
Belgium/Belgija
On the knowledge/Na znanje:
Mr Gunther Krichbaum
Organizacije za ljudska prava/Organisations for human rights

Subject: Request for an apology because of inaccurate claims of Mr Crabit in his official letter of Sep. 1, 2015, and for
the correction of the negative impacts of these claims (The European Code of Good Administrative Behavior, Art 12)
Predmet: Zahtjev za isprikom zbog netonih tvrdnji g. Crabita u njegovom dopisu od 1. rujna 2015., i za ispravkom
negativnih utjecaja koji su iz tih tvrdnji proizali (Europski kodeks o dobrom ponaanju zaposlenih u upravi, l. 12)
Dear Mrs. Jourov,
several days ago I received from your office a response to my official letters of February 6, and April 17, 2015, which
truly surprised me, because in that response (see Attachment 1-2) Mr Crabit stated many inaccuracies about my case (see
below: I.-IV.).
I.
It is not accurate that in my letters "I voiced (my) concern with regard to the alleged corruption in the Croatian Bar
Association and the situation in the Croatian justice system" (Attachment 1/A).
The reason of my communication with the European Commission (EC) i.e. of my official letters to Mrs. Reding,
Reicherts and you was not "(my) concern with regard to the alleged corruption in the Croatian Bar Association and the
situation in the Croatian justice system", but trampling of my fundamental right to life, which trampling was officially
confirmed by the Croatian Helsinki Committee (CHC) i.e. Hrvatski helsinki odbor (HHO). That reason was stated in a very
clear manner in two places on the very first page of my first letter to Mrs Reding, sent on July 3, 2013, which - like all other
communication between me and Commission - can be seen on the link at the bottom of this official letter. On that letter of
July 3, 2013 Mr. Emmanuel Crabit sent a reply on September 23, 2013. Since he was the one who answered me also in your
name, he certainly knew about my official letter of July 3, 2013 and the meaning of my communication to the European
Commission. Thus he had to know that my letters did not had for their subject some general situation, but my particular case.

1)

2)

3)

4)
5)
6)

It is important to stress-out that corruption in Croatian Bar Association (CBA) is not "alleged" as Mr Crabit claimed, but
real and proven. Documents proving that corruption, which I have already sent you (EC) are:
Official letter of the chief of First Police Station of the City of Zagreb, Mr Zvonimir Petrovic, sent on June 18, 2012, in
which he officially stated that the police investigation has not confirmed any of Andreis`s (then President of CBA)
careges against me, which is irrefutable official proof that Andreis falsely reported me to the police. I have informed EC
(Mrs. Reding) about that already in my first official letter, sent on July 3, 2013, p. 4 (4).
Letter from the Director of Tax Administration in the Ministry on Finance, Mrs Nada avlovi Smiljanec, sent on
February 5, 2013, in which she confirms that all (i. e. lawyers and others) are obliged to pay taxes, which obligation in
communication with me CBA officially denied three times (sic!), so due to that official behaviour, Croatian lawyers in
2013. became only lawyers in the world obligated to have fiscal cash registers (letter of July 3, 2013, p. 4 (5), and p. 7/A).
An official statement of the Croatian Helsinki Committee (CHC) for the press concerning my claims of misconduct and
corruption in the CBA, published in the daily newspaper Slobodna Dalmacija in the article: "CHC: Ante Vrankovi is
right" (official letter of July 3, 2013, p. 4 (1) and Appendix 3)
The verdict of the Municipal Violation Court at Stari Grad of May 26, 2014, which states that all my conduct towards the
CBA was legally correct (see the official letter of June 10, 2014, p. 1 and Appendix)
Official report of Croatian Ombudsman of July 27, 2015 in which she states that the CBA "is delaying in taking
disciplinary actions against non-professional lawyers" (see official letter sent on August 31, 2015, p. 1, Appendix 2)
CBA`s public statement of May 2, 2013 that they have an attitude that it is impossible that a minister Miljeni worked as
a lawyer at the time when he was a minister (=violation of the law and the Code of Ethics), although the media published
the decision of the Municipal Court in Sesvete of January 5, 2012 which clearly proves that this is true (official letter of
July 20, 2013, pp. 1-2, Appendix p.1-5)

II.
The claim that "the European Commission has no general powers to intervene with the Member States" (Attachment
1/C) is an implicit insinuation because I have never asked European Commission for any intervention. The same case is with
the statement that "the Commission can not be of direct assistance in your situation" (Attachment 1/F), because I have never
asked any direct assistance from the European Commission.
What I asked, was:
Already in my official letter of October 1, 2013, p. 1, I explained that "I do not expect any of your your intervention in
this particular case" as Mr Crabit has implicitly stated, but - as I pointed out in the same letter - that I ask, that in the case of

my death in a hunger strike, of which you (European Commission) will be informed by the Croatian associations for the
protection of human rights you sand a copy of the documentation that I have sent you, to the Council of Bars and Law
Societies of Europe (CCBE) in Brussels (Rue Joseph II 40/8), as according to the law you may do, just as CCBE because of
evident crime can legally exclude the CBA from its membership, because the CBA`s officials --- that failed to resolve my 2
disciplinary reports from 2013 (because I did not gave the requested bribes to the disciplinary prosecutor Predrag Laban) and
are now sending me to death --- are already responsible for the deaths of at least 18 people in the last few years:
1. CBA victim) Jaka Denich (official letter of July 31, 2013, p. 2);
2.-6. CBA victims: Ivo Jui, Ivo Skorin and three other people in the affair of RBA savings cooperatives (official
letter of July 31, 2013, p. 2, Appendix 1-5, and official letter of October 15, 2013, p. 1);
7.-18. CBA victims: 12 people killed on Kornati for who`s death is responsible ex-president and current treasurer of
CBA Marijan Hanekovi (official letter of August 31, 2015, p. 1 (3)), about who`s crime and amoral conduct I have
informed you (EC) already in the first page of my very first letter of July 3, 2013, and also on the page 8.
- In my official letter of August 31, 2015 (p. 2) I have additionally asked you that in the case of my death you send the
copies of documents that I have sent you also on the address of: International Bar Assocaition (London) and the Union
Internationale des Avocats (Paris)
- In my letters of February 6 (p. 2), April 17 (p. 1) and August (p. 1), 2015 I have asked that the EU body for the
1
monitoring of Croatian State Attorney's Office which was reported by the Croatian media that is going to be sent to Croatia
you send in the monitoring of USKOK(BCCOC), whose systematic illegal methods are alredy known to EC from the well
known Perkovi case. In the case of my criminal report KR-US-1/13 USKOK consciously protects crime, holding my
criminal report against the officials of CBA: Predrag Laban, Leo Andreis and Robert Trava in the drawer. Report is not
rejected, but USKOK is simply not solving it.
How vast is the extent of unhidden protecting of crime by the State Attorney's Office and USKOK, can be seen from
the fact that during the period of only 120 days (14/11/2014 - 9/5/2015) Croatian media published 70 articles on various cases
2
of evident corruption in the conduct of Croatian State Attorney's Office (DORH) and USKOK. That situation is well known
to EC at least since the Perkovi case (2013-2015).
However, on my request for the monitoring of the work of USKOK on my criminal report KR-US-1/13, which I have
sent to you more than 7 months ago, I have not received a reply.
III. The claim that "the European Commission has no general powers to intervene with the Member States. It can only do
so if an issue of European Union law is involved. On the basis of the information provided in your letter, it does not appear
that the matters of which you refer are related to the implementation of EU law." (Attachment 1/C,D,E) is simply
inaccurate.
In fact, as it was publicly announced by the Croatian Helsinki Committee (CHC) in the newspapers - about which I
have informed you already on the first page of my very first official letter sent on July 3, 2013 (see in that letter Appendix 3 a newspaper article: HHO: Ante Vrankovi je u pravu = "CHC: Ante Vrankovi is right") the fact is that to me was and is
denied the right to life, which is directly guaranteed by EU law: EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Art. 2, which guarantees
the right to life.
But that fact is irrelevant, because I did not ask the EC any intervention regarding the realization of my right to life, but
monitoring of the work of Croatian State Attorney's Office and USKOK. Mr. Gunter Kirchbaum and Mr. Norbert Lammert
were warning about the necessity of that monitoring since the beginning of 2013, and that necessity was quickly confirmed
by the shocking situation in, and around Perkovi case in which "Croatia have tricked the law and the confidence of Europe"
(V. Reding), as Croatian judicial institutions are doing practically all the time (tricking the laws), sending thus consciously
every year dozens of Croatian citizens to death in suicide, as well as CBA does (see here, p. 1-2 (II.))
IV.

Incorrect is also the claim about the "repetitive character of my correspondence." (Attachment 2/H).
If we look at my letters and documents which I have sent you, it is clear that I was briefly informing you about the new
facts related to my case. I was proving these facts with official documents on corruption, which I mentioned here on p. 1
(noumbers: 1-6), and the destruction of my health: polyposis of the gallbladder, osteoporosis and subsequent double fracture

The announcement was made at: http://direktno.hr/en/2014/direkt/7838/Bruxelles-priprema-monitoring-nad-DORH-om-zbog-su%C4%91enja-Perkovi%C4%87u.htm A

similar monitoring exists in the case of Bulgaria and Romania where (Romania) it gave excellent results, so it was also proposed for Croatia by Mr. Gunter Kirchbaum in
2013, but his idea was rejected (link: http://www.vecernji.hr/hrvatska/hrvatska-nece-biti-pod-nadzorom-kao-bugarska-i-rumunjska-525649) How much this decision of the
EC was harmful and naive, was quickly shown in the situation surrounding the Perkovi case in June 2013 ("Lex Perkovic") and later (pressures on witnesses during the trial)
when Mrs Reding said: "Croatia has tricked the law and the confidence of Europe." (link: http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/reding-hrvatska-je-izigrala-zakon-i-povjerenjeeurope/700829.aspx) Actually, a lot worse thing happened: EU officials naively let Croatian politicians to deceive them by false promises, avoiding the kind of monitoring
given to Romania and Bulgaria. Because of that naive conduct of EC, the problem of Croatian citizens with corrupt judiciary remained unbearable, forcing every year few
dozens of people in Croatia to commit suicide, what I have already mentioned in my letter of September 23, 2013, p. 1.
2
Link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/248918895/%C4%8Clanci-o-razli%C4%8Ditim-slu%C4%8Dajevima-o%C4%8Dite-korumpiranosti-DORH-a-70-%C4%8Dlanaka-u-120-dana

of my leg (letter of April 17, 2015, p. 1 and Attachment: Document 1,2,5,6), - all caused by successive hunger strikes. News
do not have a "repetitive character" because if they had, nobody would be interested in them, and yet everyone is.
Moreover, in his letter of September 23, 2013 Mr. Crabit stated that: "The Commission therefore welcomes any
information deemed relevant in relation to corruptionrelated aspects" and this statement is actually contradictory to Mr
Crabit`s letter of September 1, 2015 (Attachment 2/H).
That's not so unusual, because a letter of September 1, 2015 was not hand signed by Mr Crabit (see: Attachment 2/K),
who was obviously aware of seriousness of the situation, and possibility of his (because of his refusal to make genuine effort
to understand what I was saying and to correctly and accurately inform about that the European Commission, which had the
authority to indirectly help me in the described manner (monitoring of USKOK)) and the European Commission`s
responsibility if my hunger strike ends with my death. I honestly think that such a behavior towards a hunger striker is sad.
From all the facts it is clear that quoted claims in the letter of Mr Crabit are not accurate, and that they caused the errors
which have negative effect on my rights and interests. For that reason I`ve decided, on the basis of the European Code of
Good Administrative Behaviour (=Code), Art. 12, to ask for Mr Crabit`s written apology, especially since he has, in his
communication with me, also violated at least four other articles of the same Code of Good Administrative Behaviour:
1.) Mr Crabit has not responded to anny of my letters within the prescribed period of 2 weeks, as with Art. 14 of the
Code is required. As can be seen from the dates on avises de reception of my letters, and the dates of his responses at the
links at the enf oft his official letter, Mr Crabit's replies to my letters were sent after: 1) 10 weeks, 2) 8 weeks, 3) 6 weeks, 4)
never, 5) never, 6) never, 7) never, 8) 12 weeks, 9) 29 weeks, 10) 18 weeks, 11) ?, 12) ?, from the day of receiving of my
letter, which is truly astonishing!
2.) He has not clearly stated relevant facts (claims he had stated are not accurate: see above I.-IV.), or legal basis of his
claims, and therefore he sent me a general, rather than specific answers, which is contrary to the Article 18 of the Code.
3.) No letter of Mr Crabit, not even the one from September 1, 2015 has not contained a statement of the possibilities of
appeal, in violation of Art. 19 of the Code.
4.) From all these above listed facts, is clear that the actions of Mr Crabit in my case were very superficial, probably
due to a racial discrimination which I already mentioned (my official letter of August 31, 2015, p. 1), because it is impossible
to imagine that the answers of Mr Crabit to some French or German, would be so superficial, and would be sent with so
much delay. That kind of conduct is violation of Art. 5 of the Code, which prohibits any unjustified discrimination.
Such conduct of Mr Crabit (here: p. 1-3: I.-IV. and p. 3: 1.-4.) in some moments truly looks like a deliberate mockery of
the principle of "respect for others, handling within a reasonable time, accuracy and making a genuine efforts in
3
understanding what others are saying", all defined by the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour.
Therefore, on the basis of the same Code, Art. 12, I have decided to ask for an apology for these mistakes and correcting
the negative influences that derived from them.
In fact, if Mr. Crabit was not very superficial in his communication with me, and if he had timely and accurately
informed Mrs Reding, Mrs Reicherts and you about the facts of my situation, the EC could have take steps to establish a
close monitoring of the Croatian judiciary (which was done in the case of Bulgaria, and with much success in the case of
Romania), especially of the State Attorney and USKOK/BCCOC, so the necessity of my hunger strike might have been
avoided, as well as my possible death in the strike, because the USKOK would have to start acting on my criminal report KRUS-1/13 against Laban, Andreis and Trava from the CBA, so CBA would be forced to solve my two disciplinary reports
from 2013 against lawyer Zorii (which took my sources for living and thus denied my right to life /confirmed by Croatian
Helsinki Committee/ which is a difficult violation of lawyers international ethical codes), on which to this day I have not
received any response! Thus, if the hunger strike that I have started on August 24, 2015 ends with my death, for that result
will together with P. Laban, L. Andreis and R. Trava from CBA, and Tamara Lapto and Andrea Vrancic from
USKOK/BCCOC which are ignoring my report against three officials of the CBA and thus protecting their crime - directly
be responsible Mr Emanuel Crabit, which has not timely nor accurately informed you (EC) about the facts of my case.
I hope that before or at least in the case of my death, the EC will finally listen to the advice of Mr Lammert and Mr
Kirchbaum that proved to be dramatically right in Perkovi case (2013-2015) and to establish a close monitoring of the
Croatian justice system similar to those in Romania and Bulgaria, and that the documents that I sent you, EC will send to the
Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE - Brussels), International Bar Assocaition (IBA - London) and the
Union Internationale des Avocats (UIA - Paris), and thus prevent its responsibility for the further losses of human lives!
I also hope that the European Commission will not in future give priority in Croatia only to the protecting of the interests
of capital (obvious from the special interests of the EC for improving the efficiency of Croatian commercial courts Attachment 1/G), but it will also ensure protecting of lives of Croatian citizens threatened by the judicial corruption, which
could have been limited and significantly reduced already in 2013 by establishing of close monitoring over the work of the
Croatian judiciary, as it proves positive example of Romania.
Sincerely, Ante Vrankovi (handwritten signature)
3

Link (eng): http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/resources/code.faces/en/3510/html.bookmark;jsessionid=E4B3A6703BC16C3B0D564D9FD2FBD3D8#/page/1

Potovana gospoo Jourov,

pred nekoliko dana sam iz Vaeg ureda primio odgovor na moje dopise od 6. veljae i 17. travnja ove godine, koji me
jako iznenadio, jer je g. Crabit u njemu (v. Prilog 1-2) iznio cijeli niz netonih navoda o mojem predmetu (dolje: I.-IV.).
I.
Netono je da sam ja u svojim pismima izrazio moju zabrinutost obzirom na navodnu korupciju u Hrvatskoj
odvjetnikoj komori i situaciju u hrvatskom pravosuu (Prilog 1/A).
Razlog mojeg obraanja Europskoj komisiji (EK) tj. gi Reding, Reicherts i Vama nije bila moja zabrinutost obzirom
na navodnu korupciju u Hrvatskoj odvjetnikoj komori i situaciju u hrvatskom pravosuu, nego gaenje mojeg temeljnog
prava na ivot, koje gaenje je slubeno potvrdio i Hrvatski helsinki odbor (HHO). To sam vrlo jasno (na ak 2 mjesta)
napisao ve na prvoj strani mog prvog dopisa gi Reding, poslanog 3. srpnja 2013., kojeg je - kao i svu ostalu komunikaciju
izmeu mene i EK mogue vidjeti na linku u dnu ovoga dopisa. Na taj dopis od 3. srpnja 2013. mi je 23. rujna 2013.
odgovorio g. Emmanuel Crabit, koji mi je odgovorio i u Vae ime, pa je on sigurno znao za moj dopis od 3. srpnja 2013. i
smisao mog obraanja EK. Dakle, moja pisma nisu imala za predmet openito stanje, nego moju konkretnu situaciju.
Dalje, korupcija u Hrvatskoj odvjetnikoj komori (HOK) o kojoj sam Vam pisao nije bila navodna, kako g. Crabit
tvrdi, nego stvarna i dokazana. Dokumenti koji slubeno dokazuju tu korupciju, a koje sam Vam ve poslao su sljedei:
1) Dopis naelnika zagrebake policije Zvonimira Petrovia od 18. lipnja 2012., u kojem on slubeno svjedoi da policijska
istraga nije potvrdila navode prijave Andreisa (predsjednik HOK-a) protiv mene, to je nepobitan slubeni dokaz da me
Andreis lano prijavio. O tome sam EK tj. gu Reding izvijestio ve u svojem prvom dopisu od 3. srpnja 2013., str. 4(4).
2) Dopis ravnateljice Porezne uprave Nade avlovi Smiljanec od 5. veljae 2013. u kojem mi ona potvruje da su svi, pa i
odvjetnici duni plaati porez, to je u komunikaciji samnom HOK triput slubeno negirao(sic!), a to je 2013. dovelo do
toga da hrvatski odvjetnici jedini na svijetu moraju imati fiskalne blagajne (dopis od 3. srpnja 2013., str. 4(5), i str. 7/A).
3) Slubena izjava za javnost Hrvatskog helsinkog odbora (HHO) glede mojih tvrdnji o korupciji u HOK-u, objavljena o
dnevnom listu Slobodna Dalmacija: HHO: Ante Vrankovi je u pravu (dopis od 3. srpnja 2013., str. 4(1) i Appendix 3)
4) Presuda Prekrajnog suda u Hvaru od 26. svibnja 2014. u kojoj stoji da je moje postupanje prema HOK-u zakonito (vidjeti
dopis od 10. lipnja 2014., str. 1 i Appendix)
5) Izvjetaj hrvatskog pukog pravobranitelja (ombudsmana) od 27. srpnja 2015. u kojem stoji da HOK odugovlai
disciplinske postupke protiv neprofesionalnih odvjetnika (vidjeti dopis od 31. kolovoza 2015., str. 1, Appendix 2)
6) Izjava HOK-a od 2. svibnja 2013. da HOK smatra nemoguim da je ministar Miljeni radio kao odvjetnik, u vrijeme kad
je bio ministar (ime je prekrio zakon i Kodeks odvjetnike etike), iako u medijima objavljeno Rjeenje Opinskog suda u
Sesvetama od 5. sijenja 2012. dokazuje da je to istina (dopis od 20. srpnja 2013., str. 1-2, Appendix p.1-5)
II. Tvrdnja da Europska komisija nema generalnu mo da intervenira kod drava lanica (Prilog 1/C) predstavlja
implicitnu insinuaciju (podvalu), jer ja od EK nikakvu intervenciju nikada nisam niti traio. Isto je i s tvrdnjom da Komisija
ne moe biti od direktne pomoi u mojoj situaciji (Prilog 1/F), jer ja nikakvu direktnu pomo od EK nikada nisam traio.
Ono to sam ja traio, bilo je sljedee:
- Ve u mom dopisu od 1. listopada 2013., str. 1, pojasnio sam da ja ne oekujem vau intervenciju u o ovom
konkretnom sluaju, kako g Crabit implicite tvrdi, nego - kako sam istakao na istome mjestu - da Vas molim da u
sluaju moje smrti o kojoj e Vas tj. Europsku komisiju obavijestiti hrvatske udruge za zatitu ljudskih prava - kopiju
dokumentacije koju sam Vam poslao proslijedite Vijeu komora i pravnih drutava Europe (CCBE) u Bruxellesu (Rue
Joseph II 40/8),, to po zakonu Vi smijete uiniti, isto kao to i CCBE radi otvorenoga kriminala po zakonu smije
iskljuiti HOK iz svojega lanstva, jer su HOK-ovi dunosnici --- koji nerjeavanjem moje 2 disciplinske prijave iz
2013. (jer disciplinskom tuitelju Predragu Labanu nisam dao traeni mito) sada i mene alju u smrt --- ve odgovorni
za smrt najmanje 18 ljudi u zadnjih nekoliko godina:
1. rtva) Jake Denicha (dopis od 31. srpnja 2013., str. 2);
2.-6. rtva) Ive Juia, Ive Skorina i jo troje ljudi u aferi RBA zadruga (dopis od 31. srpnja 2013., str. 2, Appendix 15, i dopis od 15. listopada, 2013. str. 1);
7.-18. rtva) 12 ljudi poginulih na Kornatima za iju smrt je odgovoran bivi predsjednik i sadanji blagajnik HOK-a
Marijan Hanekovi (dopis od 31. kolovoza 2015., str. 1(3)), a o ijem kriminalu i amoralnom radu sam Vas
obavijestio ve u mojem prvom dopisu od 3. srpnja 2013. na str. 1 i na str. 8.
U dopisu od 31. kolovoza 2015. (str. 2) zamolio sam Vas da kopije dokumentaciju koju sam Vam poslao, u sluaju
moje smrti poaljete i na adrese: International Bar Assocaition (London) i Union Internationale des Avocats (Paris)
U mojim dopisima od 6. veljae (str. 2), 17. travnja (str. 1) i 31. kolovoza (str. 1) 2015. traio sam da tijelo za
4
monitoring DORH-a koje ste po izvijeu medija odluili formirati poaljete u nadzor USKOK-a, ije su Vam
Vijest je objavljena na: http://direktno.hr/en/2014/direkt/7838/Bruxelles-priprema-monitoring-nad-DORH-om-zbog-su%C4%91enja-Perkovi%C4%87u.htm Slian
monitoring postoji u sluaju Bugarske i Rumunjske gdje je (Rumunjska) dao odline rezultate, te ga je g. Gunther Krichbaum poetkom 2013. predlagao za Hrvatsku, ali je to
odbijeno (link: http://www.vecernji.hr/hrvatska/hrvatska-nece-biti-pod-nadzorom-kao-bugarska-i-rumunjska-525649) Koliko je taj potez EK bio tetan i naivan, pokazala je
situacija oko sluaja Perkovi u lipnju 2013. (Lex Perkovi) i kasnije (pritisci na svjedoke tijekom suenja) kada je ga Reding rekla: Hrvatska je izigrala zakon i
4

sustavne nezakonite, mafijake metode odlino poznate iz sluaja Perkovi. Naime, USKOK i u sluaju moje prijave
KR-US-1/13 svjesno titi kriminal, drei moju prijavu protiv dunosnika HOK-a Predraga Labana, Lea Andreisa i
Roberta Travaa u ladici. Prijava nije odbaena, ali ju USKOK ne rjeava.
Koliko golemi su razmjeri neprikrivenog tienja kriminala od strane DORH-a i USKOK-a, pokazuje i injenica da je u
periodu od svega 120 dana (14. 11. 2014. 9. 5. 2015.) u hrvatskim medijima izalo ak 70 lanaka o razliitim
5
sluajevima oite korumpiranosti DORH-a i USKOK-a. EK je ta situacija jo od sluaja Perkovi vrlo dobro poznata.
Ipak, ja na svoj zahtjev za nadzorom rada USKOK-a na mojoj prijavi KR-US-1/13, koji sam Vam uputio pred vie od 7
mjeseci, sve do danas nisam dobio nikakav odgovor.
III. Tvrdnja da Europska komisija nema generalnu mo da intervenira kod drava lanica. Ona to moe uiniti samo kada
je pitanje prava Europske Unije po srijedi. Na temelju informacija koje ste pruili u vaem pismu, ne ini se da se stvari o
kojima referirate tiu implementacije prava EU. (Prilog 1/C,D,E) je naprosto netona.
Naime, kako je to u novinama obznanio Hrvatski helsinki odbor (HHO) a o emu sam Vas obavijestio ve na 1.
strani svojeg prvog dopisa poslanog 3. srpnja 2013. (vidjeti u tom dopisu Appendix 3 - novinski lanak: HHO: Ante
Vrankovi je u pravu radi se o tome da je meni osporeno pravo na ivot, koje je izravno zajameno pravom Europske
Unije: Poveljom Europske Unije o temeljnim pravima, l. 2, koji jami pravo na ivot.
No, to i nije bitno, jer ja od EK nisam traio nikakvu intervenciju glede ostvarenja mojeg prava na ivot, nego
monitoring rada DORH-a tj. USKOK-a, na iju potrebu su jo poetkom 2013. upozoravali gdin Gunter Kirhbaum i gdin
Norbert Lammert, a koju potrebu je ubrzo potvrdila okantna situacija oko sluaja Perkovi u kojem je Hrvatska izigrala
zakon i povjerenje Evrope (V. Reding) to hrvatske pravosudne institucije ionako stalno ine (izigravaju zakone) navodei
time svjesno svake godine po nekoliko desetaka svojih graana na suicid, a to radi i HOK (vidjeti ovdje str. 4 (II.)).
Netona je i tvrdnja o ponavljajuem karakteru moje korespondencije. (Prilog 1/H)
Ako se pogledaju moji dopisi i dokumenti koje sam Vam s njima poslao, vidi se da sam Vas ja zapravo samo kratko
izvjetavao o novim injenicama vezanim za moj sluaj. Te injenice dokazivao sam slubenim dokumentima o korupciji,
koje sam spomenuo ovdje na str. 4 (pod: 1-6), i o unitenju mojeg zdravlja: polipozi na unjaku, osteoporozi i posljedinom
dvostrukom lomu noge (dopis od 17. travnja 2015., str. 1 i Attachment: Dokument 1, 2, 5, 6), sve uzrokovano uzastopnim
trajkovima glau. Novosti nemaju ponavljajui karakter, jer da imaju, nitko ih ne bi pratio, a ipak svi to ine.
tovie, gdin Crabit je u svojem dopisu od 23. rujna 2013. istakao da Komisija zato smatra dobrodolom svaku
informaciju u vezi s pitanjima vezanim za korupciju, pa je ta tvrdnja zapravo kontradiktorna ovoj u Crabitovu dopisu od 1.
rujna 2015. (Prilog 2/H).
To i nije tako neobino, jer dopis od 1. rujna 2015. uope nije rukom potpisao g. Crabit (Prilog 2/K), koji je oito
svjestan teine situacije i mogue odgovornosti njega samog (zbog odbijanja da uloi trud u razumijevanje mojeg sluaja i da
o njemu pravovremeno i tono izvijesti EK, koja je imala ovlasti da mi na opisani nain indirektno pomogne) i EK ukoliko
moj trajk glau zavri smru. Takvo postupanje g. Crabita iskreno drim alosnim.
IV.

Obzirom da je iz svega gore navedenog jasno da citirane tvrdnje u dopisu gdina Crabita nisu injenino tone, te da su
one uzrokovale pogreke koje su negativno utjecale na moja prava i interese, odluio sam, temeljem Europskog kodeksa o
dobrom ponaanju zaposlenih u upravi, l. 12, zatraiti pisanu ispriku gdina Crabita, tim prije to je u svojoj komunikaciji
samnom on prekrio jo najmanje 4 lanaka istog Kodeksa o dobrom ponaanju zaposlenih u upravi (dalje: Kodeks):
1.) Gdin Crabit niti na jedan moj dopis nije odgovorio u propisanom roku od 2 tjedna, to je po l. 14 Kodeksa bio duan.
Kako se vidi iz datuma na dole navedenim linkovima priloenih povratnica mojih dopisa i datuma Crabitovih odgovora,
Crabit je svoje odgovore na moje dopise poslao nakon: 1) 10 tjedana, 2) 8 tjedana, 3) 6 tjedana, 4) nikada, 5) nikada, 6)
nikada, 7) nikada, 8) 12 tjedana, 9) 29 tjedana, 10) 18 tjedana, 11) ?, 12) ?, od primitka mojih dopisa, to je uistinu
zapanjujue!
2.) Nije jasno naveo relevantne injenice (injenice koje je naveo nisu tone: vidjeti gore I.-IV.), niti pravnu utemeljenost
svojih tvrdnji, aljui mi openite, a ne konkretne odgovore. Time je prekrio l. 18 Kodeksa.
3.) Nijedan dopis g. Crabita, pa ni onaj od 1. rujna 2015. nije sadravao navode o mogunosti za prigovor, ime je prekren
l. 19 Kodeksa.
4.) Iz svih ovih prekraja je jasno da je postupanje g. Crabita u mom sluaju bilo izuzetno povrno, te da je rije o rasnoj
diskriminaciji na koju sam ve upozoren (moj dopis od 31. kolovoza 2015., str. 1), jer je nemogue zamisliti da bi u
povjerenje Evrope. (link: http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/reding-hrvatska-je-izigrala-zakon-i-povjerenje-europe/700829.aspx Zapravo, desilo se neto mnogo gore, a to
je da su EU dunosnici naivno dozvolili da ih hrvatski politiari prevare svojim lanim obeanjima, izbjegavi monitoring kakav su dobile Rumunjska i Bugarska, ime je
situacija u hrvatskom pravosuu zbog okantne naivnosti EK ostala nepodnoljiva, tjerajui svake godine vie desetaka ljudi u Hrvatskoj na suicid, o emu sam Vam pisao u
mojem dopisu od 23. rujna 2013., str. 1
5
Link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/248918895/%C4%8Clanci-o-razli%C4%8Ditim-slu%C4%8Dajevima-o%C4%8Dite-korumpiranosti-DORH-a-70-%C4%8Dlanaka-u-120-dana

sluaju da mu se obratio Francuz ili Nijemac, odgovori g. Crabita bili tako povrni, te bili slani s toliko velikim
zakanjenjem, ime je prekren l. 5 Kodeksa, koji zabranjuje svaku neopravdanu diskriminaciju graana.
Ovakvo postupanje g. Crabita (ovdje: str. 4-5: I.-IV. i str. 5-6: 1.-4.) u pojedinim trenutcima doista izgleda kao namjerno
ismijavanje naela uslunosti, potovanja, razumnih vremenskih rokova, tonosti i ulaganja iskrenog napora u razumijevanje
6
graana koji mu se obraa, a na to ga sve izrijekom obavezuje Kodeksa o dobrom ponaanju zaposlenih u upravi.
Stoga temeljem istog Kodeksa, l. 12, traim ispriku za navedene pogreke i ispravku negativnih utjecaja koji su iz tih
pogreaka proizali.
Naime, da g. Crabit nije vrlo povrno odnosio prema mojoj komunikaciji i da je njezin sadraj pravodobno i tono prenio
gi Reding, gi Reicherts i Vama, EK je mogla pravodobno poduzeti korake glede uspostave bliskog monitoringa nad
hrvatskim pravosuem (to je uinjeno u sluaju Bugarske, a s vrlo mnogo uspjeha i u sluaju Rumunjske), osobito nad
DORH-om i USKOK-om, ime je mogla biti izbjegnuta nunost mojeg trajka glau, kao i moja mogua smrt u tom trajku,
jer bi USKOK morao poeti postupati po mojoj prijavi KR-US-1/13 protiv Labana, Andreisa i Travaa iz HOK-a, ime bi
HOK bio prisiljen da rijei moje dvije disciplinske prijave iz 2013. protiv odvjetnice Zorii (koja mi je na sudu oduzela
sredstva za ivot i time osporila pravo na ivot /potvrdio HHO/ to je teak etiki prekraj), a na koje prijave ja do danas
nisam dobio nikakav odgovor. Ovako, ukoliko u trajku glau kojeg sam zapoeo 24. 8. 2015. umrem, za moju e smrt, osim
P. Labana, L. Andreisa i R. Travaa iz HOK-a, te Tamare Lapto i Andreje Vrani iz USKOK-a koje ignoriranjem moje
prijave protiv trojice iz HOK-a tite njihov kriminal, naalost biti izravno odgovoran i g. Emanuel Crabit, koji Vas nije niti
pravodobno, niti tono informirao o injenicama mojega sluaja.
Nadam se da e prije ili barem u sluaju moje smrti EK napokon posluati savjet g. Lammerta i g. Krichbauma koji se
pokazao dramatino tonim ve 2013.-2015. u sluaju Perkovi, te da e uspostaviti bliski monitoring nad hrvatskim
pravosuem kakav postoji u Rumunjskoj i Bugarskoj, a dokumente koje sam poslao proslijediti Vijeu komora i pravnih
drutava Europe (CCBE - Bruxelles), International Bar Assocaition (IBA - London) i Union Internationale des Avocats (UIA
- Paris), i tako sprijeiti svoju odgovornost za nove gubitke ljudskih ivota.
Takoer se nadam da EK u Hrvatskoj nee (i) u budue prioritet davati samo zatiti interesa kapitala (o emu svjedoi
napomena g. Cabita o osobitom interesu EK za poboljanjem uinkovitosti rada trgovakih sudova Prilog 1/G), ve da e
se pobrinuti da osim kapitala titi i ivote vlastitih graana ugroenih korupcijom koju je jo 2013. uspostavom nadzora nad
radom hrvatskoga pravosua bilo kako to odlino dokazuje pozitivan primjer Rumunjske - mogue ograniiti i sprijeiti.
S potovanjem,

Ante Vrankovi (s. r.)

My complete communication with Mrs Reding`s, Mrs Reichert`s and your office is available on this direct links:
Moja kompletna komunikacija s uredima ge Reding, ge Reicherts i ge Jourove dostupna je na sljedeim linkovima:
1) Official letter sent on July 3, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/151560113/Official-Letter-to-Mrs-Viviane-Reding-EC?secret_password=1p5yx67pa83p7l7xoyd0
2) Official letter sent on July 20, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/156531350/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Viviane-Reding-sent-on-July-20-2013?secret_password=2c2s558g120j9yeakkiy
2) Appendix of the letter sent on July 20, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/156530108/APPENDIX-to-the-official-letter-sent-to-Mrs-Viviane-Reding-EC-on-July-20-2013?secret_password=21nz0f9stcb0caxt1qtu
3) Official letter sent on July 31, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/159153822/Mrs-Viviane-Reding-Official-Letter-31-7-2013?secret_password=zrq0hrbx05xhbp5rrsc
3) Appendix of the letter sent on July 31, 2013http://www.scribd.com/doc/159151573/Dodatak-APPENDIX-za-dopis-od-31-7-2013-zaMrs-Reding?secret_password=185ao92hfg2ga3to085n
4) Official letter sent on September 23, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/170378186/Dopis-g%C4%91i-Viviane-Reding-Official-letter-to-Mrs-Viviane-Reding-23-9-2013?secret_password=2i3z67zg5ocoxioa358e
I.) EC - Mr Crabit`s official letter sent on September 23(25), 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/172432050/EC-Mr-Crabit-s-official-letter-sent-on-September-25-2013?secret_password=zencnzgqc05479kvitb
5) Official letter sent on October 1, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/175822954/5-Dopis-Official-Letter-to-Mrs-Viviane-Reding-sent-on-October-1-2013?secret_password=12p45g4m16lkxelph6ey
6) Official letter sent on October 15, 2013: http://www.scribd.com/doc/175825986/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Viviane-Reding-October-15-2013?secret_password=1zpzdi8kbj2f840he9f
7) Official letter sent on June 10, 2014: http://www.scribd.com/doc/236457319/7-dopis-Mrs-Viviane-Reding?secret_password=LgraQNLsSkLGFxlKPzG1
8) Official letter sent on August 21, 2014: https://www.scribd.com/doc/238402647/1-official-letter-Mrs-Martine-Reicherts-EC-August-21-2014?secret_password=heNSsorNDOu4pTyMtpmu
II.) EC - Mr Crabit`s official letter sent on November 17, 2014: https://www.scribd.com/doc/247698439/EC-Mr-Crabit-s-official-letter-sent-on-novebner-17-2014?secret_password=c8zZw1Holq9UwY19F08U
9) Official letter sent on February 6, 2015: https://www.scribd.com/doc/260297191/Officail-letter-Mrs-Jourova-EC-Feb-6-2015?secret_password=ImKCJ314U7pYxRGGzEX9
10) Official letter sent on April 17, 2015: https://www.scribd.com/doc/263500263/2nd-official-letter-to-Mrs-V%C4%9Bra-Jourova-docx?secret_password=TnsVEz5nSZvnVG6Phlla
11) Official letter sent on August 31, 2015: https://www.scribd.com/doc/280543266/Official-letter-to-Mrs-Vera-Jourova-sent-on-Aug-31-2015?secret_password=gTTlaE7Oir7Vh5qXcHZa
III.) EC - Mr Crabit`s official letter sent on September 1, 2015: https://www.scribd.com/doc/281591112/EC-Mr-Crabit-s-official-letter-sent-on-September-1-2015?secret_password=J4Nh1EUlVE4VEiOmvgeJ
12) This official letter sent on Septebmer 18, 2015: https://www.scribd.com/doc/281592120/Official-letter-sent-on-Septebmer-18-2015?secret_password=0LHKJp5qu5qigZON2DpV

Kodeks je na linku (eng): http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/resources/code.faces/en/3510/html.bookmark;jsessionid=E4B3A6703BC16C3B0D564D9FD2FBD3D8#/page/1

Attachment 1 Prilog 1

Attachment 2 Prilog 2

Avis de rception - povratnica

10