Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Cleaning Validation
Manufacture of APIs
AS 22.1
1.
This module describes the strategy and basic requirements for validation of cleaning
procedures in the manufacture of APIs and intermediates in order to avoid chemical
and microbiological contamination.
The preparation of a cleaning validation master plan, a worst case concept and matrix
approach are included, together with acceptance criteria, minimum number of cleaning
runs, preparation of validation protocols and report are also described.
2.
Third Party
Responsibilities
Definitions
None
4.
Requirements
4.1
Process Summary
Chapter
4.3
Identify Materials
Equipment and Cleaning
Procedures in Use
4.3
4.4
4.4
Approve Cleaning
Validation Master Plan
Resp.
Ref.
B
C
Cleaning Validation
Master Plan
Plan Cleaning
Validation
required?
Yes
4.6
4.6
Approve Cleaning
Validation Protocol
No
Perform Cleaning
according to SOP
Material and
Equipment cleaned
Cleaning Validation
Protocol
Perform Cleaning
according to SOP
2.15
Chapter
Resp.
Ref.
Equipment visually
clean?
Yes
Closed Equipment?
No
Yes
Perform
Rinses
No
No
Perform Swab
Analyse Samples
Produce Deviation
Report
Requirements for whole
Equip. Chain met?
Review Cleaning
Procedures
Yes
No
Validation Runs
complete?
Yes
4.7
4.7
Approve Cleaning
Validation Report
Cleaning
Validation Report
Archive Validation
Documentation
Cleaning Procedures in
place and validated
Version:
3.15
4.2
General Requirements
Changes can influence the validation status. To control these changes, change control
procedures must be in place. Revalidation may be necessary, if a new worst case is
introduced or the cleaning procedure is changed.
4.3
Risk
Assessment
4.15
Matrix
Approach
The same may be applied for equipment, i.e. groups of similar or equivalent
equipments can be treated as a matrix and grouped according to risk assessment (same
material, size, complexity, configuration etc.)
The critical parameters that are used to select the products from each group that make
the worst case are (list non exhaustive):
5.15
applied.
Micro biological Contamination:
Micro biological contamination is possible if the last cleaning step is performed with
water or mixtures of organic solvents with water. For equipment which is cleaned by
refluxing organic solvents the risk of relevant contamination is minimal.
4.4
The need for training, particularly for new processes or e.g. manual cleaning steps
must be assessed and executed.
4.4.1
Cleaning Procedures
6.15
Sampling Methods
Rinse Samples
Rinse samples are used for closed equipment or difficult to access equipment.
Wherever possible the entire equipment train or equipment module is boiled out with
an appropriate solvent. Equipment that cannot be heated is rinsed through with the
same solvent, preferably hot.
Swab Samples
Where solvent rinsing is not possible direct surface sampling with swabs is used based
on a risk assessment. If various areas of specific equipment are swabbed then the
highest residue is used to calculate the contamination. These individual equipment
results are combined with the rinse samples to give the residual contamination left in
the entire plant.
For cleaning validation studies swabbing of solvent rinsed equipment is carried out
where possible, to confirm the validity of rinse samples.
7.15
4.4.4
The acceptance criteria for the cleaning procedures are to be defined before performing
the cleaning validation. Criteria will include the acceptable amounts of chemical (APIs,
intermediates, detergents, disinfectants) and micro biological (microbial and biological)
contaminants.
Cleaning Limits
The limits of these contaminants are:
Primarily the equipment must be visually clean. If not a deviation report must be
issued and follow up action decided.
Final API Purification
The last step in the API purification process is defined as being immediately after the
isolation equipment used to separate the crystalline product from its crystallisation
mother liquors or appropriate purification procedures. This is immediately after the
final centrifuge, nutsche or nutsche dryer.
Dedicated
Equipme
nt
Dedicated equipment must be visually clean and must meet the microbiological
requirements (if applicable).
The contamination by highly toxic (allergenic, cytostatic, hormone, mutagenic or
teratogenic properties) compounds in the following compound must be no more
than 10 ppm .
The minimum therapeutic dose should be estimated for development substances
that are not yet fully characterized regarding their potency.
Additional assumptions are to be considered for the calculation of the limits:
the entire residue (worst contamination found calculated for total surface area of
equipment module) of the previous product in the processing equipment will
contaminate one batch of the following product (worst case assumption). The
acceptable contamination at each product changeover should be calculated on the
basis of batch size of the following product, or on the basis of the minimum batch
size manufactured on the respective equipment. The complete calculation, with all
the assumptions made, must be documented.
The minimum therapeutic dose (lowest single dose produced) and the unit dose
(highest single dose produced e.g. In case if there are three strengths, e.g., 10mg,
20mg & 30mg Tablets, single dose means 30mg) are required for the
calculation of cleaning limits.
Carry-over of detergents/disinfectants must be no more than 10 ppm within the
next batch of API manufactured in the equipment. A limit of 100 ppm is accepted
if supported by respective safety data of the detergent/disinfectant (e.g. Acute
Toxicity).
8.15
9.15
Equipment must be qualified, computerized systems used for CIP / COP must be
validated and qualification / validation documentation approved. The design of the
concerned equipment must be fully established, especially the contact surface area and
its material must be known. The equipment / facilities concerned must be examined
carefully with respect to the contact surface area. The areas hardest to clean must be
identified. The total contact surface area must be known before performing the
validation.
10.15
Cleaning
Procedure
Personnel
N4.1
Analytical
Procedure
N15.3
Any analytical procedures used in the validation study must be validated. The
analytical procedures must be challenged in combination with the sampling methods
used in order to show that the contaminants can be recovered from the equipment
surface and to show the level of recovery as well as the consistency of recovery. This is
necessary before any conclusions can be drawn based on the analysis of the samples.
Method
Challenge
Recovery rates should be established for samples of the concerned API / intermediate.
The recovery rate from the concerned equipment materials (e.g. stainless steel, glass,
Teflon, plastics) which have contact with the API / intermediate or detergent /
disinfectant should be determined. The recovery tests may be conducted with material
plates, not on the equipment itself. Grouping may be applied based on risk assessment.
The recovery rate from the material plate should exceed 50 %. Otherwise the sampling
procedure and/or the swab material / rinse solution should be optimised. If it is not
possible to reach higher recovery values than 50 % the use of the sampling procedure
has to be explained in the validation protocol or report, or the method must be
replaced
All recovery tests should be conducted in triplicate at least. The lowest recovery is used
as correction factor when calculating the contamination (i.e., if the swab sampling is
found to recover 50%, the correction factor for the actual equipment swab samples
would be 2).
Intervals
The intervals between production and cleaning and between cleaning and use should
be considered to ensure that the validation study covers the worst case occurring for
the respective equipment / facilities.
Documents for cleaning validation e.g. cleaning validation master plan, site cleaning
policy, equipment cleaning procedures must be available and approved prior to
conducting cleaning validation activities.
All cleaning procedures which are applied to a specific process, product, system or an
item of equipment must be described and evaluated. Any decision to validate must be
based on a thorough risk analysis, and the decision must be taken by Quality
Assurance and Production.
11.15
4.6
A validation protocol must be available prior to conducting the validation study and
must be authorized by Production and QA. The cleaning validation protocol must
cover the following topics:
Scope
Sampling Procedures
The sampling must follow a rationalised plan to fully characterise the cleaning process
for validation purposes. The sampling procedures used (i.e. rinsing and / or direct
surface sampling by swabbing) should be determined based on their suitability,
considering the accessibility of the equipment contact surface area and the solubility of
the contaminant in the rinse solution. For cleaning validation studies, swabbing should
be carried out on all major items of equipment after they have been boiled or rinsed
out with solvent, e.g. reactors, filters, and dryers. These swab results are to
demonstrate that the equipment is acceptably clean and confirm the validity of the
rinse sample results.
Analytical / Microbiological Procedures
Reference to the analytical / microbiological/endotoxin procedures used for analyzing
API / intermediate, detergent / disinfectant, and microbiological contamination are to
be given together with their validation status. For the measurement of active
Cleaning Validation Manufacture of APIs
Date of Issue: March, 2007 Edition 01
12.15
ingredients, in non dedicated plants, a selective method should be used (i.e., HPLC,
GC, CE) while measurement of the cleaning agent may utilise either a selective method
or a non selective method (for example TOC). The sensitivity of the analytical
procedures must assure that the limit of quantification is suitable to meet the
acceptance criteria for the train of equipment.
Key
Acceptance
criteria
Validation activities can be considered functionally complete when all raw data has
been generated, reviewed and found acceptable. This determination is to be
documented in the cleaning validation report. The cleaning validation report is to
cover the following topics:
Documentation of validation activities performed. It presents all pertinent findings and
conclusions, especially the validation status. Any deviation from the protocol or from
the acceptance criteria is to be described and rationalised, and consequence on
validation stated.
Description of Tests carried out / Expected Results
Reference to the respective validation protocol should be given, and the acceptance
criteria together with their limits are to be stated.
Detailed Summary of Results
The result of all tests is to be summarized for all contaminants considered including the
results of failed tests. The reference to all raw data must be provided.
Additional Tests / Deviations
All deviations and changes that occurred during the validation must be reviewed and
approved. Deviations in the analytical laboratory (out-of-specification (OOS) test)
must be subject to investigations according to applicable SOPs.
Review / Comparison of Results
The obtained results must be reviewed in regard to validation ranges of critical
cleaning parameters and acceptance criteria. The results should be compared with the
expected values. The outcome of the investigation performed for any deviation or
analytical OOS results must be reviewed, the effects on the product quality must be
discussed and the appropriate conclusions drawn.
Acceptance / Rejection Decision
The acceptance / rejection decision is to be stated after all activities are completed,
including any corrective actions and repetitions.
Conclusion / Recommendations
Recommendations for the extent of routine testing after cleaning, interval between
production and cleaning, interval between cleaning and use, and campaign length
Cleaning Validation Manufacture of APIs
Date of Issue: March, 2007 Edition 01
13.15
should be stated on the basis of experience of the cleaning runs performed during the
validation. Criteria for re-validation should be specified. This report must be approved
by Quality assurance and the VMP amended accordingly.
4.8
Re-Validation
Purpose
To maintain the validation status of a cleaning procedure despite planned changes to
the cleaning procedure, the equipment / facilities or the APIs / intermediates may need
revalidation.
Description
There are two types of re-validation, periodic routine evaluation of validation status
and re-validation if necessary and re-validation due to a change or due to observations
in the annual product review. The kind of re-validation considered should be stated
and the reason for it. Periodic routine evaluation of validation status is performed by
on-going monitoring or analysis of samples following each cleaning after either a
defined time or a defined number of production campaigns. The degree of revalidation due to a change or an observation in the annual product review should be
based on the risk assessment of the change / observation regarding the quality
characteristics.
Variables to be monitored
Re-validation may not need to cover all variables monitored in the initial validation
study, depending on the results of the risk-assessment. Evaluation of the influence of
the change observed on the cleaning efficiency determines what variables require
monitoring. The validation documentation for re-validation is to be established in the
same way as for the initial validation. The variables/systems not considered in the revalidation should be stated together with the reason for not monitoring them.
5.
Change Control
Changes to any aspect of the above described process must be authorised through a
formal change control procedure. This should include also quality and regulatory
issues.
14.15
Changes that may have an influence on the API / intermediate quality could be for
example:
6.
Annexes
None
15.15