Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Homeworkping.com
Homework Help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Online Tutoring
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Committees
Recommendation on the
Replacement of Mr. Ashok
735 Words
Contents
Situation Analysis:...................................................................................................... 2
Priorities for the Role:................................................................................................. 3
Analysis of the Profile:................................................................................................ 4
Performance Evaluation:............................................................................................. 5
Situation Analysis:
Mr. Ashok, General-Shift-in-Charge of Sparkling Glass Limited (SGL) is to retire in a
few months. He is the general shift supervisor and he also looks after production
planning, scheduling and costing. As the members committee we are given with the
responsibility to identify a suitable replacement for Mr. Ashok.
Options:
To find a replacement for Mr. Ashok from the profiles of four other shift-incharges: Mr. Khanna, Mr. Punjabi, Mr. Gupta and Mr. Gulati
To extend the tenure of Mr. Ashok
To recruit a new person
E
R
Y
A
P
S
C
O
M
N
s
c
e
t
r
o
x
p
o
s
w
.h
t
il
d
t
e
a
g
u
id
R
r
K
P
G
n
c
n
e
h
u
d
e
t
g
c
S
a
n
ilp
im
r
jh
t
a
n
e
o
iu
n
a
t
g
n
g
f
a
ib
it
A
n
P
s
f
ild
h
i
a
n
o
r
v
n
k
i
n
'c
A
id
h
s
s
u
n
a
h
a
g
r
T
lo
g
e
k
e
n
r
s
u
o
r
l
e
e
s
Punjabi
Gupta
Gulati
5 years
12 years
3 years
5 years
3 years
12 years
3 years
1 year
Total
Experience
Company
Experience
Qualificatio
n
Costing**
Glass Technologist.
Completed 1 year
course in
Management.
Undergoing a
course on
production
planning and
management
Good Glass
Technologist.
Good with
numbers and
planning.
Diploma in
Glass
Technology.
Other
qualification
through
correspondenc
e courses.
Diploma.
No
No
No
No
Planning**
Yes
No
Yes
No
Scheduling
**
No
No
Yes
No
Communica
Good
tion Skills*
Average
Average
Average
Training
Skills*
None
Good
None
None
Poor
Good
Poor. ( Barely
Adequate)
Good
Good
None
None
None
Below Average
Average
Average
Above Average
Employee
Relationshi
p*
Customer
Relationshi
p*
Productivity
Performance Evaluation:
All the candidates will be evaluated on the scale of five. Each Attribute is given with
the special weight-age based on the order of priority required for the role. For
instance, Costing is given with a weight-age of four since it is the most required skill
for the role. A person is rated based on the following considerations,
1- Person has no idea about the skill.
2- Person has knowledge about the skill or if a person has a bad experience
3- Person has relevant experience or educational background relating to the
attribute.
4- Person has achieved in relation to the attribute.
5- Person is exceptional in that attribute with significant achievements.
Mr. Khanna:
Table 1: Kanna's performansfs;ldjf
Attributes
Costing
Weightage
4
Maximu
m
Rating
5
Rati
ng
2
3
3
5
5
3
2
3
2
5
5
2
3
Production
Planning
Scheduling
Employee
Relationship
Experience
Productivity
Technology
Comments
No Relevant Experience
Currently doing an evening
course on production
planning.
No Relevant Experience
Attitude towards the workers
is not really good
Has Relevant Experience
Does not put extra hours for
the job
Glass Technologist,
Completed 1 year course in
Management
Overall
Rating
2.55
Mr. Khanna is the most qualified person among the four. He is good with
communication and he was able to sort out a customer complaint with his skills.
However, his performance has deteriorated in the last one year for unknown
reasons. He does not put in extra hours required for the job. Further, his attitude
towards the workers is not very good.
Mr. Punjabi:
Mr. Punjabi is the most experienced person among four. He is a good trainer and
maintains a good relationship with workers and management. However, he has less
qualification when compared to the others preferred for this role.
Table 2;e';lst'ls
Weightage
4
Maximu
m
Rating
5
Rati
ng
2
3
3
5
5
2
2
Employee
Relationship
Experience
Productivity
Technology
2
3
5
5
3
2
Attributes
Costing
Production
Planning
Scheduling
Comments
No Relevant Experience
No Relevant Experience
No Relevant Experience
He is a good trainer and
gets along with the workers
well.
Has around 12 years of
experience in the same
company.
Average and no instance of
putting extra effort.
Has Diploma.
Overall
Rating
2.85
Mr. Gupta:
Attributes
Costing
Production
Planning
Scheduling
Weightag
e
Maximu
m Rating
Rati
ng
Comments
3
3
5
5
4
4
Good in Planning
Good in Scheduling
Employee
Relationship
Experience
Productivity
Technology
2
3
5
5
3
3
Overall
Rating
3.05
Mr. Gulati:
Mr. Gulati has ability to learn and grasp well. He also maintains good employee
relationship and has the capability to handle tense situation. He also puts extra
hours across shifts whenever required. However, he is new to the company. He does
not have hands on experience on planning and scheduling.
Attributes
Costing
Production
Planning
Scheduling
Employee
Relationship
Experience
Productivity
Technology
Weightag
e
4
Maximu
m
Rating
5
Rati
ng
2
3
3
5
5
2
2
3
2
5
5
4
3
2
3
Overall
Rating
5
5
5
2
Comments
No Relevant Experience
No Relevant Experience
No Relevant Experience
He has solved the critical
labour problem
Has Relevant Experience
He is exceptional and puts
in extra hours that job
demands
Diploma
2.7
Other Alternatives:
Retaining Mr. Ashok:
Mr. Ashok has hands on experience in the role for many years. He was not
responsible for the loss incurred by the company in the past two years. However, his
tenure cannot be extended for a longer duration as it is a short term remedy and it
will also incur more expense to the company.
Recommendations:
From the above analysis it is evident that none of them posses all the required skills
preferred for the profile. Since SGL is anticipating profit for the current year, the
committee strongly recommends extending Mr. Ashoks tenure by 6 months. After 6
months the committee suggests Mr. Gupta for Mr. Ashoks replacement based on
the performance evaluation. The committee also recommends Mr. Ashok to train Mr.
Gupta during this interim period.