Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Needs Analysis
Performance and product reviews:
Students at the University of Phoenix take an end of course survey at the end of each course. The
current data shows that first and second year instructors are receiving poor scores from their
student surveys. Many of the notes on the surveys consist of similar concerns with facilitators in
this scenario:
Students feel that their instructors are not accurately using the learning
management system
Students feel that they are not receiving timely and comprehensive feedback
Students feel their instructor does not have a strong online presence and is not
available to them when needed
Observations:
Outside observation experts were contracted to sit in on local campus class visits to observe
student and faculty behaviors. Student and faculty online conversations were tracked, monitored
and evaluated for both online and local campus instructors.
Local Campus Feedback
Instructors appeared to be uncomfortable using many of the technology in the face to face
classroom settings
Instructors often had trouble communicating effectively and accurately during instruction
Students felt lost and confused and unsure of next steps at times
Facilitators were often on able to reason through best fit scenarios, actions plans etc.
Online Feedback:
Instructors were posting materials, discussion and feedback in the wrong locations on the
student website
Instructors were posting incomplete feedback without much clarity or direction
Students were waiting for private feedback longer than a 48 hour period
Instructors were providing feedback late without mush time for students to set
expectations or make corrections
Questionnaires:
Faculty members would express concern using learning management system on faculty
questionnaire sheets.
Informal Interactions with colleagues and supervisors:
Faculty members would share their frustrations with their peers voicing concerns about the
online learning system, the student demographic and difficulty conforming instructional
strategies to fit a diverse pool of students, and wanting more guidance or training to help them
become better acclimated to the system and more comfortable facilitating instruction in both
online and on campus settings.
Fringe Benefits
External Staff
Materials
Technical Support
Equipment
Travel
Facilities
Supplies
Miscellaneous
Explanation
Stipend for Lead Faculty
Trainers per cycle one. Two
trainers need for 6 month
period. 1000 stipend per
month per trainer
Work phone, vehicle for
travel, computer etc.
Observational experts
contracted for needs analysis
Web-Ex material, work
computers and resources all
Employer Provided
Employer Provided
Projector, laptop computers
and computer equipment,
software, hardware
Trainer travel expensesperiodic (flight, rental cars,
gas, hotels, meals etc.)
Participant travel to
conference workshop once
during cycle one (flights,
meals, hotels x 20
participants)
Hotel Conference Rooms
Pins, paper pencils, snacks,
etc.
Budget Amount
12000
10,000
5,000
0
0
7,000
20,000
40,000
3,000
1000
1000
Staffing Plan:
The staffing plan for the University of Phoenix Faculty Mentorship Training Program will
consist of a very simple roster. Since the training program only consists of 20 participants or less
during each cycle the program only has a need for two trainers/program coordinators. These two
program directors serve as primary points of contacts and organizers of the program. The two
selected will need to meet all of the requirements that a participant in the training meets (have a
minimum of a masters degree from an accredited university, at least 5 years of experience in the
field of study, a minimum of three years of instructional experience at the University of Phoenix
five years or more preferred). In addition, a qualified candidate for the Program
Coordinator/Trainer position will need to have served or be currently serving in a fulltime
leadership academic position at the university (College Chair Person, Dean, and Provost etc.)
Candidates must possess the following:
Strong interpersonal skills and communication skills
Strong presentation skills
Must be highly familiar with the current Learning Management System
Must be highly fluent of instructional strategies and instructional design for diverse
students
Must be able to travel a minimum of once per month
Must have strong computer skills and be familiar with specific computer software and
materials
STAKEHOLDERS AND GOALS WORKSHEET
Stakeholder
University of
Phoenix CEO
Trainer/Program
Coordinator
Mentorship
Training
Participants
Novice
Instructors/Mentee
University of
Phoenix students
Communication Plan:
software. They will become more comfortable as they grow in their tenure teaching a diverse set
of learners. Benefits include constant sense of support in their roles by always having someone to
reference for questions or concerns and to celebrate success. Mentees in the program can
eventually go on to complete the program as well to share the experience and expertise as it is
accomplished overtime.
Students will benefit because they will be guaranteed to have learning encounters with better
equipped facilitators and learning should be more effective overtime. Student experiences will be
more valuable and lead to increased student success overtime.
The University of Phoenix will benefit as a whole because they impact of more quality
instruction will improve the universitys image and credibility overtime. As instructors improve
in their skill sets, students will have better classroom encounters and the university will continue
to thrive.
Program Marketing Methods:
Introduce mentor program to new faculty members during their initial certification
courses and training
Post flyers in faculty resource centers as well as local student resource centers around
campus and inside of classrooms
Bring flyers to faculty meetings when held or make announcements
Post flyers, announcements, participant qualifications and application deadline
information for the program to faculty sharing websites and social media (Facebook,
Twitter, LinkedIn, SharePoint etc.)
Host informationals to discuss the details of the program and offer incentives to get
potential participants excited about the event and encourage them to attend
Leader in the Academic department will make specific recommendations to those they
see to be qualified for or that would make a good fit for the program.
Periodic emails will be sent out to inform faculty of the program
Emails will be sent to inform all University staff of the program and program benefits
Program Evaluation:
The Program Directors/Trainers will be responsible for measuring the overall program
evaluation. The evaluation is intended to measure the effectiveness of the training and how well
it prepares tenured instructors to work as mentors. In addition, it measures how effectively the
mentorship program impacted instruction as a whole as well as how much more confident and
comfortable new instructors felt delivering instruction and using the tools and materials at their
leisure. The primary purpose for evaluation is to ensure that the program is designed
appropriately for the cause and to consider recommendations for improvement to the program in
the future if needed.
Evaluation Types:
Student Surveys will be evaluated during the analysis stage as well as after the
entire training program cycle ends to measure a difference in student encounters
and feedback regarding earlier concerns addressed.
o Instructor feedback and availability/online and local campus presence and
support
o Instructor use of website, tools and technology
End of program exams will be given for certification at the end of the first cycle.
Participants will complete a brief survey at the close of the survey to specify their
readiness for their roles as mentors and to imply any suggested changes or
concerns with the program design/trainer/training etc.
o Comprehensive exam of all material covered during the six month cycle
o 3-5 question survey to be completed directly after the exam
o Feedback and notes page provided for additional considerations and
comments
Faculty surveys will be conducted prior to mentorship cycle two and at the end of
the mentorship cycle two (after the second six month period that the newly
certified mentor works together with his/her mentee). The surveys will brief with
a maximum of 3-5 questions and have a notes section for additional feedback.
o Continued follow up with mentors and mentees on success, concerns areas
of opportunity etc.
o Performance goals will be established and measured as to how they were
achieved
o Once goals have been mastered a new set of goals are established and
measured to keep consistent development gradually monitored
o Mentees will report goals success and concerns to mentor, mentor will
report information to program trainers and trainers will evaluate
effectiveness in behaviors and techniques.
Throughout each phase of data collection, the Program Coordinators/Trainers will thoroughly
evaluate the notes and details to look for trends in feedback and to measure comparative data
from one scope to the next. If enhancements are needed those will be included in a timely
fashion but definitely by the start of the next cycle one new team of participants.