THE FORD PINTO CASE

The Ford Pinto, a compact car produced in 1970s,

became notorious for its tendency in rear-end
collisions to leak fuel and explode into flames
More than two dozen people killed or injured in
Pinto fires before the company issued a recall to
correct the problem
Pinto was rushed into production to meet the
intense competition from Volkswagen and other
small car manufacturers
Potential danger of ruptured fuel tanks in
preproduction crash tests was already discovered
by the engineers

LOOKING THROUGH A MODERN

LENS
With growing understanding of how cognitive
biases distort the ethical decision making, we
come to a different conclusion
Executives involved in Pinto decision thought it
to be entirely a business decision rather then an
ethical one, taken with the help of cost-benefit
analysis- if cost of recall is higher than the
potential lawsuit you get the green signal
Such
ethical fading, a phenomenon first
described by Ann Tenbrunsel and David Messick,
takes ethics out of the consideration and even
increases unconscious unethical behaviour

ILL-CONCEIVED GOALS
At Sears in 1990s, management gave automotive
mechanics a goal of $147 an hour-presumably to
increase the speed of repairs
Rather then working faster, employees met the
goal by overcharging for their services and
repairing things that werent broken

UNETHICAL BILLING PRACTICES

The pressure at accounting, consulting and law
firms to maximize billable hours create similar
perverse incentive system with unnecessary and
expensive projects and creating book-keeping to
meet the goal
Organizations
have tried to make billing
transparent by providing specific codes to each
activity
Research shows that as the uncertainty involved
in completing a task increases, the guesswork
involved becomes more unconsciously self-serving

RECENT FINANCIAL CRISIS

At the heart of the problem was Clinton
administrations desire to increase home
ownership
It promoted paper thin down payments and
pushed for ways to get lenders to give mortgage
loans to first time buyers with shaky financing
and incomes
They never meant to inspire unethical behaviour
but by failing to take into account the effects of
the goals and reward systems they created, they
did