Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc. Doc.

80
Order Form (01/2005) Case 1:07-cv-05081 Document 80 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 1 of 1

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Sitting Judge if Other


or Magistrate Judge than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 07 C 5081 DATE 12/21/2007


CASE Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson, P.C., et al
TITLE

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Discovery conference convened. Motion to compel [61] granted in part and denied in part. Mr. Harris’s
cross motion to compel [69] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order
regarding privileged e-mail [72] entered and continued for further response on 1/8/2008. Date for Plaintiff’s
response to Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [49] extended to 1/3/2008. Parties to advise
the court no later than 1/3/2008 of a proposed protocol for mediation of this dispute.

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

1:37

STATEMENT
Discovery conference convened.

Motion to compel [61] is granted in part and denied in part: By agreement, Harris will produce all
communications relating to possible infringement of the Harris patents, if those communications were created
while Harris was at Fish & Richardson, other than communications that are subject to the attorney-client
privilege. Fish & Richardson will thereafter identify which of the targets or potential targets are Fish clients.

Harris will furnish the date on which his attorney/client relationship with the Niro firm began. In addition,
Harris will provide unredacted agreements between Mr. Harris and his assignees. If review of those
documents does not provide necessary information, Fish & Richardson will have leave to renew this motion.

Mr. Harris’s cross motion to compel [69] is granted in part and denied in part. Fish & Richardson agrees to
disclose any communications from the firm’s counsel to Mr. Harris himself.

Plaintiff’s motion for protective order [72] entered and continued for further response on 1/8/2008.

Date for Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [29] extended to 1/3/2008.

Parties to advise the court no later than 1/3/2008 of a proposed protocol for mediation of this dispute.

Courtroom Deputy ETV


Initials:

07C5081 Illinois Computer Research, LLC vs. Fish & Richardson, P.C., et al Page 1 of 1

Dockets.Justia.com

Potrebbero piacerti anche