PLASMOTEKK

REPORT

TM

UNIVERSAL FUEL OPTIMISER

[U.F.O.] APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT MOTOR

l
VEHICLE FUEL SAVING /REDUCTION
Summary Fuel Reduction Results
TOTAL AVERAGE FUEL REDUCTION:

44.12%
th

th

March 15 - March 18 2014

MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE REGISTRATION NUMBER: QLD 494-TRN

MAZDA 6GT TEST

Factory Fuel Range BEFORE

:
Plasmotekk Fuel Range AFTER :

MAZDA 6GT TEST

44.29% FUEL SAVING PER 130km

8.81 L/100 km : 703 km / 62 L Tank
4.90 L/100km : 1263 km / 62 L Tank

58.04% FUEL SAVING PER 130km

Factory Fuel Range BEFORE

:
Plasmotekk Fuel Range AFTER :

8.81 L/100 km : 703 km / 62 L Tank

3.67 L/100km : 1676 km / 62 L Tank

MAZDA 6GT TEST

36.29% FUEL SAVING PER 200km

Factory Fuel Range BEFORE

:
Plasmotekk Fuel Range AFTER :

7.74 L/100 km : 801 km / 62 L Tank

4.93 L/100km : 1257 km / 62 L Tank

MAZDA 6GT TEST

37.89% FUEL SAVING PER 200km

Factory Fuel Range BEFORE

:
Plasmotekk Fuel Range AFTER :

7.74 L/100 km : 801 km / 62 L Tank

4.80 L/100km : 1290 km / 62 L Tank

MAZDA Vehicles Supplied By OLDMAC MAZDA, Brisbane Australia

Plasmotekk Report Index Of Contents

TM

BRIEF

TEST

TEST

PLASMOTEKK DRAMATIC MOTOR VEHICLE

PLASMOTEKK DRAMATIC MOTOR VEHICLE

FUEL REDUCTION BRIEF.
FUEL REDUCTION BRIEF...(i)

MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST-1 INTRODUCTION....... 1

(i)

PART 1 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 1

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE.... 2

(ii)

PART 2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 1

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE.. 6

(iii)

PART 3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 1

SUMMARY COMPARATIVE OF BEFORE & AFTER
CONSUMPTION RATES OBTAINED...... 11

MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST-2 INTRODUCTION... 15

(i)

PART 1 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 2

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE......16

(ii)

PART 2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 2

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE... 20

(iii)

PART 3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 2

SUMMARY COMPARATIVE OF BEFORE & AFTER
CONSUMPTION RATES OBTAINED.. 25

Plasmotekk Report Index Of Contents

TM

TEST

(i)

MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST-3 INTRODUCTION........ 29

PART 1 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 3
METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE.... 30

TEST

(ii)

PART 2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 3

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE..... 35

(iii)

PART 3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 3

SUMMARY COMPARATIVE OF BEFORE & AFTER
CONSUMPTION RATES OBTAINED... 41

MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST-4 INTRODUCTION........ 45

(i)

PART 4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 4

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE....... 46

(ii)

PART 4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 4

METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS
WERE OBTAINED AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] PLATES
DEVICE WERE FITTED TO MAZDA 6GT TEST VEHICLE... 51

(iii)

PART 4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE TEST 4

SUMMARY COMPARATIVE OF BEFORE & AFTER
CONSUMPTION RATES OBTAINED.... 57

DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES

REPORT

PLASMOTEKK

TM

UNIVERSAL FUEL OPTIMISER [U.F.O.]

APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL REDUCTION

E.M. Seewald March 2014

INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 1
Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates were fitted to a new Mazda 6GT Vehicle provided by OLDMAC Mazda
Brisbane QLD, for the purpose of testing Dramatic Fuel Reduction of the vehicle. While Reduction of
Toxic Emissions to Zero was not a part of the test, It is a known factor that Dramatic Fuel Reduction
brings to Zero / almost Zero, Toxic Emissions by burning all usual poisonous gases in the process of
Internal Combustion within Petrol, Diesel or Gas driven engines.
b
INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 2
The Mazda Factory Fuel Consumption Specifications are displayed on a sticker on the windscreen.
Re Sample of Mazda Factory Fuel &CO2 Specs on windscreen as defined by ADR81/02:

1 & 2. Mazda 6GT Factory Fuel Mileage & CO2 Details Defined by ADR81/02

Simplification Of Govt Regulation ADR81/02:

The exact nature of testing dictated by Australian Design Rules ADR 81/02 Fuel Consumption Labelling for
Light Vehicles, to be specific. It draws its procedures from United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
(UN ECE) Regulations. The Vehicle travels nowhere. It goes for a 20 minute spin on a chassis dynamometer the same kind of rolling test bench used to measure power (kW) and torque (Nm) figures. Courtesy
www.motoring.com.au
(i)

INTRODUCTORY BRIEF / POINT 3

(i)

(ii)

The Plasmotekk fuel consumption test was calculated with REAL LOAD and REAL ROAD
Conditions including Wind Resistance for hundreds of kilometres over 8hours of actual
Road Driving. Plasmotekk achieved a dramatic Fuel Reduction above and beyond the
Fuel Consumption officially defined by Mazda.
Please Note: Although Emissions was not part of the Fuel Consumption Test, Windscreen
readings of 172 for CO2 are higher for any vehicle under Real Load, and Real Driving
Conditions. Plasmotekks dramatic on road fuel reduction implies far lower CO2 and CO,
emissions including Nox, Sox NO2 & SO2 which are the most poisonous gas emissions,
and the most difficult to reduce. OLDMAC MOTORS became involved because the Level of
Dramatic Fuel and Toxic Emissions Reduction defined in other Plasmotekk applications
was Unique to Plasmotekk, formalised in other reports of the last 25 years including the
California Clean Airboard / ETS report sigged off by Charles F Sanders a world authority
on emission. Oldmac wanted to establish fuel reduction and investigate Zero Toxic
Emissions at a later stage.

INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 4
(i)

(ii)

The method by which the Dramatic Fuel Reduction Test was conducted was simply to
look at Comparison of the Fuel Consumption Before the vehicle was Driven with no
Device fitted, and the Fuel Consumption After the Nano Plate Device was fitted to the
Mazda vehicles along the same routes for the same distances, and same times of day.
Mazda vehicles also Engaged the Air Conditioning of the Vehicle at ALL TIMES during the
Before & After Testing periods, and same 2 people with same weight conducted all tests.

NB: INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 5

(i)
(ii)

The Following tabulation documents the method by which Before and After 4
Comparative Fuel Consumption Rate Tests of the Mazda 6GT were recorded and collated.
The Method by which all work was recorded were in the 3 Parts shown below:

(iii)

PART A: Method By which the Before Tests were Conducted / 1 Run Without Plates
PART B: Method By which the After Tests were Conducted / 2 Runs With Plates
PART C: Method By which the Comparative Results of Before & After were Tabled
st

th

Test 1 is: 1 Run BEFORE Plates to Helensvale Brisbane Helensvale - 130km

/ 15 March
st
th
1 Run AFTER Plates to Helensvale Brisbane Helensvale - 130km
/ 16 March
st
th
Test 2 is: 1 SAME Run BEFORE Plates to Helensvale Brisbane Helensvale - 130km / 15 March
nd
th
2 Run AFTER Plates to Helensvale Brisbane Helensvale - 130km
/ 17 March
st
th
Test 3 is: 1 Run BEFORE Plates to Tugun Ballina Tugun - 200km
/ 15 March
st
th
1 Run AFTER Plates to Tugun Ballina Tugun - 200km
/ 16 March
st
th
Test 4 is: 1 SAME Run BEFORE Plates to Tugun Ballina Tugun 200km
/ 15 March
nd
th
2 Run AFTER Plates to Tugun Ballina Tugun 200km
/ 18 March

DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES

(ii)

REPORT

PLASMOTEKK

TM

UNIVERSAL FUEL OPTIMISER [U.F.O.]

APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL REDUCTION

MAZDA 6GT Vehicle Test 1

Summary Fuel Reduction Results

Final Comparative Fuel Reduction: 44.29%

TEST: Fuel Efficiency And Toxic Emissions Reduction

Vehicle Registration Number: QLD 494 - TRN

VEHICLE TYPE: Mazda 6GT

VEHICLE Specs: 2.2 Litre Engine, 6 Speed Trans, 4 Door Sedan

FUEL TYPE USED: Diesel
TEST DATE CONDUCTED: 15th March 16th March2014
TEST LOCATION: Gold Coast, Brisbane Qld / Northern NSW

Before and After Comparative Component Methods Of Test-1 Used To

m Measure Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates Fitted To The Mazda 6GT Vehicle.
m Comparative Results Tabled under the following 3-Part Headings:

PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-1/ MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-1 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-1 / COMPARATIVE

B
RESULTS FOR MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES

1
BEFORE TEST 1

PART

1: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-1

Note1: THE BEFORE PLASMOTEKK HELENSVALE-BRISBANE-HELENSVALE TEST BEGAN AT:

n

9:30AM 15th March 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

BEFORE PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62 Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Helensvale was 1758
Km. Odometer Reading graphic
shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from

Helensvale to Brisbane to
Helensvale. The outward bound
and return journey travelled was a
total distance of 131.2km. The
odometer reading recorded at
Brisbane was 1824km, a distance of
65.7Km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

2
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 1

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Brisbane back to
Helensvale was 1890km, or a
distance of 65.5km travelled.
Odometer Reading graphic
shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting

point at Helensvale, the tank was
Refilled to it 62 litre capacity. A
Total of 11.56 litres were
Consumed for the Total 131.2km
Total distance travelled,
recorded at the same petrol
bowser shown -

Right: The 11.56 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted
and Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 29C-31C
for the testing period, or an
Average of 30C.
Re b), c) & d)

BEFORE: The following photos

TRIP: 0.0km

RNG: 880km

TRIP: 5.1km

RNG: 876km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5KM, to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE.

3
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 1

TRIP: 11.2km

RNG: 877km

TRIP: 17.2km

TRIP: 25.2km

RNG: 876km

TRIP: 40.9km

RNG: 876km

TRIP: 45.2km

TRIP: 58.9km

RNG: 880km

TRIP: 60.3km

TRIP: 65.7km

RNG: 878km

TRIP: 30.2km

TRIP: 69.9km

RNG: 877km

RNG: 874km

RNG: 876km

RNG: 880km

RNG: 863km

TRIP: 20.6km

RNG: 878km

TRIP: 35.3km

TRIP: 50.2km

TRIP: 65km

RNG: 876km

RNG: 877km

RNG: 885km

TRIP: 75km

RNG: 863km

4
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 1

TRIP: 80.1km

RNG: 860km

TRIP: 84.9km

RNG: 855km

TRIP: 90.6km

TRIP: 95.2km

RNG: 855km

TRIP: 100km

RNG: 848km

TRIP: 105.9km

TRIP: 110.3km

RNG: 877km

TRIP: 114.9km

RNG: 811km

TRIP: 125.1

RNG: 769km

TRIP: 130.1km

RNG: 760km

RNG: 852km

RNG: 845km

TRIP: 119.9km

RNG: 786km

TRIP: 131.2km

RNG: 760km

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

m

PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-1 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

5
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 1

PART

2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-1

Note1: THE AFTER PLASMOTEKK HELENSVALE-BRISBANE-HELENSVALE TEST BEGAN AT:

n

9:30AM 16th MARCH 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

AFTER PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding
Odometer Reading at
Helensvale was 2255Km.
Odometer Reading
graphic shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from

Helensvale to Brisbane to Helensvale.
The outward bound and return journey
travelled was a total distance of
130.8km. The odometer reading
recorded at Brisbane was 2320km, a
distance of 65.1Km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

6
PART 2 AFTER TEST 1

d) Below: The odometer

reading from Brisbane back
to Helensvale was 2386km,
or a distance of 130.8km
travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting point

at Helensvale, the tank was Refilled to
its 62 litre capacity. A Total of 6.42
litres were Consumed for the 130.8km
Total distance travelled, recorded at
the same petrol bowser shown -

Right: The 6.42 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted and
Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 29C-34C for
the testing period, or an
Average of 31C.
Re b), c) & d)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7
PART 2 AFTER TEST 1

AFTER:

The following photos

TRIP: 00.0km

RNG: 948km

TRIP: 5.2km

RNG: 940km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5 KM to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE

TRIP: 10km

RNG: 941km

TRIP: 25.2km

RNG: 935km

TRIP: 41.2km

RNG: 937km

TRIP: 55km

RNG: 937km

TRIP: 15.2km

RNG: 937km

TRIP: 20km

RNG: 935km

TRIP: 29.7km

RNG: 935km

TRIP: 35.9km

RNG: 936km

TRIP: 47.4km

RNG: 936km

TRIP: 50.1km

RNG: 937km

TRIP: 59.5km

RNG: 945km

TRIP: 65.1km

RNG: 953km

8
PART 2 AFTER TEST 1

TRIP: 65.4km

TRIP: 80.4km

RNG: 950km

RNG: 942km

TRIP: 95km

RNG: 954km

TRIP: 110.7km

RNG: 950km

TRIP: 124.9km

RNG: 954km

TRIP: 70.6km

RNG: 941km

TRIP: 85.3km

TRIP: 101.1km

TRIP: 115km

TRIP: 128.5km

RNG: 945km

RNG: 953km

RNG: 952km

RNG: 959km

TRIP: 75km

RNG: 940km

TRIP: 90km

RNG: 951km

TRIP: 105.3km

TRIP: 120km

RNG: 952km

RNG: 953km

TRIP: 130.8km RNG: 954km

9
PART 2 AFTER TEST 1

Below: Graph showing BEFORE & AFTER Fuel Consumption & Trip / Distance against Range.
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE BEFORE PLATES: 116 km OVER 131.2 km
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE AFTER PLATES: 136.8 km OVER 130.8 km
th

th

MAZDA 6GT TEST-1 15 /16 March 2014 / Helensvale Brisbane Helensvale / 130 km

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

m

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-1 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

10
PART 2 AFTER TEST 1

PART
m

3: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE AND AFTER PLASMOTEKK

[U.F.O] COMPARATIVE RESULTS OF TEST-1

A)

SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-1

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 9:30AM

ROUTE: HELENSVALE BRISBANE HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 30C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 131.2 K
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 11.56 L
L/100KM: 11.56 L /131.2 km x 100 = 8.81 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/11.56 L x 131.2km = 703 KM
The BEFORE Plasmotekk [U.F.O] Plate Test
established 11.56 litres per 131.2km, or 8.81 litres
per 100 km, NOT COMPARABLE AND
CONSUMPTION WAS FAR IN EXCESS to any section
defined on the sticker displayed on the windscreen
of the vehicle Right:

B)

SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-1

DATE: 16th MARCH 2014 / TIME 9:37AM

ROUTE: HELENSVALE BRISBANE HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 31C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 130.8 KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 6.42 L
L/100KM: 6.42 L/130.8 km x 100 = 4.9 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/6.42 L x 130.8km = 1263 KM

The AFTER Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plate Test

established 6.42 litres per 130.8km, or 4.9 per
100km comparable to the 4.8 litres per 100km
shown on the sticker displayed on the
windscreen of the vehicle which defined the
test to be in the Extra Urban driving range
THIS OCCURRED ONLY WHEN PLASMOTEKK
PLATES WERE APPLIED Right:
RECOMMENDATION: CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE/S

11
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 1

C) PLASMOTEKK A) & B) RAW DATA ENTRY DERIVED FROM ACTUAL AND REAL ROAD TEST
CONDITIONS FOR COMPARATIVE FINAL RESULT CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN 99.5% -99.9%
ACCURACY. USING DATA COMPILED CALCULATIONS BELOW SHOW AN
ACTUAL, REAL AND MEASURED FUEL REDUCTION OF:

44.29% (Diesel)
Using A) & B) Final Fuel Reduction Calculation Was Made As Follows:
A) SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-1

B) SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-1

th

DATE: 15 MARCH 2014 / TIME: 9:30AM

ROUT: HELENSVALE BRISBANE
HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 29C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 131.2 K
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 116 km Over 131.2 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 11.56 L

DATE: 16th MARCH 2014 / TIME 9:37AM

ROUT: HELENSVALE BRISBANE
HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 31C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 130.8 KM
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 136.8 km Over 130.8 km
CONSUMPTION: 6.42 L

B)
(i)

Calculation 1: Fuel Consumption of the BEFORE Test for exactly 130 Km Is:
11.56 L Divide By 131.2 Km = 0.0.0881 (L/K) Multiply 130 = 11.454 L for 130 Km

(ii)

Calculation 2: Fuel Consumption of the AFTER Test for exactly 200 Km Is:
6.42 L Divide By 130.8 Km = 0.04908 (L/K) Multiply 130 = 6.381 L for 130 Km

(iii)

Calculation 3: Percentage of FUEL USED in AFTER Test Is:

6.381 L Divide By 11.454 L X by 100 = 55.71 % of 11.454 L used in BEFORE Test
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------HENCE: Calculation for Percentage of Fuel Saving or FUEL REDUCTION Is:

(iv)

100% - 55.71% =

44.29% Reduction

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Points Of Note: Data Entry Points Of Interest:

FROM THE GRAPH OVER PAGE FUEL RANGE INSTRUMENT GAUGE PREDICTED:
(i) BEFORE PLATES: Initial Range 876 km Final Range 760km = 116 km for 202.2 km Trip.
(ii) AFTER PLATES: Initial Range 948 km Final Range 954 km = -6 km for 202.2 km Trip.
(iii) Conclusion of (i) &(ii): Because 44.29% Fuel Reduction is the ONLY ACTUAL KNOWN MEASURED
COMPONENT, in this case, the 2 comparison Range Gauge predictions appear to be saying: the

12
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 1

BEFORE Test prediction resulted in 116km to journey 131.2km while using 11.56 Litres of Fuel,
and the AFTER Test prediction resulted in -6 km to journey 130.8 km while using 6.42 Litres of
Fuel, Suggesting OVERUNITY or Perpetual Motion when Plasmotekk was fitted to vehicle.
(iv) Yellow line On Graph shows where Vehicle is stopped at half way mark (65km) for 10 min and
Alters Range Gauge of BOTH Tests with Downward Glitch at same Points which it should not
when measuring Distance of Fuel.
(v) NB: Conclusion of (i), (ii), (iii) & (iv): With or without Plasmotekk Device fitted to any vehicle,
Range Gauge may be working accurately at some times, and working inaccurately other times.
Hence the reason Before and After Tests were conducted to determine Fuel usage over the
same Distance and Average Speed Travelled With On Road Driving Only.

The BEFORE Plasmotekk [U.F.O] Plate Test established 11.56 litres per 131.2km, or 8.81 litres
per 100 km, NOT COMPARABLE AND CONSUMPTION WAS FAR IN EXCESS to any section
defined on the sticker displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle.
NB: The AFTER Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plate Test established 6.42 litres per 203km, or 4.9 per
100km comparable to the 4.8 litres per 100km shown on the sticker displayed on the
windscreen of the vehicle which defined the test to be in the Extra Urban driving range THIS OCCURRED ONLY WHEN PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE APPLIED.
IGNORING ALL OTHER PLASMOTEKK ZERO TOXIC EMISSION REPORTS SUCH AS CALIFORNIA
CLEAN AIR BOARD / ETS REPORTS, IN ALL PROBABILITY, PLASMOTEKK MINIMIZED EMSISSIONS
TO AT LEAST FIGURES DISPLAYED BY ADR81/82 AND MUCH GREATER BY THE DATA INPUT AND
CALCULATIONS ABOVE IN ADDITION TO REDUCING FUEL CONSUMPTION BY 44.29%.
RECOMMENDATION: CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA-6GT VEHICLE/S

Other Points Of Note:

a)

Right: Upon completion of the

AFTER Test (16th March 2014)
approx. 1.5 Litres of Fuel was
lost when refilling the vehicle to
its 62 Litre capacity due to blow
back. This was not factored into
final calculations and remains in
additional favour of Plasmotekk.
A photo of the spill is shown
here -

b) Before Average Temperature was 29C (Min29C Max31C) / After Average Temperature was 31C
(Min29C Max34C). The Plasmotekk After Test was conducted with an Average of 1C increase in
Temperature than the Before Test. Because Fuel efficiency decreases as temperature increases and the
calculation of 1C increase in temperature was not entered into the final calculation, in this case, further
enhances final result of 44.29% fuel reduction of the After Test conducted by PLASMOTEKK.
m

13
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 1

c) Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates Series used for PART 2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-1 are
th
shown below, left: UFO4WD-1 Series was chosen for the 16 March 2014 130km After test run from
Helensvale, Brisbane Helensvale which achieved a Fuel Reduction of 44.29%.
m

d)) Right: This is

typical carbon
build up on a
MAZDA 6GT. The
near new vehicle
was picked up
from Oldmac
dealership to
begin
Plasmotekk road
th
test on 15
March 2014.

15th March 2014

e)) Right: Although not

clear, this is the same 6GT
exhaust pipe after first
Plasmotekk test from
Helensvale to Brisbane
th
return on 16 March. An
insert of photo taken on
th
18 March shows no carbon
whatsoever, typical of Zero
Toxic Emissions emitted
from Plasmotekk Plates
fitted vehicles resulting
from Dramatic Fuel Air Burn
Rate.

16th March 2014

18th March 2014

Note: EACH YEAR PER 20,000 KM 1 KILOGRAM OF PLASMOTEKK CAN PREVENT:

- 4 Tons of Poisonous Carbon Monoxide (CO) from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even more Poisonous NoX from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even greater Poisonous SoX from going into the Atmosphere.
NB: Only Co2 can be absorbed by Forests. NoX and SoX have been exponentially building up in
the
the Atmosphere since the development of the Internal Combustion Engine almost a 100 years ago.

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-1 /
COMPARATIVE RESULTS MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

14
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 1

REPORT

PLASMOTEKK

TM

UNIVERSAL FUEL OPTIMISER [U.F.O.]

APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL REDUCTION

MAZDA 6GT Vehicle Test 2

Summary Fuel Reduction Results

Final Comparative Fuel Reduction: 58.04%

TEST: Fuel Efficiency And Toxic Emissions Reduction

Vehicle Registration Number: QLD 494 - TRN

VEHICLE TYPE: Mazda 6GT

VEHICLE Specs: 2.2 Litre Engine, 6 Speed Trans, 4 Door Sedan

FUEL TYPE USED: Diesel
TEST DATE CONDUCTED: 15th March 17th March2014
TEST LOCATION: Gold Coast, Brisbane Qld / Northern NSW

Before and After Comparative Component Methods Of Test-2 Used To

m Measure Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates Fitted To The Mazda 6GT Vehicle.
m Comparative Results Tabled under the following 3-Part Headings:

PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-2 / COMPARATIVE

B
RESULTS FOR MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES

15
TEST 2

PART

1: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-2

Note1: THE BEFORE PLASMOTEKK HELENSVALE-BRISBANE-HELENSVALE TEST BEGAN AT:

AT:

. 9:30AM 15th March 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

BEFORE PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62 Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Helensvale was 1758
Km. Odometer Reading graphic
shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from

Helensvale to Brisbane to
Helensvale. The outward bound
and return journey travelled was a
total distance of 131.2km. The
odometer reading recorded at
Brisbane was 1824km, a distance
of 65.7Km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

16
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 2

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Brisbane back to Helensvale
was 1890km, or a distance of
65.5km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting point at

Helensvale, the tank was Refilled to its
62 litre capacity. A Total of 11.56 litres
were Consumed for the 131.2km Total
distance travelled, recorded at the same
petrol bowser shown -

Right: The 11.56 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted
and Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 29C-31C
for the testing period, or an
Average of 30C.
Re b), c) & d)

BEFORE: The following photos

TRIP: 0.0km

RNG: 880km

TRIP: 5.1km

RNG: 876km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5KM, to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE.

17
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 2

TRIP: 11.2km

RNG: 877km

TRIP: 17.2km

RNG: 877km

TRIP: 20.6km

TRIP: 25.2km

RNG: 876km

TRIP: 30.2km

RNG: 874km

TRIP: 35.3km

TRIP: 40.9km

RNG: 876km

TRIP: 45.2km

TRIP: 58.9km

RNG: 880km

TRIP: 60.3km

TRIP: 65.7km

RNG: 878km

TRIP: 69.9km

RNG: 876km

RNG: 880km

RNG: 863km

TRIP: 50.2km

TRIP: 65km

RNG: 878km

RNG: 876km

RNG: 877km

RNG: 885km

TRIP: 75km

RNG: 863km

18
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 2

TRIP: 80.1km

RNG: 860km

TRIP: 84.9km

RNG: 855km

TRIP: 90.6km

TRIP: 95.2km

RNG: 855km

TRIP: 100km

RNG: 848km

TRIP: 105.9km

TRIP: 110.3km

RNG: 877km

TRIP: 114.9km

RNG: 811km

TRIP: 125.1

RNG: 769km

TRIP: 130.1km

RNG: 760km

RNG: 852km

RNG: 845km

TRIP: 119.9km

RNG: 786km

TRIP: 131.2km

RNG: 760km

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

m

PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O] TEST-2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

19
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 2

PART

2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-2

Note1: THE AFTER PLASMOTEKK HELENSVALE-BRISBANE-HELENSVALE TEST BEGAN AT:

n

9:50AM 17th MARCH 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

AFTER PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Helensvale was
2682Km. Odometer Reading
graphic shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from

Helensvale to Brisbane to Helensvale.
The outward bound and return journey
travelled was a total distance of
130.9km. The odometer reading
recorded at Brisbane was 2747km, a
distance of 65Km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

20
PART 2 AFTER TEST 2

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Brisbane back to
Helensvale was 2813km, or a
distance of 130.9km travelled.
Odometer Reading graphic
shown -

e) Below: Upon return to starting point

at Helensvale, the tank was Refilled to
its 62 litre capacity. A Total of 4.84
litres were Consumed for the 130.9km
Total distance travelled, recorded at
the same petrol bowser shown -

h) Right: The 4.84 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted and
Dated shown -

i)

NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 29C-33C for
the testing period, or an
Average of 31C.
Re b), c) & d)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

21
PART 2 AFTER TEST 2

AFTER:

The following photos

TRIP: 00.0km RNG: 1081km

TRIP: 5.1km

RNG: 1066km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5 KM to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE

TRIP: 10.4km

RNG: 1067km

TRIP: 15.1km

RNG: 1065km

TRIP: 25km

RNG: 1064km

TRIP: 29.9km

RNG: 10.67km

TRIP: 40km

RNG: 1070km

TRIP: 45.3km

RNG: 1066km

TRIP: 55.2km

RNG: 1068km

TRIP: 60.1km

RNG: 10.74km

TRIP: 20km

TRIP: 34.4km

TRIP: 50.3km

TRIP: 65km

RNG: 1063km

RNG: 1070km

RNG: 1069km

RNG: 1079km

22
PART 2 AFTER TEST 2

TRIP: 70.9km

RNG: 1056km

TRIP: 74.9km

TRIP: 85.3km

RNG: 1056km

TRIP: 90km

TRIP: 100km

RNG: 1051km

TRIP: 115.1km

RNG: 979km

TRIP: 130.9km

RNG: 920km

TRIP: 105km

RNG: 1054km

RNG: 1060km

RNG: 1042km

TRIP: 120.1km

RNG: 952km

TRIP: 80km

TRIP: 95km

TRIP: 110km

TRIP: 125.1km

RNG: 1052km

RNG: 1056km

RNG: 1010km

RNG: 924km

23
PART 2 AFTER TEST 2

Below: Graph showing BEFORE & AFTER Fuel Consumption & Trip / Distance against Range.
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE BEFORE PLATES: 116 km OVER 131.2 km
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE AFTER PLATES: 161 km OVER 130.9 km
th

th

MAZDA 6GT TEST-2 15 /17 March 2014 / Helensvale Brisbane Helensvale / 130km

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

m

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-2 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

24
PART 2 AFTER TEST 2

PART
m

3: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK

[U.F.O.] COMPARATIVE RESULTS FOR TEST-2

A)

SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-2

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 9:30AM

ROUT: HELENSVALE BRISBANE HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 30C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 131.2 K
RANGE PREDICTION: 116 km FOR 131.2 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 11.56 L
L/100KM: 11.56 L /131.2 km x 100 = 8.81 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/11.56 L x 131.2km = 703 KM

NB: The BEFORE Plasmotekk [U.F.O] Plate Test

established 11.56 litres per 131.2km, or 8.81 litres per
100 km, NOT COMPARABLE AND CONSUMPTION WAS
FAR IN EXCESS to any section defined on the sticker
displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle Right:

B)

SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-2

DATE: 17th MARCH 2014 / TIME 9:37AM

ROUT: HELENSVALE BRISBANE HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 31C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 130.9 KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 4.84 L
L/100KM: 4.84 L /130.9 km x 100 = 3.69 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/4.84 L x 130.9km = 1676 KM
NB: The AFTER Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test
established 4.84 litres per 130.9km, or 3.7 per
100km WELL BELOW THE LOWEST
CONSUMPTION shown on the sticker displayed
on the windscreen of the vehicle which occurred
ONLY WHEN PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE
APPLIED Right:
RECOMMENDATION: CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE/S

25
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 2

C) PLASMOTEKK A) & B) RAW DATA ENTRY DERIVED FROM ACTUAL AND REAL ROAD TEST CONDITIONS
FOR COMPARATIVE FINAL RESULT CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN 99.5% -99.9% ACCURACY. USING DATA
COMPILED CALCULATIONS BELOW SHOW AN ACTUAL, REAL AND MEASURED FUEL REDUCTION OF:

58.04% (Diesel)
Using A) & B) Final Fuel Reduction Calculation Was Made As Follows:
A) SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-2

B) SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-2

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 9:30AM

ROUT: HELENSVALE BRISBANE
HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 29C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 131.2 K
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 116 km Over 131.2 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 11.56 L

DATE: 17th MARCH 2014 / TIME 9:37AM

ROUT: HELENSVALE BRISBANE
HELENSVALE
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 31C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 130.9 KM
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 136.8 km Over 130.8 km
CONSUMPTION: 4.84 L

C)
(i)

Calculation 1: Fuel Consumption of the BEFORE Test for exactly 130 Km Is:
11.56 L Divide By 131.2 Km = 0.881 (L/K) Multiply 130 = 11.454 L for 130 Km

(ii)

Calculation 2: Fuel Consumption of the AFTER Test for exactly 130 Km Is:
4.84 L Divide By 130.9 Km = 0.03697 (L/K) Multiply 130 = 4.806 L for 130Km

(iii)

Calculation 3: Percentage of FUEL USED in AFTER Test Is:

4.806 L Divide By 11.454 L X by 100 = 41.96% of 11.454 L used in BEFORE Test
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------HENCE: Calculation for Percentage of Fuel Saving or FUEL REDUCTION Is:

(iv)

100% - 41.96% =

58.04% Reduction

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Points Of Note: Data Entry Points Of Interest:

FROM THE GRAPH OVER PAGE FUEL RANGE INSTRUMENT GAUGE PREDICTED:
(i)
BEFORE PLATES: Initial Range 876km Final Range 760km = 116 km for 131.2 km Trip.
(ii)
AFTER PLATES: Initial Range 1018km Final Range 920 km = 98 km for 130.9 km Trip.
(iii)
Conclusion of (i) & (ii): Because 58.04% Fuel Reduction is the ONLY ACTUAL KNOWN
MEASURED COMPONENT, in this case, the 2 comparison Range Gauge predictions appear
to be saying: the BEFORE Test prediction resulted in 116km to journey 131.2 while using

26
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 2

(iv)

(v)

11.56 Litres, and the AFTER Test prediction resulted in 98km to journey 130.9km while
using 4.84 Litres of Fuel.
Yellow line on Graph shows where Vehicle is stopped at half way mark (65km) for 10 min
and Alters Range Gauge of BOTH Tests with Downward Glitch at same Points which it
should not when measuring Distance of Fuel
NB: Conclusion of (i), (ii), (iii) & (iv): With or without Plasmotekk Device fitted to any
vehicle, Range Gauge may be working accurately at some times, and working inaccurately
other times. Hence the reason Before and After Tests were conducted to determine Fuel
usage over the same Distance and Average Speed Travelled - With On Road Driving Only.

The BEFORE Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test established 11.56 litres per 131.2km, or 8.81 Litres per 100
km, NOT COMPARABLE AND CONSUMPTION WAS FAR IN EXCESS to any section defined on the
sticker displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle.
The AFTER Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test established 4.84 litres per 130.9km, or 3.7 Litres per 100km
WELL BELOW the lowest consumption scale shown on the sticker displayed on the windscreen of
the vehicle which occurred ONLY WHEN PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE APPLIED.
IGNORING ALL OTHER PLASMOTEKK ZERO TOXIC EMISSION REPORTS SUCH AS CALIFORNIA CLEAN
AIR BOARD / ETS REPORTS, IN ALL PROBABILITY, PLASMOTEKK MINIMIZED EMSISSIONS TO AT
LEAST FIGURES DISPLAYED BY ADR81/02 AND MUCH GREATER BY THE DATA INPUT AND
CALCULATIONS ABOVE IN ADDITION TO REDUCING FUEL CONSUMPTION BY 58.04%.
RECOMMENDATION: CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA-6GT VEHICLE/S

Other Points Of Note:

a)

Before Average Temperature was 29C / After Average Temperature was 31C. The Plasmotekk
After Test was conducted with an Average of 2C increase in Temperature than the Before Test.
Because Fuel efficiency decreases as temperature increases and the calculation of 2C increase
in temperature was not entered into the final calculation, in this case, further enhances final
result of 58.04% fuel reduction of the After Test conducted by PLASMOTEKK.

b)

Plasmotekk Plates Series used for PART 2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-2 are shown
th
below, left: UFO4MV-2 Series was chosen for the 17 March 2014 130km After test run from
Helensvale, Brisbane Helensvale which achieved Fuel Reduction of 58.04%.
m
m

c)

27
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 2

d)) Right: This is

typical carbon
build up on a
MAZDA 6GT. The
near new vehicle
was picked up
from Oldmac
dealership to
begin
Plasmotekk road
th
test on 15
March 2014.

15th March 2014

e)) Right: This is the exhaust

pipe after Second Plasmotekk
test from Helensvale to
th
Brisbane return on 17
March. An insert of photo
taken of fingers wiping inside
pipe shows no carbon
whatsoever and is typical of
Zero Toxic Emissions emitted
from Plasmotekk fitted
vehicles resulting from
Dramatic Fuel Air Burn Rate.

17th March 2014

Note: EACH YEAR PER 20,000 KM 1 KILOGRAM OF PLASMOTEKK CAN PREVENT:

- 4 Tons of Poisonous Carbon Monoxide (CO) from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even more Poisonous NoX from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even greater Poisonous SoX from going into the Atmosphere.
NB: Only Co2 can be absorbed by Forests. NoX and SoX have been exponentially building up in the
m
the Atmosphere since the development of the Internal Combustion Engine almost a 100 years ago.

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-2 /
COMPARATIVE RESULTS MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

28
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 2

REPORT

PLASMOTEKK

TM

UNIVERSAL FUEL OPTIMISER [U.F.O.]

APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL REDUCTION

MAZDA 6GT Vehicle Test 3

Summary Fuel Reduction Results

Final Comparative Fuel Reduction: 36.29%

TEST: Fuel Efficiency And Toxic Emissions Reduction

Vehicle Registration Number: QLD 494 - TRN

VEHICLE TYPE: Mazda 6GT

VEHICLE Specs: 2.2 Litre Engine, 6 Speed Trans, 4 Door Sedan

FUEL TYPE USED: Diesel
TEST DATE CONDUCTED: 15th March 16th March 2014
TEST LOCATION: Gold Coast, Brisbane Qld / Northern NSW

Before and After Comparative Component Methods Of Test-3 Used To

m Measure Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates Fitted To The Mazda 6GT Vehicle.
m Comparative Results Tabled under the following 3-Part Headings:

PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-3 / COMPARATIVE

B
RESULTS FOR MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES

29
TEST 3

PART

1: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-3

Note1: THE BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TUGUN BYRON-BALLINA-TUGUN TEST BEGAN AT:

n

4:10PM 15th March 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

BEFORE PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62 Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Tugun was 1964 Km.
Odometer Reading graphic shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from Tugun

to Ballina to Tugun. The outward bound
and return journey travelled was a total
distance of 202.1km. The odometer
reading recorded at Ballina was 2065km, a
distance of 100km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

30
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 3

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Ballina back to Tugun was
2167km, or a distance of 102.1km
travelled. Odometer Reading
graphic shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting point at

Tugun, the tank was Refilled to its 62
litre capacity. A Total of 15.64 litres were
Consumed for the 202.1km Total
distance travelled, recorded at the same
petrol bowser shown -

Right: The 15.64 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted
and Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 27C-29C
for the testing period, or an
Average of 28C.
Re b), c) & d)

31
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 3

BEFORE: The following photos

TRIP: 0.0km

RNG: 1015km

TRIP: 5.0km

RNG: 1014km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5KM, to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE.

TRIP: 10km

RNG: 1008km

TRIP: 15km

TRIP: 25km

RNG: 1011km

TRIP: 30.1km

TRIP: 40km

RNG: 1005km

TRIP: 45.1km

RNG: 1011km

RNG: 1009km

RNG: 1005km

TRIP: 20.1km

RNG: 1013km

TRIP: 35km

RNG: 1008km

TRIP: 50.1km

RNG: 1001km

\
TRIP: 55km

RNG: 1000km

TRIP: 60km

RNG: 998km

TRIP: 65km

RNG: 1001km

32
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 3

TRIP: 70km

RNG: 1000km

TRIP: 75.1km

RNG: 994km

TRIP: 80.1km

RNG: 1002km

TRIP: 85km

RNG: 1002km

TRIP: 90.4km

RNG: 994km

TRIP: 95.1km

RNG: 995km

TRIP: 100km

RNG: 989km

TRIP: 105.5km

RNG: 972km

TRIP: 110km

RNG: 956km

TRIP: 115.7km

TRIP: 130km

RNG: 954km

RNG: 952km

TRIP: 122km

TRIP: 135.2km

RNG: 948km

RNG: 945km

TRIP: 125.6km

RNG: 949km

TRIP: 140km

RNG: 937km

33
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 3

TRIP: 145km

TRIP: 160km

TRIP: 175km

RNG: 933km

RNG: 922km

RNG: 917km

TRIP: 190.1km

RNG: 909km

TRIP: 202.1km

RNG: 871km

TRIP: 150.3km

RNG: 931km

TRIP: 155.1km

RNG: 927km

TRIP: 165km

RNG: 915km

TRIP: 170km

RNG: 917km

TRIP: 180km

RNG: 915km

TRIP: 185.1km

RNG: 914km

TRIP: 200km

RNG: 893km

TRIP: 194.9km

RNG: 910km

END OF DOCUMENTATION
m

FOR PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

34
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 3

PART

2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-3

Note1: THE AFTER PLASMOTEKK TUGUN-BALLINA-TUGUN TEST BEGAN AT:

n

4:10PM 16th MARCH 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

AFTER PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Tugun was 2427Km.
Odometer Reading graphic shown
-

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from

Tugun to Ballina to Tugun. The outward
bound and return journey travelled was
a total distance of 200.2. The odometer
reading recorded at Ballina was
2527km, a distance of 100.4km
travelled. Odometer Reading graphic
shown -

35
PART 2 AFTER TEST 3

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Ballina back to Tugun was
2627km, or a distance of
99.8km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting point

at Tugun, the tank was Refilled to it
62 litre capacity. A Total of 9.97 litres
were Consumed for the 202.2km Total
distance travelled, recorded at the
same petrol bowser shown -

Right: The 9.97 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted and
Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 22C-30C for
the testing period, or an
Average of 26C.
Re b), c) & d)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

36
PART 2 AFTER TEST 3

AFTER:

The following photos

TRIP: 00km

RNG: 857km

TRIP: 5.1km

RNG: 846km

TRIP: 15km

RNG: 841km

TRIP: 20.1km

RNG: 837km

RNG: 833km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5 KM to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE

TRIP: 10.1km

RNG: 841km

TRIP: 25km

RNG: 835km

TRIP: 30km

TRIP: 40.5km

RNG: 828km

TRIP: 45.1km

TRIP: 56.6km

RNG: 785km

TRIP: 60km

RNG: 828km

RNG: 770km

TRIP: 35.3km

RNG: 830km

TRIP: 50.7km

RNG: 875km

TRIP: 65.2km

RNG: 756km

37
PART 2 AFTER TEST 3

TRIP: 70km

RNG: 753km

TRIP: 75.5km

TRIP: 84.9km

RNG: 743km

TRIP: 90km

TRIP: 100.4km

RNG: 731km

TRIP: 105.2km

TRIP: 114.8km

RNG: 710km

TRIP: 120.9km

TRIP: 130km

RNG: 705km

TRIP: 135km

RNG: 746km

RNG: 740km

TRIP: 80km

RNG: 747km

TRIP: 95.1km

RNG: 737km

RNG: 720km

TRIP: 110.6km

RNG: 712km

RNG: 707km

TRIP: 125.1km

RNG: 704km

TRIP: 140.4km

RNG: 702km

RNG: 703km

38
PART 2 AFTER TEST 3

TRIP: 145.1km

RNG: 702km

TRIP: 150km

TRIP: 160.8km

RNG: 709km

TRIP: 167.2km

TRIP: 175.1km

RNG: 703km

TRIP: 190.3km

RNG: 705km

RNG: 705km

TRIP: 155.1km

RNG: 709km

RNG: 708km

TRIP: 170km

RNG: 706km

TRIP: 181.3km

RNG: 703km

TRIP: 184.6km

RNG: 704km

TRIP: 194.2km

RNG: 705km

TRIP: 202.2km

RNG: 697km

39
PART 2 AFTER TEST 3

Below: Graph showing BEFORE & AFTER Fuel Consumption & Trip / Distance against Range.
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE BEFORE PLATES: 144 km OVER 202.1 km
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE AFTER PLATES: 160 km OVER 202.2 km
th

th

MAZDA 6GT TEST-3 15 /16 March 2014 / Tugun Ballina Tugun / 200km

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

m

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-3 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

40
PART 2 AFTER TEST 3

PART
m

3: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK

[U.F.O] COMPARATIVE RESULTS FOR TEST-3

A)

SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-3

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 4:10PM
ROUT: TUGUN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 28C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 202.1 K
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 15.64 L
L/100KM: 15.64 L /202.1 km x 100 = 7.738 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/15.64 L x 202.1km = 801 KM

NB: The BEFORE Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plate

Test established 15.64 litres per 202.1km, or
7.38 litres per 100 km, NOT COMPARABLE
AND CONSUMPTION WAS FAR IN EXCESS to
any section defined on the sticker displayed on
the windscreen of the vehicle Right:

B)

SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-3

DATE: 16th MARCH 2014 / TIME 4:00PM
ROUT: TUGN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 26C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 202.2 KM
CONSUMPTION: 9.97 L
L/100KM: 9.97 L /202.2 km x 100 = 4.93 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/9.97 L x 202.2km = 1257 KM

NB: The AFTER Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plate Test

established 9.97 litres per 202.2km, or 4.9 per 100km
comparable to the 4.8 litres per 100km shown on the
sticker displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle
which defined the test to be in the Extra Urban
driving range THIS OCCURRED ONLY WHEN
PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE APPLIED Right:
RECOMMENDATION: CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE/S

41
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 3

C) PLASMOTEKK A) & B) RAW DATA ENTRY DERIVED FROM ACTUAL AND REAL ROAD TEST
CONDITIONS FOR COMPARATIVE FINAL RESULT CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN 99.5% -99.9%
RANGE OF ACCURACY. USING DATA COMPILED CALCULATIONS BELOW SHOW AN
ACTUAL, REAL AND MEASURED FUEL REDUCTION OF:

36.29% (Diesel)
Using A) & B) Final Fuel Reduction Calculation Was Made As Follows:
A)

SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-3

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 4:10PM
ROUT: TUGUN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 28C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 202.1 K
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 144 km FOR 202.1 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 15.64 L

B)

SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-3

DATE: 16th MARCH 2014 / TIME 4:00PM
ROUT: TUGUN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 26C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 202.2 KM
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 160 km FOR 202.2 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 9.97 L

(i)

Calculation 1: Fuel Consumption of the BEFORE Test for exactly 200 Km Is:
15.64 L Divide By 202.1 Km = 0.0.07734 (L/K) Multiply 200 = 15.477 L for 200 Km

(ii)

Calculation 2: Fuel Consumption of the AFTER Test for exactly 200 Km Is:
9.97 L Divide By 202.2 Km = 0.0493 (L/K) Multiply 200 = 9.86 L for 200Km

(iii)

Calculation 3: Percentage of FUEL USED in AFTER Test Is:

9.86 L Divide By 15.477 L X by 100 = 63.707% of 15.477 L used in BEFORE Test
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------HENCE: Calculation for Percentage of Fuel Saving or FUEL REDUCTION Is:

(iv)

100% - 63.707% =

36.29% Reduction

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Points Of Note: Data Entry Points Of Interest:

FROM THE GRAPH OVER PAGE FUEL RANGE INSTRUMENT GAUGE PREDICTED:
(i)
BEFORE PLATES: Initial Range 1015km Final Range 871km = 144 km for 202.2 km Trip.
(ii)
AFTER PLATES: Initial Range 857km Final Range 697 km = 160 km for 202.2 km Trip.
(iii)
Conclusion of (i) & (ii): Because 36.29% Fuel Reduction is the ONLY ACTUAL KNOWN
MEASURED COMPONENT, in this case, the 2 comparison Range Gauge predictions appear
to be saying: the BEFORE Test prediction resulted in 144km to journey 202.1km while using

42
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 3

(iv)

(v)

15.64 Litres of Fuel, and the AFTER Test prediction resulted in 160km to journey 202.1km
while using 9.97 Litres of Fuel.
Yellow line on Graph shows where Vehicle is stopped at half way mark (65km) for 10 min
and Alters Range Gauge of BOTH Tests with Downward Glitch at same Points which it
should not when measuring Distance of Fuel.
NB: Conclusion of (i), (ii), (iii) & (iv): With or without Plasmotekk Device fitted to any
vehicle, Range Gauge may be working accurately at some times, and working inaccurately
other times. Hence the reason Before and After Tests were conducted to determine Fuel
usage over the same Distance and Average Speed Travelled With On Road Driving Only.

The BEFORE Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test established 15.64 litres per 202.1km, or 7.74 litres per 100
km, NOT COMPARABLE AND CONSUMPTION WAS FAR IN EXCESS to any section defined on the
sticker displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle.
The AFTER Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test established 9.97 litres per 202.2km, or 4.9 per 100km
comparable to the 4.8 litres per 100km displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle which defined
the test to be in the Extra Urban driving range - THIS OCCURRED ONLY WHEN PLASMOTEKK
PLATES WERE APPLIED.
IGNORING ALL OTHER PLASMOTEKK ZERO TOXIC EMISSION REPORTS SUCH AS CALIFORNIA CLEAN
AIR BOARD / ETS REPORTS, IN ALL PROBABILITY, PLASMOTEKK MINIMIZED EMSISSIONS TO AT
LEAST FIGURES DISPLAYED BY ADR81/02 AND MUCH GREATER BY THE DATA INPUT AND
CALCULATIONS ABOVE IN ADDITION TO REDUCING FUEL CONSUMPTION BY 36.29%.
RECOMMENDATION CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA-6GT VEHICLE/S

Other Points Of Note:

a)

rd

th

Approx 1/3 of the AFTER Test (16 March 2014) was accompanied by 50km/hr head on gale force
winds which broke trees en Route. This was not factored into final calculations but Significantly in
Plasmotekks favour. See weather manifest on route below:

b) Before Average Temperature was 28C / After Average Temperature was 26C. The Plasmotekk After
Test was conducted with an Average of 2C less Temperature than the Before Test. Because Fuel
efficiency decreases as temperature increases and the calculation of 2C less temperature was not
entered into the final calculation, in this case, final result of 36.28% continues to favour the After
Test conducted by PLASMOTEKK.

43
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 3

c)

Plasmotekk Plates Series used for PART 2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-3 are shown
th
below, left: UFO4WD-1 Series was chosen for the 16 March 2014 130km After test run from
Helensvale, Brisbane Helensvale which achieved Fuel Reduction of 36.29%.
m

d)) Right: This is

typical carbon
build up on a
MAZDA 6GT. The
near new vehicle
was picked up
from Oldmac
dealership to
begin
Plasmotekk road
th
test on 15
March 2014.

15th March 2014

MAZDA 6GT

e)) Right: Plasmotekk test

from Helensvale to Brisbane
return in MAZDA CX-5 on
th
6 March and insert MAZDA
th
6GT after test 17 March
showing inside pipes of both
vehicles with no carbon
whatsoever, typical of Zero
Toxic Emissions emitted
from Plasmotekk fitted
vehicles resulting from
Dramatic Fuel Air Burn Rate.

6th March 2014

MAZDA CX-5

17th Mar 2014

MAZDA 6GT

Note: EACH YEAR PER 20,000 KM 1 KILOGRAM OF PLASMOTEKK CAN PREVENT:

- 4 Tons of Poisonous Carbon Monoxide (CO) from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even more Poisonous NoX from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even greater Poisonous SoX from going into the Atmosphere.
NB: Only Co2 can be absorbed by Forests. NoX and SoX have been exponentially building up in
the
the Atmosphere since the development of the Internal Combustion Engine almost a 100 years ago.

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-3 /
COMPARATIVE RESULTS MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

44
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 3

REPORT

PLASMOTEKK

TM

UNIVERSAL FUEL OPTIMISER [U.F.O.]

APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL REDUCTION

MAZDA 6GT Vehicle Test 4

Summary Fuel Reduction Results

Final Comparative Fuel Reduction: 37.89%

TEST: Fuel Efficiency And Toxic Emissions Reduction

Vehicle Registration Number: QLD 494 - TRN

VEHICLE TYPE: Mazda 6GT

VEHICLE Specs: 2.2 Litre Engine, 6 Speed Trans, 4 Door Sedan

FUEL TYPE USED: Diesel
TEST DATE CONDUCTED: 15th March 18th March 2014
TEST LOCATION: Gold Coast, Brisbane Qld / Northern NSW

Before and After Comparative Component Methods Of Test-4 Used To

m Measure Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates Fitted To The Mazda 6GT Vehicle.
m Comparative Results Tabled under the following 3-Part Headings:

PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-4 / COMPARATIVE

B
RESULTS FOR MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES

45
TEST 4

PART

1: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-4

Note1: THE BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TUGUN BYRON-BALLINA-TUGUN TEST BEGAN AT:

n

4:10PM 15th March 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

BEFORE PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62 Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Tugun was 1964 Km.
Odometer Reading graphic shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from Tugun

to Ballina to Tugun. The outward bound
and return journey travelled was a total
distance of 202.1km. The odometer
reading recorded at Ballina was 2065km, a
distance of 100km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

46
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 4

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Ballina back to Tugun was
2167km, or a distance of 102.1km
travelled. Odometer Reading
graphic shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting point at

Tugun, the tank was Refilled to its 62
litre capacity. A Total of 15.64 litres were
Consumed for the 202.1km Total
distance travelled, recorded at the same
petrol bowser shown -

Right: The 15.64 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted
and Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 25C-29C
for the testing period, or an
Average of 27C.
Re b), c) & d) and Trip
Frames below

47
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 4

BEFORE: The following photos

TRIP: 0.0km

RNG: 1015km

TRIP: 5.0km

RNG: 1014km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5KM, to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE.

TRIP: 10km

RNG: 1008km

TRIP: 15km

TRIP: 25km

RNG: 1011km

TRIP: 30.1km

TRIP: 40km

RNG: 1005km

TRIP: 45.1km

RNG: 1011km

RNG: 1009km

RNG: 1005km

TRIP: 20.1km

RNG: 1013km

TRIP: 35km

RNG: 1008km

TRIP: 50.1km

RNG: 1001km

\
TRIP: 55km

RNG: 1000km

TRIP: 60km

RNG: 998km

TRIP: 65km

RNG: 1001km

48
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 4

TRIP: 70km

RNG: 1000km

TRIP: 75.1km

RNG: 994km

TRIP: 80.1km

RNG: 1002km

TRIP: 85km

RNG: 1002km

TRIP: 90.4km

RNG: 994km

TRIP: 95.1km

RNG: 995km

TRIP: 100km

RNG: 989km

TRIP: 105.5km

RNG: 972km

TRIP: 110km

RNG: 956km

TRIP: 115.7km

TRIP: 130km

RNG: 954km

RNG: 952km

TRIP: 122km

TRIP: 135.2km

RNG: 948km

RNG: 945km

TRIP: 125.6km

RNG: 949km

TRIP: 140km

RNG: 937km

49
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 4

TRIP: 145km

TRIP: 160km

TRIP: 175km

RNG: 933km

RNG: 922km

RNG: 917km

TRIP: 190.1km

RNG: 909km

TRIP: 202.1km

RNG: 871km

TRIP: 150.3km

RNG: 931km

TRIP: 155.1km

RNG: 927km

TRIP: 165km

RNG: 915km

TRIP: 170km

RNG: 917km

TRIP: 180km

RNG: 915km

TRIP: 185.1km

RNG: 914km

TRIP: 200km

RNG: 893km

TRIP: 194.9km

RNG: 910km

END OF DOCUMENTATION
m

FOR PART 1: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

50
PART 1 BEFORE TEST 4

PART

2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-4

Note1: THE AFTER PLASMOTEKK TUGUN- BALLINA-TUGUN TEST BEGAN AT:

n

3:15PM 18th MARCH 2014 SHOWN IN a) BELOW:

Note2: FOLLOWING IS THE METHOD BY WHICH FUEL CONSUMPTION RESULTS WERE OBTAINED
n

AFTER PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE FITTED TO THE MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE:

a) Below: The vehicles tank was
filled to its 62Litre capacity with
Diesel. Fuel Receipt and Date
graphic shown -

b) Below: Corresponding Odometer

Reading at Tugun was 3064Km.
Odometer Reading graphic shown -

c) Right: The vehicle was driven from

Tugun to Ballina to Tugun. The outward
bound and return journey travelled was
a total distance of 201.4km. The
odometer reading recorded at Ballina
was 3164km, a distance of 100km
travelled. Odometer Reading graphic
shown -

51
PART 2 AFTER TEST 4

d) Below: The odometer reading

from Ballina back to Tugun was
2627km, or a distance of
101.4km travelled. Odometer
Reading graphic shown -

f)

e) Below: Upon return to starting point

at Tugun, the tank was Refilled to it
62 litre capacity. A Total of 9.68 litres
were Consumed for the 201.4km Total
distance travelled, recorded at the
same petrol bowser shown -

Right: The 9.68 Litre Fuel

Amount Used is Receipted and
Dated shown -

g) NB: Outside environmental

temperature was 27C-30C for
the testing period, or an
Average of 28.5C.
Re b), c) & d) and Trip Frames
below

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

52
PART 2 AFTER TEST 4

AFTER:

The following photos

TRIP: 00km

RNG: 1040km

TRIP: 5.3km

RNG: 1030km

and corresponding figures were

obtained Every 5 KM to plot
Distance Travelled represented by
Trip against the Range of the
odometer. The gradient of the
graph of the Before test, is then
compared to the gradient of the
After Test for ADDITIONAL FACTOR
OF EVIDENCE

TRIP: 10.7km

TRIP: 25.8km

TRIP: 40km

TRIP: 55.3km

RNG: 1024km

RNG: 990km

RNG: 948km

RNG: 953km

TRIP: 15.4km

TRIP: 30.4km

RNG:1032km

TRIP: 20.1km

RNG: 1018km

RNG:968km

TRIP: 35.3km

RNG: 945km

TRIP: 44.6km

RNG:951km

TRIP: 49.9km

TRIP: 60km

RNG:955km

TRIP: 65km

RNG: 952km

RNG: 961km

53
PART 2 AFTER TEST 4

TRIP: 70km

RNG: 958km

TRIP: 75.3km

RNG:957km

TRIP: 85km

RNG: 967km

TRIP: 90km

RNG:968km

TRIP: 100km

RNG: 902km

TRIP: 105.4km

RNG:955km

TRIP: 80.2km

RNG: 963km

TRIP: 95.1km

TRIP: 10.4km

RNG: 964km

RNG: 951km

TRIP: 114.9km

RNG: 953km

TRIP: 120.3km

RNG:956km

TRIP: 125.2km

RNG: 957km

TRIP: 129.9km

RNG: 963km

TRIP: 129.9km

RNG:963km

TRIP: 135km

RNG: 960km

54
PART 2 AFTER TEST 4

TRIP: 140.1km

RNG: 959km

TRIP: 145km

RNG:954km

TRIP: 155.2km

RNG: 951km

TRIP: 170km

RNG: 943km

TRIP: 175.2km

RNG: 941km

TRIP: 180.6km

TRIP: 185km

RNG: 938km

TRIP: 190.1km

RNG:935km

TRIP: 195km

TRIP: `160.5km RNG: 948km

TRIP: 150.4km RNG: 947km

TRIP: 165.5km

RNG: 939km

RNG: 941km

RNG: 936km

Trip Frame at 185km was

missed by Camera. A Mid Point
between previous frame (Trip
180.6 Rng 941) and next frame
(Trip 190.1 Rng 935) was
entered on Graph:
Trip: 185km Rng: 938km

TRIP: 201.4km RNG: 926km

55
PART 2 AFTER TEST 4

Below: Graph showing BEFORE & AFTER Fuel Consumption & Trip / Distance against Range.
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE BEFORE PLATES: 144 km OVER 202.1 km
n FUEL RANGE PREDICTION BY INSTRUMENT GAUGE AFTER PLATES: 114 km OVER 201.4 km
th

th

MAZDA 6GT TEST-4 15 /18 March 2014 / Tugun Ballina Tugun / 200km

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

m

PART 2: AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-4 / MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

56
PART 2 AFTER TEST 4

PART
m

3: MAZDA 6GT BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK

[U.F.O.] COMPARATIVE RESULTS FOR TEST-4

A)

SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-4

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 4:10PM

ROUT: TUGUN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 27C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 202.1 K
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 15.64 L
L/100KM: 15.64 L /202.1 km x 100 = 7.738 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/15.64 L x 202.1km = 801 KM
NB: The BEFORE Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plate Test
established 15.64 litres per 202.1km, or 7.738 litres
per 100 km, NOT COMPARABLE AND
CONSUMPTION WELL IN EXCESS to any section
defined on the sticker displayed on the windscreen
of the vehicle Right:

B))

SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-4

DATE: 18th MARCH 2014 / TIME 3:15PM
ROUT: TUGN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 28.5C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 201.4 KM
CONSUMPTION: 9.68 L
L/100KM: 9.68 L /201.4 km x 100 = 4.8 L/100 KM
62L TANK RANGE: 62 L/9.68 L x 201.4km = 1290 KM

NB: The AFTER Plasmotekk [U.F.O] Plate Test

established 9.97 litres per 202.2km, or 4.8 per 100km
comparable to the 4.8 litres per 100km shown on the
sticker displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle
which defined the test to be in the Extra Urban
driving range THIS OCCURRED ONLY WHEN
PLASMOTEKK PLATES WERE APPLIED Right:
RECOMMENDATION: CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE/S

57
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 4

C) PLASMOTEKK A) & B) RAW DATA ENTRY DERIVED FROM ACTUAL AND REAL ROAD TEST
CONDITIONS FOR COMPARATIVE FINAL RESULT CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN 99.5% -99.9%
RANGE OF ACCURACY. USING DATA COMPILED CALCULATIONS BELOW SHOW AN ACTUAL,
REAL AND MEASURED FUEL REDUCTION OF:

37.89% (Diesel)
Using A) & B) Final Fuel Reduction Calculation Was Made As Follows:
A)

SUMMARY: BEFORE PLASMOTEKK TEST-4

DATE: 15th MARCH 2014 / TIME: 4:10PM

ROUT: TUGUN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 27C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 202.1 K
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 144 km FOR 202.1 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 15.64 L

B)

SUMMARY: AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-4

DATE: 18th MARCH 2014 / TIME 4:00PM

ROUT: TUGUN BALLINA TUGUN
AVERAGE OUTSIDE TEMP: 28.5C
DRIVING: BY SPEED LIMIT
DISTANCE: 201.4 KM
FUEL RANGE
PREDICTION: 114 FOR 201.4 km
FUEL CONSUMPTION: 9.68 L

(i)

Calculation 1: Fuel Consumption of the BEFORE Test for exactly 200 Km Is:
15.64 L Divide By 202.1 Km = 0.0.07734 (L/K) Multiply 200 = 15.477 L for 200 Km

(ii)

Calculation 2: Fuel Consumption of the AFTER Test for exactly 200 Km Is:
9.68 L Divide By 201.4 Km = 0.048063 (L/K) Multiply 200 = 9.612 L for 200Km

(iii)

Calculation 3: Percentage of FUEL USED in AFTER Test Is:

9.612 L Divide By 15.477 L X by 100 = 62.105% of 15.477 L used in BEFORE Test
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------HENCE: Calculation for Percentage of Fuel Saving or FUEL REDUCTION Is:

(iv)

100% - 62.105% =

37.89% Reduction

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Points Of Note: Data Entry Points Of Interest:

FROM THE GRAPH OVER PAGE FUEL RANGE INSTRUMENT GAUGE PREDICTED:
(vi)
BEFORE PLATES: Initial Range 1015km Final Range 871km = 144 km for 202.2 km Trip.
(vii)
AFTER PLATES: Initial Range 1040km Final Range 926 km = 104 km for 201.4 km Trip.
(viii)
Conclusion of (i) & (ii): Because 37.89% Fuel Reduction is the ONLY ACTUAL KNOWN
MEASURED COMPONENT, in this case, the 2 comparison Range Gauge predictions appear
to be saying: the BEFORE Test prediction resulted in 144km to journey 202.1km while using

58
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 4

(ix)

(x)

15.64 Litres of Fuel, and the AFTER Test prediction resulted in 114km to journey 201.4km
while using 9.68 Litres of Fuel.
Yellow line on Graph shows where Vehicle is stopped at half way mark (100km) for 10 min
and Alters Range Gauge of BOTH Tests with Downward Glitch at same Points which it
should not when measuring Distance of Fuel.
NB: Conclusion of (i), (ii), (iIi) & (iv): With or without Plasmotekk Device fitted to any
vehicle, Range Gauge may be working accurately at some times, and working inaccurately
other times. Hence the reason Before and After Tests were conducted to determine Fuel
usage over the same Distance and Average Speed Travelled With On Road Driving Only.

The BEFORE Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test established 15.64 litres per 202.1km, or 7.74 litres per
100 km, NOT COMPARABLE AND CONSUMPTION WELL IN EXCESS to any section defined on the
sticker displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle.
The AFTER Plasmotekk Nano Plate Test established 9.68 litres per 201.4km, or 4.8 per 100km
comparable to the 4.8 litres per 100km displayed on the windscreen of the vehicle which defined
the test to be in the Extra Urban driving range - THIS OCCURRED ONLY WHEN PLASMOTEKK
PLATES WERE APPLIED.
IGNORING ALL OTHER PLASMOTEKK ZERO TOXIC EMISSION REPORTS SUCH AS CALIFORNIA CLEAN
AIR BOARD / ETS REPORTS, IN ALL PROBABILITY, PLASMOTEKK MINIMIZED EMSISSIONS TO AT
LEAST FIGURES DISPLAYED BY ADR81/02 AND MUCH GREATER BY THE DATA INPUT AND
CALCULATIONS ABOVE IN ADDITION TO REDUCING FUEL CONSUMPTION BY 37.89%.
RECOMMENDATION CONDUCT SAME TEST ON ANY MAZDA-6GT VEHICLE/S

Other Points Of Note:

a)

Before Average Temperature was 27C / After Average Temperature was 28.5C. The Plasmotekk
After Test was conducted with an Average of 1.5C increase in Temperature than the Before
Test. Because Fuel efficiency decreases as temperature increases and the calculation of 1.5C
increase in temperature was not entered into the final calculation, in this case, further
enhances final result of 37.89% fuel reduction of the After Test conducted by PLASMOTEKK.

b) Plasmotekk Plates Series used for PART 2: MAZDA 6GT AFTER PLASMOTEKK TEST-4 are shown
th
below, left: UFOMV-2-1 Series was chosen for the 18 March 2014, 201.4km After test run
from Helensvale, Brisbane Helensvale which achieved Fuel Reduction of 37.89%.
m

59
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 4

d)) Right: This is

typical carbon
build up on a
MAZDA 6GT. The
near new vehicle
was picked up
from Oldmac
dealership to
begin
Plasmotekk road
th
test on 15
March 2014.

15th March 2014

17th March 2014

MAZDA 6GT

MAZDA 6GT

18th March 2014

MAZDA 6GT

With minimal exposure over a 3 day period, Plasmotekk device achieved an average fuel reduction
of 44.12% producing Zero Toxic Emissions resulting from Dramatic Fuel-Air Burn rate evident also
by exhaust pipes becoming clean and carbon free in all driving conditions shown above.

Dramatic fuel efficiency is accompanied by 10-20% power increase, with smoother,

cleaner and quieter running engine.

Note:
the

EACH YEAR PER 20,000 KM 1 KILOGRAM OF PLASMOTEKK CAN PREVENT:

- 4 Tons of Poisonous Carbon Monoxide (CO) from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even more Poisonous NoX from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even greater Poisonous SoX from going into the Atmosphere.
NB: Only Co2 can be absorbed by Forests. NoX and SoX have been exponentially building up in
the Atmosphere since the development of the Internal Combustion Engine almost a 100 years ago.

END OF DOCUMENTATION FOR:

PART 3: BEFORE & AFTER PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] TEST-4 /
COMPARATIVE RESULTS MAZDA 6GT VEHICLE

60
PART 3 BEFORE AFTER TEST 4

PLASMOTEKK
m

E.M. Seewald March 2014

TM