Evaluation of Teaching

Instructor Name: Courtney Gamston

Date of Teaching: 2/26/15

Presentation Title: Introduction to Dermatology

Audience/Course: P1

Competency
Objectives

Delivery

Professionalism

Organization

Content

Outstanding
Performance
(5 points)
All objectives are clear
and use measurable
defined terms (e.g., list,
identify, contrast,
compare). Encompass a
variety of action verbs.
Appropriate number of
objectives for length of
presentation.
Audible, good enunciation,
rate, and tone. Proper
pronunciation and use of
terms. Poised, polished.
Presentation is
extemporaneous.
May serve as a role
model. No deficiencies in
attendance, punctuality, or
dependability.
Organized, logical flow.
Concise discussion. All
statements
interconnected. Major
points highlighted
completely.
Level appropriate.
Incorporates clinical or
other applications.
Accurate and reliable
information consistently
presented. Questions
answered consistently and
appropriately.

Meets Expectations
(4 points)
Most objectives are
clear and measurable.
Little overlap in
objective action verbs.
Number of objectives
reasonable for length of
presentation.

Needs Some
Improvement
(3 points)
Most objectives not
measurable and clear.
Objectives overlap in
action verbs. Number
of objectives somewhat
inappropriate given
length of presentation.

Consistently audible,
rate and tone are
appropriate. Few
distractions. Handout
used as reference only.

Some words lost to

mumbling. Rate and
tone sometimes
slow/fast. Somewhat
rehearsed.

Generally seen as a
role model. All
behaviors appropriate.

Occasional behaviors
not consistent with
expectations.

Majority of presentation
flows logically. Most
major points
highlighted.

Difficult to follow all

thoughts. Some ideas
not well interconnected.
Major points sparsely
highlighted.

Presentation mostly
level appropriate. Many
applications highlighted.
Most information is
accurate and reliable.
Questions answered
well.

Some content not level

appropriate.
Applications not
consistently
demonstrated or
highlighted. Some
answers incomplete or
inaccurate.

Evaluator Name: Keeli Michael

*No points awarded for items that are not observed or do not apply.
Competency
Outstanding
Meets Expectations
Performance
(4 points)
(5 points)
Audiovisuals/
AVs and handout are
AVs and handout
Handout
used to augment
somewhat augment
(please attach
presentation. AVs and
presentation. Handout
handout to this
handout are clear and
and AVs are mostly
document)
without typographical or
clear and without error.
spelling errors.
Teaching Skills
Able to consistently and
Effectively
clearly communicate
communicates almost
teaching points and instill
all material being
critical thinking in
taught. Usually elicits
learners. Actively works
critical thinking. Works
to improve skills by
to improve teaching
engaging in various
skills.
teaching activities.

Needs Some
Improvement
(3 points)
AVs and handout
sometimes detract from
presentation. Some
typos or spelling errors
exist.

Needs Significant
Improvement
(2 points)
AVs and handout are
difficult to follow and
distract listener. Many
errors detected.

Generally able to
communicate teaching
point. Requires some
assistance from
preceptor. Rarely
engages in teaching
activities.

Frequently unable to
effectively teach.
Creates more ambiguity
in the learner than
understanding. Does not
seek out teaching
opportunities.

Unsatisfactory
Performance
(1 point)
AVs and handout
completely detract from
presentation. AVs and
handout are laden with
errors or are unable to
be read.
Consistently avoids
teaching. Unable to
communicate points
without causing
confusion. Never
focuses on critical
thinking skills. Does
not seek out
opportunities to improve
skills.

Resident Teaching Strengths

Great presentation! Presentations were well formatted and developed.
Delivery of presentation was professional and logical.

Suggestions for Improvement

Strong flow at the beginning without the use of filler words, but ums became more common as the
presentation went on. Some of the slides contained a lot of content.

Additional Comments

Awesome job!

Score*
Slides were
excellent and
formatted well.
Nice use of
pictures to
demonstrate
content.

Spoke very
clearly and
logically.