ASSIGMENT MIDTEST

ELECTRE METHOD

IMAM MUKHRI
12522276

DEPARTEMENT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

FACULTY TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY
UNIVERSITY ISLAM INDONESIA
2015

ELECTRE methods including on multiple criteria decision analysis methods that originated in Europe
in the 1960s. ELECTRE is the acronym of Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la ralit or in English
means Expressing Elimination and Choice Reality. According to Janko and Bernoider (2005: 11),
ELECTRE is one of multiple criteria decision making method based on the concept of outranking using
pairwise comparison of alternatives based on any appropriate criteria. ELECTRE methods used in
conditions where alternative which is less in accordance with the criteria eliminated and suitable
alternative can be generated. In other words, ELECTRE used for cases with many alternatives but few
criteria are involved (Setiyawati). An alternative is said to dominate another alternative if one or more
of the criteria are exceeded (in comparison to other alternative criteria) and together with other criteria
remaining (Kusumadewi, 2006). Measures undertaken in problem solving using ELECTRE method is
as follows:

Model
Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda
weight
normalization
civic
saturn
ford
mazda
sum
sqrt

Rij

7
8
9
6

9
7
6
7

Economi
cs
9
8
8
8

0.3

0.4

49
64
81
36
230
15.165750
89

reliability
81
49
36
49
215
14.662878
3

0.3
economic
s
81
64
64
64
273
16.52271
164

0.4615663
31
0.5275043
79
0.5934424
26
0.3956282
84

0.6137949
06
0.4773960
38
0.4091966
04
0.4773960
38

0.544704
779
0.484182
026
0.484182
026
0.484182
026

model

w preperation
Wij/Sum Wij

Vij

reliability

0.3
0.3

model

0.4
0.4

reliability

0.3
0.3
economic
s

Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda

0.1384698
99
0.1582513
14
0.1780327
28
0.1186884
85

concordance
Civic

C12
C13
C14

Saturn

C24
C31

0.0395628
28

C32

0.0197814
14

C34
Mazda

0.3
0.0197814
14
0.0395628
28
0.0197814
14
0.0197814
14
0.0197814
14
0.0395628
28

C21
C23

Ford

0.2455179
62
0.1909584
15
0.1636786
41
0.1909584
15

C41
C42
C43

0.0593442
43
0.0197814
14
0.0395628
28
0.0593442
43

0.163411
434
0.145254
608
0.145254
608
0.145254
608
0.4

0.3

0.054559
547

0.018156
826

0.081839
321
0.054559
547
0.054559
547

0.018156
826
0.018156
826
0.018156
826

0.027279
774

0
0.081839
321
0.027279
774
0.027279
774
0.054559
547

0
0.018156
826

0.027279
774

0
0
0.018156
826

C matrix

Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda

X
0.3
0.3
0

0.7
X
0.6
0.7

0.7
0.7
X
0.7

1
1
0.6
X

Discordance
Civic

D12
D13
D14

Saturn

D21
D23
D24

Ford

D31
D32
D34

Mazda

D41
D42
D43

bellow
up max
max
0.019781 0.054559
414
547
0.039562 0.081839
828
321
0.054559
547
0.019781
414

0.054559
547
0.027279
774

0.081839
321
0.027279
774
0.027279

0.081839
321
0.027279
774
0.059344

0.3
0.0197814
14
0.0395628
28
0.0197814
14
0.0197814
14
0.0197814
14
0.0395628
28
0.0395628
28
0.0197814
14
0.0593442
43
0.0197814
14
0.0395628
28
0.0593442
43

0.4
0.054559
547
0.081839
321
0.054559
547
0.054559
547
0.027279
774

0.3
0.018156
826
0.018156
826
0.018156
826
0.018156
826

0
0.081839
321
0.027279
774
0.027279
774
0.054559
547

0
0.018156
826

0
0.027279
774

0
0
0.018156
826

774
0.054559
547
0.039562
828
0.059344
243

243
0.054559
547
0.039562
828
0.059344
243

matrix
Discordance

Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda
Threshold
Value

0.362565
586

0.483420
782
0.725131
173

1
1

1
1

x
1

0
0
0.459686
945
x

Corcodanc Discordanc
e
e
0.6083333
0.6692337
33
07

Matrix F

Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda

x
0
0
0

1
x
0
1

1
1
x
1

1
1
0
x

x
1
1
1

0
x
1
1

0
1
x
1

0
0
0
x

x
0
0
0

0
x
0
1

0
1
x
1

Matrix G

Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda
agregate dominance

Civic
Saturn
Ford
Mazda

0
0
0
x

Hence, Mazda will be alternatives that choose because of Mazda have the biggest
value of aggregate dominance