Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
own terms what steps they wish to take towards recovery. Because this approach places the
responsibility on the affected individual, professors and other university officials would not
be legally required to intervene in a situation where they may believe the student needs
help. However, this approach may prevent an affected person from receiving the treatment
they need, as well as alienate family and friends.
Ultimately, it was concluded that intervention depends upon the severity of the
situation and upon the specific individual. While each situation is different, it was generally
agreed upon that moral obligation may be better than legal obligation when it comes to
mental illness. Suggested steps that could be taken in the future include: mandating that Penn
State RAs schedule time with residents to allow for them to have a one on one conversation
and mandating that the University provides a support system specifically for students seeking
help with mental illness.
There was discussion on the funding of mental health services at Penn State and
throughout Pennsylvania. While there was an unexpected consensus that mental health
professionals are not vital to everyones fight against stress induced depression, it was also
agreed that Penn States Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) should be able to
provide treatment and medication to students in a timely manner if they decide to seek it.
From the individual survey, 90% of participants believed that CAPS should be allotted more
resources. Others thought that the budget for CAPS should be revamped, sighting the
understaffed faculties and roundabout method of seeing a clinician. Improving long-term
funding toward statewide mental health services would require Governor Wolf to take action
and allocate resources and funding for these specific programs. At Penn State and throughout
Pennsylvania, to achieve any progress in funding, it is necessary to recognize not just the
explicit benefits in funding these services, but also the intrinsic value that will serve to
improve the reputation and quality of mental health services statewide.
The key goal of a deliberation is to reach a point of stasis, which even though a
solution cannot be fully resolved, the conversation spurs new ideas and finds a meeting
ground between the differing approaches that were presented during the discussion. By
utilizing a simple survey, we could concluded that 75% of students think it is the students
right to choose when to get help and 10% of students believe that there are adequate
resources at Penn State. This significant difference in values identifies the populations
understanding of the problem, but does identify a solution. These are generalized statements
to prove that something needs to be done. The university, state, and country need to heighten
awareness for mental illness. Colleges across the country are experiencing higher stressinduced depression and anxiety rates than ever before. The student body understands that
funds need to be allocated, students need to be educated, and the ill need to be rehabilitated.
This health issue will not go away without investment, just like mental illnesses will not go
away without treatment. Penn State needs to amend the mental health policy to compensate
for the fluctuations in the mental state of the student body. The changes will only come to
fruition with the allocation of funding, resources and a heightened awareness through
education on clinical treatment of serious mental illnesses.