Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
As the reading specialist, I am working in collaboration with our building Learning Consultant
(Merritt) and third grade teaching team (Gina and Megan) to provide professional development
to our staff incorporating a literacy structure supported by research. Gina and Megan have been
using the Daily Five structure and CAFE strategies extremely effectively in third grade; however,
many of our teachers have showed interest but havent had the opportunity to see how the
structure can be implemented in their own grade level classrooms. The CAF Book is a guide
for instruction and an extension to The Daily Five. CAF is a collection of strategies the learner
can access to apply reading strategies during each reading experience along the gradual
release of responsibility (Boushey & Moser, 2009). The CAF board is also serves as a visual
aid tool to help students. Students refer to a large poster with the strategies listed, placing a
sticky note with their name next to the one theyre working on. The teachers in our building
showed a great deal of interest in The Daily Five and CAF, therefore, I wanted to provide an
opportunity though a school-wide PD where they could gain a greater sense of the Daily Five
and CAF and the remarkable results that Gina and Megans students have acquired in
comprehension, fluency, decoding/phonics, and vocabulary development. As a reading
specialist, I will ensure that all materials are in order prior to the PD: The Smart Board is
operational, PowerPoint is properly installed with a backup on thumb drive, printed copies of
The Daily Five schedule and strategies used in Megans room and a sign-up sheet are provided.
D. Timeline
I met with Gina, Megan and Merritt in September to discuss my project and verify their
availability to meet and establish a timeline for implementing The Daily Five PD. Beginning in
the second week of October, Gina, Megan, Merritt and I met on Tuesdays for four weeks at
7:30am (one half hour prior to the start of the school day). My goal was to have Gina and
Megan embed some of the video they recorded at the end of last year when I observed their
students working with a tremendous sense of autonomy and how they flourished after weeks of
exposure working with the Daily Five. I also wanted the staff to see just how The Daily Five is
implemented early in the school year so that staff members have a clear understanding of the
organization process, the tools used in rotations, and the physical make up of the room itself.
After the PD is held on November 12, 2014 at 3:30-4:20pm. I informed the staff that I would be
available after the new-year to assist anyone interested in implementing The Daily Five into their
classrooms.
Part II: Project Implementation & Artifacts
A. Implementation
After observing Megans third grade classroom last year to see first hand how and
what The Daily Five and CAF system looked like in action, I decided that as an
acting literacy coach it would be extremely beneficial for our entire staff to receive
professional development in structuring their classroom literacy blocks.
In our first meeting, Gina, Megan, Merritt, and I discussed the routines and
framework of the Daily Five used in the their classrooms and the best way to
integrate this learning structure into all k-5 classrooms. We felt it was critical for the
teaching staff to observe other teachers modeling the Daily Five routines and
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
B. Artifacts
The artifacts included in this project include:
The Daily Five PowerPoint (See project folder for this artifact regarding this project).
Megans Daily Five strategies and class schedule
Pictures of students using the Daily Five components working independently and
in small groups
Pictures of CAF goal setting strategies used in Megans classroom
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
Daily Five: Read to Self, Work on Writing, Read to Someone, Word Work, Listen to
Reading
Monday Friday: Students must read and write each day. Students choose the order
and when they do their activities.
When students check in with me, they choose three activities from the daily five to do in
the three sessions of the day. They must read and write each day, however they can
choose when they do these activities and what their third option is.
Ex: 1. Read 2. Write 3. Word Work
1. Read to someone 2. Write 3. Read
2. 1. Write 2. Listen 3. Read
Within the five-day week, students have to have all parts of the daily five
complete.
Example Week:
Monday: 1. R 2. W 3. RS
Tuesday: 1. W 2. WW 3. R
Wednesday: 1. R 2. R 3. W
Thursday: 1. R 2. L 3. W
Friday: 1. R 2. WW 3. W
Monday:
Check in 5 minutes
Break into sessions
Session 1 12-15 minutes
Session 2 12-15 minutes
Session 3 12-15 minutes
Song for clean up transition 1-2 minutes
Reflection: Check Logs 1-2 Minutes
Tuesday:
Mini-Lesson: Read making meaning book, or another story.
Introduce and teach a CAF strategy. Assign IDR 10-12
Minutes
Check in 5 minutes
Break into sessions
Session 1 10-12 minutes
Session 2 10-12 minutes
Session 3 10-12 minutes
Song for clean up transition 1-2 minutes
Reflection: Share IDR 1-2 Minutes
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
Wednesday:
Check in 5 minutes
Break into sessions
Session 1 12-15 minutes
Session 2 12-15 minutes
Session 3 12-15 minutes
Song for clean up transition 1-2 minutes
Reflection: Check Logs 1-2 Minutes
Friday:
Check in 5 minutes
Break into sessions
Session 1 12-15 minutes
Session 2 12-15 minutes
Session 3 12-15 minutes
Song for clean up transition 1-2 minutes
Reflection: Check Logs 1-2 Minutes
During each session I meet with guided reading groups, Monday- Thursday. I have four
guided reading groups that I meet with twice a week, and one skill group I meet with
once a week. I meet with groups first and second sessions Mon-Wed and then the third
session I conference with individuals or give running records. Thursdays, I meet all three
sessions because of my skill group. Fridays I grade my Friday Folders.
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
A
Armon
F
Armon
Rebecca
Alex
Rebecca
Alex
Rebecca
Gavan
Ethan
David
Storm
Josh
Jack
Gabriella
Gabriela
Isabella
Lauren
N
O
Gavan
Gabriella
Josh
Jack
Gabriela
Lauren
Jack
Storm
Trisha
Grace
Emily
Grace
Jackson
Alex
Rami
Katie
Sandhya
David
Rachel
Haley
Alex
David
Katie
From there I look to see if I can make groupings of kids that are AROUND the same
level and need the same skill. That is how I group my students. Then in GR I use this as
my main focus, however, I also cover whatever concepts we discuss in Making Meaning,
and our Caf lessons.
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
C
K
L
M
N
O
A
Armon
Alex
Rebecca
Jack
Gabriella
Lauren
Jack
Storm
Gavan
David
Storm
Ethan
Josh
Gabriela
Isabella
Lauren
Trisha
Emily
Grace
Jackson
Alex
Rami
Katie
Sandhya
David
Rachel
Haley
Armon, Rebecca, Alex See Ms. Golick (LC) every morning from 10:
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
Listen to Reading
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
Part III: Professional Reflection on Project
A. Reflection on Project Impact
I feel that our staff viewed this PD as an effective transformational tool. From the
questions and comments we received, several teachers showed great interest in
knowing that The Daily Five and CAF are really just structures that can be
implemented and modified in any classroom setting. Kindergarten teachers
asked about the Daily Three and 5th grade teachers were interested in the core
elements of the CAF system for tracking student growth. Based on the
conversations that took place during the PD, I followed up with Laurens inquiry of
the Daily Three by informing her that the Daily Three consisted of Read to Self,
Read to Someone, and Work on Writing. And depending on her children in
kindergarten, the time allotted for these independent behaviors would vary based
on the time of the year but stamina will grow as they do throughout the year. In
another reaffirming testimony, Angela (first grade teacher) stated that since our
PD, she has had more success with conferring with her students progress after
she created a conferring notebook that she modified from Ginas classroom.
Across the board, the PD was well received and I felt a tremendous sense of
self-satisfaction after all of the hard work that has gone into this project and the
impact it has had on our staff.
B. Reflection on Professional Growth as Reading Specialist
As a Reading Specialist, collaboration with your entire staff is critical and it truly
builds a greater sense of community and I feel very lucky to have that at
Brewster Elementary. By conducting this PD, our staff has been exposed to a
structure that is grounded and driven on student independence thus allowing
teachers more time for explicit teaching to support literacy growth.
Through this experience, I saw how even seasoned teachers were open to
positive change. They didnt view The Daily 5 as one more thing they had to add
to their day but more as an effective way to organize and balance their literacy
instruction.
RDG 6940 Framework for Planning, Enacting, and Reflecting On Practicum Projects
References
Allington, R. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing Research-Based
Programs. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Boushey, G., & Moser, J. (2009). The CAF Book: Engaging All students in Daily Literacy
Assessment & Instruction. Portland, Me.: Stenhouse.
Boushey, G., & Moser, J. (2006). The daily 5: Fostering Literacy Independence in the
Elementary Grades. Portland, Me.: Stenhouse.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension to Enhance
Understanding. York, Me.: Stenhouse.
Pearson, P., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The Instruction of Reading Comprehension. Champaign,
Ill.: The Center.