Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a
shift
in
practice
with
regards
to
the
populations
with
whom
we
serve.
Where
once,
it
may
have
been
accepted
practice
to
conduct
an
evaluation
on
a
child
through
the
use
of
a
single
cognitive
assessment,
today,
we
are
tasked
with
gathering
a
thorough
body
of
evidence
about
each
students
social
and
academic
history
before
any
decisions
related
to
additional
supports
or
services
can
be
made.
By
allowing
the
time
to
consider
all
of
the
available
information
we
have,
both
as
school
psychologists
and
as
members
of
the
special
education
team,
we
ensure
that
any
decisions
we
make,
which
can
have
far-reaching
consequences
for
a
child,
are
made
judiciously.
Possessing
a
more
complete
picture
of
a
students
background
and
educational
history
can
also
uncover
strengths
that
he
or
she
may
possess
that
may
have
gone
unnoticed
had
only
traditional
quantitative
measures
been
utilized.
especially
true
for
children
who
are
culturally
and/or
linguistically
diverse.
Many
of
these
children,
including
those
who
are
English
language
learners
(ELLs),
have
lived
and
been
educated
in
environments
that
differ
greatly
from
the
mainstream
culture
in
a
myriad
of
unique
ways,
including:
language
development;
the
importance
of
gender
roles;
religion;
and
other
cultural
customs.
Therefore,
careful
consideration
of
their
history
is
vital
to
the
promotion
of
fairness
and
justice
in
education.
School
psychologists
and
other
educators
alike,
are
wise
to
remember
that
parents
are
the
foremost
experts
on
their
children
and
that
our
ability
to
learn
from
them
never
ceases,
regardless
of
our
own
degree
of
knowledge
and
experience.
collection
through
parent
and
teacher
interviews,
classroom
observations,
and
1:1
interviews
with
students
in
order
to
compile
a
holistic,
qualitative,
sampling
of
a
students
present
level
of
social-emotional
abilities
and
academic
performance.
Both
artifacts
contain
a
comprehensive
body
of
evidence
that
was
gathered
prior
to
making
the
decision
to
utilize
more
in-depth,
norm-referenced,
assessments.
These
assessments
were
then
carefully
selected
so
as
to
ensure
that
they
were
both
culturally
and
linguistically
appropriate
to
the
target
population.
The first artifact contains a body of evidence that was collected through
interviews
with
the
students
mother
and
classroom
teacher,
progress
monitoring
data
obtained
from
the
building
MTSS
team,
classroom
observations,
as
well
as
behavioral
observations
made
during
testing.
The
Kaufman
Assessment
Battery
for
Children
-
Second
Edition
(KABC-II)
was
selected
to
measure
the
students
overall
cognitive
abilities.
The
KABC-II
is
the
preferred
cognitive
assessment
for
Spanish-
speaking
students
who
are
English
language
learners
but
possess
the
requisite
language
ability,
as
indicated
by
their
WIDA
Access
scores
and
comparisons
to
culturally
and
linguistically
similar
peers,
to
be
tested
in
English.
The
assessment
was
designed
to
help
streamline
administration
by
removing
excess
language
from
the
test
administrators
directions,
which
can
often
pose
a
significant
barrier
to
not
only
ELLs,
but
also
those
who
have
speech-language
difficulties
or
struggle,
cognitively,
with
verbal
comprehension.
Therefore,
the
KABC-II
is
a
preferred
assessment
tool
for
helping
to
ensure
the
validity
of
assessments
conducted
on
both
culturally
and
linguistically
diverse
and
monolingual,
mainstream,
English-speaking
students.
DENVER
PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
Psychological
Report
Student:
Zoe
Reyes
School:
Barnum
Elem.
SP
Intern:
Andrew
Alberti
ID
#:
XXXXXX
DOB:
XX/XX/XX
Grade:
1
Report
Date:
02/24/2015
Age
at
Testing:
6yr
6mo
Language:
English
Zoes
performance
remained
flat.
The
MTSS
team,
including
Zoes
mother,
Ms.
Reyes,
considered
the
possibility
of
referring
her
for
a
special
education
evaluation
but
deferred
their
decision
on
the
basis
that
inconsistencies
in
her
progress
made
it
difficult
to
rule
out
her
ability
to
make
continued
growth
following
the
introduction
of
more
intensive
supports.
In
early
February,
the
team
met
once
more
and
the
reading
interventionist
shared
that
little
to
no
progress
had
been
made
despite
providing
Zoe
with
an
increased
level
of
support.
The
MTSS
team
made
the
recommendation
that
an
initial
evaluation
for
special
education
services
be
initiated,
to
which
Ms.
Reyes
agreed.
Parent
Interview
Zoes
mother,
Ms.
Reyes,
reports
that
Zoe
is
an
only
child
and
that
she
has
not
seen
her
father
in
several
years.
However,
she
does
frequently
spend
time
with
her
grandparents
and
uncle
who
reside
apart
from
them.
Zoe
is
a
monolingual,
English-
speaker
who
was
born
in
the
United
States.
Ms.
Reyes
also
reports
being
monolingual.
Zoe
was
not
previously
enrolled
in
any
pre-school
programs
and
began
her
education
in
August
2013
at
Barnum
Elementary.
At
home,
Ms.
Reyes
noted
that
Zoe
is
always
hyperactive,
likes
to
run
around
a
lot
and
enjoys
doing
activities
that
are
hands
on,
like
using
play-dough.
When
she
first
began
kindergarten
at
Barnum
last
year,
she
was
initially
very
nervous
about
going
to
school
and
would
often
become
upset
after
her
mom
dropped
her
off
in
the
morning.
Ms.
Reyes
indicates
that
Zoe
now
appears
much
more
comfortable
with
going
to
school,
which,
her
mother
suggests,
may
be
why
she
has
been
acting
out
more
lately.
Zoes
mother
has
also
experienced
significant
difficulty
helping
Zoe
to
complete
her
homework,
which
she
attributes
to
her
difficulties
with
attention.
Often,
she
will
work
through
a
homework
problem
with
her,
then
ask
her
how
to
do
the
next
one
a
few
minutes
later
and
she
wont
remember
what
to
do.
Teacher
Interview
Zoes
classroom
teacher
reports
that
she
was
initially
quite
shy
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
but
has
since
begun
to
engage
more
with
her
peers.
She
is
friends
with
several
girls
in
her
class
and
will
usually
choose
to
work
with
them
during
partner
activities.
However,
her
teacher
indicates
that
this
can
sometimes
be
problematic
as
Zoe
is
easily
drawn
off
task
and
she
has
also
noticed
that
some
of
her
friends
will
help
her
with
group
work
by
providing
her
with
the
answers.
Zoes
teacher
admits
that
she
is
sometimes
unsure
if
Zoe
talking
to
her
friends
or
staring
off
during
work
time
is
due
to
her
difficulty
maintaining
focus
or,
rather,
if
it
is
because
an
of
inability
to
follow
along
with
the
pace
of
instruction.
Classroom
Observations
Zoe
was
observed
during
specials,
in
the
library,
on
Tuesday,
February
24,
around
10:30
in
the
morning.
Initially
the
class
was
seated
together
on
the
floor
while
the
librarian
gave
them
instructions
on
the
new
research
project
they
were
going
to
begin
working
on.
The
students
were
asked
to
think
of
an
animal
that
they
might
enjoy
researching
and
then
sharing
information
about
with
the
class.
Many
students
were
allowed
to
work
alone
on
this
activity;
however,
Zoe
was
one
of
about
8
students
who
were
put
into
partners.
Once
the
teacher
finished
giving
directions,
Zoe
and
her
partner
began
chatting
with
each
other
and
Zoe
appeared
to
be
happy
to
work
with
her.
When
her
partner
began
talking
about
which
animal
they
should
research,
Zoe
became
noticeably
quieter
leading
her
partner
to
ultimately
choose
goldfish.
Each
of
the
24
students
in
the
class
was
given
a
worksheet
and
split
into
four
tables,
each
consisting
of
six
students.
For
the
next
ten
minutes,
Zoe
sat
at
her
table
appearing
happy
to
be
amongst
a
group
of
her
friends.
At
times,
she
was
observed
looking
around
the
table
as
well
as
around
the
room
as
if
confused
by
something.
Zoe
also
looked
over
at
her
partners
paper
on
multiple
occasions;
attempting
to
write
down
the
sentence
that
she
had
written.
Testing
Observations
Zoe
was
tested
on
one
occasion
for
approximately
75
minutes.
She
approached
the
testing
session
with
a
willingness
to
give
her
best
effort
and
remained
focused
on
each
task
she
was
presented
with
during
the
assessment.
Zoe
appeared
to
have
difficulty
following
directions
and
needed
multiple
repetitions/demonstrations
on
teachable
items
on
multiple
subtests.
She
sat
calmly
and
remained
quiet
throughout
testing.
These
results
are
considered
to
be
a
valid
estimate
of
Zoes
current
cognitive
functioning.
Assessment
Results
Kaufman
Assessment
Battery
for
Children
-
Second
Edition
(KABC-II)
The
KABC-II
was
administered
to
assess
Zoes
intellectual
functioning.
Subtest
scores
on
the
KABC-II
are
standardized
to
have
a
mean
of
10
and
a
standard
deviation
of
3.
This
means
that
2
out
of
3
people
will
obtain
subtest
scores
between
7
and
13.
The
global
and
index
scores
have
a
mean
of
100
and
a
standard
deviation
of
15;
thus,
2
out
of
3
people
will
obtain
global
and
index
scores
between
85
and
115.
In
interpreting
the
cognitive
testing
results
below,
it
is
important
to
keep
in
mind
that
the
Upper
Extreme
range
includes
standard
scores
from
131-160,
Above
Average
range
includes
standard
scores
from
116-130,
Average
range
is
comprised
of
scores
from
85-115,
Below
Average
range
includes
scores
from
70-84,
and
Lower
Extreme
scores
range
from
40-69.
Zoes
scores
on
the
KABC-II
were
as
follows:
Scale/Subtest
Standard/
Description
Percentile
Scaled
Score
Sequential/Gsm
83
Below
Average
13th
Number
Recall
6
Word
Order
8
Simultaneous/Gv
76
Below
Average
5th
Conceptual
Thinking
8
Rover
6
Triangles
Pattern
Reasoning
Learning/Glr
Atlantis
Atlantis
Delayed
Rebus
Rebus
Delayed
Mental
Processing
Index
(MPI)
4
7
92
8
8
9
11
Average
30th
78
As
per
Dr.
Kozlowskis
instructions,
the
Knowledge/Gc
scale
of
the
KABC-II,
which
measures
a
childs
ability
to
apply
their
crystallized
knowledge,
or
that
obtained
through
instruction
and/or
immersion
in
the
dominant
culture
of
the
United
States,
was
not
assessed
during
testing.
However;
it
should
be
noted
that
because
Zoe
is
a
monolingual,
English-speaker,
who
was
born
in
the
United
States,
it
is
likely
that
she
could
have
been
administered
the
full
test
battery,
including
the
Knowledge/Gc
scale,
without
compromising
the
validity
of
the
assessment.
The
three
remaining
indices
of
the
KABC-II
combine
into
a
global
score:
the
Mental
Processing
Index
(MPI).
On
the
Sequential/Gsm
scale,
a
measure
of
Zoes
ability
to
hold
information
in
immediate
awareness/short
term
memory
and
then
use
that
information
in
a
few
seconds
before
it
is
forgotten,
Zoe
scored
in
the
Below
Average
range
(SS=83).
This
suggests
that
Zoes
abilities
in
this
area
are
below
those
of
her
same-age
peers.
In
comparison,
her
working
memory
abilities
were
better
than
12
out
of
100
of
her
peers,
placing
her
in
the
13th
percentile.
On
the
Simultaneous/Gv:
scale,
Zoe
earned
a
standard
score
of
76,
which
is
within
the
Below
Average
range.
This
scale
measures
the
ability
to
perceive,
manipulate,
and
think
with
visual
patterns
and
stimuli,
and
to
mentally
rotate
objects
in
space.
Simultaneous
processing
demands
big
picture
spatial
integration
of
information
in
order
to
solve
problems
with
maximum
efficiency.
Zoes
score
indicates
performance
significantly
below
that
of
her
peers.
On
the
Learning/Glr
scale,
Zoe
earned
a
standard
score
of
92,
which
is
within
the
Average
range.
Zoe
was
taught
verbal
labels
(names)
that
are
paired
with
visual
stimuli
(pictures).
She
first
had
to
learn
these
paired
associations
and
then
recall
them
both
immediately
after
they
were
presented,
and
then,
following
a
delay
of
about
25
minutes.
The
attentional
requirements
for
the
learning
tasks
are
considerable
because
focused,
sustained,
and
selective
attention
is
required
for
success.
Zoes
ability
to
learn
new
information,
store
it
into
long-term
memory,
and
then
efficiently
retrieve
it
is
a
relative
area
of
strength
for
her.
The
Mental
Processing
Index
(MPI)
focuses
on
the
way
that
the
mind
works
and
deemphasizes
acquired
knowledge.
This
overall
score
measured
Zoes
short-term
memory,
visual
processing
abilities,
as
well
as
her
long-term
storage
and
retrieval
abilities.
Zoes
MPI
standard
score
of
78
is
in
the
Below
Average
range,
placing
her
score
in
7th
percentile,
indicating
that
her
cognitive
abilities
are
more
developed
than
6
out
of
100
of
her
same-age
peers.
Summary
Zoe
is
a
6-year-old
girl,
who
is
currently
in
the
first
grade
at
Barnum
Elementary
in
Denver
Public
Schools.
She
is
a
monolingual,
English-speaker,
who
was
born
in
the
United
States.
Her
general
cognitive
ability,
as
measured
by
the
KABC-II,
is
in
the
Below
Average
range
(MPI
=
78).
Zoes
working
memory
and
perceptual
reasoning
abilities
were
also
both
in
the
Below
Average
range
(Sequential/Gsm
=
83;
Simultaneous/Gv
=
76).
Based
on
this
assessment,
Zoe
demonstrates
relative
strengths
in
her
ability
to
encode,
store,
and
retrieve
information
from
long-term
memory.
She
demonstrates
weaknesses
in
working
memory,
planning
ability,
and
the
ability
to
mentally
organize
abstract
visual
information.
Zoes
performance
on
this
assessment
suggests
that
she
may
experience
difficulty
in
keeping
up
with
her
peers
in
a
wide
variety
of
situations
that
require
age-appropriate
thinking
and
reasoning
abilities.
Furthermore,
information
obtained
from
her
mother
and
teacher
regarding
her
difficulties
with
attention,
when
combined
with
observations
of
her
behavior
in
the
classroom
and
testing
environments
may
indicate
that
her
below
average
ability
to
take
in
and
process
information
leads
to
her
feeling
overwhelmed
by
the
academic
demands
of
the
classroom.
Zoes
behaviors
of
looking
around
the
classroom
and
seeking
out
support
from
peers
seem
to
be
indicative
of
her
feeling
unsure
how
to
complete
the
directions
shes
been
given,
or,
in
some
cases,
the
actual
meaning
of
the
directions
themselves.
Further
investigation
into
whether
or
not
Zoes
difficulties
with
attention
extend
to
unstructured
environments,
including
recess,
lunch,
or
at
home,
may
be
warranted
to
determine
if
her
behavior
relates
to
her
feeling
lost
or
unaware
of
expectations
or
if
it
can
be
attributed
to
underlying
social
emotional
issues.
Recommendations
1)
To
assist
with
her
deficits
in
working
memory,
Zoe
would
likely
benefit
from
having
verbal
directions
paired
with
visual
instructions
and
examples,
when
new
material
is
being
introduced.
2)
To
address
difficulties
with
task
completion:
a.
Divide
large
assignments
into
smaller
parts
b.
Positive
reinforcement
(e.g.
stickers,
verbal
praise)
for
persisting
with
challenging
assignments
3)
To
assist
with
her
deficits
in
working
memory,
Zoe
would
likely
benefit
from
frequent
check-ins
by
the
instructor
throughout
the
course
of
a
lesson
or
activity
to
ensure
that
she
is
following
along
with
the
material
and
understands
expectations.
4)
To
support
her
overall
health,
ensure
that
Zoe
arrives
at
school
well
rested
and
has
the
opportunity
to
eat
breakfast
before
school
starts.
_______________________________________
Andrew
Alberti
School
Psychologist
Intern
Katherine
Kozlowski,
Ph.D.,
NCSP
School
Psychologist
The
second
artifact
is
comprised
of
a
myriad
of
qualitative
data
obtained
from
the
students
mother,
teacher,
and
the
student
himself.
Based
on
both
anecdotal
report
and
direct
observation
of
the
students
difficulties
with
attention,
hyperactivity,
defiance,
and
aggression,
the
Behavior
Assessment
System
for
Children-Second
Edition
(BASC-2)
was
selected
to
screen
for
a
wide-range
of
social
emotional
issues,
through
surveys
administered
to
the
mother,
teacher,
and
child.
The
BASC-2
is
a
highly
regarded
screening
tool
utilized
in
both
clinical
and
educational
settings
for
the
preliminary
identification
of
social-emotional
issues.
Parent
and
teacher
ratings
of
clinically
significant
depressive
symptoms,
coupled
with
teacher
ratings
in
the
clinically
significant
range
in
the
areas
of
hyperactivity,
attention,
and
aggression
led
to
the
administration
of
a
more
targeted
social
emotional
questionnaire,
the
Conners
3,
which
is
intended
to
identify
symptoms
often
present
in
individuals
with
attention
deficit
hyperactivity
disorder
(ADHD),
conduct
disorder
(CD),
and
oppositional
defiant
disorder
(ODD).
Results
from
the
BASC-2
and
Conners
3
ultimately
provided
the
team
with
valuable
insight
into
the
nature
of
the
students
difficulties
and
were
used
to
inform
recommendations
for
direct
intervention
and
increased
classroom
support.
disruptive
behaviors.
Miguel
now
rarely
completes
work,
will
wander
around
the
classroom
or
hallway
and
distracts
other
students
from
their
work.
Several
of
his
peers
have
begun
to
avoid
him
during
group
work,
likely
because
they
believe
he
will
get
them
in
trouble.
This
has
severely
hurt
Miguel,
increasing
his
feelings
of
depression
and
isolation.
Finally,
Ms.
Smith
noted
that
she
will
check
in
with
Miguel
every
morning
and
try
to
provide
him
with
positive
attention
as
much
as
possible
but
lately
he
has
been
disrespectful
or
unresponsive
during
these
interactions.
Classroom
Observations
Miguel
was
observed
in
his
classroom
during
the
late
morning.
The
class
had
just
ended
their
whole
group
lesson
and
was
transitioning
into
separate
activities
with
some
students
forming
small
groups
while
others
chose
to
work
independently.
Miguel
chose
a
seat
at
the
table
that
Ms.
Smith
utilizes
for
small
group
lessons.
She
told
him
that
she
was
about
to
begin
a
lesson
but
he
could
remain
at
the
table
if
he
continued
to
read
quietly.
About
two
minutes
into
the
group
lesson,
Miguel
interrupted
her
to
ask
a
question
about
the
calendar
that
was
displayed
on
the
wall
behind
her.
She
immediately
redirected
him
to
focus
on
his
reading
or
he
would
have
to
find
another
seat.
Miguel
returned
to
flipping
through
his
book
while
frequently
pausing
to
look
around
the
room
or
move
around
in
his
seat.
He
then
stood
up
and
began
to
wander
around
the
room,
stopping
to
chat
with
a
few
of
his
peers
for
about
one
minute
before
being
redirected
by
his
teacher
to
find
some
work
to
do.
Next,
he
sat
down
at
his
desk
in
front
of
the
chalkboard
and
began
playing
with
some
of
the
items
that
were
inside.
Testing
Observations
Miguel
was
tested
on
two
occasions,
first,
using
the
BASC-IISRP,
a
social-emotional
screener
that
requires
the
examinee
to
fill
out
a
series
of
questions
rating
their
perception
of
their
behavior
and
feelings
at
both
school
and
home.
He
was
subsequently
tested
using
the
Conners
3,
a
questionnaire
designed
to
obtain
a
students
observations
about
their
behavior
and
emotional
state
specifically
targeted
toward
the
identification
of
attention
deficit
hyperactivity
disorder
(ADHD),
conduct
disorder
(CD),
and
oppositional
defiant
disorder
(ODD).
Miguel
completed
both
screeners
individually
in
the
examiners
office.
On
both
occasions,
he
spent
a
lengthy
period
of
time
considering
many
of
the
questions
despite
instructions
from
the
examiner
to
answer
quickly,
and
was
observed
to
be
looking
out
the
window
or
around
the
room
multiple
times,
requiring
several
redirections
from
the
examiner.
Miguel
seemed
to
enjoy
spending
time
in
the
examiners
office
and
was
reluctant
to
return
to
his
classroom
following
completion
of
the
assessments.
Assessment
Results
Behavior
Assessment
System
for
Children-Second
Edition
(BASC-2)
The
BASC-2
is
a
norm-referenced
rating
scale
designed
to
help
identify
a
variety
of
emotional
and
behavioral
disorders
in
children.
The
BASC-2
gathers
information
from
parents,
teachers,
and
the
child.
The
instrument
includes
several
composite
and
scale
scores.
The
Behavioral
Symptoms
Index
(BSI),
or
overall
score,
measures
the
overall
level
of
behavioral
problems.
On
the
Clinical
Scales,
scores
from
41
to
59
are
considered
average,
and
about
two
out
of
three
children
have
scores
within
this
range.
Scores
from
60
to
69
are
considered
at-risk
and
areas
to
be
aware
of
and
monitor
(and
are
underlined).
Scores
of
70
and
above
are
considered
clinically
significant
and
likely
deserve
attention
and/or
further
follow
up
(and
are
printed
in
bold).
However,
on
the
Adaptive
Scales,
higher
scores
denote
more
positive
behaviors.
Scores
from
41-59
are
considered
average,
while
scores
of
31-40
are
considered
at-risk,
and
scores
of
30
and
below
are
considered
clinically
significant.
TEACHER
RATING
SCALES
(TRS)
Miguels
teacher,
Ms.
Smith,
completed
a
questionnaire
that
assesses
a
students
social-emotional
functioning
in
order
to
screen
for
potential
behavioral,
emotional,
or
adaptive
difficulties
present
at
school.
T-Score
Clinical
Scales
Hyperactivity
86
Aggression
81
Conduct
Problems
66
Externalizing
Problems
Composite
80
Anxiety
59
Depression
111
Somatization
69
Internalizing
Problems
Composite
87
Attention
Problems
72
Learning
Problems
60
School
Problems
Composite
67
Atypicality
76
Withdrawal
71
Behavioral
Symptoms
Index
91
Adaptive
Scales
Adaptability
29
Social
Skills
42
Leadership
39
Study
Skills
30
Functional
Communication
34
Adaptive
Skills
33
Depression
43
Sense
of
Inadequacy
53
Internalizing
Problems
Composite
51
Attention
Problems
62
Hyperactivity
58
Inattention/Hyperactivity
Composite
61
Emotional
Symptoms
Index
50
Adaptive
Scales
Relations
with
Parents
62
Interpersonal
Relations
47
Self-Esteem
53
Self-Reliance
47
Personal
Adjustment
Composite
53
The
Externalizing
Problems
Composite
(acting
out
behavior)
examines
the
areas
of
hyperactivity,
aggression,
and
conduct
problems.
The
hyperactivity
scale
measures
the
tendency
to
be
overly
active
or
act
without
thinking,
the
aggression
scale
measures
the
tendency
to
act
in
a
hostile
manner
that
may
appear
threatening
to
others,
and
the
conduct
problems
scale
measures
the
tendency
to
engage
in
anti-
social
rule-breaking
behavior.
Miguels
mother
and
teacher
reported
significant
concern
for
Miguel,
in
the
area
of
hyperactivity,
which
includes
not
being
able
to
wait
to
take
his
turn,
acting
without
thinking,
and
fiddling
with
things
at
meals,
etc.
Miguels
mother
and
teacher
also
reported
significant
concerns
in
the
areas
of
aggression,
such
as
arguing
when
denied
his
own
way,
defying
teachers,
and
annoying
others
on
purpose.
None
of
the
respondents
reported
concerns
for
conduct
problems
(e.g.
lying,
breaking
the
rules,
etc.).
The
Internalizing
Problems
Composite
(acting
in
behavior)
examines
the
areas
of
anxiety,
depression,
and
somatization.
The
anxiety
scale
measures
the
tendency
to
be
nervous
or
worried
about
real/imagined
problems,
the
depression
scale
measures
the
tendency
to
have
feelings
of
unhappiness
and
sadness
that
may
result
in
the
inability
to
carry
out
everyday
activities,
and
the
somatization
scale
examines
the
tendency
to
be
overly
sensitive
to
relatively
minor
physical
problems
or
discomforts.
Notably,
Miguels
mother
and
classroom
teacher
both
reported
significant
concerns
related
to
depression,
while
Miguel
reported
no
such
concerns.
None
of
the
respondents
reported
concerns
in
the
areas
of
anxiety
or
somatization.
The
School
Problems
Composite
examines
the
areas
of
attention
problems
and
learning
problems.
The
attention
problems
scale
measures
the
tendency
to
be
easily
distracted
and
the
inability
to
concentrate.
The
learning
problems
scale
measures
the
presence
of
academic
difficulties.
All
three
respondents
reported
significant
concern
for
Miguels
ability
to
pay
attention,
such
as
being
easily
distracted
from
class
work,
having
a
short
attention
span,
and
getting
in
trouble
for
not
paying
attention
during
class.
While
Miguels
classroom
teacher
did
not
report
concerns
for
learning
problems
that
were
at
an
at-risk
or
clinically
significant
level,
she
did
indicate
that
he
has
trouble
completing
tests
and
keeping
up
in
class.
There
are
two
scales,
which
do
not
contribute
to
a
composite,
atypicality
and
withdrawal.
The
atypicality
scale
examines
the
tendency
to
think
or
behave
in
an
odd
or
unusual
manner.
The
withdrawal
scale
examines
the
tendency
to
avoid
social
contact.
Within
the
atypicality
scale,
Ms.
Smith,
Miguels
classroom
teacher,
reported
at-risk
concerns,
however;
the
items
that
were
indicated
were
all
related
to
acting
confused
or
strangely,
two
behaviors
that
may
also
occur
in
students
who
struggle
to
maintain
focus
and
therefore
have
difficulty
following
the
directions
necessary
for
completing
work
or
knowing
when
to
start
or
finish
classroom
activities.
Neither
Miguel
nor
his
mother
reported
any
difficulties
regarding
atypicality.
On
the
withdrawal
scale,
Miguels
teacher
reported
clinically
significant
concerns,
including
playing
alone
and
having
difficulty
making
friends,
while
his
mother
did
not
report
having
these
concerns.
The
Behavioral
Symptoms
Index
is
a
global
measure
of
serious
problem
behaviors.
Miguels
teacher
noted
a
clinically
significant
level
of
behavior
problems
while
his
mother
indicated
an
elevated
level.
The
Adaptive
Skills
Composite
examines
pro-social,
desirable
behaviors,
including
adaptability,
social
skills,
leadership
skills,
study
skills,
functional
communication
skills,
and
activities
of
daily
living.
None
of
the
respondents
reported
any
concerns
in
these
areas.
Overall,
results
indicate
that
Miguel
is
having
significant
difficulty
with
maintaining
focus
both
in
the
classroom
as
well
as
at
home.
His
tendency
to
become
easily
distracted
as
well
his
inability
to
listen
attentively
to
adults
appears
to
be
negatively
affecting
his
academic
performance.
The
fact
that
both
Miguels
mother
and
teacher
reported
significant
external
depressive
symptoms
(e.g.
saying
I
hate
myself,
Nobody
likes
me)
while
Miguel
did
not
indicate
that
he
is
feeling
negative
internal
self-worth
(e.g.
feeling
like
nothing
is
going
right,
not
caring)
likely
warrants
further
assessment
to
elucidate
the
true
underlying
cause
of
his
social-emotional
issues.
A
recommendation
was
made
to
his
mother
for
further
assessment
utilizing
the
Conners
3,
a
questionnaire
specifically
targeted
toward
executive
functioning,
attention
and
hyperactivity
as
well
as
aggressive
and
defiant
behavior.
Conners
Rating
Scale
Third
Edition
(CRS-3)
The
Conners
3rd
Edition
is
a
questionnaire
designed
to
obtain
a
students
observations
about
their
behavior.
The
Conners
can
be
used
with
students
from
age
6
to
18
years.
It
is
designed
to
give
useful
information
about
a
students
ability
to
pay
attention/focus
and
ignore
distractions
in
different
environments
(both
at
home
and
at
school).
When
combined
with
other
information
the
results
of
the
Conners
can
support
assessment
decisions
and
can
be
a
useful
component
of
a
DSM-IV-TR-
based
ADHD
diagnosis.
Scores
are
represented
as
t
scores.
Scores
between
40
and
60
fall
in
the
average
range.
Scores
from
60
to
64
are
high
average.
Scores
from
65
to
69
are
elevated
scores.
Scores
over
70
represent
very
elevated
scores
and
significantly
different
behaviors.
The
Conners
provides
measures
of
five
main
areas
of
functioning:
Inattention,
Hyperactivity/Impulsivity,
Learning
Problems,
Defiance/Aggression
and
Peer
Relations.
The
Conners
also
measures
the
number
of
symptoms
commonly
associated
with
ADHD
predominantly
inattentive
type
and
ADHD
predominately
hyperactive-impulsive
type
as
well
as
conduct
disorder
(CD)
and
oppositional
defiant
disorder
(ODD).
Conners
Scale
Scores
Parent
Teacher
Self
Report
Scale
Scale
Inattention
79*
78*
55
Hyperactivity
/
impulsivity
90*
90*
55
Learning
problems
/
executive
-
58
-
functioning
Learning
problems
72*
43
55
Executive
functioning
77*
76*
-
Aggression
90*
90*
47
Peer
relations
55
90*
-
Family
relations
-
-
53
DSM
-IV
TR
Symptom
Scales
Scale
Parent
Teacher
Self
Report
Scale
Scale
ADHD
Predominantly
Inattentive
Type
83*
80*
55
ADHD
Predominantly
Hyperactive
90*
89*
51
impulsive
type
Conduct
Disorder
75*
83*
44
Oppositional
Defiant
Disorder
90*
90*
48
*
Elevated
Scores
DSM-IV-TR
Total
Symptom
Count
DSM-IV-TR
Symptom
DSM-IV-TR
Parent
Teacher
Self
Scale
Requirements
Report
ADHD
Predominantly
At
least
6
out
of
9
8*
9*
3
Inattentive
Type
symptoms
ADHD
Predominantly
At
least
6
out
of
9
9*
8*
0
Hyperactive
impulsive
symptoms
type
ADHD
Combined
Type
Criteria
must
be
met
for
Yes*
Yes*
No
both
ADHD
In
and
ADHD
Hyp-Imp
Conduct
Disorder
At
least
3
out
of
15
5*
3*
0
Oppositional
Defiant
Disorder
symptoms
At
least
4
out
of
8
symptoms
8*
8*
Results
of
the
Conners
3
reveal
broad
areas
of
agreement
between
Miguels
mother
and
teacher
in
the
categories
of
inattention,
hyperactivity/impulsivity,
executive
functioning,
and
aggression.
These
results
are
consistent
with
anecdotal
reports
provided
by
Ms.
Ruiz
and
Ms.
Smith
as
well
as
observations
by
the
school
psychologist
intern.
Miguels
self-reported
ratings
were
not
clinically
significant
in
any
category;
however,
these
results
must
be
interpreted
with
caution
as
both
his
mother
and
teacher
report
that
Miguel
has
expressed
awareness
of
feeling
depressed,
angry,
or
unable
to
focus
to
them
at
various
times
in
the
past.
Overall,
Miguels
difficulties
with
attention
and
focus,
feelings
of
depression
or
lack
of
self-
worth,
along
with
the,
more
recent,
appearance
of
defiant
and
aggressive
behavior
can
be
attributed
to
a
complex
mix
of
environmental
(e.g.
being
the
middle
child
in
a
busy
household,
having
the
freedom
of
movement
and
choice
inherent
to
the
Montessori
philosophy),
social
emotional
(e.g.
feeling
ignored
or
unwanted),
and
potentially
neurological
(e.g.
the
presence
of
symptoms
consistent
with
attention
deficit
hyperactivity
disorder
that
appear
present
across
multiple
settings)
factors.
In
the
educational
environment,
Miguel
is
likely
to
benefit
from
increased
support
and
positive
attention
from
his
teacher
as
well
as
the
school
psychologist
intern.
Recommendations
1)
To
assist
with
his
ability
to
maintain
attention
and
focus
in
the
classroom,
Miguel
would
likely
benefit
from:
a.
A
daily
work
plan
written
in
collaboration
with
his
teacher.
b.
A
designated
quiet
area
in
the
classroom,
absent
distractions.
c.
Frequent
check-ins
by
his
teacher
to
ensure
he
is
following
along
with
a
class
lesson,
understanding
directions,
or
adhering
to
his
work
plan.
2)
To
address
his
need
for
positive
attention
from
peers
and
adults,
Miguel
would
likely
benefit
from:
a.
Daily
check-ins
with
the
school
psychologist
intern.
b.
Participation
in
a
weekly
counseling
group,
facilitated
by
the
school
psychologist
intern,
comprised
of
similar
age
peers
and
designed
to
teach
strategies
for
impulse
control
and
emotion
regulation.
c.
Positive
rewards,
including
the
ability
to
help
out
in
a
primary
classroom.
_______________________________________
Andrew
Alberti
School
Psychologist
Intern
Katherine
Kozlowski,
Ph.D.,
NCSP
School
Psychologist
Summary
Statement
The two artifacts presented above illustrate my ability to: gather data on a
student
from
a
variety
of
sources;
compile
the
data
into
a
comprehensive
picture
of
their
present
levels
of
performance;
identify
areas
of
need
within
the
educational
environment;
select
current,
norm-referenced,
assessment
measures
which
are
culturally
and
linguistically
appropriate;
and
utilize
the
results
of
both
qualitative
and
quantitative
methods
of
inquiry
to
provide
a
holistic
view
of
a
childs
strengths
and
needs
that
can
used
to
inform
the
development
of
highly
effective
interventions
and
supports.
Throughout
the
course
of
my
internship
year,
I
believe
that
I
have
significantly
improved
my
ability
to
utilize
the
information
I
have
gathered
on
a
student
to
provide
an
all-inclusive,
as
opposed
to
compartmentalized,
view
of
their
present
level
of
functioning.
In the case of both Zoe and Miguel, I was able to successfully obtain a wealth
of
information
from
interviews
conducted
with
their
parents
and
teachers
as
well
as
my
own
behavioral
observations.
I
was
also
careful
to
choose
my
assessment
tools
only
after
consideration
of
relevant
cultural
and
linguistic
factors,
along
with
overall
aspects
of
test
validity.
Going
forward,
I
will
strive
to
conduct
observations
across
multiple
settings
whenever
possible.
Lastly,
the
on-going
debate
regarding
the
role
of
cognitive
testing
in
education,
at
times,
hindered
my
ability
to
acquire
a
complete
understanding
of
a
childs
mental
processes,
which
may
have
been
utilized
to
create
better-informed
interventions
and
supports.