Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
web site. There is also a way to email the sponsor specifically about this part of the site,
and the main U. S. Mint web page has other contact information as well.
Design/Usability
This web site was very easy to use. The games are easy to access and with broadband
everything loaded very quickly. The instructions were clear for the games and interactive
activities that I accessed. The colors are a little loud, but they are not busy, and the
graphics are themed and reasonable in number. While there is a contact email address
listed it is not hyperlinked; it would have to be cut and pasted into the users own email
account. There is also a help screen for frequently encountered problems, although the
site was so easy to use I encountered no difficulties.
Accessibility
Nearly this whole section of the web site is in color, so it might be difficult for those with
colorblindness or black and white displays, although I have neither of those problems and
would have a hard time verifying this. Despite the fact that it is very bright, mainly
primary colors, it is still fairly uncluttered and easy to navigate. When this site was run
through WebXACT it came up with the fewest accessibility errors of the three web sites,
it also had no broken links or outside advertisements. This web site also came up with no
first or third party cookies. The interactive activities and games might be difficult for
those with dial up because they can take a long time to load.
Accuracy or reliability
This web site is run by a U. S. government organization, and generally factual
information can be trusted from these sources. Also, the majority of the information
deals with history and currency so it is easily verified in any number of ways, other
internet sites, library, encyclopedias, or general knowledge. The site also clearly claims
that it is run and updated by the U. S. Mint, and includes an email address to contact with
questions, or when encountering errors. Finally, I admit I am no history expert; but I did
not notice any obvious errors.
Objectivity
This site is run by the U. S. government. I would say that it was created to both inform
and promote U. S. currency. The reason that I believe the site is trying to promote
possibly more than just currency awareness is because there is a section of the kids and
educators site that is for coin collecting. This seems to be encouraging the buying and
collecting of U. S. currency. However, other than its obvious bid to interest kids in
currency I could not find any other bias. All of the graphics are animals, the colors are
mostly primary, and the dialogue discuses different gender and racial communities as
allowed by historical events.
This site had a very nice understated color scheme with very few graphics. The links are
also orderly and well labeled in appearance. There is very limited outside advertising on
things that would interest educators and students, but they went well with the site and
were not distracting. This site does have search abilities; however I did not find them to
work nearly as well as some of the other sites I looked at. More often then not the search
term failed to bring back any search results; however, this could just be a testament to the
limited amount of material on the site.
Accessibility
As I stated earlier I liked the color scheme best on this web site, however as it is largely
white, grey and light blue I have a feeling that might affect the appearance to someone
who was using a monitor that only displayed in black and white. This site made good use
of captions and visual clues for the interactive activities; I like this because it helps to
reinforce learning by providing both audio and visual information. When I ran this site
through WebXACT it came back with three broken links, which I though was probably
generous, considering that I found two on one random lesson plan. Also, Discovery
Education was the best, by far, with providing contact information for users wishing to
contact the organization.
Accuracy or reliability
This site appears to deal in well known facts, and does not include a lot of opinion or
breaking news; even the section on current affairs was on topics as far back as 35 to 40
years. The information included in this site would be easily verified by outside sources.
It appears fairly objective as it deals largely with well know facts, and none of the topics I
looked at seemed particularly weighted in one way or another. All of the lesson plans are
credited to their creators. I also randomly chose a lesson plan and checked all the links
on it, two of the six no longer worked. This might be discouraging for teachers that were
looking for additional content to add to the lesson plan.
Objectivity
It seems that Discovery Education was built for the sole purpose of helping teachers with
things like find lesson plans or activities, create word searches, look for graphics, and
many other useful aspects. However, having said this there is also a lot of advertisement
for their products and information on their shows which I am sure they are promoting
teachers use. This is also a commercial web site as it is sponsored by the Discovery
Channel. I could not detect any bias in the many topics that I checked on this web site; it
deals largely with well know facts that would be easy to double check.
Design/Usability:
There are many wonderful design features for this web site, not the least of which is the
search function. The search function works great, and when having to sift through this
much information it is an invaluable asset. However, the web site does look busy. Much
of it is black, white, and red, but the way that the links and information have been put on
the site just seems a little jumbled together. I think this is because the users view consists
of so many visual subjects; there are at least two to three advertisements, most of them
for The History Channel products, and then start up shots of several of the video clips. I
had no problem using this web site with a broadband connection, but I would imagine
something with this much video could take a while on a dial up.
Accessibility
As I discussed earlier it is not the surfeit of color that mar the view of The History
Channel web site, it is that there are too many full color pictures of different topic in the
users view. It is very distracting and visually over stimulating. There are captions and in
some cases transcripts for video presentations, which is very helpful because it is not
always clear by the picture what the content of the video is. The site also has a contact
email address that can be used to notify the web site administrator of broken links or
errors.
Accuracy or reliability
The History Channel web site mainly deals with historical information; this is something
that is easily verified for accuracy using a plethora of outside sources. The parent
company is clearly stated at the bottom of each page, as is the copyright. There is even a
section to help users cite the information that they find on the web site, with many
examples. I didn't have any problems with accessing any of the information I was
looking for, and WebXACT turned up no broken links when I checked
Objectivity
The History Channel web site was created, in my opinion, to educated internet users on
the network shows past, present, and future as well as the merchandise offered by this
station. This is because it is a commercial web site and it is there to promote A&E and
The History Channel. If this site were trying to convince its user of anything it would be
to watch The History Channel and buy their merchandise. The content on the web site is
largely historical, and I saw a well rounded representation of gender and race in the
shows offered, so it would be hard to argue that the site was biased in some way.