Mages, editors
Unlocking
the
Groove
Rhythm, Meter, and
Musical Design
in Electronic Dance Music
Mark J. Butler
Indiana University Press | Bloomington and IndianapolisCONTENTS
‘eknowledgments
Part |: Getting into the Groove:
Approaching the Study of Electronic Dance Music
Introduction
1 The History and Creation of
Electronic Dance Music
1g Rhythm and Meter
in Electronic Dance Music
2 Conceptu
and Interpretive Mul
3 Ambiguity
4 Metrical Dissonance
Part Ill Electronic Dance Music and the Epic
5 Multimeasure Patterning
6 Form from the Record to the Set
Afterword: Unlocking the Groove
32
8
7
am
138
.”
179
202
255certain shared musical characte
ist section of this chapt
ter outlining these practices and charac-
traces their emergence in the years
preceding EDM's tise and in the first decade of its development. | then turn
toward an exploration of the diverse creative roles and technologies involved in
| realizing EDM as music, with particular attention to the activities ofthe DJ, the
producer, and the dancer.
the most distinctive characteristics of electronic dance music Is the
way iny produced—namely, through the use of electronic technologies
such as synthesizers, drum machines, sequencers, and samplers. Although in-
ar, these technologies
EDM, In which a tra
The History and
Creation of Electronic
Dance Music
‘tional instrument or alive vocal isthe exception rat
performance is esse
- with studio production it is always technolagically medi
technologies in performance contexts are turntables, headphones, twelveinch
| records, and a mixing board, and the most familiar live performer is the DI
jockey). The tradition of Diing practiced in EDM involves more than simply
playing other people's record; rather,
different parts of records into new compositions that di
‘their source materials. In general, the exact course of a Di's performance is not
predetermined, instead developing according to the demands of a specific situa-
tion, through interaction with a dancing audience. Although the D) has always
| been the most important figure in bringing musi to fans throughout the history
ofthis: mu has become increasingly common for
producers to perform as well, esp
= they manipulate studio technology in
Electronic dance music originated in the United States and first became
Techno is a music based in experimentation;
It is sacred to no one race; it has no definitive sound.
the future of the human race.
2, no vision.
ted. The most pervasive
Techno has brought people of
Together under ane r
Isn't it obvious that m
1¢ keys to the universe?
animals and tribal humans
‘ousands of years!
f the underground
nes and frequencies
No matter how so called primitive their equipment may be
Transmit these tones and wreak havoc on the programmers!
Underground Resistance, excerpt from “Creed”
Electronic Dance Music and Its Histories
‘The term “electronic dance music” encompasses a broad range of music produced
ding the last two decades, including genres such as techno, house, drum
bass, and tran: he differences between
these types of musi them as belonging to the seme overa
category, defined by particular practices of production and consumption and by
‘rom Ding sons 3c
1, ttpslworncundergroundresistance.com, cited 4 traction that challenges this distinction in a rultnude of ways.
The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 33fans who only hear the music in clubs and raves at the other, most fans pur
‘these experiences on a faily regul
ing creates a lexicon of physical memories that carry over into nondance contexts,
Even when genres depart from direct connections to dance, they do so in ways
‘that demonstrate their relatedness to dance-floor traditions: some music draws
‘on the conventions of EDM, but manipulates them so much that the results are
fo longer suitable for the dance floar,* while other genres are written expressly
‘ot not dancing
‘Aithough humans have undoubtedly been using their bodies to interpret
music was made, electroni¢ dance music is built around the
The technologies that
male ths acy pss bags to deep ding the late rneteenth ety,
when Thomas Edison invented the phonograph (1877). Ten years late
Berner created the gramophone, which used flat discs instead of Edison's cy
inders (Brewster and Broughton 2000: 20), By the tirn of the century, these
devices were affordable enough to be widely accessible (Chanan 1995: 27-28),
but dancing was still very much linked with live music. This association started
sme prevalent
widely popular in the United Kingdom. Today, however, i is appreciated through
out the industrialized world—not
as diverse as Argentina, Austral
though the styles created and enjoyed can vary considera
another, certain musical characteristics are shared among almost all EDM. in
general it has a steady, relatively fast tempo—mostly in the range of 120-150
beats per minute (BPM), although certain genres regularly reach speeds of 180,
BPM. Except in certain ambient genres, 2 repeating bass drum pattem is almost
always present, And final
other vocal sound, to @
| manipulation$ Thi
straction I describe in the introduction (p. 11)—sistinguishes EDM from almost
all other commercial popular music produced in America and Europe since the
birth of rock ‘n’
Although purely instrumental music has often been portrayed as “absolute,”
a refusing to articulate any meaning beyond its own patterning, listeners deal
With the apparent abstraction of EDM by grounding it in the physical motions of
dance.’ This relationship to interpretive movement is one of its key defining
features. Producers create music with the expectation that it will be played on
the floor, where the crowd's response will determine its success or failure. Dis
plan and shape their performances around this response, a major portion of which
t due to the humanizng influence of the DJ." According to
Brewster and Broughton, the first documented occurrence of a DJ playing in
public took place in 1943 in Otley, West Yorkshire, in the United Kingdom, The
These ae informal comments base on my own expaincs. | have met fans Gome of whom
ary ove w dibs td ees} wie mate Stoners su a
5 the who have stopped going cing but cornu 20 follow the music
ready eat but with an affect that too ler key forthe
le boat patter characteristic of EDM and manipulate
eed 701: 63. Ths pha nec a nie St ae
mes the term “dectonica” has ao
rele wo a singe EDM corpouson Bt
wel One potential area of conn
sereties also alle "tacks." (Kens 2000 uses this sense of “a
this is also the typeof tack referenced by the term “muitreck recog.”
this wage Is mre spec to produ
‘hose werk often moves rvediated dance music events in terms
ually of the
a5 Moby and Fatboy Si
7, See Butler 200 for further ccuson of dance ata resonse to EDs eavact quai tre wit eg on disene betwen “le” an acd” use
34 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE ‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 35spread to London and America and began to develop some ofthe characteristics
associated with modern nightclubs. No longer just 2 place where one heard
recorded music, the discothéque became a special environment, distinguished by
lights and a powerful sound system, which one attended for the expressed pur-
pose of dancing. The DJ was now a central figure within the disco experience,
the person who made recorded music immedi
Styles of dance also changed in signficant ways during the 1960s, Dancing
had previously been an activity for couples, involving specific steps, With the
advent of the Twist (1960) and the series of dance crazes that followed, move-
ment became an individual phenomenon, requiing no training or choreography.
Signiticantiy, this allowed women to dance independenty: at the same time,
because dancers were no longer focused solely on their partners, it shifted at-
‘ention onto the communal experience of the dance floor as a whole (Brewster
‘and Broughton 2000: 54-5 experience would
become essential to gay liberation during the 197
social upheaval ofthe acid house movement in the United Kingdom during the
late 1980s,
AAthough the term “discothéque" became widespread in the 1960s, it was
not until the 70s that a style of music called disco developed. In the early years
is decade, Dis played a mixture of funk and soul at New York clubs such
as the Sanctuary, the Loft, the Haven, and the Gallery, where the ma} he
dancers were African American and gay. For several years the scene was a largely
underground phenomenon, but between 1973 and 1976 it began to pick up
steam, resulting in some 150-200 clubs in New York by the mid-1970s (Brewster
‘and Broughton 2000: 155). At this point, narratives of cisco's development beg
to paint 2 picture of authenticity corrupted: as disco increased in popt
came to the attention of record company executives who setzed upon it as a
way of comper ing rock sales, and between 1976 and 1979 the
record-buying public was bombarded with a deluge of disco releases. Long-
Jenscher QOO0: 22 and 35) refs to the
x couples, an expectation hat was often
36 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
form 5 opened all over the country,
{and heterosexualized) it
saturated, and crashed
of dence music in general) even today. The event that seems to
antidisco backlash most effectively {it is mentioned in almost every account of
disco's demise) occurred in Chicago on July 12, 1979. Radio DJ Steve Dahl, who.
had described isco as a “tlsease," held a promotional event called a “disco
between games, an event that aroused the fervor of the ciond so
‘mach that a riot ensued and the second game had to be called off (Brewster
‘and Broughton 2000: 268-68). As quickly as it had entered the mainstream,
and dance music returned to the underground.”
The disco era is sgificnt for today’s electronic dance music in several ways.
Fist it was during this era that the idea of spending an evening dancin
popularized actoss the world, Furthermore, most of the pr
creation associated with today’s electronic dance music came
this time. t became commonplace for Dis to mix and overlap records
410 produce a continuous flow of sound, rather than allowing a record to die
down before moving on tothe next one.« They also would switch back and forth
between tivo copies of the same record in order to extend it, as most records
issued during the first part of the decade were very short, having been released
according to pop-song standards. Other important DJ techniques developed dur-
explain in detal this chapter, included beat
beats of two records), and the slip-cue (Brewster
‘and Broughton 2000: 136-37)
Like almost every style of dance music to come after i, disco frst developed
‘on the dancefloor, with studio production following aftr. Inthe early years, the
records Dis played were mostly funk and soul; specifically "disco" records did
16, Acoring to Bre
Nel wo spun a the New York scothque Bhar ding he 1960s.
‘he fist DI to mi records was Tey
The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 37Synthesizers were used as but they were not the predominant form of
instrumentation Furthermo
others, and because they combined records in unique ways, they created a dis-
tinctive “sound,” which was event
ated song and record formats aimed sp
remixes and twelve-inch singles. The two phenomena arose around the same
time and in conjunction with each other. The fist person to remix disco singles
‘was Tom Moulton, who would take tapes of songs, cut them up, and rearrange
them so that the most danceable parts were extended.”” At the time singles
‘were still released on seven-nch records, which were meant ta be pl
use this format could only
x which often in the lenath of a song quite
because the sever-inch format forced the grooves
could achieve was lower and the overall sound
3ftwelve-inch 33s, Producers discovered thatthe larger
tan entire remix or extended dance version of a song
‘onto one sie of a record and to achleve a richer, more resonant sound (especially
in the bass, the register that affects dancers most physically), and record com-
began to utilize the format. The fst commercially successful
' remix of Double Exposure’s “Ten
in June 1976 (Brewster and Broughton
remixes are stil widespread in dance
the format of choice.
Nevertheless, disco differed in many ways fom the electronic dance musk
of the ‘80s and ‘90s, First of al, though it has often been characterized as “art
jal,” its production was not, by and large, electronic. Most disco records
in record company studios with session musicians; even the most comme
leases lst an array of performers on instruments such as drums
iythm guitar, grand piano, and miscellaneous percussion.
; it was pre-
_-setved and developed further within the communities with which it was originally
‘associated. In clubs such as the Paradise Garage in New York City and the
Warehouse In Chicago, Dis blended disco with other styles to create new vari-
ons on its sound, They also made use of new technologies to create dance
hat was truly “electronic.”
dary DJ wha played at the club until it closed in 1987. The style of music that
7 favored has since come to be called “garage,” after the name ofthe club itself.
‘ough Levan's selections were by al accounts eciectc, "
‘the same time, garage did make use of the new technologies a
‘te early 1980s, For instance, the New York City Peech Boys’ "Do
re
‘eik of producer such 25 Glarle Moroder and Fak Cowie, whose
FG," 2 genre popular i gay cbs thoughout much of the 1960s.
on ecstatic vorals—a dase Moroder produced tack was Donra Summa’:
17, Brewster end Sroughon 2000 175-76, The authors point out that, sic spe
Since wks witha sgl econ of an
(rs Fame EDM in which the orginal multack
‘of manipulation. Brewster and Broughton dene explain when the lates techrique became
38 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE ‘The History and Creation of Electronic Danco Music 39vocals, guitar, and piano but
drum machine in place of a
‘At the Warehouse in Cl
so features 2 variety of studio effects and a Linn
drummer (Fikentscher 2000: 99).
190, another Di-drven scene made even of
elements of disco. When the
a friend of Lary Levan, moved
years of the club, Knuckles
i disco and garage, as well a a largely electronic form
of disco coming mainly from ttaly? As disco ceased to be commercially viabl
he found himself short on releases, and so he began remixing tracks at home.
He would work the results into his DJ performances with a reel-to-reel tape
player. Eventually, he began to add elements to his mixes such as newly com-
posed bass lines and drum tracks, AS his style became more distinctive, it ac-
quired a name: house music. AS with garage, the term comes from the place
‘where the music developed.
Although electronic music technology began to be popularized in the 1970s,
ly expensive, cumbersome, and dificult to use during that
ative years of house music, however, this situation began
particular, the TB-303 bass fine generator and the TR-808 and TR-209 drum
significantly more affordable and accessible, Musi
instead, they could
machines—made product
cians no longer needed to gain access to recording stud
‘own equipment and create music ath
‘mances, using the 808's resonant bass drum sound to intensify the beat of the
record being played and to create transitions between records (Brewster and
Broughton 2000: 307; Sh leases in the house
i") and 1984 (Jamie
by 1985, the trickle had become a flood.
House reveals Its disco roots in the gospel style ofits vocals and the funk
of its basslines. At the same time, its creators cleary found something attractive
aesthetic of drum machines and synthesizers. Hence
possible to speak of two streams of house—two related styles that coexist an
, and yet are identfiably distinct. On the one hand, there is “vocal”
ike garage—weats its disco ancestry on its sleeve. Vocal
23, This sve i sometimes called “le dco" se, for example Sicko 1998: 45-48.
26, reyetr and eroughtonghe 1984 as the Gate of thie weave (2000; 306), but Shapiro
2000p. 75) and Rietveld 1998, fas 1983
355)
40. GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
tation (unlike that of disc
swing-quantized rhythms to create a more “natu
another style of house music, predominantly instrumental
advantage. These compositions are
| eschewing not only sung melodies but also instru-
mental ones. Because drum-machine rhythms form thelr primary component, they
are often called “drum tracks hm tracks," or “tracks” for short; along
works having these qu sometimes described as "tracky.”
‘Although this distinction between “songs” and “tracks” dates back to the mid:
1980s, house musicians and fans sil use these categories today."
Around the same time that house was first created in Chicago, a somewhat
predominantly homosexual one. in spite of these
cians of the two cities have interacted wth each other
beginning and continue to do so.
Techno developed within a scene that involved a great deal of musical coss-
i igh school kids in north:
9 thelr own dance
parties (Sicko 1999: 32-33). Attendance was usually atleast several hundred
people, and sometimes reached as high as 1200 (Sicko 1999: 37), These were
Died events where a wide range of music was played. Favorite styles included
an assortment of electronic music, such as the highly synthesized disco stil comn-
from Europe at the time, New Wave bands such as the Human League and
Yellow Magic Orchestra, and technopop groups such as ABC (Sicko 1999: 44~
Radio also played an important role in techno's development. Especially
significant during the erly years was the “Midnight Funk Assocation,” a show
hosted by Charles Johnson, whose on-air name was “the Elect
Johnson, whose show was on the alt from 1977 to 1985, played a mixture of
25. tf yt s “quantized is quanttatvly precise. Orum-machine éytims alest a
ays have this quay, sine they are sully programmed rather than pesome
he human ef of “50ng”
25, See Shapito 2000 77-78 fora cea dscson of thi
‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 41New Wave and futuristic funk: signifcently, he also gave heavy rotation to the
German band Kraftwerk, who have often been cited as important precursors to
techno.
Listening to this radio show, and attending these partie, were three young
men in the western suburb of Belleile named Juan Atkins, Derick May, and
Kevin Saunderson. Atkins, May, and Saunderson—now nicknamed the
three recorded independently, they wer
kins was the fist to release records, although his
a rock context, In 1981, he formed a band called Cybotron with ou
(*RIK") Davis. Their inital release, “Alleys of Your Mind,” was an early example
of what might be called “proto-techno."® Both Atkins and Davis were very
‘questions of technology and the future, and they spent significant
amounts of time discussing these matters from a philosophical perspective and
reading works such as Alvin Toffie’s 1980 book The Third Wave (Sicko 1998:
70), These themes are reflected
inthe name Cybotron (a merger of "cyborg" and “cyclotron” [
in their lyrics, and the technological focus of thelr instrumentation
they released an album, Enter (reissued under the
broke up shorty thereafter because Davis wanted to pursue a more rock-based
approach,
In 1985, Atkins decided to skirt the music industry altogether and produce
277. A charac example of “futisic fnk* would be Palsments “Fashlih,” which
r
was theft song fo fatten syesnt bas ne Sh
“sintcant ole in early techno peaducéon. He has not been emphasized at an originator
ft. however, perhaps beceuse he released fone records than the “Bl
(Bar 2000; 126.
30. The firs grote
by Auber of Names:
i sla pop sng in fo
42 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
records on his own, an approach that has been characteristic of techno ever
nce, He began recording tracks independently and formed hhis own label (Me-
plex) to release them. His first single, released under the name Model 500,
hythms standing out as ts most prominent featur. tn fact, with
f the bass line, it contains litte in the way of melody or pi
no traces of versefchorus structure, and the only words in the track, which do
rot eppear for nearly two minutes, are rhythmically chanted rather than sung
{and often heavily manipulated), In a reversal of conventional associations, Atkins
Why is no head held high?
Maybe youl see them fy"
Not lang after the release of "No UFOs,” Kevin Saunderson formed his own
record label, KMS records. In the coming years, he would issue releases under
names as diverse as Reese, Reese and Santonio, Reese Project, Keynotes, Tronik
House, Inner City, Inter City, and € Dancer In 1986, Eddie Fowlkes released
Goodbye Kiss,
Aythim is Rythim?
During these early years, the scenes in Detroit and Chicago were relatively
isolated phenomena—confined to their respective cites, and largely underground
today, producers Fequnty use mule alass for ther various poets,
ed "yt fs Rhy"; for nstance, se Sco 1999. have
eed the selng given on the 1997 release Fanvato,
The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 43in import record stores and began to play them in the clubs where they worked
jetveld 1998: 40-45). The music increased in popularity during 1987, while
around the same time certain Dis and promoters began to foster a new approach
to clubbing. Figures such as Paul Oakenfold and Danny Rampling had been trens-
formed by th riences in clubs on the resort island of ibiza, where they
had danced until dawn and experimented with the drug Ecstasy. Oakenfold,
1, and others began to recreate these everts at clubs in London (Reynolds
began to spring up in ilegal locations such as warehouses and
‘the combination of house music and raving exploded in popul
in atime that has been dubbed the “second summer of love
had become a mass-cultural phenomenon among Britsh youth.
19905, US. promaters who had heard about English raves start
events in cities such as New York, Los Angeles, and San
Francisco. The phenomenon spread quickly, and raverike events now occur
‘across the country—net onl in major metropolitan areas, but also in the Arizona
esert,
the term
longer use the term,
Stead descrising events 2s "partes
ht dence party. In contrast to news portrayals,
comtemporary raves are defined neither by illegality nor by drug use. As @ phe-
hnomenon, the “rave” is just one part of the history of electronic dance musi
and one of many environments in which EDM now occurs in America and the
rest ofthe world? Although media accounts have tended to collapse al
contexts into one (thus the frequent use of nonsensical
terms such as "rave club y of "scenes," all of
ntact was ding that
44 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
‘which feature diferent crows different practices and behaviors, efferent values,
and different musical styles.
‘The first genre of American dance music to become popular in the United
Kingdom was Chicago house, Although music from Detrat was soon imported
reated as subcategory of house, and for many years the
: h term for electronic dance music in general was “house”
or “acid house.” Despite the social and musical differences ofthe two ciies—
‘hich are less than three hundred miles apart—it was dear that the two styles
‘were related. During the formative years of techno and house, the musicians
in various ways. The Three often visited Chicago to
‘their music, and Derrick May lived there for nearly a year around 1984
(Brewster and Broughton 2000: 320, 329).” In fac, he even sold Frankie Knuckles
2 TR-909 drum machine at one point (Shapiro 2000: 116).
‘and record companies became more aware of the
| distincion between the two cities’ musical styles, they began to emphasize the
Detioit style as a separate genre. Part of this process was the newfound use of
| techno" as a term. This development seems to have been driven in part by
| marketing forces. in 1988, Neil Rushton issued a compilation of Detroit mat
entitled The House Sound of Detroit. Wishing to emphasize his product
name to Techno! The New Dance Sound of Detroft. The mi
important part in this process as well, though: they had
“techno” as an adecive and Atkins recorded a treck called “Techno Music" for
the compilation Brewster and Broughton 2000: 331-32).
36, Acid house
‘fom the Roland 16-303
‘oe functioned as 2
“beter on. 6, Sick pa me reduces frm
= May and Marshall Jelfesen os exareles) objected strongly to
| deugtaking he decrbes the Dati achno scene inthe 18605 as almost ently dupe end
bioibtes this condton In part fo the scourge ofthe cortenporencus crack epider (Sicko 1999:
‘The History and Creation of Electronic Danco Music 45,"house music” is sometimes used to refer quite specifically
term for
to Chicago house and its offshoots and at other times as a catch
1) in the coinage of curious terms such
as “gobber house” [p.4] and “techno house” Ip. 84 to refer to specific sub-
genres). Dan Sicko generally uses “techno” as a term for a particular Detoit-
based genre, but a broader sense of the term comes into play when he applies
it to artists such as the Chemical Brothers end Bj iaims
that “UDM is essentially @ post-1970s, post-disco phenomenon, based in New
York" (2000: 6). And many scholarly sources coming from the United Kingdom
(eg. Pini 2001) tend to speak quite broadly about “rave.”
‘More broadly, these tensions call into question the unity that characterizes
ial narratives of EDM. As the account | have provided reflects the
information provided in curently avallable sources, itis also characterized by this
unity. Nor do | have sufficient space in which to offer an altemative account,
having chosen to focus primarily on music rather than history. However, | would
like to suggest that future works that do focus on the bstrical dimensions of
EDM might concentrate more on the dynamic forces that have shaped its deve
opment and less on individual figures.
This comment also raises questions about how gender might have shaped
narratives of EDMYs development. Existing accounts tend to emphasize the crea-
tivity ofa few individuals, and they often include elements of heroic struggle a5
stacles to be overcome, and technology to be conquered. These emphases
are evident not only inthe actual accounts, but also in the tiles that fr
(eqg., Techno Rebels: The Renegades of Electronic Funk (Sicko
most
Although this
writing on Detroit techno,
ns of disco, garage,
gay subcutures, we might consider what other types of stories
might be possible as we move toward increasingly precise ies of EDM.
The account | have provided focuses on the first genres of electronic dance
music to develop: garage, house, and techno, which are still considered foun
dational genres today. In the interest of space, | will nat trace th
beyond the 1980s, though | will remark briefy upon the considerable div
cation that occured within EDM during the 1990s, One of the mo
developments of the decade was jungle/drum ‘n’ bass, a gente that combines
accelerated drum patterns ("breakbeats”) sampled from the percussion-only sec
4 GETTING:INTO THE GROOVE
tions ("breaks") of old funk records with alf-tempo bass lines influenced by
teggae* More generally, electronic dance music since the 1990s has been char-
acterized by a dramatic increase in the number of genres under its fold and the
terms used to describe them." By the tum of the century, gente labels in use
luded trance, progressive house, nu-NRG, deep house, tec-house, minimal
techno, gltch-hop, IDM, two-step, happy hardcore, big beat, funky brea
and breakbeat—to name just a few. To describe the complex interaction of
‘musical and social processes that led to the development of each of these genres
‘would take us far afield, though 1 will offer a broad system for characterizing
volved in creating electronic dance music.
The Creation of Electronic Dance Music
MODES OF CREATIVE INTERACTION.
The many styles of electronic dance music, while sonically quite diverse, share a
‘common set of approaches to musical creation. In the following section, | explain
ing three key modes of
ion with EDM: that of the recording artist, that of the performing artist,
and that of the performing audience, Most commonly, the recording artist isthe
producer, although remixers can serve in this capacity as well. The prototypical
reducers also perform live, And
‘ough dance. | begin my dscus-
sion of these functions with a brie overview of the roles of producer and Dl,
and then tum to a more in-depth treatment of all the roles I have mentioned. 1
um Bas” wes
in theory, MeL20d doesnot
proj of youth
styles” (racy 1993:
The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 47explain the principal musical activities involved os well as the technologies
‘through which they are mediated. In this way the reader can begin the detailed
musical discussion of the following chapters with a clear sense of how this music
In any given performance situation, the functions of recording artist, pe
forming artist, and audience are distinct Each record that the DJ plays was made
by a particule person or group of persons (the producer or produces), and the
le performing, Within the broader social
dividuals to occupy multiple roles.
Many Dis also do production work (especially remixing), for instance, and! many
producers perform as Dis. The dynamics of the electronic dance music industry
encourage this interaction: producers who perfor a5 DJs gain opportunities to
ic, while Dis who experiment with production have a ready-made
cv recordings). The skills required forthe two crafts
producers must make records that work on the dance fl
2 thorough understanding of how such records are made.*
Furthermore, a considerable percentage of the audience at a given EDM
have some experience with Dling or production. Some may be "bed-
room Dis," who never play in public, or producers who create music solely for
thelr own enjoyment. Others may be amateur performers who play for free (or
for very litle) at local and regional events. Semiprofessional or aspiring profes-
si hese artists have begun to es-
tablish a reputation outside oftheir immediate environment and to make money
{rom their EDM activities, although they usually maintain some other job to make
fends meet. Such @ high degree of participation in music-making is posible for
a variety of reasons. First, one can be a producer or @ DJ on one's own; there
is no need to form a band, organize rehearsals, or gain access to music-industry
recording studios. Second, the technology req
though professionals might have more pieces of equipment,
be costly enough to be beyond the reach of amateurs, cheep forms of studio and
D1 technology are widely availa ; the abstraction
‘of EDM may make Dling and produ
of g
rand Dis must have
48 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
body. However, these observations stem from my feld research in Indiana;
locations with larger clubbing crowds, it may be less common for audiences
to contain large numbers of Dis and produces.
Of the roles | have outlined, the one that conforms most cosely to conven-
tional notions of a musical creator is that of the producer. The meaning of this
ten in electronic dance music difers somewhat from its connotations in the
majority of contemporary popular music, were it generally refers to someone
who oversees the process of recording in a stucio. Whereas this type of producer
‘an have a significant impact on the sound of a recording, sihe is not generally
‘thought of as a songwriter. In most EDM, however, technology is integrated
directy Into the act of composition, and the person who creates music usualy
records it as well. Hence, although | have chosen the term “recording artist” as
the clearest expression of what the producer does, the distinctions between pr.
ducer, songuriter, and recording artist begin to break dow
EDM producer embodies a
ina quit traditional
fer the term used within the culture for atleast two reasons:
leaves out the element of recording, essential to
row explain
‘The DJ plays an exceptionally significant part in controlling the sound of
electronic dance music. Much more than a person who simply plays records, the
EDM DJ functions as an intermediary between the producer and the audience,
the person who makes technologically mediated music immediate, DJs
the records producers have made, choose certain ones of them, and
them in a particular order to create a single continuous performance {a “set")
‘of an hour or more in length, A set's @ unity: not only do Dis create an unbroken
low of sound, they also minimize the distinctions between individual tracks, so
‘thatthe emphasis ison the larger whole rather than its components, Furthermor
‘the Di's arrangements within the set are intentionally novel; one of the primary
‘goals of Diing isto create something new ftom diverse sources. To this end, Dis
‘combine tracks in unexpected ways; they layer parts of tracks on top of parts of
‘other tracks (for instance, the bass line of one record with a single measure of
another reco ): and they create collage-tke pastiches by cutting back
and forth between records. They also alter individual tracks, often considerably.
42, Asa veal, the person cetingelecronic dence music has much more det contol oer
led i production thn 2 typlal popstar. Although EDM seems to vave
mediation is use of technology is very “hands
‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 49art ofthis study tree of the
Shiva, Mystik, and Viren
Swift), all of whom are quoted herein. Third, I will often be speaking of Dis in
__ @ general manner, and | wish to avoid using the defining power of language to
suggest that “the sense is male. Hence | wi
gendered pronouns Dl; when pronouns are necessary, I will use
*sthe" (to be read “she or he") or “his and her."
2 compositional act—both root
componere ("to put together”) and in a broader, more modern sense—even
though Dis do not create music “from scratch."#
Lest | overemphasize this compositional side, | hasten to point out that
programming, or track select This involves
playing the right music at
is still compositional in focus, the former emphasizes the DJ's role as a sort of
‘iberconnoisseur—a person who chooses just the right entrée from the musical
menu, In this capacity, the DJ might, for example,
that much of the audience would recognize—by a wel
point in the evening. In general, accounts of earlier types of (electronic) dance
music emphasize programming over composition. Writes attempting to capture
the ecstasy ofthe disco dancefloor
describe the joy o a pe
ming was ceatly a major emphasis
as Fkentscher’s (2000) account reveals. Since the 1990s, the compositional side
of Ding has become mare prominent. and it has become much less common to
hear et. However, programming is
emphasized to a considerable degree within certain genres
Before | turn to a more detailed discussion of the musical figures | have
presented, some words about the people who embody these roles are in ore,
As in many other music-cultures, those with primaty control over the creation of
electronic dance music (including both Dis and producers) are predominantly
male. This fact rises a number of questions for authors writing about EDM. One
practical concern involves the manner in which the DJ is referenced. Several
studies (eg, Brewster and Broughton 2000, Fikentscher 2000), after noting that
‘most Dis are male, explain that they will always use male pronouns to refer to
“him.” | find this approach problematic for several reasons. Fist, the number of
female Dis and producers has increased
‘women are stil the minority in both professions. Its no longer true, as Brewster
‘and Broughton balily assert (2000: x), that “98 percent of DJs have a penis."*
considered whether EDM cultures might be empowering and liberating or whether
they perpetuate sexist power structures, as well as how and why they might be
rating for particular groups of people (women and sexual minorities). As |
in this chapter, however, we might also consid
| played by gender in accounts of EDM's creation and development, as
host of other questions: How are constructions of gender different or
among the vai
‘0 do more than raise these questions, | wish 10 bring them up not only as
but also to indicate that more is at stake
is make music with an array of technology. Although the exact features and
nds of their equipment may vary, certain components are common to almost
J setups—namely, a pair of headphones, two tumtables, and a mixing board
‘et “mixer"). The mixing board, a simplified version of the equipment used in
‘5. Scholarly descriptions of popular musi aten depict its "best as masculine fis peristent
scouse, the Al Musle Gude notes thet “whet td [al
vas her empha on rhyter—in
all kroun, Dis do rate musi om scratching recor, producing cael
eno varios in pitch. Scratching i parvasve I many tunble-basea ses, but ratespeciy
enn in mast EDK
48, Fox fre
50 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE ‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 51‘Example 1.1. Technics SL-1200 MK2 turntable.
courtesy of Techies USA,
recording studios, is usually placed between the turntables. This equipment is
plugged into the venue's sound system, so that the music the DI plays is amplified
through loudspeakers. Example 1.1 shows a Technics SL-1200 series turntable
{the most commonly used turntable in electronic dance music), and exemple 1.2
presents @ high-end mixing boa
‘The Di uses this equipment to create @ continuous flow of music. There
music and environment that has become essen
also helps position the DJ as a creator rather than a mere presen
leads to the set being perceived as @ whole shaped by the DI rather than as @
amiconsumet decries etal ap; hte. 2005 om
Hepctvmebackspin.ogfoma nl Fo
vn plonserprd}com. Al pages ted 16 June 2008
52 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
infomation about the DIN600, vist hap
seties of songs recorded by other artists. Mixing in is most
quential: the end of one record o
‘amount of time involved in the mix can vaty considerably, however: the DJ might
imix the second h half of record 8, of play the two
is togath might jump back and forth
tumtable is connected to a separate channel on the mixing board, thereby allow-
ing the DJ to control the volume of each record independently w
(ed at the top of the mixer—appear in the
bottom half of example 1.2.% In addition to the vertical faders, 0! mixing boards
always contain another slider cal
| the bottom of ex. 1.2). The cross fader controls the balance between two chan-
‘ols: the
fader (see the three shapes pictured just above the cross fader on the DIM-600).
up to the DJ to determine whether to employ the vertical faders, the cross
ty, but the cross fader
Besides controling the volume of each record in the mix, the DJ is ako able
idval records with the knobs found above the
3" (short for “equal term that
use as well. Each EQ knob controls a different range of the frequency
“Spectrum, most commonly divided into high, middle, and low Dis use the EQs
jon con serve a variety
functions: it can be @ way of adjusting the sound of a record to the acoustics
a paticular room and sound system; it can help two records blend more
and forh is more
The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 53| seine tempo be maintained from one record to the next Ti
_ of certain conventions of EDM Diing and composition—Dis ust
tations per minute, the turntables used in EDM
' dane witha slider (usually
speeds of either 33 oF 45
Diing allow continuous tempo adjustment. Th
The tempo variation
cet, although some Dis take th
Ea wider range of variation.
Dis maintain a constant tempo through a process called “beat mat
(or, less commonly, “beat mixing"), Fundamental to EDM mixing, lke learning
in tune, beat matching isa core skil thet must be mastered
|. The "beat" referred to is
the steady quarter notes of the bass
‘rum—although in more syncopated genres (eg, [unger 'n’ bass) is pres-
| ence may have to be infeed. To match the beats of record 8 with those of
| record A, the DI listens to record B (orto the combination of and B) through
_ headphones, while Keeping the mixing board on a seting that allows the audi-
ence to hear record A ony. The slider is then used to adlust the tempo of record
|B s0 thatthe two records are moving at exacty the same speed, In addition,
| the beats must be synchronized, which is accomplished by pushing the record
Every slightly foward or backward
| Another component of mixing, rarely mentioned in written descriptions of
| the process, but equally important, i the alignment of larger periodicities: mee-
sures, hypermeasures, and formal sections To accomplish this alignment, 2
technique knowm as “slp-cueing” becomes crcl. Once the D! has “cued up”
record B through beat matching she hold itn piace with e finger. A
ranges from +8 to —8 per
tumtables apart and modify them to obtain
Example 1.2. Pioneer DIW-600 mixing board,
Coury of Pronger Electronics (USA, Ine
effective it can call attention to an interesting part of a record; and it can
ly intensify (and possibly distor) 2 sound through a process called |
(to be discussed further in chapter 6), Textural manipulation occurs
when the DI uses the EQs to remove a certain p
‘the bass drum, though the DJ might remove other parts to make @ mix work
more effectively, For instance, if two synthesizer lines create too much pitch
dissonance, one of them could be excised fiom the mix.
The aesthetic of continuity that dominates EDM mixing requires not only
stationary while the turntable spins undemeath ft. The DJ then lets it go when
| record A reaches the desired point of synchronization, Some DJs also rock the
leo fequnty
‘54 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE ‘The History and Creation of Electronic Danco Music 55record back and forth in time with the first record's beat while holding
manner.
‘The process of beat matching requires great precision. Beats that might seem
gradually go out of phase if they are not aligned exact.
characterized by perpetual mechine-generated rhythms, unmatched
shoes in a dryer.” EDM audiences are also quite sensitive to the importance of
beat matching: a "train wreck," a term dancers use for an obviously unsuccessful
imix, can clear the floor instantly,
‘The virwosity and precision associated wi
contemporary Diing have been
amount of time to reach full speed; in adsition, be
slightly in tempo as a record plays—a behavior that might not be noticeable
‘when listening to a single recor, but that becomes @ serious
to coordinate two records precisely. Stopping a
‘ue also strains the belt. With a “direct-drive” turntable, the mi
directly o the deck, AS a resuit, the record never vates in speed, and the Dd i,
able to stop and start a record instantaneously, at whatever spead is desired,
thereby allowing much more fast-paced and flexible mi
Features such 2s continuous tempo adjustment and the drect-dive turntable
began to appear during the 1970s, They first became widespread, however, in
1979, when the Technics St-1200 series turntable appeared on the market. In
addition to continuous tempo adjustment and a direct-drve motor, the Technics
1200 is designed so thatthe oud, resonant bass sounds characteristic of EDM
not cause became the industry standard, to the extent
‘that tumtable technology has hardly changed since its introduct
In addition to the standard turntables, headphones, and mixing board, Dis
may utilize a of supplementary equipment. Perhaps the most common
supplementary device i the effects processo
‘56 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
_dscaurse, these effects are often referred to collectively as “EFX.” An effects unit
may be a separate device plugged into the mixing board or buit into the board
Hise. Free-standing devices can be controlled in a variety of ways; in addition
‘the standard knobs and sliders, there are units featuring touch-pads, track
and even an infrared laser beam that allows three-dimensional manipu:
IM-600, for instance, contains an on-board
also include @ sampler,
other device that may be on-boatd or free-standing. The sampler allows the
to extract a short excerpt from a record (or, for that matter, from any sound
re connected to the sampler) and introduce it into the mix; if an effects unit
's also present, the sound can be manipulated as wel. Less commonly, some DJs
= employ drum machines and other instruments in their sets, in the manner ofthe
_ early Chicago house Ds. An example of a recent recording incorporating a num
ber of these elements is Richie Hawtin’s DJ mix entitled Decks, EPX & 909
(NovaMute 3055-2, 1999). On this recording Hatin utilizes three turntable
effects processor, and Roland TR-909 drum machine, playing portions of thiry-
ight records in approximately one hou
As previously described, twelve-nch vinyl is the standard format for elec
“rronic dance music. In order to achieve maximum power and resonance by
"spreading out the grooves of the record, most twelveinch dance singles are
"considerably shorter than a rock album; they typically contain between two and
buted between the records two sides, Tracks range from four
th lengths of about six minutes being particularly
, those that have distinct til) va
fed tracks plus various altemate mixes
F remixes, but in some cases all the tracks are unique
During the 1970s, when the twelveinch format developed, vinyl was stil
the standard medium for singles throughout the popular music industry; dance
‘music differed only in the size of its releases (twelve- versus sevens inch sin
In the 1980s, however, @ new mecium, the compact disc, soon surpassed
formats in popularity. Yet vinyl continued to be the material of choice
EDM, Though dual CD players with variable speed control have been available
for some time, these devices do nat allow the tactile control essential to modem.
Diing, As the techniques | have described illustrate, Dis find the beat and cue
‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 57records by touching them directly with their hands, and advanced techniques
ing are even more dependent on manual interaction, Within th
however, new CD players aimed at the DJ market have been
released. A picture of one such “claftal turntable,” the Pioneer CDJ-1000, is
shown in example 1.3. Though the CD enters via a sl
the device features @ round interface that can be conta
the files. Example 1.4 shows a potential Final Scratch setup. The
mixing board are standard; itis the software and records that a
Courtesy of Paneer Electrics (USA, In
588 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
‘Example 1.4, Final Scratch setup on two turntables and a mixing board.
Courtesy of Stanton Magnets.
we than the producer. Because an EDM recoring artist
on rather than the rule, the DY’ performance
n than the producer's recording,
at favors relatively generic
this context. In a typical DY
only a few tracks by name; producers
They also obscure
The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 59their Identities by recording under multiple names: As | noted
tion, one result of the producer's anonymity is a substant
‘of contemporary writing (bath scholarly and jour
paragraphs | begin to address this gap by
components involved, while in chapter 6
i used in relation to aspects of rth, meter, a
y Sound captured through this technique,
ily tothe process of obtaining sounds inthis
explore how this equipmer
form,
‘The materials used to make electronic dance music are diverse, varying con- 4
siderably ftom producer to producer and constantly developing as technology
Jmproves. Four main functions—synthesis, processing, sampling, and sequenc-
ing—are essential to production. Each function occurs in both hardware and
software manifestations: onthe one hand, there are machines called synthesizes,
effects processors, samplers, and sequencers; on the other, there are computer
Programs that fal the same functions. Only rarely are these categories src
technology fulfils several functions 1S primary
jeces of equipment contain softwar will be most pro-
‘erm fom Brewster an Brougeton 2000:
keyboa” camot be played “ey
eyboarésnaped irterae, and they ere quite snl (the etre instrument is approximately one foot
In wih Rather, the deca mut be programed, wth ches nd thytimsentred sopra.
buttons set ontop of @
68 GETTING INTO THE GROOVEcomplicate the picture further, some twelve-inches contain mt
"track by its original producer, thereby undermining any effort to identify a single
recording as authoritative. In any event, distinctions between all these types of
le of no concer to Dis, who simply choose the mix that they
iences like best. A remix of a track may be much bigger hit than
which may receive litle or no club lay at all»
In between the D1’s performance and the producers recording isthe “live
| PA." a term used to desctibe live performances by producers. The term does not
| refer to performances by producers as Dis but, rather se of
| stucio technology during
ike events, and at “concerts” given by the most comm
_EDM performers they do not usually occur as part of a regular evening at 2
ib, Just as the equipment producers use in te studio v
technology employed in these per
_ thesizers and other equipment: for instance, at 2 performer
_ (2 group of musicians om the Underground Resistance label) that f attended in
2 May 31, 2004, one musician ("Mad” Wike Banks) played Keyboards
instruments and human performers. With the
tendency is evident in the manufacturer's own characterization of the
product. However, technology is rarely used in this manner in EDM. Producers
steer clear of sounds that approximate acoustic instruments, pref
the sound of, | don’t know, a great piano or
that, get the real thing. For us, synthesizers are
sounds. t's all about making sounds that na one has ever heard before.
HvBRID RoLes
Some of the musically creative activities that occur in electronic dance music b
the boundaries between the normally clearly defined roles of recording arti
ming artist. Two of the most common of these hybrid roles, which | wi
‘explore briefly in te following section, are those of remixer and live PA.
Technically, remixing is @ type of production work. In practice, however,
changes music in much the same way as Diing, and it Is gen
people who are Dis. In fac, many Dis who do not produce
create remixes. Remixes may be “authorized” or “bootlegged," depending upon
whether they are sanctioned by the producer of the remixed track. Today, the
vast majority of them are authorized: in fact, they are usually solicited by the
PAs, the musicians sit in
blasts out of huge speaker stacks surrounding them; | observed one such per-
| formance in this style by Nobukaza Takemura atthe 2001 Detroit Electronic Music
Festival The extent to which the live PA is Improvised also vares cons
remixer uses these as raw material, while also adding his or her own material.
‘The extent to which the remix departs from the
siderably. Some remixes keep the structure of the
‘ype of performance, tracks are usually played continu-
_ ously in the manner of a Di set, though they are created with sequencers and
| other technology rather than played ftom recordings; two producers whom 1
This approach
op songs. However,
construct the track. Elements from the master recording will be chopped up,
processed, and reordered, and sometimes so many new elements willbe added
that it wil be dificult to detect any features ofthe or
My des mixing preserves a clear
recording and its remixes. In practice, however, this boundary is often quite
blurry. In many cases, no time interval separates the primary recording and its
remixes; when a track is fist released, its twelve-inch commonly contains the
" version of a track as well as several remixes by different artists. To.
by Azo Da
4 60 Fkentschar
ude Howes such as Moby, Cherical Brothers, and The Prodigy. As
_ pat th champoning by the lger msc indus, these ac ave been expected fo
= i east to ceain exten, to rok conventions; ence they appear in public g9 “on tur,” have
sce respects to rock cree ad often contin rare than one membres
482. Adam Jay also perfor both DJ sts en live AS, although ou inten focused largely
nbs sto work.
70 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE ‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 71ches contain multiple versions of a
_ track by its original produces, thereby undermining any effort to identify a single
tecording as authoritative. In any event, cstinctions between all these types of
ies are of litle or no concer to Dis, who simply choose the mix that they
audiences like best. A remix of a track may be a much bigger hit than
portrayed as substitutes for “real” instruments and human performers. With the
303, this tendency is evident in the manufacturer's own characterization ofthe
product. However, technology is rarely used in this manner in EDM, Producers.
clear of sounds that approximate acoustic instruments, prefering to use
lectronic machines ir own special sonic attributes, In 2 1997 interview
(reprinted in Rule 1999: 8), the Chemical Brothers express this attitude very
larly mance and the producer's recording is the “live
/e performances by producers. The tem does not
This idee of having to replete the sound of! dort know, a great piano or
whatever | meat if you want that, get the real thing, For us, synthesizes are F teler to performances by producers as Dis but, rath
for making sounds that no other machines can make—not for copying other
sounds t's all about making sounds that no one has ever heard before.
they do not usually occur as part of a regular evening at a
ust a5 the equipment producers use inthe sti varies, o, 0, des the
_‘echnology employed in these performances. Some producers actually “play” syn-
ers and other equipment: for instance, at @ performance by
‘ans from the Underground Resistance label) that | attended in
Derot on May 31, 2004, one musician ("Mad Mike Bons) payed keyboards
_ anther cummed wit his hands onan electronic rum pd, tid musician
and projections of visual images
and thematically) with the music.
A other live PAS, the musician st infront of a laptop computer while the music
sts out of huge speaker stacks surrounding them; | observed one such per:
ce in tis style by Nobukaza Takemura atthe 2001 Detroit Electronic Music
The extent to which the five PA is improvised also varies considerably
create their ovm tracks in more or less complete form when
this type of performance, tracks are usually played continu:
Easy in the manner of a DJ set, though they are created with sequencers and
198; two producers whom |
yBRio notes
‘Some of the musically creative activities that occur in electronic dance music
the boundaries betieen the normaly cl
performing artist. Two of the most common of these yori
explore briefly in the following section, are those of remixer and lve PA.
Technically, remixing is 2 type of production work. in practice, however,
changes music in much the seme way a Diing, and itis generally done by
people who are Di
create remixes, Remixes may be “authorized” or “bootlegged,” depending upor
‘whether they are sanctioned by the producer of the remixed track. Today, the
vast majority of them are author tod by the
To start, the producer aves the remi
contain a separate recording of each instrumental or vocal fine, The,
while also adding his or her own materia
The extent to which the remix departs from the orignal recording can vary cane
siderably. Some remixes keep the structure of the original track largely intact and
y add a few new elements (e.g, new percussion parts, ora different synti
ine). This eporoach is especially common wien Dis ate asked to remix Top 40
op songs. However, it is much tore common for the remixer to rai
construct the track, Elements from the master recording will be chopped Up
processed, and reordered, and sometimes so many new elements will be ad
that it wil be difficult to detect any features of the S
‘My description of remixing preserves a clear ci
recording and its remixes. In practice, however, this boundary Is often 4)
blury. In many cases, no time interval separates the primary recording and
twelveinch commonly conta
80, These performers inclu figures such as Moby, Chena Bother, and The Prodigy. As
bet oftheir championing bythe larger music industry, these acs have been expected to confer,
‘est to a continent, to rock conventions; hence they apgear pubic go “onto,” have
sv respects to rock concerts and often contin mere han ane members
some respect)
‘one ofa number esc in Loubet 2000.
0 perfor both Dy sts and ve PAs, though ou interes fc lage
‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 71
7 GETTING INTO THE GROOVEsimply improvise with loops (short repeating patterns) stored in thelr computer
or sequencer."
sical. Ina quite specific sense, the dancers motions are rhythmic, they add a
counterpoint to the sounding patterns of the music. Moreover, to dance to this
music is to interpret it. On the dance floor, motion is largely an individually
determined phenomenon. There are no predetermined steps or choreography;
instead, each dancer must shape his or her response to the music as it unfolds,
| Hence Fikentscher’s description of EDM dance as “musicking in movement”
seems particularly appropriate. As he notes, “musicking in sound and musicking
in movement happen simultaneously and in relation to each other” (2000: 58).*
THE DANCER
Dancers, whom I have described as the “performing audience” (p. 47), form a
thitd side of the triangle of creative activity in electronic dance music. Construct
ing this network in three parts is unusual; most scholarship has portrayed the
World of music in binary terms, maintaining a conceptual separation between
music's creator and its audience. The di
fundamental to musiclogy, f
‘duction and consumption has long been a part of popu : general
ever, there are several reasons wity dance, as practiced within EDM, should be extent of interaction involved can vary considerably. "Dancing together” might
viewed as a creative musical performance. Fist in contrast to many other dance ply dancing near each other, responding to each other's motions with-
based tracitions (e.9., ballet), EDM dancers ata lve event can have a significant ly touching, o pysica Wg through dance. Even when dancers
impact upon the sounds that unfold. Successful Dis are highly attuned to the 1c, however, the primary focal points of EDM dancing are ohysical and
crowd's behavior, most do not play prearranged sets, instead preferring to shape musical expression rather than “ritualized courtship” (Fkentscher 2000: 66). The
their performance as the evening unfolds in order to get a maximal response
from the people on the floor. AS a result, the audience's actions—whether o
not they dance, the intensity with which they dance, and the other physical and
verbal cues that they ive tothe DJ-—can affect what music willbe played, when
it will be played, and how it will be played.
Furthermore, communication flows in both linear and lateral directions: ta
4s, not only between audience and DJ, but also within the audience itel
Vidual dancers collaborate with the DJ and with ezch other to create a sense of
“vibe"—a powerful affective quality associated with the experience of going
dancing—among those present. Although the type of vibe sought out may vary
depending on the style of music played, the people in attendance, and the type
of event, this sense of communal energy isan essential part ofan effective event
Most dance music fans appreciate a performance that
teresting and techni
does not coaperate in generating a vibe to surround
At the same time, the audience does not have direct control over the music
‘that is played. They cannot select the music; they can only respond to what the
DJ offers them. Nevertheless, their participation remains both creative and mu:
between creation and reception is
bbe nearby. Some dancers also use accessories, such as light “toys” that
h, or glow; inthis way, dance can acquire another dimension of technolog
mediation,
The individualistic nature of EDM dancing should not be overemphasized,
however. Being one among a crowd of dancers is clearly a communal experience,
‘one that can bring on powerful emotions.® Furthermore, there are common pat-
‘tems of motion in EDM,* and many dancers are influenced by the ways in which
‘others around them move, These themes—ingividualism in the midst of a com-
rmunal context—come to the fore in the following excerpt from an interview with
85 Fketscher dies the canept of “musicking” fom Srl 1987, who posts the term as
2 vay of coneeptaling music a an acti
186. See abo Malion 1999, Ao relevant, however, are Pi
furterdisuin ofthe communal apc of EDM dancin S08 Fkerscher 2000 (sp.
bon 1959 (esp. 70-133).
ned ways of moving, thee are aso certain ses of dance known
Break dancing. a vruosie ste that aose as apart hip hop
occur aly sporadically in most
avis ofen describe 2 unig stl of dancing
of moves the way in which they ae combined
dually determined, See Buldand 2002 for sore interesting description of dances
dance il
‘requ seeespacly pp 80-82 (Fkantcher 200) movements,
72 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE ‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 73,J Impact (who, as a parttime teacher of Latin dance as well as a clubber, was
able to offer particularly lear descriptions of his experiences):
‘Mark Butler: You say you have “moves.” Did you think about how you're going
to move ahead of time, before you heard the music, or is it something you
7
have are | guess
my dancing “stolen” #
Ds Impact: Yeah, there's defintely
pattems. And when | notice m
Afferent, because obvious
I can see mysel
ing th
In his comments, DJ Impact describes @ number of negotiations between individ
tal and communal aspects of dancing. On the one hand, he wants his dancing
‘to blend in with that of the crowd as a whole, and he leams from the ways
others move. On the other hand, he is concerned that his dancing should appear
sufficiently distinctive, while also believing that most of those around him are
In commenting on the ole of dence within EDM, | have emphasized elements
‘an understanding ofthe musica phenomena that
the creative and musical capacities in which dancers
inyolved, as well as the balance between and among individual and com
munel forces within live musical events. Many more questions might be pursued
at length: for instance, how and to what extent might particular ways of moving
correlate to particular musical phenomena, and how might these physical behav-
iors be understood as rhythmic or otherwise musical phenomena in thelr own
tight? These are immensely complicated questions that no current study of EDM
has addressed in any depth, although several recent studies have made important
contributions toward our understanding ofthe aesthetic and cultural that
7 GETTING INTO THE GROOVE
tape dance as a general practice. In the spit of the comments offered in the
rodction, it would be desirable to see scholars account not only for specific
musical practices but also for specific ways of moving in relation to those prac-
ies, tis toward the first of these goals that | will now diect my attention
‘The History and Creation of Electronic Dance Music 75