Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Cmu Vs Executive Secretary - Envilaw Digest

    Caricato da

    Mariel David
    585 visualizzazioni4 pagine
    1) Central Mindanao University (CMU) was granted land by President Garcia through Proclamation Order 476 for school grounds. 2) President Arroyo later issued Proclamation Order 310, which redistributed 670 hectares of CMU's land to indigenous peoples (IPs). 3) CMU claimed PP 310 was unconstitutional. The key issue was whether PP 310 was valid and constitutional given CMU's existing property rights over the land.

    Descrizione originale:

    cmu vs executive secretary environmental law

    Titolo originale

    Cmu vs Executive Secretary --Envilaw Digest

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formati disponibili

    PPTX, PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    1) Central Mindanao University (CMU) was granted land by President Garcia through Proclamation Order 476 for school grounds. 2) President Arroyo later issued Proclamation Order 310, which redistributed 670 hectares of CMU's land to indigenous peoples (IPs). 3) CMU claimed PP 310 was unconstitutional. The key issue was whether PP 310 was valid and constitutional given CMU's existing property rights over the land.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PPTX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    585 visualizzazioni4 pagine

    Cmu Vs Executive Secretary - Envilaw Digest

    Caricato da

    Mariel David
    1) Central Mindanao University (CMU) was granted land by President Garcia through Proclamation Order 476 for school grounds. 2) President Arroyo later issued Proclamation Order 310, which redistributed 670 hectares of CMU's land to indigenous peoples (IPs). 3) CMU claimed PP 310 was unconstitutional. The key issue was whether PP 310 was valid and constitutional given CMU's existing property rights over the land.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PPTX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 4

    CMU VS EXECUTIVE

    SECRETARY
    PONENTE: Justice Roberto Abad
    DATE OF PROMULGATION: June 8, 2013

    FACTS
    CENTRAL MINDANAO UNIVERSITY
    President Garcia issued PP 476
    Grants land to CMU for school
    grounds
    300 Ha of remaining untitled land
    were distributed to cultural
    communities in the area
    President Gloria Arroyo issued PP310
    Redistributes 670Ha of CMUs
    land to IPs
    CMU claimed unconstitutionality of
    PP310

    Redistibut
    es CMUs
    land

    Issue of the Case:


    WHETHER OR NOT PP 310
    I S VA L I D A N D
    CONSTITUTIONAL

    HELD
    Key question: Character of the Land
    CMU vs DARAB
    Necessity for vast tract of agricultural land for
    expansion
    The education of the youth and agrarian reform
    are admittedly among the highest priorities in the
    government & social economic programs. Neither
    need give way to another
    Lands by their character become inalienable
    IPRA- already existing and vested property rights
    should be respected

    Potrebbero piacerti anche