Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Criteria
Reflection
(2x)
Unsatisfactory
The reflections do not describe
growth or include goals for
continued learning. The
reflections are not connected
strongly to a standard and
specifically to an element in
that standard. The reflections
do not illustrate the ability to
effectively critique work or
provide suggestions for
constructive practical
alternatives. The reflection is
short (a couple of sentences).
Limited
A few of the
reflections describe
growth and include
goals for continued
learning. A few of the
reflections are
somewhat connected
to a standard and
specifically to an
element in that
standard. A few
reflections illustrate
the ability to
effectively critique
work and provide
suggestions for
constructive practical
alternatives. The
reflection is short (3-5
sentences).
Proficient
Most of the reflections
describe growth and
include goals for
continued learning.
Most of the reflections
are connected strongly
to a standard and
specific element in
that standard. Most of
the reflections
illustrate the ability to
effectively critique
work and provide
suggestions for
constructive practical
alternatives. The
reflection is of
appropriate length.
(Minimum of 1
paragraph; 5-8
sentences).
Exemplary
All reflections clearly describe
growth, achievement,
accomplishments, and include
goals for continued learning
(long and short term). All of the
reflections are connected
strongly to a standards and
specific element in that standard.
All of the reflections are
connected to a standard and
specifically to an element in that
standard. All reflections illustrate
the ability to effectively critique
work and provide suggestions for
constructive practical
alternatives. The reflection is of
appropriate length (minimum of
8 sentences per domain).
Use of
Multimedia
(1)
Navigation
(.5)
Layout and
Readability
(1)
The eportfolio is
generally easy to read.
Color, background,
font styles, and type
Quality of
Writing and
Proofreading
(.5)