Legislative Fiscal Bureau
‘One East Man, Sute 301» Madison, WE $5703» (608 2663847 Fa: (608 257-5873
mai fscl howau@egowisconsingov= Webs: b/lps.iaconsn go
February 13, 2015
TO: Democratic Members
Joint Committee on Finance
FROM: Al Runde, Supervising Analyst
SUBIECT: History of GPR Debt Restructuring and Planned Amount in May, 2015
‘As you requested, the attached table lists the GPR debt restructuring actions the state has
carried out, as well as the administration's planned restructuring of 2 GPR commercial paper
principal payment due in May, 2015.
Economic Refinancing versus Debt Restructuring
Generally, debt is refinanced through either an economic refunding or a structural refunding,
or @ combination of those methods. In an economic refunding, the new stream of debt service
payments is designed to reduce the total cost of the outstanding debt and is typically undertaken to
take advantage of reduced interest rates. No increase in debt service payments occurs in any year
due to an economic refunding and debt service payments are reduced in some or all years during the
life of the refunding issue. ‘The transaction can be structured so that the debt service savings are
realized equally in each year during the life of the refunding bonds or concentrated in the early or
Tae years of the transaction.
Under a structural refunding, the new stream of debt service payments can be higher or
ower in a given year than under the current stream of payments. For example, the debt service
payments in the early years of the refunding could be reduced while debt service payments are
increased in future years compared to the existing repayment schedule, Under past restructurings,
for GPR budgetary reasons, the state has simply issued debt to make a current principal payment
due and deferred a current principal payment due. A structural refunding extends the average life of
previously issued debt. Principal on the bonds is outstanding longer and therefore, the interest costs
to the issuer are greater.
Commercial Paper Principal
The proposed restructuring of the May, 2015, GPR principal repayment of a portion of the
state's outstanding commercial paper, which is identified in the attachment, would involve delaying$108,000,000 in GPR principal that had been previously scheduled to be retired. Unlike
outstanding bond principal, restructuring a commercial paper payment does not require the
Legislature to authorize any refunding bond authority in order to carry out such an action. Rather,
the administration can simply direct the Department of Administration Capital Finance officials to
not make the scheduled principal payment. This can occur because the state's commercial paper
program is effectively a short term line of credit, in which the state, under the agreed terms of the
line of credit, is only required to make annual interest payments on the principal borrowed on the
line of credit. Although, in creating its commercial paper borrowing program, the state has
generally attempted to retire the outstanding principal on its outstanding commercial paper using the
same principal repayment structure that it uses for general obligation bonds (generally a 10 to 20
year repayment schedule). As a result, DOA Capital Finance has established a principal repayment
schedule for the state's outstanding commercial paper, including a May, 2015, payment of
$108,000,000 budgeted for in the 2013-15 budget. However, because only the interest on that
outstanding principal is due under the credit agreement, the administration can defer paying the
principal on these obligations in any given year.
While the 2015-17 budget bill does not include debt restructuring, the expenditure reduction
from the May, 2015, restructuring action is included in the opening general fund balance for the
2015-17 biennium under the Governor's budget proposal. In addition, the Governor's biennial
budget proposal would increase GPR debt service by $544,900 in 2015-16 and $18,746,900 in
2016-17 relating to the administration's decision to restructure $108,000,000 in outstanding state
commercial paper principal that would otherwise be due in May, 2015. The increased debt service
costs in 2015-16 are associated with interest on the $108,000,000 in deferred principal. The debt
service costs in 2016-17 also reflect interest due on the deferred principal as well as the repayment
of a portion of the deferred principal.
Thope this information is helpful. Please contact me if you have any further questions.
AR/sas
Attachment
Page 2Action
2001 Act 16
2001 Act 109
2003 Act 129
2007 Act 226
2009 Act 28
2011 Act 13
2011 Act 32
May, 2015
ATTACHMENT
(in Millions)
Fiscal Year ‘Type of Obligation
2001-02 Commercial Paper
2002-03 Commercial Paper
2003-04 2004 Series 3
2007-08 Commercial Paper
2008-09 Commercial Paper
2009-10 2009 Series 1
2009-10 2010 Series 1
2009-10 Commercial Paper
2010-11 Commercial Paper
2010-11 2011 Series 1
2010-11 2011 Series 1
2011-12 2011 Series 2
2011-12 Commercial Paper
2011-12 2012 Series 1
2014-15 Commercial Paper
Grand Total
Pages
jory of GPR Debt Restructuring with Proposed May, 2015, Amount
Amount
$102.0
25.0
175.0
63.6
616
SA
201.2
107.0
107.0
25.1
165.0
434
1048
218.0
$1,563.1