Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY
PROCEDURE
1. IDENTIFY & MAJOR DEPOSITIONAL UNITS
2. INTEGRATE WELL & SEISMIC
3. ANLYZE REFLECTION CHRACTERISTICS
4. RELATE LITHOLOGY TO SEISMIC
5. PREDICT ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING & LITHOLOGY
6. DETERMINE AN AGE MODEL
7. EVALUATE PREDICTIONS
SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY
TECHNIQUE
1. SEISMIC SEQUENCE ANALYSIS
2. SEISMIC-WELL TIE
3. SEISMIC FACES ANALUSIS
4. SEISMIC CALIBRATION
5. GEOLOGIC INTERPRETION
6. CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
7. SEISMIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC MODELING
USING A STRATIGRPHIC
FRAMEWORK
STRATIGRAPHIC
FRAMEWORK
ANALYSIS
BURIAL
HISTORY
MODELING
TEMPERATURE
HISTORY
HYDROCARBON
GENERATION
PREDICTION
SOURCE
MIGRATION
TRAP
DEVELOPMENT
AND TIMING
RESERVOIR
PROPERTIES
RESERVOIR
SEAL
TRAP
LAMINA
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
I
N
G
LAMINASET
BED
CONTROLS
E
P
I
S
O
D
I
C
STORMS
FLOODS
TIDES
BEDSET
PARASEQUENCE
PARASEQUENCESET
SEQUENCE
C
Y
C
L
I
C
SHIFTING SEDIMENT
DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS
SEA-LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS
LONG-TERM TECTONICS
FORMATION
BOUNDING
SURFACES
MORPHOLOGY
A SINGLE EPISODE
OF DEPOSITION
BEDDING
PLANES
DEPOSITIONAL
SEQUECES
A SINGLE CYCLE
OF DEPOSITION
UNCONFORMITIES
LIMITED EXTENT
WIDESPREAD
SMALL THICKNESS
THICK ENOUGH TO
RESOLVE SEISMICALLY
TERMINATES WHERE
BEDDING SURFACES
INTERSECT
TERMINATES AGAINST
UNCON-FORMITIES OR
THEIR CORRELATIVE
SEISMIC REFLECTION
GENERATED AT PHYSICAL SURFACES ACROSS WHICH
THERE IS A CHANGE IN IMPEDENCE
POLARITY IS DETERMINED BY SIGN OF THE REFLECTION
COEFFCIENT
AMPLITUDE IS A FUNCTION OF:
- MAGNITUDE OF THE REFLECTION COEFFCIENT
- SHARPNESS OF THE REFLECTION COEFFCIENT
- RESOLUTION OF THE SYSTEM
UNCONFORMITIES
TIME-STRATIGRAPHY
YES
YES
STRATAL
SURFACES
SEPARATES OLDER
STRATA BELOW FROM
YOUNGER STRATA
ABOVE
MARK
ONSETS (ZERO-CROSSINGS) FRO MINIMUM
PHASE
PEAKS?TROUGHS FOR ZERO PHASE
REFLECTION CHARECTERISTICS CAN VARY
ALONG AN UNCONFORMITY
HOWEVERE
REFLECTION CHRACTERISTICS ARE AFFECTED
BY CHANGES IN THE FACIES
- REFLECTION AMPLITUDE
- REFLECTION CONTINUITY
- REFLECTION POLARITY
LIMITATIONS
RESOLUTION
VERTICAL
LATERAL
IMPROPER POSITIONING REFLECTIONS
DIP ANALOG SECTION
OUT-OF-PLANE REFLECTION
NONPRIMARY REFLECTIONS
NONCOHERENT NOISE
COHERENT NOISE
LITHOLOGY PREDICTION
SEISMIC DATA
CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC
FRAMEWORK
SEISMIC
SEQUENCES
SEISMIC
REFLECTION
CHARACTERISTICS
DEPOSITIONAL
FRAMEWORK
DEPOSITIONAL
ENVIRONMENT
SEISMIC SEQUENCE
ANALYSIS
SEISMIC FACIES
ANALYSIS
GEOLOGIC
INTRPRETATION
LITHOLOGY
PREDICTION
CORE
ANALYSIS
REFLECTION
GEOMETRIES
REFLECTION
CHARACTERISTICS
CALIBRATION
INTERPRETATION
FACIES
MODEL
DEPOSITIONAL
ENVIRONMENT
PRIDICTION
SEDIMENT
SUPPLY
LOG
ANALYSIS
CALIBRATE
INTERBRATE
DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS
SUBENVIRONMENTS SETTING
PREDICT
SEISMIC FACIES
PARAMETERS
REFLECTION GEOMETRIES
TERMINATION PATTERN
INTERNAL CONFIGRATION
EXTERNAL FORM
REFLECTION CHARACTERISTICS
AMPLITUDE
CONTINUITY
FREQUENCY
INTERVAL VELOCITY
REFLECTION GEOMETRIES
INTERNAL CONFIGURATIONS
UNSTRATIFIED
STRATIFIED
SIMPLE
PROGADATIONAL
COMPLEX
SEGMIOD
MOUNDED
OBLIQUE
HUMMOCHY
COMBINATION
DEFORMED
BARALLEL
SUBPARALLEL
DIVERGENT
SHINGLED
CHAOTIC
REFLECTION
FREE
REFLECTION GEOMETRIES
EXTERNAL FORM
UNIFORM
THICKNESS
VARYING
THICKNESS
SHEET-EVEN
FILL
SHEET-DRAPE
MOND
SHEET-SMOOTHING
COMBINATION
GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS
ABC TECHNIQUE
EROSION
TOPLAP
CONCODANT
ONLAP
DOWNLAP
CONCORDANT
PARALLEL
SIGMOID
MOUNDED
SUBPARALLEL
OBLIQUE
HUMMOCKY
SHINGLED
DEFORMED
DIVERGENT
DEPOSITIONAL ENERGY
HIGH
LOW
DEPOSITIONAL
PROCESSES
SEDIMENTARY
FACIES
SORTED
POOR SORTING
COARSEST
AVAILABLE GRAIN
SIZE
FINE PRESENT
DIAGNOSTIC
GEOMETRIES
ACTIVE
TOPLAB/OBLIQUE
MOUNDS
EXPLORATION
QUIET WATER
SHEET/DRAPE
SIGMOID PROG.
SLOPE FRONT FILL
CONDITIONS
LITHOLOGY
LOW
UNIFORM
MASSIVE
HIGH
ALTERNATING
INTERFINGERED
VARIABLE
VARYING
DISCONTINUOUS
CONTINUITY
HIGH
DEPOSITION
WIDESPREAD
LITHOLOGY PREDICTION
I) ESTABLISH CHORONOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK
SEISMIC SEQUENCE ANALYSIS
TIE WELL AND SEISMIC
II) DEVELOP DEPOSOTIONAL FRAMEWORK
ANALYZE REFLECTION GEOMETRIES
TIE WELL AND SEISMIC
INTERPRET DEPOSITIONAL SETTING
CALIBRATE SEISMIC FACIES
EXTRAPOLATE AWAY FROM WELL(S)
USE FACIES MODELS
USE CONCEPT OF DEPOSITIONAL ENERGY
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
2-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUES
ADVANTAGES
CHEAP
MANUAL
(SERIAL
OVERLAY)
WITHOUT TIME
SLICES, FEW
CROSS LINES
NO SPECIAL
EQUIPMENT
FAST IN
STRUCTURA
LLY SIMPLE
AREAS
DISADVANTAGES
MISS STRUCTURES
THAT STRIKE SUBPARALLEL TO LINES
INACCURATE 3-D TIES
OF HORIZONS &
STRUCTURES
MAPPING IS
ADDITIONAL STEP
CUMBERSOME
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
3-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUES
MANUAL BUT WITH
TIME SLICES (GS)
SEISCROP
ADVANTAGES
EASY TO RECOGNIZE
STRUCTURES IN MOST
ORIENTATIONS
DISADVANTAGES
CUMBERSOME
AMPLITUDE CONTROLS
POSITION OF TIME SLICE
PICKS
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
3-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUE
S
TRUE 3-D GRID
ADVANTAGES
VERY DETAILED
MAPS
MOST ACCURATE
PICTURES OF FAULT
PATTERNS
HIGHEST
CONFIDENCE
INTERPRETATION
DISADVANTAGES
VERY SLOW
MANY TIES
USING A STRATIGRPHIC
FRAMEWORK
STRATIGRAPHIC
FRAMEWORK
ANALYSIS
BURIAL
HISTORY
TRAP
DEVELOPMENT
AND TIMING
MODELING
TEMPERATURE
HISTORY
HYDROCARBON
GENERATION
PREDICTION
SOURCE
MIGRATION
RESERVOIR
PROPERTIES
RESERVOIR
SEAL
TRAP
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
3-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUES
ADVANTAGES
CHEAP
MANUAL
(SERIAL
OVERLAY)
WITHOUT TIME
SLICES, FEW
CROSS LINES
NO SPECIAL
EQUIPMENT
FAST IN
STRUCTURA
LLY SIMPLE
AREAS
DISADVANTAGES
MISS STRUCTURES
THAT STRIKE SUBPARALLEL TO LINES
INACCURATE 3-D TIES
OF HORIZONS &
STRUCTURES
MAPPING IS
ADDITIONAL STEP
CUMBERSOME
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
3-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUES
MANUAL BUT WITH
TIME SLICES (GS)
SEISCROP
ADVANTAGES
EASY TO RECOGNIZE
STRUCTURES IN MOST
ORIENTATIONS
DISADVANTAGES
CUMBERSOME
AMPLITUDE CONTROLS
POSITION OF TIME SLICE
PICKS
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
3-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUE
S
TRUE 3-D GRID
ADVANTAGES
VERY DETAILED
MAPS
MOST ACCURATE
PICTURES OF FAULT
PATTERNS
HIGHEST
CONFIDENCE
INTERPRETATION
DISADVANTAGES
VERY SLOW
MANY TIES
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
3-D INTERPRETATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQU
ES
ISIS-
ADVANTAGES
ALOWS USE OF ANY
TECHNIQUE
EPR INTERACTIVE
MOST ACCURATE TIES OF TIME
SEISMIC
SLICES TO LINES AND LINES TO
INTERPRATATION
CROSS-LINES
SYSTEM
LESS PAPER TO SHUFFLE
AMPLITUDE/COLOR SCALING
IMAGE MANIPULATIONS
DISADVANTAGES
CONVERSION OF
SEISMIC DATA TO
ACCEPTABLE
FORMAT CAN BE
TIME-CONSUMMING
EXCESSIVE DETAIL
AVAILABLE
SEISMIC-WELL TIES
PURPOSE: TO COMBINE TWO DATA SETS FOR A MORE
COMPLETE INTERPERATION
SEISMIC DATA
WELL DATA
LINEAR DEPTH
SEISMIC VELOCITY
VELOCITY
SEISMIC IMPEDENCE
DENSITY
SEISMIC SEQUENCES
GEOLOGIC AGE
SEISMIC FACIES
LITHOLOGY
STRUCTURE
FAULT ORIENTATION