TABLES

OF COMPARISON

Single Table Analysis

Chi-square

df

Probability

40.1730

45

0.6763

An expected value is < 5. Chi-square not valid.

MEAN AGE GROUP ANALYSIS

MEANS Age
Age Frequency Percent
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25

2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
4
2
1
1
1
1

4.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
4.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
8.0%
8.0%
4.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%

Cum
Percent
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
22.0%
24.0%
32.0%
40.0%
44.0%
46.0%
48.0%
50.0%
52.0%

26
28
29
30
32
33
35
38
39
43
44
49
52
54
55
57
58
Total

3
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
50

6.0%
2.0%
2.0%
10.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
4.0%
100.0%

Obs Total Mean Variance Std Dev
50 1346.0000 26.9200 210.8506 14.5207

Minimum 25% Median 75% Maximum Mode
6.0000 18.0000 24.5000 33.0000 58.0000 30.0000

GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS

AGE GROUP PIE-CHART ANALYSIS

GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF A FEW VARIABLES

12.0% F

A 10.0%

6.0% E

10.0% D

B 34.0%

28.0% C

Agegroup

10% of patients who attended the hospital were in the age group 1-10 years. Likewise, 34%
in 11-20 years; 28% in 21-30 years; 10% in 31-40 years; 6% in 41-50 years; and 12% in 51-60
years. Maximum problem of the teeth is observed in the patients of age group 11-20 years
(34.0%), followed by 21-30 years (28.0%) while least in 41-50 years (6.0%).

SEX GROUP BAR GRAPH

31
30
29
28

COUNT

27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
Female

Sex

Male

There were only 19 males (38.0%) and 31 females (62.0%) who came for treatment as per
the data records.

GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS

COUNT

SCATTER PLOT FOR TREATMENT

10
5

X-ray

Scaling

RCT

Pulpectomy open+Extraction+X-ray+7E.

Pulpectomy

IOPA+composit filing

IOPA

Extraction

Composit filling

Amoxillin

Treatment

Most of the people came for a tooth extraction (14) followed by scaling (9) and the least
number for X-ray (1).