Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Aron
Saudi funds flowed like flood waters for the Dawas by Wahabis
and Islamist preachers, and the Hindus were told how that must
keep happening as a proof of religious choice and liberty.
Suddenly the whole anti-Hinduism bandwagon came to a
screeching halt- and was faced with Hinduism organizing such
conversions.
It was a Catch 22 situation!
The whole chorus abruptly turned to Stop Conversions!
All this while when Missionaries and Tawhids were year on year
receiving millions of dollars none so much as imagined a problem
with such foreign funded frenzy of religious conversions-as long
as it was clear Hinduism was the loser.
Now it became vital to do accounting for the funds, when some
small outfits were pulling a crowd towards Hinduism. The Media
comics became Auditors and did maths on TV screens- how much
was RSS spending for obtaining each convert?
It is clear that the Indian media and anti-hindu politics are
convinced that Hindus make for easy fools. Otherwise they
wouldnt dare tell this to any other faith group.
Will they dare say what they are saying to Hindus, that doing
conversions is a matter of fundamental Freedoms to the Saudis or
Iranian Ayotollahs or say Pakistanis?
But that is exactly what India had always granted for both
Christianity and Islam all along- while such conversions attract
Death penalties under the Sharia.
Somehow Hinduism alone looks criminal while attempting
Conversions.
Ridiculously again, Hinduism alone must also put up with
Conversions.
Now this is the catch- should Conversions be allowed or put an
end to?
Caught in a bind- the reaction of anti-Hinduism so far is amusing.
It takes gall to speak like that to any faith group, and sitting on
high horses.
But that was precisely what the British ambassador to Nepal did
even writing open letters to Nepalese media and leaders as this
Report showsBritish Ambassador to Nepal has asked the lawmakers to draft a
constitution that would ensure the right of the citizens to
conversion, drawing flak from the countrys pro-Hindu party who
called his remarks a blatant violation of diplomatic norms.
Andy Sparkes, UKs ambassador to Nepal, in an open letter to
lawmakers published in a national daily recently had, among other
things, asked them to ensure that the right to change religion is
Protected in the new statute.
That this British diplomat had the cheek to tell Hindu Nepal this
but wouldnt dream of telling Saudis, Qataris or Pakistanis is one
thing, but the slap got returned promptly.
The report adds thatThe government has decided to seek clarifications from Sparkes
and caution him against making such unwarranted suggestions.
Minister for Foreign Affairs Mahendra Bahadur Pandey said the
government will first seek clarifications from Sparkes to learn in
detail about his controversial remarks.
We are clear about what should be the provision about religion in
our statute. Any suggestion to us on this issue at this juncture of the
constitution writing process is unwarranted, Pandey was quoted as
Saying by My Republica.
President of Nepals pro-Hindu Rastriya Prajatantra Party Kamal
Thapa and lawmakers met Prime Minister Sushil Koirala and raised
Serious objection to Sparkes remarks.
The UK ambassador should be alerted for speaking such an
Catch 22.
Going by British ambassadors wishes, it looks like Church isnt
sure if it can forego conversion activities-since it is still a net loss
of Hinduism, with more Hindus converted by evangelists than
Hindu organizations can ever dream presently.
So a ban on All Conversions is something they cannot acceptwhich is why that is hardly the debate is about.
Somehow Hindu organizations alone must be shackled and
curbed-and that is exactly the mullah yadhav State government
had done- booking the organizers and filing charges against the
Converts-which is clearly a blatant Intimidation and violation of
fundamental rights.
The Churches also know that Post Christian void would also arrive
among Indian Christians.
If a Ban on All conversions is obtained, they would at least prevent
an en masse conversion back to Hinduism undoing age long toil of
Churches.
But missionaries are so invested heavily in Conversion as an
industry that they despair of no other gainful employment.
So the debate gets created but hangs on- this Church and Islamist
dilemma.
The minute it gets decided by them, the chorus will reset to that
different tune.
If Hinduism keeps losing- India must remain secular and Right to
Convert is Fundamental.
If Churches and Wahaabis feel they were losing to HinduismBan All Conversions immediately
This is why Hindus must refuse to ban Conversions on such
blatantly outspoken logic of anti-Hinduism.
Still, its a Win Win situation- to ban conversions now as
Conversions are more away from Hinduism. But this may reverse
in future and may not be wise for Hindus to stop what has tilted in
favor of Hinduism.
If Hindus agree to ban All Conversions now- they would shut the
Exit doors out of hostile dogmas for future generations and the
faster birth rate will demographically destabilize India and take
Hindus back to dhimmitude and loss of homeland.
With Hinduism it is actually Re-Conversions of descendants of
forcefully and lure fully converted Hindus by invaders and
colonialists.
Till the Masters Voice is clear- the anti-Hindu media and forces
will ask the mobs to get ready, work up a rage with them and put
an end to the Forceful Conversions.
They make such nice fools of Hindus.