Date:
To:
From:
For:
Subject:
City of Long Beach Memorandum
Working Together Serve
December 16, 2009
trick H. West, City Manag}
Michael Conway, Director of Ryblic Works Mie
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Phased repair of the Main Library roof
Background
On February 24, 2009, staff communicated to City Council the recommended
actions to address both the seismic issues related to, and the ongoing rain
intrusion through, the roof of the Main Library. At that time, staffs course of
action was to remove the concrete planters and the soil contained therein. As
Staff did not know what was at the bottom of the planters, it was stated that the
removal of the rooftop structures and soil would likely reveal unanticipated work,
Possibly related to asbestos remediation, lightweight concrete patchwork and
roofing membrane repair. These unknown conditions would then be assessed to
determine the most appropriate method to address rain water infiltration
On June 15, 2009, staff again communicated to City Council the results of early
test cases of concrete planter removal, the discovery of asbestos-containing
material, and a recommendation for a soils disposal location. Test cases of
concrete removal revealed that the planters were structurally tied to the roof and
could not easily be removed without significant impacts to the roof structure and
severe noise and dust impacts inside the Library. Consequently, staff focused on
removal of the soil only. Structural engineers were engaged, who determined that
the removal of just the soil from the overweight roof would result in a 22 percent
eduction in shear force rather than 27 percent if the concrete planters were
removed as well. This reduced project stil resulted in a significant improvement
in seismic stability, and also resulted in a significant reduction in cost
Test cases of soil removal revealed considerable aggregate material (various
sizes of stone and gravel material) at the base of the planters, which was
salvaged, and asbestos-containing material in the degraded membrane below
the soil and aggregate. Consequently, an asbestos remediation plan was
prepared to address this issue during the soil removal process so as not to
impede progress and delay completion
The project started in late July with the erection of barricades, pedestrian
protection measures and installation of a debris chute. Removal of the soil began
in eamest on September 3, 2009. Because the load bearing capacity of the roof
structure is low, heavy equipment could not be used for this operation, instead,
small bobcats, shovels and carts were used to remove the dirt from the planters
and transport the soil to the debris chute and then moved to trucks that werePatrick H. West
December 16, 2009
Page 2 of 3
Staged on Ocean Boulevard. This labor-intensive operation continued through
November 2009.
As soil was being removed and asbestos was being abated, certain deficiencies
in the drainage system were also discovered. These deficiencies included drain
inlets and pipes that were filled with aggregate, and planters with no drainage
Gevices at all. Staff worked to re-open the impeded drains and effected some
repairs to compromised drain lines. Additionally, certain drain inlets were
plugged, diverting the rainwater from drains whose drainpipes were known to
leak toward drains that were functioning adequately. Lastly, weep holes were
installed to allow other planters to drain
During the soil removal process, a number of sealant products were reviewed to
determine durability and effectiveness to act as a waterproofing membrane over
a variety of surface material. Some products were tested on the roof and in the
Planters and subsequently assessed for effectiveness. The results of these
investigations contributed to the preparation of thorough and detailed
specifications for a preferred roof sealant product. The specifications needed to
address the variety of surface materials, the condition of the existing membrane
as exposed after the removal of the soil, and the protection in place of
undegraded asbestos containing materials. These details of the specifications,
and the quantities of the materials related thereto, could not have been
adequately identified prior to the removal of the soil. Without such critical
information, detailed specifications could not have been prepared and bidders
would not be able to provide reliable pricing, exposing the City to unanticipated
and potentially significant, change orders.
Update
The removal of soil and demobilization was completed at the end of November
2009. Bid specifications were completed December 11, 2009 and provided to the
office of the City Attorney for review and approval. Also on December 11, 2009
an interim Purchase Order was approved to allow staff to patch-seal certain
Portions of the roof that are known to leak, ahead of the contract for sealing the
entire roof. This interim effort will begin on December 17, 2009, and will utilize
the same specifications developed for the preferred roof sealant, to ensure that
no funds are wasted in this interim effort.
It is expected that the bid will be released immediately after the holidays to
ensure a robust response and competitive pricing. A proposed contract will be
brought to City Council for consideration in mid to late January and work will
begin shortly thereafter.
|t is important to understand that the removal of the soil did not increase rain
infiltration to the Main Library. The faulty drainpipes and compromised roof
membrane were not negatively affected. The soil in the planters may havePatrick H. West
December 16, 2009
Page 3 of 3
served to delay some infiltration, resulting in slower leaks, but with a longer
duration. The removal of the soil, however, allows maintenance crews to remove
rainwater quickly from planters without drainage devices, avoiding long-term
infiltration, and the repair of drains that were blocked with aggregate. The overall
result of the removal of the soil is a roof that drains better.
If there are any questions regarding this project or this process, please contact
Mark Christoffels, Deputy Director of Public Works, at extension 8-671.