Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A) Testimony analysis
1) Heck Tate:
a) Pathos: Tates pathos is the way he describes how badly Mayella was beaten.
b) Ethos: Tates ethos is that he is a sheriff so everybody respects him.
c) Logos: Tates logos is that Mayella herself told him what happened so everybody should
believe it.
2) Bob Ewell:
a) Pathos: Ewells pathos is that he gets the courtroom riled up.
b) Ethos: Ewells ethos is that he is the father.
c) Logos: Ewells logos is that he left handed so it is logical that he did it.
3) Mayella Ewell:
a) Pathos: Mayellas pathos are that she appeals to the jury emotionally and they pity her.
b) Ethos: Mayellas ethos is that she is a reliable source when talking about her home life.
c) Logos: Mayellas logos is that it is logical that she is very lonely so that is why she would
have invited Tom into the house.
4) Tom Robinson:
a) Pathos: Toms pathos is that he is a good guy.
b) Ethos: Toms ethos is that he is a reliable source, he has nothing to hide.
c) Logos: Toms logos is that he couldn't have beaten her because his left arm is crippled.
presents a tone of authority and confidence, yet speaks in a conversational manner. Atticus
appeals to the jurys Christian sense of justice. He appeals to the sin of putting an innocent man
to death. In conclusion we can see that Atticus is great at appealing to the jury, but will that be
enough?