Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Learning Goals:
The Topics
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Lab Periods:
1. Please identify the two resources that you have selected. Print a paper copy of the primary
sources and attach them to this sheet with your highlighted research notes on them. Write the
titles and the links below:
2. PURPOSE and AUDIENCE: What do the reporters (TV, newspaper, web-based writers) wish to
communicate to the audience and why (to inform, to entertain, to persuade)? Who do you
think is the audience (age, gender, interests, education level, socio-economic status,
ethnocultural background).
RESOURCE #1
RESOURCE #2
3. MESSAGE, COMMUNICATION and BIAS: What is the central message of this web article? How
effectively has the writer communicated that message? Do you detect any bias in the article
(be specific)?
RESOURCE #1
RESOURCE #2
RESOURCE #2
Message,
Communication
and Bias (Q #3)
MS2
Understanding
Media Forms,
Conventions and
Techniques (Q
#4)
Level 4
Identified the
WHAT and WHY
of the messages
purpose & the
WHO of the
intended
audience with a
high degree of
effectiveness
Level 3
Identified the
WHAT and WHY
of the messages
purpose & the
WHO of the
intended
audience with
considerable
effectiveness
Level 2
Identified the
WHAT and WHY
of the messages
purpose & the
WHO of the
intended
audience with
some
effectiveness
Level 1
Identified the
WHAT and WHY
of the messages
purpose & the
WHO of the
intended
audience with
limited
effectiveness
R
Was not able to
identify the WHAT,
WHY or WHO of the
messages purpose or
the intended
audience with any
degree of
effectiveness
Identified the
message, the
effectiveness, and
potential bias
with a high
degree of
effectiveness
Identified
characteristics
and conventions
(reporter, set,
SFX) with a high
degree of
effectiveness
Identified the
message, the
effectiveness, and
potential bias
with considerable
effectiveness
Identified the
message, the
effectiveness, and
potential bias
with some
effectiveness
Identified the
message, the
effectiveness, and
potential bias
with limited
effectiveness
Identified
characteristics
and conventions
(reporter, set,
SFX) with
considerable
effectiveness
Identified
characteristics
and conventions
(reporter, set,
SFX) with some
effectiveness
Identified
characteristics
and conventions
(reporter, set,
SFX) with limited
effectiveness
Your ability to share what you have learned in these conversations will be evaluated using the
following rubric:
Communication
OC 1.2
*Actively listened
throughout the
discussion
*Actively listened
through most the
discussion
*Listened on occasion
*Off task
OC 2.1
*Communicates
effectively to inform
about reading
*Clearly communicates
to inform about reading
*Communication about
reading was
informative, but lacked
clarity.
*Communication about
reading lacked the
clarity to be informative
OC2.2
* Demonstrates
excellent interpersonal
speaking strategies
(manners)
*Demonstrated
effective interpersonal
speaking strategies
(manners)
*Demonstrated some
interpersonal speaking
strategies
*Interpersonal speaking
skills need more
development
OC 2.4
* Uses appropriate
literary and media
terminology to
communicate ideas
*Uses literary
terminology to
communicated ideas
OC 2.5
* Excellent use of
volume, pitch and pace
*Appropriate use of
volume, pitch and pace
*Often used
appropriate volume,
pitch and pace
*Little use of of
appropriate volume,
pitch and pace
OC 2.6
*Appropriate use of
facial expression,
gestures and eye
contact
*NB* If you are absent, your group will go on without you. Ensure that no one person in the group is in
possession of any materials that the rest of the group members might need. Harness the power of Google!
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
< Level 1
KNOWLEDGE
Understanding of
Content (explanation
of core concepts to
peers)
Explains core
concepts with some
clarity
Explains core
concepts with limited
clarity
Insufficient
evidence
Only relevant
information and good
explanations and details
are included
Some relevant
information and some
explanations details
included
Limited information
and/or limited
explanations and
details included
Insufficient
evidence
THINKING
Inclusion of relevant
and important details
Product is missing
Presentation of
product
Product contains
some elements of the
presentation vehicle
and is presented in a
somewhat organized,
neat and visually
appealing fashion
Product is missing
significant elements
of the presentation
vehicle and is
presented with
limited organization,
neatness and visual
appeal
Limited
understanding/applic
ation of non-verbal
cues
COMMUNICATION
Use of non-verbal cues
in presentation
including voice, eye
contact, posture
APPLICATION
Understanding and
adherence to group
work responsibilities
Use of structure to
enhance meaning and
message in
presentation
Positive contributor to
group work and
equally shares in the
process as well as the
presentation
Outstanding
consideration has
been made to how to
best present findings
to audience
Positive contributor to
group work and equally
shares in the process as
well as the presentation
Somewhat positive
contributor to group
work but does not
equally share in the
process as well as the
presentation
Careful consideration
has been made to how
to best present findings
to audience
Some consideration
has been made to
how to best present
findings to audience
Insufficient
evidence
Insufficient
evidence
Negative in group
work and does
equally shares in the
process and/or the
presentation
Insufficient
evidence
Limited consideration
has been made to
how to best present
findings to audience
Insufficient
evidence
After completing your presentation answer the following questions that reflect on your skills and
strategies.
1. Through completing this research assignment, what skills have you improved upon? Provide
examples to support your answer.
2. Through analysing media pieces, what have you learned?
3. Explain how viewing your peers work, allowed you to develop your listening skills.
4. Reflect on your oral communication skills. What are your strengths and weakness? Use
examples to support your idea.
5. What is one skill you would like to further develop? Explain why.
6. How has our other term work prepared you for this assignment? Explain.
Metacognitive Reflection
Checklist of Success Criteria
I have completed my presentation
I have thought about my own learning and skills
I have clearly articulated my own learning and skills
I have used examples to demonstrate my ideas
I have used complete sentences
Application
M 4.2 & OC 3.2
Interconnected
skills
M 4.1 & OC 3.1
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Metacognitive
reflection is an in
depth and
accurate reflection
of your learning
and contributions
to the assessment.
Metacognitive
reflection is an
accurate reflection
of your learning
and contributions
to the assessment.
Metacognitive
reflection needs
more examples or
details
Metacognitive
reflection is only
partially complete