Manhattan College

School Profile Analysis

Student Name: Meighan Quinn
Name of School: P.S. Robert J. Christen
Location District/County District 10
School Address:

5550 Riverdale Ave

Bronx, NY 10471

Telephone #: (718)796-8965
Student E-Mail: meighanmquinn@gmail.com

If your school is not located in the Bronx you will need to go to the NYSED.gov website and find your
schools report card.
New York City website is HYPERLINK "http://schools.nyc.gov" http://schools.nyc.gov.

Achievement
Data
NYS
Elementary
English
Language
Arts
Students
Results
Please pick
one grade to
analyze
Year

Level
Standards

1
Below
Standards

2013

Percent
# of Students
Level
Standards

16.3%
17
1
Below
Standards

Percent
# of Students

20.5%
18

Year

2014

Analysis of
ELA Data
Please indicate
the % of
students
performing
below grade
level (i.e.
levels 1 & 2).
Please
describe what
Levels 1 & 2
represents (i.e.
1 below
standards, 2
approaching
standards).
Compare the
last 2 years to

2
3
Meets Basic
Meets
Standards
Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
41.3%
32.7%
43
34
2
3
Meets Basic
Meets
Standards
Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
39.8%
33.0%
35
29

4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
9.6%
10
4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
6.8%
6

see if there is
improvement:
Levels 1 and
2 represent
the students
performing
below grade
level
standards. In
2013, more
students
scored 2s. In
2014, more
students
scored 1s. In
2013, 57% of
the grade was
performing
below grade
level and in
2014, 59% of
the grade was
performing
below grade
level.
Therefore,
the 3rd grade
did not show
progress in
ELA.

Achievement
Data
NYS
Elementary
Math
Students
Results
Please pick
one grade to
analyze
Year

Level
Standards

1
Below
Standards

2013

Percent
# of Students
Level
Standards

12.4%
13
1
Below
Standards

Percent
# of Students

11.4%
10

Year

2014
Analysis of
Math Data
Please indicate
the % of
students
performing
below grade
level (i.e.
levels 1 & 2).
Please
describe what
Levels 1 & 2
represents (i.e.
1 below
standards, 2
approaching
standards).
Compare the
last 2 years to
see if there is
improvement:

2
3
Meets Basic
Meets
Standards
Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
41.9%
19.0%
44
20
2
3
Meets Basic
Meets
Standards
Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
30.7%
30.7%
27
27

4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
26.7%
28
4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
27.3%
24

Levels 1 and
2 represent
the students
performing
below grade
level. There
were more
students who
scored 1s
and 2s in
2013 than in
2014. In 2013,
54% of the
grade was
performing
below grade.
In 2014, 42%
of the grade
was
performing
below grade
level.
Therefore
their was
progress in
3rd grade
math.

Find
Information
on Excel
Spreadsheet
s (look at
tabs on
bottom)
Overview of
School
Performance
in ELA
Results
Student
Group
All Students
Students w/
Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient
General
Education

86
52.3%
47.7%
69
52.1%
47.8%
Analysis of
ELA Data Compare
General Ed
to Students
with
Disabilities
levels on
1&2 and
also indicate
if there is a
difference
between the
groups for
past two
years Indicate if

2012-2013 2013-2014
Total #
% Levels % Levels
Tested
1-2
3-4
104
57.6%
42.3%
18
83.4%
16.7%
6

100%

0%

Total #
Tested
88
19

% Levels
1-2
60.3%
89.5%

% Levels
3-4
39.8%
10.5%

100%

0%

there was
improvemen
t:
Students
with
disabilities
who scored
1s and 2s,
increased
from one
year to the
next.
However,
the number
of General
Education
students
who scored
1s and 2s
decreased
from one
year to the
next.
Gender
Education
students
scored
more 3s
and 4s on
the test
than
Special
Education
students.

Analysis of
ELA Data Compare the

performance
of the ELL
students to
the
performance
of all
students.
Please
indicate in
your report
what Levels
1&2
indicate.
Compare the
last 2 years
to see if
there is
improvemen
t:
The
students
that
received 1s
and 2s
increased
from one
year to the
next. The
number of
ELL
students
had no
change the
next year;
they scored
1s and 2s
both years.
All students
scored
more 3s
and 4s
compared
to the ELL
students.

Find
Information
on Excel
Spreadsheet
s (look at
tabs on
bottom)
Overview of
School
Performance
in Math
Results
2012-2013 2013-2014
Student
Total #
% Levels % Levels
Group
Tested
1-2
3-4
All Students
105
54.3%
60.9%
Students w/
18
80.3%
16.7%
Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient
General
Education

87
48.2%
51.7%
69
42%
71%
Analysis of
Math Data Compare
General Ed
to Students
with
Disabilities

87.5%

12.5%

Total #
Tested
88
19

% Levels
1-2
42.1%
89.5%

% Levels
3-4
61.4%
10.5%

44.4%

55.6%

levels 1&2
and also
indicate if
there is a
difference
between the
groups for
past two
years Indicate if
there was
improvemen
t:
Students
with
disabilities
who scored
1s and 2s
increased
from one
year to the
next.
However,
the number
of General
Education
students
who scored
1s and 2s
decreased
from one
year to the
next.
General
Education
students
scored
more 3s
and 4s on
the test
than special
education
students.

Analysis of
Math Data Compare the
performance
of the ELL
students to
the
performance
of all
students.
Please
indicate in
your report
what Levels
1&2
indicate.
Compare the
last 2 years
to see if
there is
improvemen
t:
Students
that scored
1s and 2s,
decreased
from one
year to the
next. The
number of
ELL
students
that
received 1s
and 2s
dramaticall
y decreased
from one
year to the
next. All
students
scored
more 3s
and 4s
compared

to the
group of
ELL
students.

Find the
information on
the School
Report Card
www.nysed.go
v
Demographics
Year
Eligible for Reduced Price
Free Lunch
Lunch
2011

44%

#278

12%

#75

Limited
English
Proficient
11%
#73

2012

38%

#238

14%

#88

10%

Analysis of
Data Indicate
any or no
changes over
the two years:
Less students
are eligible
for free lunch
in 2012 than
in 2011. More
students are
eligible for

Student
Stability

#65

Notes

reduced
lunch in 2012.
This could be
a result of
more
working
parents.
There are less
limited
English
proficient
students in
2012 than in
2011. This
could be
because less
people came
into the
country that
year.
Racial/Ethnic
Origin
Year

American Indian/ Black or African

Alaska Native
American

Hispanic or
Latino

Asian or Native
Hawaiian/ Other
Pacific Islander

White

2011

1%

#5

11%

#68

46% #291

13%

#81

30%

#188

2012

1%

#4

10%

#62

47% #295

11%

#70

30%

#185

Analysis of
Data
Indicate any or
no changes
over the two
years:
The
percentage of
American
Indian/Alask
a Native
students had
no changes
from 2011 to
2012. The
percentage of
African

American
slightly
decreased
from 2011 to
2012. The
percentage of
Hispanic/His
panic
students
increased
from 2011 to
2012. The
percentage of
Asian/Hawaii
an/ Other
Pacific
Islander
students
decreased
from 2011 to
2012. The
percentage of
White
students had
no change
from 2011 to
2012.
Attendance &
Suspensions
Year
Attendance % Suspensions
2010-2011
94%
2%
#
#16
2011-2012
Analysis of
Data
Indicate any or
no changes
over the two
years
The
attendance
increased
from 2010-

95%
#

0%
#1

Notes

2011 to 20112012. The

suspensions
decreased
over the two
school years.

PAGE
PAGE 6