Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
In the 1980s being LGBTQIA was dangerous.One felt scorn and outright hatred coming
from everywhere, family, clergy, the government, peers. This prevalent malice was amplified
even more during that time because of the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. Imagine being told
that your existence was an abomination, your friends, and loved ones deserved to die a painful
death, and there being legislation to prove it. My vivid recollections are of the government, the
helping professions, and schools, whole communities condoning the worst possible treatment of
masses of dying people because most of them were gay men, and they deserved it. There are
people out there that still feel that way.
In the United States being identified as gay, particularly for men, was and in many places
still is very dangerous. Being gay or lesbian or queer was against the law everywhere in the U.S.
If it was not for the Supreme Courts decision only 11 short years ago it would still be illegal in
several states. Unfortunately, acceptance cannot be legislated. For safety, the LGBTQIA
community had to stay underground. Individuals needed to stay closeted because of the vicious
stereotypes propagated by the dominant heterosexual group. The stereotypes made LGBTQIA
people targets. Gay people were and are still seen by some people to be evil, possessed,
pedophiles, sick, mentally ill, or deviants. Stereotypes for lesbians include that they are mentally
ill, developmentally stunted, man haters that are too ugly to get a man, or all they need is a good
man to be cured. This animosity and the othering of homosexuals created an us versus them
atmosphere. The positive of the division was that it created a diverse, creative, and supportive
LGBTQIA community.
Because of the underground subculture created by the community one had to search to
find gathering places, bars, community centers, and groups to socialize with other like people,
but they existed. Unfortunately, other people that were malevolent eventually found these places
too which meant that these places were not completely safe, not really. In many places, they still
are unsafe. There are people who actively seek out gatherings of LGBTQ people for the specific
intent to do us harm, hunters in search of prey.
It may be hard for some to imagine, at least in this country, that their favorite pub would
need to close for renovations due to the Molotov cocktails thrown at its door. This incident
happened in the late 80s at a club in New Jersey I frequented called Feathers. Certainly at 20 I
was unprepared for the man who walked into the Red Lantern, a club I only visited one time,
who pulled a hammer from his jacket and started hitting the patrons with it, seriously injuring
several. Rocks, bottles, and, spray paint were common projectiles and irritants, but they were not
the most dangerous. Sometimes things got physical, and sometimes that happened in the places
that were supposed to be safe, like a friend who was beaten with golf clubs in the East Village in
the early 90s. Gay Pride celebrations were mostly safe but sometimes not. Violence and protests
were common.
Being identified as a lesbian was dangerous, but as mentioned previously not as
dangerous as it was for gay men. Gay male friends experienced much more physical violence
than lesbian friends. It was and is certainly an instance where being a woman is a benefit. Sadly
violence happened and still does toward lesbians, both for being lesbians and frankly for lesbians
being women. That is another story.
My first girlfriend outed me in high school. That set in motion a string of instances that
made the already unpleasant high school experience exponentially worse. Being pushed into and
against lockers, having rocks being thrown at my car even with my Mom in it, and a litany of
insulting and disparaging names became regular occurrences, both on and off campus. Though I
passed for being just another girl most of the time, an upside of being invisible, there were a
couple of times where I was recognized for who I was, really, and targeted. Bottles and slurs
were hurled in my direction on more than a few occasions. The worst hurdles that I had to
contend which were not from my peers; they were from the teachers. Being outed caused several
teachers, even the obviously gay ones, to shun me. The people who could have helped the most
did the most damage. Things improved over time and change of location, but not until much
later.
My experiences in high school made going to college terrifying. I had become so scared
of teachers and classmates and their reactions to me, being the freak that I am, that going to
school made me physically ill. After a couple of semesters of miserable grades, because I never
went to class, I gave up and dropped out. Time, distance, and new experiences helped me process
the trauma of my school days. The mid 90s arrived, and some progress had been made in public
opinion. Shockingly or perhaps counterintuitively my experiences of aggression, prejudice, and
discrimination for being lesbian decreased dramatically once I moved to Georgia. Of course
being a lesbian is only a part of my experience.
Being a woman is extraordinary. Being a 54 woman who works at The Home Depot is
an exercise in patience rarely seen in other humans. The Home Depot, THD for the initiated, is a
home improvement store that also caters to contractors. Painters, plumbers, electricians,
carpenters, and other tradesmen frequent the stores. A good percentage of the male contractors
are blatantly, expressively, and unapologetically chauvinist. An outside observer could glean
their attitudes in a moment simply by listening to the torrent of honey, baby, sweetie, darlin,
sugar monikers they use when interacting with us although our names are clearly printed on our
aprons. They are dismissive and condescending to any offer of assistance by a female. There
have been times when I have been deemed worthy to assist one of these men only to have a male
peer come into view and be summarily dismissed, sometimes without comment.
What is mind boggling is how assuming these men are of their place in their perceived
hierarchy and what are deemed appropriate or inappropriate tasks for their gender. The
electrician who works with schematics and all sorts of technology will approach the female
working at the Self-Checkout stand, arm outstretched, with a package of wire nuts pinched
between and dangling from his index finger and thumb. He will stop with this package and his
hand about 4 inches from the female cashiers face and say check me out. This act of
condescension is a daily occurrence for every woman I have seen work as a cashier at The Home
Depot. I have had this experience happen unnervingly often. I never have, not once, seen it
happen to a man working as a cashier.
There are other examples of patriarchy in my life. Im certain of it. Most have not
impacted me in enough of a way to register on my oppression radar as more than an occasional
blip, other than pay discrepancy. The concept of patriarchy is apparent in the world. Its impact is
more palpable to friends and family and, in my opinion, heterosexual women than my
experience. With patriarchy men are dominant and women are targeted. With heterosexism
heterosexuals are dominant and LGBTQIA people are targeted. However, women are targeted
less than the men in LGBTQIA groups. That has buffered the discomfort of patriarchy for me
and perhaps others. Patriarchy is not my prominent pain; heterosexism is. The dominant pain
gets the most attention. The least targeted and painful of my targeted groups is also the most
easily hidden.
For some religion is an apparent and outward expression. Clothing, hair, and jewelry
make a statement about an individuals beliefs. For some religions, an outward expression is a
key aspect of their religion. Crucifixes, Yamakas, or other religious garb or symbols are worn as
part of religious practice or simply to proclaim ones faith. Buddhism, unless one is a nun or
monk, is not one of those belief systems. I am not targeted for not being a Christian, at least not
directly. Unless His Holiness, the Dalai Lama is in the news Buddhism is translucent if not
invisible. His Holiness, the Dalai Lama, is such a beloved figure across cultures that although
Buddhism is misunderstood in the U.S. it is not generally the target of hatred. It is seen as
benign. I come out as a lesbian far more readily than I do as a Buddhist simply due to time
constraints and the need for visibility.
I have answered the most ridiculous and ignorant questions from others pertaining to my
sexuality and my relationships. Education, information, and conversation dispel stereotypes,
foster goodwill and make the world a safer place. Those questions, the sexuality questions, have
finite and factual answers. Discussing religion involves time and philosophy and detailed,
cautious explanations, particularly because I am not what one usually pictures when they think
Buddhist. Discussing religion, particularly a non-dominant if not targeted religion, is treacherous
because it calls into question belief systems. People dont generally like their beliefs questioned.
Wars start that way. In this country, religions are like sports teams. Mine is better than yours. A
more damaging stance is the infamous Im right and you are wrong and therefore going to hell,
and I can treat you like garbage because my G-d hates you. People have tried to convert me or
heal me. People have also told me that I am a heathen and am going to hell. Thankfully, the
negative repercussions of my philosophy are few and far between. I am fortunate that I can pick
and choose many of my battles.
Along with being a lesbian and a Buddhist, I am also White, able-bodied, and not poor,
well not destitute. I have food and clothing and shelter. I have cognition and friends and a
supportive, though dysfunctional, family. I am very lucky. My dominant group affiliations far
outstrip my targeted group affiliations. Im not followed around grocery stores. People do not
joke about my language. I am assumed to be many things that I am not because of my skin color
just as others are assumed to be something else because of their skin. The difference is that the
assumptions about me, for the most part, are deemed positive. Reverse prejudice exists and is
more shocking and hurtful than prejudice from dominant groups. I have been called disparaging