Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

20.

WEARING COAT
21. EXPANSION J OINTS AS PER M.O.R.T. &H. STANDARDS.
R.C.C. WEARING COAT AS PER M.O.R.T.&H STD. DRG.
R.C.C. BOX TYPE M : 25
OPEN FOUNDATION
RAILING AS PER STD. DRG. 33R OF SETU NIGAM 19. RAILING
13. DESIGN VELOCITY
15. TYPE OF SUB-STRUCTURE
16. TYPE OF SUPER -STRUCTURE
14. TYPE OF FOUNDATION
17. TYPE OF BEARING
A) PIER
12. DESIGN DISCHARGE
8. L.W.L.
2.252 M/Sec
R.C.C. WALL TYPE PIER M : 25
R.C.C. SOLID SLAB M : 25.
ELASTOMERIC BEARING
R.L. 96.300 M.
415.75 CUMEC
NOTES :-
1. TYPE OF BRIDGE
2. LENGTH OF BRIDGE
6. SOFFIT LEVEL
5. FORMATION LEVEL
HIGH LEVEL BRIDGE
R.L. 102.725 M.
R.L. 101.850 M.
B) ABUTMENT
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
45.00 MTS. (3 SPAN @ 15.00 MTS. C/C EACH .)
9. H.F.L.
10. S.B.C. 50.00 T/Sqm (ASSUMED)
3. OVER ALL WIDTH
4. CLEAR CARRIAGE WAY
8.40 M.
7.50 M.
:
:
: R.L. 100.500 M.
:- 42.50 SQKM. 11. CATCHMENT AREA
18. FOUNDATION LEVEL / STRATA
A. ABUTMENT : R.L. 90.000 M.
B. PIER : R.L. 90.000 M.
7. O.F.L. R.L. 99.800 M. :
AS PER M.O.R.T. &H. &IRC SPECIFICATIONS
LANE WHICH EVER PRODUCES SEVERE EFFECT.
IRC CLASS AA ONE LANE / 70R OR IRC CLASS A TWO
25. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM &R.L. ARE IN Mtr.
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
24. SEISMIC ZONE &
23. DESIGN LOADING
22. SPECIFICATIONS
ZONE II; IMPORTANCE FACTOR ONE.
26. DIMENSIONS OF DIFFERENT ELEMENTS AND FOUNDATION LEVELS ETC.
INDICATED IN THIS DRAWING ARE TENTATIVE AND
FOR ESTIMATE PURPOSE ONLY THIS MAY VARY AFTER
DETAILED INVESTIGATION / DESIGN.
27. PROVISION OF PROTECTION WORK UP TO SPREAD OF HFL SHALL BE
MADE IN ESTIMATE AS PER REQUIREMENT OF SITE CONDITION.
28. CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED UP TO 5 M. BEYOND THE POINT WHERE HFL
CUT THE G.L. AND BEYOND THAT FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT MAY BE PROVIDED.
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING
HIGH LEVEL BRIDGE
ACROSS KHAL NALLA ON BHAWAGARH
NANDBEL ROAD IN KM. 2/2
Drn- by. Priyman Drafting Hub Bhopal MOB. 9926859830
FORMATION LVL.
R.L. 102.725M.
SOFFIT LVL.
R.L. 101.850M.
75mmWEARING COAT
TOTAL LENGTH OF BRIDGE BETWEEN FACE OF DIRT WALLS
45.00 MTS. (3 SPAN @ 15.00 MTS. C/C EACH)
BHAWGARH SIDE
NANDBEL SIDE
P2
H.F.L.
R.L. 100.500M.
6000
A1 A2
6000
P1
FOUNDATION LVL.
R.L. 92.700M.
FOUNDATION LVL.
R.L. 92.700M.
FOUNDATION LVL.
R.L. 92.700M.
15000 15000 15000
CHAINAGE
GROUND
LEVEL IN M.
IN M.
ELEVATION OF BRIDGE
6
0
.
0
0
9
9
.
8
8
0
5
0
.
0
0
9
9
.
9
5
0
4
0
.
0
0
9
9
.
1
4
0
3
0
.
0
0
9
8
.
9
8
0
2
0
.
0
0
9
8
.
8
0
0
1
0
.
0
0
9
7
.
7
7
0
0
0
.
0
0
9
6
.
1
9
0
7
0
.
0
0
1
0
2
.
2
5
0
6
0
.
0
0
1
0
1
.
8
3
0
5
0
.
0
0
1
0
1
.
0
9
0
4
0
.
0
0
1
0
0
.
6
6
0
3
0
.
0
0
9
9
.
9
3
0
2
0
.
0
0
9
9
.
3
6
0
1
0
.
0
0
9
6
.
0
9
0
0
5
.
0
0
9
6
.
2
3
0
1
5
.
0
0
9
9
.
1
5
0
2
5
.
0
0
FOUNDATION LVL.
R.L. 92.700M.
LWL. R.L. 96.300M.
FRONT WALL
150 MM AV. THK. R.C.C. LEVELLING
COURSE IN C.C.M:10
R.C.C. CHAIR
FORMATION LVL.
SOFFIT LVL.
ELASTOMERIC BEARING
R.C.C. ABUTMENT CAP
R.L. 102.725 M.
R.L. 101.850 M.
6000
INNER
WALL
INNER
WALL
REAR
WALL
SECTIONAL OF ABUTMENT
PLAN OF ABUTMENT
SIDE
WALL
R.L. 92.700 M.
FRONT
WALL
4
0
0
2800
300 300 300
300
3
0
0
COMPACTEDGRANULAR FILLING
AS PER M.O.S.T. SPECIFICATION
350
2800
8
4
0
0
2
4
0
0
2
4
0
0
2
4
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
REAR
WALL
SIDE
WALL
DIRT
WALL
2800
300 300 300
2800
500
7000
ELASTOMERIC BEARING
R.C.C. CHAIR
R.C.C. PIER CAP
R.C.C. WALL TYPE PIER
C.L. OF PIER
R.C.C. FOOTING
7000
FORMATION LEVEL
OVERALL WIDTH 8400
CARRIAGEWAY 7500
R.L. 92.700M.
TYP. PLAN OF PIER FOOTING
SECTION @ A-A
R.L. 101.850M.
R.L. 102.725M.
100 100
SECTION @ B-B
800
R.C.C. FOOTING
W.C. IN C.C.M:30
75 MM . THK. R.C.C. C.L. OF ROADWAY
A A
B
B
450 450
4
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
500
R.C.C. WALL
TYPE PIER
3200
150MM THK. LEVELLING
COURSE IN C.C.M:10
6000
6300
1550
8
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
2
0
0
7000
500
SOFFIT LEVEL
R.L. 101.850M.
5
0
0
5
0
0

Potrebbero piacerti anche