Name of Rater:

Position:
Date of Review:
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
1. Teaching-Learning Incorporated ICT in teaching-learning process year round 30% 5 - if ICT is always incorporated in classroom instruction
Process 4 - if ICT is most oftenly incorporated in classroom instruction
3 - if ICT is often incorporated in classroom instruction
2 - if ICT is seldom incorporated in classroom instruction
1 - if ICT is not at all incorporated in classroom instruction
Prepared DIP's including appropriate year round 30% 5 - all DIP's had all the 5 complete parts
instructional materials within the rating period 4 - all DIP's had 4 of the 5 parts
3 - all DIP's had 3 of the 5 parts
2 - all DIP's had 2 of the 5 parts
1 - all DIP's had 1 of the 5 parts
Supervised curricular and co-curricular projects year round 30% 5 - 130% and above of the students aided and supervised
to aid students in their academic and in their curricular and co -curricular activities
non-academic performance 4 - 115 % - 129 % of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
3 - 100 % - 114 % of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
2 - 51 % - 99 % of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
3 - 50 % and below of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
Counselled and guided the students in their year round 30% 5 - all counselled and guided students improved positively
behavioral and academic problems such in their behavioral and academic performances
as absenteeism, tardiness,and cutting classes 4 - 90% of counselled and guided students improved positively
in their behavioral and academic performances
3 - 85% of counselled and guided students improved positively
in their behavioral and academic performances
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
RATING
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weigh per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
2 - 75% of counselled and guided students improved positively
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE RATING
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
SCORE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
Teaching-Learning Incorporated ICT in teaching-learning process year round 30% 5 - if ICT is always incorporated in classroom instruction
Process 4 - if ICT is most oftenly incorporated in classroom instruction
3 - if ICT is often incorporated in classroom instruction
2 - if ICT is seldom incorporated in classroom instruction
1 - if ICT is not at all incorporated in classroom instruction
Prepared DIP's including appropriate year round 30% 5 - all DIP's had all the 5 complete parts
instructional materials within the rating period 4 - all DIP's had 4 of the 5 parts
3 - all DIP's had 3 of the 5 parts
2 - all DIP's had 2 of the 5 parts
1 - all DIP's had 1 of the 5 parts
Supervised curricular and co-curricular projects year round 30% 5 - 130% and above of the students aided and supervised
to aid students in their academic and in their curricular and co -curricular activities
non-academic performance 4 - 115 % - 129 % of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
3 - 100 % - 114 % of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
2 - 51 % - 99 % of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
3 - 50 % and below of the students aided and supervised
in their curricular and co -curricular activities
Counselled and guided the students in their year round 30% 5 - all counselled and guided students improved positively
behavioral and academic problems such in their behavioral and academic performances
as absenteeism, tardiness,and cutting classes 4 - 90% of counselled and guided students improved positively
in their behavioral and academic performances
3 - 85% of counselled and guided students improved positively
in their behavioral and academic performances
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE RATING SCORE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
2 - 75% of counselled and guided students improved positively
in their behavioral and academic performances
1 - 50% of counselled and guided students did not improve
in their behavioral and academic performances
Maintained a conducive learning environment year round 30% 5 - if 130% and above of classroom conduciveness consistently
maintained
4 - if 115% - 129% of classroom conduciveness frequently
maintained
3 - if 100% - 114% of classroom conduciveness moderately
maintained
2 - if 51% to 99 % of classroom conduciveness poorly maintained
maintained
1 - if 50% and below of classroom conduciveness hardly
maintained
2. Student Outcomes Prepared accurate and updated records year round 40% 5 - 130 % and above of the students' accurate and updated
of students' performances record prepared
4 - 115% - 129 of the students' accurate and updated record
prepared
3 - 100% - 114% of the students' accurate and updated record
prepared
2 - 51% - 99% of the students' accurate and updated record
prepared
1 - 50% and below of the students' accurate and updated
record prepared
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE RATING SCORE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
Adapted appropriate intervention Year Round A. Achievement Rate
programs to improve performance indicators 5- 130% and above of the students' achievement level improved
4- 115-129% of the students' achievement level improved
3- 100-114% of the students' achievement level improved
2-51-99% of the students' achievement level improved
1-50 and below of the students' achievement level improved
B. Dropped Out Rate
5- 100% of the students promoted
4- 80% of the students promoted
3- 70% of the students promoted
2- 60% of the students promoted
1- 50% of the students promoted
C. Retention Rate
5- 100% of the students completed the curriculum year
4- 80% of the students completed the curriculum year
3- 70% of the students completed the curriculum year
2- 60% of the students completed the curriculum year
1- 50% of the students completed the curriculum year
Adapted strategies to address needs of Year Round 5- 100% of the differently abled students benefited the adapted
differently abled students strategies
4- 80% of the differently abled students benefited the adapted
strategies
3- 70% of the differently abled students benefited the adapted
strategies
2- 60% of the differently abled students benefited the adapted
strategies
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE RATING SCORE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
1- 50% of the differently abled students benefited the adapted
strategies
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
Conducted regular meetings with learners Year Round 5- 130% and above of the objectives for regular meetings
and parents to report learners' progress of learners with parents achieved
4- 115-129% of the objectives for regular meetings of
learners with parents achieved
3- 100-114% of the objectives for regular meetings of leaners
with parents achieved
2- 51-99% of the objectives for regular meetings of learners
with parents achieved
1- 50 and below of the objectives for regular meetings of learners
with parents achieved
Community Utilized available community resources to Year Round 5- if 130% and above of available community resources utilized
Involvement facilitate learning 4- if 115-129 of available community resources utilized
3- if 100-114% of available community resources utilized
2- if 51-99% of available community resources utilized
1- if 1-50% of available community resources utilized
Acted as efficient counselor in government and 5- if 130% and above of government and non-government activities
non government programs relative to acted and documented
behavior problems among students 4- if 115-129% of government and non-government activities
acted and documented
Documented worthwhile community 3- if 100-114%% of government and non-government activities
programs sponsored by government and acted and documented
non-government organization 2- if 51-99% of government and non-government activities
for future reference acted and documented
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE RATING SCORE
Position:
Review Period:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
1- if 1-50% of government and non-government activities
acted and documented
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
Served as resource person/consultant in 5- Shared expertise in 100% of the community trainings
community trainings 4- Shared expertise in 80% of the community trainings
3- Shared expertise in 70% of the community trainings
2- Shared expertise in 60% of the community trainings
1- Shared expertise in 50% of the community trainings
Professional Growth Enrolled in Graduate Studies 5- enrolled atleast 18 units
and Development 4- enrolled 1atleast 5 units
3- enrolled atleast 12 units
2- enrolled atleast 9 units
1- not enrolled in Graduate Studies
Professional Ethics Sustained harmonious relationship among 5-130% and above of set objectives of regular assembly among
internal and external stakeholders internal and external stakeholders achieved
through regular assembly 4-115 - 129% of set objectives of regular assembly among
internal and external stakeholders achieved
3-100-114% of set objectives of regular assembly among
internal and external stakeholders achieved
2-51-99% of set objectives of regular assembly among
internal and external stakeholders achieved
1-50% and below of set objectives of regular assembly among
internal and external stakeholders achieved
MFOS KRAs TIMELINE RATING SCORE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Weigh per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULT
MFOS KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION