0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
42 visualizzazioni15 pagine
In the early months of 2014, conflicts arose around the Black Sea between two nations: the Russian Federation and Ukraine. After the people of Crimea revolted against their government, Russia saw this as the justification needed to intervene in Ukraine’s internal conflicts. A highly debatable topic, the annexation of Russia by Crimea contains plenty of gray areas for morality and justice. It is a conflict of the law versus the interest of the people. Multiple international entities have viewed this in a variety of ways, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO viewing it as illegal and how certain countries view it as a justified move by Russia. This issue of security and war in the 21st century has raised questions that challenge certain aspects of the world. Should international law really be absolute? What makes foreign intervention justified? Is it moral for a country to intervene into another country’s affairs? Is there equality in the treatment of international law?
Titolo originale
A Position Paper on the Justification of The Annexation of Crimea by Russia
In the early months of 2014, conflicts arose around the Black Sea between two nations: the Russian Federation and Ukraine. After the people of Crimea revolted against their government, Russia saw this as the justification needed to intervene in Ukraine’s internal conflicts. A highly debatable topic, the annexation of Russia by Crimea contains plenty of gray areas for morality and justice. It is a conflict of the law versus the interest of the people. Multiple international entities have viewed this in a variety of ways, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO viewing it as illegal and how certain countries view it as a justified move by Russia. This issue of security and war in the 21st century has raised questions that challenge certain aspects of the world. Should international law really be absolute? What makes foreign intervention justified? Is it moral for a country to intervene into another country’s affairs? Is there equality in the treatment of international law?
In the early months of 2014, conflicts arose around the Black Sea between two nations: the Russian Federation and Ukraine. After the people of Crimea revolted against their government, Russia saw this as the justification needed to intervene in Ukraine’s internal conflicts. A highly debatable topic, the annexation of Russia by Crimea contains plenty of gray areas for morality and justice. It is a conflict of the law versus the interest of the people. Multiple international entities have viewed this in a variety of ways, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO viewing it as illegal and how certain countries view it as a justified move by Russia. This issue of security and war in the 21st century has raised questions that challenge certain aspects of the world. Should international law really be absolute? What makes foreign intervention justified? Is it moral for a country to intervene into another country’s affairs? Is there equality in the treatment of international law?