0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
66 visualizzazioni3 pagine
Subtle gender bias persists in modern workplaces and continues to impede women's advancement. This "second-generation gender bias" is more covert than explicit discrimination of the past. It stems from masculine work cultures and practices that appear neutral but favor stereotypically male leadership styles and priorities. Common dynamics driving this subtle bias include double standards for how women and men leaders are expected to act, bias against women who take time off for family responsibilities, and gender stereotypes that influence how women are perceived. Lack of influential networks and sponsors for women also contributes to their underrepresentation in leadership. Measures like training, calling out bias, encouraging women to pursue leadership roles, and increasing transparency in evaluations can help reduce this subtle
Subtle gender bias persists in modern workplaces and continues to impede women's advancement. This "second-generation gender bias" is more covert than explicit discrimination of the past. It stems from masculine work cultures and practices that appear neutral but favor stereotypically male leadership styles and priorities. Common dynamics driving this subtle bias include double standards for how women and men leaders are expected to act, bias against women who take time off for family responsibilities, and gender stereotypes that influence how women are perceived. Lack of influential networks and sponsors for women also contributes to their underrepresentation in leadership. Measures like training, calling out bias, encouraging women to pursue leadership roles, and increasing transparency in evaluations can help reduce this subtle
Subtle gender bias persists in modern workplaces and continues to impede women's advancement. This "second-generation gender bias" is more covert than explicit discrimination of the past. It stems from masculine work cultures and practices that appear neutral but favor stereotypically male leadership styles and priorities. Common dynamics driving this subtle bias include double standards for how women and men leaders are expected to act, bias against women who take time off for family responsibilities, and gender stereotypes that influence how women are perceived. Lack of influential networks and sponsors for women also contributes to their underrepresentation in leadership. Measures like training, calling out bias, encouraging women to pursue leadership roles, and increasing transparency in evaluations can help reduce this subtle
No! Gender bias and glass ceiling effect is not a thing of the past.
The modern workplace
woman is still faced with subtle gender bias that persists in organizations. Traditional methods like mentoring and leadership development programs are in place in most organizations but they are still not sufficient. In this regard, what in your opinion is the reason for the existence of this subtle gender bias, called the second-generation Gender Bias in the article?
Unlike first generation gender discrimination (intentional acts of bias against women), women in today's workforce, especially those working in traditionally male-dominated fields experience a much more camouflaged second generation gender bias that impedes their advancement. Work cultures and practices appear neutral and natural on the face, yet they reflect masculine values and male dominance. There are uncountable reasons or dynamics for its existence; some of them which I feel as most dominant are listed below Double-blinds One common dynamic is the way in which leadership tends to be judged in the workplace. "Good" leaders are expected to be self-confident, strong, confident, and assertive. Yet, when women act strong, confident, and assertive, they're often perceived and judged as arrogant, abrasive, uncaring, self-promoting, and aggressive. Women in positions of authority who enact a conventionally feminine style may be liked but are not respected. When they act in more collaborative ways, they're viewed as not possessing "good" leadership skills. They are deemed too emotional to make tough decisions and too soft to be strong leaders. Work-life balance Most businesses have policies to be sensitive to work/life balance issues (paid family leaves, flex schedules etc.). However, favor is still shown to those workers whose work habits encapsulate as an "ideal worker" i.e. someone who puts work before family, works long hours, and doesn't take much time off for personal matters. As most women are still primarily responsible for child care, family care, and home care, the edge often goes to males who don't typically assume these type of responsibilities. Gender-stereotype It is "false representation or misrepresentation of reality based on gender that unconsciously govern our thoughts and actions." Gender stereotypes can have a powerful influence over the way women are viewed by their colleagues, both male and female. E.g. women are typically viewed as having better "taking care" skills (supportive, encouraging) whereas men are generally viewed as having better "take charge" skills (problem-solving, assertiveness, influence). Comeback Women who leave work after having a child sometimes tend to off-ramp far longer and have less success in finding a job when theyre ready to go back to work. Post-recession, fewer mothers who left the workforce are having an even tougher time getting back in. Bias against working mothers is generally more extreme than bias against working fathers. Men are more likely than women to face penalties if they take parental leave or flex-time benefits. Lack of networks and sponsors Informal networks are a precious resource for would-be leaders, yet differences in mens and womens organizational roles, career prospects, and proclivity to interact with others of the same gender, result in weaker networks for women especially lack of influential colleagues or efficacious connections. Mens networks provide more informal help than womens do, and men are more likely to have mentors who help them get promoted. Meanwhile, men in positions of power tend to direct developmental opportunities to junior men, whom they view as more likely than women to succeed.
Also, suggest suitable measures to reduce this bias and improve womens access to leadership positions in the organizational hierarchy.
Getting into a leadership role involves a fundamental identity shift. Internalizing a sense of oneself as a leader is an iterative process. A person asserts leadership by taking purposeful action. Others affirm or resist the action, thus encouraging or discouraging subsequent assertions. These interactions demonstrate the persons leadership as viewed by self and others. Below are the key measures to reduce gender bias and improve womens access to leadership roles Awareness and Training The first step to short-circuiting these invisible barriers is knowledge and awareness. As second generation gender biases are largely invisible, there are misperceptions that gender bias doesnt even exist. Workplace education and training can go a long way in helping coworkers and bosses understand the new face of gender bias and its differential impact on men's and women's careers. When women recognize the subtle and pervasive effects of second-generation bias, they feel empowered, not victimized, because they can take action to counter those effects. Calling attention Calling attention to gender bias when it occurs can sometimes be an effective tool for reducing or eliminating it. In some instances, there may be backlash, but the alternative is to prolong the life of something that should have died long ago. In addition, some instances of gender bias are unintentional and unrecognized by the perpetrator. By calling attention to what is happening when it happens, the perpetrator will either learn from it or at least may think twice before doing it again, recognizing that you're not going to silently stand by and let it continue. Lean-in Women should put themselves forward for leadership roles when they are qualified but overlooked. They can seek out sponsors and networks to support them in those roles. They can negotiate for work arrangements that fit both their lives and their organizations performance requirements. In short they must lean in. Transparency Companies should provide clear criteria for developmental assignments, be transparent about how high potential is evaluated, and give direction as to what experiences best increase a persons potential. Such transparencies would put more women in leadership roles. 360 degree evaluations discovered that women are rated higher in fully 12 of the 16 competencies that go into outstanding leadership. Women are gaining speed globally where the race for talent is tight. Female leaders are better than their male peers on traits like empathy, influence, and conflict management, and are self-aware. Strategic alliances can make or break female leaders.
As more and more women move into upper level management and executive positions despite the odds against them, these gender-biased perceptions and workplace practices should begin to slowly disappear. The next generation is termed as children of the gender revolution that hold high hopes for a world unrestricted by rigid gender roles. Hopefully, the unique qualities of women will no longer be devalued and punished, but instead will be respected and embraced.
Leadership is a Responsibility: How to Become an Inclusive Leader in the Modern Workplace by Understanding the Lived Experiences of Black Women and Afro-Latinas at Work
Determining The Distance Learning Educational Atmosphere Factors On The Attitude Toward Mathematics Teaching-Learning Processes During The COVID-19 Pandemic Using Hybrid SEM-ANN
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal