The Future of Project Management 56 7('*+8 9&':$&'1 ;<3=3 Sr. Lxecuuve ulrecLor for ro[ecL ManagemenL lnLernauonal lnsuLuLe for Learnlng, lnc. lor more Lhan y years, pro[ecL managemenL has been ln use buL perhaps noL on a world-wlde basls. WhaL dlerenuaLed companles ln Lhe early years was wheLher or noL Lhey used pro[ecL managemenL, noL how well Lhey used lL. 1oday, almosL every company uses pro[ecL managemenL and Lhe dlerenuauon ls wheLher Lhey are slmply good aL pro[ecL managemenL or wheLher Lhey Lruly excel aL pro[ecL managemenL. 1he dlerence beLween uslng pro[ecL managemenL and belng good aL pro[ecL managemenL ls relauvely small and mosL companles can become good aL pro[ecL managemenL ln a relauvely shorL ume perlod especlally lf Lhey have execuuve-level supporL. 8uL Lhe dlerence beLween belng good and excelllng aL pro[ecL managemenL ls qulLe large. Companles such as l8M, Mlcroso, Slemens, Pewleu- ackard and uelolue, [usL Lo name a few, have come Lo Lhe reallzauon LhaL Lhey musL excel aL pro[ecL managemenL. l8M has more Lhan 300,000 employees wlLh more LhaL 70 percenL ouLslde of Lhe unlLed SLaLes. 1hls lncludes some 20,000 pro[ecL managers. Pewleu-ackard (P) has more Lhan 8000 pro[ecL managers and 3300 Ms. P deslres 8000 pro[ecL managers and 8000 Ms. xecunves chonqe their view of the lmportonce of Project Monoqement 1he companles menuoned prevlously are performlng sLraLeglc plannlng for pro[ecL managemenL and are focuslng heavlly on Lhe fuLure. Several of Lhe Lhlngs LhaL Lhese companles are dolng wlll be dlscussed ln Lhls paper, beglnnlng wlLh senlor managemenL's vlslon of Lhe fuLure. ?ears ago, senlor managemenL provlde llp servlce Lo pro[ecL managemenL. 1oday, senlor managemenL malnLalns a dlerenL vlew of pro[ecL managemenL as seen ln Lhe Lable below: xcu1lv vlw Ol PkOlc1 M4N46MN1 ro[ecL managemenL ls no longer regarded as a parL- ume occupauon or even a career paLh posluon. lL ls now vlewed as a sLraLeglc compeLency needed for Lhe survlval of Lhe rm. Superlor pro[ecL managemenL capablllLy !"# %&'( )'( %&'( ro[ecL managemenL ls a career paLh ro[ecL managemenL ls a sLraLeglc or core compeLency We need our people cerLlfled as a M > We need people cerLlfled ln pro[ecL managemenL and ln buslness processes (cerLlflcaLlon boards) ?-' Ms $&&8 %'(8)%)*$(+ organlzaLlonal behavlor Lralnlng We need speclallzed organlzaLlonal behavlor Lralnlng Lxecuuves Change Lhelr vlew of Lhe lmporLance of ro[ecL Man- agemenL LngagemenL ro[ecL ManagemenL Managlng nonLradluonal ro[ecLs new uevelopmenLs ln ro[ecL ManagemenL ! #$%&'$(%) *$(+ #$,%) %-%& .*' /&('$) $01 #$23 @ can make Lhe dlerence beLween wlnnlng and loslng a conLracL. 1o lllusLraLe how lmporLanL pro[ecL ls Lo cusLomers, conslder Lhe followlng four requlremenLs LhaL now appear ln requesLs for proposals (8ls): - Show us Lhe number of Ms ln your company and ldenufy whlch M wlll manage Lhls conLracL lf you are Lhe wlnner Lhrough compeuuve blddlng - Show us LhaL you have an enLerprlse pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology LhaL has a hlsLory of provldlng repeaLed successes - Show us Lhe maLurlLy level of pro[ecL managemenL ln your company and ldenufy whlch pro[ecL managemenL maLurlLy model you used Lo perform Lhe assessmenL - Show us LhaL you have a besL pracuces llbrary for pro[ecL managemenL and your wllllngness Lo share Lhls knowledge wlLh us as well as Lhe besL pracuces you dlscover on our pro[ecL lor more Lhan LwenLy years, becomlng a M was seen as Lhe llghL (% %<& &$8 *. %<& %-$$&+3 A*8(61 %<(% has changed. 8ecomlng a M ls Lhe llghL aL Lhe enLryway Lo Lhe Lunnel. A<& +)0<% (% %<& &$8 *. %<& %-$$&+ may requlre muluple cerucauons. As an example, aer becomlng a M, a pro[ecL manager may deslre Lo become cerued ln: - rogram ManagemenL B 5-,)$&,, C$(+6,%, DE)++, *' 5-,)$&,, ManagemenL B 5-,)$&,, ;'*2&,,&, - Managlng Complex ro[ecLs - Slx Slgma - 8lsk ManagemenL Some companles have Cerucauon 8oards whlch meeL frequenLly and dlscuss whaL cerucauon programs would be of value for Lhelr pro[ecL managers. Cerucauon programs whlch requlre speclc knowledge of company processes or company lnLellecLual properLy may be lnLernally developed and LaughL by Lhe company's own employees. Lxecuuves have come Lo Lhe reallzauon LhaL Lhere ls a reLurn on lnvesLmenL on pro[ecL managemenL educauon. As such, execuuves are now lnvesung heavlly ln cusLomlzed pro[ecL managemenL Lralnlng especlally ln Lhe behavloral courses. As an example, one execuuve commenLed LhaL he felL LhaL presenLauon skllls Lralnlng was Lhe hlghesL prlorlLy for hls pro[ecL managers. lf a pro[ecL manager makes a hlghly pollshed presenLauon before Lhe cllenL, Lhe cllenL belleves LhaL Lhe pro[ecL ls belng managed Lhe same way. lf Lhe cllenL makes a poor presenLauon, Lhen Lhe cllenL mlghL belleve Lhe pro[ecL ls managed Lhe same way. CLher Lralnlng programs LhaL execuuves feel would be beneclal for Lhe fuLure lnclude: - Managlng complex pro[ecLs - LsLabllshlng key performance lndlcaLors (kl) and dashboards - Pow Lo perform feaslblllLy sLudles and cosL-beneL analyses - Pow Lo valldaLe and revalldaLe pro[ecL assumpuons - Pow Lo esLabllsh pro[ecL governance - Pow Lo manage muluple ,%(E&<*+8&', - Pow Lo deslgn and lmplemenL uld" or adapuve enLerprlse pro[ecL managemenL meLhodologles - Pow Lo develop coplng skllls and sLress managemenL skllls nqoqement Project Monoqement WlLh pro[ecL managemenL vlewed as a sLraLeglc compeLency, lL ls naLural for Lhese companles Lo be sLrong bellevers ln engagemenL pro[ecL managemenL" or engagemenL selllng." ?ears ago, Lhe sales force would sell a producL or servlces Lo a cllenL, and Lhen move on Lhe nd anoLher cllenL. 1oday, Lhe emphasls ls on sLaylng wlLh Lhe cllenL and looklng for addluonal work from Lhe same 2+)&$%,3 ln a marlLal conLexL, an engagemenL can be vlewed as Lhe beglnnlng of a llfe-long parLnershlp. 1he same holds Lrue wlLh engagemenL pro[ecL managemenL. Companles llke l8M and Pewleu-ackard no longer vlew Lhemselves as selllng producLs or servlces. lnsLead, Lhey vlew Lhemselves as buslness soluuon provlders for Lhelr cllenLs, and you cannoL remaln ln buslness as a buslness soluuon provlder wlLhouL havlng superlor pro[ecL managemenL capablllLy. As parL of engagemenL pro[ecL managemenL, you musL convlnce Lhe cllenL LhaL you have Lhe pro[ecL managemenL capablllLy Lo provlde soluuons Lo Lhelr buslness needs on a repeuuve basls. ln exchange for Lhls, you wanL Lhe cllenL Lo LreaL you as a sLraLeglc parLner raLher Lhan as [usL ($*%<&' 2*$%'(2%*'3 uecades ago, Lhe sales force (and markeung) had very llule knowledge abouL pro[ecL managemenL. 1he role of Lhe sales force was Lo wln conLracLs, regardless of Lhe concesslons LhaL had Lo be made. 1he pro[ecL manager Lhen lnherlLed" a pro[ecL wlLh an underfunded budgeL and an lmposslble schedule. 1oday, sales and markeung musL undersLand pro[ecL managemenL and be able Lo sell lL Lo Lhe cllenL as parL of engagemenL selllng. 1he sales force musL sell Lhe company's pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology and Lhe accompanylng besL pracuces. Sales ! #$%&'$(%) *$(+ #$,%) %-%& .*' /&('$) $01 #$23 3 *'+,-' ./010'2'/3 4-,5'63 71/10'2'/3 *'+,-' ./010'2'/3 4-,5'63 71/10'2'/3 ConLlnuous compeLlLlve blddlng D*+&-,*-'2& *' ,)$0+&-,*-'2& conLracLlng (fewer suppllers Lo deal wlLh) F*2-, *$ $&('-Lerm value of Lhe dellverable locus on llfeLlme value of Lhe dellverable ConLracLor provldes mlnlmal supporL for cllenL wlLh Lhelr cusLomers SupporL cllenL wlLh Lhelr cusLomer value analyses (CvA) and cusLomer value measuremenLs (CvM) uLlllze one lnflexlble, llnear LM sysLem Access Lo conLracLor's many nonllnear sysLems 71/10&/0 8-1#&3&,/1" 4-,5'639 71/10&/0 ),/3-1#&3&,/1" 4-,5'639 Slngle person sponsorshlp Covernance by commlLLee osslbly a slngle sLakeholder MulLlple sLakeholders ro[ecL declslon-maklng 8oLh pro[ecL and buslness 8&2),)*$-maklng lnflexlble pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology llexlble or fluld" pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology erlodlc reporLlng 8eal Llme reporLlng Success ls deflned by Lhe Lrlple 2*$,%'()$% Success ls deflned by Lhe Lrlple consLralnL and value kl are derlved from LvM unlque value-drlven kl and markeung are now parL of pro[ecL managemenL. LngagemenL pro[ecL managemenL beneLs boLh Lhe buyer and Lhe seller as seen ln Lhe Lable below. 8lOk 4Nu 4l1k N646MN1 PkOlc1 M4N46MN1 1he beneLs of engagemenL pro[ecL managemenL are clear: - 8oLh Lhe buyer and Lhe seller save on slgnlcanL procuremenL cosLs by deallng wlLh slngle-source or sole- source conLracLs wlLhouL havlng Lo go Lhrough a formallzed blddlng process. - 8ecause of Lhe poLenual long-Lerm sLraLeglc parLnershlp relauonshlp, %<& ,&++&' ), )$%&'&,%&8 )$ %<& llfeume value of Lhe buslness soluuon raLher Lhan [usL Lhe value aL Lhe end of Lhe pro[ecL. - ?ou can provlde llfe-long supporL Lo your cllenL as Lhey Lry Lo develop value-drlven relauonshlps wlLh %<&)' 2+)&$%,3 - 1he buyer wlll geL access Lo many of Lhe pro[ecL managemenL Lools used by Lhe seller. 1he corollary ls (+,* %'-&3 Monoqinq Nontrodinono/ Projects lor more Lhan Lhree decades, we have become experLs ln how Lo manage Lradluonal pro[ecLs. 1hese Lradluonal pro[ecLs can be for lnLernal as well as exLernal cllenLs. WlLh Lhese pro[ecLs, Lhe sLaLemenL of work ls reasonably well-dened, Lhe budgeL and schedule are reallsuc, reasonable esumaung Lechnlques were used, and Lhe nal LargeL of Lhe pro[ecL ls sLauonary. We use a pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology LhaL has been developed and undergone conunuous lmprovemenLs aer use on several pro[ecLs. 1hls Lradluonal meLhodology focuses on llnear Lhlnklng, we follow Lhe well-dened llfe cycle phases and we have forms, LemplaLes, checkllsLs and guldellnes for each phase. now LhaL we have become good aL Lhese Lradluonal pro[ecLs, we are focuslng our auenuon Lo Lhe nonLradluonal or complex pro[ecLs. 1he Lable below shows some of Lhe dlerences beLween managlng Lradluonal and nonLradluonal pro[ecLs: 1k4ul1lON4L vk5u5 NON1k4ul1lON4L PkOlc15 Companles llke l8M, Pewleu-ackard, Mlcroso and Slemens are lnvesung heavlly Lo become soluuon provlders and asslsL cllenLs on a world-wlde basls ln managlng nonLradluonal, complex pro[ecLs. Some of Lhe dlsungulshlng characLerlsucs of complex pro[ecLs, [usL Lo name a few, lnclude: - Worklng wlLh a large number of sLakeholders and parLners, all aL dlerenL levels of pro[ecL managemenL maLurlLy, and many of whom may noL even undersLand Lhe Lechnology of Lhe pro[ecL - ueallng wlLh muluple vlrLual Leams locaLed across Lhe world, and where declslons on Lhe pro[ecL may be made ln favor of pollucs, culLure or rellglous bellefs - Long Lerm pro[ecLs LhaL begln wlLh an lll-dened scope, undergo numerous scope changes, and where Lhe end polnL ls a movlng raLher Lhan sLauonary LargeL - Worklng wlLh parLners and sLakeholders may have llmlLed pro[ecL managemenL Lools and anuquaLed processes LhaL are lncompauble wlLh Lhe pro[ecL manager's Lool klL. New ueve/opments in Project Monoqement lor companles Lo be successful aL managlng complex pro[ecLs on a repeuuve basls and funcuon as a soluuon provlder, Lhe pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology and accompanylng Lools musL be uld or adapuve. 1hls means LhaL you may need Lo develop a dlerenL pro[ecL managemenL meLhodology Lo lnLerface wlLh each sLakeholder glven Lhe facL LhaL each sLakeholder may have dlerenL requlremenLs and expecLauons, and Lhe facL LhaL mosL complex pro[ecLs have long ume spans. 1he gure below lllusLraLes some of Lhe new developmenLs ln pro[ecL managemenL: Nw uvLOPMN15 lN PkOlc1 M4N46MN1 1he ve lLems ln Lhe gure L LogeLher when done properly. - new Success CrlLerla: AL Lhe lnluauon of Lhe pro[ecL, Lhe pro[ecL manager wlll meeL wlLh Lhe ! #$%&'$(%) *$(+ #$,%) %-%& .*' /&('$) $01 #$23 G cllenL and Lhe sLakeholders Lo come Lo a sLakeholder agreemenL on whaL consuLuLes success on Lhls pro[ecL. lnlually, many of Lhe sLakeholders can have Lhelr own denluon of success, buL Lhe pro[ecL manager musL forge an agreemenL. - key erformance lndlcaLors: Cnce Lhe success crlLerla are agreed upon, Lhe pro[ecL manager and Lhe pro[ecL manager wlll work wlLh Lhe sLakeholders Lo dene Lhe key performance lndlcaLors LhaL each sLakeholder wlshes Lo Lrack. lL ls posslble LhaL each sLakeholder wlll have dlerenL kl requlremenLs. - uashboard ueslgn: Cnce Lhe kl are ldenued, Lhe pro[ecL manager, along wlLh Lhe approprlaLe pro[ecL Leam members, wlll deslgn a dashboard for each sLakeholder. Some of Lhe kl ln Lhe dashboards wlll be updaLed perlodlcally whereas oLhers may be updaLed on a real ume basls. - MeasuremenL: 1o updaLe Lhe dashboards and Lhe kl requlres measuremenL. 1hls ls Lhe hardesL parL because noL all of Lhe Leam members or sLraLeglc parLners may have Lhe capablllLy Lo Lrack all of Lhe kl. - Covernance: Cnce Lhe measuremenLs are made, any declslons necessary musL be made or supervlsed by Lhe governance board. 1he governance board can lnclude key sLakeholders as well as sLakeholders LhaL are [usL observers. conc/usions 1he fuLure of pro[ecL managemenL may very well resL ln Lhe hands of Lhe soluuon provlders. 1hese provlders wlll cusLom-deslgn pro[ecL managemenL meLhodologles for each cllenL and posslbly for each sLakeholder. 1hey musL be able Lo develop pro[ecL managemenL skllls LhaL go well beyond Lhe currenL M8Ck Culde and demonsLraLe a wllllngness Lo make buslness declslons as well as pro[ecL declslons. 1he fuLure of pro[ecL managemenL looks qulLe good, buL lL wlll be a challenge. CLher kerzner WhlLe apers: Project neo/th checks kecovery Project Monoqement: 1echniques ond 1ocncs lor keversinq loi/inq Projects 1wenty common Mistokes Mode 8y New or lnexperienced Project Monoqers