Capstone C - Rubric

Content Excellent
15-14
good
13-12
Needs improvement
11
Poor
10-9
unacceptable
8-0
Total
Leadership Effectively and thoroughly
described growth and provided
evidence/artifacts that
demonstrate growth.
Contributions to profession
were valuable and usable for
people in the education
profession
Effectively described
growth and provided
evidence/artifacts
that demonstrate
growth.
Contributions to
profession was
provided but lacked
usable information .
Described growth
provided
evidence/artifacts
but some were not
appropriate for
section or lacked
significant
explanation.
Described growth,
provided 1-2
artifacts/evidence of
growth. Artifacts
lacked explanation
or use within the
product.
Vague or off
topic
description.
Lacked
evidence and
description of
evidence.

Instruction Effectively and thoroughly
described growth and provided
evidence/artifacts that
demonstrate growth.
Contributions to profession
were valuable and usable for
people in the education
profession. Included original
and revised philosophy of
teaching and
compared/contrasted them.
Effectively described
growth and provided
evidence/artifacts
that demonstrate
growth.
Contributions to
profession was
provided but lacked
usable information.
Included original and
revised philosophy of
teaching and
compared/contrasted
them.
Described growth
provided
evidence/artifacts
but some were not
appropriate for
section or lacked
significant
explanation. Only
included the revised
teaching philosophy
and original
philosophy but did
not
compare/contrast
them
Described growth,
provided 1-2
artifacts/evidence of
growth. Artifacts
lacked explanation
or use within the
product. Only
included the original
teaching philosophy
OR the revised one
and did not
compare/contrast
Vague or off
topic
description.
Lacked
evidence and
description of
evidence. Did
not include a
teaching
philosophy

Differentiation Effectively and thoroughly
described growth and provided
evidence/artifacts that
demonstrate growth.
Contributions to profession
were valuable and usable for
people in the education
profession
Effectively described
growth and provided
evidence/artifacts
that demonstrate
growth.
Contributions to
profession was
provided but lacked
usable information
Described growth
provided
evidence/artifacts
but some were not
appropriate for
section or lacked
significant
explanation.
Described growth,
provided 1-2
artifacts/evidence of
growth. Artifacts
lacked explanation
or use within the
product.
Vague or off
topic
description.
Lacked
evidence and
description of
evidence.

Assessment Effectively and thoroughly
described growth and provided
evidence/artifacts that
demonstrate growth.
Contributions to profession
were valuable and usable for
people in the education
profession
Effectively described
growth and provided
evidence/artifacts
that demonstrate
growth.
Contributions to
profession was
provided but lacked
usable information
Described growth
provided
evidence/artifacts
but some were not
appropriate for
section or lacked
significant
explanation.
Described growth,
provided 1-2
artifacts/evidence of
growth. Artifacts
lacked explanation
or use within the
product.
Vague or off
topic
description.
Lacked
evidence and
description of
evidence.

10-9 8 7 6 5-0
Quality Final product was organized
well.
Use of scholarly language,
APA format, Three or less
errors
Final product was
organized well.
Use of scholarly
language, APA
format, 4-5 errors
Final product was
unorganized, use of
scholarly language,
APA format, 4-5
errors
Final product was
unorganized, use of
scholarly language,
APA format, 6-10
errors
Final product
was
unorganized,
the language
used took
away from
product, hard
to understand,
did not follow
APA format

Comments



Final Score



/70