INTEGRATING CURRICULUM
Editors: Timothy Shanahan
University of Illinois at Chicago, Mlinois, USA
Bonita Robinson
Chicago Public Schools, Illinois, USA
Mary Schneider
Oak Park Elementary Schools, Illinois, USA
Integration of curriculum or interaction
of people?
“Howdy. Weleome to RT's new better, or on the similarities of reading immediate release from lonetiness—
Integrating Curticulum’ column and writing. A column like this would you felt when you recognized a famil-
to have you here Since this is your fist normally be chock-a-block full of sug- iar return address in the daily mail
Visit (of many, we hope), we wanted 10 gestions about how to teach vocabu- after you left home in Mexico (or
Stow you sround a bit and et you lok Jary from the science book or how stu- Alabama or Detroit)....Remember
cover te place, Could we get you some ents can use writing to learn to do when Miss Gleason, the fifth-grade
thing to drink? Cup o'coffee, maybe?
Fae earn sae plesseatin'ths ig math story problems. Good things. As teacher at your school, read The
Parente don't go far enough. The inegration fourth-grade teacher, who gave ito
at beginning might strike you as ‘And you got it next, but Ms. Johnson
a bit quaint, or off track, or (let's face are tion- bought her own copy so she could talk
it) even downigh dnb, But it s'. ships embed whhin hem seth. about it with everyone else inthe
realy, Besides being a friendly way to fed by common skills, teacher's lounge without waitin..
get started, we wanted to illustrate rateges If you doubt. Remember a a child, tying o write &
some of our beliefs about reading and for a ‘read- letter to your grandma (in cursive, no
writing and curiculum integration and ing, think back. Jess) beeause you'd seen your mother
that introduction helps us to do so. For" Think back to your teacher, Mr. do so. Despite the fact that you were
the next 2 years we'll be editing this Heimbuch, reading Toby Tyler tothe only 3 and didn't know how to read or
column, and we thought it would be a class on suffocatingly hot spring ater-write...Remember writing an angry
{good idea to let you see where we plan noons. The room quiet and sill except letter to your school principal about
to go with it, We'll write some of for his refreshing voice and the ocea- the new lunchroom supervision policy,
these ourselves, and we'll invite others sional tuning ofa page. (The stell of and then revising it—or not sending
to contribute their thoughts too. But wooden desktops and pencil shavings it—because you thought it might be
whoever does the writing, all entries in still faintly lingers.)....Remember misinterpreted....Remember the
this space will contribute to some reading Charlote's Web to your litle “voice” of your favorite author.
general themes that we want to daughter, snuggled close, all brown Well, you get the point. Thinking
emphasize. eyes and flannel night dress. about literacy separately from social
"Traditionally, treatments of the inte- Especially the last chapter, when she connections is sort of like thinking
gration of curriculum have focused on broke dovn in tears because it was so about roses separately from the flow-
‘Ways to help children read their social real, and how you held her reassuring ers. You can doit but the essence and
Studies, math, and science textbooks ly....Remember the joy—and the beauty are lost somewhere in the
158 The Reading Teacher Vol. 47, No.2 October 1993 tment Aneto 344561 500551254.20transaction. Reading and writing are
fundamentally social activities. We
use them to communicate and to get
close to each other, to maintain rela-
tionships, to emulate others, and so on,
Of course, you might be thinking,
“That's true of reading and writing
generally, but I'm really interested in
content area reading. None of your
‘examples is from math, social studies,
sciences, or the arts.” That's a fair
response, but maybe we should think
about content texts less narrowly.
Science reading is not just about
applying general study skills to sci-
ence texts. Instead, it should be about
communicating like scientists and
understanding how they use reading
and writing to think, work, and inter-
act. Scientists have particular goals
that they strive for and ways of work-
ing towards those goals. Reading and
writing make up a big part of doing
science, and we believe that literacy
teaching should help kids to under-
stand that. If you read or write science
thoughtfully, you can start to get a pic
ture of how scientists think and com-
municate. The same can be said about
history, math, or any other subject
matter. When you understand what the
authors are trying to do with a text,
reading comprehension gets easier and
more powerful.
Recently, one of us cotaught a sev~
enth-/eighth-grade history unit about
the Vietnam War. The classes were
using a popular world history book (a
seven-pound wonder: one part history,
fone part textbook, one part doorstop),
‘The classroom teachers recognized
that most students could read this
weighty tome, but that they seemed to
have trouble remembering anything
from it—and that they didn’t enjoy it.
(It's bo-0-o-o-ring.”) Teaching dete-
riorated to being little more than a
retelling of key points from the book.
How to change this? We decided to
‘make history reading more social
‘The teachers scrounged around and
found as many different history texts
as they could. Some were leftovers
from the previous series being used.
Others were samples from programs
considered during the adoption
process. Still others were found in the
teachers’ own collections or in local
libraries. Enough books were assem-
bled so that groups of students could
work with four or five different histo-
Ty texts. Quite a collection.
Students were placed in groups of
six or seven. Each group received a
pile of history books. along with 2 sin-
ale list of questions about the war
They were asked to agree upon
answers fo each question and to record
these on the sheet. How they used the
books and worked together was up to
them. There was nothing particularly
notable about the questions. All of
them asked about simple factual infor-
mation. We didn’t even try to pose
high level questions at this point. One
‘question, for example, queried, “What
year did the Vietnam War begin?” The
Students figured the assignment 0 be a
cinch. Most groups distributed the var-
ious books among their members and
began searching all at the same time
forthe same information
This is where the real fun began!
Students stated to find the informa-
tion. “I've got it, the war started in
1964." Team leaders would dutifully
begin to print this response on the
answer sheet, Just then, someone else
‘would chime in, “No, that's not right.
My book says 1954.” The students
‘would start to show their finds to each
other, when another would pipe up,
“You're both wrong. This one says
that it really got started in 1945." And
still another: “Gee, this stupid book
doesn't even tell when it started. Why
not?”
How (o resolve the disagreements?
Groups tried different strategies. One
child, after much fruitless debate in his
group, said, “Tl solve it. look it up
in the World Book.” Or others ques-
tioned the teachers about it: “You're
old enough to know the right answer.
‘You were there at the time.” Some
groups just got frustrated: “How are
‘we supposed to know when it stated
if the books don’t even know? What
ddoes it matter anyway?”
This cooperative activity was obvi-
‘ously social in that it involved groups
of children working together, some-
times harmoniously, sometimes not.
‘They certainly were discussing history
among themselves and with their
teachers in meaningful ways—becom-
ing a discourse community. They were
talking about textual information, and
so on, But more important, they were
starting to understand the intellectual
and social dimensions of what history
is. In her insightful book Literacy as
Involvement: The Acts of Writers,
Readers, and Texts, Deborah Brandt
(1990) writes, “Seeing texts more
fully in relationship to the processes
that produce them allows for a more
socially sensitive interpretation of
their basic features” (p. 9). These stu-
dents were starting to confront the
Processes that produce history books.
‘They were awakening to the realiza-
tion that fallible human beings wrote
these texts and that this act of writing
involved choices. The student who
indicated that it didn’t matter when the
‘war started was partially right. But he
‘was partially wrong too. Different
years were selected by textbook writ-
ers because they possessed different
beliefs about what caused the war;
they were simply assembling a pur-
Poseful, factual story that would all fit
together.
If history is seen as just a bunch of
‘objective facts, then it is “bo-0-0-0-
ring.” Such facts could tell us very lit-
tle about human beings and what
makes them tick. But if it is seen as an
interpretive attempt by a historian to
make sense of his or her world or to
justify or defend particular actions,
then it starts to get interesting. Is this &
fact? Does everybody agree? What
evidence supports this? Why did they
select this fact and not that one? Why
did these authors pick 1945, 1954, and
1964 as starting dates? The questions
ate endless, but they all lead back to
how historians think and do their
work, how they interact, and what
their motivations might be. The stu-
dents were starting to think about the
processes that create history in the
first place, and they were discovering
the central role that literaey plays in
that creation,
Integrating curriculum’ is not only
about putting together parts of afor accessing information from con-
tent texts, but they are also fundamen-
tal features of the subjects under
study. History, for example, couldn't
exist without writing, given the weak
nesses and changeability of memory,
What is the role of literacy within
math, science, technology, art, and
social sciences?
ur hope is that the columns that
appear here will expose the facets of
these ideas in practical ways for class-
room teachers so that children can bet-
ter appreciate the meaning of literacy
across the curriculum, and so that lit.
eracy can help them to understand
FRAME
SHAaOM
Frameworks Core:
(J Develops independent learners utilizing
holistic learning through language.
each other better. Literacy and cur- “So long, until aext time. Take it easy
riculum integration should be about and take care.”
interacting with others, and the ideas
of others, in thoughtful ways. If you
have ideas that you would like us to
interact with, or suggestions for
columas, please write to us at the
address in the box.
Reterence
Brandt, 0. (1990). Lteracy as involverent
The acts of writers, readers, and tots.
Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois,
University Press.
Integrating Curiculum profiles how reading and writing, through their intercon:
eetions with other subject areas, are ways for children to lear and communicate
in society. Send questions, comments, or suggestions to Timothy Shanahan,
University of Ilinols at Chicago, College of Education (M/C 147), Box 4348,
‘Chicago, TL, 60680, USA.
Frameworks:
A Whole Language Staff Development Program
for Grades K-8
Meeting Your Whole Language Needs
Authored by Jan Turbill, Andrea Butler and Brian Cambourne
with Gail Langton |
1993-1994
ere
17 Provides practical classroom + Callornidi « Chciue!s “ inois
+ Minnesota
applications.
7 Uses latest research in language,
learning, and staff development.
1 Promotes a better understanding of the
principles that underlie holistic teaching
and learning.
Trains faci
to their district.
{tors to bring program back Frameworks was piloted and evaluated in dis-
tricts of all sizes and multicultural settings.
To receive a brochure, schedule training or spon-
As follow-up to the Core training, sor a training site contact:
specialized classroom-oriented Modules Carol Filey or Barbara Strait
may be purchased. Otfice of Staff Development, Wayne-Finger Lakes BOCES
'3501 County Road 20, Stanley, NY 14561
No further training is required. So pen star prs eae
160 The Reading Teacher Vol. 47, No.2 October 1993,