What needs to be considered when forming a positive student-teacher relationship? Understanding the methods of teaching and being knowledgeable are obviously important parts of the puzzle, but the nature of communication is an equally important part of the puzzle (Frymier & Houser, 2000, p. 12). Various students at the Midwestern University, were asked to take part in a study to determine whether this is in fact is true, in terms of whether communication is an equally important part of the puzzle (Frymier & Houser, 2000, p.12), and thus to determine what in fact, they consider important for a teacher to do in order to build and maintain a positive and effective child-teacher relationship. The results to this study support this, in suggesting that an effective child-teacher relationship has a direct correlation to successful learning. To therefore promote successful learning, it is important for teachers to establish effective relationships, and to do so, the results suggest that teachers need to acquire knowledge of how to balance a relationship which is both close but also professional and content based (Frymier & Houser, 2000). Close and immediate relationships, as stated by Frymier & Houser, (2000), encourage, motivate and help children to place trust in their teacher, and thus when trust develops it is much easier to ask [questions which may at times seem foolish] or ask for feedback and clarification (p. 12). With trust comes respect and comfort, and with comfort children will feel more secure in the classroom. As Rimm- Kaufman (2014) states, teachers who have established these relationships with children outline that less children avoid coming to school, and become engaged learners, whom have the confidence to become self-regulated learners due to the fact that they feel accepted as a worthy and inclusive classroom member. However with all of this in mind, the question now, is how teachers can establish such relationships with children. Mary-Anne Sammut-S00103680 EDFD452Transition into the Profession 2
After careful analysis of the results, Frymier & Houser (2000) have concluded that when teachers and students move beyond the formal teacher-student roles and begin to see each other as individuals, interpersonal relationships form (p.12). To create such effective interpersonal relationships with children, teachers must implement immediacy, which will promote closeness and trust. To do this, teachers can use both verbal and non-verbal communication. To establish such relationships, Frymier & Houser (2000), state that on the verbal level, teachers should use words of praise and admiration, as well as directly address children by name. Teachers should ask questions which demonstrate and interest in their students, share experiences and stories of their own, and ask and encourage students to share their stories. They should also ask students to speak of their thoughts, ideas and opinions; as this will demonstrate to children that they too, have a voice in the classroom and therefore their opinion matters and is valued. Frymier and Houser (2000) also suggest, that in order to build relationships which are constructive and positive with the children they teach, it is important to as a teacher; have referential skills as well as the ability to support children egocentrically (p.11). To have referential skills, means to have the ability to clearly explain instructions, so that children will intern have a concise understanding of what is expected of them and clear goals which appear achievable. This in which results have shown, reduces the feeling of uncertainty (Frymier and Houser, 2000, p.11), and encourages children to have a visual representation of what in fact success looks like (Berger & Calabrese, 1975). To have the skills to support the egos of children, will enable children to feel valued and feel as if their presence and contribution is worthy, which intern, Frymier & Houser (2000) suggest, will motivate and inspire learning. Despite verbal communication, Frymier Mary-Anne Sammut-S00103680 EDFD452Transition into the Profession 3
and Houser (2000), also discuss how non-verbal communication plays a crucial and key role in establishing and maintaining close and positive relationships with children. With this in mind, teachers must be aware of the non-verbal actions which they ascertain. After analysing the study results, Frymier & Houser (2000), found that the majority of the students who were studied, found that they were able to have a positive relationship with the teachers whom smile and make eye contact, use varied animated facial expressions and roam the room to assist and be inclusive to all students.
What is constructivism and child led learning, and how does this approach positively influence children? New trends in education put new demands on teachers and the learning culture (Hrbkov & Vvrov, 2012, p. 228). Therefore, before we begin to answer how child led learning will positively influence children; we must firstly answer why such an approach is needed. In this technologically reliant society, Hrbkov & Vvrov (2012) state that it is time for teachers to teach children to become self-regulated learners. This means that the role of the teacher [needs to shift] from being an information provider to [becoming] the role of a guide who provides students with the knowledge of today's world (Hrbkov & Vvrov, 2012, p.228). To therefore provide children with this knowledge, teachers should allow them to construct their own knowledge through the experiences they have, thus creating a learning environment of child led learners. To encourage children to be the leaders and initiators of their learning, teachers have the role of planning experiences and lessons which provide children with the freedom to learn Mary-Anne Sammut-S00103680 EDFD452Transition into the Profession 4
through the exploration of various medians, and to not merely be passive recipients of information (Giesen, 2013). Allowing one to explore using a variety of medians not only caters to the learning of multiple thinkers, but readies learners to be open and critically minded thinkers, ready to live in this changing paradigm we live in (Robinson, ND). By enabling children to construct their own knowledge and meaning, teachers will be implementing an approach known as the constructivist approach, which was developed after Levi Vygotsky and others criticised the other learning approaches used in their time (Hua Liu & Matthews, 2005). These theorists thought beyond what was thought of and practiced as active learning, as they understood learning to be more of a holistic process, and active learning to be more complex than what was practiced (Hua Liu & Matthes, 2005). Therefore, for teachers to implement the constructivist approach, they must recognize the true meaning behind the term active learning (Cooperstein & Kocevar-Weidinger, 2003). As Coopestein & Kocevar-Weidinger, (2003) state, the constructivist approach involves the whole child, and aims at targeting ones curiosity and interests, for without such deep involvement learning will not be memorable. What teachers must therefore keep in mind, is that for true active learning to occur, the activity [they plan, must] lead to the concepts; [instead of] the concepts lead[ing] to the activity (Coopestein & Kocevar- Weidinger, 2003, p. 141). In addition as Sugata Mitras Whole in the wall experiments prove, when children have interest, they are able to learn extraordinary things and take on great challenges (Mitra, 2010). Therefore to understand the true meaning of such an approach and how to implement it in the classroom, is essential for teachers to understand, before they simply highlight it as a key inclusion in their teaching philosophy. This essay has therefore assisted the writer to reflect upon what they chose to include in their teaching philosophy, and has given the writer Mary-Anne Sammut-S00103680 EDFD452Transition into the Profession 5
the knowledge to analyse why in fact such components are so crucial in the learning process. The writer now understands not only why positive child-teacher relationships are important, but also now understands how to implement such relationships using various verbal and non- verbal communication skills. The writer now also understands what in fact true active learning is, and how the constructivist approach will support children to become self- regulated learners who construct their knowledge through their experiences, and intern are involved in memorable learning which is highly relational. Word Count: 1,335
References Berger,C.R.,& Calabrese,R.J.(1975).Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a Developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research,1,99-1.
Cooperstein, S & Kocevar-Weidinger, E (2003). Beyond Active Learning: A Constructivist Approach to Learning. 32 (2), 141-148. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/00907320410537658
Coppola, B. P. (2002). Writing a statement of teaching philosophy. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(7), 448-453. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200318733?accountid=8194
Frymier, A and Houser, M (2000). Communication Education: The Teacher- Student Relationship as an Interpersonal Relationship.49:3, 207-219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209. Mary-Anne Sammut-S00103680 EDFD452Transition into the Profession 6
Giesen, J (2013). Constructivism: A Holistic Approach to Teaching and Learning. Northern Illinois. Faculty Development and Instructional Design Centre. Retrieved from http://www.niu.edu/facdev/programs/handouts/constructivism.pdf
Hrbckov, K., & Vvrov, S. (2012). Subjective conception of students' self-regulated learning from the perspective of a beginner teacher. Asian Social Science, 8(10), 228- 239. Retrieved from http://0search.proquest.com.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/docview/1033044497?accountid=
Hua Liu & Matthews, (2005). Vygotskys philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms Examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386-399.
Kaufman, S (2014). Improving Students' Relationships with Teachers to Provide Essential Supports for Learning. Washington ,DC. American Psychology Association.