EDCU 11022 Numeracy in Action Student name:

Criteria
1. Knowledge and application of curriculum documents to plan for teaching and learning. High Distinction 85 100%

Assessment task 1 - 50% Planning for mathematics teaching and learning Marker name:
Distinction 75 84% Credit 65 74%

Grade:
Pass 50 64% Fail < 50%

Expert knowledge and application of curriculum and planning documents for teaching and learning in mathematics. The three levels of planning demonstrate thorough and in-depth understanding of mathematics and primary school planning and preparation requirements.

Comprehensive knowledge and application of curriculum and planning documents for teaching and learning in mathematics. The three levels of planning demonstrate thorough understanding of mathematics and primary school planning and preparation requirements. Detailed and accurate understanding of learning issues. Clear and concise explanation of teaching approach and sequence for developing understanding of mathematics topic. Group member collaboration provides evidence of professional communication and problemsolving with regard to curriculum matters in both scope and depth.

Accurate knowledge and application of curriculum and planning documents for teaching and learning in mathematics. The three levels of planning demonstrate comprehensive understanding of mathematics and primary school planning and preparation requirements. Accurate understanding of learning issues. Appropriate explanation of teaching approach and sequence for developing understanding of mathematics topic. Group member collaboration provides some evidence of professional communication and problem-solving with regard to curriculum matters.

Knowledge and application of curriculum and planning documents for teaching and learning in mathematics.

Limited knowledge and application of curriculum and planning documents for teaching and learning in mathematics. The three levels of planning do not demonstrate understanding of mathematics and primary school planning and preparation requirements. Limited/no understanding of learning issues. Incomplete explanation of teaching approach and sequence for developing understanding of mathematics topic. Group member collaboration provides little evidence of communication and problem-solving with regard to curriculum matters.

2. Knowledge of learning challenges and diagnosis of learning issues. 3. Knowledge of effective pedagogical approaches for teaching mathematics. 4. Evidence of group collaboration about curriculum matters related to planning, teaching and assessing the chosen mathematics topic. 5. Individual synthesis of key understanding of teaching & learning. 6. Communication and referencing

Thorough and in-depth understanding and application of learning issues. Very clear and in-depth explanation of teaching approach and sequence for developing understanding of mathematics topic. Group member collaboration provides evidence of professional communication and problem-solving with regard to curriculum matters in scope, depth and willingness to challenge each others thinking. Clear insightful justification that identifies all key points. Communication is exceptional and utilises correct language, grammar and terminology. Scholarly referencing throughout.

The three levels of planning demonstrate an accurate understanding of mathematics and primary school planning and preparation requirements. Understanding of most learning issues. Mostly complete explanation of teaching approach and sequence for developing understanding of mathematics topic. Group member collaboration provides some evidence of communication and problemsolving with regard to curriculum matters.

Clear insightful justification that identifies most key points. Communication is clear and utilises language, grammar and terminology correctly with minimal errors. Accurate referencing throughout. Full participation and insightful contribution to the research and preparation of the presentation response.

Clear justification that identifies some key points. Communication is effective and utilises language, grammar and terminology accurately with minor errors. Consistent referencing throughout Keen participation and helpful contribution to the research and preparation of the presentation response.

Justification identifies some key points and is clearly written. Oral and/or written skills are adequate and utilise language, grammar and terminology with some errors. Evidence of referencing. Participation and contribution to most aspects of the research and preparation of the presentation response.

Justification requires further editing for clarity. Communication is inadequate and utilise language, grammar and terminology with many errors. Little or no referencing. Little participation and/or contribution to the research and preparation of the presentation response.

7. Contribution and teamwork (*Rated by group)

Full participation and valuable contribution to every aspect of the research and preparation of the presentation response.

Please note: Criteria 1- 4 will be graded from evidence on the wiki and will be the same for all group members. Criteria 5 - 7 will be graded individually.

Comments: