Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
In the article “Emotional autonomy versus susceptibility to peer pressure: a case study of
Hongkong adolescent students” Kwok-wai Chan and Siu-mui Chan quoted from Holmbeck
biological, psychological, and social role changes”.( Holmbeck, 1994, p. 1 in the article).
They further took definition from other researchers such as: Steinberg (1990), Steinberg
and Steinberg (1986), Stewart et.al (2003), Zimmer-Gembeck and Collins (2003), that
adolescents are individuals who are confused in identifying themselves and they initiate to seek
support from other figures especially those who have similar characteristics with them outside
their parents. This condition cause them need acceptance from their friends or other new friends.
The connectedness to their friends may be not always positive but it will be worrying
when they are offered by their peer to do negative behaviors which violate the social norms and
values such as: sexual debut or sexual abuse and vandalism. If they reject that offer may be they
will think they are not included any more in the peer group and will considered enemy.
The fact of the problem has actually happened all in every part of the world including in
In Hongkong parents are so frustrated how to deal with their children that are more
resistant to them and parents feel that authoritarian parenting style as they did successfully in the
societies especially North America. However those studies are considered not convincing for
Asian people because of different culture. So, this research is design to study the emotional
autonomy of Hongkong Chinese adolescent students, their susceptibility to peer demands and
their connections. The result of the research hopefully would be a beneficial input for teachers
and parents to understand the autonomy development of adolescents and a guidance that will be
As cited from Zimmer-Gembeck and Collins (2003) the authors said that emotional
them, and implies changing conceptions of, and relations with parents”. ( Zimmer-Gembeck and
Collins, 2003, p. 2 in the article). This variable was measured using the Emotional Autonomy
From the study done by Steinberg and Silverberg (1986) found that emotional
independence from parents and independence from peer demanding are negatively correlated. It
means the more emotionally independent an early adolescent felt from parents, the less likely
they feel self-reliant when facing demands from their peers. In addition, Steinberg and Silverberg
(1986) found adolescent girls are more independent than boys and more assertive to their friends
In terms of susceptibility to peer pressure, taken from Berndt (1979), Stainberg and
Silverberg (1986) the writer of the article noted that when adolescents are becoming independent
from their mother and father, they are highly accepting to peer demand related to affectionate
matters and regular activities. Generally, the tendency of following what their friends offer or
pressure is more crucial within the period of early and middle adolescence than the period of pre-
This research applied a questionnaire consisting of two instruments that was given to a
sample of 550 adolescent students at the secondary level. The first scale, the emotional autonomy
scale (EAS) that developed by Steinberg and Silverberg (1986), was to measure emotional
autonomy while the second scale which was developed by Kim and Koh (2003), was to measure
susceptibility of peer pressure. The participants were also asked to give demographic data.
1. That emotional autonomy of Hong Kong adolescents was recognized by the increased
age, starting from 12 years old. The more an individual’s age increasing the more he or she
autonomy between genders but there was between grade level and age of students.
2. The Hong Kong adolescent students' were not tending toward peer persuasion both
male and female students but there is significant difference in response to peer offer in terms of
3. Hong Kong adolescents' emotional autonomy was negatively related to their tendency
to peer pressure. They were found to be emotionally independent but they were not tending
toward peer pressure. Compared to their counterparts in the western countries, Hong Kong
The research done by Kwok-wai Chan and Siu-mui Chan has given me a lot of new
culture. Anyhow, culture can greatly influence on the emotional autonomy of an individual and
on her or his susceptibility to peer pressures. What makes me interested is what had been found
by Steinberg and Silverberg (1986) that adolescent girls in western countries are more
autonomous than boys and more assertive toward peer pressure both in doing deviant social
Another interest thing is, emotional autonomy is positively correlated with susceptibility
to peer pressures for western adolescent. While in some Asian countries both girls and boys are
not more autonomous than each other and their susceptibility compared with counterparts from
western countries, Asian people like in Hong Kong may be more able to resist peer pressures.
susceptibility to peer pressures. The more an individual have emotional autonomy the least he is
susceptible to peer pressures. This is because they still hold traditional Chinese culture and
because the gender stereo type of females in the Chinese parental expectation that girls should be
gentle and more obedient that finally may cause girls’ score in susceptibility is lower than boys’
Generally, boys are easier to follow their peer persuasion because there are a lot of
activities that can be done together such as smoking, playing chess, or go hiking. And if they
Meanwhile, for girls there are too few activities that can facilitate them to get together
and if they do like what adolescent boys do, they will get strong resistance from society members
because all those activities are highly unacceptable. Besides, members of society will judge them
as “naughty girls” or ‘street girls”. This justification will make not only girls who feel shamed
In Singapore according to Sim and Koh (2003), males were more susceptible to peer
Although it is not wise to equalize things which are different at least it can make us
understand that a similar thing can be interpreted and expressed differently because of different
region, situation, and also culture. The lessons we can take from this phenomenon as a scientist is
better we think globally and act locally and what can be appropriate for certain local people is
not always universally applied. There has been a lot of culture that must be considered.
Another aspect I will comment about this study is, as parents we should apply parenting
styles accurately because in adolescence period an individual tends to interact with peer more
often, to begin searching for autonomy emotionally and behaviorally, to lessen his or her
dependency on parents, and to conform to peer behaviors to get acceptance. So that, applying a
The QDSS (2008) on her article published on October 29th, 2008 (I do not know exactly
the name of media) stated three different styles of parenting: authoritarian, permissive, and
assertive. She further explained that parents who apply authoritarian parenting style will have a
heart to make their children being spoiled and dependent on them. They never give an
opportunity to their teenager an atmosphere for self-reliant. They strictly monitor their children
even for the small matters. More seriously, such a type of these parents will always involve
themselves in taking decision for their children. As a result, it will remain the children being
On the contrary, parents who apply permissive parenting style will absolutely give the
chance for their children to manage their own-self without considering whether they are mature
enough or not. Consequently, the children do not know the boundaries they cannot do to do it.
On the other hands, assertive parenting parents will create the conducive environment for
the better development of their children. They open to communicate with their children. They are
flexible in growing up their children. They never freely give their children to do whatever they
want to do and never strictly forbid their children in realizing their wishes. Parents develop how
they can be attached emotionally to their children. Assertive parents put themselves in the
position where their role is a facilitator not a dictator or ignorant for the growth of their children.
According to me assertive parenting style is the best parenting style that should be
applied in bringing up our children in line with the fast progress of modern era. The research
showed that parents in Hongkong in 2003 complained how to educate their children.
The authoritarian parenting style that was used successfully in the past has now failed to
solve the problems related to this case. In addition, in my regent, parents practiced this parenting
style get resistance from their children. On top of that, their child leaves their home for many
weeks and months to protest his parents’ action on him. Besides, child girls who are over
protected by her parents to intermingle with boys are often found have premarital sexual
forced by their parents to study there because their parents were graduates from that school.
Parents do not consider their child’s aptitude, interest, and capability. Consequently, it takes a
long time for a child to adapt himself to a new environment. Finally, that child often, come to
class late, play truant, and develop lack of motivation that finally perform low achievement and
Likewise permissive parenting style, parents often get physical resistance or even will be
threatened to be killed by their child because of unfulfilling the child’s need such as buying a
new motor cycle or car. Furthermore, children from permissive parents generally failed to
continue their study into the higher level or university. Sadly, after their parents passed away they
cannot be independence in their life. Consequently, in the past they were rich people but now
I see many social phenomena happened in my society and even my country related to
adolescent people such as: premarital sexual intercourse, vandalism, aggressive behavior, etc,
from time to time which are higher and higher, are seemingly caused by wrong parenting style
which is adopted not only by parents, teachers, and society. Parenting style in wider scope can
also be implemented in schools and society because not only parents who educate a child but
Assertive parents can understand their child. They are neither permissive nor
authoritarian. Assertive teachers can facilitate their students to maximize their potentials and
bridge them into their ideals. And assertive society can give a conducive environment for
children to grow well and to contribute to their society. Therefore, assertive parenting style is
optional because it will make your child can develop more healthily and more responsible either
REFERENCES:
1. Corey, Gerald., Corey, Marianne Schneider., & Callanan, Patrick. (2007). Issues and
2. Corey, Gerald., & Corey, Marianne Schneider. (2007). Becomig a Helper 5th, Edition.
Thomson Brooks/Cole.
4. Corey, Gerald., (2009). Case Approach to Counseling & Psychotherapy 7th, Edition.
Thomson Brooks/Cole.
6. Gibson, Robert L., & Mitchell, Marianne H. (2008). Introduction to Counseling and
7. Corey, Gerald., (2008). Theory and Practice of Group Counseling 7th, edition.
8. Corey, Gerald., & Corey, Marianne Schneider (2006). Group Process and Practice 7th