‘The Sociological Review
Safer Rc
fare Ma oy Uni, Cage
B sain
Dry of Aon
Deny of Masher
1 sar
Une of Euer
Unter Caley. Seon,
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW MONOGRAPH 38
A Sociology of Monsters:
Essays on Power,
Technology and
Domination
Edited by John Law
R
London and New YorkTechnology is society made durable
Bruno Latour
Abstract
1s it possible to deve a set of concepts that could replace the
tecinaogyscety divide? Tht tof new concepts -aocation and
‘bsitation = might help to reprate ome of the trata! questions
fsx oder and pec that ofthe durability of domination of
power. However, instead of wing ferent tol nase power and
teaknes, ie agued that power and domination are spl erent
‘econsucing eteois is gud that ll description of power and
‘tomination may be obsined
For a long time socal theory has been concerned with defining
power relations (Barnes 1948), but that always found it dfclt
{o sce how domination i achieved. In this paper I argue that in
‘order to understand domination we have to turn sway from aa
txcusive concern with social relations and weave them into 3
fabric that includes non-human actants, acants that offer the
possiblity of holding society together as a durable whole To be
fure, the distinction between material nfactruture and symbolic
fupersruture has been wsefl to remind socal theory ofthe
importance of non-homans, bu its avery inaceurate portrayal of
their mobilisation and engagement inside the social inks. This
Paper aims to explore another repertoire for studying this process
‘f mobilisation, In the rst part, will we avery simple example
toilustate what T believe to be the right focus for detecting the
entry point of techniques into the human collective. nthe second
part, Iwill analyse the beautiful ease ofthe Kodak camera studied
‘by R. Jenkins 1 show how soil theory could benefit rom history
of technology. Finally, I will try to explain how stability and
domination may be stcounted for once non-humans are woven
Jnto the social fabri,
103Bruno Latour
1 Prom contest and content to association and substitution
Consider tiny innovation commonly found in European hel
attaching large cumbersome weights {0 room keys ip order 10
‘remind customers that they should leave their key af the fron desk
everytime they leave the Hotel instead of taking along Om tour
fof the city. Am impoative statement nscibed om a sgn Please
leave you room Key atthe oat desk before you go ou ~ appears
to be not enough to make customers behave secording t0 the
speaker's wishes. Our fickle customers seemingly have other
oneerns, and room eps disappear into thin ait, But if the
inaovator, called w the rescue, displaces the inscription by
introducing alge metal weight, the hotel manager no lange has
to rely on is customers” sense of moral obligttion, Customers
suddenly become only 100 happy 10 rid. themselves of this
annoying object which makes her pockets bulge and weighs down
their handbags: they goto the front desk on their own accord 10
et rid of it. Where the sign, the inscription, the imperative,
‘ciple, of moral obligation all fled, the hotel manage, the
innovator, and the metal weight succeeded. And yet, obtaining
‘such discipline has a price: the hotel manager hd t sly himself
with an inovator, and the innovator had to ally herself with
‘various metal weights and their manufacturing processes.
“This minor imovation leary ilustates the fundamental pice
underlying all tudes of science and technology: the force with
Which speaker makes a statement | never enough, in the
beginning, to peed the path thatthe statement wll low. This
path depends on what successive listeners do with the statement.
the listencr~ inthis cae the hotel customer ~ forgets the order
Inscribed on the sign, oF if he doci’t speak the langage, the
Satement is reduced to Bit of pant of the piece of board. If
{he seuputouseastomer obey the order, he as complied with he
Imperative, thereby adding reality to it. The strength of the
statement thus depends in part on what i writen on the sign, and
in parton what each listener does with the insription. A thousand
different customers will follow a thousand diferent path after
reading the order. In order be aleto predict the path, the hotel
‘manager has two choiees. He ean ether make al the customers
qual by ensuring that they wil iow Row to read the language
and that they will know that going oa hotel in Europe means that
‘one has a privat, locke room but that the key must Be left at the
tos
‘Technology i society made durable
desk upon exiting the Hotel every dy. Or he can fond bis
statement insuchs way tet to ert comer al behave
ime sme manor, reales of thee native language or hie
percnce wth hotel The cole i hetween corporation and
“the pammatcal imperative act 8 fist loud ~ eve your
key te meron othe st send oa the pote word
ics aed tothe mera to win the good graces ofthe
Somer comtiutes hd he ma ofthe etl weight ads 3
fourth’ The numberof fade tut one needs to ach 10 the
Sttoment depends onthe etme’ estan, heels,
tier sage, ad thermo. Tako dependson how ly the
here! manoer mats to contol hi castors” And fal,
Aspens onthe everne ofthe esters The program of the
speaker get move completed they respond 10 he ant
rotons ofthe tne werd cnt could beak the ring
CDnmecing te ight ty tothe hey wei, he anova woah
thon have to ada soldered ring o preset ach breakage Thais
fh anantrpiogom, I's pated hotel manager waned
paar zero ey lore could place a uaa eh Gort search
the customers but theme woud prota le hs stoners
intad ls ol once mos ofthese stepogrms re ounce
thr the path taken bythe sstementtecomesprediable. The
Ustomen obey the ode, with oni few sxepions and he
hotel manager aseis th los off Hey
iol the eer hs obeyed sn fone he same the ini
cover has been oni, ot ronomied Ta foowing 8
Steno allowing sentence thong te context 8 apisaon
for he we moving rom langage tothe pas. The program,
icave your fey atthe fot desk whi now seaplesy
rest he majo te casters sinpy nou hone we
Sted wh. dplacemem har tensormet f-Coxtomers 90
Toner cove teem fee ned, they gt fa sly
tee tho deforms ther pockets, I thy conform, 10 the
imange' with snot Des they a te gn aor eee
they te prtaary wellmanered Is because they cannot So
terse, They dont even tk aout fe The statement mo
longer the same the customers ren one the same the ey
to longer te tae een the bol longer quite eat he
Ste CAkich 198 Latour 19; Law 198)
‘Tis ample the fst pci’ any of
ingovation nsec ad tesnogy: the fate tate 0
os