Evaluation :( codisks lists or rubrics for each activity during can be self or coevaluation)

1- Pre- test: Do you enjoy the holidays in our country? Si no

Do you share the holidays in family and friend? Si no

Do you make any project using the technology? Si no

Is important celebrate the holidays in our country? Si no

Do you consider is important to celebrate belief of other regions? Si no

Activity 1 Checklist to evaluate a brainstorming: CRITEREAS (5%) Si No Following teacher instruction Team work drafting is consistent perform with initiative incorporate the main ideas Presents a glossary of key words Takes the time employment (by group) Observation: Checked by:

Activity 2 Self- Evaluation Critereas Evaluation always almost always I reported the objectives working together. I know the tasks and functions that I should perform I participated actively and voluntarily to achieve the goal of working togethers I deliver on time everything required for the job. I maintained an attitude of respect, familiarity and dialogue. My motivation and personal development affect the quality of working together. Provides ideas and opinions that help us to think more creativity and deep the work I had available to work in team I identified with my group.

sometimes

Rarely

Co- Evaluation Critereas Evaluation Everybody disposition to work as a team The skills and Experiences of each were complemented Contributes to group discussions The goal are set for working together or team All team members provided always almost always sometimes Rarely

the information needed for a good job The mutual contributions help us to think more creativity and deep the homework The work we do were excellent

Activity 3 Rubric to handwritten letters Students Name:____________ date:______ Criteria

Relevancy of Information to Subject being taught

Exceptional
All of the information on the handwritten letters is accurate and relevant to the Subject. There are no extra visible marks or smudges on the paper. Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic..

Admirable
Two or fewer of the statements are not accurate or relevant to the subject. There are 1-2 visible marks or smudges on the paper. Writing is coherent and Logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present.

Acceptable
More than two of the statements are not accurate and/or relevant to the Subject. There are 3-5 visible marks or smudges on the paper. Writing is coherent and Logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout essay. Consistently correct grammar and Mechanics.

poor
Not has information or relevant with the topic

score

Neatness

Organization

There are more than 5 visible marks or smudges on the paper. Writing lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors.

Grammar & spelling

Creativity/ Originality

Consistently correct grammar and mechanics spelling, with creative word choice and sentence structure. The artwork demonstrates original personal

Consistently correct grammar and mechanics, with varied word choice and sentence structure. The artwork demonstrates some personal expression and

Inappropriate and inconsistent awareness of conventional grammar and mechanics.

The artwork demonstrates an average amount of

The artwork demonstrates little creativity expression and

expression and outstanding problem solving skills. Total Points

logical problem solving skills.

personal expression.

problem solving skills.

Additional Comments: ______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________

Power Point Rubric Students Name:____________ date:______

criteria Title 4 Excellent Title is creative, sparks interest and is related to the story and topic. Completely covers all required parts of Investigation. Speaks clearly and distinctly all the time, no mispronounced words Always willing and focused during group work and presentation. Original illustrations and pictures are detailed, attractive, creative and relate to the text on the page Almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Tries to keep people working well together Comprehensive use of technology is apparent 3 Good Title is related to the story and topic. 2 Satisfactory Title is present, but does not appear to be related to the story and topic. Covers most parts of the investigation/ Does not speak clearly and distinctly, numerous mispronounced words Sometimes willing and focused during group work and presentation. Original Illustrations of picture but few image relate to the text on the page. Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group but sometimes is not a good team member. Little understanding of technology 1 Poor The title is not presented score

content

Pronunciation

Completely covers most required parts of the Investigation. Speaks clearly and distinctly most of the time, several mispronounced words Elaboration consists of some specific details; and not worked hard to acquire the purpose Original illustrations are somewhat detailed, attractive, and relate to the text on the page

Investigation incompletely covered Often mumbles, cannot be understood

Participation in Preparation and Presentation

Elaboration is sparse; almost no details; and did not work to get a good presentation Illustrations are not present OR they are not original. Few picture

Illustrations or picture

Collaboration with Peers

Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Does not cause "waves" in the group. Acceptable understanding of technology.

Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Often is not a good team member No understanding of technology

Technology Connection

Sequencing (Organization)

Information Information in logical presented in sequence logical, interesting sequence

Difficult to follow presentation-student jumps around

Cannot understand presentation--no sequence of information

Total points Additional Comments: ______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________

Activity 5 Role Play Rubric

Students Name:____________ date:______

Criteria
Presentation of Characters

Excellent
Convincing communication of characters feelings, situation and motives.

good
Competent communication of characters feelings, situations and motives.

Costumes or dress

Costume shows considerable work/creativity and make the presentation better. Movements seem fluid and help the audience visualize Choices demonstrates insight and powerfully enhance role play All had a meaningful and relevant role and contribution Performance demonstrates a strong knowledge and understanding of the historical figure.
Maintained time frame.

Costume reflects imagination and reflects some unique distinctions. Made movements or gestures that enhances articulation.

Satisfactory Adequate communication of characters feelings, situation and motives. Costume reflects little creativity, originality, or effort Very little movement or descriptive gestures.

poor Limited communication of characters feelings, situation and motives. The student has no costume

score

FACIAL EXPRESSION/ BODY LANGUAGE

No movement or descriptive gestures.

Imagination and Creativity

Cooperative work

demonstrate thoughtfulness and completely enhance role play Most of them had a meaningful and relevant role and contribution

It is awareness and developing acceptably enhance role play A few or only one of them had a meaningful and relevant role and contribution demonstrates a low level of performance in role play

demonstrate little awareness and do little to enhance role play. A few or only one of them had a meaningful and relevant role and contribution the performance was very poor

Performance

demonstrates a good performance understanding of their historical figure.

Time

You mostly stayed within the time

You exceeded the

Your message was too short or

Use of Language

time frame, but too long thats okay. Language Language does not Language causes Confusing language contributes to have a negative potential confusion and overwhelming effectiveness of impact or vocalized or vocalized pauses amount of speech or vocalized pauses not distracting are distracting vocalized pauses pauses (um, uh, er, etc.) not distracting

frame.

Total points Additional Comments: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________