Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions

MAT Art Education; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts



A1.
lnLake 8asellne
uaLa
A2.
lnLake 8evlew
81.
lall Mld-1erm
LvenL uaLa
uevelopmenL
82.
lall Mld-1erm
LvenL uaLa
8evlew
C1.
lall Lnd-1erm
uaLa
uevelopmenL
C2.
lall Lnd-1erm
uaLa 8evlew
u1.
Sprlng Mld-
1erm LvenL
uaLa
uevelopmenL
u2.
Sprlng Mld-
1erm LvenL
uaLa 8evlew
L1.
Sprlng Lnd-
1erm uaLa
uevelopmenL
L2.
Sprlng Lnd-
1erm uaLa
8evlew
l.
Annual AssessmenL 8evlew &
8eporL on llndlngs & Acuons
1aken 8ased Cn SLudenL Learnlng
CuLcomes
Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions
MAT Art Education; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts
SOA Degree Program (please enter degree program name):

A1. Intake Data (Audition, Portfolio Review, Other):
Date(s): Prior to matriculation
Activity: Students will supply portfolio of artwork to faculty to review and complete an interview for the purpose of making
recommendations for courses and possible exemption of Praxis 1 tests. Transcripts, recommendations and other application
materials will be reviewed.
Method of Documentation Used: Physical and Electronic portfolios, transcripts, SAT/ACT scores, written evaluation of
audition/interview.
Participants: Studio Art Faculty and Art Education Faculty
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator, Studio Art Coordinator, and Art and Design Faculty as designated for
review team, Graduate Admissions Committee.
A2. Intake Review (Degree Program Faculty):
Date Of Review: Monthly reviews of applying students.
Data Used: Student portfolios of artwork, SAT/ACT scores, transcripts, recommendations.
Key Observations: Determination of strengths and weaknesses, including need or exemption of Praxis 1 and acceptance into the
program.
Actions Taken: Recommendations for acceptance or rejection, coursework to successfully complete Benchmark 1.
Participants: Graduate Art Education Faculty
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator, Dean of Graduate Studies
B1. Fall Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other):
Date(s): October 15
Activity: Faculty assessment of mid-term progress towards course objectives.
Method of Documentation Used: Traditional exams, portfolio reviews and rating/adjudication forms, participation rubric,
attendance.
Participants: Graduate MAT Art Education students
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator and other Benchmark 1 faculty.
B2. Fall Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other)
Date of Review: After Mid-Term
Data Used: Mid-Term Grades and pass rates, rating and adjudication forms, participation and attendance.
Key Observations: Portfolio strengths and weaknesses, articulation of understanding of course goals.
Actions Taken: Personal advisement, additional instruction or recommendations for improvement.
Participants: Graduate MAT Art Education students
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator and other Benchmark 1 faculty.
C1. Fall End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Fall End Term Report, Surveys, External Reviews, Course Evaluations, Other)
Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions
MAT Art Education; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts
Date(s): December
Activity: Formal faculty assessment of end-term progress towards course objectives.
Method of Documentation Used: Traditional exams, portfolio reviews and rating/adjudication forms, participation rubric,
attendance.
Participants: Graduate MAT Art Education students
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator and other Benchmark 1 faculty.
C2. Fall End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office, Other)
Date of Review: January
Data Used: Course Evaluations, pass rates, final grades
Key Observations: Course evaluations reflect course objectives are met; students meet competencies in Benchmark 1 goals.
Actions Taken: Review course goals.
Participants: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
D1. Spring Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other):
Date(s): March
Activity: Faculty assessment of mid-term progress towards program objectives.
Method of Documentation Used: Traditional exams, portfolio reviews and rating/adjudication forms, participation rubric,
attendance.
Participants: Graduate MAT Art Education students
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
D2. Spring Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other)
Date of Review: March
Data Used: Mid-Term Grades and pass rates, rating and adjudication forms, participation and attendance.
Key Observations: Portfolio strengths and weaknesses, articulation of understanding of course and program goals.
Actions Taken: Personal advisement, additional instruction or recommendations for improvement
Participants: Graduate MAT Art Education students
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
E1. Spring End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Event #1 Report, Surveys, External Review Report, Course Evaluations,
Other)
Date(s): May
Activity: Formal faculty assessment of end-term progress towards course and program objectives.
Method of Documentation Used: Traditional exams, portfolio reviews and rating/adjudication forms, participation rubric, course
evaluations, attendance.
Participants: Graduate MAT Art Education students
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions
MAT Art Education; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts
E2. Spring End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office,
Other)
Date of Review: May
Data Used: Course evaluations
Key Observations: Course evaluations reflect course objectives are met; students meet competencies in Benchmark 1 goals.
Actions Taken: Review course and degree program goals.
Participants: Graduate Art Education Coordinator.
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
F. Annual Assessment Review & Report on Findings & Actions Taken (Degree Program Faculty, Dept/School Faculty, Guest
Faculty, Institutional Research Office, Other)
Date of Review: June
Data Used: Fall and Spring Evaluations
Key Observations: Art Education Outcomes and Benchmark 1 met.
Actions Taken: TBD
Curriculum:
Staffing:
Facilities:
Operations:
Procedures/Processes:
Participants: Graduate Art Education Coordinator
Responsible Party: Graduate Art Education Coordinator, Dean of Education and Graduate Studies, Dean of School of the Arts.

Potrebbero piacerti anche