te BP EO : aoe RiP bo a ae BE ‘ ; 3 4 oe « i so ea sono peda eo aprao: promt uma 6008 /29/S0e3e8, una 6002 ONIUES NOTSYNIVAR YOLIMUISNE aNe EsENDD soETION KMOKE aosaus ‘oeeqevea (OC aoe MAS HOUR AUK coogssoa “OT aiodouEnglish Department Course Evaluation ‘Semester and Year: Spring 2009 Course: English 251 Section: 000 Instructor: Brian Croxall 1. What were the strengths of this course and this instructor? Baad Compas 4 aroddy cal 0.0 2 poroer Ae'o wrheeiny ODL down te 2oeA, Ro sprrronasiocy relpsolin Tht edace Yerrause Be etpad mg Lome Juttereetet in he mdrtovint vpoustcor et Rose. THe Coroe Wo SR nmesae eee hecanroe AY Omenten Str aries 2. How could nstustr improve this course? Tho amphoso on Aster corgol be 2200. eht Lo Lnoigy. Maastoable sak one Sr BROW Seer Ut UbLO Jn Dusstory Sb pubsasior erga werk Bt I panp at Sn eee Ses one fon Ea VARLECeOOY 4 Dtvckyas Ione + oh ing st CL est on shag ch was! aking a dustry clato 3. How usefill were the wiki class notes and timelines assignments? How could they be improved? WIL nana ool rimelineg Cadranimnscrd were rodltes coa,Wou AP Collobnrcht with he claso. Naweuer pombtnes WL Wiki nese. OAD Vnconousten bearer solercto rect whet Sthey rink Jorportert, QWog Usk notea on cucussun ong curt Yeon, 4. Of everything we read, which two texts should absolutely be kept on the syllabus for future se. 9 iterations of the course and which two should absolutely be cut and why? fe a Loved 00 of IRQ Womsn WARS andh sig arort keer > Panding Was Cut Comte ase SUDA, We? Shy UCR, Fos “much umsolerniok] rrokist sprctuy 5. What were your expectations for this course? Were they met? In other words, did you learn what you Wanted or needed to? D exported an Amencon LO Ourvey anol af got 4a wtansd lig Onc thougit Uprovabing CLe%0,English Department Course Evaluation Semester and Year: Spring 2009 Course: English 251 Section: 000 Instructor: Brian Croxail 1. What were the strengths of this course and this instructor? inferestig Stories Chooses well organized 7 b rowleckgalle # ergpoing 2. How could the instructor improve this course? Me student wet 3. How useful were the wiki class notes and timelines assignments? How could they be improved? 7 . CLOSS HbkeS — VEY, ULPOI For Studying ip. Y » Y Katine: relevanr in a broad aspect € useful to see. sort of General tne Periods 2 othar events engon during vortkengs 4. Ofeverythiiig we read, which two texts should absolutely be kept on the syllabus for future iterations of the course and which two should absolutely be cut and why? keep: Chowlote Perkins Giwrar The C eying o¢ Lot 44 , Cok: none -all Were Great B relate te broad Huns of class 5. What were your expectations for this course? Were they met? In other words, did you learn what you wanted or needed to? ; & loro overviews of Amarican (it yes — Thue wignQpock Vac ety 19 the Stories Ut Head, Providing a basis’ on wwch fo Fothex Study Rrnexican vores,