‘row pesuiroy TLETEAG see 60 worsenteag ZosoNaeuT HED paaUBTOH 2 be 2 3 bobo 308 E p35 ot fo: x ft Ge fe $ Ee t rO3 OE bore oes x bord ES y ye @ € ¢ F EE Ee i Hob ue zof : Et : oS oF BRE Poiore oe rE 2 3 $b rt oP ES fochacdeulonkvse © & sSexdasuudoztys’s t peregzeaer oat zx tawozyubon e601 {09 ‘Semnoy Beyyes woseoes a yeu 1 orgepeesun/vossodezts 7 — 3 FF orqepeesua,peazodosn 3 3 oreuey 4 i ote 3 ‘oe 3 e yee 3 sraworosu/peazodart : 8 Siete i 4 Se ve x soa etaeprozua/orienur x n ot sone opeso posocnt aet0 ZU semog wovaenyvar 30 sence 9t porto yer0u, 91 :3ueNT TORUS unmpeen swuky uepaa'eemeong izosonaarer ado tet aaa “uoradoe bur waby woancd ‘sere Taomunn S6TS sesersproura ung s00e/so/eoezed une 8002 Tv NOTuMMTWed YOLONALSNT aN Ssundd EOBTIOD x¥OK aoueys sseeqeaea ot on bee AETSHEATR UO cobuasns *ar aedEnglish Department Course Evaluation E Semester and Datel Woh (Ys/o% Course: English (4 Section: O06 Instrocior: (rrvalt 1. What were the strengths of this course and this instructor? Tha nse dw wag ven wall orfatted qanreachadle homorers, aad cleat bug ceurda maa d)! The Garse nabenal UH ew rgugny beics aad pet) we bo pt arales 2uceuty were . How could the instructor improve this course? Perhans pure a OY mere guides, Yrovs\ Ye noteral co wet bald Corey eye ot Ar, vy 3. What id you think of the pdeast assignment? Did it help you engage in a new way with ed ae mene dw earning hows 11 do podearts Than ralersudnng SA my yivileg @ Whtmuds pu eky, Good Gaigqnwad” howl 4, What did you think of the wiki assignment? Did it help you learn how to read literature eee re URAL, TE helped ma generate Febeas abe! Hemrgumats ghorves Gud bo tre pose ce wy Ganchion 6 lolly, 5. What other readings, assignments, and/or exercises did you find most/least helpful and/or teresting and why? . Mi Agneta readings Ltr? pater ol L tejeyed Ym became A find Te core mahesul porbeulest, apagine 6, What were your expectations for this course? Were they met? In other words, did you learn What you wanted or needed t0? Vag THe redwed un wing Mlle and read ome \ é. : grea reel, Expeotade Sy ueert wet,English Department Course Evaluation ‘Semester and Date: Pall 2000 Course: English [Bf Section:_ 08 Instructor: Grign CRoxall : is and this ir rr? 2 ve ie. veally interected mm mis macenal & waits 4ohelphis studen 2. How could the instructor improve this course? Imore thaividval critiguec of writing by profecsac. 3. What did you think of the podcast assignment? Did it help you engage in a new way with ‘Whitman’s poetry and with your writing? Sure, “Lk was relatively easy '» forced us 40 redo) our assigned poems Sentra ree. 4. What did you think of the wiki assignment? Did it help you lean how to read literature more closely and effectively? ; a Sue, Ft made us practice cose reading p hApe vit Learn new things abot Wevexgr 5. What other readings, assignments, and/or exercises did you find most/least helpful and/or interesting and why? 7 The paper with 7% lard SL found very hebptul Sorry Tdoit remember avtn me 6. What were your expectations for this course? Were they met? In other words, did you Jearn what you wanted or needed to? F etpecbed to Learh how ty write/what 1S expected of o paper in a college cqss... a i simply lepends m das and profesor,