Sei sulla pagina 1di 26

Chapter 8

Conflict and
Negotiation

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Chapter Outline
• Conflict Defined
• Sources of Conflict
• From Potential to Actual Conflict
• Conflict Management and Teams
• Negotiation
• Issues in Negotiation

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Conflict and Negotiation
Questions for Consideration
Questions for Consi derat ion
• How do we manage conflict?
• When is conflict functional?
• How do we negotiate?

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Conflict
• A process that begins when one party perceives
that another party has negatively affected, or is
about to negatively affect, something that the
first party cares about.
– Functional
• Supports the goals of the group and
improves its performance
– Dysfunctional
• Hinders group performance

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
How Structure Can Lead to
Conflict
• Stimulating conflict
– Size, specialization, and composition of the
group
– Too much reliance on participation
– Diversity of goals among groups
– Ambiguity in precisely defining where
responsibility for actions lies
– Reward systems where one member’s gain is
at another’s expense
Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Exhibit 8-1 How Conflict
Builds

Conflict-handling Outcomes
Intentions
• Competing • Functional:
• Collaborating increased
• Compromising Behaviour performance
• Avoiding • Dysfunctional:
• Accommodating decreased group
performance

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Conflict-Handling
Intentions
• Two Dimensions
– Cooperativeness
• The degree to which one party attempts to
satisfy the other party’s concerns
– Assertiveness
• The degree to which one party attempts to
satisfy his or her own concerns

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Specific Intentions
• Competing
• A desire to satisfy one’s interests, regardless of
the impact on the other parties.
• Collaborating
• A situation where the parties to a conflict each
desire to satisfy fully the concerns of all parties
• Avoiding
• The desire to withdraw from or suppress a
conflict.
• Accommodating
• The willingness of one party in a conflict to place
the opponent’s interests above his or her own
• Compromising
• A situation in which each party to a conflict is
willing to give up something
Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Exhibit 8-2 Dimensions of
Conflict-Handling
Intentions Assertive

Competing Collaborating
Assertiveness

Compromising
Unassertive

Avoiding Accommodating

Uncooperative Cooperative
Cooperativeness
Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Exhibit 8-4
Conflict Intensity
Continuum
Annihilatory Overt efforts to destroy
conflict the other party

Aggressive physical attacks

Threats and ultimatums

Assertive verbal attacks

Overt questioning or
challenging of others

Minor disagreements or
No misunderstandings
conflict

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Types of Conflict
• Cognitive
– Conflict related to differences in perspectives and
judgments
• Task-oriented
• Results in identifying differences
• Usually functional conflict
• Affective
– Emotional conflict aimed at a person rather than an
issue
• Dysfunctional conflict

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Reducing Group Conflict
• Team members reduced conflict using the
following tactics:
– Worked with more, rather than less, information
– Debated on the basis of facts
– Developed multiple alternatives to enrich the level of
debate
– Shared commonly agreed-upon goals
– Injected humour into the decision process
– Maintained a balanced power structure
– Resolved issues without forcing consensus

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Negotiation
• A process in which two or more parties
exchange goods or services and attempt to agree
upon the exchange rate for them
– Distributive bargaining
• Negotiation that seeks to divide up a fixed
amount of resources; a win-lose situation
– Integrative bargaining
• Negotiation that seeks one or more
settlements that can create a win-win
solution

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Exhibit 8-6 Distributive
versus
Integrative Bargaining
Bargaining Distributive Integrative
Characteristic Bargaining Bargaining

Available resources Fixed amount of Variable amount of resources to


resources to be divided be divided
I win, you lose
Primary motivations I win, you win
Opposed to each other
Primary interests Convergent or congruent with
Short term
each other
Focus of relationships Long term

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
How to Negotiate
• Assess personal goals, consider other’s
goals, develop strategy
• Identify target and resistance points
– Target: what one would like to achieve
– Resistance: lowest outcome acceptable
• Identify BATNA
– Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Issues in Negotiation
• Gender Differences
• Cross-Cultural Differences
• Alcohol and Negotiations
• Third-Party Negotiations

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Gender Differences
• Women
– More inclined to be concerned with feelings and
perceptions, and take a longer-term view
– View the bargaining session as part of an overall
relationship
– Tend to want all parties in the negotiation to be
empowered
– Use dialogue to achieve understanding
• Men
– View the bargaining session as a separate event
– Use dialogue to persuade
Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Alcohol Consumption and
Negotiations
– Negotiators who had been drinking
• Were more aggressive and more likely to
insult, mislead, and threaten their opponent
• Were more likely to make mistakes, saying
such things as "I propose a start date of 12
weeks . . . no, 4 weeks. I'm sorry, I was
confused"
• Were more likely to focus on irrelevant
information or misunderstand the problem
• Were not aware that alcohol had influenced
their performance, when in fact it had

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Alcohol Consumption and
Negotiations
– Sober negotiators
• Were were more likely to look for
win-win solutions
• Did not do well when bargaining
against someone who had been
drinking, as the drinker tended to be
far more aggressive

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Third Party Roles in
Negotiations
• Conciliator
• Mediator
• Arbitrator

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Conciliator
• Trusted third party who provides an
informal communication link between the
negotiator and the opponent
– Informal link
– Used extensively in international, labour,
family and community disputes
– Fact-find, interpret messages, persuade
disputants to develop agreements

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Mediator
• A neutral third party who facilitates a
negotiated solution by using reasoning,
persuasion, and suggestions for alternatives
– Labour-management negotiations and civil court
disputes
– Settlement rate is about 60%; satisfaction rate is
about 75%
– Participants must be motivated to bargain and settle
– Best under moderate levels of conflict
– Mediator must appear neutral and non-coercive

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Arbitrator
• Has authority to dictate an agreement
– Voluntary (requested) or compulsory
(imposed by law or contract)
– Always results in a settlement
– May result in further conflict

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Summary and Implications
• Conflict can be either constructive or destructive
to the functioning of a group.
• An optimal level of conflict:
– Prevents stagnation
– Stimulates creativity
– Releases tension
– And initiates the seeds for change
• Inadequate or excessive levels of conflict can
hinder group effectiveness.

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Summary and Implications
• Don’t assume there's one conflict-handling
intention that is always best.
– Use competition when quick, decisive action is vital
– Use collaboration to find an integrative solution
– Use avoidance when an issue is trivial
– Use accommodation when you find you’re wrong
– Use compromise when goals are important
• Negotiation is an ongoing activity in groups
• Intergroup conflicts can also affect an
organization’s performance.

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Point-CounterPoint
• Conflict Is Good for • All Conflicts Are
the Organization Dysfunctional!
▲ Conflict is a means by which ▲ The negative consequences
to bring about radical change from conflict can be
▲ Conflict facilitates group devastating
cohesiveness ▲ Effective managers build
▲ Conflict improves group and teamwork not conflict
organizational effectiveness ▲ Competition is good for an
▲ Conflict brings about a organization, but not conflict
slightly higher, more ▲ Managers who accept and
constructive level of tension stimulate conflict don’t
survive in organizations

Chapter 8, Stephen P. Robbins and Nancy Langton, Organizational Behaviour, Third Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.

Potrebbero piacerti anche