Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By
Aminul Haque
0402050
Supervisor
We certify that the ideas, designs and experimental work, results, analyses and
conclusions set out in this dissertation are entirely my own effort, except where
otherwise indicated and acknowledged.
we further certify that the work is original and has not been previously submitted
for assessment in any other course or institution, except where specifically stated.
Signature Signature
Date Date
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere thanks to Prof. Dr. Poritosh Kumar
Shadhu Khan for giving us the opportunity to study this phenomenon and for
his help and valuable advice.
we would like to thank Mr. Nurul Alam and Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood from
PDB for their relentless support and motivation in order for us to complete
our bachelor thesis. Especially we want to thank our beloved parents and all
of our friends. They were the pillars and our inspiration and our enthusiasm
infusion to complete our studies and extend our efforts even when the road
started to look dreadfully rocky.
Glossary
Contents
Abstract
Acknowledgement
Certification
Glossary
Nomenclature
6.5 SIMPOW[6]
Introduction
This research area concerns disturbances in a power system network where the voltage
magnitude becomes uncontrollable and collapses. The voltage decline is often
monotonous in the beginning of the collapse and difficult to detect. A sudden increase in
the voltage decline often marks the end of the collapse course. It is not easy to distinguish
this phenomenon from transient stability where voltages also can decrease in a manner
similar to voltage collapse. Only careful post-disturbance analysis may in those cases
reveal the actual cause.
During the last twenty years there have been one or several large voltage collapses almost
every year somewhere in the world. The reason is the increased number of
interconnections and a higher degree of utilization of the power system. Also load
characteristics have changed. Two examples are the increased use of air conditioners and
electrical heating appliances which may endanger system stability radically. The
incidents that lead to a real breakdown of the system are rare, but when they occur they
Have large repercussions on the stability of power systems. It is believed by many
professionals that the power system will be used with a smaller margin to voltage
collapse in the future. The reasons are twofold: the need to use the invested capital
efficiently, and the public resistance to building new transmission lines and new power
plants. Voltage stability is therefore believed to be of greater concern in the future.
Nearly all types of contingencies and even slow-developing load increases could cause a
voltage stability problem. The time scale for the course of events which develop into a
collapse varies from seconds to several tens of minutes. This makes voltage collapse
difficult to analyze since there are many phenomena that interact during this time.
Important factors that cause interaction during a voltage decline are among others:
generation limitation, behavior of on-load tap changers, and load behavior. An interesting
point is that many researchers discard voltage magnitude as a suitable indicator for the
proximity to voltage collapse, although this is in fact the quantity that collapses. One
question that has been discussed is whether voltage stability is a static or dynamic
process. Today it is widely accepted as a dynamic phenomenon but much analysis is
performed using static models.
Another approach is presented by Glavitch. In this approach different time frames of the
collapse phenomenon are illustrated:
• Transient voltage stability or collapse is characterized by a large disturbance and a rapid
response of the power system and its components, e.g. induction motors. The time frame
is one to several seconds which is also a period in which automatic control devices at
generators react.[1]
• Longer-term voltage stability or collapse is characterized by a large disturbance and
subsequent process of load restoration or load change of load duration. The time frame is
within 0.5-30 minutes. Glavitch also proposes a distinction between static and dynamic
analysis. If differential equations are involved, the analysis is dynamic. “Static does not
mean constant, i.e. a static analysis can very well consider a time variation of a
parameter.”[1]&[6]
Of these definitions, Hill seems to be the closest to mathematics and the IEEE-definition
is related to the actual process in the network. The framework in these definitions on
voltage stability includes mainly three issues: the voltage levels must be acceptable; the
system must be controllable in the operating point; and it must survive a contingency or
change in the system.
The Belgian collapse in August 4, 1982 also had problems with the transmission
capacity. The collapse was initiated by a fortuitous tripping of one of the relatively few
operating production sources. The low load made it economically advantageous to use
[5]just a few plants for production. This resulted in that they were operating quite close to
their operating limits. When the generator tripped the surrounding area was exposed to a
lack of reactive power and several generators were field current limited. After a while the
generators tripped one after another due to the operation of the protection system. During
this period, the transmission system was unable to transmit the necessary amount of
reactive power to the voltage suppressed area and this caused a continuous voltage
decline. When the fifth generator was tripped, the transmission-protective relays
separated the system and a collapse resulted .
The collapse in Canada, in B. C Hydros north coast region in July 1979 is also interesting
in this respect. A loss of 100 MW load along a tie-line connection resulted in an
increased active power transfer between the two systems. The generators close to the
initial load loss area were on manual excitation control (constant field current), which
aggravated the situation. When voltages started to fall along the tie-line due to the
increased power transfer, the connected load decreased proportionally to the voltage
squared. This increased the tie-line transmission even more since there was no reduction
in the active power production. About one minute after the initial contingency, the
voltage in the middle of the tie-line fell to approximately 0.5 pu and the tie-line was
tripped due to over current at one end and due to a distance relay at the other.
On 23 July 1987, Tokyo suffered from very hot weather. After the lunch hour, the load
pick-up was ~1%/min. Despite the fact that all the available shunt capacitors were put
into the system, the voltages started to decay on the 500 kV-system. In 20 minutes the
voltage had fallen to about 0.75 pu and the protective relays disconnected parts of the
transmission network and by that action shed about 8000 MW of load. Unfavourable load
characteristics of air conditioners were thought to be part of the problem .
In the collapse in Sweden, on 27 December 1983, the load behaviour at low voltage
levels was also a probable source leading to a collapse . Transmission capacity from the
northern part of Sweden was lost due to an earth fault. Virtually nothing happened the
first ~50 seconds after the initial disturbance when the remaining transmission lines from
the northern part of Sweden were tripped. Since these lines carried over 5500 MW, the
power deficit in southern Sweden was too large for the system to survive. The cause of
the cascaded line trippings was a voltage decline and a current-increase in the central part
of Sweden. The on-load tap changer transformers contributed to the collapse when they
restored the customer voltage level. Field measurements performed afterwards in the
Swedish network have also shown the inherent load recovery after a voltage decrease .
This recovery aggravated the situation when voltages started to decline. The cause of this
load recovery in the Swedish network is believed to be due to electrical heating
appliances.
On the fourth of November 2004, a prolonged voltage dip was experienced at Blackwater
132kV Substation located in Central Queensland. The voltage fluctuation corresponded
to a decrease of 6% of nominal voltage (132kV) for approximately 9 minutes as indicated
in Figure 3. Events of this type affecting Power Quality are of concern as failure to
comply with regulatory limits for voltage magnitude, balance and frequency results in
penalties by regulatory authorities such as the National Electricity Market Management
Company (NEMMCO) and possible litigation by industrial customers adversely affected
by such failures.
Fig1.3: Blackwater 132kV Bus Voltage (Jones, R 2005, pers. comm., 22 March)
Blackwater substation voltage levels are regulated by a device called a Static Var
Compensator (SVC). Immediately prior to the voltage dip the SVC was providing
transmission system voltage support, operating in capacitive mode. As shown by the
voltage.
Chapter 2
2.1 Overview
Voltage instability occurs when the reactive power available to a portion of the grid falls
below that required by customers, transmission lines, and transformers in that portion of the grid.
The period of "instability" is not so much an instability as it is the behavior and interaction of
various elements following the instant when the reactive shortage first develops and until
intervention occurs, voltage collapse occurs, or, hopefully, a stable voltage is reached. This
period of "slow dynamics" involves generator excitation limiting controls, on-load tap changers,
operator actions, and the response of customer loads to decaying voltage (e.g., thermostats and
manual activities that respond to the decaying voltage and attempt to restore the load to its
original demand in spite of decaying voltage). As voltage decays, the resulting drop in customer
load allows continued operation. However, the action of distribution transformer on-load-tap
changers and self-restoring load elements pull voltage ever lower. While voltage may stabilize in
systems with relatively strong ties to healthy neighbors, others will require heroic action by
operators or under voltage load shedding to prevent voltage collapse.
Area, the angle between points where voltage is being controlled can reach the critical
ninety degree point where the well-understood steady state instability results.[13]
The second possible voltage collapse mechanism is stalling motors. Motors typically stall
when voltage drops below about 80% of nominal at the terminals of the motor. At this
voltage motor torque falls below load torque and the motor slows to a standstill where it
draws a large reactive Current further depressing voltage. Since the first motor to stall
will pull voltage lower and cause nearby motors to also stall, it is the one of concern.
That motor may be overloaded or served at a lower than rated voltage and thus may stall
at 85% or higher. Clearly, grid voltage much below 90% puts any load area at risk of
voltage collapse from stalling motors. While some low voltage protection does exist on
industrial motors, it is typically set at about 90% voltage and operates slowly since its
intended function is to prevent thermal damage. The "protection" that is referenced in the
Interim Report that disconnects larger motors and industrial motors during voltage
collapse is in fact not protection, but the inherent behavior of electromagnetically held
contactors that are used in motor "starters" to switch the motors on and off. The contactor
simply opens when voltage drops into the 60 to 70% range.
Motors in most industrial light industrial plants are served by contactors and will drop
from the system as voltage falls due to motor stalling or angular instability. Refrigeration
loads (A/C, residential and grocery refrigeration) are “trip-free” and leave the system
only after overload devices “time-out.” This can take 10 to 20 seconds. While in some
situations the self-shedding of industrial motors occurs early enough in the voltage decay
to prevent cascading from angular instability and cascade motor stalling, but where A/C
and refrigeration motor content is high, the loss of industrial motors is unlikely to halt the
cascading.
It is not unusual for a voltage instability event to lead to both angular instability and
motor stalling. Because angular instability depresses voltage and inevitably causes motor
stalling, and motor stalling depresses voltage and can cause angular instability, it can be
difficult to assign the cause to one or the other when an event involves both. The
difficulty in identifying motor stalling and angular instability in the procession of a
voltage collapse can be complicated by the operation of distance protection on
transmission lines. While there is no doubt that angular instability will cause distance
protection on transmission lines to operate (in the absence of out-of-step blocking), it is
also possible for the large reactive flows and low voltages from motor stalling to cause
the same distance protection to operate
Though it is now widely recognized that voltage is not usually a good early indicator of
voltage instability, whenever that observation is made, it should also be pointed out that
the period of diminishing reactive reserves that precedes the decay in voltage is fairly
easy to detect in real time and to evaluate in operations planning studies. Some control
centers have real time reactive margin displayed for operator use. This is readily done for
areas that can be identified as being at risk of reactive problems and less readily done
where the area of reactive shortage can take any shape and is only identifiable once
Contingencies have occurred and created a reactive short area. Nonetheless, there are
voltage security analysis tools that have been developed to address this problem.
Generation excitation control on voltage collapse is one of the important causes. Till now
an infinite bus was assumed at the sending end. But no bus is an infinite section it is
assumed that a synchronous generator is driving the sending end bus. With increasing
load, the line current increases and machine excitation increase terminal voltage constant.
But soon the machine field current reaches the ceiling further increase in line current the
terminal voltage decreases. Decreasing terminal further decrease in receiving end voltage
and results in further voltage collapse. Upper limit on field current of generator is to
aggravate the voltage collapse at receiving In fact the problem is more complicated than
that. When the collapse process is fast increases fast. If the excitation system of generator
is slow, the terminal voltage keep up with the increasing line current and collapse process
will be further intensified sending voltage conditions - even though field current has not
reached ceiling excitation system simulates infinite bus better.
Voltage collapse with composite Loads, at a load bus varies in a complex fashion with
voltage and is neither dynamic. Modeling the load as a composite of equivalent static
load and at the bus has been attempted by various researchers. While induction motor
load tends to induce voltage instability and disturbances and load disturbances, static
loads tend to tone down the voltage during same conditions. Of course, sustained low
voltage conditions will exist if line is over-loaded. But dynamic loads can provoke
instability even system under contingencies. A good mix of static load and induction
motor long way towards curbing the tendency to voltage instability. As already pointed
out, it is the interplay between bus voltage elasticity and reactive power elasticity with
respect to bus voltage that decides voltage any measure that tends to reduce bus voltage
sensitivity with respect to voltage instability. These measures will include i) reducing the
electrical generator and load buds (use of parallel lines, series compensation etc) flow in
the line by shunt capacitor compensation at load bus. The first method (a tight bus
approaches infinite bus; its short circuit MVA is high) maximum power transfer
capability whereas the second measure shifts regions where bus voltage is less sensitive
to power variations. Similarly, make P & Q of load elastic with respect to voltage will aid
in maintaining automatic secondary voltage regulation either by utility or by detrimental
from voltage stability point of view. Similarly a slow response fast response in capacitor
switching systems or use of SVC, fast responding generator etc. are seen to be helpful in
curtailing voltage instability. mention is that capacitors can save a system from voltage
collapse due are switched on right at the inception of instability or preferably before .that
automatically controlled fast responding static var compensators become capacitors for
management of voltage collapse. A typical spontaneous voltage collapse (i.e. not due to
overload, but due to instability system or load disturbances) takes about 15 minutes to 30
minutes for competition. Drop is slow during the beginning but toward the end of the
voltage collapse interval decisive turns and flops down fast. The exact evolution of
collapse will be governed static and dynamic loads, loading level of equivalent induction
motor changer dynamics, action taken by operators, injection of shunt compensation,
equipment functioning etc.
Voltage collapse in a general power system behind a particular load bus may be
equivalence equivalent in the form of a voltage source (infinite bus) in series with a
reactance at that bus). Thus, the voltage stability at a load bus may be studied using
covered till now. However, this Thevenin’s equivalent method suffers from a
shortcoming. Load at a bus change the voltages everywhere (not only at that particular
bus) change voltage stability at a particular node is tied up with voltage stability at other
nodes large extent depending on electrical distances between the nodes. The principles
enumerated and the qualitative conclusions arrived at in the case link are valid for any
load bus in a general power system. But the exact quantitative of voltage stability
margins at the various load buses will require complex computations due to the coupling
which exists between various load nodes.
Chapter 3
The rapid change in the electric load profile from being mainly a linear type to greatly
nonlinear, has created continued power quality problems which are difficult to detect and
is in general complex. The most important contributor to power quality problems is the
customers’ (or end-user electric loads) use of sensitive type nonlinear load in all sectors
(Industrial, Commercial and Residential).
Power Quality issues can be roughly broken into a number of sub-categories:
Harmonics (integral, sub, super and interharmonics)
Voltage swells, sags, fluctuations, flicker and Transients
Voltage magnitude and frequency, voltage imbalance
Hot grounding loops and ground potential rise (GPR)
Monitoring and measurement of quasi-dynamic, quasi-static and transient type
phenomena.
Nonlinear type loads contribute to the degradation in the electric supply’s Power Quality
through the generation of harmonics. The increased use of nonlinear loads makes the
harmonic issue (waveform distortion) a top priority for all equipment manufacturers,
users and electric utilities. Severe Power System harmonics are usually the steady state
problem not the transient or intermittent type, and these harmonics can be mitigated by
using the new family of modulated/switched power filters.
Lower order harmonics cause the greatest concern in the electrical distribution/utilization
system. Harmonics interfere with sensitive-type electronic communications and
networks. Low order triple harmonics cause hot-neutrals, grounding potential rise (GPR),
light flickering, malfunction of computerized data processing equipment and computer
networks and computer equipment.
There are several defined measures commonly used for indicating the harmonic severity
and content of a waveform. One of the most common measures is total harmonic
distortion in current (THD) i .
∞
∑I 2
n
(THD i ) = n=2 ;
I1
Where I 1 : Fundamental (60Hz) Current; n: Harmonic order and I n : Harmonic current.
In an electrical power system, there are various kinds of power quality disturbances. They
are classified into categories and their descriptions are important in order to classify
measurement results and to describe electromagnetic phenomena, which can cause power
quality problems. Some disturbances come from the supply network, whereas others are
produced by the load itself. The categories can be classified below
• Transients
• Voltage imbalance
• Waveform distortion
• Voltage fluctuation
Sag
A sag (also known as dip) is a reduction to between 0.1 and 0.9 pu in rms voltage or
current at the power frequency for a short period of time from 0.5 cycles to 1 min. A 10%
sag is considered an event during which the RMS voltage decreased by 10% to 0.9 pu.
Voltage sags are widely recognized as among the most common and important aspects of
power quality problems affecting industrial and commercial customers. They are
particularly troublesome Since they occur randomly and are difficult to predict. Voltage
sags are normally associated with system faults on the distribution system, sudden
increase in system loads, lightning strikes or starting of large load like induction motors.
It is not possible to eliminate faults on a system. One of the most common causes of
faults occurring on high-voltage transmission systems is a lightning strike. When there is
a fault caused by a lightning strike, the voltage can sag to 50% of the standard range and
can last from four to seven cycles. Most loads will be tripped off when encounter this
type of voltage level. Possible effect of voltage sags would be system shutdown or reduce
efficiency and life span of electrical equipment, particularly motors.
Equipment sensitivity to voltage sag occurs randomly and has become the most serious
power quality problem affecting many industries and commercial customers presently.
An industrial monitoring program determined an 87% of voltage disturbances could be
associated to voltage sags. Most of the faults on the utility transmission and distribution
system are single line-to-ground faults (SLGF).
Swell
Interruption
An interruption occurs when there is a reduction of the supply voltage or load current to
less than 0.1 pu for duration not exceeding 1 min. Possible causes would be circuit
breakers responding to overload, lightning and faults. Interruptions are the result of
equipment failures, power system faults and control malfunctions. They are characterized
by their duration as the voltage magnitude is always less than 10% of the nominal. The
duration of an interruption can be irregular when due to equipment malfunctions or loose
connections. The duration of an interruption due to a fault on the utility system is
determined by the utility protective devices operating time.
Over voltage
An overvoltage is defined as an increase in the rms ac voltage greater than 110% at the
power frequency for duration longer than 1 min. Overvoltages can be the result of
switching off a large load, energizing a capacitor bank or incorrect tap settings on
transformers. These occur mainly because either the voltage controls are inadequate or
the system is too weak for voltage regulation. Possible effect could be hardware failure in
the equipment due to overheating.
Under voltage
Transients
Transients can be classified into two categories, namely, impulsive and oscillatory. These
terms reflect the wave shape of a current or voltage transient.
Impulsive Transient
An impulsive transient is defined as a sudden, non-power frequency change in the steady-
state condition of voltage, current, or both, which is unidirectional in polarity (either
positive or negative). Impulsive transients are usually measured by their rise and decay
times and also their main frequency. Lightning is the most common cause of impulsive
transients. The shape of impulsive transients can be changed quickly by circuit
components and may have different characteristics when viewed from different parts of
the power system when high frequencies are involved. Impulsive transients can even
stimulate the natural frequency of power system circuits and produce oscillatory
transients.
Oscillatory Transient
Voltage Imbalance
Voltage imbalance (or unbalance) is a condition in which the maximum deviation from
the average of the three-phase voltages or currents, divided by the average of the three-
phase voltages or currents, expressed in percentage. Voltage imbalance can be the result
of blown fuses in one phase of a three-phase capacitor bank. Severe voltage imbalance
greater than 5% can cause damage to sensitive equipments.
Waveform Distortion
Waveform distortion is a condition whereby a steady-state deviates from an ideal sine
wave of power frequency characterized by the main frequency of the deviation. There are
generally five types of waveform distortion, namely, dc offset, harmonics,
interharmonics, notching and noise.
DC Offset
DC offset is the presence of a dc current or voltage in an ac power system. This can occur
due to the effect of half-wave rectification. Direct current found in alternating current
networks can have a harmful effect. This can cause additional heating and destroy the
transformer.
Harmonic
Harmonics are a growing problem for both electricity suppliers and users. A harmonic is
defined as a sinusoidal component of a periodic wave or quantity having a frequency that
is an integral multiple of the fundamental frequency usually 50Hz or 60Hz. Harmonic
refers to both current and voltage harmonics. Harmonic voltages occur as a result of
current harmonics, which are created by electronic loads. These nonlinear loads will draw
a distorted current waveform from the supply system. The amount of current distortion is
dependent upon the kVA rating of the load, the types of load and the fault level of the
power system at the point where the load is connected.
Industrial loads like electric arc furnaces, and discharge lighting can cause harmonic
distortion. The effect of harmonics in the power system includes the corruption and loss
of data, overheating or damage to sensitive equipment and overloading of capacitor
banks. The high frequency harmonics may also cause interference to nearby
telecommunication system.
Fourier analysis can be used to describe distortion in terms of fundamental frequency and
harmonic components from a given distorted periodic waveform. By using this technique,
we can consider each component of the distorted wave separately and apply
superposition. Using the Fourier series expansion, we can represent a distorted periodic
waveshape by its fundamental and harmonic: It is also common to use a single quantity,
the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) as a measure of the effective value of harmonic
distortion. The development of Current Distortion Limits is to:
• Reduce the harmonic injection from each single consumer so that they will not
cause unacceptable voltage distortion levels for normal system characteristics.
• Restrict the overall harmonic distortion of the system voltage supplied by the
utility.
The harmonic distortion caused by each single consumer should be limited to an
acceptable level and the whole system should be operated without existing harmonic
distortion. The harmonic distortion limits recommended here provide the maximum
allowable current distortion for a consumer.
Interharmonics
Interharmonics are defined as voltages or currents having frequency components that are
not integer multiples of the frequency at which the supply system is designed to operate.
The causes include induction motors, static frequency converters and arcing devices. The
Noise
Noise is unwanted distortion of the electrical power signals with high frequency
waveform superimposed on the fundamental. Noise is a common source by
electromagnetic interference (EMI) or radio frequency interference (RFI), power
electronic devices, switching power supplies and control circuits. Noise disturbs
electronic devices such as microcomputer and programmable controllers. Use of filters
and isolation transformers can usually solve the problem.
Voltage Fluctuation
Voltage fluctuation is defined as the random variations of the voltage envelope where the
magnitude does not exceed the voltage ranges of 0.9 to 1.1 pu. Flicker usually associates
with loads that display continuous variations in the load current magnitude causing
voltage variations. The flicker signal is measured by its rms magnitude expressed as a
percent of the fundamental whereas voltage flicker is measured with respect to the
sensitivity of human eye. It is possible for lamp to flicker if the magnitudes are as low as
0.5% and the frequencies are in the range of 6 to 8 Hz. One common cause of voltage
fluctuations on utility transmission and distribution system is the arc furnace.
Any deviation of the power system fundamental frequency from its nominal value
(usually 50 or 60 Hz) is defined as power frequency variations. The power system
frequency is associated with the rotational speed of the generators supplying the system.
The size and duration of the frequency shift depends on the load characteristics and the
response of the generation control system to load changes. As the load and generation
changes, small variations in frequency occur.
Frequency variations can be the cause of faults on power transmission system, large load
being disconnected or a large source of generation going off-line. Frequency variations
usually occur for loads that are supplied by a generator isolated from the utility system.
The response to sudden load changes may not be sufficient to adjust within the narrow
bandwidth required by frequency sensitive equipment. Possible effect could result in data
loss, system crashes and equipment damage.
Chapter 4
4.1 Overview
Static voltage instability is mainly associated with reactive power imbalance. Reactive
power support that the bus receives from the systems can limit load ability of that bus. If
the reactive power support reaches the limit, the system will approach the maximum
loading point or voltage collapse point. In static voltage stability, slowly developing
changes in the power system occur that eventually lead to a shortage of reactive power
and declining voltage. This phenomenon can be seen from the plot of the voltage at
receiving end versus the power transferred. The plots are popularly referred to as P-V
curve or “Nose” curve. As the power transfer increases, the voltage at the receiving end
decreases. Eventually, the critical (nose) point, the point at which the system reactive
power is out of use, is reached where any further increase in active power transfer will
lead to very rapid decrease in voltage magnitude. Before reaching the critical point, the
large voltage drop due to heavy reactive power losses can be observed. The maximum
load that can be increased prior to the point at which the system reactive power is out of
use is called static voltage stability margin or loading margin of the system. The only way
to save the system from voltage collapse is to reduce the reactive power losses in the
transmission system or to add additional reactive power prior to reaching the point of
voltage collapse. This has to be carried out in the planning stage with several system-
wide studies.
In static voltage stability study, Continuation Power Flow (CPF) and optimization
methods are the main analysis techniques and they are used to find voltage stability
margin or loading margin (LM) of the system. Utilities and researchers are developing
software based on these techniques, for the study. The CPF technique involves in solving
a series of load flow calculation with predictor and corrector steps. Optimization
technique involves in solving equations of necessary conditions based on an objective
function and constraints. However, utilities or researchers require devoting a Great deal
of effort to create a program. Adding to this, they may face a difficulty to ensure the
correct answers.
This elasticity may be quantitatively & where P, Q, V are active power, reactive
power and voltage of conditions these factors are generally negative. Power system loads
are generally dependent on voltage and frequency. The reactive power loading (i.e.
constant, independent of bus voltage) quite often and other similar studies, is , at best a
mathematical idealization of the power In general, the loads take active power and
reactive power as functions example, a constant admittance load draws active & reactive
power, which square of voltage.
A load is called static if the power taken by the load is dependent only frequently changes
in voltage collapse analysis) and not on time. Impedance load, lighting load, a constant
current load etc are static loads. By these loads vary in time it is because the voltage
varies with time and with the voltage in such loads.
4.3 Static Voltage Algorithm
The transmission system can be represented using a hybrid representation, by the
following set of equations
The H matrix can be evaluated from the Y bus matrix by a partial inversion, where the
voltages at the load buses are exchanged against their currents. This representation can
then be used to define a voltage stability indicator at the load bus, namely Lj which is
given by,
Where,
Where,
The complex power term component S jcorr represents the contributions of the other
loads in the system to the index evaluated at the node j.
It was demonstrated in earlier works that when a load bus approaches a steady state
voltage collapse situation, the index L approaches the numerical value 1.0. Hence for a
system wide voltage stability assessment, the index evaluated at any of the buses must be
less than unity. Thus the index value L gives an indication of how far the system is from
voltage collapse.
From the derivation it is seen that for computing L index, at any load bus, one requires
only the knowledge of the state variables, power information and the network topology.
These measurements can be obtained very quickly in real-time. Since most of the earlier
indices developed on the basis of steady state power flow model has been able to estimate
the system for a dynamic phenomenon like voltage stability, the authors felt worthwhile
to explore the applicability of the index L for predicting a dynamic voltage collapse
situation.
In fact the conclusions applicable for any static load where and where
n 0 ,n=m=2 represent constant admittance, n=m=1 represent constant current The load
power characteristics of a constant admittance load is shown in fig4 curve A. In this case
there will be in general, only one operating point. Also it is clear no question of the load
demanding more power that the maximum power. As the load operating point shifts
along the line characteristics and gets in to positive slope region load B in fig 4. Also the
effect of power factor on the operating point can
With a static load, all operating points are generally stable i.e. line operates maybe with a
very low load voltage, high current and low efficiency) everywhere. Is in step with load
change. The voltage variation with time is decided by load variation for every load there
is a fixed voltage and voltage does not run away with load remaining at a constant level.
Thus, in this case collapse can take place only if the fig4. The load is assumed to be at
upf and is assumed to vary from a low value to minutes linearly. The corresponding
voltage variation is shown.
If the line is operating near the critical point but in the upper portion of the change in load
conductance can cause a disproportionate drop in the voltage. the conductance will result
in an increase in power delivered, as it should.
But if load conductance is taken to such a level where operating point is in the of the
curve, not only that there is abnormal voltage drop and excessive heating of high current)
but also the power delivered comes down. In this region, when power increased by
increasing the load, what we get is a decreased power delivery. In this lose the
controllability of power in this operating region. The same kind of voltage collapse and
inefficient operation can result in the cases a line in a parallel line link (ii) loss of
capacitor in a series compensated link even load power change. The effect of increase in
the link impedance is to shift maximum curve to the left.
To sum up, with a static load, abnormal reduction of voltage and stable operation
voltages can result as a consequence of over-loading or increase in line impedance. Under
such conditions will be quite loss due to high line currents. However there is away
phenomenon associated with static load in general. Of course, where line operation the
critical point, small changes in load will result in large changes in voltage and large line
efficiency. The collapse is more severe and faster if the load is at a low.
Chapter 5
5.1 Overview
Power transmission capability has traditionally been limited by either angle stability or by
the thermal loading capabilities of the lines. But with the developments in faster short
circuit clearing times, quicker and effective excitation systems and developments in
several stability control devices, the system problems associated with transient instability
have been largely reduced. However, voltage instability limits are becoming more
prominently significant in the context of a secure power system operation. In the
deregulated power market regime, economic competition has lead to an interest in
maintaining an optimum, secure and reliable power system operation. One such security
issue is the voltage stability of the system. Several voltage instability incidents have been
Reported, in the recent past, all over the globe. These are results of operating the system
with very less voltage stability margin under normal conditions. Thus, lot of work is
being carried out to understand voltage stability better, to detect it faster.
Traditional methods of voltage stability investigation have relied on static analysis using
the conventional power flow model. This analysis has been practically viable because of
the view that the voltage collapse is a relatively slow process thus being primarily
considered as a small signal phenomenon. The various analytical tools classified under
steady state analysis mode have been able to address the otherwise dynamic phenomenon
of voltage collapse. A variety of tools like the P-V curve, Q-V curve, eigenvalue, singular
value, sensitivity and energy based methods have been proposed. They are
computationally intensive which makes it less viable for fast computation during a
sequence of discontinuities like generators hitting field current or reactive limits, tap
changer limits, switchable shunt capacitor’s susceptance limits etc. In a dynamic voltage
stability computation regime, considering all these discontinuities into the analysis are
necessary. Moreover, a quick computation is necessary to take necessary corrective
action in time to save the system from an impending voltage collapse.
Where x are the state variables, and y are the algebraic variables, usually bus voltages.
Load model
Voltage sensitive load can be modeled as
Where are P0 is the real power at V=1.0 pu, Q0 is the reactive power at V=1.0 pu, V is
the bus voltage magnitude, β is the voltage sensitivity exponent of the real power, and η
is the voltage sensitivity exponent of the reactive power. Thus, with β=2, and η=2 , the
load becomes a constant impedance type. Dynamic loads are modeled as induction
motors. The load at one node can be represented as a combination of different kinds of
loads, e.g. one portion of the load is consumed by an impedance load and the rest could
be modeled as dynamic induction motor loads.
Generator modeling
Several different types of exciters may be installed within a system, such as the DC1A,
ST1A, and ST3A etc. Some generators may be equipped with PSS, and a
turbine/governor sub-system.
ULTC(under load tap changers modeling)
A ULTC can automatically adjust and keep the load-side bus voltage constant given that
enough buck or boost taps exist. A model of the ULTC is shown as follows:[19]
Here d is the step size of the transformer and n is the turn ratio. and
Time delays of ULTC action at the first instance is usually much longer than the time
delays associated with successive actions of the ULTC. Each ULTC has finite (usually
32) taps and step size is usually 0.000625.
Stated in slightly more formal terms, the behaviour of a system is described by a set of
differential equations. At every time step of the simulation, the time derivative of each
state variable in the system is calculated, using the constant and variable parameters
which describe the system condition at that time instant as initial conditions. The state
variable values at the next time step (statenew) are determined from the present value of
each state variable (stateold) and its rate of change (i.e., its time derivative). Simulation
time is advanced and the process is repeated. In the form of a formal equation the
procedure mentioned above will be:[12]
Fig5.2: Basic logic flow for Dynamic Simulation
The dynamic model proposed by Karlsson is a special case of a dynamic load model
given by Hill. The model implemented is described by the following equations:
When there is a voltage drop of 5-10% on load nodes, field measurements show that αt is
around 2. This means that the transient behavior of the load can be regarded as constant
impedance. In most of the measurements, αs is well below 1, which indicates a changed
voltage dependence for the active power, and the load characteristic tends to be more like
constant power. The time constant Tpr for this changing phase is around some hundred
seconds. This phenomenon has been explained by the power characteristic in electrical
domestic heating.
Software Specification
Introduction
In order to simulate voltage collapse it is important to have suitable software since
dynamic effects can be both of a fast and a slow nature. Voltage collapse can occur not
only as the immediate consequence of a contingency, but can also be the result of
changes in system conditions due to restoration of loads, limitation of generator currents
or capacitor/reactor switching etc. These varying conditions will increase the demands on
the solution algorithms used in the program. It is also important to be able to implement
user-written models of the equipment used in the system since there is no model library
that covers all details or models of the equipment used in power systems. According to
the requirements mentioned above, the PSS/E1 program was suitable for voltage collapse
simulations. The outcome of that PSS/E met the requirements regarding long-term
dynamic simulation and model implementation, though it has to be mentioned that
comparison with other software was not made.
Structure
PSS/E is an integrated, interactive program for simulating, analyzing and optimizing
power system performance. The program contains a set of modules which handle a
number of different power system analysis calculations. All the modules operate from the
same set of data whose structure is divided into four different “working files”, shown in
figure . These working files are set up in a way that optimizes the computational aspects
of the key power system simulation functions: network solution and equipment dynamic
modeling. The user has a variety of ways of operating PSS/E, depending upon the type of
study being performed. However, he never needs to address these working files by name,
though he must be aware that he is processing these files every time he uses PSS/E. The
modules used for voltage collapse simulations are Power flow, Dynamic simulation and
Extended term dynamic simulation.
The four working files have the following names and general functions:
LFWORK Contains a complete set of power flow data (Load Flow WORKing file)
FMWORKWorking file for all operations involving the factorized system admittance
matrix (Factorized Matrix WORKing file).
SCWORK Working files for fault analysis (Short Circuit WORKing file).
DSWORK Scratch files for dynamic simulation activities (Dynamic Simulation
WORKing file).
Power flow or load flow consists of solving real and reactive power balance equations at
all buses in power systems to obtain all state variables when control variables are
specified. According to this, Symbolic toolbox in MATLAB can be used to create power
flow equations when the system data and control variables are known. Then, a simple
command called “lsqnonlin” in Optimization toolbox is used to find the solution for all
state variables. The steps behind the proposed method can be summarized as shown in
the Fig.
From Fig., system parameters are read from input data to create power balance equations
using Symbolic toolbox. The solution is then found by using a single “lsqnonlin”
command. It can be noticed that Jacobian is not required to compute in the formulation
process since it is already embedded in Optimization toolbox. The solution is found in a
simple way, as only one command is used.
Continuation Power Flow is basically a series of load flow calculation with predictor and
corrector steps. The formation of CPF is complicated and it is required good
programming skill. However, with the help of Symbolic and Optimization toolboxes, the
formulation is much easier. Figure 3 illustrates steps behind the CPF process with
Symbolic and Optimization toolboxes. From Fig. 3, the system data is read first, and then
Symbolic toolbox is introduced to create power flow equations. The power flow
calculation is performed to find the load flow Jacobean for the following predictor step.
In the predictor step, state variables are predicted from the current status of load flow
Jacobian to predict the bus angles and voltages at higher LF. In the corrector step, the
actual value of state variables are computed from load flow equations and initial
condition obtained from the predictor step. Prior to the collapse point, parameterization
step is performed to avoid convergence difficulty of CPF process by switching state
variable from LF to the voltage at the weakest bus, which is found from a bus having
highest voltage decrease. The process is repeated until the PV curve is completed.
6.4 EXTAB
The EXSTAB program, developed by Tokyo Electric Power Company and General
Electric, allows for dynamic simulation over an extended range of the time domain.
Explicit as well as implicit integration technique is used. The program includes detailed
models of AGC with frequency and interchange control, power plants, dynamic and
thermostatically controlled loads, OLTC's, and many protective functions. Simulation
modes allow for automatic continuously variable time step integration, as well as a fast
algebraic quasi-steady state mode for slowly varying system conditions.
6.5 SIMPOW
SIMPOW (simulation of power systems), developed by ABB Power Systems AB, covers
dynamic simulations in a wide range of time. The program is used for all types of static
and dynamic simulations of electrical power systems: long term, short term and fast
transients caused by switching and lightning, etc. SIMPOW has models of most power
system elements but the user-oriented Dynamic Simulation Language (DSL), allows
implementation of power system elements which are not available in the standard library
of models.
6.6 ETMSP
ETMSP (Extended Transient/Midterm Stability Program), developed by Ontario Hydro,
has been enhanced to meet the modeling requirements for dynamic analysis of voltage
stability. These include representation of transformer LTC action, generator field current
Limits, dynamic loads, constant energy loads, special relaying, and under voltage load
shedding.
6.7 LTSP
LTSP (Long Term Stability Program) is capable of simulating fast as well as slow
dynamics of power systems and is based on the ETMSP program. In addition to all the
features of ETMSP, LTSP includes detailed models for fossil-fuelled, nuclear, and
combustion turbine plants. The basis for and the details of modeling and solution
techniques used in these programs can be found in.
Chapter 7
We assume that the system Ax = b has been rearranged so that for each row of A the
diagonal elements[8]
have magnitudes that are greater than the sum of the remaining elements in the
corresponding row. That is,
|ai,i| > (sum (j=1 to n) |ai,j|) - ai,i i =1,2,3...n
This is a sufficient noation for both this method and the one that follows to converge.
We begin with an initial approximation to the solution vector, which we store in the
vector: old_x
For i = 1 to n
b[i] - b[i]/a[i,i]
new_x[i] = old_x[i]
a[i,j] = a[i,j]/a[i,i]: j = 1,...n and i <> j
End For i
Repeat
For i = 1 to n
old_x[i] = new_x[i]
new_x[i] = b[i]
End for i
For i = 1 to n
For i = 1 to n
If (j !=i) then
new_x[i] = new_x[i] - a[i,j]*old_x[j]
End If
End For
End For
Until new_x and old_x converge to each other
The interval linear system given by the equation can be solved for x_ to obtain an outer bound on
the solution set, say N(˜x, x). The notation includes both ˜x and x to show the dependence on
both terms. It follows that 0 2 f(˜x)+J(x)(N(˜x, x)− ˜x), which suggests the following iteration, for k =
0, 1, . . . and ˜x(k) 2 x(k):
A reasonable choice for ˜x(k) is the center, denoted by ˇx, of x. In this work, we decided to use it,
however other choices are available . The linear system given by equation can be solved using
an appropriate interval method to give the Newton operator
7.2 Proposed Algorithm
In this section we briefly present the main aspects of our approach to computationally
solve the power flow problem.
(i) Data Input
The data provided by the user are classified into two types: transmission-line data
(resistance, reactance, susceptance of the circuits etc.) and bus data (magnitude and phase
of the voltage at slack bus, generated real power at PV buses etc.). In the second group
we find the load data, which are given as interval data, since they are specified
considering the probable measurement errors5.
-----------------1
Real and reactive power at any bus P is,
---------------------2
This load flow problem can be solved by the Newton’s method using a set of nonlinear
equations to express real and reactive powers in terms of bus voltages Substituting Ip
from equation(1) into equation(2) results in
--------------------------3
Using cartesian coordinates, we have Ep = ep + jfp and Ypq = Gpq + jBpq, and then
equation (3) becomes Pp − jQp = (ep − jfp)Pn ,q=1(Gpq + jBpq)(eq + jfq). Separating the
real and imaginary parts, we have
This formulation results in a set of nonlinear equations, two for each bus of the system.
Note that the real and reactive powers are given by Pp = Pgp − Pdp and Qp = Qgp−Qdp ,
respectively, where Pgp and Qgp are the generated real and reactive powers at bus p, and
Pdp and Qdp are the real and reactive power loads at bus p, respectively. At this point, it
is important to point out that the known real and reactive power loads Pdp and Qdp
present an uncertainty due the measurement errors. Pdp and Qdp belong to an interval
that is estimated at beginning of the process, since the accuracy of the instrument is
known a priori. This implies it is necessary to admit that the real and reactive powers Pgp
and Qgp , which are specified in the beginning of the process, may range in an interval
with an admissible radium determined by an heuristic method based on the experience of
a system operator. The real and imaginary components of voltage ep and fp are unknown
intervals for all buses except the slack bus, where the voltage interval is specified and
remains fixed. Thus there are 2(n − 1) equations to be solved for a load flow problem. In
Order to reach the solution; we use the interval version of the Newton’s algorithm.
7.4 Fundamental voltage collapse equation
A simple power system is considered, through which the useful index of the voltage
stability is derived. As showed in Fig.1, whereby bus 1 is assumed as a generator bus and
bus 2 is a load bus whose voltage behavior will be our interest.
This simple system can be described by the following equations (where the dot above a
letter represents a vector):
Thereby an indicator has been derived which can be used for monitoring the voltage
stability problem of the system and for assessing the degree of risk for a potential voltage
collapse. When S2 =0 , the indicator will be zero and indicates that there will be no
voltage problem. When S2 =1 , the voltage at load bus will collapse.
Chapter 8
It consists of five synchronous machines with IEEE type-1 exciters, three of which are
synchronous compensators used only for reactive power support. There are 11 loads in
the system totaling 259 MW and 73 Mvar. The dynamic data for the generators exciters
was selected from [19].
Fig 8.1: IEEE 14 bus test system
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newton Raphson Loadflow Analysis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Bus | V | Angle | Injection | Generation | Load |
| No | pu | Degree | MW | MVar | MW | Mvar | MW | MVar |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1.0600 0.0000 225.531 -13.754 225.531 -13.754 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 1.0450 -4.7936 25.000 32.591 46.700 45.291 21.700 12.700
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 1.0100 -12.5745 -94.200 8.746 -0.000 27.746 94.200 19.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 1.0132 -10.0871 -47.800 3.900 -0.000 -0.000 47.800 -3.900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 1.0166 -8.6191 -7.600 -1.600 -0.000 0.000 7.600 1.600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 1.0700 -14.3015 -11.200 15.521 0.000 23.021 11.200 7.500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 1.0457 -13.0843 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 1.0800 -13.0843 0.000 21.026 0.000 21.026 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 1.0305 -14.6688 -29.500 -16.600 0.000 0.000 29.500 16.600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 1.0299 -14.8858 -9.000 -5.800 0.000 0.000 9.000 5.800
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 1.0461 -14.7102 -3.500 -1.800 0.000 0.000 3.500 1.800
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 1.0533 -15.1514 -6.100 -1.600 0.000 0.000 6.100 1.600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 1.0466 -15.1850 -13.500 -5.800 -0.000 -0.000 13.500 5.800
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 1.0193 -15.9226 -14.900 -5.000 0.000 0.000 14.900 5.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 13.231 29.828 272.231 103.328 259.000 73.500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newton Raphson Loadflow Analysis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Bus | V | Angle | Injection | Generation | Load |
| No | pu | Degree | MW | MVar | MW | Mvar | MW | MVar |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1.0600 0.0000 260.928 -17.118 260.928 -17.118 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 1.0430 -5.3474 18.300 35.066 40.000 47.766 21.700 12.700
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 1.0217 -7.5448 -2.400 -1.200 -0.000 0.000 2.400 1.200
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 1.0129 -9.2989 -7.600 -1.600 0.000 0.000 7.600 1.600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 1.0100 -14.1542 -94.200 16.965 -0.000 35.965 94.200 19.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 1.0121 -11.0880 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 1.0035 -12.8734 -22.800 -10.900 -0.000 0.000 22.800 10.900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 1.0100 -11.8039 -30.000 0.691 0.000 30.691 30.000 30.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 1.0507 -14.1363 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 1.0438 -15.7341 -5.800 17.000 0.000 19.000 5.800 2.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 1.0820 -14.1363 0.000 16.270 0.000 16.270 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 1.0576 -14.9416 -11.200 -7.500 0.000 -0.000 11.200 7.500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 1.0710 -14.9416 -0.000 10.247 -0.000 10.247 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 1.0429 -15.8244 -6.200 -1.600 -0.000 0.000 6.200 1.600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 1.0384 -15.9101 -8.200 -2.500 -0.000 0.000 8.200 2.500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 1.0445 -15.5487 -3.500 -1.800 -0.000 -0.000 3.500 1.800
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17 1.0387 -15.8856 -9.000 -5.800 -0.000 -0.000 9.000 5.800
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 1.0282 -16.5425 -3.200 -0.900 -0.000 -0.000 3.200 0.900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 1.0252 -16.7273 -9.500 -3.400 0.000 0.000 9.500 3.400
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20 1.0291 -16.5363 -2.200 -0.700 0.000 -0.000 2.200 0.700
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 1.0293 -16.2462 -17.500 -11.200 -0.000 0.000 17.500 11.200
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 1.0353 -16.0738 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23 1.0291 -16.2528 -3.200 -1.600 -0.000 -0.000 3.200 1.600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 1.0237 -16.4409 -8.700 -2.400 -0.000 4.300 8.700 6.700
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25 1.0202 -16.0539 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26 1.0025 -16.4712 -3.500 -2.300 0.000 0.000 3.500 2.300
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 1.0265 -15.5558 0.000 -0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28 1.0109 -11.7436 0.000 -0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29 1.0067 -16.7777 -2.400 -0.900 -0.000 0.000 2.400 0.900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30 0.9953 -17.6546 -10.600 -1.900 0.000 0.000 10.600 1.900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 17.528 20.921 300.928 147.121 283.400 126.200
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Line Flow and Losses
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|From|To | P | Q | From| To | P | Q | Line Loss |
|Bus |Bus| MW | MVar | Bus | Bus| MW | MVar | MW | MVar |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 173.143 -18.108 2 1 -167.964 33.617 5.179 15.509
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 3 87.785 6.248 3 1 -84.669 5.140 3.116 11.388
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 4 43.619 5.194 4 2 -42.607 -2.113 1.011 3.081
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 4 82.269 -3.772 4 3 -81.412 6.235 0.858 2.463
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 5 82.293 4.033 5 2 -79.347 8.342 2.945 12.374
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 6 60.353 1.403 6 2 -58.406 4.503 1.946 5.906
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 6 72.272 -17.521 6 4 -71.631 19.753 0.641 2.231
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 7 -14.853 11.796 7 5 15.015 -11.387 0.162 0.409
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 7 38.195 -1.201 7 6 -37.815 2.370 0.381 1.169
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 8 29.490 -3.214 8 6 -29.387 3.574 0.103 0.361
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 9 27.799 -18.485 9 6 -27.799 20.698 0.000 2.213
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 10 15.882 -5.306 10 6 -15.882 6.781 0.000 1.475
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 11 -0.000 -15.799 11 9 0.000 16.270 0.000 0.470
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 10 27.799 7.041 10 9 -27.799 -6.222 0.000 0.819
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 12 44.147 -16.795 12 4 -44.147 21.983 0.000 5.188
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 13 0.000 -10.119 13 12 -0.000 10.247 -0.000 0.128
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 14 7.790 2.390 14 12 -7.717 -2.238 0.073 0.152
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 15 17.639 6.705 15 12 -17.429 -6.290 0.211 0.415
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 16 7.518 3.420 16 12 -7.460 -3.299 0.058 0.121
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 15 1.517 0.638 15 14 -1.511 -0.633 0.006 0.005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 17 3.960 1.499 17 16 -3.946 -1.468 0.014 0.032
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 18 6.291 1.829 18 15 -6.249 -1.742 0.043 0.087
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 19 3.049 0.842 19 18 -3.043 -0.830 0.006 0.012
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 20 -6.457 -2.570 20 19 6.473 2.601 0.016 0.031
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 20 8.749 3.471 20 10 -8.673 -3.301 0.076 0.170
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 17 5.067 4.367 17 10 -5.054 -4.332 0.013 0.035
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 21 18.286 11.764 21 10 -18.135 -11.439 0.151 0.325
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 22 5.780 3.107 22 10 -5.751 -3.048 0.029 0.059
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 23 0.635 0.239 23 21 -0.635 -0.239 0.000 0.000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 23 4.449 2.593 23 15 -4.424 -2.544 0.025 0.050
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 24 5.751 3.048 24 22 -5.706 -2.977 0.045 0.071
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23 24 1.859 1.183 24 23 -1.853 -1.171 0.006 0.012
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 25 -1.142 1.748 25 24 1.149 -1.734 0.008 0.014
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25 26 3.544 2.366 26 25 -3.500 -2.300 0.044 0.066
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25 27 -4.694 -0.632 27 25 4.717 0.677 0.024 0.045
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28 27 17.998 -3.529 27 28 -17.998 4.791 -0.000 1.262
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 29 6.189 1.667 29 27 -6.103 -1.505 0.086 0.162
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 30 7.091 1.661 30 27 -6.930 -1.358 0.161 0.303
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29 30 3.703 0.605 30 29 -3.670 -0.542 0.033 0.063
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 28 -0.613 -0.241 28 8 0.614 0.242 0.000 0.001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 28 18.670 -3.094 28 6 -18.611 3.304 0.059 0.209
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Loss 17.528 68.888
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the above data analysis we observe that every bus has its own load capability.
When we increase the individual load of every bus by 0.1 MW then some bus shows real
collapse phenomena. Only 3 buses showed some voltage decrease picture which we can
observe by below data’s:
Load increase 0.1 MW
Bus no Initial voltage Present voltage
1 1.060 3.1780
2 1.045 3.0887
3 1.010 0.9860
4 1.0132 2.9036
5 1.016 0.9987
6 1.07 3.2383
7 1.0457 3.0929
8 1.08 1.011
9 1.035 3.0299
10 1.0299 3.001
11 1.0461 3.0982
12 1.0533 3.1380
13 1.0466 3.0982
14 1.0193 2.9837
Load increase 0.2 MW
Bus no Initial voltage Present voltage
1 1.060 3.2656
2 1.045 3.1650
3 1.010 0.9689
4 1.0132 2.9753
5 1.016 0.9949
6 1.07 3.3182
7 1.0457 3.1692
8 1.08 1.0197
9 1.035 3.1047
10 1.0299 3.0742
11 1.0461 3.1717
12 1.0533 3.2155
13 1.0466 3.1747
14 1.0193 3.0112
As seen from the load variation and the voltage value we have some ratio aspects. Bus
no3, Bus no 5 , Bus no 8 shows decrease value voltage. If we plot the load versus voltage
curve then we can find that the voltage decrease with the superlative increase of the load.
Assign all those load value and voltage we got,
Bus no 8--------------------------
Bus no 5--------------------------; Bus no 3--------------------------
|V2|
LOAD---------------------
From the data which we analysis within the reactive power imbalance chart, we find that
one single bus is going to collapse very fast. It may call dynamic voltage collapse. Other
buses act well with this unbalancing reactive power value. If we plot that curve then we
can clearly depict how voltage can decrease with moderate reactive power shortage
Power capacitor is basically an electrical device used for improving power factor of the
electrical power system when the load is inductive. Most of the industries use induction
motors, which results Low power factor in the neighboring distribution line. This causes
big KVAR loss and wastage of energy. Therefore, Improvement of power factor is
considered to be one of the important measures of energy conservation. Use of power
capacitors improves the power factor of the line to which they are connected and thereby
improving power factor for neighboring industry also. In certain applications, capacitors
are used to store energy also, but with limited use [21]
Almost all the Electricity authorities have now made compulsory to install L.T. Power
Capacitors in the case of all industrial loads. This implies for every induction motor, LT
power capacitor is a must. Due to massive rural electrification and use of electric pumps
in irrigation and industrial purposes the motor load is increasing day by day. Hence,
demand for power capacitors is increasing.
The watt loss or alternatively the power dissipated by a power capacitor is an important
parameter among many other parameters of a power capacitor. Right in the purchasing
stage, power capacitors of different makes are evaluated based upon the guaranteed
power loss claimed by the manufacturers. The reasons for attaching importance to the
power dissipated by the power capacitors can be classified as follows.[23]
1) Higher power loss means higher running costs hence longer payback period.
2) Higher power loss means increased temperature of power capacitor, which
reduces the operating life of capacitors.
3) Higher power loss means poor quality raw materials used and/or improper
manufacturing process employed.
Ideally a power capacitor is desired to have zero power loss. This ideal condition can be
achieved only if one uses zero resistance interconnecting leads and dielectric materials
like paper, oil etc with ideal characteristics. Practically, the materials used in manufacture
of power capacitors have non-ideal characteristics, like finite resistance of inter
connecting leads and non-ideal electrical characteristics of insulating materials. This
places a limit to which the power loss of power capacitors can be minimized. The most
important factor determining the power loss is the quality of manufacturing process, such
as prevention of ingress of moisture and other contaminations and proper formation of
electrodes by metal spraying.
The power loss experienced by power capacitors can be broadly classified, as arising due
to the following:
1) Power loss due to the introduction of discharge resistors.
2) Power loss due to resistance of inter- connecting wires.
3) Power loss due to internal fuses if employed.
4) Power loss due to dielectric properties of insulating material polypropylenes
factor (cos ϕ) in the network. Inductive loads consume reactive power, e.g.
magnetization power for transformers, motors and reactors. The reactive power needed is
generated by capacitors. By applying capacitors adjacent to equipment consuming
reactive power, several advantages are obtained:
Filter Capacitors
Many of the loads in a power network such as converters, rectifiers, welding equipment
and arc furnaces generate harmonics. Increased losses and damage to electronic
equipment are among the problems that may occur. Harmonic filters eliminate the
problem by reducing the harmonic content in the network and also improve the power
factor by generating reactive power
Modern electrical equipment generates harmonic currents which are transmitted to the
supply network. Most of the harmonics arise from electronically controlled equipment
such as converters, variable speed drives, static con-verters, welding equipment etc. but
also from arc furnaces. Among the problems that may occur due to excessive harmonic
currents are:
- Increased losses in motors, transformers and cables which may lead to overheating
- Overloading of capacitors
- Damage to or malfunction in electronic equipment
- Malfunction of receiver relays in ripple control system
- Interference with telephone circuits.
The most common method of solving this problem is to install harmonic filters. The filter
components are capacitors, reactors and sometimes resistors, of which the most important
part is the capacitor since it generates the reactive power.
Series Capacitors
Series capacitors in transmission systems increase power transfer capability and reduce
losses. Series capacitors are also installed in distribution systems, mainly to improve the
voltage stability.
Series capacitors are installed in transmission systems mainly in order to increase the
power transfer capability and to reduce losses by optimizing load distribution between
parallel transmission lines. Series capacitors are also installed in distribution systems.
Here, the main reason is to improve the voltage stability of the network.
Series compensation of a network positively affects the voltage and the reactive power
balance. When the load current passes through the capacitor, the voltage drop over the
capacitor varies in proportion to the current. The voltage drop is capacitive, i.e. it
compensates the inductive voltage drop, which also varies with the load current. The
result is an automatic stabilizing effect on the voltage in a network. Simultaneously,
series capacitors generate reactive power, the power factor in the network is improved,
whereby the line current and the line losses are reduced and the load capacity is
increased. The generated reactive power varies proportionally to the square of the load
current thus the reactive power is automatically regulated.
SVC Capacitors
In static var compensation (SVC) thyristors are used for switching and control of
capacitors and reactors. Ever since the first installation in 1972, ABB Capacitors has been
the supplier of capacitor banks for ABB´s static var compen-sation.
In static var compensation, (SVC) thyristors are used for switching and control of
capacitors and reactors. Instant transient-free switching is obtained, as well as
continuously variable control of the reactive power.
HVDC Capacitors
Power capacitors form an important part of an HVDC transmission system for harmonic
filtering as well as supply of reactive power. Capacitors with high quality and reliability
are essential to the overall performance of the system.
Power capacitors form an important part of an HVDC transmission system for filtering of
harmonic and supply of reactive power. Their high quality and reliability are essential to
the overall performance of the system. ABB therefore, uses self-protected capacitors in
HVDC applications. The self-protected capacitors can be either of a patented fuseless
design or equipped with internal fuses. The self-protected design offers advantages of
vital importance for all applications where high reliability is an absolute necessity, such
as in HVDC systems.
Single element failures do not affect the performance and protection coordination is
easier, enabling increased selectivity compared to other protection solutions. High quality
and reliability not only improve the electrical performance of the capacitors, also the
ability to resist severe climatic and seismic conditions is enhanced.
Fig9.3: HVDC Capacitors
TSC
A thyristor switched capacitor (TSC) is a capacitor connected in series with two opposite
poled thyristors so that one thyristors conducts in each positive half cycle of the supply
frequency, while the other conducts in the corresponding negative half cycle. The current
flowing through the capacitor may be controlled by blocking the thyristors. To achieve
controlled reactive power a TSC is always configured in groups (ABB 1999a).
One disadvantage in utilising a TSC is the switching transients produced. Since a TSC
blocks current when the thyristors are blocked and allows current to flow when the
thyristors are gated, severe transients will occur if a TSC is switched off while the current
through it is not zero (Tyll 2004, p. 9). Similarly, to avoid generation of transients during
switch on, the thyristor must receive its firing pulse at a particular instant of the voltage
cycle. That is, transient free switching may be obtained when the voltage across a
capacitor is either at its positive peak or negative peak such that the current through the
capacitor is zero.
9.3 Introduction to SVC
A Static Var Compensator (SVC) consists of thyristor controlled reactive plant, either
capacitor banks, reactors or both, in combination with fixed reactive plant. This variable
static equipment provides continuously variable reactive power injection or absorption to
the network, facilitating dynamic Var balancing and so improves the efficiency,
controllability and quality of power systems. SVCs are commonly connected at
transmission substations via star-delta vector group step down transformers, and consist
of shunt connected inductors or capacitors, or more commonly a combination of the two,
where at least one is variable (ABB 1999a). Variable inductors take the form of thyristor
controlled reactors. Within an SVC, capacitors usually take the form of fixed or
mechanically switched banks which may also be subdivided into harmonic filtering
circuits tuned to the dominant frequencies. Thyristor switched capacitors are used when
fast or varied frequency capacitor switching is required (Janke 2002, p. 4). The main
purpose of an SVC is to regulate and control substation bus voltage to the desired level,
providing fast control of steady state and dynamic voltages and improving system
stability by reactive power control of dynamic loads (Janke 2002, p. 7). This will result in
increased power transfer capacity as SVCs present a variable impedance of controllable
power angle (ABB 1999b) and maintain a stable voltage profile along the transmission
line.
There are two main SVC types in common use, and are defined by the manner in which
the reactive power is utilised for compensation. SVCs are primarily used for
compensation of transmission lines and for balancing of single-phase railway loads, that
is, voltage imbalance. Static Var Compensators for transmission applications are required
to:
• Regulate and control voltage at the point of connection;
• Enhance damping of system electro-mechanical oscillations, and;
• Provide fast reactive Var support following system contingencies.
Static Var Compensators for load balancing applications are required to:
• Convert single phase load into balanced three phase load;
• Reduce negative sequence components in system voltage, and;
• Regulate positive sequence components in system voltage.
SVCs utilized for transmission applications generally have symmetrical phase control and
the same swing range in all three phases. Compensators for load balancing are single
phase controlled and may have different swing ranges in different phase groups (ABB
1999b).
Fig 9.4: Single line diagram of a typical SVC
The primary purpose of an SVC control system is to produce firing signals to thyristor
valves to phase angle control the reactor in such a manner that a continuous controllable
output of reactive power is obtained on a cycle by cycle basis produces the desired effect
on the transmission system (Janke 2002, p.5). When the thyristors in the thyristor valve
are fully conducting, the reactor consumes more than the reactive power generated in the
fixed capacitor bank and the net output from the compensator is inductive. When the
thyristors are blocked, there is no current in the reactor and the output from the
compensator will be all the reactive power generated in the capacitor bank. To fulfill its
primary purpose, a SVC control system may utilise input signals such as voltage,
summated current and synchronizing signals. Output signals would include the firing
signals to the thyristor valves. A simplified view of SVC control system function is
illustrated in Figure 9.5
Fig 9.5: SVC control system structure
SVC control systems may have both a manual and an automatic operating mode. Manual
operating modes are often referred to as BREF control and the automatic mode as VREF
control. In BREF control mode, the SVC operates as if it were static reactive plant
providing fixed susceptance to the power system.
When selected to VREF control mode, the SVC attempts to maintain target voltage and
the SVC susceptance output will vary according to the system voltage. If the measured
power system voltage was greater than the target, the control system response is such as
to create an inductive reactance to decrease system voltage. For measured power system
voltages less than the target value, control system response is intended to present a
capacitive reactance to the power system and thus raise voltage levels
1.2
1
volatge-v,V
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
load-P,kw
From the figure 9.7 we can observe that at normal condition when bus is going to
collapse , if we use SVC on the bus at that time it can prevent collapse with very fast
recovery of reactive power. In that analysis we use a 10 MVar value SVC for IEEE 14
bus test system. We also use the SVC for all 3 collapse bus. Rest of the bus simulation
figure is given below:
1.2
1
volatge-v,V
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
load-P,kw
From fig 9.8 it is clearly shown that bus 5 collapse problem can be eliminated with the
use of the SVC.
collapse mitigation using capacitor bank in bus 3
1.4
1.2
1
volatge-v,V
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
load-P,kw
0.9
0.8
0.7
voltage,V
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
-0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
reactive power-Q,VAR
VAR regulator
The Var limiter acts to limit the Var loading of a generator if the output reaches its
threshold. Otherwise, the regulator is free to adjust excitation as necessary to control
voltage without regard to Var swings. The Var regulator is different from the limiter. This
control feature, rather than controlling the voltage to a set point, controls the Var output
of the machine to a set point. Var regulation is wellsuited to a system that has a steady,
baseload need for Var support. Both of these devices have application with smaller
machines ("small" relative to the connected system) because of their inability to
significantly alter the transmission bus voltage, regardless of their Var loading. However,
it should be recognized that when these limiters are in operation, the generator will not
act to help support system voltage during emergencies.
Switched capacitance
Manual switching, or conventional voltage control devices are often adequate for
switching capacitors in the longer time frame. Capacitors are considered to be static
reactive power sources when applied for long term voltage control. Static capacitors may
be switched seasonally, weekly, or daily for this type of application, where the switching
devices may be circuit breakers or circuit switchers. The design of the capacitor
installation must consider the possible speed and frequency of switching, as well as the
voltage support requirements. Very frequent switching would put a significant amount of
wear on the switching device. When the time frame of the voltage stability phenomena
approaches the transient region, automatic switching is almost always required.
Capacitors are often switched by voltage relays with time delays. To achieve the higher
switching speed, additional controls may be required to prevent excessive switching and
wear on the switching device. The voltage relays used for switching may not be the
conventional voltage control relays. They may need higher accuracy, or different
techniques, similar to those used for undervoltage load shedding. For instance, the
requirement for switching may need the three phase voltages to be inside a certain
window, or the requirement may be controlled by the status of other dynamic reactive
power sources such as nearby synchronous condensers, or static Var compensators. BC
Hydro uses a PLC to coordinate the measurement of the output of synchronous
condensers (rated 2x100 Mvar and 2x50 Mvar) and the switching of 2x50 Mvar capacitor
banks. Figure IV-1 shows the simplified logic diagram of the PLC used to control the
capacitors. The capacitor banks are switched if the total output exceeds 60% of the rating
of units in service with automatic voltage regulators. The PLC is used to calculate the
output from all units. If the output is high, and system voltage is not too high, one
capacitor bank will be switched on. If the output is very high, and the voltage is not too
high, both capacitors will be switched on. The same device automatically switches the
capacitors off if the output of the synchronous condensers goes low, and if the system
voltage is not also low. By this means, the utility can control the system such that the
synchronous condenser is available for dynamic supply of reactive power by keeping the
condenser output low under normal steady state conditions. This is an example of using
relatively slow speed switching of a capacitor to increase reactive reserve earlier than
required for an emergency situation. Early switching of static sources means more
dynamic power is available for quick support during emergencies. To minimize wear and
tear on the switching equipment, the automatic control is sometimes unidirectional. The
reactive equipment is automatically switched on or off, to quickly regulate the voltage
excursion, and operator control is used to restore normal conditions when the disturbance
is over. This is a major difference between special schemes and normal voltage control
devices which switch reactive equipment after very long time delays.
Automatic reclosing
Fast reclosure of high voltage transmission is used as the first attempt to restore lost
transmission as quickly as possible to minimize exposure to excessive and unacceptable
voltage declines and to enhance the stability of the system. Ontario Hydro has
implemented a scheme using faster than normal automatic reclosure to prevent voltage
collapse in the event of a transmission line outage coincident with outages on other parts
of the transmission system. The reclosure attempt must occur within 1.5 seconds after the
initial loss of the transmission line. This time frame is dictated by the effectiveness of
subsequent load shedding should the reclosure not be successful. A reclosure time of
1.175 seconds can be achieved with the slowest breakers in the region (closing time 0.225
s). The total reclosure time includes 0.5 s dead time before reclosing the energizing
breaker (lead terminal) and 0.1 s delay for closing the follow terminal on restoration of
potential from the lead terminal. If reclosure is unsuccessful, and the load is high, load
shedding is required to ensure an acceptable voltage profile. Load shedding must be
initiated as soon as possible after unsuccessful reclose attempt if the voltage is lower than
85% of normal levels. A total of 504 MW distributed at nine different stations is available
for shedding. Each block of load can be armed by operator action and will be tripped
when the local station voltage drops below a preset value for a preset time period. The
scheme is based on monitoring the transmission voltage with undervoltage relays on
either side of the main or backup potential sources (automatic transfer for loss of the
main source). The undervoltage relays are duplicated, and both relays, set to 85% of the
normal operating voltage, must operate to shed load. The load is shed if the undervoltage
condition persists for more than 1.5 seconds. Load shedding is blocked if both the main
and alternate sources are lost (as detected by another undervoltage relay). A total of 36
capacitor banks (both transmission and distribution banks) in 17 transformer stations in
the region are equipped with automatic switching features that are voltage and time
dependent. The capacitors maintain the voltage levels at or above the minimum
acceptable level of about 90% of nominal. A predetermined sequence of capacitor
switching can occur up to 8 seconds after the initial loss of transmission. The effect of
capacitor switching following load shedding is that of fine tuning the voltage levels to
within the normal band.
Active dynamic buffers are a method for mitigating the effects of constant-power loads in
Weak power systems. These devices act as an interface that decouples the dynamics of
the load from the system. Even though power buffers and uninterruptible power supplies
(UPS) are seemingly similar, and both deal with power quality, the two classifications of
devices have very different objectives. While a UPS supplies power to an end load during
an outage, little to no consideration is given to the state of the power system. In contrast,
a power buffer’s objective is to offer beneficial dynamic characteristics that help stabilize
a marginal system, while still supplying the end load with power. Because of its concern
only for the load and not the system, a UPS typically contains a much larger energy
storage device than a buffer, and consequently can supply the load for a longer period.
An interpretation of buffer operation during a dynamic event is seen in Figure. During a
transient, the buffer exhibits desirable dynamic characteristics, such as constant current or
constant impedance while supplying the load with constant power. The selection of the
dynamic characteristics of the buffer is dependent on the nature of the power system and
the likely faults that are to be buffered.
A power buffer presents dynamically controlled impedance at its input, and supplies an
independent load at its output. This broad definition can manifest as a wide range of
physical topologies, depending on the nature of the system and the desired response. The
circuit in Figure 22 is an example of a three-phase, six-pulse active rectifier that can be
used as a dynamic buffer. With this buffer topology, the six-pulse silicon controlled
rectifier (SCR) bridge operates at a nominal phase angle during normal operation. When
a fault occurs, the buffer senses the voltage sag and then controls the phase angle of the
rectifier to decrease Vrec and draw less power from the system, while energy from dc-link
capacitor C is used to supply the load. When the fault clears, the control slowly raises Vrec
back to its nominal value, recharging C. Another example of a dynamic power buffer
topology is depicted in Figure 9.13. This circuit operates in a fashion similar to Figure
9.12, with the exception that the power from each phase can be controlled independently.
In the case of a severe single-phase fault, this circuit can limit power draw from the
faulted phase while extracting additional power from the other two phases until the fault
clears. Depending on the line impedance of the no faulted phases, the buffer may not
need to enter an impedance control scheme at all. However, an obvious disadvantage of
this topology is the added complexity.
Super var
Super VAR is a synchronous condenser that employs HTS superconductor field winding
This allows it to be much more efficient, compact and reliable. As compared to
conventional rotating machine.
Conclusion
The power system can be divided into three sub-systems: The generating part, the
transmission part and, the distribution part with the load demand. Voltage stability
problems can arise in any of these sub-systems and can be studied separately or in
combination. In this dissertation, the following aspects have been studied:
The generation part
Field and armarture current limiters have a major impact on the generator capability. The
transition between different control modes of the generator seems to be non-reversible
from a system point of view if no radical control actions are taken.
The distribution part including the load demand
Load characteristics of asynchronous motors and dynamic load recovery due to electrical
heating appliances may set the voltage stability limit for the system. The load
characteristics are very important for the system behaviour. One significant boundary of
this characteristic is a load behaving as a constant current load. For loads responding as
an impedance, a voltage drop will unload the system whereas the opposite is valid for a
constant power load. Note the strong coupling between dynamic loads and OLTCs. If the
time constants are in the same order, an overshoot in power demand can arise.
Interaction between the generation and the transmission system
In case of field current limitation, the generator “synchronous reactance” is included into
the transmission system. This alone can cause a collapse, force load voltages to a low
value due to the increased reactance of the system. The field current limiter may force the
working. point to the lower side of the U-P-curve which is an unstable operating point for
certain loads.
Interaction between the generation and the distribution system
The armarture current limiter causes the generator to be very sensitive to the voltage
characteristics of the load. If the load increases its current demand for a decreasing
voltage, a severe voltage stability problem occurs. The on-load tap changer may also play
an important role causing high currents in the generator.
Interaction between the transmission system and the distribution system
Transformers with on-load tap changers are usually located between the transmission
system and the distribution system. The system response of a tap changing step is not
obvious and depends on the load behaviors and the strength of the transmission system. A
whole range of different responses is possible when OLTCs and loads interact.
From the mitigation analaysis and statistical results and better acting properties of
collapse technique with the load flow analysis I do believe that , we have to do below
steps for collapse mitigation:
Anticipate the problem by using load flow and stability studies to identify system
conditions that may lead to voltage instability. Conditions that lead to voltage collapse
may be caused or aggravated by heavy power transfer between regions; so coordination
among the affected regions is essential to develop the appropriate mitigative action.
Results of these studies can be used to develop special operating procedures to minimize
the probability of collapse. Where studies show that operating procedures alone are not
sufficient to ensure voltage stability, special control and protection schemes can be
applied to mitigate the conditions leading to collapse.
Use appropriate diagnostic techniques to provide early warning of the onset of voltage
Stability problems. Since voltage collapse is a wide area problem, these techniques often
need communications assistance. The communications are not necessarily high speed, but
must be reliable. The techniques involve measurement of relevant factors such as voltage
magnitude, status and output of sources of reactive power, rate of change of reactive
power generation with respect to load, and magnitudes of real and reactive power flows.
Provide temporary reactive support until operator action can stabilize system. This may
require taking advantage of temporary overload capabilities of generators and
synchronous condensers in the affected area. To ensure full capability of all sources are
available, they should be operated from time to time at maximum and minimum reactive
outputs to ensure all protective devices coordinate properly with control devices.
Provide permanent reactive support. Since it is deficiency of reactive power sources that
causes voltage to drop, provision of these sources are an effective means of maintaining
voltages. Switched capacitors are a popular means of providing such support, but care
must be taken to avoid depending entirely on fixed support such as is provided by
capacitors. Fixed sources do not provide the control of system voltage which is critical in
near collapse situations.
Provide temporary load relief by blocking tap changers or reducing distribution supply
voltage. The amount of load relief provided by these means is determined entirely by the
static and dynamic characteristics of the real and reactive components of the load with
respect to voltage level. These characteristics vary widely, and may need to be
determined by test. The reduction in reactive power demand with voltage is often larger
than the reduction in real power demand. It must be ensured that voltage quality is not
degraded so much that the alternative of load shedding would not have been preferable to
the customer.
Chapter 11
Future Work
There is an international tendency to increase the power transfer limits in the networks
and to improve the efficiency of existing power plants. The reasons are on the one hand
the huge economical costs for new investments and the growing environmental concern
and on the other hand the considerable economic benefits to be gained. This will raise the
requirements for more sophisticated computer programs and model and there will be
ongoing efforts to maintain and to improve the reliability in the power systems. Therefore
the need to improve planning and operation in power systems, underlines the importance
of future work in the voltage stability field.
% Type....
% 1 - Slack Bus..
% 2 - PV Bus..
% 3 - PQ Bus..
% |Bus | Type | Vsp | theta | PGi | QGi | PLi | QLi | Qmin | Qmax |
busdat14 = [1 1 1.060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
2 2 1.045 0 40 42.4 21.7 12.7 -40 50;
3 2 1.010 0 0 23.4 94.2 19.0 0 40;
4 3 1.0 0 0 0 47.8 -3.9 0 0;
5 3 1.0 0 0 0 7.6 1.6 0 0;
6 2 1.070 0 0 12.2 11.2 7.5 -6 24;
7 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
8 2 1.090 0 0 17.4 0.0 0.0 -6 24;
9 3 1.0 0 0 0 29.5 16.6 0 0;
10 3 1.0 0 0 0 9.0 5.8 0 0;
11 3 1.0 0 0 0 3.5 1.8 0 0;
12 3 1.0 0 0 0 6.1 1.6 0 0;
13 3 1.0 0 0 0 13.5 5.8 0 0;
14 3 1.0 0 0 0 14.9 5.0 0 0;];
% |Bus | Type | Vsp | theta | PGi | QGi | PLi | QLi | Qmin | Qmax |
busdat30 = [1 1 1.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
2 2 1.043 0 40 50.0 21.7 12.7 -40 50;
3 3 1.0 0 0 0 2.4 1.2 0 0;
4 3 1.06 0 0 0 7.6 1.6 0 0;
5 2 1.01 0 0 37.0 94.2 19.0 -40 40;
6 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
7 3 1.0 0 0 0 22.8 10.9 0 0;
8 2 1.01 0 0 37.3 30.0 30.0 -10 40;
9 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
10 3 1.0 0 0 19.0 5.8 2.0 0 0;
11 2 1.082 0 0 16.2 0.0 0.0 -6 24;
12 3 1.0 0 0 0 11.2 7.5 0 0;
13 2 1.071 0 0 10.6 0.0 0.0 -6 24;
14 3 1.0 0 0 0 6.2 1.6 0 0;
15 3 1.0 0 0 0 8.2 2.5 0 0;
16 3 1.0 0 0 0 3.5 1.8 0 0;
17 3 1.0 0 0 0 9.0 5.8 0 0;
18 3 1.0 0 0 0 3.2 0.9 0 0;
19 3 1.0 0 0 0 9.5 3.4 0 0;
20 3 1.0 0 0 0 2.2 0.7 0 0;
21 3 1.0 0 0 0 17.5 11.2 0 0;
22 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
23 3 1.0 0 0 0 3.2 1.6 0 0;
24 3 1.0 0 0 4.3 8.7 6.7 0 0;
25 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
26 3 1.0 0 0 0 3.5 2.3 0 0;
27 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
28 3 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0;
29 3 1.0 0 0 0 2.4 0.9 0 0;
30 3 1.0 0 0 0 10.6 1.9 0 0 ];
% |Bus | Type | Vsp | theta | PGi | QGi | PLi | QLi | Qmin | Qmax |
busdat57 = [1 1 1.040 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
2 2 1.010 0 3.0 88.0 0.0 -0.8 50.0 -17.0;
3 2 0.985 0 41.0 21.0 40.0 -1.0 60.0 -10.0;
4 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
5 3 1.000 0 13.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
6 2 0.980 0 75.0 2.0 0.0 0.8 25.0 -8.0;
7 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
8 2 1.005 0 150.0 22.0 450.0 62.1 200.0 -140.0;
9 2 0.980 0 121.0 26.0 0.0 2.2 9.0 -3.0;
10 3 1.000 0 5.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
11 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
12 2 1.015 0 377.0 24.0 310.0 128.5 155.0 -150.0;
13 3 1.000 0 18.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
14 3 1.000 0 10.5 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
15 3 1.000 0 22.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
16 3 1.000 0 43.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
17 3 1.000 0 42.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
18 3 1.000 0 27.2 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
19 3 1.000 0 3.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
20 3 1.000 0 2.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
21 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
22 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
23 3 1.000 0 6.3 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
24 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
25 3 1.000 0 6.3 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
26 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
27 3 1.000 0 9.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
28 3 1.000 0 4.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
29 3 1.000 0 17.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
30 3 1.000 0 3.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
31 3 1.000 0 5.8 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
32 3 1.000 0 1.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
33 3 1.000 0 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
34 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
35 3 1.000 0 6.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
36 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
37 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
38 3 1.000 0 14.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
39 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
40 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
41 3 1.000 0 6.3 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
42 3 1.000 0 7.1 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
43 3 1.000 0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
44 3 1.000 0 12.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
45 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
46 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
47 3 1.000 0 29.7 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
48 3 1.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
49 3 1.000 0 18.0 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
50 3 1.000 0 21.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
51 3 1.000 0 18.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
52 3 1.000 0 4.9 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
53 3 1.000 0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
54 3 1.000 0 4.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
55 3 1.000 0 6.8 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
56 3 1.000 0 7.6 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0;
57 3 1.000 0 6.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0];
switch num
case 14
busdt = busdat14;
case 30
busdt = busdat30;
case 57
busdt = busdat57;
end
% Program for Bus Power Injections, Line & Power flows (p.u)...
Iij = zeros(nb,nb);
Sij = zeros(nb,nb);
Si = zeros(nb,1);
% Line Losses..
Lij = zeros(nl,1);
for m = 1:nl
p = fb(m); q = tb(m);
Lij(m) = Sij(p,q) + Sij(q,p);
end
Lpij = real(Lij);
Lqij = imag(Lij);
disp('################################################################
#########################');
disp('-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
disp(' Newton Raphson Loadflow Analysis ');
disp('-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
disp('| Bus | V | Angle | Injection | Generation | Load |');
disp('| No | pu | Degree | MW | MVar | MW | Mvar | MW | MVar |
');
for m = 1:nb
disp('-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
fprintf('%3g', m); fprintf(' %8.4f', V(m)); fprintf(' %8.4f', Del(m));
fprintf(' %8.3f', Pi(m)); fprintf(' %8.3f', Qi(m));
fprintf(' %8.3f', Pg(m)); fprintf(' %8.3f', Qg(m));
fprintf(' %8.3f', Pl(m)); fprintf(' %8.3f', Ql(m)); fprintf('\n');
end
disp('-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
fprintf(' Total ');fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Pi)); fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Qi));
fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Pi+Pl)); fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Qi+Ql));
fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Pl)); fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Ql)); fprintf('\n');
disp('-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
disp('################################################################
#########################');
disp('-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
disp(' Line FLow and Losses ');
disp('-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
disp('|From|To | P | Q | From| To | P | Q | Line Loss |');
disp('|Bus |Bus| MW | MVar | Bus | Bus| MW | MVar | MW | MVar
|');
for m = 1:nl
p = fb(m); q = tb(m);
disp('-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
fprintf('%4g', p); fprintf('%4g', q); fprintf(' %8.3f', Pij(p,q)); fprintf(' %8.3f',
Qij(p,q));
fprintf(' %4g', q); fprintf('%4g', p); fprintf(' %8.3f', Pij(q,p)); fprintf(' %8.3f',
Qij(q,p));
fprintf(' %8.3f', Lpij(m)); fprintf(' %8.3f', Lqij(m));
fprintf('\n');
end
disp('-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
fprintf(' Total Loss ');
fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Lpij)); fprintf(' %8.3f', sum(Lqij)); fprintf('\n');
disp('-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------');
disp('################################################################
#####################');
% Program for Newton-Raphson Load Flow Analysis..
Tol = 1;
Iter = 1;
while (Tol > 1e-5) % Iteration starting..
P = zeros(nbus,1);
Q = zeros(nbus,1);
% Calculate P and Q
for i = 1:nbus
for k = 1:nbus
P(i) = P(i) + V(i)* V(k)*(G(i,k)*cos(del(i)-del(k)) + B(i,k)*sin(del(i)-del(k)));
Q(i) = Q(i) + V(i)* V(k)*(G(i,k)*sin(del(i)-del(k)) - B(i,k)*cos(del(i)-del(k)));
end
end
% Jacobian
% J1 - Derivative of Real Power Injections with Angles..
J1 = zeros(nbus-1,nbus-1);
for i = 1:(nbus-1)
m = i+1;
for k = 1:(nbus-1)
n = k+1;
if n == m
for n = 1:nbus
J1(i,k) = J1(i,k) + V(m)* V(n)*(-G(m,n)*sin(del(m)-del(n)) +
B(m,n)*cos(del(m)-del(n)));
end
J1(i,k) = J1(i,k) - V(m)^2*B(m,m);
else
J1(i,k) = V(m)* V(n)*(G(m,n)*sin(del(m)-del(n)) - B(m,n)*cos(del(m)-
del(n)));
end
end
end
Iter = Iter + 1;
Tol = max(abs(M)); % Tolerance..
end
loadflow(nbus,V,del,BMva); % Calling Loadflow.m..
% pf = 0.97 lagging
beta=0.25
pdn=[0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.78];
v2n=sqrt((1-beta.*pdn - sqrt(1-pdn.*(pdn+2*beta)))/2);
pdp=[0.78 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0];
v2p=sqrt((1-beta.*pdp + sqrt(1-pdp.*(pdp+2*beta)))/2);
pd1=[pdn pdp];
v21=[v2n v2p];
% pf = 1.0
beta=0
pdn=[0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.99];
v2n=sqrt((1-beta.*pdn - sqrt(1-pdn.*(pdn+2*beta)))/2);
pdp=[0.99 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0];
v2p=sqrt((1-beta.*pdp + sqrt(1-pdp.*(pdp+2*beta)))/2);
pd2=[pdn pdp];
v22=[v2n v2p];
% pf = .97 leading
beta=-0.25
pdn=[0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3];
v2n=sqrt((1-beta.*pdn - sqrt(1-pdn.*(pdn+2*beta)))/2);
pdp=[1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0];
v2p=sqrt((1-beta.*pdp + sqrt(1-pdp.*(pdp+2*beta)))/2);
pd3=[pdn pdp];
v23=[v2n v2p];
plot(pd1,v21,pd2,v22,pd3,v23)
v1=1.0;
b=1.0;
pd1=0.1
v2=[1.1,1.05,1.0,.95,.90,.85,.80,.75,.70,.65,.60,.55,.50,.45,.40,.35,.30,.25,.20,.15];
sintheta=pd1./(b*v1.*v2);
theta=asin(sintheta);
qd1=-v2.^2/b+v1*b*v2.*cos(theta);
plot(qd1,v2);