Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Comparitive Study On Mobile Based Landmark Recognition Techniques

    Caricato da

    santhipriyasunkara
    6 visualizzazioni11 pagine
    This document compares techniques for mobile-based landmark recognition, noting that it must account for both visual content analysis and location context due to mobile devices' limitations of processing power, storage, and real-time requirements. It analyzes content-based approaches like key points, dense sampling and segmentation, finds that local features like SIFT perform better than global features, and concludes that an enhanced bag-of-words method shows the most promise with the best recognition rate and fast processing speed.

    Descrizione originale:

    sem presentation

    Titolo originale

    Sem

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formati disponibili

    PPT, PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    This document compares techniques for mobile-based landmark recognition, noting that it must account for both visual content analysis and location context due to mobile devices' limitations of processing power, storage, and real-time requirements. It analyzes content-based approaches like key points, dense sampling and segmentation, finds that local features like SIFT perform better than global features, and concludes that an enhanced bag-of-words method shows the most promise with the best recognition rate and fast processing speed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato PPT, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    6 visualizzazioni11 pagine

    Comparitive Study On Mobile Based Landmark Recognition Techniques

    Caricato da

    santhipriyasunkara
    This document compares techniques for mobile-based landmark recognition, noting that it must account for both visual content analysis and location context due to mobile devices' limitations of processing power, storage, and real-time requirements. It analyzes content-based approaches like key points, dense sampling and segmentation, finds that local features like SIFT perform better than global features, and concludes that an enhanced bag-of-words method shows the most promise with the best recognition rate and fast processing speed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato PPT, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 11

    COMPARITIVE STUDY ON MOBILE BASED LANDMARK RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES

    S SANTHI PRIYA

    Non mobile-based landmark recognition is usually considered a content-based system.


    visual features

    mobile based landmark recognition should be considered an integrated content- and context based system.
    Location

    The design of a mobile landmark recognition system must take into account the following inherent challenges and limitations of mobile devices: Low processing power. Limited storage capacity. Real-time requirements.

    CONTENT ANALYSIS
    Key point based approach Dense sampling approach Segmentation based approach

    Context analysis

    Conclusion Local features work better than global features. This observation is supported by statistical hypothesis testing. SIFT has superior performance when compared to many other local descriptors. The dense-patch approach offers better performance than the sparse keypoint-based and segmentation based techniques. The enhanced BoW method is the most promising method, with the best recognition rate and fast processing speed.

    Potrebbero piacerti anche