ITWP103/ITWA133 WEB PROGRAMMING

Term Project Presentation Rating Sheet

Project Title: Presenters:

1. 4. 2. 5. 3. 6. Individual Presentation: (50 points 25%) 5 points each

1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The presenter was reasonably well groomed. The presenter was knowledgeable of their topic. The presenter used the right amount of visual aid. The presenters voice is well modulated. The presenter maintained proper posture The presenters behavior and attitude were appropriate to the occasion. The presenter answered questions directly and avoided vagueness. The presenter answered questions with appropriate attitude The presenter used correct and complete English sentences. The presentation was smooth and orderly. 2

Presenters 3 4 5

Total: Group Presentation (30 points 25%) 5 points each

1. The sequence of topics discussed was logically organized. 2. The group seemed to have distributed the presentation tasks equitably among themselves. 3. The transition between speakers was smooth and orderly. 4. The materials discussed were consistent with the contents of the Project Paper. 5. The group seemed to have distributed the development tasks equitably among themselves. 6. The group applied the concepts and principles learned in previous courses correctly and appropriately.

Rating

Total: Prototype and Documentation: (30 points 50%) 5 points each

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The document is neat and printed in draft mode, free of typos and Table of Contents should match the contents. Overall written quality of the project paper consider grammar, style and organization of ideas. Introduction The group presented the capsule view of the entire project. Current System The group clearly described the current system flow and made use of systems analysis tools. Proposed System The group described well the flow of the proposed solution and is cost beneficial. Design and Functionality The group clearly designed and fully functional of the following: the user interface, database, forms, reports and control techniques to be implemented, and is consistent with the objectives.

Rate

Total: Panelists Name and Signature: Date: