Sei sulla pagina 1di 17

EC.

3 1/8

MOMENT CONNECTION
EXAMPLE ACCORDING TO EC3 1 8 : 2005

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

1/17

EC.3 1/8

Column web panel in shear - 6.2.6.1 EC3 1 8 :2005

Shear area of the column (HEA160):

    2 
  2  
  3877  2 160 9 6 2 15 9  1321 
Plastic moment of the column:
, 

!"#
$
%&'

().+,)
+.--

 67.40 /0

Plastic moment of the column a flange:


,
, 

5
-.)12 342

%&'

-.)+6-75 ,)
+.--

 0.891 /0

Plastic moment of the column a stiffener (thickness of a stiffener = 15 mm):


5

-.) 12 93:2 3;<


$

,83, 

%&'

-.) +6-96+)5,)
+.--

 2.38 /0

Design plastic shear resistance:


= ,>

= ,>

= ,>

, ,+
, ,
,

KLM,NO 




(?"#,42,@A
;

(-.B7++-C
D,7

?"#,42,@A E?"#,;<,@A

 FGH= ,>

P.QRS TUV
XYZP

, ,+ ; = ,>

KLM,[OO,NO 

 9.40 /0

-.B7++-C E.DB+-C
D,7
, , J

 9.40 /0

P.Q\X]\]^_
X\.PP

 17.26 /0

Q. `P  \aa. a Q. `P  \Qa. ] bc

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

2/17

EC.3 1/8

Column web in transverse compression - 6.2.6.2 EC3 1 8 :2005

Effective width of column web in compression:

d

,,   5 e
  f 2   5 9 15 2 16  152 
Reduction factor for interaction with shear:
g  1 then h  h+
h+ 

k
<
i+E+.Dj l44,2,:2 :2 o
mn2

p+E+.Dqrs5tu
rC5r

 0.786

Slenderness of the web plate:

v   w  2 e
  f  152  2 9 15  104 

yyy
x  0.932 p l44,2,:2
z3 5

:2

:2
$

 0.932 p

+)+-(,)
+----65

 0.707 { 0.72 | }  1

Design resistance of stiffened column web:


~V,LV,NO 

bLV RR,V,LV LV RS
YZP

KLM,[OO,NO 

P.^a\\_]]^_

\.PP

Q. `P  ]P. _X bc

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

3/17

EC.3 1/8

Column web in transverse tension - 6.2.6.3 EC3 1 8 :2005

Effective width of column web in compression:

d

,,   5 e
  f  5 9 15  120 
Reduction factor for interaction with shear:
g  1 then h  h+
h+ 

kl44,2,:2 <:2

i+E+.Dj

mn2

p+E+.Dqr5'tu
rC5r

 0.849

Design resistance of stiffened column web:


~,LV,NO 

RR,V,LV LV RS
YZP

KLM,[OO,NO 

P.a`Q\]P]^_

\.PP

Q. `P  \^^. _P bc

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

4/17

EC.3 1/8

Column flange in transverse bending - 6.2.6.4 EC3 1 8 :2005

Resistance of the first row (bolt row adjacent to a stiffener):


Effective length:

  42  0.8 15  30 
  62 

 35 
D-

x+  D-ED)  0.46

|  5.60
6
x  D-ED)  0.95

G  FG ; 1.25   35 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

5/17

EC.3 1/8
Bolt-row considered individually:

,  2   188.50 
d

,    168 

,+  d

,  168  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  168 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:

]
`qP.]_RR,\ RV
uRS

~,\,NO 

`ZM,\,NO

,, 

?"#,5,@A E,C,@A

,D,  2

-.7;
k
%&5

YZP

2

~,NO,\  \]`. ^` bc

-.7()+--+.)

`eP.]_\aQ] f]^_
XP\.PP

 352.80 /0

5
q-.)l44,5 342
u
$ E,C,@A

E%&'

 \]`. ^` bc
e-.)+6B75 f,)ED)D).B+-C
D-ED)+.--

 218.76 /0

Resistance of the second row (inner bolt row):


Bolt-row considered individually:

,  2   188.50 

,  4  1.25  163.75 

,+  d

,  163.75  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  163.75 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:

]
`qP.]_RR,\ RV
uRS

~,\,NO 

`ZM,\,NO

,, 

?"#,5,@A E,C,@A

,D,  2

-.7;
k
%&5

YZP

2

~,NO,]  \]\. _a bc

-.7()+--+.)

`eP.]_\X.^_Q] f]^_
XP\.PP

 352.80 /0

5
q-.)l44,5 342
u
$ E,C,@A

E%&'

 \]\. _a bc

e-.)+6D.,)75 f,)ED)D).B+-C
D-ED)+.--

 218.03 /0

Resistance of the third row (bolt row adjacent to a stiffener):


Bolt-row considered individually:

,  2   188.50 

,    168 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

6/17

EC.3 1/8

,+  d

,  168  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  168 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:

]
`qP.]_RR,\ RV
uRS

~,\,NO 

`ZM,\,NO

,, 

?"#,5,@A E,C,@A

,D,  2

-.7;
k
%&5

YZP

2

~,NO,X  \]`. ^` bc

-.7()+--+.)

`eP.]_\aQ] f]^_
P.PX\.PP

 352.80 /0

5
q-.)l44,5 342
u
$ E,C,@A

E%&'

 \]`. ^` bc
e-.)+6B75 f,)ED)D).B+-C
D-ED)+.--

 218.76 /0

Resistance of the first row and second row considered as a part of a group

,  2    2 30 120  428.5 

,  e0.5   2  0.625 f 2  0.625 0.5   e0.5 120 5.6


30  2 30 0.625 35f 2 30 0.625 35 0.5 120  288 
d

,+  d

,  288  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  288 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


]
`qP.]_ RR,\ RV
uRS

~,\,NO 

`ZM,\,NO

,, 

?"#,5,@A E,C,@A

,D,  4

-.7;
k
%&5
E

4

~,NO,\9]  ]\X. a` bc

YZP

-.7()+--+.)

`eP.]_]aaQ] f]^_
XP\.PP

 705.6 /0

5
q-.) l44,5 342
u
$ E,C,@A

E%&'

 ]\X. a` bc
e-.)BB75 f,)ED),-).6+-C
D-ED)+.--

 429 /0

Resistance of the second row and third row considered as a part of a group

,  2    2 30 120  428.5 

,  e0.5   2  0.625 f 2  0.625 0.5   e0.5 120 5.6


30  2 30 0.625 35f 2 30 0.625 35 0.5 120  288 
For Mode 1:

,+  d

,  288  { d

,

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

7/17

EC.3 1/8

,  d

,  288 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


]
`qP.]_ RR,\ RV
uRS

~,\,NO 

`ZM,\,NO

,, 

?"#,5,@A E,C,@A

,D,  4

-.7;
k
%&5

4

~,NO,]9X  ]\X. a` bc

YZP

-.7()+--+.)

`eP.]_]aaQ] f]^_
XP\.PP

 705.6 /0

5
q-.) l44,5 342
u
$ E,C,@A

E%&'

 ]\X. a` bc
e-.)BB75 f,)ED),-).6+-C
D-ED)+.--

 429 /0

Resistance of the first row, the second row and third row considered as a part of a group

,  2   2  2 30 120 2 120  668.5 

,  2 e0.5   2  0.625 f  2 e0.5 120 5.6 30  2 30 0.625


35f 120  412.25 
d

,+  d

,  412.25  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  412.25 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


]
`qP.]_ RR,\ RV
uRS

~,\,NO 

`ZM,\,NO

,, 

?"#,5,@A E,C,@A

,D,  6

-.7;
k
%&5
E

6

~,NO,\9]9X  XP bc

YZP

-.7()+--+.)

`eP.]_`\].]_Q] f]^_
XP\.PP

 1058.4 /0

5
q-.) l44,5 342
u
$ E,C,@A

E%&'

 XP bc

e-.)(+.)75 f,)ED)+-)B.(+-C
D-ED)+.--

Summary of the resistance of the bolt row considered individually:


+ 3,

 124.74 121.58  246.32 /0 3,

D+ 3,

 124.74 121.58 124.74  371.06 /0 3,

D 3,

 124.74 121.58  246.32 /0 3,

,+9
,9D

 213.84 /0
 213.84 /0
,+99D

 306 /0

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

8/17

 640.5 /0

EC.3 1/8

End plate bending - 6.2.6.5 EC3 1 8 :2005

Resistance of the first row (bolt row below tension flange of beam)
Effective length:

  37  0.8  2  37  0.8 6 2  30.22 

  60 
 35 

D-.

x+  D-.ED)  0.46
6-

x  D-.ED)  0.92

|  5.70

G  FG ; 1.25   35 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

9/17

EC.3 1/8

Bolt-row considered individually:

,  2   2 30.22  189.9 

,    5.70 30.22  172.25 

,+  d

,  172.25  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  172.25 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


,+, 

(?"#,r,@A

~,],NO 

]ZM,],NO E~,X,NO

,D,  2

(e-.)l44,r 3"5 f
$

-.7;
k
%&5

%&'

2

-.7()+--+.)

(e-.)+,.)+65 f,)
D-.+.--

 352.80 /0

]eP.]_RR,] ]M fRS E~,X,NO


EYZP

 401.3 /0

]eP.]_\^].]_\] f]^_EX_X_].a\PX
XP.]]EX_\.PP

 ]a]. XP bc

~,NO,\  ]a]. XP bc
Resistance of the second row (inner bolt row):
Bolt-row considered individually:

,  2   2 30.22  189.9 

,  4  1.25  4 30.22 1.25 35  164.63 


d

,+  d

,  164.63  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  164.63 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


,+, 

(?"#,r,@A

~,],NO 

]ZM,],NO E~,X,NO

,D,  2

(e-.)l44,r 3"5 f
$

-.7;
k
%&5
E

%&'

2

-.7()+--+.)

(e-.)+6(.6D+65 f,)
D-.+.--

 352.80 /0

]eP.]_RR,] ]M fRS E~,X,NO


EYZP

 383.52 /0

]eP.]_\`.X\] f]^_EX_X_].a\PX
XP.]]EX_\.PP

 ]^a. \a bc

~,NO,]  ]^a. \a bc
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

10/17

EC.3 1/8
Resistance of the third row (end bolt row):
Bolt-row considered individually:

,  2   2 30.22  189.9 

,  4  1.25  4 30.22 1.25 35  164.63 


d

,+  d

,  164.63  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  164.63 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


,+, 

(?"#,r,@A

~,],NO 

]ZM,],NO E~,X,NO

,D,  2

(e-.)l44,r 3"5 f
$

-.7;
k
%&5

%&'

2

-.7()+--+.)

(e-.)+6(.6D+65 f,)
D-.+.--

 352.80 /0

]eP.]_RR,] ]M fRS E~,X,NO


EYZP

 383.52 /0

]eP.]_\`.X\] f]^_EX_X_].a\PX
XP.]]EX_\.PP

 ]^a. \a bc

~,NO,X  ]^a. \a bc
Resistance of the first row and second row considered as a part of a group

,  2    2 30.22 120  430 

,  e0.5   2  0.625 f 2  0.625 0.5   e0.5 120 5.7


30.22  2 30.22 0.625 35f 2 30.22 0.625 35 0.5 120  292.25 
d

,+  d

,  292.25  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  292.25 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


5
(q-.) l44,r 342
u
$

,+, 

(?"#,r,@A

~,],NO 

]ZM,],NO E~,X,NO

,D,  4
_X. Xa bc

-.7;
k
%&5
E

4

~,NO,\9]  _X. Xa bc

%&'

-.7()+--+.)

(e-.)7.)+65 f,)
D-.+.--

 705.6 /0

]
]qP.]_ RR,] RV
uRS E~,X,NO

EYZP

 680.83 /0

]eP.]_]Q].]_\] f]^_EX_^P_.\PX
XP.]]EX_\.PP

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

11/17

EC.3 1/8
Resistance of the second row and third row considered as a part of a group

,  2    2 30.22 120  430 

,  2 2  0.625 0.5   2 2 30.22 0.625 35 0.5 120  284.63 


d

,+  d

,  284.63  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  284.63 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


5
(q-.) l44,r 342
u
$

,+, 

(?"#,r,@A

~,],NO 

]ZM,],NO E~,X,NO

,D,  4

-.7;
k
%&5

4

_X]. ]^ bc

%&'

-.7()+--+.)

(e-.)B(.6D+65 f,)
D-.+.--

 705.6 /0

]
]qP.]_ RR,] RV
uRS E~,X,NO

EYZP

 663 /0

]eP.]_]a`.X\] f]^_EX_^P_.\PX
XP.]]EX_\.PP

~,NO,]9X  _X]. ]^ bc
Resistance of the first row, the second row and third row considered as a part of a group

,  2   2  2 30.22 120 2 120  669.9 

,  e0.5   2  0.625 f 2  0.625 0.5   e0.5 120 5.7


30.22  2 30.22 0.625 35f 120 2 30.22 0.625 35 0.5 120  412.25 
d

,+  d

,  412.25  { d

,

For Mode 1:

,  d

,  412.25 

For Mode 2:

Design resistance of a T - stub flange:


5
(q-.) l44,r 342
u
$

,+, 

(?"#,r,@A

~,],NO 

]ZM,],NO E~,X,NO

,D,  6
^QP. _ bc

-.7;
k
%&5

6

%&'

-.7()+--+.)

(e-.)(+.)+65 f,)
D-.+.--

 1058.4 /0

]
]qP.]_ RR,] RV
uRS E~,X,NO

EYZP

 960.4 /0

]eP.]_`\].]_\] f]^_EX_\P_a.`\PX
XP.]]EX_\.PP

~,NO,\9]9X  ^QP. _ bc
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

12/17

EC.3 1/8
Summary of the resistance of the bolt row considered individually:
+ 3,

 282.30 278.18  560.48 /0 3,

D+ 3,

 282.30 278.18 278.18  838.66 /0 3,

D 3,

 278.18 278.18  556.36 /0 3,

,+9
,9D

 536.38 /0
 532.27 /0
,+99D

 790.5 /0

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

13/17

EC.3 1/8

Beam web in compression - 6.2.6.7 EC3 1 8 :2005

--+6BED,B+6 +6E-.)D,B
--+6ED,B+6
R

 136.84 

~V,R,NO  L eL R  f Y S  \ X^a \  \X. a` \.PP  \\X\ bc


ZP

]^_

Beam web in tension - 6.2.6.8 EC3 1 8 :2005


R

~,L,NO  RR,,L L Y S

ZP

The effective width of the beam web in tension should be taken as equal to the effective length of the
equivalent T-stub representing the end plate in bending, obtained for an individual bolt row or a bolt group.
3, 1,

3, 1,
3, 1,
3, 1,

3, 1,
3, 1,

,+
,
,D

,)

,)

,)

 d

,3, 1 1 % $  172.25 16 +.--  757.9 /0


&'

 d

,3, 1 1 % $  164.63 16 +.--  724.4 /0


&'

 d

,3, 1 1 % $  164.63 16 +.--  724.4 /0

,+9
,9D

&'

,)

,)

 d

,3, 1 1 % $  292.25 16 +.--  1286 /0


&'

 d

,3, 1 1 % $  284.63 16 +.--  1252.4 /0

,+99D

&'

,)

 d

,3, 1 1 % $  412.25 16 +.--  1814 /0


&'

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

14/17

EC.3 1/8

ASSEMBLY OF THE COMPONENTS - 6.2.7.2 EC3 1 8 :2005


6.2.7.2 (6)
1. First bolt row considered as an individual bolt - row :
- The column web in tension:
3, ,  177.50 /0
- The column flange in bending:
~,RV,NO  \]`. ^` bc
- The end plate in bending:
3,d,  282.30 /0
- The beam web in tension:
3, 1,  757.9 /0
2. Second bolt row considered as an individual bolt - row:
- The column web in tension:
F,,  177.50 kN
- The column flange in bending:
~,RV,NO  \]\. _a bc
- The end plate in bending:
F,,  278.18 kN
- The beam web in tension:
F,,  724.4 kN
3. Third bolt row considered as an individual bolt - row :
- The column web in tension:
F,,  177.50 kN
- The column flange in bending:
F,,  \]`. ^`
- The end plate in bending:
F,,  278.18 kN
- The beam web in tension:
F,,  724.4 kN
6.2.7.2 (7)
4. Total design resistance:
D+ 3,

 124.74 121.58 124.74  371.06 /0

Then:
~,NO,\  \]`. ^` bc

~,NO,] 

:",@A

~,NO,X  P bc

 3,

,+

:",@A

+7B.
+

 198.2 /0

 198.2  124.74  ^X. ` bc

5. Total design resistance:


D+ 3, ,  124.74 121.58 124.74  371.06 /0 , ,  206.53 /0
Then:
3, ,+  124.74 /0
3, ,  , ,  3,
3, ,D  0 /0

,+

 206.53  124.74  81.79 /0 73.46 /0

6.2.7.2 (8) row considered as a part of a group:


+ 3,

 124.74 73.46  198.2 /0 { 3,

D+ 3,

 124.74 73.46 0  198.2 /0 { 3,

D 3,

 73.46 0  73.46 /0 { 3,

,9D

,+9

 213.84 /0

 213.84 /0
,+99D

 306 /0

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

15/17

EC.3 1/8

JOINT MOMENT RESISTANCE - 6.2.7.2 (1) EC3 1 8 :2005

124.74 kN
73.46 kN

Design moment resistance:

Z,NO  ~,NO,\ \ ~,NO,] ]  \]`. ^` P. XPQ_ ^X. ` P. \aQ_  _]. _X bc

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

16/17

EC.3 1/8

JOINT SHEAR RESISTANCE - EC3 1 8 :2005


a. Resistance of on bolt - row:
, 

-.);
k
%&5

-.)()+--+.)

 98 /0

KNO,\  ,L ~U,NO  ] Qa  \Q bc

b. Bearing resistance of the column flange of one bolt - row:


 FG

r
D '

/  FG 2.8

1, 

+
(

 ; 1  FG
d5

'

 1.00

D)

 1.7; 2.5  FG 2.8   1.7; 2.5  2.50

342

%&5

++
 ; 1
D
(

+.--.)-7-(D+.)

 154.8 /0

KNO,]  ,L ~,NO  ] \_`. a  XPQ. bc


The shear joint resistance is due to the resistance of the bolts, but the resistance of the single bolt row
should be reduced, as follow, in presence of shear and tensile force:
-

Shear resistance of the first bolt row:

Shear resistance of the first bolt row:

Shear resistance of the first bolt row:

196 kN

3,

,+  124.74 /0

-.(
K,NO,\  +.( = ,+  _ bc

3,

K,NO,] 

,  73.46 /0

-.(

=

_
bc

,+
+.(

3, ,D  0 /0

K,NO,X  = ,+  \Q bc

56 kN

Joint Shear Resistance:

196 kN

56 kN

196 kN

196 kN

K,NO  ] _ \Q  XPa bc

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Edit by Simone Caff and Emanuela Fantin 01 Ottobre 2010

17/17

Potrebbero piacerti anche