89%(9)Il 89% ha trovato utile questo documento (9 voti)

9K visualizzazioni402 pagineThe contents of this book are collected from Wikipedia based on E.T Bell's classic book "Men of Mathematics".

© Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

The contents of this book are collected from Wikipedia based on E.T Bell's classic book "Men of Mathematics".

Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)

89%(9)Il 89% ha trovato utile questo documento (9 voti)

9K visualizzazioni402 pagineThe contents of this book are collected from Wikipedia based on E.T Bell's classic book "Men of Mathematics".

Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)

Sei sulla pagina 1di 402

The Wikipedia Book of Men

of Mathematics

Contents

Articles

Men of Mathematics 1

Zeno of Elea 3

Zeno's paradoxes 5

Eudoxus of Cnidus 12

Archimedes 17

Archimedes' cattle problem 33

Book of Lemmas 36

Archimedes Palimpsest 39

Ren Descartes 45

Pierre de Fermat 58

List of things named after Pierre de Fermat 63

Blaise Pascal 64

Isaac Newton 75

Newton's laws of motion 98

Writing of Principia Mathematica 107

Method of Fluxions 114

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 114

Bernoulli family 136

Jacob Bernoulli 137

Johann Bernoulli 140

Bernoulli differential equation 143

Bernoulli distribution 145

Bernoulli number 147

Bernoulli polynomials 169

Bernoulli process 176

Bernoulli trial 182

Bernoulli's principle 184

Leonhard Euler 198

Joseph Louis Lagrange 210

Pierre-Simon Laplace 220

Gaspard Monge 239

Joseph Fourier 243

Jean-Victor Poncelet 249

Poncelet Prize 252

Carl Friedrich Gauss 254

Augustin-Louis Cauchy 265

Nikolai Lobachevsky 275

Niels Henrik Abel 279

Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi 286

William Rowan Hamilton 291

variste Galois 299

James Joseph Sylvester 306

Karl Weierstrass 310

Arthur Cayley 314

Sofia Kovalevskaya 319

George Boole 324

Charles Hermite 334

Leopold Kronecker 338

Bernhard Riemann 342

Ernst Kummer 346

Richard Dedekind 348

Henri Poincar 352

Georg Cantor 370

References

Article Sources and Contributors 384

Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 395

Article Licenses

License 399

Men of Mathematics

1

Men of Mathematics

Men of Mathematics is a book on the history of mathematics written in 1937 by the mathematician E.T. Bell. After a

brief chapter on three ancient mathematicians, the remainder of the book is devoted to the lives of about forty

mathematicians who worked in the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The emphasis is on mainstream

mathematics following on from the work.

To keep the interest of readers, the book typically focuses on unusual or dramatic aspects of its subjects' lives. Men

of Mathematics has inspired many young people, including the young John Forbes Nash Jr., to become

mathematicians. It is not intended as a rigorous history, includes many anecdotal accounts, and presents a somewhat

idealised picture of mathematicians, their personalities, research and controversies.

In reviewing the faculty that served with Harry Bateman at Caltech, Clifford Truesdell wrote:

...[Bell] was admired for his science fiction and his Men of Mathematics. I was shocked when, just a few years

later, Walter Pitts told me the latter was nothing but a string of Hollywood scenarios; my own subsequent

study of the sources has shown me that Pitts was right, and I now find the contents of that still popular book to

be little more than rehashes enlivened by nasty gossip and banal or indecent fancy..

[1]

An impression of the book was given by Rebecca Goldstein in her novel 36 Arguments for the Existence of God.

Describing a character Cass Seltzer, she wrote on page 105:

Right now he was reading E. T. Bells Men of Mathematics, which was the best yet, even though it had real

mathematics in to slow him down. Some of these people sounded as if they had to be changelings, non-human

visitors form some other sphere, with powers so prodigious they burst the boundaries of developmental

psychology, lisping out profundities while other children were playing with their toes.

[2]

Contents

Zeno (Fifth Century BC), Eudoxus (408355 BC), Archimedes (287?212 BC)

Descartes (15961650)

Fermat (16011665)

Pascal (16231662)

Newton (16421727)

Leibniz (16461716)

The Bernoullis (17th and 18th Century )

Euler (17071783)

Lagrange (17361813)

Laplace (1749 1827)

Monge (17461818), Fourier (17681830)

Poncelet (17881867)

Gauss (17771855)

Cauchy (17891857)

Lobachevsky (17931856)

Abel (18021829)

Jacobi (18041851)

Hamilton (18051865)

Galois (18111832)

Sylvester (18141897), Cayley (18211895)

Weierstrass (18151897), Sonja Kowalewski [sic] (18501891)

Boole (18151864)

Men of Mathematics

2

Hermite (18221901)

Kronecker (18231891)

Riemann (18261866)

Kummer (18101893), Dedekind (18311916)

Poincar (18541912)

Cantor (18451918)

Notes and references

[1] Truesdell, C. (1984). An idiot's fugitive essays on science: methods, criticism, training, circumstances. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

ISBN0-387-90703-3. "Genius and the establishment at a polite standstill in the modern university: Bateman", pages 423 to 424

[2] Quoted in the College Mathematics Journal 43(3):231 (May 2010)

External links

Men of Mathematics (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/ MenOfMathematics) at the Internet Archive

Zeno of Elea

3

Zeno of Elea

Zeno shows the Doors to Truth and Falsity (Veritas et Falsitas). Fresco in the Library of El Escorial, Madrid.

Born ca. 490 BC

Died ca. 430 BC (aged around 60)

Era Pre-Socratic philosophy

Region Western Philosophy

School Eleatic school

Maininterests Metaphysics, Ontology

Notableideas Zeno's paradoxes

Zeno of Elea (pron.: /zinovli/; Greek: ; ca. 490 BC ca. 430 BC) was a pre-Socratic Greek

philosopher of southern Italy and a member of the Eleatic School founded by Parmenides. Aristotle called him the

inventor of the dialectic.

[1]

He is best known for his paradoxes, which Bertrand Russell has described as

"immeasurably subtle and profound".

[2]

Life

Little is known for certain about Zeno's life. Although written nearly a century after Zeno's death, the primary source

of biographical information about Zeno is Plato's Parmenides dialogue.

[3]

In the dialogue, Plato describes a visit to

Athens by Zeno and Parmenides, at a time when Parmenides is "about 65," Zeno is "nearly 40" and Socrates is "a

very young man".

[4]

Assuming an age for Socrates of around 20, and taking the date of Socrates' birth as 469 BC

gives an approximate date of birth for Zeno of 490 BC. Plato says that Zeno was "tall and fair to look upon" and was

"in the days of his youth reported to have been beloved by Parmenides".

[4]

Other perhaps less reliable details of Zeno's life are given by Diogenes Lartius in his Lives and Opinions of Eminent

Philosophers,

[5]

where it is reported that he was the son of Teleutagoras, but the adopted son of Parmenides, was

"skilled to argue both sides of any question, the universal critic," and that he was arrested and perhaps killed at the

hands of a tyrant of Elea.

According to Plutarch, Zeno attempted to kill the tyrant Demylus, and failing to do so, "with his own teeth bit off his

tongue, he spit it in the tyrants face."

[6]

Works

Although many ancient writers refer to the writings of Zeno, none of his writings survive intact.

Plato says that Zeno's writings were "brought to Athens for the first time on the occasion of" the visit of Zeno and

Parmenides.

[4]

Plato also has Zeno say that this work, "meant to protect the arguments of Parmenides",

[4]

was written

in Zeno's youth, stolen, and published without his consent. Plato has Socrates paraphrase the "first thesis of the first

argument" of Zeno's work as follows: "if being is many, it must be both like and unlike, and this is impossible, for

neither can the like be unlike, nor the unlike like".

[4]

Zeno of Elea

4

According to Proclus in his Commentary on Plato's Parmenides, Zeno produced "not less than forty arguments

revealing contradictions",

[7]

but only nine are now known.

Zeno's arguments are perhaps the first examples of a method of proof called reductio ad absurdum, literally meaning

to reduce to the absurd. Parmenides is said to be the first individual to implement this style of argument. This form

of argument soon became known as the epicheirema (). In Book VII of his Topics, Aristotle says that an

epicheirema is "a dialectical syllogism". It is a connected piece of reasoning which an opponent has put forward as

true. The disputant sets out to break down the dialectical syllogism. This destructive method of argument was

maintained by him to such a degree that Seneca the Younger commented a few centuries later, "If I accede to

Parmenides there is nothing left but the One; if I accede to Zeno, not even the One is left."

[8]

Zeno's paradoxes

Zeno's paradoxes have puzzled, challenged, influenced, inspired, infuriated, and amused philosophers,

mathematicians, and physicists for over two millennia. The most famous are the so-called "arguments against

motion" described by Aristotle in his Physics.

[9]

Notes

[1] Diogenes Lartius, 8.57, 9.25

[2] [2] Russell, p. 347: "In this capricious world nothing is more capricious than posthumous fame. One of the most notable victims of posterity's

lack of judgement is the Eleatic Zeno. Having invented four arguments all immeasurably subtle and profound, the grossness of subsequent

philosophers pronounced him to be a mere ingenious juggler, and his arguments to be one and all sophisms. After two thousand years of

continual refutation, these sophisms were reinstated, and made the foundation of a mathematical renaissance..."

[3] Plato (370 BC). Parmenides (http:/ / classics.mit.edu/ Plato/ parmenides. html), translated by Benjamin Jowett. Internet Classics Archive.

[4] Plato, Parmenides 127b-e

[5] Diogenes Lartius. The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, translated by C.D. Yonge. London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853. Scanned and

edited for Peith's Web. (http:/ / classicpersuasion. org/ pw/ diogenes/ dlzeno-eleatic. htm)

[6] Plutarch, Against Colotes

[7] Proclus, Commentary on Plato's Parmenides, p.29

[8] Zeno in The Presocratics, Philip Wheelwright ed., The Odyssey Press, 1966, Pages 106-107.

[9] Aristotle (350 BC). Physics (http:/ / classics.mit.edu/ Aristotle/ physics. html), translated by R.P. Hardie and R.K. Gaye. Internet Classics

Archive.

References

Plato; Fowler, Harold North (1925) [1914]. Plato in twelve volumes. 8, The Statesman.(Philebus).(Ion). Loeb

Classical Library. trans. W. R. M. Lamb. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P. ISBN978-0-434-99164-8.

OCLC222336129.

Proclus; Morrow, Glenn R.; Dillon, John M. (1992) [1987]. Proclus' Commentary on Plato's Parmenides.

Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-02089-1. OCLC27251522.

Russell, Bertrand (1996) [1903]. The Principles of Mathematics. New York, NY: Norton.

ISBN978-0-393-31404-5. OCLC247299160.

Hornschemeier, Paul (2007). The Three Paradoxes. Seattle, WA: Fantagraphics Books.

Zeno of Elea

5

Further reading

Early Greek Philosophy Jonathan Barnes. (Harmondsworth, 1987).

"Zeno and the Mathematicians" G. E. L. Owen. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1957-8).

Paradoxes Mark Sainsbury. (Cambridge, 1988).

Zeno's Paradoxes Wesley C. Salmon, ed. (Indianapolis, 1970).

Zeno of Elea Gregory Vlastos in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Paul Edwards, ed.), (New York, 1967).

De compositie van de wereld Harry Mulisch. (Amsterdam, 1980).

External links

Zeno of Elea (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ zeno-elea) entry by John Palmer in the Stanford Encyclopedia

of Philosophy

Zeno of Elea (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/ Biographies/ Zeno_of_Elea. html) - MacTutor

Plato's Parmenides (http:/ / classics. mit. edu/ Plato/ parmenides. html).

Aristotle's Physics (http:/ / classics. mit. edu/ Aristotle/ physics. html).

Diogenes Lartius, Life of Zeno, translated by Robert Drew Hicks (1925).

Zeno's paradoxes

Zeno's paradoxes are a set of philosophical problems generally thought to have been devised by Greek philosopher

Zeno of Elea (ca. 490430 BC) to support Parmenides's doctrine that "all is one" and that, contrary to the evidence

of one's senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but an illusion.

It is usually assumed, based on Plato's Parmenides 128c-d, that Zeno took on the project of creating these paradoxes

because other philosophers had created paradoxes against Parmenides's view. Thus Zeno can be interpreted as saying

that to assume there is plurality is even more absurd than assuming there is only "the One". (Parmenides 128d). Plato

makes Socrates claim that Zeno and Parmenides were essentially arguing exactly the same point (Parmenides

128a-b).

Some of Zeno's nine surviving paradoxes (preserved in Aristotle's Physics

[1]

and Simplicius's commentary thereon)

are essentially equivalent to one another. Aristotle offered a refutation of some of them.

[1]

Three of the strongest and

most famousthat of Achilles and the tortoise, the Dichotomy argument, and that of an arrow in flightare

presented in detail below.

Zeno's arguments are perhaps the first examples of a method of proof called reductio ad absurdum also known as

proof by contradiction. They are also credited as a source of the dialectic method used by Socrates.

[2]

Some mathematicians, such as Carl Boyer, hold that Zeno's paradoxes are simply mathematical problems, for which

modern calculus provides a mathematical solution.

[3]

Some philosophers, however, say that Zeno's paradoxes and

their variations (see Thomson's lamp) remain relevant metaphysical problems.

[4][5][6]

The origins of the paradoxes

are somewhat unclear. Diogenes Laertius, a fourth source for information about Zeno and his teachings, citing

Favorinus, says that Zeno's teacher Parmenides was the first to introduce the Achilles and the Tortoise Argument.

But in a later passage, Laertius attributes the origin of the paradox to Zeno, explaining that Favorinus disagrees.

[7]

Zeno's paradoxes

6

The Paradoxes of Motion

Achilles and the tortoise

In a race, the quickest runner can never overtake the slowest, since the pursuer must first reach the point

whence the pursued started, so that the slower must always hold a lead. as recounted by Aristotle, Physics

VI:9, 239b15

In the paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise, Achilles is in a footrace with the tortoise. Achilles allows the tortoise a

head start of 100 metres, for example. If we suppose that each racer starts running at some constant speed (one very

fast and one very slow), then after some finite time, Achilles will have run 100 metres, bringing him to the tortoise's

starting point. During this time, the tortoise has run a much shorter distance, say, 10 metres. It will then take Achilles

some further time to run that distance, by which time the tortoise will have advanced farther; and then more time still

to reach this third point, while the tortoise moves ahead. Thus, whenever Achilles reaches somewhere the tortoise

has been, he still has farther to go. Therefore, because there are an infinite number of points Achilles must reach

where the tortoise has already been, he can never overtake the tortoise.

[8][9]

The dichotomy paradox

That which is in locomotion must arrive at the half-way stage before it arrives at the goal. as recounted by

Aristotle, Physics VI:9, 239b10

Suppose Homer wants to catch a stationary bus. Before he can get there, he must get halfway there. Before he can

get halfway there, he must get a quarter of the way there. Before traveling a quarter, he must travel one-eighth;

before an eighth, one-sixteenth; and so on.

The resulting sequence can be represented as:

This description requires one to complete an infinite number of tasks, which Zeno maintains is an impossibility.

This sequence also presents a second problem in that it contains no first distance to run, for any possible (finite) first

distance could be divided in half, and hence would not be first after all. Hence, the trip cannot even begin. The

paradoxical conclusion then would be that travel over any finite distance can neither be completed nor begun, and so

all motion must be an illusion.

This argument is called the Dichotomy because it involves repeatedly splitting a distance into two parts. It contains

some of the same elements as the Achilles and the Tortoise paradox, but with a more apparent conclusion of

motionlessness. It is also known as the Race Course paradox. Some, like Aristotle, regard the Dichotomy as really

just another version of Achilles and the Tortoise.

[10]

There are two versions of the dichotomy paradox. In the other version, before Homer could reach the stationary bus,

he must reach half of the distance to it. Before reaching the last half, he must complete the next quarter of the

distance. Reaching the next quarter, he must then cover the next eighth of the distance, then the next sixteenth, and

so on. There are thus an infinite number of steps that must first be accomplished before he could reach the bus, with

no way to establish the size of any "last" step. Expressed this way, the dichotomy paradox is very much analogous to

that of Achilles and the tortoise.

Zeno's paradoxes

7

The arrow paradox

If everything when it occupies an equal space is at rest, and if that which is in locomotion is always occupying

such a space at any moment, the flying arrow is therefore motionless.

[11]

as recounted by Aristotle, Physics

VI:9, 239b5

In the arrow paradox (also known as the fletcher's paradox), Zeno states that for motion to occur, an object must

change the position which it occupies. He gives an example of an arrow in flight. He states that in any one

(durationless) instant of time, the arrow is neither moving to where it is, nor to where it is not.

[12]

It cannot move to

where it is not, because no time elapses for it to move there; it cannot move to where it is, because it is already there.

In other words, at every instant of time there is no motion occurring. If everything is motionless at every instant, and

time is entirely composed of instants, then motion is impossible.

Whereas the first two paradoxes divide space, this paradox starts by dividing timeand not into segments, but into

points.

[13]

Three other paradoxes as given by Aristotle

Paradox of Place:

" if everything that exists has a place, place too will have a place, and so on ad infinitum."

[14]

Paradox of the Grain of Millet:

" there is no part of the millet that does not make a sound: for there is no reason why any such part should

not in any length of time fail to move the air that the whole bushel moves in falling. In fact it does not of itself

move even such a quantity of the air as it would move if this part were by itself: for no part even exists

otherwise than potentially."

[15]

The Moving Rows (or Stadium):

" concerning the two rows of bodies, each row being composed of an equal number of bodies of equal size,

passing each other on a race-course as they proceed with equal velocity in opposite directions, the one row

originally occupying the space between the goal and the middle point of the course and the other that between

the middle point and the starting-post. This...involves the conclusion that half a given time is equal to double

that time."

[16]

For an expanded account of Zeno's arguments as presented by Aristotle, see Simplicius' commentary On Aristotle's

Physics.

Proposed solutions

According to Simplicius, Diogenes the Cynic said nothing upon hearing Zeno's arguments, but stood up and walked,

in order to demonstrate the falsity of Zeno's conclusions. To fully solve any of the paradoxes, however, one needs to

show what is wrong with the argument, not just the conclusions. Through history, several solutions have been

proposed, among the earliest recorded being those of Aristotle and Archimedes.

Aristotle (384 BC322 BC) remarked that as the distance decreases, the time needed to cover those distances also

decreases, so that the time needed also becomes increasingly small.

[17][18]

Aristotle also distinguished "things

infinite in respect of divisibility" (such as a unit of space that can be mentally divided into ever smaller units while

remaining spatially the same) from things (or distances) that are infinite in extension ("with respect to their

extremities").

[19]

Before 212 BC, Archimedes had developed a method to derive a finite answer for the sum of infinitely many terms

that get progressively smaller. (See: Geometric series, 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + , The Quadrature of the

Parabola.) Modern calculus achieves the same result, using more rigorous methods (see convergent series, where the

"reciprocals of powers of 2" series, equivalent to the Dichotomy Paradox, is listed as convergent). These methods

Zeno's paradoxes

8

allow the construction of solutions based on the conditions stipulated by Zeno, i.e. the amount of time taken at each

step is geometrically decreasing.

[3][20]

Aristotle's objection to the arrow paradox was that "Time is not composed of indivisible nows any more than any

other magnitude is composed of indivisibles."

[21]

Saint Thomas Aquinas, commenting on Aristotle's objection, wrote

"Instants are not parts of time, for time is not made up of instants any more than a magnitude is made of points, as

we have already proved. Hence it does not follow that a thing is not in motion in a given time, just because it is not

in motion in any instant of that time."

[22]

Bertrand Russell offered what is known as the "at-at theory of motion". It

agrees that there can be no motion "during" a durationless instant, and contends that all that is required for motion is

that the arrow be at one point at one time, at another point another time, and at appropriate points between those two

points for intervening times. In this view motion is a function of position with respect to time.

[23][24]

Nick Huggett

argues that Zeno is begging the question when he says that objects that occupy the same space as they do at rest must

be at rest.

[13]

Peter Lynds has argued that all of Zeno's motion paradoxes are resolved by the conclusion that instants in time and

instantaneous magnitudes do not physically exist.

[25][26][27]

Lynds argues that an object in relative motion cannot

have an instantaneous or determined relative position (for if it did, it could not be in motion), and so cannot have its

motion fractionally dissected as if it does, as is assumed by the paradoxes.

Another proposed solution is to question one of the assumptions Zeno used in his paradoxes (particularly the

Dichotomy), which is that between any two different points in space (or time), there is always another point. Without

this assumption there are only a finite number of distances between two points, hence there is no infinite sequence of

movements, and the paradox is resolved. The ideas of Planck length and Planck time in modern physics place a limit

on the measurement of time and space, if not on time and space themselves. According to Hermann Weyl, the

assumption that space is made of finite and discrete units is subject to a further problem, given by the "tile argument"

or "distance function problem".

[28][29]

According to this, the length of the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle in

discretized space is always equal to the length of one of the two sides, in contradiction to geometry. Jean Paul Van

Bendegem has argued that the Tile Argument can be resolved, and that discretization can therefore remove the

paradox.

[3][30]

Hans Reichenbach has proposed that the paradox may arise from considering space and time as separate entities. In a

theory like general relativity, which presumes a single space-time continuum, the paradox may be blocked.

[31]

The paradoxes in modern times

Infinite processes remained theoretically troublesome in mathematics until the late 19th century. The epsilon-delta

version of Weierstrass and Cauchy developed a rigorous formulation of the logic and calculus involved. These works

resolved the mathematics involving infinite processes.

[32]

While mathematics can be used to calculate where and when the moving Achilles will overtake the Tortoise of

Zeno's paradox, philosophers such as Brown and Moorcroft

[4][5]

claim that mathematics does not address the central

point in Zeno's argument, and that solving the mathematical issues does not solve every issue the paradoxes raise.

Zeno's arguments are often misrepresented in the popular literature. That is, Zeno is often said to have argued that

the sum of an infinite number of terms must itself be infinitewith the result that not only the time, but also the

distance to be travelled, become infinite. However, none of the original ancient sources has Zeno discussing the sum

of any infinite series. Simplicius has Zeno saying "it is impossible to traverse an infinite number of things in a finite

time". This presents Zeno's problem not with finding the sum, but rather with finishing a task with an infinite number

of steps: how can one ever get from A to B, if an infinite number of (non-instantaneous) events can be identified that

need to precede the arrival at B, and one cannot reach even the beginning of a "last event"?

[4][5][6][33]

Today there is still a debate on the question of whether or not Zeno's paradoxes have been resolved. In The History

of Mathematics, Burton writes, "Although Zeno's argument confounded his contemporaries, a satisfactory

Zeno's paradoxes

9

explanation incorporates a now-familiar idea, the notion of a 'convergent infinite series.'"

[34]

Bertrand Russell offered

a "solution" to the paradoxes based on modern physics, but Brown concludes "Given the history of 'final resolutions',

from Aristotle onwards, it's probably foolhardy to think we've reached the end. It may be that Zeno's arguments on

motion, because of their simplicity and universality, will always serve as a kind of 'Rorschach image' onto which

people can project their most fundamental phenomenological concerns (if they have any)."

[4]

The quantum Zeno effect

In 1977,

[35]

physicists E. C. G. Sudarshan and B. Misra studying quantum mechanics discovered that the dynamical

evolution (motion) of a quantum system can be hindered (or even inhibited) through observation of the system.

[36]

This effect is usually called the "quantum Zeno effect" as it is strongly reminiscent of Zeno's arrow paradox.

This effect was first theorized in 1958.

[37]

Zeno behaviour

In the field of verification and design of timed and hybrid systems, the system behaviour is called Zeno if it includes

an infinite number of discrete steps in a finite amount of time.

[38]

Some formal verification techniques exclude these

behaviours from analysis, if they are not equivalent to non-Zeno behaviour.

[39][40]

In systems design these

behaviours will also often be excluded from system models, since they cannot be implemented with a digital

controller.

[41]

A simple example of a system showing Zeno behaviour is a bouncing ball coming to rest. The physics

of a bouncing ball can be mathematically analyzed in such a way, ignoring factors other than rebound, to predict an

infinite number of bounces.

Writings about Zenos paradoxes

Zenos paradoxes have inspired many writers

Leo Tolstoy in War and Peace (Part 11, Chapter I) discusses the race of Achilles and the tortoise when critiquing

"historical science".

In the dialogue "What the Tortoise Said to Achilles", Lewis Carroll describes what happens at the end of the race.

The tortoise discusses with Achilles a simple deductive argument. Achilles fails in demonstrating the argument

because the tortoise leads him into an infinite regression.

In Gdel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter, the various chapters are separated by dialogues between Achilles

and the tortoise, inspired by Lewis Carrolls works.

The Argentinian writer Jorge Luis Borges discusses Zenos paradoxes many times in his work, showing their

relationship with infinity. Borges also used Zenos paradoxes as a metaphor for some situations described by

Kafka. Borges traces, in an essay entitled "Avatars of the Tortoise", the many recurrences of this paradox in

works of philosophy. The successive references he traces are Agrippa the Skeptic, Thomas Aquinas, Hermann

Lotze, F.H. Bradley and William James.

[42]

In Tom Stoppard's play Jumpers, the philosopher George Moore attempts a practical disproof with bow and arrow

of the Dichotomy Paradox, with disastrous consequences for the hare and the tortoise.

Harry Mulisch's philosophical magnum opus, De compositie van de wereld (Amsterdam, 1980) is based on Zeno's

Paradoxes mostly. Along with Herakleitos' thoughts and Cusanus' coincidentia oppositorum they constitute the

foundation for his own system of the 'octave'.

In the novel Small Gods by Terry Pratchett the prophet Brutha encounters several Ephebian (Greek) philosophers

in the country, attempting to disprove Zeno's paradox by shooting arrows at a succession of tortoises. So far, this

has resulted only in a succession of "tortoise-kabobs."

Zeno's paradoxes

10

In popular culture

The Firesign Theatre's 1969 album How Can You Be in Two Places at Once When You're Not Anywhere at All

contains a section originally titled "The Policemen's Brawl" but retitled "Zeno's Evil" when released on CD. In

this segment, as the lead character is driving along in his new car, a series of audible highway signs reports that

the distance to the Antelope Freeway is 1 mile, then

1

2

mile, then

1

4

mile,

1

8

mile, and so on. The signs' monolog

is interrupted just after reaching the

1

512

mile mark.

The web comic xkcd makes reference to Zeno's paradoxes: the comic Advent Calendar

[43]

shows an advent

calendar version of Achilles and the Tortoise paradox, and the comic Proof

[44]

shows a courtroom where Zeno

claims to be able to prove that his client could not have killed anyone with an arrow, referencing the arrow

paradox.

Notes

[1] Aristotle's Physics (http:/ / classics. mit. edu/ Aristotle/ physics. html) "Physics" by Aristotle translated by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye

[2] ([fragment 65], Diogenes Laertius. IX (http:/ / classicpersuasion. org/ pw/ diogenes/ dlzeno-eleatic. htm) 25ff and VIII 57).

[3] Boyer, Carl (1959). The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=w3xKLt_da2UC&

dq=zeno+ calculus& q=zeno#v=snippet& q=zeno). Dover Publications. p.295. ISBN978-0-486-60509-8. . Retrieved 2010-02-26. "If the

paradoxes are thus stated in the precise mathematical terminology of continuous variables (...) the seeming contradictions resolve themselves."

[4] Brown, Kevin. "Zeno and the Paradox of Motion" (http:/ / www. mathpages. com/ rr/ s3-07/ 3-07. htm). Reflections on Relativity. . Retrieved

2010-06-06.

[5] Moorcroft, Francis. "Zeno's Paradox" (http:/ / web.archive. org/ web/ 20100418141459id_/ http:/ / www. philosophers. co. uk/ cafe/

paradox5. htm). Archived from the original (http:/ / www. philosophers. co. uk/ cafe/ paradox5. htm) on 2010-04-18. .

[6] Papa-Grimaldi, Alba (1996). "Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno's Paradoxes Miss the Point: Zeno's One and Many Relation and

Parmenides' Prohibition" (http:/ / philsci-archive.pitt.edu/ 2304/ 1/ zeno_maths_review_metaphysics_alba_papa_grimaldi. pdf) (PDF). The

Review of Metaphysics 50: 299314. .

[7] Diogenes Laertius, Lives, 9.23 and 9.29.

[8] "Math Forum" (http:/ / mathforum.org/ isaac/ problems/ zeno1. html). ., matchforum.org

[9] Huggett, Nick (2010). "Zeno's Paradoxes: 3.2 Achilles and the Tortoise" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ paradox-zeno/ #AchTor).

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Retrieved 2011-03-07.

[10] Huggett, Nick (2010). "Zeno's Paradoxes: 3.1 The Dichotomy" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ paradox-zeno/ #Dic). Stanford

Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Retrieved 2011-03-07.

[11] Aristotle. "Physics" (http:/ / classics. mit.edu/ Aristotle/ physics. 6. vi. html#752). The Internet Classics Archive. . "Zeno's reasoning,

however, is fallacious, when he says that if everything when it occupies an equal space is at rest, and if that which is in locomotion is always

occupying such a space at any moment, the flying arrow is therefore motionless. This is false, for time is not composed of indivisible moments

any more than any other magnitude is composed of indivisibles."

[12] Laertius, Diogenes (about 230 CE). "Pyrrho" (http:/ / en. wikisource. org/ wiki/ Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/ Book_IX#Pyrrho).

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. IX. passage 72. ISBN1-116-71900-2. .

[13] Huggett, Nick (2010). "Zeno's Paradoxes: 3.3 The Arrow" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ paradox-zeno/ #Arr). Stanford Encyclopedia

of Philosophy. . Retrieved 2011-03-07.

[14] Aristotle Physics IV:1, 209a25 (http:/ / classics. mit.edu/ Aristotle/ physics. 4. iv. html)

[15] Aristotle Physics VII:5, 250a20 (http:/ / classics. mit.edu/ Aristotle/ physics. 7. vii. html)

[16] Aristotle Physics VI:9, 239b33 (http:/ / classics.mit. edu/ Aristotle/ physics. 6. vi. html)

[17] [17] Aristotle. Physics 6.9

[18] Aristotle's observation that the fractional times also get shorter does not guarantee, in every case, that the task can be completed. One case in

which it does not hold is that in which the fractional times decrease in a harmonic series, while the distances decrease geometrically, such as:

1/2 s for 1/2 m gain, 1/3 s for next 1/4 m gain, 1/4 s for next 1/8 m gain, 1/5 s for next 1/16 m gain, 1/6 s for next 1/32 m gain, etc. In this case,

the distances form a convergent series, but the times form a divergent series, the sum of which has no limit. Archimedes developed a more

explicitly mathematical approach than Aristotle.

[19] [19] Aristotle. Physics 6.9; 6.2, 233a21-31

[20] George B. Thomas, Calculus and Analytic Geometry, Addison Wesley, 1951

[21] Aristotle. Physics (http:/ / classics. mit.edu/ Aristotle/ physics. 6. vi. html). VI. Part 9 verse: 239b5. ISBN0-585-09205-2. .

[22] [22] Aquinas. Commentary on Aristotle's Physics, Book 6.861

[23] Huggett, Nick (1999). Space From Zeno to Einstein. ISBN0-262-08271-3.

[24] Salmon, Wesley C. (1998). Causality and Explanation (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=uPRbOOv1YxUC& pg=PA198& lpg=PA198&

dq=at+ at+ theory+ of+ motion+ russell#v=onepage& q=at at theory of motion russell& f=false). p.198. ISBN978-0-19-510864-4. .

[25] Lynds, Peter. Zeno's Paradoxes: a Timely Solution (http:/ / philsci-archive. pitt. edu/ 1197/ )

Zeno's paradoxes

11

[26] [26] Lynds, Peter. Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity. Foundations of Physics Letter s (Vol. 16, Issue

4, 2003). doi:10.1023/A:1025361725408

[27] Times Up Einstein (http:/ / www. wired.com/ wired/ archive/ 13. 06/ physics. html), Josh McHugh, Wired Magazine, June 2005

[28] Van Bendegem, Jean Paul (17 March 2010). "Finitism in Geometry" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ geometry-finitism/

#SomParSolProDea). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Retrieved 2012-01-03.

[29] Cohen, Marc (11 December 2000). "ATOMISM" (https:/ / www. aarweb. org/ syllabus/ syllabi/ c/ cohen/ phil320/ atomism. htm). History of

Ancient Philosophy, University of Washington. . Retrieved 2012-01-03.

[30] van Bendegem, Jean Paul (1987). "Discussion:Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument". Philosophy of Science (Belgium) 54 (2): 295302.

doi:10.1086/289379. JSTOR187807.

[31] [31] Hans Reichenbach (1958) The Philosophy of Space and Time. Dover

[32] Lee, Harold (1965). "Are Zeno's Paradoxes Based on a Mistake?". Mind (Oxford University Press) 74 (296): 563570. JSTOR2251675.

[33] Huggett, Nick (2010). "Zeno's Paradoxes: 5. Zeno's Influence on Philosophy" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ paradox-zeno/ #ZenInf).

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Retrieved 2011-03-07.

[34] Burton, David, A History of Mathematics: An Introduction, McGraw Hill, 2010, ISBN 978-0-07-338315-6

[35] Sudarshan, E. C. G.; Misra, B. (1977). "The Zenos paradox in quantum theory". Journal of Mathematical Physics 18 (4): 756763.

Bibcode1977JMP....18..756M. doi:10.1063/1.523304

[36] W.M.Itano; D.J.Heinsen, J.J.Bokkinger, D.J.Wineland (1990). "Quantum Zeno effect" (http:/ / www. boulder. nist. gov/ timefreq/ general/

pdf/ 858. pdf) (PDF). PRA 41 (5): 22952300. Bibcode1990PhRvA..41.2295I. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.41.2295. .

[37] Khalfin, L.A. (1958). Soviet Phys. JETP 6: 1053. Bibcode1958JETP....6.1053K

[38] Paul A. Fishwick, ed. (1 June 2007). "15.6 "Pathological Behavior Classes" in chapter 15 "Hybrid Dynamic Systems: Modeling and

Execution" by Pieter J. Mosterman, The Mathworks, Inc." (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=cM-eFv1m3BoC& pg=SA15-PA22). Handbook of

dynamic system modeling. Chapman & Hall/CRC Computer and Information Science (hardcover ed.). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.

pp.1522 to 1523. ISBN978-1-58488-565-8. . Retrieved 2010-03-05.

[39] Lamport, Leslie (2002) (PDF). Specifying Systems (http:/ / research. microsoft. com/ en-us/ um/ people/ lamport/ tla/ book-02-08-08. pdf).

Addison-Wesley. p.128. ISBN0-321-14306-X. . Retrieved 2010-03-06.

[40] Zhang, Jun; Johansson, Karl; Lygeros, John; Sastry, Shankar (2001). "Zeno hybrid systems" (http:/ / aphrodite. s3. kth. se/ ~kallej/ papers/

zeno_ijnrc01. pdf). International Journal for Robust and Nonlinear control. . Retrieved 2010-02-28.

[41] Franck, Cassez; Henzinger, Thomas; Raskin, Jean-Francois (2002). A Comparison of Control Problems for Timed and Hybrid Systems

(http:/ / mtc. epfl. ch/ ~tah/ Publications/ a_comparison_of_control_problems_for_timed_and_hybrid_systems. html). . Retrieved 2010-03-02.

[42] Borges, Jorge Luis (1964). Labyrinths. London: Penguin. pp.237243. ISBN0-8112-0012-4.

[43] http:/ / xkcd. com/ 994/

[44] http:/ / xkcd. com/ 1153/

References

Kirk, G. S., J. E. Raven, M. Schofield (1984) The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of

Texts, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-27455-9.

Huggett, Nick (2010). "Zeno's Paradoxes" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ paradox-zeno/ ). Stanford

Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2011-03-07.

Plato (1926) Plato: Cratylus. Parmenides. Greater Hippias. Lesser Hippias, H. N. Fowler (Translator), Loeb

Classical Library. ISBN 0-674-99185-0.

Sainsbury, R.M. (2003) Paradoxes, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48347-6.

External links

Silagadze, Z . K. " Zeno meets modern science, (http:/ / uk. arxiv. org/ abs/ physics/ 0505042)"

Zeno's Paradox: Achilles and the Tortoise (http:/ / demonstrations. wolfram. com/

ZenosParadoxAchillesAndTheTortoise/ ) by Jon McLoone, Wolfram Demonstrations Project.

Kevin Brown on Zeno and the Paradox of Motion (http:/ / www. mathpages. com/ rr/ s3-07/ 3-07. htm)

Palmer, John (2008). "Zeno of Elea" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ zeno-elea/ ). Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy.

This article incorporates material from Zeno's paradox on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative

Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

Eudoxus of Cnidus

12

Eudoxus of Cnidus

Eudoxus of Cnidus (410 or 408 BC 355 or 347 BC) was a Greek astronomer, mathematician, scholar and student

of Plato. Since all his own works are lost, knowledge of him is obtained from secondary sources, such as Aratus's

poem on astronomy. Theodosius of Bithynia's important work, Sphaerics, may be based on a work of Eudoxus.

Life

His name Eudoxus means "honored" or "of good repute" (in Greek , from eu "good" and doxa "opinion,

belief, fame"). It is analogous to the Latin name Benedictus.

Eudoxus's father Aeschines of Cnidus loved to watch stars at night. Eudoxus first travelled to Tarentum to study with

Archytas, from whom he learned mathematics. While in Italy, Eudoxus visited Sicily, where he studied medicine

with Philiston.

Around 387 BC, at the age of 23, he traveled with the physician Theomedon, who according to Diogenes Lartius

some believed was his lover,

[1]

to Athens to study with the followers of Socrates. He eventually became the pupil of

Plato, with whom he studied for several months, but due to a disagreement they had a falling out. Eudoxus was quite

poor and could only afford an apartment at the Piraeus. To attend Plato's lectures, he walked the seven miles (11km)

each direction, each day. Due to his poverty, his friends raised funds sufficient to send him to Heliopolis, Egypt to

pursue his study of astronomy and mathematics. He lived there for 16 months. From Egypt, he then traveled north to

Cyzicus, located on the south shore of the Sea of Marmara, the Propontis. He traveled south to the court of

Mausolus. During his travels he gathered many students of his own.

Around 368 BC, Eudoxus returned to Athens with his students. According to some sources, around 367 he assumed

headship of the Academy during Plato's period in Syracuse, and taught Aristotle. He eventually returned to his native

Cnidus, where he served in the city assembly. While in Cnidus, he built an observatory and continued writing and

lecturing on theology, astronomy and meteorology. He had one son, Aristagoras, and three daughters, Actis, Philtis

and Delphis.

In mathematical astronomy, his fame is due to the introduction of the astronomical globe, and his early contributions

to understanding the movement of the planets.

His work on proportions shows tremendous insight into numbers; it allows rigorous treatment of continuous

quantities and not just whole numbers or even rational numbers. When it was revived by Tartaglia and others in the

16th century, it became the basis for quantitative work in science for a century, until it was replaced by the algebraic

methods of Descartes.

Craters on Mars and the Moon are named in his honor. An algebraic curve (the Kampyle of Eudoxus) is also named

after him

a

2

x

4

= b

4

(x

2

+ y

2

).

Mathematics

Eudoxus is considered by some to be the greatest of classical Greek mathematicians, and in all antiquity, second only

to Archimedes. He rigorously developed Antiphon's method of exhaustion, a precursor to the integral calculus which

was also used in a masterly way by Archimedes in the following century. In applying the method, Eudoxus proved

such mathematical statements as: areas of circles are to one another as the squares of their radii, volumes of spheres

are to one another as the cubes of their radii, the volume of a pyramid is one-third the volume of a prism with the

same base and altitude, and the volume of a cone is one-third that of the corresponding cylinder.

[2]

Eudoxus introduced the idea of non-quantified mathematical magnitude to describe and work with continuous

geometrical entities such as lines, angles, areas and volumes, thereby avoiding the use of irrational numbers. In doing

Eudoxus of Cnidus

13

so, he reversed a Pythagorean emphasis on number and arithmetic, focusing instead on geometrical concepts as the

basis of rigorous mathematics. Some Pythagoreans, such as Eudoxus' teacher Archytas, had believed that only

arithmetic could provide a basis for proofs. Induced by the need to understand and operate with incommensurable

quantities, Eudoxus established what may have been the first deductive organization of mathematics on the basis of

explicit axioms. The change in focus by Eudoxus stimulated a divide in mathematics which lasted two thousand

years. In combination with a Greek intellectual attitude unconcerned with practical problems, there followed a

significant retreat from the development of techniques in arithmetic and algebra.

[3]

The Pythagoreans had discovered that the diagonal of a square does not have a common unit of measurement with

the sides of the square; this is the famous discovery that the square root of 2 cannot be expressed as the ratio of two

integers. This discovery had heralded the existence of incommensurable quantities beyond the integers and rational

fractions, but at the same time it threw into question the idea of measurement and calculations in geometry as a

whole. For example, Euclid provides an elaborate proof of the Pythagorean theorem (Elements I.47), by using

addition of areas and only much later (Elements VI.31) a simpler proof from similar triangles, which relies on ratios

of line segments.

Ancient Greek mathematicians calculated not with quantities and equations as we do today, but instead they used

proportionalities to express the relationship between quantities. Thus the ratio of two similar quantities was not just a

numerical value, as we think of it today; the ratio of two similar quantities was a primitive relationship between

them.

Eudoxus was able to restore confidence in the use of proportionalities by providing an astounding definition for the

meaning of the equality between two ratios. This definition of proportion forms the subject of Euclid's Book V.

In Definition 5 of Euclid's Book V we read:

Magnitudes are said to be in the same ratio, the first to the second and the third to the fourth when, if any

equimultiples whatever be taken of the first and third, and any equimultiples whatever of the second and

fourth, the former equimultiples alike exceed, are alike equal to, or alike fall short of, the latter equimultiples

respectively taken in corresponding order.

Let us clarify it by using modern-day notation. If we take four quantities: a, b, c, and d, then the first and second

have a ratio ; similarly the third and fourth have a ratio .

Now to say that we do the following: For any two arbitrary integers, m and n, form the equimultiples

ma and mc of the first and third; likewise form the equimultiples nb and nd of the second and fourth.

If it happens that ma > nb, then we must also have mc > nd. If it happens that ma = nb, then we must also have

mc = nd. Finally, if it happens that ma < nb, then we must also have mc < nd.

Notice that the definition depends on comparing the similar quantities ma and nb, and the similar quantities mc and

nd, and does not depend on the existence of a common unit of measuring these quantities.

The complexity of the definition reflects the deep conceptual and methodological innovation involved. It brings to

mind the famous fifth postulate of Euclid concerning parallels, which is more extensive and complicated in its

wording than the other postulates.

The Eudoxian definition of proportionality uses the quantifier, "for every ..." to harness the infinite and the

infinitesimal, just as do the modern epsilon-delta definitions of limit and continuity.

Additionally, the Archimedean property stated as definition 4 of Euclid's book V is originally due not to Archimedes

but to Eudoxus.

[4]

Eudoxus of Cnidus

14

Astronomy

In ancient Greece, astronomy was a branch of mathematics; astronomers sought to create geometrical models that

could imitate the appearances of celestial motions. Identifying the astronomical work of Eudoxus as a separate

category is therefore a modern convenience. Some of Eudoxus' astronomical texts whose names have survived

include:

Disappearances of the Sun, possibly on eclipses

Oktaeteris (), on an eight-year lunisolar cycle of the calendar

Phaenomena () and Entropon (), on spherical astronomy, probably based on observations

made by Eudoxus in Egypt and Cnidus

On Speeds, on planetary motions

We are fairly well informed about the contents of Phaenomena, for Eudoxus' prose text was the basis for a poem of

the same name by Aratus. Hipparchus quoted from the text of Eudoxus in his commentary on Aratus.

Eudoxan planetary models

A general idea of the content of On Speeds can be gleaned from Aristotle's Metaphysics XII, 8, and a commentary by

Simplicius of Cilicia (6th century CE) on De caelo, another work by Aristotle. According to a story reported by

Simplicius, Plato posed a question for Greek astronomers: "By the assumption of what uniform and orderly motions

can the apparent motions of the planets be accounted for?" (quoted in Lloyd 1970, p.84). Plato proposed that the

seemingly chaotic wandering motions of the planets could be explained by combinations of uniform circular motions

centered on a spherical Earth, apparently a novel idea in the 4th century.

In most modern reconstructions of the Eudoxan model, the Moon is assigned three spheres:

The outermost rotates westward once in 24 hours, explaining rising and setting.

The second rotates eastward once in a month, explaining the monthly motion of the Moon through the zodiac.

The third also completes its revolution in a month, but its axis is tilted at a slightly different angle, explaining

motion in latitude (deviation from the ecliptic), and the motion of the lunar nodes.

The Sun is also assigned three spheres. The second completes its motion in a year instead of a month. The inclusion

of a third sphere implies that Eudoxus mistakenly believed that the Sun had motion in latitude.

The five visible planets (Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) are assigned four spheres each:

The outermost explains the daily motion.

The second explains the planet's motion through the zodiac.

The third and fourth together explain retrogradation, when a planet appears to slow down, then briefly reverse its

motion through the zodiac. By inclining the axes of the two spheres with respect to each other, and rotating them

in opposite directions but with equal periods, Eudoxus could make a point on the inner sphere trace out a

figure-eight shape, or hippopede.

Eudoxus of Cnidus

15

Importance of Eudoxan system

Callippus, a Greek astronomer of the 4th century, added seven spheres to Eudoxus' original 27 (in addition to the

planetary spheres, Eudoxus included a sphere for the fixed stars). Aristotle described both systems, but insisted on

adding "unrolling" spheres between each set of spheres to cancel the motions of the outer set. Aristotle was

concerned about the physical nature of the system; without unrollers, the outer motions would be transferred to the

inner planets.

A major flaw in the Eudoxan system is its inability to explain changes in the brightness of planets as seen from

Earth. Because the spheres are concentric, planets will always remain at the same distance from Earth. This problem

was pointed out in Antiquity by Autolycus of Pitane. Astronomers responded by introducing the deferent and

epicycle, which caused a planet to vary its distance. However, Eudoxus' importance to Greek astronomy is

considerable, as he was the first to attempt a mathematical explanation of the planets.

Ethics

Aristotle, in The Nicomachean Ethics

[5]

attributes to Eudoxus an argument in favor of hedonism, that is, that

pleasure is the ultimate good that activity strives for. According to Aristotle, Eudoxus put forward the following

arguments for this position:

1. 1. All things, rational and irrational, aim at pleasure; things aim at what they believe to be good; a good indication

of what the chief good is would be the thing that most things aim at.

2. Similarly, pleasure's opposite pain is universally avoided, which provides additional support for the idea that

pleasure is universally considered good.

3. 3. People don't seek pleasure as a means to something else, but as an end in its own right.

4. 4. Any other good that you can think of would be better if pleasure were added to it, and it is only by good that good

can be increased.

5. Of all of the things that are good, happiness is peculiar for not being praised, which may show that it is the

crowning good.

[6]

References

Evans, James (1998). The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford University Press.

ISBN0-19-509539-1. OCLC185509676.

Huxley, GL (1980). Eudoxus of Cnidus p. 465-7 in: the Dictionary of Scientific Biography, volume 4.

Lloyd, GER (1970). Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle. W.W. Norton.

Notes

[1] [1] Diogenes Laertius; VIII.87

[2] Morris Kline, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times Oxford University Press, 1972 pp. 48-50

[3] [3] ibid

[4] Knopp, Konrad (1951). Theory and Application of Infinite Series (English 2nd ed.). London and Glasgow: Blackie & Son, Ltd.. p.7.

[5] [5] largely in book ten

[6] [6] this particular argument is referenced in book one

Eudoxus of Cnidus

16

Further reading

De Santillana, G. (1968). "Eudoxus and Plato: A Study in Chronology". Reflections on Men and Ideas.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Huxley, G. L. (1963). "Eudoxian Topics". Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 4: 8396.

Knorr, Wilbur Richard (1986). The Ancient tradition of geometric problems. Boston: Birkhuser.

ISBN0-8176-3148-8.

Knorr, Wilbur Richard (1978). "Archimedes and the Pre-Euclidean Proportion Theory". Archives Intemationales

d'histoire des Sciences 28: 183244.

Neugebauer, O. (1975). A history of ancient mathematical astronomy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

ISBN0-387-06995-X.

Van der Waerden, B. L. (1988). Science Awakening (5th ed.). Leiden: Noordhoff.

External links

Working model and complete explanation of the Eudoxus's Spheres (http:/ / www. youtube. com/

watch?v=_SFzDYSqR_4)

Dennis Duke, "Statistical dating of the Phaenomena of Eudoxus", DIO, volume 15 (http:/ / www. dioi. org/ vols/

wf0. pdf) see pages 7 to 23

Diogenes Lartius, Life of Eudoxus, translated by Robert Drew Hicks (1925). Wikisource

Eudoxus of Cnidus (http:/ / www. britannica. com/ EBchecked/ topic/ 195005/ Eudoxus-of-Cnidus)

Britannica.com

Eudoxus of Cnidus (http:/ / www. math. tamu. edu/ ~don. allen/ history/ eudoxus/ eudoxus. html) Donald Allen,

Professor, Texas A&M University

Eudoxos of Knidos (Eudoxus of Cnidus): astronomy and homocentric spheres (http:/ / www. calstatela. edu/

faculty/ hmendel/ Ancient Mathematics/ Eudoxus/ Astronomy/ EudoxusHomocentricSpheres. htm) Henry

Mendell, Cal State U, LA

Herodotus Project: Extensive B+W photo essay of Cnidus (http:/ / www. losttrails. com/ pages/ Hproject/ Caria/

Cnidus/ Cnidus. html)

Models of Planetary MotionEudoxus (http:/ / faculty. fullerton. edu/ cmcconnell/ Planets. html#3), Craig

McConnell, Ph.D., Cal State, Fullerton

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Eudoxus of Cnidus" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Eudoxus. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

The Universe According to Eudoxus (http:/ / hsci. cas. ou. edu/ images/ applets/ hippopede. html) (Java applet)

Archimedes

17

Archimedes

Archimedes of Syracuse

(Greek: )

Archimedes Thoughtful by Fetti (1620)

Born c. 287BC

Syracuse, Sicily

Magna Graecia

Died c. 212BC (aged around

75)

Syracuse

Residence Syracuse, Sicily

Fields Mathematics

physics

engineering

astronomy

invention

Knownfor Archimedes' principle

Archimedes' screw

hydrostatics

levers

infinitesimals

Archimedes of Syracuse (Greek: ; c. 287BC c. 212BC) was a Greek mathematician, physicist,

engineer, inventor, and astronomer.

[1]

Although few details of his life are known, he is regarded as one of the leading

scientists in classical antiquity. Among his advances in physics are the foundations of hydrostatics, statics and an

explanation of the principle of the lever. He is credited with designing innovative machines, including siege engines

and the screw pump that bears his name. Modern experiments have tested claims that Archimedes designed

machines capable of lifting attacking ships out of the water and setting ships on fire using an array of mirrors.

[2]

Archimedes is generally considered to be the greatest mathematician of antiquity and one of the greatest of all

time.

[3][4]

He used the method of exhaustion to calculate the area under the arc of a parabola with the summation of

an infinite series, and gave a remarkably accurate approximation of pi.

[5]

He also defined the spiral bearing his name,

formulae for the volumes of surfaces of revolution and an ingenious system for expressing very large numbers.

Archimedes

18

Archimedes died during the Siege of Syracuse when he was killed by a Roman soldier despite orders that he should

not be harmed. Cicero describes visiting the tomb of Archimedes, which was surmounted by a sphere inscribed

within a cylinder. Archimedes had proven that the sphere has two thirds of the volume and surface area of the

cylinder (including the bases of the latter), and regarded this as the greatest of his mathematical achievements.

Unlike his inventions, the mathematical writings of Archimedes were little known in antiquity. Mathematicians from

Alexandria read and quoted him, but the first comprehensive compilation was not made until c. 530AD by Isidore of

Miletus, while commentaries on the works of Archimedes written by Eutocius in the sixth century AD opened them

to wider readership for the first time. The relatively few copies of Archimedes' written work that survived through

the Middle Ages were an influential source of ideas for scientists during the Renaissance,

[6]

while the discovery in

1906 of previously unknown works by Archimedes in the Archimedes Palimpsest has provided new insights into

how he obtained mathematical results.

[7]

Biography

This bronze statue of Archimedes is at the

Archenhold Observatory in Berlin. It was

sculpted by Gerhard Thieme and unveiled in

1972.

Archimedes was born c. 287BC in the seaport city of Syracuse, Sicily,

at that time a self-governing colony in Magna Graecia. The date of

birth is based on a statement by the Byzantine Greek historian John

Tzetzes that Archimedes lived for 75 years.

[8]

In The Sand Reckoner,

Archimedes gives his father's name as Phidias, an astronomer about

whom nothing is known. Plutarch wrote in his Parallel Lives that

Archimedes was related to King Hiero II, the ruler of Syracuse.

[9]

A

biography of Archimedes was written by his friend Heracleides but this

work has been lost, leaving the details of his life obscure.

[10]

It is

unknown, for instance, whether he ever married or had children.

During his youth, Archimedes may have studied in Alexandria, Egypt,

where Conon of Samos and Eratosthenes of Cyrene were

contemporaries. He referred to Conon of Samos as his friend, while

two of his works (The Method of Mechanical Theorems and the Cattle Problem) have introductions addressed to

Eratosthenes.

[a]

Archimedes died c. 212BC during the Second Punic War, when Roman forces under General Marcus Claudius

Marcellus captured the city of Syracuse after a two-year-long siege. According to the popular account given by

Plutarch, Archimedes was contemplating a mathematical diagram when the city was captured. A Roman soldier

commanded him to come and meet General Marcellus but he declined, saying that he had to finish working on the

problem. The soldier was enraged by this, and killed Archimedes with his sword. Plutarch also gives a lesser-known

account of the death of Archimedes which suggests that he may have been killed while attempting to surrender to a

Roman soldier. According to this story, Archimedes was carrying mathematical instruments, and was killed because

the soldier thought that they were valuable items. General Marcellus was reportedly angered by the death of

Archimedes, as he considered him a valuable scientific asset and had ordered that he not be harmed.

[11]

Archimedes

19

A sphere has 2/3 the volume and surface area of

its circumscribing cylinder. A sphere and cylinder

were placed on the tomb of Archimedes at his

request.

The last words attributed to Archimedes are "Do not disturb my

circles" (Greek: ), a reference to the

circles in the mathematical drawing that he was supposedly studying

when disturbed by the Roman soldier. This quote is often given in

Latin as "Noli turbare circulos meos," but there is no reliable evidence

that Archimedes uttered these words and they do not appear in the

account given by Plutarch.

[11]

The tomb of Archimedes carried a sculpture illustrating his favorite

mathematical proof, consisting of a sphere and a cylinder of the same

height and diameter. Archimedes had proven that the volume and

surface area of the sphere are two thirds that of the cylinder including

its bases. In 75BC, 137 years after his death, the Roman orator Cicero

was serving as quaestor in Sicily. He had heard stories about the tomb

of Archimedes, but none of the locals was able to give him the

location. Eventually he found the tomb near the Agrigentine gate in

Syracuse, in a neglected condition and overgrown with bushes. Cicero

had the tomb cleaned up, and was able to see the carving and read some of the verses that had been added as an

inscription.

[12]

A tomb discovered in a hotel courtyard in Syracuse in the early 1960s was claimed to be that of

Archimedes, but its location today is unknown.

[13]

The standard versions of the life of Archimedes were written long after his death by the historians of Ancient Rome.

The account of the siege of Syracuse given by Polybius in his Universal History was written around seventy years

after Archimedes' death, and was used subsequently as a source by Plutarch and Livy. It sheds little light on

Archimedes as a person, and focuses on the war machines that he is said to have built in order to defend the city.

[14]

Discoveries and inventions

Archimedes' principle

Archimedes may have used his principle of

buoyancy to determine whether the golden crown

was less dense than solid gold.

The most widely known anecdote about Archimedes tells of how he

invented a method for determining the volume of an object with an

irregular shape. According to Vitruvius, a votive crown for a temple

had been made for King Hiero II, who had supplied the pure gold to be

used, and Archimedes was asked to determine whether some silver had

been substituted by the dishonest goldsmith.

[15]

Archimedes had to

solve the problem without damaging the crown, so he could not melt it

down into a regularly shaped body in order to calculate its density.

While taking a bath, he noticed that the level of the water in the tub

rose as he got in, and realized that this effect could be used to

determine the volume of the crown. For practical purposes water is

incompressible,

[16]

so the submerged crown would displace an amount

of water equal to its own volume. By dividing the mass of the crown

by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be

obtained. This density would be lower than that of gold if cheaper and

less dense metals had been added. Archimedes then took to the streets

naked, so excited by his discovery that he had forgotten to dress,

Archimedes

20

crying "Eureka!" (Greek: "!," meaning "I have found it!"). The test was conducted successfully, proving that

silver had indeed been mixed in.

[17]

The story of the golden crown does not appear in the known works of Archimedes. Moreover, the practicality of the

method it describes has been called into question, due to the extreme accuracy with which one would have to

measure the water displacement.

[18]

Archimedes may have instead sought a solution that applied the principle known

in hydrostatics as Archimedes' principle, which he describes in his treatise On Floating Bodies. This principle states

that a body immersed in a fluid experiences a buoyant force equal to the weight of the fluid it displaces.

[19]

Using

this principle, it would have been possible to compare the density of the golden crown to that of solid gold by

balancing the crown on a scale with a gold reference sample, then immersing the apparatus in water. The difference

in density between the two samples would cause the scale to tip accordingly. Galileo considered it "probable that this

method is the same that Archimedes followed, since, besides being very accurate, it is based on demonstrations

found by Archimedes himself."

[20]

Archimedes' screw

The Archimedes screw can raise water efficiently.

A large part of Archimedes' work in engineering arose from fulfilling

the needs of his home city of Syracuse. The Greek writer Athenaeus of

Naucratis described how King Hiero II commissioned Archimedes to

design a huge ship, the Syracusia, which could be used for luxury

travel, carrying supplies, and as a naval warship. The Syracusia is said

to have been the largest ship built in classical antiquity.

[21]

According

to Athenaeus, it was capable of carrying 600 people and included

garden decorations, a gymnasium and a temple dedicated to the

goddess Aphrodite among its facilities. Since a ship of this size would

leak a considerable amount of water through the hull, the Archimedes

screw was purportedly developed in order to remove the bilge water.

Archimedes' machine was a device with a revolving screw-shaped blade inside a cylinder. It was turned by hand, and

could also be used to transfer water from a low-lying body of water into irrigation canals. The Archimedes screw is

still in use today for pumping liquids and granulated solids such as coal and grain. The Archimedes screw described

in Roman times by Vitruvius may have been an improvement on a screw pump that was used to irrigate the Hanging

Gardens of Babylon.

[22][23][24]

The world's first seagoing steamship with a screw propeller was the SS Archimedes,

which was launched in 1839 and named in honor of Archimedes and his work on the screw.

[25]

Claw of Archimedes

The Claw of Archimedes is a weapon that he is said to have designed in order to defend the city of Syracuse. Also

known as "the ship shaker," the claw consisted of a crane-like arm from which a large metal grappling hook was

suspended. When the claw was dropped onto an attacking ship the arm would swing upwards, lifting the ship out of

the water and possibly sinking it. There have been modern experiments to test the feasibility of the claw, and in 2005

a television documentary entitled Superweapons of the Ancient World built a version of the claw and concluded that

it was a workable device.

[26][27]

Archimedes

21

Heat ray

Archimedes may have used mirrors acting

collectively as a parabolic reflector to burn ships

attacking Syracuse.

The 2nd century AD author Lucian wrote that during the Siege of

Syracuse (c. 214212BC), Archimedes destroyed enemy ships with

fire. Centuries later, Anthemius of Tralles mentions burning-glasses as

Archimedes' weapon.

[28]

The device, sometimes called the

"Archimedes heat ray", was used to focus sunlight onto approaching

ships, causing them to catch fire.

This purported weapon has been the subject of ongoing debate about

its credibility since the Renaissance. Ren Descartes rejected it as

false, while modern researchers have attempted to recreate the effect

using only the means that would have been available to

Archimedes.

[29]

It has been suggested that a large array of highly

polished bronze or copper shields acting as mirrors could have been

employed to focus sunlight onto a ship. This would have used the

principle of the parabolic reflector in a manner similar to a solar

furnace.

A test of the Archimedes heat ray was carried out in 1973 by the Greek

scientist Ioannis Sakkas. The experiment took place at the Skaramagas naval base outside Athens. On this occasion

70 mirrors were used, each with a copper coating and a size of around five by three feet (1.5 by 1m). The mirrors

were pointed at a plywood mock-up of a Roman warship at a distance of around 160feet (50m). When the mirrors

were focused accurately, the ship burst into flames within a few seconds. The plywood ship had a coating of tar

paint, which may have aided combustion.

[30]

A coating of tar would have been commonplace on ships in the

classical era.

[d]

In October 2005 a group of students from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology carried out an experiment with

127 one-foot (30cm) square mirror tiles, focused on a mock-up wooden ship at a range of around 100feet (30m).

Flames broke out on a patch of the ship, but only after the sky had been cloudless and the ship had remained

stationary for around ten minutes. It was concluded that the device was a feasible weapon under these conditions.

The MIT group repeated the experiment for the television show MythBusters, using a wooden fishing boat in San

Francisco as the target. Again some charring occurred, along with a small amount of flame. In order to catch fire,

wood needs to reach its autoignition temperature, which is around 300 C (570F).

[31][32]

When MythBusters broadcast the result of the San Francisco experiment in January 2006, the claim was placed in the

category of "busted" (or failed) because of the length of time and the ideal weather conditions required for

combustion to occur. It was also pointed out that since Syracuse faces the sea towards the east, the Roman fleet

would have had to attack during the morning for optimal gathering of light by the mirrors. MythBusters also pointed

out that conventional weaponry, such as flaming arrows or bolts from a catapult, would have been a far easier way of

setting a ship on fire at short distances.

[2]

In December 2010, MythBusters again looked at the heat ray story in a special edition featuring Barack Obama,

entitled President's Challenge. Several experiments were carried out, including a large scale test with 500

schoolchildren aiming mirrors at a mock-up of a Roman sailing ship 400feet (120m) away. In all of the

experiments, the sail failed to reach the 210 C (410F) required to catch fire, and the verdict was again "busted".

The show concluded that a more likely effect of the mirrors would have been blinding, dazzling, or distracting the

crew of the ship.

[33]

Archimedes

22

Other discoveries and inventions

While Archimedes did not invent the lever, he gave an explanation of the principle involved in his work On the

Equilibrium of Planes. Earlier descriptions of the lever are found in the Peripatetic school of the followers of

Aristotle, and are sometimes attributed to Archytas.

[34][35]

According to Pappus of Alexandria, Archimedes' work on

levers caused him to remark: "Give me a place to stand on, and I will move the Earth." (Greek: -

-)

[36]

Plutarch describes how Archimedes designed block-and-tackle pulley systems, allowing sailors

to use the principle of leverage to lift objects that would otherwise have been too heavy to move.

[37]

Archimedes has

also been credited with improving the power and accuracy of the catapult, and with inventing the odometer during

the First Punic War. The odometer was described as a cart with a gear mechanism that dropped a ball into a

container after each mile traveled.

[38]

Cicero (10643BC) mentions Archimedes briefly in his dialogue De re publica, which portrays a fictional

conversation taking place in 129BC. After the capture of Syracuse c. 212BC, General Marcus Claudius Marcellus is

said to have taken back to Rome two mechanisms, constructed by Archimedes and used as aids in astronomy, which

showed the motion of the Sun, Moon and five planets. Cicero mentions similar mechanisms designed by Thales of

Miletus and Eudoxus of Cnidus. The dialogue says that Marcellus kept one of the devices as his only personal loot

from Syracuse, and donated the other to the Temple of Virtue in Rome. Marcellus' mechanism was demonstrated,

according to Cicero, by Gaius Sulpicius Gallus to Lucius Furius Philus, who described it thus:

Hanc sphaeram Gallus cum moveret, fiebat ut soli luna totidem conversionibus in aere illo quot diebus in ipso

caelo succederet, ex quo et in caelo sphaera solis fieret eadem illa defectio, et incideret luna tum in eam metam

quae esset umbra terrae, cum sol e regione. When Gallus moved the globe, it happened that the Moon

followed the Sun by as many turns on that bronze contrivance as in the sky itself, from which also in the sky

the Sun's globe became to have that same eclipse, and the Moon came then to that position which was its

shadow on the Earth, when the Sun was in line.

[39][40]

This is a description of a planetarium or orrery. Pappus of Alexandria stated that Archimedes had written a

manuscript (now lost) on the construction of these mechanisms entitled On Sphere-Making. Modern research in this

area has been focused on the Antikythera mechanism, another device from classical antiquity that was probably

designed for the same purpose. Constructing mechanisms of this kind would have required a sophisticated

knowledge of differential gearing. This was once thought to have been beyond the range of the technology available

in ancient times, but the discovery of the Antikythera mechanism in 1902 has confirmed that devices of this kind

were known to the ancient Greeks.

[41][42]

Archimedes

23

Mathematics

While he is often regarded as a designer of mechanical devices, Archimedes also made contributions to the field of

mathematics. Plutarch wrote: "He placed his whole affection and ambition in those purer speculations where there

can be no reference to the vulgar needs of life."

[43]

Archimedes used Pythagoras' Theorem to

calculate the side of the 12-gon from that of the

hexagon and for each subsequent doubling of the

sides of the regular polygon.

Archimedes was able to use infinitesimals in a way that is similar to

modern integral calculus. Through proof by contradiction (reductio ad

absurdum), he could give answers to problems to an arbitrary degree of

accuracy, while specifying the limits within which the answer lay. This

technique is known as the method of exhaustion, and he employed it to

approximate the value of . In Measurement of a Circle he did this by

drawing a larger regular hexagon outside a circle and a smaller regular

hexagon inside the circle, and progressively doubling the number of

sides of each regular polygon, calculating the length of a side of each

polygon at each step. As the number of sides increases, it becomes a

more accurate approximation of a circle. After four such steps, when

the polygons had 96 sides each, he was able to determine that the value

of lay between 3

1

7

(approximately 3.1429) and 3

10

71

(approximately 3.1408), consistent with its actual value of

approximately 3.1416.

[44]

He also proved that the area of a circle was equal to multiplied by the square of the

radius of the circle (r

2

). In On the Sphere and Cylinder, Archimedes postulates that any magnitude when added to

itself enough times will exceed any given magnitude. This is the Archimedean property of real numbers.

[45]

In Measurement of a Circle, Archimedes gives the value of the square root of 3 as lying between

265

153

(approximately 1.7320261) and

1351

780

(approximately 1.7320512). The actual value is approximately 1.7320508,

making this a very accurate estimate. He introduced this result without offering any explanation of how he had

obtained it. This aspect of the work of Archimedes caused John Wallis to remark that he was: "as it were of set

purpose to have covered up the traces of his investigation as if he had grudged posterity the secret of his method of

inquiry while he wished to extort from them assent to his results."

[46]

It is possible that he used an iterative procedure

to calculate these values.

[47]

Archimedes

24

As proven by Archimedes, the area of the

parabolic segment in the upper figure is equal to

4/3 that of the inscribed triangle in the lower

figure.

In The Quadrature of the Parabola, Archimedes proved that the area

enclosed by a parabola and a straight line is

4

3

times the area of a

corresponding inscribed triangle as shown in the figure at right. He

expressed the solution to the problem as an infinite geometric series

with the common ratio

1

4

:

If the first term in this series is the area of the triangle, then the second

is the sum of the areas of two triangles whose bases are the two smaller

secant lines, and so on. This proof uses a variation of the series 1/4 +

1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + which sums to

1

3

.

In The Sand Reckoner, Archimedes set out to calculate the number of

grains of sand that the universe could contain. In doing so, he

challenged the notion that the number of grains of sand was too large

to be counted. He wrote: "There are some, King Gelo (Gelo II, son of

Hiero II), who think that the number of the sand is infinite in

multitude; and I mean by the sand not only that which exists about

Syracuse and the rest of Sicily but also that which is found in every

region whether inhabited or uninhabited." To solve the problem,

Archimedes devised a system of counting based on the myriad. The

word is from the Greek murias, for the number 10,000. He

proposed a number system using powers of a myriad of myriads (100

million) and concluded that the number of grains of sand required to fill the universe would be 8 vigintillion, or

810

63

.

[48]

Writings

The works of Archimedes were written in Doric Greek, the dialect of ancient Syracuse.

[49]

The written work of

Archimedes has not survived as well as that of Euclid, and seven of his treatises are known to have existed only

through references made to them by other authors. Pappus of Alexandria mentions On Sphere-Making and another

work on polyhedra, while Theon of Alexandria quotes a remark about refraction from the now-lost Catoptrica.

[b]

During his lifetime, Archimedes made his work known through correspondence with the mathematicians in

Alexandria. The writings of Archimedes were collected by the Byzantine architect Isidore of Miletus (c. 530AD),

while commentaries on the works of Archimedes written by Eutocius in the sixth century AD helped to bring his

work a wider audience. Archimedes' work was translated into Arabic by Thbit ibn Qurra (836901AD), and Latin

by Gerard of Cremona (c. 11141187AD). During the Renaissance, the Editio Princeps (First Edition) was

published in Basel in 1544 by Johann Herwagen with the works of Archimedes in Greek and Latin.

[50]

Around the

year 1586 Galileo Galilei invented a hydrostatic balance for weighing metals in air and water after apparently being

inspired by the work of Archimedes.

[51]

Archimedes

25

Surviving works

Archimedes is said to have remarked of the lever:

Give me a place to stand on, and I will move the

Earth.

On the Equilibrium of Planes (two volumes)

The first book is in fifteen propositions with seven postulates,

while the second book is in ten propositions. In this work

Archimedes explains the Law of the Lever, stating, "Magnitudes

are in equilibrium at distances reciprocally proportional to their

weights."

Archimedes uses the principles derived to calculate the areas and

centers of gravity of various geometric figures including

triangles, parallelograms and parabolas.

[52]

On the Measurement of a Circle

This is a short work consisting of three propositions. It is written in the form of a correspondence with

Dositheus of Pelusium, who was a student of Conon of Samos. In Proposition II, Archimedes gives an

approximation of the value of pi (), showing that it is greater than

223

71

and less than

22

7

.

On Spirals

This work of 28 propositions is also addressed to Dositheus. The treatise defines what is now called the

Archimedean spiral. It is the locus of points corresponding to the locations over time of a point moving away

from a fixed point with a constant speed along a line which rotates with constant angular velocity.

Equivalently, in polar coordinates (r, ) it can be described by the equation

with real numbers a and b. This is an early example of a mechanical curve (a curve traced by a moving point)

considered by a Greek mathematician.

On the Sphere and the Cylinder (two volumes)

In this treatise addressed to Dositheus, Archimedes obtains the result of which he was most proud, namely the

relationship between a sphere and a circumscribed cylinder of the same height and diameter. The volume is

4

3

r

3

for the sphere, and 2r

3

for the cylinder. The surface area is 4r

2

for the sphere, and 6r

2

for the

cylinder (including its two bases), where r is the radius of the sphere and cylinder. The sphere has a volume

two-thirds that of the circumscribed cylinder. Similarly, the sphere has an area two-thirds that of the cylinder

(including the bases). A sculpted sphere and cylinder were placed on the tomb of Archimedes at his request.

On Conoids and Spheroids

This is a work in 32 propositions addressed to Dositheus. In this treatise Archimedes calculates the areas and

volumes of sections of cones, spheres, and paraboloids.

On Floating Bodies (two volumes)

In the first part of this treatise, Archimedes spells out the law of equilibrium of fluids, and proves that water

will adopt a spherical form around a center of gravity. This may have been an attempt at explaining the theory

of contemporary Greek astronomers such as Eratosthenes that the Earth is round. The fluids described by

Archimedes are not self-gravitating, since he assumes the existence of a point towards which all things fall in

order to derive the spherical shape.

In the second part, he calculates the equilibrium positions of sections of paraboloids. This was probably an

idealization of the shapes of ships' hulls. Some of his sections float with the base under water and the summit

above water, similar to the way that icebergs float. Archimedes' principle of buoyancy is given in the work,

stated as follows:

Archimedes

26

Any body wholly or partially immersed in a fluid experiences an upthrust equal to, but opposite in sense

to, the weight of the fluid displaced.

The Quadrature of the Parabola

In this work of 24 propositions addressed to Dositheus, Archimedes proves by two methods that the area

enclosed by a parabola and a straight line is 4/3 multiplied by the area of a triangle with equal base and height.

He achieves this by calculating the value of a geometric series that sums to infinity with the ratio

1

4

.

(O)stomachion

This is a dissection puzzle similar to a Tangram, and the treatise describing it was found in more complete

form in the Archimedes Palimpsest. Archimedes calculates the areas of the 14 pieces which can be assembled

to form a square. Research published by Dr. Reviel Netz of Stanford University in 2003 argued that

Archimedes was attempting to determine how many ways the pieces could be assembled into the shape of a

square. Dr. Netz calculates that the pieces can be made into a square 17,152 ways.

[53]

The number of

arrangements is 536 when solutions that are equivalent by rotation and reflection have been excluded.

[54]

The

puzzle represents an example of an early problem in combinatorics.

The origin of the puzzle's name is unclear, and it has been suggested that it is taken from the Ancient Greek

word for throat or gullet, stomachos (-).

[55]

Ausonius refers to the puzzle as Ostomachion, a Greek

compound word formed from the roots of - (osteon, bone) and (mach fight). The puzzle is also

known as the Loculus of Archimedes or Archimedes' Box.

[56]

Archimedes' cattle problem

This work was discovered by Gotthold Ephraim Lessing in a Greek manuscript consisting of a poem of 44

lines, in the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbttel, Germany in 1773. It is addressed to Eratosthenes and the

mathematicians in Alexandria. Archimedes challenges them to count the numbers of cattle in the Herd of the

Sun by solving a number of simultaneous Diophantine equations. There is a more difficult version of the

problem in which some of the answers are required to be square numbers. This version of the problem was

first solved by A. Amthor

[57]

in 1880, and the answer is a very large number, approximately

7.76027110

206,544

.

[58]

The Sand Reckoner

In this treatise, Archimedes counts the number of grains of sand that will fit inside the universe. This book

mentions the heliocentric theory of the solar system proposed by Aristarchus of Samos, as well as

contemporary ideas about the size of the Earth and the distance between various celestial bodies. By using a

system of numbers based on powers of the myriad, Archimedes concludes that the number of grains of sand

required to fill the universe is 810

63

in modern notation. The introductory letter states that Archimedes' father

was an astronomer named Phidias. The Sand Reckoner or Psammites is the only surviving work in which

Archimedes discusses his views on astronomy.

[59]

The Method of Mechanical Theorems

This treatise was thought lost until the discovery of the Archimedes Palimpsest in 1906. In this work

Archimedes uses infinitesimals, and shows how breaking up a figure into an infinite number of infinitely small

parts can be used to determine its area or volume. Archimedes may have considered this method lacking in

formal rigor, so he also used the method of exhaustion to derive the results. As with The Cattle Problem, The

Method of Mechanical Theorems was written in the form of a letter to Eratosthenes in Alexandria.

Archimedes

27

Apocryphal works

Archimedes' Book of Lemmas or Liber Assumptorum is a treatise with fifteen propositions on the nature of circles.

The earliest known copy of the text is in Arabic. The scholars T. L. Heath and Marshall Clagett argued that it cannot

have been written by Archimedes in its current form, since it quotes Archimedes, suggesting modification by another

author. The Lemmas may be based on an earlier work by Archimedes that is now lost.

[60]

It has also been claimed that Heron's formula for calculating the area of a triangle from the length of its sides was

known to Archimedes.

[c]

However, the first reliable reference to the formula is given by Heron of Alexandria in the

1st century AD.

[61]

Archimedes Palimpsest

Stomachion is a dissection puzzle in the

Archimedes Palimpsest.

The foremost document containing the work of Archimedes is the

Archimedes Palimpsest. In 1906, the Danish professor Johan Ludvig

Heiberg visited Constantinople and examined a 174-page goatskin

parchment of prayers written in the 13th century AD. He discovered

that it was a palimpsest, a document with text that had been written

over an erased older work. Palimpsests were created by scraping the

ink from existing works and reusing them, which was a common

practice in the Middle Ages as vellum was expensive. The older works

in the palimpsest were identified by scholars as 10th century AD

copies of previously unknown treatises by Archimedes.

[62]

The

parchment spent hundreds of years in a monastery library in

Constantinople before being sold to a private collector in the 1920s. On

October 29, 1998 it was sold at auction to an anonymous buyer for $2

million at Christie's in New York.

[63]

The palimpsest holds seven

treatises, including the only surviving copy of On Floating Bodies in the original Greek. It is the only known source

of The Method of Mechanical Theorems, referred to by Suidas and thought to have been lost forever. Stomachion

was also discovered in the palimpsest, with a more complete analysis of the puzzle than had been found in previous

texts. The palimpsest is now stored at the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, Maryland, where it has been subjected

to a range of modern tests including the use of ultraviolet and x-ray light to read the overwritten text.

[64]

The treatises in the Archimedes Palimpsest are: On the Equilibrium of Planes, On Spirals, Measurement of a Circle,

On the Sphere and the Cylinder, On Floating Bodies, The Method of Mechanical Theorems and Stomachion.

Archimedes

28

Legacy

The Fields Medal carries a portrait of

Archimedes.

There is a crater on the Moon named Archimedes (29.7 N, 4.0 W)

in his honor, as well as a lunar mountain range, the Montes

Archimedes (25.3 N, 4.6 W).

[65]

The asteroid 3600 Archimedes is named after him.

[66]

The Fields Medal for outstanding achievement in mathematics

carries a portrait of Archimedes, along with a carving illustrating his

proof on the sphere and the cylinder. The inscription around the

head of Archimedes is a quote attributed to him which reads in

Latin: "Transire suum pectus mundoque potiri" (Rise above oneself

and grasp the world).

[67]

Archimedes has appeared on postage stamps issued by East

Germany (1973), Greece (1983), Italy (1983), Nicaragua (1971),

San Marino (1982), and Spain (1963).

[68]

The exclamation of Eureka! attributed to Archimedes is the state motto of California. In this instance the word

refers to the discovery of gold near Sutter's Mill in 1848 which sparked the California Gold Rush.

[69]

A movement for civic engagement targeting universal access to health care in the US state of Oregon has been

named the "Archimedes Movement," headed by former Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.

[70]

Notes and references

Notes

a. In the preface to On Spirals addressed to Dositheus of Pelusium, Archimedes says that "many years have elapsed

since Conon's death." Conon of Samos lived c. 280220 BC, suggesting that Archimedes may have been an older

man when writing some of his works.

b. The treatises by Archimedes known to exist only through references in the works of other authors are: On

Sphere-Making and a work on polyhedra mentioned by Pappus of Alexandria; Catoptrica, a work on optics

mentioned by Theon of Alexandria; Principles, addressed to Zeuxippus and explaining the number system used in

The Sand Reckoner; On Balances and Levers; On Centers of Gravity; On the Calendar. Of the surviving works by

Archimedes, T. L. Heath offers the following suggestion as to the order in which they were written: On the

Equilibrium of Planes I, The Quadrature of the Parabola, On the Equilibrium of Planes II, On the Sphere and the

Cylinder I, II, On Spirals, On Conoids and Spheroids, On Floating Bodies I, II, On the Measurement of a Circle, The

Sand Reckoner.

c. Boyer, Carl Benjamin A History of Mathematics (1991) ISBN 0-471-54397-7 "Arabic scholars inform us that the

familiar area formula for a triangle in terms of its three sides, usually known as Heron's formula

k=(s(sa)(sb)(sc)), where s is the semiperimeter was known to Archimedes several centuries before

Heron lived. Arabic scholars also attribute to Archimedes the 'theorem on the broken chord'... Archimedes is

reported by the Arabs to have given several proofs of the theorem."

d. "It was usual to smear the seams or even the whole hull with pitch or with pitch and wax". In

(Dialogues of the Dead), Lucian refers to coating the seams of a skiff with wax, a reference to pitch (tar) or wax.

[71]

Archimedes

29

References

[1] "Archimedes (c.287 - c.212 BC)" (http:/ / www. bbc.co. uk/ history/ historic_figures/ archimedes. shtml). BBC History. . Retrieved

2012-06-07.

[2] "Archimedes Death Ray: Testing with MythBusters" (http:/ / web. mit. edu/ 2. 009/ www/ / experiments/ deathray/ 10_Mythbusters. html).

MIT. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[3] Calinger, Ronald (1999). A Contextual History of Mathematics. Prentice-Hall. p.150. ISBN0-02-318285-7. "Shortly after Euclid, compiler

of the definitive textbook, came Archimedes of Syracuse (ca. 287212 BC), the most original and profound mathematician of antiquity."

[4] "Archimedes of Syracuse" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-and. ac. uk/ Biographies/ Archimedes. html). The MacTutor History of Mathematics

archive. January 1999. . Retrieved 2008-06-09.

[5] O'Connor, J.J. and Robertson, E.F. (February 1996). "A history of calculus" (http:/ / www-groups. dcs. st-and. ac. uk/ ~history/ HistTopics/

The_rise_of_calculus.html). University of St Andrews. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070715191704/ http:/ / www-groups. dcs.

st-and. ac. uk/ ~history/ HistTopics/ The_rise_of_calculus. html) from the original on 15 July 2007. . Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[6] Bursill-Hall, Piers. "Galileo, Archimedes, and Renaissance engineers" (http:/ / www. sciencelive. org/ component/ option,com_mediadb/

task,view/ idstr,CU-MMP-PiersBursillHall/ Itemid,30). sciencelive with the University of Cambridge. . Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[7] "Archimedes The Palimpsest" (http:/ / web.archive. org/ web/ 20070928102802/ http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/

palimpsest_making1. html). Walters Art Museum. Archived from the original (http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/ palimpsest_making1.

html) on 2007-09-28. . Retrieved 2007-10-14.

[8] Heath, T. L., Works of Archimedes, 1897

[9] Plutarch. "Parallel Lives Complete e-text from Gutenberg.org" (http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ etext/ 674). Project Gutenberg. Archived (http:/

/ web. archive. org/ web/ 20070711045124/ http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ etext/ 674) from the original on 11 July 2007. . Retrieved

2007-07-23.

[10] O'Connor, J.J. and Robertson, E.F.. "Archimedes of Syracuse" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/ Biographies/ Archimedes.

html). University of St Andrews. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070206082010/ http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Archimedes. html) from the original on 6 February 2007. . Retrieved 2007-01-02.

[11] Rorres, Chris. "Death of Archimedes: Sources" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Death/ Histories. html). Courant

Institute of Mathematical Sciences. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20061210060235/ http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/

Archimedes/ Death/ Histories. html) from the original on 10 December 2006. . Retrieved 2007-01-02.

[12] Rorres, Chris. "Tomb of Archimedes: Sources" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Tomb/ Cicero. html). Courant Institute

of Mathematical Sciences. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20061209201723/ http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/

Tomb/ Cicero.html) from the original on 9 December 2006. . Retrieved 2007-01-02.

[13] Rorres, Chris. "Tomb of Archimedes Illustrations" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Tomb/ TombIllus. html). Courant

Institute of Mathematical Sciences. . Retrieved 2011-03-15.

[14] Rorres, Chris. "Siege of Syracuse" (http:/ / www.math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Siege/ Polybius. html). Courant Institute of

Mathematical Sciences. Archived (http:/ / web.archive.org/ web/ 20070609013114/ http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/

Siege/ Polybius. html) from the original on 9 June 2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[15] Vitruvius. "De Architectura, Book IX, paragraphs 912, text in English and Latin" (http:/ / penelope. uchicago. edu/ Thayer/ E/ Roman/

Texts/ Vitruvius/ 9*.html). University of Chicago. . Retrieved 2007-08-30.

[16] "Incompressibility of Water" (http:/ / www.fas. harvard. edu/ ~scdiroff/ lds/ NewtonianMechanics/ IncompressibilityofWater/

IncompressibilityofWater. html). Harvard University. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20080317130651/ http:/ / www. fas. harvard.

edu/ ~scdiroff/ lds/ NewtonianMechanics/ IncompressibilityofWater/ IncompressibilityofWater. html) from the original on 17 March 2008. .

Retrieved 2008-02-27.

[17] HyperPhysics. "Buoyancy" (http:/ / hyperphysics. phy-astr. gsu. edu/ Hbase/ pbuoy. html). Georgia State University. Archived (http:/ / web.

archive. org/ web/ 20070714113647/ http:/ / hyperphysics. phy-astr. gsu. edu/ hbase/ pbuoy. html#c1) from the original on 14 July 2007. .

Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[18] Rorres, Chris. "The Golden Crown" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Crown/ CrownIntro. html). Drexel University.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20090311051318/ http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Crown/ CrownIntro. html)

from the original on 11 March 2009. . Retrieved 2009-03-24.

[19] Carroll, Bradley W. "Archimedes' Principle" (http:/ / www. physics. weber. edu/ carroll/ Archimedes/ principle. htm). Weber State

University. Archived (http:/ / web.archive.org/ web/ 20070808132323/ http:/ / physics. weber. edu/ carroll/ Archimedes/ principle. htm) from

the original on 8 August 2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[20] Rorres, Chris. "The Golden Crown: Galileo's Balance" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Crown/ bilancetta. html).

Drexel University. Archived (http:/ / web. archive.org/ web/ 20090224221137/ http:/ / math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Crown/

bilancetta.html) from the original on 24 February 2009. . Retrieved 2009-03-24.

[21] Casson, Lionel (1971). Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World. Princeton University Press. ISBN0-691-03536-9.

[22] Dalley, Stephanie. Oleson, John Peter. "Sennacherib, Archimedes, and the Water Screw: The Context of Invention in the Ancient World"

(http:/ / muse. jhu. edu/ journals/ technology_and_culture/ toc/ tech44. 1. html). Technology and Culture Volume 44, Number 1, January 2003

(PDF). . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[23] Rorres, Chris. "Archimedes screw Optimal Design" (http:/ / www. cs. drexel. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Screw/ optimal/ optimal. html).

Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

Archimedes

30

[24] [24] An animation of an Archimedes screw

[25] "SS Archimedes" (http:/ / www. wrecksite.eu/ wreck. aspx?636). wrecksite.eu. . Retrieved 2011-01-22.

[26] Rorres, Chris. "Archimedes' Claw Illustrations and Animations a range of possible designs for the claw" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/

~crorres/ Archimedes/ Claw/ illustrations. html). Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[27] Carroll, Bradley W. "Archimedes' Claw watch an animation" (http:/ / physics. weber. edu/ carroll/ Archimedes/ claw. htm). Weber State

University. Archived (http:/ / web.archive.org/ web/ 20070813202716/ http:/ / physics. weber. edu/ carroll/ Archimedes/ claw. htm) from the

original on 13 August 2007. . Retrieved 2007-08-12.

[28] Hippias, 2 (cf. Galen, On temperaments 3.2, who mentions pyreia, "torches"); Anthemius of Tralles, On miraculous engines 153

[Westerman].

[29] John Wesley. "A Compendium of Natural Philosophy (1810) Chapter XII, Burning Glasses" (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/

20071012154432/ http:/ / wesley.nnu. edu/ john_wesley/ wesley_natural_philosophy/ duten12. htm). Online text at Wesley Center for

Applied Theology. Archived from the original (http:/ / wesley. nnu. edu/ john_wesley/ wesley_natural_philosophy/ duten12. htm) on

2007-10-12. . Retrieved 2007-09-14.

[30] "Archimedes' Weapon" (http:/ / www. time.com/ time/ magazine/ article/ 0,9171,908175,00. html?promoid=googlep). Time Magazine.

November 26, 1973. . Retrieved 2007-08-12.

[31] Bonsor, Kevin. "How Wildfires Work" (http:/ / science. howstuffworks. com/ wildfire. htm). HowStuffWorks. Archived (http:/ / web.

archive. org/ web/ 20070714174036/ http:/ / science. howstuffworks. com/ wildfire. htm) from the original on 14 July 2007. . Retrieved

2007-07-23.

[32] Fuels and Chemicals Auto Ignition Temperatures (http:/ / www. engineeringtoolbox. com/ fuels-ignition-temperatures-d_171. html)

[33] "TV Review: MythBusters 8.27 President's Challenge" (http:/ / fandomania. com/ tv-review-mythbusters-8-27-presidents-challenge/ ). .

Retrieved 2010-12-18.

[34] Rorres, Chris. "The Law of the Lever According to Archimedes" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Lever/ LeverLaw.

html). Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. . Retrieved 2010-03-20.

[35] Clagett, Marshall (2001). Greek Science in Antiquity (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=mweWMAlf-tEC& pg=PA72& lpg=PA72&

dq=archytas+ lever& q=archytas lever). Dover Publications. ISBN978-0-486-41973-2. . Retrieved 2010-03-20.

[36] Quoted by Pappus of Alexandria in Synagoge, Book VIII

[37] Dougherty, F. C.; Macari, J.; Okamoto, C.. "Pulleys" (http:/ / www. swe. org/ iac/ lp/ pulley_03. html). Society of Women Engineers.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070718031943/ http:/ / www. swe. org/ iac/ LP/ pulley_03. html) from the original on 18 July

2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[38] "Ancient Greek Scientists: Hero of Alexandria" (http:/ / www. tmth. edu. gr/ en/ aet/ 5/ 55. html). Technology Museum of Thessaloniki.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070905125400/ http:/ / www. tmth. edu. gr/ en/ aet/ 5/ 55. html) from the original on 5 September

2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-14.

[39] Cicero. "De re publica 1.xiv 21" (http:/ / www.thelatinlibrary. com/ cicero/ repub1. shtml#21). thelatinlibrary.com. . Retrieved

2007-07-23.

[40] Cicero. "De re publica Complete e-text in English from Gutenberg.org" (http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ etext/ 14988). Project Gutenberg.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070929122153/ http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ etext/ 14988) from the original on 29 September

2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-18.

[41] Rorres, Chris. "Spheres and Planetaria" (http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Sphere/ SphereIntro. html). Courant Institute

of Mathematical Sciences. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[42] "Ancient Moon 'computer' revisited" (http:/ / news.bbc. co. uk/ 1/ hi/ sci/ tech/ 6191462. stm). BBC News. November 29, 2006. . Retrieved

2007-07-23.

[43] Plutarch. "Extract from Parallel Lives" (http:/ / fulltextarchive. com/ pages/ Plutarch-s-Lives10. php#p35). fulltextarchive.com. . Retrieved

2009-08-10.

[44] Heath, T.L.. "Archimedes on measuring the circle" (http:/ / www. math. ubc. ca/ ~cass/ archimedes/ circle. html). math.ubc.ca. . Retrieved

2012-10-30.

[45] Kaye, R.W.. "Archimedean ordered fields" (http:/ / web. mat. bham. ac. uk/ R. W. Kaye/ seqser/ archfields). web.mat.bham.ac.uk. .

Retrieved 2009-11-07.

[46] Quoted in Heath, T. L. Works of Archimedes, Dover Publications, ISBN 0-486-42084-1.

[47] McKeeman, Bill. "The Computation of Pi by Archimedes" (http:/ / www. mathworks. com/ matlabcentral/ fileexchange/

29504-the-computation-of-pi-by-archimedes/ content/ html/ ComputationOfPiByArchimedes. html#37). Matlab Central. . Retrieved

2012-10-30.

[48] Carroll, Bradley W. "The Sand Reckoner" (http:/ / physics. weber. edu/ carroll/ Archimedes/ sand. htm). Weber State University. Archived

(http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070813215029/ http:/ / physics. weber. edu/ carroll/ Archimedes/ sand. htm) from the original on 13 August

2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[49] Encyclopedia of ancient Greece By Wilson, Nigel Guy p. 77 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=-aFtPdh6-2QC& pg=PA77) ISBN

0-7945-0225-3 (2006)

[50] "Editions of Archimedes' Work" (http:/ / www.brown. edu/ Facilities/ University_Library/ exhibits/ math/ wholefr. html). Brown University

Library. Archived (http:/ / web. archive.org/ web/ 20070808235638/ http:/ / www. brown. edu/ Facilities/ University_Library/ exhibits/ math/

wholefr.html) from the original on 8 August 2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

Archimedes

31

[51] Van Helden, Al. "The Galileo Project: Hydrostatic Balance" (http:/ / galileo. rice. edu/ sci/ instruments/ balance. html). Rice University.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070905185039/ http:/ / galileo. rice. edu/ sci/ instruments/ balance. html) from the original on 5

September 2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-14.

[52] Heath, T.L.. "The Works of Archimedes (1897). The unabridged work in PDF form (19MB)" (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

worksofarchimede029517mbp). Archive.org. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20071006033058/ http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

worksofarchimede029517mbp) from the original on 6 October 2007. . Retrieved 2007-10-14.

[53] Kolata, Gina (December 14, 2003). "In Archimedes' Puzzle, a New Eureka Moment" (http:/ / query. nytimes. com/ gst/ fullpage.

html?res=9D00E6DD133CF937A25751C1A9659C8B63& sec=& spon=& pagewanted=all). The New York Times. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[54] Ed Pegg Jr. (November 17, 2003). "The Loculus of Archimedes, Solved" (http:/ / www. maa. org/ editorial/ mathgames/

mathgames_11_17_03. html). Mathematical Association of America. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20080519094951/ http:/ /

www.maa.org/ editorial/ mathgames/ mathgames_11_17_03. html) from the original on 19 May 2008. . Retrieved 2008-05-18.

[55] Rorres, Chris. "Archimedes' Stomachion" (http:/ / math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Stomachion/ intro. html). Courant Institute of

Mathematical Sciences. Archived (http:/ / web.archive.org/ web/ 20071026005336/ http:/ / www. math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/

Stomachion/ intro.html) from the original on 26 October 2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-14.

[56] "Graeco Roman Puzzles" (http:/ / www.archimedes-lab. org/ latin. html#archimede). Gianni A. Sarcone and Marie J. Waeber. Archived

(http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20080514130547/ http:/ / www. archimedes-lab. org/ latin. html) from the original on 14 May 2008. .

Retrieved 2008-05-09.

[57] Krumbiegel, B. and Amthor, A. Das Problema Bovinum des Archimedes, Historisch-literarische Abteilung der Zeitschrift Fr Mathematik

und Physik 25 (1880) pp. 121136, 153171.

[58] Calkins, Keith G. "Archimedes' Problema Bovinum" (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20071012171254/ http:/ / andrews. edu/ ~calkins/

profess/ cattle. htm). Andrews University. Archived from the original (http:/ / www. andrews. edu/ ~calkins/ profess/ cattle. htm) on

2007-10-12. . Retrieved 2007-09-14.

[59] "English translation of The Sand Reckoner" (http:/ / www. math. uwaterloo. ca/ navigation/ ideas/ reckoner. shtml). University of Waterloo.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070811235335/ http:/ / www. math. uwaterloo. ca/ navigation/ ideas/ reckoner. shtml) from the

original on 11 August 2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[60] "Archimedes' Book of Lemmas" (http:/ / www. cut-the-knot. org/ Curriculum/ Geometry/ BookOfLemmas/ index. shtml). cut-the-knot.

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070711111858/ http:/ / www. cut-the-knot. org/ Curriculum/ Geometry/ BookOfLemmas/ index.

shtml) from the original on 11 July 2007. . Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[61] O'Connor, J.J. and Robertson, E.F. (April 1999). "Heron of Alexandria" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-and. ac. uk/ Biographies/ Heron.

html). University of St Andrews. . Retrieved 2010-02-17.

[62] Miller, Mary K. (March 2007). "Reading Between the Lines" (http:/ / www. smithsonianmag. com/ science-nature/ archimedes. html).

Smithsonian Magazine. Archived (http:/ / web. archive.org/ web/ 20080119024939/ http:/ / www. smithsonianmag. com/ science-nature/

archimedes. html?) from the original on 19 January 2008. . Retrieved 2008-01-24.

[63] "Rare work by Archimedes sells for $2 million" (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20080516000109/ http:/ / edition. cnn. com/ books/ news/

9810/ 29/ archimedes/ ). CNN. October 29, 1998. Archived from the original (http:/ / edition. cnn. com/ books/ news/ 9810/ 29/ archimedes/ )

on May 16, 2008. . Retrieved 2008-01-15.

[64] "X-rays reveal Archimedes' secrets" (http:/ / news.bbc. co. uk/ 1/ hi/ sci/ tech/ 5235894. stm). BBC News. August 2, 2006. Archived (http:/ /

web. archive. org/ web/ 20070825091847/ http:/ / news.bbc. co. uk/ 1/ hi/ sci/ tech/ 5235894. stm) from the original on 25 August 2007. .

Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[65] Friedlander, Jay and Williams, Dave. "Oblique view of Archimedes crater on the Moon" (http:/ / nssdc. gsfc. nasa. gov/ imgcat/ html/

object_page/ a15_m_1541.html). NASA. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070819054033/ http:/ / nssdc. gsfc. nasa. gov/ imgcat/

html/ object_page/ a15_m_1541.html) from the original on 19 August 2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-13.

[66] "Planetary Data System" (http:/ / starbrite. jpl.nasa.gov/ pds-explorer/ index. jsp?selection=othertarget& targname=3600 ARCHIMEDES).

NASA. Archived (http:/ / web.archive.org/ web/ 20071012171730/ http:/ / starbrite. jpl. nasa. gov/ pds-explorer/ index.

jsp?selection=othertarget& targname=3600+ ARCHIMEDES) from the original on 12 October 2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-13.

[67] "Fields Medal" (http:/ / web.archive. org/ web/ 20070701033751/ http:/ / www. mathunion. org/ medals/ Fields/ AboutPhotos. html).

International Mathematical Union. Archived from the original (http:/ / www. mathunion. org/ medals/ Fields/ AboutPhotos. html) on July 1,

2007. . Retrieved 2007-07-23.

[68] Rorres, Chris. "Stamps of Archimedes" (http:/ / math. nyu. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Stamps/ stamps. html). Courant Institute of

Mathematical Sciences. . Retrieved 2007-08-25.

[69] "California Symbols" (http:/ / www. capitolmuseum. ca. gov/ VirtualTour. aspx?content1=1278& Content2=1374& Content3=1294).

California State Capitol Museum. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20071012123245/ http:/ / capitolmuseum. ca. gov/ VirtualTour.

aspx?content1=1278& Content2=1374& Content3=1294) from the original on 12 October 2007. . Retrieved 2007-09-14.

[70] "The Archimedes Movement" (http:/ / www.archimedesmovement. org/ ). .

[71] Casson, Lionel (1995). Ships and seamanship in the ancient world (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=sDpMh0gK2OUC& pg=PA18&

dq=why+ were+ homer's+ ships+ black#v=onepage& q=why were homer's ships black& f=false). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University

Press. pp.211212. ISBN978-0-8018-5130-8. .

Archimedes

32

Further reading

Boyer, Carl Benjamin (1991). A History of Mathematics. New York: Wiley. ISBN0-471-54397-7.

Clagett, Marshall (1964-1984). Archimedes in the Middle Ages. 5 vols. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin

Press.

Dijksterhuis, E.J. (1987). Archimedes. Princeton University Press, Princeton. ISBN0-691-08421-1. Republished

translation of the 1938 study of Archimedes and his works by an historian of science.

Gow, Mary (2005). Archimedes: Mathematical Genius of the Ancient World. Enslow Publishers, Inc.

ISBN0-7660-2502-0.

Hasan, Heather (2005). Archimedes: The Father of Mathematics. Rosen Central. ISBN978-1-4042-0774-5.

Heath, T.L. (1897). Works of Archimedes. Dover Publications. ISBN0-486-42084-1. Complete works of

Archimedes in English.

Netz, Reviel and Noel, William (2007). The Archimedes Codex. Orion Publishing Group. ISBN0-297-64547-1.

Pickover, Clifford A. (2008). Archimedes to Hawking: Laws of Science and the Great Minds Behind Them.

Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-533611-5.

Simms, Dennis L. (1995). Archimedes the Engineer. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.

ISBN0-7201-2284-8.

Stein, Sherman (1999). Archimedes: What Did He Do Besides Cry Eureka?. Mathematical Association of

America. ISBN0-88385-718-9.

The Works of Archimedes online

Text in Classical Greek: PDF scans of Heiberg's edition of the Works of Archimedes, now in the public domain

(http:/ / www. wilbourhall. org)

In English translation: The Works of Archimedes (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

worksofarchimede029517mbp), trans. T.L. Heath; supplemented by The Method of Mechanical Theorems (http:/ /

books. google. com/ books?id=suYGAAAAYAAJ), trans. L.G. Robinson

External links

Archimedes (http:/ / www. bbc. co. uk/ programmes/ b00773bv) on In Our Time at the BBC. ( listen now (http:/ /

www. bbc. co. uk/ iplayer/ console/ b00773bv/ In_Our_Time_Archimedes))

Archimedes (https:/ / inpho. cogs. indiana. edu/ thinker/ 2546) at the Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project

Archimedes (http:/ / philpapers. org/ s/ archimedes) at PhilPapers

The Archimedes Palimpsest project at The Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, Maryland (http:/ / www.

archimedespalimpsest. org/ )

The Mathematical Achievements and Methodologies of Archimedes (http:/ / mathdb. org/ articles/ archimedes/

e_archimedes. htm)

"Archimedes and the Square Root of 3" (http:/ / www. mathpages. com/ home/ kmath038/ kmath038. htm) at

MathPages.com.

"Archimedes on Spheres and Cylinders" (http:/ / www. mathpages. com/ home/ kmath343/ kmath343. htm) at

MathPages.com.

Photograph of the Sakkas experiment in 1973 (http:/ / www. cs. drexel. edu/ ~crorres/ bbc_archive/

mirrors_sailors_sakas. jpg)

Testing the Archimedes steam cannon (http:/ / web. mit. edu/ 2. 009/ www/ experiments/ steamCannon/

ArchimedesSteamCannon. html)

Stamps of Archimedes (http:/ / www. stampsbook. org/ subject/ Archimedes. html)

Eureka! 1,000-year-old text by Greek maths genius Archimedes goes on display (http:/ / www. dailymail. co. uk/

sciencetech/ article-2050631/ Eureka-1-000-year-old-text-Greek-maths-genius-Archimedes-goes-display. html)

Archimedes

33

Daily Mail, October 18, 2011.

Archimedes' cattle problem

Archimedes' cattle problem (or the problema bovinum or problema Archimedis) is a problem in Diophantine

analysis, the study of polynomial equations with integer solutions. Attributed to Archimedes, the problem involves

computing the number of cattle in a herd of the sun god from a given set of restrictions. The problem was discovered

by Gotthold Ephraim Lessing in a Greek manuscript containing a poem of forty-four lines, in the Herzog August

Library in Wolfenbttel, Germany in 1773.

The problem remained unsolved for a number of years, due partly to the difficulty of computing the huge numbers

involved in the solution. The general solution was found in 1880 by A. Amthor. He gave the exact solution using

exponentials and showed that it was about cattle, far more than could fit in the observable

universe. The decimal form is too long for humans to calculate exactly, but multiple precision arithmetic packages

on computers can easily write it out explicitly.

History

In 1769, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing was appointed librarian of the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbttel,

Germany, which contained many Greek and Latin manuscripts.

[1]

A few years later, Lessing published translations

of some of the manuscripts with commentaries. Among them was a Greek poem of forty-four lines, containing an

arithmetical problem which asks the reader to find the number of cattle in the herd of the god of the sun. The name

of Archimedes appears in the title of the poem, it being said that he sent it in a letter to Eratosthenes to be

investigated by the mathematicians of Alexandria. The claim that Archimedes authored the poem is disputed,

though, as no mention of the problem has been found in the writings of the Greek mathematicians.

[2]

Problem

The problem, from an abridgement of the German translations published by Georg Nesselmann in 1842, and by

Krumbiegel in 1880, states:

Compute, O friend, the number of the cattle of the sun which once grazed upon the plains of Sicily, divided

according to color into four herds, one milk-white, one black, one dappled and one yellow. The number of

bulls is greater than the number of cows, and the relations between them are as follows:

White bulls black bulls + yellow bulls,

Black bulls dappled bulls + yellow bulls,

Dappled bulls white bulls + yellow bulls,

White cows black herd,

Black cows dappled herd,

Dappled cows yellow herd,

Yellow cows white herd.

Archimedes' cattle problem

34

If thou canst give, O friend, the number of each kind of bulls and cows, thou art no novice in numbers, yet can

not be regarded as of high skill. Consider, however, the following additional relations between the bulls of the

sun:

White bulls + black bulls = a square number,

Dappled bulls + yellow bulls = a triangular number.

If thou hast computed these also, O friend, and found the total number of cattle, then exult as a conqueror, for

thou hast proved thyself most skilled in numbers.

[2]

Solution

The first part of the problem can be solved readily by setting up a system of equations. If the number of white, black,

dappled, and yellow bulls are written as and , and the number of white, black, dappled, and yellow

cows are written as and , the problem is simply to find a solution to:

which is a system of seven equations with eight unknowns. It is indeterminate, and has infinitely many solutions.

The least positive integers satisfying the seven equations are:

which is a total of 50,389,082 cattle

[2]

and the other solutions are integral multiples of these. Note that the first four

numbers are multiples of 4657, a value which will appear repeatedly below.

The general solution to the second part of the problem was first found by A. Amthor

[3]

in 1880. The following

version of it was described by H. W. Lenstra,

[4]

based on Pell's equation: the solution given above for the first part of

the problem should be multiplied by

where

Archimedes' cattle problem

35

and j is any positive integer. Equivalently, squaring w results in,

where {u,v} are the fundamental solutions of the Pell equation,

The size of the smallest herd that could satisfy both the first and second parts of the problem is then given by j = 1,

and is about (first solved by Amthor). Modern computers can easily print out all digits of the

answer. This was first done at the University of Waterloo, in 1965 by Hugh C. Williams, R. A. German, and Charles

Robert Zarnke. They used a combination of the IBM 7040 and IBM 1620 computers.

[5]

Pell Equation

The constraints of the second part of the problem are straightforward and the actual Pell equation that needs to be

solved can easily be given. First, it asks that B+W should be a square, or using the values given above,

thus one should set k = (3)(11)(29)(4657)q

2

for some integer q. That solves the first condition. For the second, it

requires that D+Y should be a triangular number,

Solving for t,

Substituting the value of D+Y and k and finding a value of q

2

such that the discriminant of this quadratic is a perfect

square p

2

entails solving the Pell equation,

Amthor's approach discussed in the previous section was essentially to find the smallest v such that it is integrally

divisible by 2*4657. The fundamental solution of this equation has more than 100,000 digits.

References

[1] Rorres, Chris. "Archimedes' Cattle Problem (Statement)" (http:/ / www. mcs. drexel. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Cattle/ Statement. html).

Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070124203443/ http:/ / www. mcs. drexel. edu/ ~crorres/ Archimedes/ Cattle/ Statement. html)

from the original on 24 January 2007. . Retrieved 2007-01-24.

[2] Merriman, Mansfield (1905). "The Cattle Problem of Archimedes". Popular Science Monthly 67: 660665.

[3] B. Krumbiegel, A. Amthor, Das Problema Bovinum des Archimedes, Historisch-literarische Abteilung der Zeitschrift Fr Mathematik und

Physik 25 (1880) 121-136, 153-171.

[4] Lenstra, H. W. (2002). "Solving the Pell equation" (http:/ / www. ams. org/ notices/ 200202/ fea-lenstra. pdf) (PDF). Notices of the American

Mathematical Society 29 (2): 182192. .

[5] Harold Alkema and Kenneth McLaughlin (2007). "Unbundling Computing at The University of Waterloo" (http:/ / www. cs. uwaterloo. ca/

40th/ Chronology/ printable. shtml). University of Waterloo. Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20110404172741/ http:/ / www. cs.

uwaterloo.ca/ 40th/ Chronology/ printable.shtml) from the original on 4 April 2011. . Retrieved April 5, 2011. (includes pictures)

Archimedes' cattle problem

36

Further reading

Drrie, Heinrich (1965). "Archimedes' Problema Bovinum". 100 Great Problems of Elementary Mathematics.

Dover Publications. pp.37.

Williams, H. C.; German, R. A.; and Zarnke, C. R. (1965). "Solution of the Cattle Problem of Archimedes".

Mathematics of Computation (American Mathematical Society) 19 (92): pp. 671674. doi:10.2307/2003954.

JSTOR2003954.

Vardi, I. (1998). "Archimedes' Cattle Problem". American Mathematical Monthly (Mathematical Association of

America) 105 (4): pp. 305319. doi:10.2307/2589706.

Book of Lemmas

The first page of the Book of Lemmas as seen in

The Works of Archimedes (1897).

The Book of Lemmas is a book attributed to Archimedes by Thbit ibn

Qurra, though the authorship of the book is questionable. It consists of

fifteen propositions on circles.

[1]

History

Translations

The Book of Lemmas was first introduced in Arabic by Thbit ibn

Qurra; he attributed the work to Archimedes. In 1661, the Arabic

manuscript was translated into Latin by Abraham Ecchellensis and

edited by Giovanni A. Borelli. The Latin version was published under

the name Liber Assumptorum.

[2]

T. L. Heath translated Heiburg's Latin

work into English in his The Works of Archimedes.

[3][4]

Authorship

The original authorship of the Book of Lemmas has been in question because in proposition four, the book refers to

Archimedes in third person; however, it has been suggested that it may have been added by the translator.

[5]

Another

possibility is that the Book of Lemmas may be a collection of propositions by Archimedes later collected by a Greek

writer.

[1]

New geometrical figures

The Book of Lemmas introduces several new geometrical figures.

Book of Lemmas

37

Arbelos

The arbelos is the shaded region (grey).

Archimedes' first introduced the arbelos in proposition four of his

book:

If AB be the diameter of a semicircle and N any point on AB, and if semicircles be described within the first semicircle and having AN, BN as

diameters respectively, the figure included between the circumferences of the three semicircles is "what Archimedes called "; and its

area is equal to the circle on PN as diameter, where PN is perpendicular to AB and meets the original semicircle in P.

[1]

The figure is used in propositions four through eight. In propositions five, Archimedes introduces the Archimedes'

twin circles, and in proposition eight, he makes use what would be the Pappus chain, formally introduced by Pappus

of Alexandria.

Salinon

The salinon is the blue shaded region.

Archimedes' first introduced the salinon in proposition fourteen of

his book:

Let ACB be a semicircle on AB as diameter, and let AD, BE be equal lengths measured along AB from A, B respectively. On AD, BE as

diameters describe semicircles on the side towards C, and on DE as diameter a semicircle on the opposite side. Let the perpendicular to AB

through O, the centre of the first semicircle, meet the opposite semicircles in C, F respectively. Then shall the area of the figure bounded by

the circumferences of all the semicircles be equal to the area of the circle on CF as diameter.

[1]

Archimedes proved that the salinon and the circle are equal in area.

Book of Lemmas

38

Propositions

1. 1. If two circles touch at A, and if CD, EF be parallel diameters in them, ADF is a straight line.

2. 2. Let AB be the diameter of a semicircle, and let the tangents to it at B and at any other point D on it meet in T. If

now DE be drawn perpendicular to AB, and if AT, DE meet in F, then DF=FE.

3. 3. Let P be any point on a segment of a circle whose base is AB, and let PN be perpendicular to AB. Take D on AB

so that AN=ND. If now PQ be an arc equal to the arc PA, and BQ be joined, then BQ, BD shall be equal.

4. 4. If AB be the diameter of a semicircle and N any point on AB, and if semicircles be described within the first

semicircle and having AN, BN as diameters respectively, the figure included between the circumferences of the

three semicircles is "what Archimedes called "; and its area is equal to the circle on PN as diameter,

where PN is perpendicular to AB and meets the original semicircle in P.

5. 5. Let AB be the diameter of a semicircle, C any point on AB, and CD perpendicular to it, and let semicircles be

described within the first semicircle and having AC, CB as diameters. Then if two circles be drawn touching CD

on different sides and each touching two of the semicircles, the circles so drawn will be equal.

6. 6. Let AB, the diameter of a semicircle, be divided at C so that AC=3/2CB [or in any ratio]. Describe

semicircles within the first semicircle and on AC, CB as diameters, and suppose a circle drawn touching the all

three semicircles. If GH be the diameter of this circle, to find relation between GH and AB.

7. 7. If circles are circumscribed about and inscribed in a square, the circumscribed circle is double of the inscribed

square.

8. 8. If AB be any chord of a circle whose centre is O, and if AB be produced to C so that BC is equal to the radius; if

further CO meets the circle in D and be produced to meet the circle the second time in E, the arc AE will be equal

to three times the arc BD.

9. 9. If in a circle two chords AB, CD which do not pass through the centre intersect at right angles, then (arc

AD)+(arc CB)=(arc AC)+(arc DB).

10. 10. Suppose that TA, TB are two tangents to a circle, while TC cuts it. Let BD be the chord through B parallel to

TC, and let AD meet TC in E. Then, if EH be drawn perpendicular to BD, it will bisect it in H.

11. If two chords AB, CD in a circle intersect at right angles in a point O, not being the centre, then AO

2

+ BO

2

+

CO

2

+ DO

2

= (diameter)

2

.

12. 12. If AB be the diameter of a semicircle, and TP, TQ the tangents to it from any point T, and if AQ, BP be joined

meeting in R, then TR is perpendicular to AB.

13. 13. If a diameter AB of a circle meet any chord CD, not a diameter, in E, and if AM, BN be drawn perpendicular to

CD, then CN=DM.

14. 14. Let ACB be a semicircle on AB as diameter, and let AD, BE be equal lengths measured along AB from A, B

respectively. On AD, BE as diameters describe semicircles on the side towards C, and on DE as diameter a

semicircle on the opposite side. Let the perpendicular to AB through O, the centre of the first semicircle, meet the

opposite semicircles in C, F respectively. Then shall the area of the figure bounded by the circumferences of all

the semicircles be equal to the area of the circle on CF as diameter.

15. Let AB be the diameter of a circle., AC a side of an inscribed regular pentagon, D the middle point of the arc

AC. Join CD and produce it to meet BA produced in E; join AC, DB meeting in F, and Draw FM perpendicular to

AB. Then EM=(radius of circle).

[1]

Book of Lemmas

39

References

[1] Heath, Thomas Little (1897), The Works of Archimedes (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=bTEPAAAAIAAJ& printsec=titlepage), Cambridge

University: University Press, pp.xxxii, 301318, , retrieved 2008-06-15

[2] "From Euclid to Newton" (http:/ / www. brown.edu/ Facilities/ University_Library/ exhibits/ math/ nofr. html). Brown University. .

Retrieved 2008-06-24.

[3] Aaboe, Asger (1997), Episodes from the Early History of Mathematics (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=5wGzF0wPFYgC&

printsec=frontcover), Washington, D.C.: Math. Assoc. of America, pp.77, 85, ISBN0-88385-613-1, , retrieved 2008-06-19

[4] Glick, Thomas F.; Livesey, Steven John; Wallis, Faith (2005), Medieval Science, Technology, and Medicine: An Encyclopedia (http:/ / books.

google.com/ ?id=SaJlbWK_-FcC& printsec=frontcover#PPT9,M1), New York: Routledge, p.41, ISBN0-415-96930-1, , retrieved

2008-06-19

[5] Bogomolny, A. "Archimedes' Book of Lemmas" (http:/ / www. cut-the-knot. org/ Curriculum/ Geometry/ BookOfLemmas/ index. shtml).

Cut-the-Knot. . Retrieved 2008-06-19.

Archimedes Palimpsest

Ostomachion is a dissection puzzle in the

Archimedes Palimpsest (shown after Suter from a

different source; this version must be stretched to

twice the width to conform to the Palimpsest)

The Archimedes Palimpsest is a palimpsest (ancient overwritten

manuscript) on parchment in the form of a codex (hand-written bound

book, as opposed to a scroll). It originally was a 10th-century

Byzantine copy of an otherwise unknown work of the ancient

mathematician, physicist, and engineer Archimedes (c. 287 BCc. 212

BC) of Syracuse and other authors, which was overwritten with a

religious text. The manuscript currently belongs to an American

private collector.

Overview

Archimedes lived in the 3rd century BC, and a copy of his work was

made around 950 AD in the Byzantine Empire by an anonymous

scribe.

[1]

In 1229 the original Archimedes codex was unbound, scraped

and washed, along with at least six other parchment manuscripts,

including one with works of Hypereides. The parchment leaves were

folded in half and reused for a Christian liturgical text of 177 pages; the older leaves folded so that each became two

leaves of the liturgical book. The erasure was incomplete, and Archimedes' work is now readable after scientific and

scholarly work from 1998 to 2008 using digital processing of images produced by ultraviolet, infrared, visible and

raking light, and X-ray.

[2][3]

In 1906 it was briefly inspected in Istanbul by the Danish philologist Johan Ludvig Heiberg. With the aid of

black-and-white photographs he arranged to have taken, he published a transcription of the Archimedes text. Shortly

thereafter Archimedes' Greek text was translated into English by T. L. Heath. Before that it was not widely known

among mathematicians, physicists or historians. It contains:

"On the Equilibrium of Planes"

"Spiral Lines"

"Measurement of a Circle"

"On the Sphere and Cylinder"

"On Floating Bodies" (only known copy in Greek)

"The Method of Mechanical Theorems" (only known copy)

"Stomachion" (only known copy).

Archimedes Palimpsest

40

The palimpsest also contains speeches by the 4th century BC politician Hypereides, a commentary on Aristotle's

Categories by Alexander of Aphrodisias, and other works.

[4]

Mathematical content

A typical page from the Archimedes Palimpsest. The text of the

prayer book is seen from top to bottom, the original Archimedes

manuscript is seen as fainter text below it running from left to

right

The most remarkable of the above works is The Method,

of which the palimpsest contains the only known copy.

In his other works, Archimedes often proves the equality

of two areas or volumes with Eudoxus' method of

exhaustion, an ancient Greek counterpart of the modern

method of limits. Since the Greeks were aware that some

numbers were irrational, their notion of a real number was

a quantity Q approximated by two sequences, one

providing an upper bound and the other a lower bound. If

you find two sequences U and L, with U always bigger

than Q, and L always smaller than Q, and if the two

sequences eventually came closer together than any

prespecified amount, then Q is found, or exhausted, by U

and L.

Archimedes used exhaustion to prove his theorems. This

involved approximating the figure whose area he wanted

to compute into sections of known area, which provide

upper and lower bounds for the area of the figure. He then

proved that the two bounds become equal when the

subdivision becomes arbitrarily fine. These proofs, still

considered to be rigorous and correct, used geometry with

rare brilliance. Later writers often criticized Archimedes

for not explaining how he arrived at his results in the first

place. This explanation is contained in The Method.

The method that Archimedes describes was based upon

his investigations of physics, on the center of mass and the

law of the lever. He compared the area or volume of a figure of which he knew the total mass and center of mass

with the area or volume of another figure he did not know anything about. He divided both figures into infinitely

many slices of infinitesimal width, and balanced each slice of one figure against a corresponding slice of the second

figure on a lever. The essential point is that the two figures are oriented differently, so that the corresponding slices

are at different distances from the fulcrum, and the condition that the slices balance is not the same as the condition

that they are equal.

Archimedes Palimpsest

41

After imaging a page from the palimpsest, the original Archimedes

text is now seen clearly

Once he shows that each slice of one figure balances

each slice of the other figure, he concludes that the two

figures balance each other. But the center of mass of one

figure is known, and the total mass can be placed at this

center and it still balances. The second figure has an

unknown mass, but the position of its center of mass

might be restricted to lie at a certain distance from the

fulcrum by a geometrical argument, by symmetry. The

condition that the two figures balance now allows him to

calculate the total mass of the other figure. He

considered this method as a useful heuristic but always

made sure to prove the results he found using exhaustion,

since the method did not provide upper and lower

bounds.

Using this method, Archimedes was able to solve several

problems now treated by integral calculus, which was

given its modern form in the seventeenth century by

Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz. Among those

problems were that of calculating the center of gravity of

a solid hemisphere, the center of gravity of a frustum of a

circular paraboloid, and the area of a region bounded by

a parabola and one of its secant lines. (For explicit

details, see Archimedes' use of infinitesimals.)

When rigorously proving theorems, Archimedes often used what are now called Riemann sums. In "On the Sphere

and Cylinder," he gives upper and lower bounds for the surface area of a sphere by cutting the sphere into sections of

equal width. He then bounds the area of each section by the area of an inscribed and circumscribed cone, which he

proves have a larger and smaller area correspondingly. He adds the areas of the cones, which is a type of Riemann

sum for the area of the sphere considered as a surface of revolution.

But there are two essential differences between Archimedes' method and 19th-century methods:

1. 1. Archimedes did not know about differentiation, so he could not calculate any integrals other than those that came

from center-of-mass considerations, by symmetry. While he had a notion of linearity, to find the volume of a

sphere he had to balance two figures at the same time; he never figured out how to change variables or integrate

by parts.

2. 2. When calculating approximating sums, he imposed the further constraint that the sums provide rigorous upper

and lower bounds. This was required because the Greeks lacked algebraic methods that could establish that error

terms in an approximation are small.

A problem solved exclusively in the Method is the calculation of the volume of a cylindrical wedge, a result that

reappears as theorem XVII (schema XIX) of Kepler's Stereometria.

Some pages of the Method remained unused by the author of the palimpsest and thus they are still lost. Between

them, an announced result concerned the volume of the intersection of two cylinders, a figure that Apostol and

Mnatsakanian have renamed n=4 Archimedean globe (and the half of it, n=4 Archimedean dome), whose volume

relates to the n-polygonal pyramid.

Archimedes Palimpsest

42

In Heiberg's time, much attention was paid to Archimedes' brilliant use of infinitesimals to solve problems about

areas, volumes, and centers of gravity. Less attention was given to the Stomachion, a problem treated in the

palimpsest that appears to deal with a children's puzzle. Reviel Netz of Stanford University has argued that

Archimedes discussed the number of ways to solve the puzzle, that is, to put the pieces back in their box. No pieces

have been identified as such; the rules for placement, such as whether pieces are allowed to be turned over, are not

known; and there is doubt about the board. The board illustrated here, as also by Netz, is one proposed by Heinrich

Suter in translating an unpointed Arabic text in which twice and equals are easily confused; Suter makes at least a

typographical error at the crucial point, equating the lengths of a side and diagonal, in which case the board cannot

be a rectangle. But, as the diagonals of a square intersect at right angles, the presence of right triangles makes the

first proposition of Archimedes' Stomachion immediate. Rather, the first proposition sets up a board consisting of

two squares side by side (as in Tangram). A reconciliation of the Suter board with this Codex board was published

by Richard Dixon Oldham, FRS, in Nature in March, 1926, sparking a Stomachion craze that year. Modern

combinatorics reveals that the number of ways to place the pieces of the Suter board to reform their square, allowing

them to be turned over, is 17,152; the number is considerably smaller 64 if pieces are not allowed to be turned

over. The sharpness of some angles in the Suter board makes fabrication difficult, while play could be awkward if

pieces with sharp points are turned over. For the Codex board (again as with Tangram) there are three ways to pack

the pieces: as two unit squares side by side; as two unit squares one on top of the other; and as a single square of side

the square root of two. But the key to these packings is forming isosceles right triangles, just as Socrates gets the

slave boy to consider in Plato's Meno Socrates was arguing for knowledge by recollection, and here pattern

recognition and memory seem more pertinent than a count of solutions. The Codex board can be found as an

extension of Socrates' argument in a seven-by-seven-square grid, suggesting an iterative construction of the

side-diameter numbers that give rational approximations to the square root of two. The fragmentary state of the

palimpsest leaves much in doubt. But it would certainly add to the mystery had Archimedes used the Suter board in

preference to the Codex board. However, if Netz is right, this may have been the most sophisticated work in the field

of combinatorics in Greek antiquity. Either Archimedes used the Suter board, the pieces of which were allowed to be

turned over, or the statistics of the Suter board are irrelevant.

Modern history

The Biblical scholar Constantin von Tischendorf visited Constantinople in the 1840s, and, intrigued by the Greek

mathematics visible on the palimpsest, brought home a page of it. (This page is now in the Cambridge University

Library.) It was Johan Heiberg who realized, when he studied the palimpsest in Constantinople in 1906, that the text

was of Archimedes, and included works otherwise lost. Heiberg took photographs, from which he produced

transcriptions, published between 1910 and 1915 in a complete works of Archimedes. It is not known how the

palimpsest subsequently wound up in France.

[5]

From the 1920s, the manuscript lay unknown in the Paris apartment of a collector of manuscripts and his heirs. In

1998 the ownership of the palimpsest was disputed in federal court in New York in the case of the Greek Orthodox

Patriarchate of Jerusalem v. Christie's, Inc. At some time in the distant past, the Archimedes manuscript had lain in

the library of Mar Saba, near Jerusalem, a monastery bought by the Patriarchate in 1625. The plaintiff contended that

the palimpsest had been stolen from one of its monasteries in the 1920s. Judge Kimba Wood decided in favor of

Christie's Auction House on laches grounds, and the palimpsest was bought for $2 million by an anonymous buyer.

Simon Finch, who represented the anonymous buyer, stated that the buyer was "a private American" who worked in

"the high-tech industry", but was not Bill Gates.

[6]

(The German magazine Der Spiegel reported that the buyer is

probably Jeff Bezos.)

[6]

At the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, the palimpsest was the subject of an extensive imaging study from 1999 to

2008, and conservation (as it had suffered considerably from mold). This was directed by Dr. Will Noel, curator of

manuscripts at the Walters Art Museum, and managed by Michael B. Toth of R.B. Toth Associates, with Dr. Abigail

Archimedes Palimpsest

43

Quandt performing the conservation of the manuscript.

A team of imaging scientists including Dr. Roger Easton from the Rochester Institute of Technology, Dr. Bill

Christens-Barry from Equipoise Imaging, and Dr. Keith Knox with Boeing LTS used computer processing of digital

images from various spectral bands, including ultraviolet and visible light, to reveal most of the underlying text,

including of Archimedes. After imaging and digitally processing the entire palimpsest in three spectral bands prior to

2006, in 2007 they reimaged the entire palimpsest in 12 spectral bands, plus raking light: UV: 365 nanometers;

Visible Light: 445, 470, 505, 530, 570, 617, and 625nm; Infrared: 700, 735, and 870nm; and Raking Light: 910 and

470nm.

[7]

The team digitally processed these images to reveal more of the underlying text with pseudocolor. They

also digitized the original Heiberg images. Dr. Reviel Netz

[8]

of Stanford University and Nigel Wilson have

produced a diplomatic transcription of the text, filling in gaps in Heiberg's account with these images. All images are

currently hosted on the website.

[9]

Sometime after 1938, one owner of the manuscript forged four Byzantine-style religious images in the manuscript in

an effort to increase its value. It appeared that these had rendered the underlying text forever illegible. However, in

May 2005, highly focused X-rays produced at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in Menlo Park, California,

were used by Drs. Uwe Bergman and Bob Morton to begin deciphering the parts of the 174-page text that had not

yet been revealed. The production of X-ray fluorescence was described by Keith Hodgson, director of SSRL.

"Synchrotron light is created when electrons traveling near the speed of light take a curved path around a storage

ringemitting electromagnetic light in X-ray through infrared wavelengths. The resulting light beam has

characteristics that make it ideal for revealing the intricate architecture and utility of many kinds of matterin this

case, the previously hidden work of one of the founding fathers of all science."

[10]

In April 2007, it was announced that a new text had been found in the palimpsest, which was a commentary on the

work of Aristotle attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias. Dr. Will Noel said in an interview: "You start thinking

striking one palimpsest is gold, and striking two is utterly astonishing. But then something even more extraordinary

happened." This referred to the previous discovery of a text by Hypereides, an Athenian politician from the fourth

century BC, which has also been found within the palimpsest.

[4]

It is from his speech Against Diondas, and was

published in 2008 in the German scholarly magazine Zeitschrift fr Papyrologie und Epigraphik, vol. 165, becoming

the first new text from the palimpsest to be published in a scholarly journal.

[11]

The transcriptions of the book were digitally encoded using the Text Encoding Initiative guidelines, and metadata for

the images and transcriptions included identification and cataloging information based on Dublin Core Metadata

Elements. The metadata and data were managed by Dr. Doug Emery of Emery IT.

On October 29, 2008, (the tenth anniversary of the purchase of the palimpsest at auction) all data, including images

and transcriptions, were hosted on the Digital Palimpsest Web Page for free use under a Creative Commons License,

and processed images of the palimpsest in original page order were posted as a Google Book.

[12]

In late 2011 it was

the subject of the Walters Art Museum exhibit "Lost and Found: The Secrets of Archimedes".

Archimedes Palimpsest

44

Notes

[1] Archimedes brought to light (http:/ / www.archimedespalimpsest. org/ pdf/ physicsworld-november2007. pdf) Physics World, November

2007.

[2] "Reading Between the Lines, Smithsonian Magazine" (http:/ / www. smithsonianmag. com/ science-nature/ archimedes. html). . Retrieved

2009-03-31.

[3] "The Archimedes Palimpsest Project" (http:/ / www.archimedespalimpsest. org/ digitalproduct1. html). Archived (http:/ / web. archive. org/

web/ 20090221153000/ http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/ digitalproduct1. html) from the original on 21 February 2009. . Retrieved

2009-03-31.

[4] Morelle, Rebecca (2007-04-26). ""Text Reveals More Ancient Secrets", BBC News" (http:/ / news. bbc. co. uk/ 1/ hi/ technology/ 6591221.

stm). Archived (http:/ / web. archive.org/ web/ 20090219230234/ http:/ / news. bbc. co. uk/ 1/ hi/ technology/ 6591221. stm) from the original

on 19 February 2009. . Retrieved 2009-03-31.

[5] "History of the Archimedes Manuscript" (http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/ palimpsest_history1. html). . Retrieved 2009-03-31.

[6] Hisrhfield, Alan. Eureka Man, Walker & Co, NY, 2009; p. 187.

[7] "File Naming Conventions" (http:/ / archimedespalimpsest. net/ Documents/ Internal/ FileNamingConventions. txt). . Retrieved 2009-03-31.

[8] "The Scholarship of the Palimpsest" (http:/ / www.archimedespalimpsest. org/ scholarship_netz2. html). Archived (http:/ / web. archive.org/

web/ 20090515114709/ http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/ scholarship_netz2. html) from the original on 15 May 2009. . Retrieved

2009-03-31.

[9] Archimedespalimpsest.net (http:/ / archimedespalimpsest. net/ )

[10] "Placed under X-ray gaze, Archimedes manuscript yields secrets lost to time" (http:/ / news-service. stanford. edu/ news/ 2005/ may25/

archimedes-052505.html). . Retrieved 2009-03-31.

[11] Carey, C. et al., "Fragments of Hyperides Against Diondas from the Archimedes Palimpsest" (http:/ / www. uni-koeln. de/ phil-fak/ ifa/

zpe/ indices/ inhaltsverzeichnis_165. pdf), "Inhaltsverzeichnis", Zeitschrift fr Papyrologie und Epigraphik, vol. 165, pp. 1-19. Retrieved

2009-10-11.

[12] Archimedes Palimpsest (http:/ / books.google.com/ books?id=_zX8OG3QoF4C& printsec=frontcover& cad=0). . Retrieved 2009-03-31.

References

Reviel Netz and William Noel, The Archimedes Codex (http:/ / www. orionbooks. co. uk/ books/

the-archimedes-codex-paperback), Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2007

Dijksterhuis, E.J., Archimedes, Princeton U. Press, 1987, pages 129133. copyright 1938, ISBN 0-691-08421-1,

ISBN 0-691-02400-6 (paperback)

External links

The Archimedes Palimpsest Project Web Page (http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/ )

Digital Palimpsest on the Web (http:/ / www. archimedespalimpsest. org/ )

The Nova Program outlined (http:/ / www. pbs. org/ wgbh/ nova/ archimedes/ palimpsest. html)

The Nova Program teacher's version (http:/ / www. pbs. org/ wgbh/ nova/ teachers/ programs/ 3010_archimed.

html)

The Method: English translation (Heiberg's 1909 transcription) (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=suYGAAAAYAAJ)

Did Isaac Barrow read it? (http:/ / dftuz. unizar. es/ ~rivero/ research/ isisletter. htm)

May 2005 Stanford Report: Heather Rock Woods, "Archimedes manuscript yields secrets under X-ray gaze"

(http:/ / news-service. stanford. edu/ news/ 2005/ may25/ archimedes-052505. html) May 19, 2005

Will Noel: Restoring The Archimedes Palimpsest (http:/ / www. youtube. com/ watch?v=t3IP_FmGams)

(YouTube), Ignite (O'Reilly), August 2009

The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem v. Christiess Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13257 (S.D. N.Y. 1999)

(http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20060910145753/ http:/ / www. law. washington. edu/ courses/ andrews/

A503C_WiSp06/ Documents/ Greek_Orthodox_Patriarchate_of_Jerusalem_v. pdf) (via Archive.org)

Eureka! 1,000-year-old text by Greek maths genius Archimedes goes on display (http:/ / www. dailymail. co. uk/

sciencetech/ article-2050631/ Eureka-1-000-year-old-text-Greek-maths-genius-Archimedes-goes-display. html)

Daily Mail, October 18, 2011.

Ren Descartes

45

Ren Descartes

Ren Descartes

Portrait after Frans Hals, 1648

[1]

Born 31 March 1596

La Haye en Touraine, Touraine, France

Died 11 February 1650 (aged53)

Stockholm, Sweden

Nationality French

Era 17th-century philosophy

Region Western Philosophy

Religion

Roman Catholic

[2]

School Cartesianism

Rationalism

Foundationalism

Founder of Cartesianism

Maininterests Metaphysics, Epistemology, Mathematics

Notableideas Cogito ergo sum, method of doubt, Cartesian coordinate system, Cartesian dualism, ontological argument for the existence of

Christian God, mathesis universalis;

folium of Descartes

Signature

Ren Descartes (French:[ne dekat]; Latinized: Renatus Cartesius; adjectival form: "Cartesian";

[3]

31 March

1596 11 February 1650) was a French philosopher, mathematician, and writer who spent most of his adult life in

the Dutch Republic. He has been dubbed the 'Father of Modern Philosophy', and much subsequent Western

philosophy is a response to his writings,

[4][5]

which are studied closely to this day. In particular, his Meditations on

First Philosophy continues to be a standard text at most university philosophy departments. Descartes' influence in

mathematics is equally apparent; the Cartesian coordinate system allowing reference to a point in space as a set of

numbers, and allowing algebraic equations to be expressed as geometric shapes in a two-dimensional coordinate

system (and conversely, shapes to be described as equations) was named after him. He is credited as the father of

analytical geometry, the bridge between algebra and geometry, crucial to the discovery of infinitesimal calculus and

analysis. Descartes was also one of the key figures in the Scientific Revolution and has been described as an example

of genius.

Ren Descartes

46

Descartes frequently sets his views apart from those of his predecessors. In the opening section of the Passions of the

Soul, a treatise on the Early Modern version of what are now commonly called emotions, Descartes goes so far as to

assert that he will write on this topic "as if no one had written on these matters before". Many elements of his

philosophy have precedents in late Aristotelianism, the revived Stoicism of the 16th century, or in earlier

philosophers like Augustine. In his natural philosophy, he differs from the schools on two major points: First, he

rejects the analysis of corporeal substance into matter and form; second, he rejects any appeal to endsdivine or

naturalin explaining natural phenomena.

[6]

In his theology, he insists on the absolute freedom of God's act of

creation.

Descartes was a major figure in 17th-century continental rationalism, later advocated by Baruch Spinoza and

Gottfried Leibniz, and opposed by the empiricist school of thought consisting of Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley,

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Hume. Leibniz, Spinoza and Descartes were all well versed in mathematics as well as

philosophy, and Descartes and Leibniz contributed greatly to science as well.

He is perhaps best known for the philosophical statement "Cogito ergo sum" (French: Je pense, donc je suis;

English: I think, therefore I am), found in part IV of Discourse on the Method (1637 written in French but with

inclusion of "Cogito ergo sum") and 7 of part I of Principles of Philosophy (1644 written in Latin).

Biography

Graduation registry for Descartes at the Collge

Royal Henry-Le-Grand, La Flche, 1616

Descartes was born in La Haye en Touraine (now Descartes),

Indre-et-Loire, France. When he was one year old, his mother Jeanne

Brochard died. His father Joachim was a member of the Parlement of

Brittany at Rennes.

[7]

In 1606 or 1607 he entered the Jesuit Collge

Royal Henry-Le-Grand at La Flche

[8]

where he was introduced to

mathematics and physics, including Galileo's work.

[9]

After graduation

in December 1616, he studied at the University of Poitiers, earning a

Baccalaurat and Licence in law, in accordance with his father's

wishes that he should become a lawyer.

[10]

"I entirely abandoned the study of letters. Resolving to seek no

knowledge other than that of which could be found in myself or else in

the great book of the world, I spent the rest of my youth traveling,

visiting courts and armies, mixing with people of diverse

temperaments and ranks, gathering various experiences, testing myself

in the situations which fortune offered me, and at all times reflecting upon whatever came my way so as to derive

some profit from it." (Descartes, Discourse on the Method).

In 1618, Descartes was engaged in the army of Maurice of Nassau in the Dutch Republic, but as a truce had been

established between Holland and Spain, Descartes used his spare time to study mathematics.

[11]

In this way he

became acquainted with Isaac Beeckman, principal of Dordrecht school. Beeckman had proposed a difficult

mathematical problem, and to his astonishment, it was the young Descartes who found the solution. Both believed

that it was necessary to create a method that thoroughly linked mathematics and physics.

[12]

While in the service of

the Duke Maximilian of Bavaria, Descartes was present at the Battle of the White Mountain outside Prague, in

November 1620.

[13]

On the night of 1011 November 1619, while stationed in Neuburg an der Donau, Germany, Descartes experienced

a series of three powerful dreams or visions that he later claimed profoundly influenced his life. He concluded from

these visions that the pursuit of science would prove to be, for him, the pursuit of true wisdom and a central part of

his life's work.

[14]

Descartes also saw very clearly that all truths were linked with one another, so that finding a

fundamental truth and proceeding with logic would open the way to all science. This basic truth, Descartes found

Ren Descartes

47

quite soon: his famous "I think".

[12]

In 1622 he returned to France, and during the next few years spent time in Paris and other parts of Europe. It was

during a stay in Paris that he composed his first essay on method: Regulae ad Directionem Ingenii (Rules for the

Direction of the Mind).

[12]

He arrived in La Haye in 1623, selling all of his property to invest in bonds, which

provided a comfortable income for the rest of his life. Descartes was present at the siege of La Rochelle by Cardinal

Richelieu in 1627.

He returned to the Dutch Republic in 1628, where he lived until September 1649. In April 1629 he joined the

University of Franeker, living at the Sjaerdemaslot, and the next year, under the name "Poitevin", he enrolled at the

Leiden University to study mathematics with Jacob Golius and astronomy with Martin Hortensius.

[15]

In October

1630 he had a falling-out with Beeckman, whom he accused of plagiarizing some of his ideas. In Amsterdam, he had

a relationship with a servant girl, Helena Jans van der Strom, with whom he had a daughter, Francine, who was born

in 1635 in Deventer, at which time Descartes taught at the Utrecht University. Francine Descartes died in 1640 in

Amersfoort, from Scarlet Fever.

While in the Netherlands he changed his address frequently, living among other places in Dordrecht (1628),

Franeker (1629), Amsterdam (162930), Leiden (1630), Amsterdam (163032), Deventer (163234), Amsterdam

(163435), Utrecht (163536), Leiden (1636), Egmond (163638), Santpoort (16381640), Leiden (164041),

Endegeest (a castle near Oegstgeest) (164143), and finally for an extended time in Egmond-Binnen (164349).

Despite these frequent moves he wrote all his major work during his 20-plus years in the Netherlands, where he

managed to revolutionize mathematics and philosophy. In 1633, Galileo was condemned by the Roman Catholic

Church, and Descartes abandoned plans to publish Treatise on the World, his work of the previous four years.

Nevertheless, in 1637 he published part of this work in three essays: Les Mtores (The Meteors), La Dioptrique

(Dioptrics) and La Gomtrie (Geometry), preceded by an introduction, his famous Discours de la Mtode

(Discourse on the Method). In it Descartes lays out four rules of thought, meant to ensure that our knowledge rests

upon a firm foundation.

Ren Descartes (right) with Queen Christina of

Sweden (left).

Descartes continued to publish works concerning both mathematics

and philosophy for the rest of his life. In 1641 he published a

metaphysics work, Meditationes de Prima Philosophia (Meditations on

First Philosophy), written in Latin and thus addressed to the learned. It

was followed, in 1644, by Principia Philosophi (Principles of

Philosophy), a kind of synthesis of the Meditations and the Discourse.

In 1643, Cartesian philosophy was condemned at the University of

Utrecht, and Descartes began his long correspondence with Princess

Elisabeth of Bohemia, devoted mainly to moral and psychological

subjects. Connected with this correspondence, in 1649 he published

Les Passions de l'me (Passions of the Soul), that he dedicated to the

Princess. In 1647, he was awarded a pension by the King of France.

Descartes was interviewed by Frans Burman at Egmond-Binnen in

1648.

A French translation of Principia Philosophi, prepared by Abbot Claude Picot, was published in 1647. This edition

Descartes dedicated to Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia. In the preface Descartes praised true philosophy as a means to

attain wisdom. He identifies four ordinary sources to reach wisdom, and finally says that there is a fifth, better and

more secure, consisting in the search for first causes.

[16]

Ren Descartes died on 11 February 1650 in Stockholm, Sweden, where he had been invited as a tutor for Queen

Christina of Sweden. The cause of death was said to be pneumonia; accustomed to working in bed until noon, he

may have suffered damage to his health from Christina's demands for early morning study (the lack of sleep could

Ren Descartes

48

have severely compromised his immune system). Descartes stayed at the French ambassador Pierre Chanut.

In 1663, the Pope placed his works on the Index of Prohibited Books.

The tomb of Descartes (middle, with detail of the

inscription), in the Abbey of

Saint-Germain-des-Prs, Paris

As a Roman Catholic in a Protestant nation, he was interred in a

graveyard used mainly for unbaptized infants in Adolf Fredriks kyrka

in Stockholm. Later, his remains were taken to France and buried in

the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prs in Paris. Although the National

Convention in 1792 had planned to transfer his remains to the

Panthon, they are, two centuries later, still resting between two other

graves those of the scholarly monks Jean Mabillon and Bernard de

Montfaucon in a chapel of the abbey. His memorial, erected in the

18th century, remains in the Swedish church.

Religious beliefs

The religious beliefs of Ren Descartes have been rigorously debated

within scholarly circles. He claimed to be a devout Roman Catholic,

claiming that one of the purposes of the Meditations was to defend the Christian faith. However, in his own era,

Descartes was accused of harboring secret deist or atheist beliefs. Contemporary Blaise Pascal said that "I cannot

forgive Descartes; in all his philosophy, Descartes did his best to dispense with God. But Descartes could not avoid

prodding God to set the world in motion with a snap of his lordly fingers; after that, he had no more use for God."

[17]

Stephen Gaukroger's biography of Descartes reports that "he had a deep religious faith as a Catholic, which he

retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth."

[18]

After Descartes died in

Sweden, Queen Christina abdicated her throne to convert to Roman Catholicism (Swedish law required a Protestant

ruler). The only Roman Catholic with whom she had prolonged contact was Descartes, who was her personal

tutor.

[19]

Philosophical work

Descartes is often regarded as the first thinker to emphasize the use of reason to develop the natural sciences.

[20]

For

him the philosophy was a thinking system that embodied all knowledge, and expressed it in this way:

[21]

Thus, all Philosophy is like a tree, of which Metaphysics is the root, Physics the trunk, and all the other sciences the branches that grow out of

this trunk, which are reduced to three principal, namely, Medicine, Mechanics, and Ethics. By the science of Morals, I understand the highest

and most perfect which, presupposing an entire knowledge of the other sciences, is the last degree of wisdom.

In his Discourse on the Method, he attempts to arrive at a fundamental set of principles that one can know as true

without any doubt. To achieve this, he employs a method called hyperbolical/metaphysical doubt, also sometimes

referred to as methodological skepticism: he rejects any ideas that can be doubted, and then reestablishes them in

order to acquire a firm foundation for genuine knowledge.

[22]

Initially, Descartes arrives at only a single principle: thought exists. Thought cannot be separated from me, therefore,

I exist (Discourse on the Method and Principles of Philosophy). Most famously, this is known as cogito ergo sum

(English: "I think, therefore I am"). Therefore, Descartes concluded, if he doubted, then something or someone must

be doing the doubting, therefore the very fact that he doubted proved his existence. "The simple meaning of the

phrase is that if one is sceptical of existence, that is in and of itself proof that he does exist."

[23]

Ren Descartes

49

Ren Descartes at work

Descartes concludes that he can be certain that he exists because he

thinks. But in what form? He perceives his body through the use of the

senses; however, these have previously been unreliable. So Descartes

determines that the only indubitable knowledge is that he is a thinking

thing. Thinking is what he does, and his power must come from his

essence. Descartes defines "thought" (cogitatio) as "what happens in

me such that I am immediately conscious of it, insofar as I am

conscious of it". Thinking is thus every activity of a person of which he

is immediately conscious.

[24]

To further demonstrate the limitations of the senses, Descartes

proceeds with what is known as the Wax Argument. He considers a

piece of wax; his senses inform him that it has certain characteristics,

such as shape, texture, size, color, smell, and so forth. When he brings

the wax towards a flame, these characteristics change completely.

However, it seems that it is still the same thing: it is still the same piece

of wax, even though the data of the senses inform him that all of its

characteristics are different. Therefore, in order to properly grasp the

nature of the wax, he should put aside the senses. He must use his

mind. Descartes concludes:

And so something which I thought I was seeing with my eyes is in fact grasped solely by the faculty of judgment which is in my mind.

In this manner, Descartes proceeds to construct a system of knowledge, discarding perception as unreliable and

instead admitting only deduction as a method. In the third and fifth Meditation, he offers an ontological proof of a

benevolent God (through both the ontological argument and trademark argument). Because God is benevolent, he

can have some faith in the account of reality his senses provide him, for God has provided him with a working mind

and sensory system and does not desire to deceive him. From this supposition, however, he finally establishes the

possibility of acquiring knowledge about the world based on deduction and perception. In terms of epistemology

therefore, he can be said to have contributed such ideas as a rigorous conception of foundationalism and the

possibility that reason is the only reliable method of attaining knowledge. He, nevertheless, was very much aware

that experimentation was necessary in order to verify and validate theories.

[21]

Descartes also wrote a response to scepticism about the existence of the external world. He argues that sensory

perceptions come to him involuntarily, and are not willed by him. They are external to his senses, and according to

Descartes, this is evidence of the existence of something outside of his mind, and thus, an external world. Descartes

goes on to show that the things in the external world are material by arguing that God would not deceive him as to

the ideas that are being transmitted, and that God has given him the "propensity" to believe that such ideas are

caused by material things.

Dualism

Descartes in his Passions of the Soul and The Description of the Human Body suggested that the body works like a

machine, that it has material properties. The mind (or soul), on the other hand, was described as a nonmaterial and

does not follow the laws of nature. Descartes argued that the mind interacts with the body at the pineal gland. This

form of dualism or duality proposes that the mind controls the body, but that the body can also influence the

otherwise rational mind, such as when people act out of passion. Most of the previous accounts of the relationship

between mind and body had been uni-directional.

Ren Descartes

50

Descartes suggested that the pineal gland is "the seat of the soul" for several reasons. First, the soul is unitary, and

unlike many areas of the brain the pineal gland appeared to be unitary (though subsequent microscopic inspection

has revealed it is formed of two hemispheres). Second, Descartes observed that the pineal gland was located near the

ventricles. He believed the cerebrospinal fluid of the ventricles acted through the nerves to control the body, and that

the pineal gland influenced this process. Cartesian dualism set the agenda for philosophical discussion of the

mindbody problem for many years after Descartes's death.

[25]

In present day discussions on the practice of animal vivisection, it is normal to consider Descartes as an advocate of

this practice, as a result of his dualistic philosophy. Some of the sources say that Descartes denied the animals could

feel pain, and therefore could be used without concern.

[26]

Other sources consider that Descartes denied that animal

had reason or intelligence, but did not lack sensations or perceptions, but these could be explained

mechanistically.

[27]

Descartes' moral philosophy

For Descartes, morals was a science, the highest and most perfect of them, and like the rest of sciences had its roots

in Metaphysics.

[21]

In this way he argues for the existence of God, investigates the place of men in nature, formulates

the theory of mind-body dualism and defends free will. But, he being a convinced rationalist, clearly estates that

reason suffices us in the search for the goods we should seek, and for him, virtue consists in the correct reasoning

that should guide our actions. Nevertheless, the quality of this reasoning depends on knowledge, as a well informed

mind will be more capable of making good choices, and also on mental condition. For this reason he said that a

complete moral philosophy should include the study of the body. He discussed this subject in the correspondence

with Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, and as a result wrote his work The Passions of the Soul, that contains a study of

the psychosomatic processes and reactions in man, with an emphasis on emotions or passions.

[28]

Men should seek the sovereign good that Descartes, following Zeno, identifies with virtue, as this produces a solid

blessedness or pleasure. For Epicurus the sovereign good was pleasure, and Descartes says that in fact this is not in

contradiction with Zeno's teaching, because virtue produces a spiritual pleasure, that is better than bodily pleasure.

Regarding Aristotle opinion that happiness depends on the goods of fortune, Descartes does not deny that this goods

contribute to happiness, but remarks that they are in great proportion outside our control, whereas our mind is under

our complete control.

[28]

The moral writings of Descartes came at the last part of his life, but earlier, in his Discourse on Method he adopted

three maxims to be able to act while he put all his ideas into doubt. This is known as his "Provisional Morals".

Historical impact

Emancipation from Church doctrine

Descartes has been often dubbed as the father of modern Western philosophy, the philosopher that with his sceptic

approach has profoundly changed the course of Western philosophy and set the basis for modernity.

[4][29]

The first

two of his Meditations on First Philosophy, those that formulate the famous methodic doubt, are the portion of

Descartes writings that most influenced modern thinking.

[30]

It has been argued that Descartes himself didn't realize

the extent of his revolutionary gesture.

[31]

In shifting the debate from "what is true" to "of what can I be certain?,"

Descartes shifted the authoritative guarantor of truth from God to Man (While traditional concept of "truth" implies

an external authority, "certainty" instead relies on the judgement of the individual Man). In an anthropocentric

revolution, Man is now raised to the level of a subject, an agent, an emancipated being equipped with autonomous

reason. This is a revolutionary step which posed the basis of modernity (whose repercussion are still ongoing): the

emancipation of man from Christian revelational truth and Church doctrine, a man that makes his own law and takes

its own stand.

[32][33][34]

In modernity, the guarantor of truth is not God anymore but Man, a "self-conscious shaper

and guarantor" of his reality.

[35][36]

Man in this way is turned into a reasoning adult, a subject and agent,

[35]

as

Ren Descartes

51

opposed to a child obedient to God. This change in perspective was characteristic of the shift from the Christian

mediaval period to the modern period, it had been anticipated in other fields and now Descartes was giving it a

formulation in the field of philosophy.

[35][37]

This anthropocentric perspective, establishing human reason as autonomous, posed the basis for the Enlightenment's

emancipation from God and the Church. It also posed the basis for all subsequent anthropology.

[38]

Descartes

philosophical revolution is sometimes said to have sparked modern anthropocentrism and subjectivism.

[4][39][40][41]

Mathematical legacy

One of Descartes' most enduring legacies was his development of Cartesian or analytic geometry, which uses algebra

to describe geometry. He "invented the convention of representing unknowns in equations by x, y, and z, and knowns

by a, b, and c". He also "pioneered the standard notation" that uses superscripts to show the powers or exponents; for

example, the 4 used in x

4

to indicate squaring of squaring.

[42]

He was first to assign a fundamental place for algebra

in our system of knowledge, and believed that algebra was a method to automate or mechanize reasoning,

particularly about abstract, unknown quantities. European mathematicians had previously viewed geometry as a

more fundamental form of mathematics, serving as the foundation of algebra. Algebraic rules were given geometric

proofs by mathematicians such as Pacioli, Cardan, Tartaglia and Ferrari. Equations of degree higher than the third

were regarded as unreal, because a three dimensional form, such as a cube, occupied the largest dimension of reality.

Descartes professed that the abstract quantity a

2

could represent length as well as an area. This was in opposition to

the teachings of mathematicians, such as Vieta, who argued that it could represent only area. Although Descartes did

not pursue the subject, he preceded Leibniz in envisioning a more general science of algebra or "universal

mathematics," as a precursor to symbolic logic, that could encompass logical principles and methods symbolically,

and mechanize general reasoning.

[43]

Descartes' work provided the basis for the calculus developed by Newton and Leibniz, who applied infinitesimal

calculus to the tangent line problem, thus permitting the evolution of that branch of modern mathematics.

[44]

His rule

of signs is also a commonly used method to determine the number of positive and negative roots of a polynomial.

Descartes discovered an early form of the law of conservation of mechanical momentum (a measure of the motion of

an object), and envisioned it as pertaining to motion in a straight line, as opposed to perfect circular motion, as

Galileo had envisioned it. He outlined his views on the universe in his Principles of Philosophy.

Descartes also made contributions to the field of optics. He showed by using geometric construction and the law of

refraction (also known as Descartes's law or more commonly Snell's law, who discovered it 16 years earlier) that the

angular radius of a rainbow is 42 degrees (i.e., the angle subtended at the eye by the edge of the rainbow and the ray

passing from the sun through the rainbow's centre is 42).

[45]

He also independently discovered the law of reflection,

and his essay on optics was the first published mention of this law.

[46]

Ren Descartes

52

Contemporary reception

Although Descartes was well known in academic circles towards the end of his life, the teaching of his works in

schools was controversial. Henri de Roy (Henricus Regius, 15981679), Professor of Medicine at the University of

Utrecht, was condemned by the Rector of the University, Gijsbert Voet (Voetius), for teaching Descartes's

physics.

[47]

Writings

Handwritten letter by Descartes, December 1638.

1618. Compendium Musicae. A treatise on music theory and the

aesthetics of music written for Descartes's early collaborator, Isaac

Beeckman.

16261628. Regulae ad directionem ingenii (Rules for the Direction

of the Mind). Incomplete. First published posthumously in Dutch

translation in 1684 and in the original Latin at Amsterdam in 1701

(R. Des-Cartes Opuscula Posthuma Physica et Mathematica). The

best critical edition, which includes the Dutch translation of 1684, is

edited by Giovanni Crapulli (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966).

16301633. Le Monde (The World) and L'Homme (Man).

Descartes's first systematic presentation of his natural philosophy.

Man was published posthumously in Latin translation in 1662; and

The World posthumously in 1664.

1637. Discours de la mthode (Discourse on the Method). An

introduction to the Essais, which include the Dioptrique, the

Mtores and the Gomtrie.

1637. La Gomtrie (Geometry). Descartes's major work in

mathematics. There is an English translation by Michael Mahoney

(New York: Dover, 1979).

1641. Meditationes de prima philosophia (Meditations on First Philosophy), also known as Metaphysical

Meditations. In Latin; a French translation, probably done without Descartes's supervision, was published in 1647.

Includes six Objections and Replies. A second edition, published the following year, included an additional

objection and reply, and a Letter to Dinet.

1644. Principia philosophiae (Principles of Philosophy), a Latin textbook at first intended by Descartes to replace

the Aristotelian textbooks then used in universities. A French translation, Principes de philosophie by Claude

Picot, under the supervision of Descartes, appeared in 1647 with a letter-preface to Princess Elisabeth of

Bohemia.

1647. Notae in programma (Comments on a Certain Broadsheet). A reply to Descartes's one-time disciple

Henricus Regius.

1647. La description du corps humaine (The Description of the Human Body). Published posthumously.

1648. Responsiones Renati Des Cartes... (Conversation with Burman). Notes on a Q&A session between

Descartes and Frans Burman on 16 April 1648. Rediscovered in 1895 and published for the first time in 1896. An

annotated bilingual edition (Latin with French translation), edited by Jean-Marie Beyssade, was published in 1981

(Paris: PUF).

1649. Les passions de l'me (Passions of the Soul). Dedicated to Princess Elisabeth of the Palatinate.

1656. Musicae Compendium (Instruction in Music). Posth. Publ.: Johannes Janssonius jun., Amsterdam.

1657. Correspondance. Published by Descartes's literary executor Claude Clerselier. The third edition, in 1667,

was the most complete; Clerselier omitted, however, much of the material pertaining to mathematics.

Ren Descartes

53

In January 2010, a previously unknown letter from Descartes, dated 27 May 1641, was found by the Dutch

philosopher Erik-Jan Bos when browsing through Google. Bos found the letter mentioned in a summary of

autographs kept by Haverford College in Haverford, Pennsylvania. The College was unaware that the letter had

never been published. This was the third letter by Descartes found in the last 25 years.

[48][49]

Notes

[1] Russell Shorto. Descartes' Bones. (Doubleday, 2008) p. 218; see also The Louvre, Atlas Database, http:/ / cartelen. louvre. fr

[2] "Ren Descartes" (http:/ / www. newadvent.org/ cathen/ 04744b. htm). Newadvent.org. . Retrieved 30 May 2012. "...preferred to avoid all

collision with ecclesiastical authority."

[3] Colie, Rosalie L. (1957). Light and Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press. p.58.

[4] Bertrand Russell (2004) History of western philosophy (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=Ey94E3sOMA0C& pg=PA516) pp.511, 516-7

[5] Watson, Richard A. (31 March 2012). "Ren Descartes" (http:/ / www. britannica. com/ EBchecked/ topic/ 158787/ Rene-Descartes).

Encyclopdia Britannica (Encyclopdia Britannica Online. Encyclopdia Britannica Inc). . Retrieved 31 March 2012.

[6] Carlson, Neil R. (2001). Physiology of Behavior. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Pearson: Allyn & Bacon. p.8. ISBN0-205-30840-6.

[7] Rodis-Lewis, Genevive (1992). "Descartes' life and the development of his philosophy" (http:/ / books. google. dk/

books?id=Prhr9FBdQ_MC). In Cottingham, John. The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. p.22.

ISBN978-0-521-36696-0. .

[8] [8] Desmond, p. 24

[9] Porter, Roy (1999) [1997]. "The New Science". The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the

Present (paperback edition, 135798642 ed.). Great Britain: Harper Collins. p.217. ISBN0006374549.

[10] Baird, Forrest E.; Walter Kaufmann (2008). From Plato to Derrida. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp.373377.

ISBN0-13-158591-6.

[11] "Ren Descartes" (http:/ / www. famousscientists.org/ rene-descartes). FamousScientists.org. . Retrieved 15 December 2011.

[12] [12] Guy Durandin, Les Principes de la Philosophie. Introduction et notes, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, Paris, 1970.

[13] Battle of White Mountain (http:/ / www. britannica.com/ EBchecked/ topic/ 642395/ Battle-of-White-Mountain), Britannica Online

Encyclopedia

[14] Clarke, Desmond (2006). Descartes: A biography, pp. 5859. Cambridge U. Press. http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=W3D9KGVyz6sC

[15] A.C. Grayling, Descartes: The Life of Rene Descartes and Its Place in His Times, Simon and Schuster, 2006, pp 151152

[16] [16] Blom, John J., Descartes. His Moral Philosophy and Psychology. New York University Press, 1978. ISBN 0-8147-0999-0

[17] Think Exist on Blaise Pascal (http:/ / thinkexist. com/ quotation/ i_cannot_forgive_descartes-in_all_his_philosophy/ 153298. html).

Retrieved 12 February 2009.

[18] The Religious Affiliation of philosopher and mathematician Rene Descartes (http:/ / www. adherents. com/ people/ pd/ Rene_Descartes.

html). Webpage last modified 5 October 2005.

[19] Smith, Kurt (Fall 2010). "Descartes' Life and Works" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-works/ ). The Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy. .

[20] Emily Grosholz (1991). Cartesian method and the problem of reduction (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?hl=en& lr=&

id=2EtAVLU1eIAC& oi=fnd& pg=PA1). Oxford University Press. ISBN0-19-824250-6. . "But contemporary debate has tended

to...understand [Cartesian method] merely as the 'method of doubt'...I want to define Descartes's method in broader terms...to trace its impact

on the domains of mathematics and physics as well as metaphysics."

[21] Ren Descartes; Translator John Veitch. "Letter of the Author to the French Translator of the Principles of Philosophy serving for a preface"

(http:/ / www. classicallibrary.org/ descartes/ principles/ preface. htm). . Retrieved December 2011.

[22] Rebecca, Copenhaver. "Forms of skepticism" (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20050108095032/ http:/ / www. lclark. edu/ ~rebeccac/ forms.

html). Archived from the original (http:/ / www.lclark. edu/ ~rebeccac/ forms. html) on 8 January 2005. . Retrieved 15 August 2007.

[23] "Ten books: Chosen by Raj Persuade" (http:/ / bjp. rcpsych. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 181/ 3/ 258). The British Journal of Psychiatry. .

[24] Descartes, Ren (1644). The Principles of Philosophy (IX).

[25] [25] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online): Descartes and the Pineal Gland.

[26] Richard Dawkins (June 2012). "Richard Dawkins on vivisection: "But can they suffer?" (http:/ / boingboing. net/ 2011/ 06/ 30/

richard-dawkins-on-v. html). Boingboing. . Retrieved 2 July 2012.

[27] "Animal Consciousness, #2. Historical background" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ consciousness-animal/ #hist). Stanford

Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Dec 1995/rev Oct 2010. . Retrieved 2 July 2012.

[28] [28] Blom, John J., Descartes. His moral philosophy and psychology. New York University Press. 1978. ISBN 0-8147-0999-0

[29] [29] Heidegger [1938] (2002) p.76 quotation:

Descartes... that which he himself founded... modern (and that means, at the same time, Western) metaphysics.

[30] Schmaltz, Tad M. Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=pIYcUBCOrNgC&

pg=PA27) p.27 quotation:

Ren Descartes

54

The Descartes most familiar to twentieth-century philosophers is the Descartes of the first two Meditations,

someone proccupied with hyperbolic doubt of the material world and the certainty of knowledge of the self

that emerges from the famous cogito argument.

[31] Roy Wood Sellars (1949) Philosophy for the future: the quest of modern materialism (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=y1wNAAAAIAAJ) quotation:

Husserl has taken Descartes very seriously in a historical as well as in a systematic sense [...] [in The Crisis of

the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Husserl] finds in the first two Meditations of

Descartes a depth which it is difficult to fathom, and which Descartes himself was so little able to appreciate

that he let go "the great discovery" he had in his hands.

[32] Martin Heidegger [1938] (2002) The Age of the World Picture quotation:

For up to Descartes...a particular sub-iectum...lies at the foundation of its own fixed qualities and changing

circumstances. The superiority of a sub-iectum...arises out of the claim of man to a...self-supported,

unshakable foundation of truth, in the sense of certainty. Why and how does this claim acquire its decisive

authority? The claim originates in that emancipation of man in which he frees himself from obligation to

Christian revelational truth and Church doctrine to a legislating for himself that takes its stand upon itself.

[33] Ingraffia, Brian D. (1995) Postmodern theory and biblical theology: vanquishing God's shadow (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=LHjZYbOLG8cC& pg=PA126) p.126

[34] Norman K. Swazo (2002) Crisis theory and world order: Heideggerian reflections (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=INP_cy6Mu7EC& pg=PA97) pp.97-9

[35] Lovitt, Tom (1977) introduction to Martin Heidegger's The question concerning technology, and other essays, pp.xxv-xxvi

[36] Briton, Derek The modern practice of adult education: a postmodern critique (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=Hd_xwb6EolMC&

pg=PA76) p.76

[37] Martin Heidegger The Word of Nietzsche: God is Dead pp.88-90

[38] [38] Heidegger [1938] (2002) p.75 quotation:

With the interpretation of man as subiectum, Descartes creates the metaphysical presupposition for future

anthropology of every kind and tendency.

[39] Benjamin Isadore Schwart China and Other Matters (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=Wt4XDLEpjWYC& pg=PA95) p.95 quotation:

...the kind of anthropocentric subjectivism which has emerged from the Cartesian revolution.

[40] Charles B. Guignon Heidegger and the problem of knowledge (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=5vFCfdWD5QEC& pg=PA23) p.23

[41] Husserl, Edmund (1931) Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology quotation:

When, with the beginning of modern times, religious belief was becoming more and more externalized as a

lifeless convention, men of intellect were lifted by a new belief, their great belief in an autonomous philosophy

and science. [...] in philosophy, the Meditations were epoch-making in a quite unique sense, and precisely

because of their going back to the pure ego cogito. Descartes, in fact, inaugurates an entirely new kind of

philosophy. Changing its total style, philosophy takes a radical turn: from nave Objectivism to transcendental

subjectivism.

[42] Tom Sorelli, Descartes: A Very Short Introduction, (2000). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 19.

[43] Morris Kline, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, (1972). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 280-281

[44] Gullberg, Jan (1997). Mathematics From The Birth Of Numbers. W. W. Norton. ISBN0-393-04002-X.

[45] Tipler, P. A. and G. Mosca (2004). Physics For Scientists And Engineers. W. H. Freeman. ISBN0-7167-4389-2.

[46] "Ren Descartes" (http:/ / encarta. msn.com/ encyclopedia_761555262/ Rene_Descartes. html#s3). Encarta. Microsoft. 2008. . Retrieved 15

August 2007.

[47] Cottingham, John, Dugald Murdoch, and Robert Stoothof. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes.Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press. 1985. 293.

[48] Vlasblom, Dirk (25 February 2010). "Unknown letter from Descartes found" (http:/ / www. nrc. nl/ international/ article2492445. ece/

Unknown_letter_from_Descartes_found). Nrc.nl. . Retrieved 30 May 2012.

[49] (Dutch) " Hoe Descartes in 1641 op andere gedachten kwam Onbekende brief van Franse filosoof gevonden" (http:/ / www. nrc.nl/

wetenschap/ article2491995. ece/ Hoe_Descartes_in_1641_op_andere_gedachten_kwam)

Ren Descartes

55

Bibliography

References

Collected works

Oeuvres de Descartes edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, Paris: Lopold Cerf, 18971913, 13 volumes;

new revised edition, Paris: Vrin-CNRS, 19641974, 11 vol.

This work is traditionally cited with the initials AT (for Adam and Tannery) followed by a volume number in Roman

numerals; thus AT VII refers to Oeuvres de Descartes volume 7.

Oeuvres de jeunesse (1616-1631) edited by Vincent Carraud, Paris: PUF, 2012.

Collected English translations

1955. The Philosophical Works, E.S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross, trans. Dover Publications. This work is

traditionally cited with the initials HR (for Haldane and Ross) followed by a volume number in Roman numerals;

thus HRII refers to volume 2 of this edition.

1988. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes in 3 vols. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Kenny, A., and Murdoch,

D., trans. Cambridge University Press.

Single works

1618. Compendium Musicae.

1628. Rules for the Direction of the Mind.

1637. Discourse on the Method ("Discours de la Methode"). An introduction to Dioptrique, Des Mtores and La

Gomtrie. Original in French, because intended for a wider public.

1637. La Gomtrie. Smith, David E., and Lantham, M. L., trans., 1954. The Geometry of Ren Descartes. Dover.

1641. Meditations on First Philosophy. Cottingham, J., trans., 1996. Cambridge University Press. Latin original.

Alternative English title: Metaphysical Meditations. Includes six Objections and Replies. A second edition

published the following year, includes an additional Objection and Reply and a Letter to Dinet. HTML Online

Latin-French-English Edition (http:/ / www. wright. edu/ cola/ descartes/ intro. html)

1644. Les Principes de la philosophie. Miller, V. R. and R. P., trans., 1983. Principles of Philosophy. Reidel.

1647. Comments on a Certain Broadsheet.

1647. The Description of the Human Body.

1648. Conversation with Burman.

1649. Passions of the Soul. Voss, S. H., trans., 1989. Indianapolis: Hackett. Dedicated to Princess Elizabeth of

Bohemia.

Secondary literature

Boyer, Carl (1985). A History of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN0-691-02391-3.

Carriero, John (2008). Between Two Worlds. Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-13561-8.

Clarke, Desmond (2006). Descartes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ISBN0-521-82301-3.

Costabel, Pierre (1987). Ren Descartes Exercices pour les lments des solides. Paris: Presses Universitaires

de France. ISBN2-13-040099-X.

Cottingham, John (1992). The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ISBN0-521-36696-8.

Duncan, Steven M. (2008). The Proof of the External World: Cartesian Theism and the Possibility of Knowledge.

Cambridge: James Clarke & Co. ISBN 978-02271-7267-4 http:/ / www. lutterworth. com/ jamesclarke/ jc/ titles/

Ren Descartes

56

proofew. htm.

Farrell, John. "Demons of Descartes and Hobbes." Paranoia and Modernity: Cervantes to Rousseau (Cornell UP,

2006), chapter 7.

Garber, Daniel (1992). Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

ISBN0-226-28219-8.

Garber, Daniel; Michael Ayers (1998). The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-53721-5.

Gaukroger, Stephen (1995). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ISBN0-19-823994-7.

Grayling, A.C. (2005). Descartes: The Life and times of a Genius. New York: Walker Publishing Co., Inc..

ISBN0-8027-1501-X.

Gillespie, A. (2006). Descartes' demon: A dialogical analysis of 'Meditations on First Philosophy.' (http:/ / stir.

academia. edu/ documents/ 0011/ 0112/

Gillespie_Descartes_demon_a_dialogical_analysis_of_meditations_on_first_philosophy. pdf) Theory &

Psychology, 16, 761781.

Martin Heidegger [1938] (2002) The Age of the World Picture in Off the beaten track (http:/ / books. google.

com/ books?id=QImd2ARqQPMC& pg=PA66)

Keeling, S. V. (1968). Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN.

Melchert, Norman (2002). The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. New York:

McGraw Hill. ISBN0-19-517510-7.

Moreno Romo, Juan Carlos (Coord.), Descartes vivo. Ejercicios de hermenutica cartesiana, Anthropos,

Barcelona, 2007'

Ozaki, Makoto (1991). Kartenspiel, oder Kommentar zu den Meditationen des Herrn Descartes. Berlin: Klein

Verlag.. ISBN3-927199-01-X.

Moreno Romo, Juan Carlos, Vindicacin del cartesianismo radical, Anthropos, Barcelona, 2010.

Schfer, Rainer (2006). Zweifel und Sein Der Ursprung des modernen Selbstbewusstseins in Descartes' cogito.

Wuerzburg: Koenigshausen&Neumann. ISBN3-8260-3202-0.

Serfati, M., 2005, "Geometria" in Ivor Grattan-Guinness, ed., Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics.

Elsevier: 122.

Sorrell, Tom (1987). Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.. ISBN0-19-287636-8.

Vrooman, Jack Rochford (1970). Ren Descartes: A Biography. Putnam Press.

Watson, Richard A. (31 March 2012). "Ren Descartes" (http:/ / www. britannica. com/ EBchecked/ topic/

158787/ Rene-Descartes). Encyclopdia Britannica (Encyclopdia Britannica Online. Encyclopdia Britannica

Inc). Retrieved 31 March 2012.

Naaman-Zauderer, Noa (2010). Descartes' Deontological Turn: Reason, Will and Virtue in the Later Writings.

Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-76330-1.

External links

Video

Bernard Williams interviewed about Descartes on "Men of ideas" (http:/ / www. youtube. com/

watch?v=44h9QuWcJYk)

Ren Descartes (http:/ / www. findagrave. com/ cgi-bin/ fg. cgi?page=gr& GRid=8404) at Find a Grave

General

Detailed biography of Descartes (http:/ / www-groups. dcs. st-and. ac. uk/ ~history/ Mathematicians/ Descartes.

html)

"Ren Descartes" in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia.

Ren Descartes

57

Descartes featured on the 100 French Franc banknote from 1942. (http:/ / www-personal. umich. edu/ ~jbourj/

money5. htm)

More easily readable versions of Meditations, Objections and Replies, Principles of Philosophy, Discourse on the

Method, Correspondence with Princess Elisabeth, and Passions of the Soul. (http:/ / www. earlymoderntexts. com)

1984 John Cottingham translation of Meditations and Objections and Replies. (http:/ / www. freewebs. com/

dqsdnlj/ d. html)

Ren Descartes (15961650) (http:/ / digitalcommons. unl. edu/ modlangfrench/ 20/ ) Published in Encyclopedia

of Rhetoric and Composition (1996)

Original texts of Ren Descartes in French (http:/ / www. laphilosophie. fr/ livres-de-Descartes-texte-integral.

html) at La Philosophie

Descartes Philosophical Writings tr. by Norman Kemp Smith (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

descartesphiloso010838mbp) at archive.org

Studies in the Cartesian philosophy (1902) by Norman Kemp Smith (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

studiesincartes00smitgoog) at archive.org

The Philosophical Works Of Descartes Volume II (1934) (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

philosophicalwor005524mbp) at archive.org

Works by or about Ren Descartes (http:/ / worldcat. org/ identities/ lccn-n79-61201) in libraries (WorldCat

catalog)

Free scores by Ren Descartes at the International Music Score Library Project

Ren Descartes (15961650): Overview(IEP) (http:/ / www. iep. utm. edu/ descarte/ )

Ren Descartes:The Mind-Body Distinction(IEP) (http:/ / www. iep. utm. edu/ descmind/ )

Cartesian skepticism(DEP) (http:/ / philosophy. uwaterloo. ca/ MindDict/ cartesianskepticism. html)

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Ren Descartes (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes/ )

Descartes' Epistemology (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-epistemology/ )

Descartes' Ethics (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-ethics/ )

Descartes' Life and Works (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-works/ )

Descartes' Modal Metaphysics (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-modal/ )

Descartes' Ontological Argument (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-ontological/ )

Descartes and the Pineal Gland (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ pineal-gland/ )

Descartes' Physics (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-physics/ )

Descartes' Theory of Ideas (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ descartes-ideas/ )

Pierre de Fermat

58

Pierre de Fermat

Pierre de Fermat

Pierre de Fermat

Born 1601 or 1607/8

Beaumont-de-Lomagne, France

Died 1665 Jan 12

Castres, France

Residence France

Nationality French

Fields Mathematics and Law

Knownfor Number theory

Analytic geometry

Fermat's principle

Probability

Fermat's Last Theorem

Adequality

Influences Franois Vite

Pierre de Fermat (French:[pj dfma]; 17

[1]

August 1601 or 1607/8

[2]

12 January 1665) was a French lawyer

at the Parlement of Toulouse, France, and an amateur mathematician who is given credit for early developments that

led to infinitesimal calculus, including his technique of adequality. In particular, he is recognized for his discovery of

an original method of finding the greatest and the smallest ordinates of curved lines, which is analogous to that of the

differential calculus, then unknown, and his research into number theory. He made notable contributions to analytic

geometry, probability, and optics. He is best known for Fermat's Last Theorem, which he described in a note at the

margin of a copy of Diophantus' Arithmetica.

Pierre de Fermat

59

Life and work

Fermat was born in Beaumont-de-Lomagne, Tarn-et-Garonne, France; the late 15th century mansion where Fermat

was born is now a museum. He was of Basque origin. Fermat's father was a wealthy leather merchant and second

consul of Beaumont-de-Lomagne. Pierre had a brother and two sisters and was almost certainly brought up in the

town of his birth. There is little evidence concerning his school education, but it may have been at the local

Franciscan monastery.

Bust in the Salle des Illustres in Capitole de

Toulouse

He attended the University of Toulouse before moving to Bordeaux in

the second half of the 1620s. In Bordeaux he began his first serious

mathematical researches and in 1629 he gave a copy of his restoration

of Apollonius's De Locis Planis to one of the mathematicians there.

Certainly in Bordeaux he was in contact with Beaugrand and during

this time he produced important work on maxima and minima which

he gave to tienne d'Espagnet who clearly shared mathematical

interests with Fermat. There he became much influenced by the work

of Franois Vite.

From Bordeaux, Fermat went to Orlans where he studied law at the

University. He received a degree in civil law before, in 1631, receiving

the title of councillor at the High Court of Judicature in Toulouse,

which he held for the rest of his life. Due to the office he now held he

became entitled to change his name from Pierre Fermat to Pierre de

Fermat. Fluent in Latin, Basque, classical Greek, Italian, and Spanish, Fermat was praised for his written verse in

several languages, and his advice was eagerly sought regarding the emendation of Greek texts.

He communicated most of his work in letters to friends, often with little or no proof of his theorems. This allowed

him to preserve his status as an "amateur" while gaining the recognition he desired. This naturally led to priority

disputes with contemporaries such as Descartes and Wallis. He developed a close relationship with Blaise Pascal.

[3]

Anders Hald writes that, "The basis of Fermat's mathematics was the classical Greek treatises combined with Vieta's

new algebraic methods."

[4]

Work

Fermat's pioneering work in analytic geometry was circulated in manuscript form in 1636, predating the publication

of Descartes' famous La gomtrie. This manuscript was published posthumously in 1679 in "Varia opera

mathematica", as Ad Locos Planos et Solidos Isagoge, ("Introduction to Plane and Solid Loci").

[5]

In Methodus ad disquirendam maximam et minima and in De tangentibus linearum curvarum, Fermat developed a

method for determining maxima, minima, and tangents to various curves that was equivalent to differentiation.

[6]

In

these works, Fermat obtained a technique for finding the centers of gravity of various plane and solid figures, which

led to his further work in quadrature.

Pierre de Fermat

60

Pierre de Fermat

Fermat was the first person known to have evaluated the integral of general

power functions. Using an ingenious trick, he was able to reduce this evaluation

to the sum of geometric series.

[7]

The resulting formula was helpful to Newton,

and then Leibniz, when they independently developed the fundamental theorem

of calculus.

In number theory, Fermat studied Pell's equation, perfect numbers, amicable

numbers and what would later become Fermat numbers. It was while researching

perfect numbers that he discovered the little theorem. He invented a factorization

methodFermat's factorization methodas well as the proof technique of

infinite descent, which he used to prove Fermat's Last Theorem for the case n =

4. Fermat developed the two-square theorem, and the polygonal number theorem,

which states that each number is a sum of three triangular numbers, four square

numbers, five pentagonal numbers, and so on.

Although Fermat claimed to have proved all his arithmetic theorems, few records

of his proofs have survived. Many mathematicians, including Gauss, doubted

several of his claims, especially given the difficulty of some of the problems and

the limited mathematical tools available to Fermat. His famous Last Theorem was first discovered by his son in the

margin on his father's copy of an edition of Diophantus, and included the statement that the margin was too small to

include the proof. He had not bothered to inform even Marin Mersenne of it. It was not proved until 1994 by Sir

Andrew Wiles, using techniques unavailable to Fermat.

Although he carefully studied, and drew inspiration from Diophantus, Fermat began a different tradition. Diophantus

was content to find a single solution to his equations, even if it were an undesired fractional one. Fermat was

interested only in integer solutions to his Diophantine equations, and he looked for all possible general solutions. He

often proved that certain equations had no solution, which usually baffled his contemporaries.

Through his correspondence with Pascal in 1654, Fermat and Pascal helped lay the fundamental groundwork for the

theory of probability. From this brief but productive collaboration on the problem of points, they are now regarded as

joint founders of probability theory.

[8]

Fermat is credited with carrying out the first ever rigorous probability

calculation. In it, he was asked by a professional gambler why if he bet on rolling at least one six in four throws of a

die he won in the long term, whereas betting on throwing at least one double-six in 24 throws of two dice resulted in

his losing. Fermat subsequently proved why this was the case mathematically.

[9]

Fermat's principle of least time (which he used to derive Snell's law in 1657) was the first variational principle

[10]

enunciated in physics since Hero of Alexandria described a principle of least distance in the first century CE. In this

way, Fermat is recognized as a key figure in the historical development of the fundamental principle of least action

in physics. The terms Fermat's principle and Fermat functional were named in recognition of this role.

[11]

Pierre de Fermat

61

Death

Place of burial of Pierre de Fermat in Place Jean

Jaurs, Castres, France. Translation of the plaque:

in this place was buried on January 13, 1665,

Pierre de Fermat, councilor of the chamber of

Edit and mathematician of great renown,

celebrated for his theorem (sic),

a

n

+ b

n

c

n

for n>2

Pierre de Fermat died at Castres, Tarn.

[2]

The oldest and most

prestigious high school in Toulouse is named after him: the Lyce

Pierre de Fermat. French sculptor Thophile Barrau made a marble

statue named Hommage Pierre Fermat as tribute to Fermat, now at

the Capitole of Toulouse.

Assessment of his work

Holographic will handwritten by

Fermat on 4 March 1660 kept at

the Departmental Archives of

Haute-Garonne, in Toulouse

Together with Ren Descartes, Fermat was one of the two leading

mathematicians of the first half of the 17th century. According to Peter L.

Bernstein, in his book Against the Gods, Fermat "was a mathematician of rare

power. He was an independent inventor of analytic geometry, he contributed to

the early development of calculus, he did research on the weight of the earth, and

he worked on light refraction and optics. In the course of what turned out to be

an extended correspondence with Pascal, he made a significant contribution to

the theory of probability. But Fermat's crowning achievement was in the theory

of numbers."

[12]

Regarding Fermat's work in analysis, Isaac Newton wrote that his own early

ideas about calculus came directly from "Fermat's way of drawing tangents."

[13]

Of Fermat's number theoretic work, the great 20th-century mathematician Andr

Weil wrote that "... what we possess of his methods for dealing with curves of

genus 1 is remarkably coherent; it is still the foundation for the modern theory of

such curves. It naturally falls into two parts; the first one ... may conveniently be

termed a method of ascent, in contrast with the descent which is rightly regarded

as Fermat's own."

[14]

Regarding Fermat's use of ascent, Weil continued "The novelty consisted in the vastly extended

use which Fermat made of it, giving him at least a partial equivalent of what we would obtain by the systematic use

of the group theoretical properties of the rational points on a standard cubic."

[15]

With his gift for number relations

and his ability to find proofs for many of his theorems, Fermat essentially created the modern theory of numbers.

Pierre de Fermat

62

Notes

[1] Kek, M.; Luca, Florian; Somer, Lawrence (2001). 17 lectures on Fermat numbers: from number theory to geometry. CMS books in

mathematics. Springer. p.v. ISBN978-0-387-95332-8.

[2] Klaus Barner (2001): How old did Fermat become? (http:/ / cat. inist. fr/ ?aModele=afficheN& cpsidt=14213014) Internationale Zeitschrift

fr Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin. ISSN 0036-6978. Vol 9, No 4, pp. 209-228.

[3] Ball, Walter William Rouse (1888). A short account of the history of mathematics. General Books LLC. ISBN978-1-4432-9487-4.

[4] http:/ / www. ams. org/ notices/ 199507/ faltings. pdf

[5] Gullberg, Jan. Mathematics from the birth of numbers, W. W. Norton & Company; p. 548. ISBN 0-393-04002-X ISBN 978-0393040029

[6] Pellegrino, Dana. "Pierre de Fermat" (http:/ / www.math. rutgers. edu/ ~cherlin/ History/ Papers2000/ pellegrino. html). . Retrieved

2008-02-24.

[7] Parads, Jaume; Pla, Josep; Viader, Pelagr. "Fermats Treatise On Quadrature: A New Reading" (http:/ / papers. ssrn. com/ sol3/ Delivery.

cfm/ SSRN_ID848544_code386779.pdf?abstractid=848544& mirid=5). . Retrieved 2008-02-24

[8] O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F.. "The MacTutor History of Mathematics archive: Pierre de Fermat" (http:/ / www-groups. dcs. st-and. ac. uk/

~history/ Biographies/ Fermat.html). . Retrieved 2008-02-24

[9] Eves, Howard. An Introduction to the History of Mathematics, Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, Texas, 1990.

[10] "Fermats principle for light rays" (http:/ / relativity. livingreviews. org/ open?pubNo=lrr-2004-9& page=articlesu9. html). . Retrieved

2008-02-24.

[11] erven, V. (July 2002). "Fermat's Variational Principle for Anisotropic Inhomogeneous Media" (http:/ / www. ingentaconnect. com/

content/ klu/ sgeg/ 2002/ 00000046/ 00000003/ 00450806). Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 46 (3): 567. doi:10.1023/A:1019599204028. .

[12] Bernstein, Peter L. (1996). Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. John Wiley & Sons. pp.6162. ISBN978-0-471-12104-6.

[13] Simmons, George F. (2007). Calculus Gems: Brief Lives and Memorable Mathematics. Mathematical Association of America. p.98.

ISBN0-88385-561-5.

[14] [14] Weil 1984, p.104

[15] [15] Weil 1984, p.105

Books referenced

Weil, Andr (1984). Number Theory: An approach through history From Hammurapi to Legendre. Birkhuser.

ISBN0-8176-3141-0.

Further reading

Mahoney, Michael Sean (1994). The mathematical career of Pierre de Fermat, 1601 - 1665. Princeton Univ.

Press. ISBN0-691-03666-7.

Singh, Simon (2002). Fermat's Last Theorem. Fourth Estate Ltd. ISBN1-84115-791-0.

External links

Fermat's Achievements (http:/ / fermatslasttheorem. blogspot. com/ 2005/ 05/ fermats-achievements. html)

Fermat's Fallibility (http:/ / www. mathpages. com/ home/ kmath195/ kmath195. htm) at MathPages

History of Fermat's Last Theorem (French) (http:/ / ns33717. ovh. net/ spokus/ default/ EN/ all/ tpe_felix/ )

The Life and times of Pierre de Fermat (1601 - 1665) (http:/ / www. maths. tcd. ie/ pub/ HistMath/ People/

Fermat/ RouseBall/ RB_Fermat. html) from W. W. Rouse Ball's History of Mathematics

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Pierre de Fermat" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Fermat. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

zj:Pierre de Fermat

List of things named after Pierre de Fermat

63

List of things named after Pierre de Fermat

This is a list of things named after Pierre de Fermat, a French amateur mathematician.

This list is incomplete.

Fermat cubic

Fermat number

Fermat polygonal number theorem

Fermat Prize

Fermat pseudoprime

Fermat quotient

Fermat's factorization method

Fermat's principle

Fermat's spiral

Fermat's last theorem

Fermat's little theorem

Fermat's theorem (stationary points)

Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares

Blaise Pascal

64

Blaise Pascal

Blaise Pascal

Born 19 June 1623

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France

Died 19 August 1662 (aged39)

Paris, France

Residence France

Nationality French

Era 17th-century philosophy

Region Western philosophy

Religion Roman Catholic

School Jansenism, precursor to existentialism

Maininterests Theology, mathematics, philosophy, physics

Notableideas Pascal's Wager

Pascal's triangle

Pascal's law

Pascal's theorem

Blaise Pascal (French:[blz paskal]; 19 June 1623 19 August 1662), was a French mathematician, physicist,

inventor, writer and Christian philosopher. He was a child prodigy who was educated by his father, a tax collector in

Rouen. Pascal's earliest work was in the natural and applied sciences where he made important contributions to the

study of fluids, and clarified the concepts of pressure and vacuum by generalizing the work of Evangelista Torricelli.

Pascal also wrote in defense of the scientific method.

In 1642, while still a teenager, he started some pioneering work on calculating machines, and after three years of

effort and 50 prototypes

[1]

he invented the mechanical calculator.

[2][3]

He built 20 of these machines (called pascal's

calculator and later pascaline) in the following ten years.

[4]

Pascal was an important mathematician, helping create

two major new areas of research: he wrote a significant treatise on the subject of projective geometry at the age of

16, and later corresponded with Pierre de Fermat on probability theory, strongly influencing the development of

modern economics and social science. Following Galileo and Torricelli, in 1646 he refuted Aristotle's followers who

insisted that nature abhors a vacuum. Pascal's results caused many disputes before being accepted.

Blaise Pascal

65

In 1646, he and his sister Jacqueline identified with the religious movement within Catholicism known by its

detractors as Jansenism.

[5]

His father died in 1651. Following a mystical experience in late 1654, he had his "second

conversion", abandoned his scientific work, and devoted himself to philosophy and theology. His two most famous

works date from this period: the Lettres provinciales and the Penses, the former set in the conflict between

Jansenists and Jesuits. In this year, he also wrote an important treatise on the arithmetical triangle. Between 1658 and

1659 he wrote on the cycloid and its use in calculating the volume of solids.

Pascal had poor health especially after his 18th year and his death came just two months after his 39th birthday.

[6]

Early life and education

Pascal was born in Clermont-Ferrand; he lost his mother, Antoinette Begon, at the age of three.

[7]

His father, tienne

Pascal (15881651), who also had an interest in science and mathematics, was a local judge and member of the

"Noblesse de Robe". Pascal had two sisters, the younger Jacqueline and the elder Gilberte.

In 1631, five years after the death of his wife,

[8]

tienne Pascal moved with his children to Paris. The newly arrived

family soon hired Louise Delfault, a maid who eventually became an instrumental member of the family. tienne,

who never remarried, decided that he alone would educate his children, for they all showed extraordinary intellectual

ability, particularly his son Blaise. The young Pascal showed an amazing aptitude for mathematics and science.

Particularly of interest to Pascal was a work of Desargues on conic sections. Following Desargues' thinking, the

16-year-old Pascal produced, as a means of proof, a short treatise on what was called the "Mystic Hexagram", Essai

pour les coniques ("Essay on Conics") and sent ithis first serious work of mathematicsto Pre Mersenne in

Paris; it is known still today as Pascal's theorem. It states that if a hexagon is inscribed in a circle (or conic) then the

three intersection points of opposite sides lie on a line (called the Pascal line).

Pascal's work was so precocious that Descartes was convinced that Pascal's father had written it. When assured by

Mersenne that it was, indeed, the product of the son not the father, Descartes dismissed it with a sniff: "I do not find

it strange that he has offered demonstrations about conics more appropriate than those of the ancients," adding, "but

other matters related to this subject can be proposed that would scarcely occur to a 16-year-old child."

[9]

In France at that time offices and positions could beand werebought and sold. In 1631 tienne sold his position

as second president of the Cour des Aides for 65,665 livres.

[10]

The money was invested in a government bond which

provided if not a lavish then certainly a comfortable income which allowed the Pascal family to move to, and enjoy,

Paris. But in 1638 Richelieu, desperate for money to carry on the Thirty Years' War, defaulted on the government's

bonds. Suddenly tienne Pascal's worth had dropped from nearly 66,000 livres to less than 7,300.

An early Pascaline on display at the Muse des

Arts et Mtiers, Paris

Like so many others, tienne was eventually forced to flee Paris

because of his opposition to the fiscal policies of Cardinal Richelieu,

leaving his three children in the care of his neighbor Madame Sainctot,

a great beauty with an infamous past who kept one of the most

glittering and intellectual salons in all France. It was only when

Jacqueline performed well in a children's play with Richelieu in

attendance that tienne was pardoned. In time tienne was back in

good graces with the cardinal, and in 1639 had been appointed the

king's commissioner of taxes in the city of Rouen a city whose tax

records, thanks to uprisings, were in utter chaos.

In 1642, in an effort to ease his father's endless, exhausting calculations, and recalculations, of taxes owed and paid,

Pascal, not yet 19, constructed a mechanical calculator capable of addition and subtraction, called Pascal's calculator

or the Pascaline. The Muse des Arts et Mtiers in Paris and the Zwinger museum in Dresden, Germany, exhibit two

of his original mechanical calculators. Though these machines are early forerunners to computer engineering, the

calculator failed to be a great commercial success. Because it was extraordinarily expensive the Pascaline became

Blaise Pascal

66

little more than a toy, and status symbol, for the very rich both in France and throughout Europe. However, Pascal

continued to make improvements to his design through the next decade and built 20 machines in total.

Contributions to mathematics

Pascal's triangle. Each number is the sum of the

two directly above it. The triangle demonstrates

many mathematical properties in addition to

showing binomial coefficients.

Pascal continued to influence mathematics throughout his life. His

Trait du triangle arithmtique ("Treatise on the Arithmetical

Triangle") of 1653 described a convenient tabular presentation for

binomial coefficients, now called Pascal's triangle. The triangle can

also be represented:

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 2 3 4 5 6

2 1 3 6 10 15

3 1 4 10 20

4 1 5 15

5 1 6

6 1

He defines the numbers in the triangle by recursion: Call the number in the (m+1)st row and (n+1)st column t

mn

.

Then t

mn

= t

m-1,n

+ t

m,n-1

, for m = 0, 1, 2... and n = 0, 1, 2... The boundary conditions are t

m, 1

= 0, t

1, n

for m = 1,

2, 3... and n = 1, 2, 3... The generator t

00

= 1. Pascal concludes with the proof,

In 1654, prompted by a friend interested in gambling problems, he corresponded with Fermat on the subject, and

from that collaboration was born the mathematical theory of probabilities. The friend was the Chevalier de Mr, and

the specific problem was that of two players who want to finish a game early and, given the current circumstances of

the game, want to divide the stakes fairly, based on the chance each has of winning the game from that point. From

this discussion, the notion of expected value was introduced. Pascal later (in the Penses) used a probabilistic

argument, Pascal's Wager, to justify belief in God and a virtuous life. The work done by Fermat and Pascal into the

calculus of probabilities laid important groundwork for Leibniz' formulation of the infinitesimal calculus.

[11]

After a religious experience in 1654, Pascal mostly gave up work in mathematics.

Blaise Pascal

67

Philosophy of mathematics

Pascal's major contribution to the philosophy of mathematics came with his De l'Esprit gomtrique ("Of the

Geometrical Spirit"), originally written as a preface to a geometry textbook for one of the famous "Petites-Ecoles de

Port-Royal" ("Little Schools of Port-Royal"). The work was unpublished until over a century after his death. Here,

Pascal looked into the issue of discovering truths, arguing that the ideal of such a method would be to found all

propositions on already established truths. At the same time, however, he claimed this was impossible because such

established truths would require other truths to back them upfirst principles, therefore, cannot be reached. Based

on this, Pascal argued that the procedure used in geometry was as perfect as possible, with certain principles

assumed and other propositions developed from them. Nevertheless, there was no way to know the assumed

principles to be true.

Pascal also used De l'Esprit gomtrique to develop a theory of definition. He distinguished between definitions

which are conventional labels defined by the writer and definitions which are within the language and understood by

everyone because they naturally designate their referent. The second type would be characteristic of the philosophy

of essentialism. Pascal claimed that only definitions of the first type were important to science and mathematics,

arguing that those fields should adopt the philosophy of formalism as formulated by Descartes.

In De l'Art de persuader ("On the Art of Persuasion"), Pascal looked deeper into geometry's axiomatic method,

specifically the question of how people come to be convinced of the axioms upon which later conclusions are based.

Pascal agreed with Montaigne that achieving certainty in these axioms and conclusions through human methods is

impossible. He asserted that these principles can be grasped only through intuition, and that this fact underscored the

necessity for submission to God in searching out truths.

Contributions to the physical sciences

Portrait of Pascal

Pascal's work in the fields of the study of hydrodynamics and

hydrostatics centered on the principles of hydraulic fluids. His

inventions include the hydraulic press (using hydraulic pressure to

multiply force) and the syringe. He proved that hydrostatic pressure

depends not on the weight of the fluid but on the elevation difference.

He demonstrated this principle by attaching a thin tube to a barrel full

of water and filling the tube with water up to the level of the third floor

of a building. This caused the barrel to leak, in what became known as

Pascal's barrel experiment. By 1646, Pascal had learned of Evangelista

Torricelli's experimentation with barometers. Having replicated an

experiment that involved placing a tube filled with mercury upside

down in a bowl of mercury, Pascal questioned what force kept some

mercury in the tube and what filled the space above the mercury in the

tube. At the time, most scientists contended that, rather than a vacuum,

some invisible matter was present. This was based on the Aristotelian

notion that creation was a thing of substance, whether visible or invisible; and that this substance was forever in

motion. Furthermore, "Everything that is in motion must be moved by something," Aristotle declared.

[12]

Therefore,

to the Aristotelian trained scientists of Pascal's time, a vacuum was an impossibility. How so? As proof it was

pointed out:

Light passed through the so-called "vacuum" in the glass tube.

Blaise Pascal

68

An illustration of Pascal's barrel experiment of

1646

Aristotle wrote how everything moved, and must be moved by

something.

Therefore, since there had to be an invisible "something" to move

the light through the glass tube, there was no vacuum in the tube.

Not in the glass tube or anywhere else. Vacuums the absence of

any and everything were simply an impossibility.

Following more experimentation in this vein, in 1647 Pascal produced

Experiences nouvelles touchant le vide ("New Experiments with the

Vacuum"), which detailed basic rules describing to what degree

various liquids could be supported by air pressure. It also provided

reasons why it was indeed a vacuum above the column of liquid in a

barometer tube.

On 19 September 1648, after many months of Pascal's friendly but

insistent prodding, Florin Prier, husband of Pascal's elder sister

Gilberte, was finally able to carry out the fact-finding mission vital to

Pascal's theory. The account, written by Prier, reads:

"The weather was chancy last Saturday...[but] around five

o'clock that morning...the Puy-de-Dme was visible...so I

decided to give it a try. Several important people of the city of

Clermont had asked me to let them know when I would make the

ascent...I was delighted to have them with me in this great

work...

"...at eight o'clock we met in the gardens of the Minim Fathers, which has the lowest elevation in town....First I

poured 16 pounds of quicksilver...into a vessel...then took several glass tubes...each four feet long and

hermetically sealed at one end and opened at the other...then placed them in the vessel [of quicksilver]...I

found the quick silver stood at 26" and 3 lines above the quicksilver in the vessel...I repeated the experiment

two more times while standing in the same spot...[they] produced the same result each time...

"I attached one of the tubes to the vessel and marked the height of the quicksilver and...asked Father Chastin,

one of the Minim Brothers...to watch if any changes should occur through the day...Taking the other tube and

a portion of the quick silver...I walked to the top of Puy-de-Dme, about 500 fathoms higher than the

monastery, where upon experiment...found that the quicksilver reached a height of only 23" and 2 lines...I

repeated the experiment five times with care...each at different points on the summit...found the same height of

quicksilver...in each case..."

[13]

Pascal replicated the experiment in Paris by carrying a barometer up to the top of the bell tower at the church of

Saint-Jacques-de-la-Boucherie, a height of about fifty meters. The mercury dropped two lines.

In the face of criticism that some invisible matter must exist in Pascal's empty space, Pascal, in his reply to Estienne

Noel, gave one of the 17th century's major statements on the scientific method, which is a striking anticipation of the

idea popularised by Karl Popper that scientific theories are characterised by their falsifiability: "In order to show that

a hypothesis is evident, it does not suffice that all the phenomena follow from it; instead, if it leads to something

contrary to a single one of the phenomena, that suffices to establish its falsity."

[14]

His insistence on the existence of

the vacuum also led to conflict with other prominent scientists, including Descartes.

Pascal introduced a primitive form of roulette and the roulette wheel in the 17th century in his search for a perpetual

motion machine.

[15]

Blaise Pascal

69

Adult life, religion, philosophy, and literature

For after all what is man in nature? A nothing in relation to infinity, all in relation to nothing, a central point

between nothing and all and infinitely far from understanding either. The ends of things and their beginnings

are impregnably concealed from him in an impenetrable secret. He is equally incapable of seeing the

nothingness out of which he was drawn and the infinite in which he is engulfed.

Blaise Pascal, Penses #72

Religious conversion

Pascal studying the cycloid, by

Augustin Pajou, 1785, Louvre

In the winter of 1646, Pascal's 58 year-old father broke his hip when he slipped

and fell on an icy street of Rouen; given the man's age and the state of medicine

in the 17th century, a broken hip could be a very serious condition, perhaps even

fatal. Rouen was home to two of the finest doctors in France: Monsieur Doctor

Deslandes and Monsieur Doctor de La Bouteillerie. The elder Pascal "would not

let anyone other than these men attend him...It was a good choice, for the old

man survived and was able to walk again..."

[16]

But treatment and rehabilitation

took three months, during which time La Bouteillerie and Deslandes had become

household guests.

Both men were followers of Jean Guillebert, proponent of a splinter group from

the main body of Catholic teaching known as Jansenism. This still fairly small

sect was making surprising inroads into the French Catholic community at that

time. It espoused rigorous Augustinism. Blaise spoke with the doctors frequently,

and upon his successful treatment of tienne, borrowed works by Jansenist

authors from them. In this period, Pascal experienced a sort of "first conversion"

and began to write on theological subjects in the course of the following year.

Pascal fell away from this initial religious engagement and experienced a few years of what some biographers have

called his "worldly period" (164854). His father died in 1651 and left his inheritance to Pascal and Jacqueline, of

which Pascal acted as her conservator. Jacqueline announced that she would soon become a postulant in the

Jansenist convent of Port-Royal. Pascal was deeply affected and very sad, not because of her choice, but because of

his chronic poor health; he too needed her.

"Suddenly there was war in the Pascal household. Blaise pleaded with Jacqueline not to leave, but she was

adamant. He commanded her to stay, but that didn't work, either. At the heart of this was...Blaise's fear of

abandonment...if Jacqueline entered Port-Royal, she would have to leave her inheritance behind...[but] nothing

would change her mind."

[17]

By the end of October in 1651, a truce had been reached between brother and sister. In return for a healthy annual

stipend, Jacqueline signed over her part of the inheritance to her brother. Gilberte had already been given her

inheritance in the form of a dowry. In early January, Jacqueline left for Port-Royal. On that day, according to

Gilberte concerning her brother, "He retired very sadly to his rooms without seeing Jacqueline, who was waiting in

the little parlor..."

[18]

In early June 1653, after what must have seemed like endless badgering from Jacqueline,

Pascal formally signed over the whole of his sister's inheritance to Port-Royal, which, to him, "had begun to smell

like a cult."

[19]

With two-thirds of his father's estate now gone, the 29 year old Pascal was now consigned to genteel

poverty.

For a while, Pascal pursued the life of a bachelor. During visits to his sister at Port-Royal in 1654, he displayed

contempt for affairs of the world but was not drawn to God.

[20]

Blaise Pascal

70

Brush with death

On 23 November 1654, between 10:30 and 12:30 at night, Pascal had an intense religious vision and immediately

recorded the experience in a brief note to himself which began: "Fire. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob,

not of the philosophers and the scholars..." and concluded by quoting Psalm 119:16: "I will not forget thy word.

Amen." He seems to have carefully sewn this document into his coat and always transferred it when he changed

clothes; a servant discovered it only by chance after his death.

[21]

This piece is now known as the Memorial. The

story of the carriage accident as having led to the experience described in the Memorial is disputed by some

scholars.

[22]

His belief and religious commitment revitalized, Pascal visited the older of two convents at Port-Royal

for a two-week retreat in January 1655. For the next four years, he regularly travelled between Port-Royal and Paris.

It was at this point immediately after his conversion when he began writing his first major literary work on religion,

the Provincial Letters.

The Provincial Letters

Beginning in 1656, Pascal published his memorable attack on casuistry, a popular ethical method used by Catholic

thinkers in the early modern period (especially the Jesuits, and in particular Antonio Escobar). Pascal denounced

casuistry as the mere use of complex reasoning to justify moral laxity and all sorts of sins. The 18-letter series was

published between 1656 and 1657 under the pseudonym Louis de Montalte and incensed Louis XIV. The king

ordered that the book be shredded and burnt in 1660. In 1661, in the midsts of the formulary controversy, the

Jansenist school at Port-Royal was condemned and closed down; those involved with the school had to sign a 1656

papal bull condemning the teachings of Jansen as heretical. The final letter from Pascal, in 1657, had defied

Alexander VII himself. Even Pope Alexander, while publicly opposing them, nonetheless was persuaded by Pascal's

arguments.

Aside from their religious influence, the Provincial Letters were popular as a literary work. Pascal's use of humor,

mockery, and vicious satire in his arguments made the letters ripe for public consumption, and influenced the prose

of later French writers like Voltaire and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

Wide praise has been given to the Provincial Letters.

The Penses

Pascal's most influential theological work, referred to posthumously as the Penses ("Thoughts"), was not completed

before his death. It was to have been a sustained and coherent examination and defense of the Christian faith, with

the original title Apologie de la religion Chrtienne ("Defense of the Christian Religion"). The first version of the

numerous scraps of paper found after his death appeared in print as a book in 1669 titled Penses de M. Pascal sur la

religion, et sur quelques autres sujets ("Thoughts of M. Pascal on religion, and on some other subjects") and soon

thereafter became a classic. One of the Apologie's main strategies was to use the contradictory philosophies of

skepticism and stoicism, personalized by Montaigne on one hand, and Epictetus on the other, in order to bring the

unbeliever to such despair and confusion that he would embrace God.

Pascal's Penses is widely considered to be a masterpiece, and a landmark in French prose. When commenting on

one particular section (Thought #72), Sainte-Beuve praised it as the finest pages in the French language.

[23]

Will

Durant hailed it as "the most eloquent book in French prose."

[24]

In Penses, Pascal surveys several philosophical

paradoxes: infinity and nothing, faith and reason, soul and matter, death and life, meaning and vanityseemingly

arriving at no definitive conclusions besides humility, ignorance, and grace. Rolling these into one he develops

Pascal's Wager.

Blaise Pascal

71

Last works and death

Pascal's epitaph in Saint-tienne-du-Mont, where

he was buried

T. S. Eliot described him during this phase of his life as "a man of the

world among ascetics, and an ascetic among men of the world."

Pascal's ascetic lifestyle derived from a belief that it was natural and

necessary for a person to suffer. In 1659, Pascal fell seriously ill.

During his last years, he frequently tried to reject the ministrations of

his doctors, saying, "Sickness is the natural state of Christians."

[25]

Louis XIV suppressed the Jansenist movement at Port-Royal in 1661.

In response, Pascal wrote one of his final works, crit sur la signature

du formulaire ("Writ on the Signing of the Form"), exhorting the

Jansenists not to give in. Later that year, his sister Jacqueline died,

which convinced Pascal to cease his polemics on Jansenism. Pascal's

last major achievement, returning to his mechanical genius, was

inaugurating perhaps the first bus line, moving passengers within Paris

in a carriage with many seats.

In 1662, Pascal's illness became more violent, and his emotional

condition had severely worsened since his sister's death, which

happened the previous year. Aware that his health was fading quickly,

he sought a move to the hospital for incurable diseases, but his doctors

declared that he was too unstable to be carried. In Paris on 18 August 1662, Pascal went into convulsions and

received extreme unction. He died the next morning, his last words being "May God never abandon me," and was

buried in the cemetery of Saint-tienne-du-Mont.

[25]

An autopsy performed after his death revealed grave problems with his stomach and other organs of his abdomen,

along with damage to his brain. Despite the autopsy, the cause of his poor health was never precisely determined,

though speculation focuses on tuberculosis, stomach cancer, or a combination of the two.

[26]

The headaches which

afflicted Pascal are generally attributed to his brain lesion.

Legacy

Death mask of Blaise Pascal.

In honor of his scientific contributions, the name Pascal has been

given to the SI unit of pressure, to a programming language, and

Pascal's law (an important principle of hydrostatics), and as mentioned

above, Pascal's triangle and Pascal's wager still bear his name.

Pascal's development of probability theory was his most influential

contribution to mathematics.

[27]

Originally applied to gambling, today

it is extremely important in economics, especially in actuarial science.

John Ross writes, "Probability theory and the discoveries following it

changed the way we regard uncertainty, risk, decision-making, and an

individual's and society's ability to influence the course of future

events."

[28]

However, it should be noted that Pascal and Fermat,

though doing important early work in probability theory, did not

develop the field very far. Christiaan Huygens, learning of the subject

from the correspondence of Pascal and Fermat, wrote the first book on

the subject. Later figures who continued the development of the theory include Abraham de Moivre and

Pierre-Simon Laplace.

Blaise Pascal

72

In literature, Pascal is regarded as one of the most important authors of the French Classical Period and is read today

as one of the greatest masters of French prose. His use of satire and wit influenced later polemicists. The content of

his literary work is best remembered for its strong opposition to the rationalism of Ren Descartes and simultaneous

assertion that the main countervailing philosophy, empiricism, was also insufficient for determining major truths.

In France, prestigious annual awards, Blaise Pascal Chairs are given to outstanding international scientists to conduct

their research in the Ile de France region.

[29]

One of the Universities of Clermont-Ferrand, France Universit

Blaise Pascal is named after him. The University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, holds an annual math contest

named in his honour.

[30]

Roberto Rossellini directed a filmed biopic (entitled Blaise Pascal) which originally aired on Italian television in

1971. Pascal was a subject of the first edition of the 1984 BBC Two documentary, Sea of Faith, presented by Don

Cupitt.

Works

Essai pour les coniques (1639)

Experiences nouvelles touchant le vide (1647)

Trait du triangle arithmtique (1653)

Lettres provinciales (165657)

De l'Esprit gomtrique (1657 or 1658)

crit sur la signature du formulaire (1661)

Penses (incomplete at death)

References

[1] (fr) La Machine darithmtique, Blaise Pascal (http:/ / fr. wikisource. org/ wiki/ La_Machine_darithmtique), Wikisource

[2] Marguin, Jean (1994) (in fr). Histoire des instruments et machines calculer, trois sicles de mcanique pensante 16421942. Hermann.

p.48. ISBN978-2-7056-6166-3.

[3] d'Ocagne, Maurice (1893) (in fr). Le calcul simplifi (http:/ / cnum. cnam. fr/ CGI/ fpage. cgi?8KU54-2. 5/ 248/ 150/ 369/ 363/ 369).

Gauthier-Villars et fils. p.245. .

[4] Mourlevat, Guy (1988) (in fr). Les machines arithmtiques de Blaise Pascal. Clermont-Ferrand: La Franaise d'Edition et d'Imprimerie. p.12.

[5] "Blaise Pascal" (http:/ / www. newadvent. org/ cathen/ 11511a. htm). Catholic Encyclopedia. . Retrieved 2009-02-23.

[6] Hald, Anders A History of Probability and Statistics and Its Applications before 1750, (Wiley Publications, 1990) pp.44

[7] Devlin, Keith, The Unfinished Game: Pascal, Fermat, and the Seventeenth-Century Letter that Made the World Modern, Basic Books; 1

edition (2008), ISBN 978-0-465-00910-7, p. 20.

[8] O'Connor, J.J.; Robertson, E.F. (August 2006). "tienne Pascal" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/ Biographies/ Pascal_Etienne.

html). University of St. Andrews, Scotland. . Retrieved 5 February 2010.

[9] The Story of Civilization: Volume 8, "The Age of Louis XIV" by Will & Ariel Durant; chapter II, subsection 4.1 p.56)

[10] Connor, James A., Pascal's wager: the man who played dice with God (HarperCollins, NY, 2006) ISBN 0-06-076691-3 p. 42

[11] "The Mathematical Leibniz" (http:/ / www.math.rutgers. edu/ courses/ 436/ Honors02/ leibniz. html). Math.rutgers.edu. . Retrieved

2009-08-16.

[12] Aristotle, Physics, VII, 1.

[13] Prier to Pascal, 22 September 1648, Pascal, Blaise. Oeuvres compltes. (Paris: Seuil, 1960), 2:682.

[14] Pour faire qu'une hypothse soit vidente, il ne suffit pas que tous les phnomnes s'en ensuivent, au lieu que, s'il s'ensuit quelque chose de

contraire un seul des phnomnes, cela suffit pour assurer de sa fausset, in Les Lettres de Blaise Pascal: Accompagnes de Lettres de ses

Correspondants Publies, ed. Maurice Beaufreton, 6th edition (Paris: G. Crs, 1922), 2526, available at http:/ / gallica. bnf. fr and translated

in Saul Fisher, Pierre Gassendi's Philosophy and Science: Atomism for Empiricists Brill's Studies in Intellectual History 131 (Leiden: E. J.

Brill, 2005), 126 n.7

[15] MIT, "Inventor of the Week Archive: Pascal : Mechanical Calculator" (http:/ / web. mit. edu/ invent/ iow/ pascal. html), May 2003. "Pascal

worked on many versions of the devices, leading to his attempt to create a perpetual motion machine. He has been credited with introducing

the roulette machine, which was a by-product of these experiments."

[16] Connor, James A., Pascal's wager: the man who played dice with God (HarperCollins, NY, 2006) ISBN 0-06-076691-3 p. 70

[17] Miel, Jan. Pascal and Theology. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969), p. 122

[18] Jacqueline Pascal, "Memoir" p. 87

[19] Miel, Jan. Pascal and Theology. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969), p. 124

Blaise Pascal

73

[20] Richard H. Popkin, Paul Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1967 edition, s.v. "Pascal, Blaise.", vol. 6, p. 5255, New York:

Macmillan

[21] Pascal, Blaise. Oeuvres compltes. (Paris: Seuil, 1960), p. 618

[22] MathPages, Hold Your Horses (http:/ / www.mathpages. com/ home/ kmath558/ kmath558. htm)

[23] Sainte-Beuve, Seventeenth Century (http:/ / books.google. com/ books?id=I0P0A8XK29QC& pg=PA167) ISBN 1-113-16675-4 p. 174

(2009 reprint).

[24] The Story of Civilization: Volume 8, "The Age of Louis XIV" by Will & Ariel Durant, chapter II, Subsection 4.4, p. 66 ISBN 1-56731-019-2

[25] Muir, Jane. Of Men and Numbers (http:/ / books.google. com/ books?id=uV3rJkmnQhsC& printsec=frontcover). (New York: Dover

Publications, Inc, 1996). ISBN 0-486-28973-7, p. 104.

[26] Muir, Jane. Of Men and Numbers (http:/ / books.google. com/ books?id=uV3rJkmnQhsC& printsec=frontcover). (New York: Dover

Publications, Inc, 1996). ISBN 0-486-28973-7, p. 103.

[27] "Blaise Pascal" (http:/ / www. famousscientists. org/ blaise-pascal). FamousScientists.org. . Retrieved 2011-12-15.

[28] Ross, John F. (2004). "Pascal's legacy". EMBO Reports 5 (Suppl 1): S7S10. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400229. PMC1299210.

PMID15459727.

[29] "Chaires Blaise Pascal" (http:/ / www.chaires-blaise-pascal. org/ uk/ index. html). Chaires Blaise Pascal. . Retrieved 2009-08-16.

[30] "CEMC Pascal, Cayley and Fermat Mathematics Contests University of Waterloo" (http:/ / www. cemc. uwaterloo. ca/ contests/ pcf.

html). Cemc.uwaterloo.ca. 2008-06-23. . Retrieved 2009-08-16.

Further reading

Adamson, Donald. Blaise Pascal: Mathematician, Physicist, and Thinker about God (1995) ISBN 0-333-55036-6

Adamson, Donald. "Pascal's Views on Mathematics and the Divine," (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=AMOQZfrZq-EC& pg=PA405) Mathematics and the Divine: A Historical Study (eds. T. Koetsier and

L. Bergmans. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2005), pp.40721.

Broome, J.H. Pascal. (London: E. Arnold, 1965). ISBN 0-7131-5021-1

Davidson, Hugh M. Blaise Pascal. (Boston: Twayne Publishers), 1983.

Farrell, John. "Pascal and Power". Chapter seven of Paranoia and Modernity: Cervantes to Rousseau (Cornell

UP, 2006).

Goldmann, Lucien, The hidden God; a study of tragic vision in the Pensees of Pascal and the tragedies of Racine

(original ed. 1955, Trans. Philip Thody. London: Routledge, 1964).

Jordan, Jeff. Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006).

Landkildehus, Sren. "Kierkegaard and Pascal as kindred spirits in the Fight against Christendom" in

Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions (ed. Jon Stewart. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2009).

Mackie, John Leslie. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. (Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 1982).

Saka, Paul (2001). "Pascal's Wager and the Many Gods Objection". Religious Studies 37 (3): 32141.

doi:10.1017/S0034412501005686.

Stephen, Leslie. "Pascal" (in English). Studies of a Biographer. 2. London: Duckworth and Co.. p.241284.

Tobin, Paul. "The Rejection of Pascal's Wager: A Skeptic's Guide to the Bible and the Historical Jesus".

authorsonline.co.uk, 2009.

Yves Morvan, Pascal Mirefleurs ? Les dessins de la maison de Domat, Impr. Blandin, 1985.(FRBNF40378895)

Blaise Pascal

74

External links

Pascal's Memorial (http:/ / www. users. csbsju. edu/ ~eknuth/ pascal. html) in orig. French/Latin and modern

English, trans. Elizabeth T. Knuth.

Biography, Bibliography. (http:/ / www. biblioweb. org/ -PASCAL-Blaise-. html) (in French)

Works by Blaise Pascal (http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ author/ Pascal+ Blaise) at Project Gutenberg

Works by Blaise Pascal on Open Library at the Internet Archive

Blaise Pascal featured on the 500 French Franc banknote in 1977. (http:/ / www-personal. umich. edu/ ~jbourj/

money5. htm)

Blaise Pascal's works (http:/ / www. intratext. com/ Catalogo/ Autori/ Aut852. htm): text, concordances and

frequency lists

"Blaise Pascal". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1913.

Etext of Pascal's Penses (http:/ / www. ccel. org/ ccel/ pascal/ pensees. html) (English, in various formats)

Etext of Pascal's Lettres Provinciales (http:/ / oregonstate. edu/ instruct/ phl302/ texts/ pascal/ letters-a. html)

(English)

Etext of a number of Pascal's minor works (http:/ / www. bartleby. com/ 48/ 3/ ) (English translation) including,

De l'Esprit gomtrique and De l'Art de persuader.

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Blaise Pascal" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Pascal. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

Isaac Newton

75

Isaac Newton

Sir Isaac Newton

Godfrey Kneller's 1689 portrait of Isaac Newton (age 46).

Born

25 December 1642

[NS: 4 January 1643]

[1]

Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, Lincolnshire, England

Died

20 March 1726 (aged 83)

[OS: 20 March 1726

NS: 31 March 1727]

[1]

Kensington, Middlesex, England

Resting place Westminster Abbey

Residence England

Nationality English (later British)

Fields

Physics

Natural philosophy

Mathematics

Astronomy

Alchemy

Christian theology

Institutions University of Cambridge

Royal Society

Royal Mint

Alma mater Trinity College, Cambridge

Academic advisors

Isaac Barrow

[2]

Benjamin Pulleyn

[3][4]

Notable students Roger Cotes

William Whiston

Isaac Newton

76

Knownfor Newtonian mechanics

Universal gravitation

Infinitesimal calculus

Optics

Binomial series

Principia

Newton's method

Influences

Henry More

[5]

Polish Brethren

[6]

Robert Boyle

[7]

Influenced Nicolas Fatio de Duillier

John Keill

Signature

Sir Isaac Newton PRS MP (25 December 1642 20 March 1726) was an English physicist, mathematician,

astronomer, natural philosopher, alchemist and theologian, who has been considered by many to be the greatest and

most influential scientist who ever lived.

[8][9]

His monograph Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica,

published in 1687, laid the foundations for most of classical mechanics. In this work, Newton described universal

gravitation and the three laws of motion, which dominated the scientific view of the physical universe for the next

three centuries. Newton showed that the motion of objects on Earth and that of celestial bodies is governed by the

same set of natural laws: by demonstrating the consistency between Kepler's laws of planetary motion and his theory

of gravitation he removed the last doubts about heliocentrism and advanced the scientific revolution. The Principia

is generally considered to be one of the most important scientific books ever written, both due to the specific

physical laws the work successfully described, and for its style, which assisted in setting standards for scientific

publication down to the present time.

Newton built the first practical reflecting telescope

[10]

and developed a theory of colour based on the observation that

a prism decomposes white light into the many colours that form the visible spectrum. He also formulated an

empirical law of cooling and studied the speed of sound. In mathematics, Newton shares the credit with Gottfried

Leibniz for the development of differential and integral calculus. He generalised the binomial theorem to non-integer

exponents, developed Newton's method for approximating the roots of a function, and contributed to the study of

power series.

Although an unorthodox Christian, Newton was deeply religious and his occult studies took up a substantial part of

his life. He secretly rejected Trinitarianism and refused holy orders.

[11]

Life

Early life

Isaac Newton was born (according to the Julian calendar in use in England at the time) on Christmas Day, 25

December 1642, (NS 4 January 1643.

[1]

) at Woolsthorpe Manor in Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, a hamlet in the

county of Lincolnshire. He was born three months after the death of his father, a prosperous farmer also named Isaac

Newton. Born prematurely, he was a small child; his mother Hannah Ayscough reportedly said that he could have fit

inside a quart mug ( 1.1 litres). When Newton was three, his mother remarried and went to live with her new

husband, the Reverend Barnabus Smith, leaving her son in the care of his maternal grandmother, Margery Ayscough.

The young Isaac disliked his stepfather and maintained some enmity towards his mother for marrying him, as

revealed by this entry in a list of sins committed up to the age of 19: "Threatening my father and mother Smith to

Isaac Newton

77

burn them and the house over them."

[12]

Although it was claimed that he was once engaged,

[13]

Newton never

married.

Newton in a 1702 portrait by

Godfrey Kneller

Isaac Newton (Bolton, Sarah K.

Famous Men of Science. NY: Thomas

Y. Crowell & Co., 1889)

From the age of about twelve until he was seventeen, Newton was educated at

The King's School, Grantham. He was removed from school, and by October

1659, he was to be found at Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, where his mother,

widowed by now for a second time, attempted to make a farmer of him. He hated

farming.

[14]

Henry Stokes, master at the King's School, persuaded his mother to

send him back to school so that he might complete his education. Motivated

partly by a desire for revenge against a schoolyard bully, he became the

top-ranked student.

[15]

The Cambridge psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen

considers it "fairly certain" that Newton had Asperger syndrome.

[16]

In June 1661, he was admitted to Trinity College, Cambridge as a sizar a sort

of work-study role.

[17]

At that time, the college's teachings were based on those

of Aristotle, whom Newton supplemented with modern philosophers, such as

Descartes, and astronomers such as Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler. In 1665, he

discovered the generalised binomial theorem and began to develop a

mathematical theory that later became infinitesimal calculus. Soon after Newton

had obtained his degree in August 1665, the university temporarily closed as a

precaution against the Great Plague. Although he had been undistinguished as a

Cambridge student,

[18]

Newton's private studies at his home in Woolsthorpe over

the subsequent two years saw the development of his theories on calculus,

[19]

optics and the law of gravitation. In 1667, he returned to Cambridge as a fellow

of Trinity.

[20]

Fellows were required to become ordained priests, something

Newton desired to avoid due to his unorthodox views. Luckily for Newton, there

was no specific deadline for ordination, and it could be postponed indefinitely.

The problem became more severe later when Newton was elected for the

prestigious Lucasian Chair. For such a significant appointment, ordaining

normally could not be dodged. Nevertheless, Newton managed to avoid it by

means of a special permission from Charles II (see "Middle years" section

below).

Middle years

Mathematics

Newton's work has been said "to distinctly advance every branch of mathematics then studied".

[21]

His work on the

subject usually referred to as fluxions or calculus, seen in a manuscript of October 1666, is now published among

Newton's mathematical papers.

[22]

The author of the manuscript De analysi per aequationes numero terminorum

infinitas, sent by Isaac Barrow to John Collins in June 1669, was identified by Barrow in a letter sent to Collins in

August of that year as:

[23]

Mr Newton, a fellow of our College, and very young... but of an extraordinary genius and proficiency in these

things.

Newton later became involved in a dispute with Leibniz over priority in the development of infinitesimal calculus

(the LeibnizNewton calculus controversy). Most modern historians believe that Newton and Leibniz developed

infinitesimal calculus independently, although with very different notations. Occasionally it has been suggested that

Newton published almost nothing about it until 1693, and did not give a full account until 1704, while Leibniz began

publishing a full account of his methods in 1684. (Leibniz's notation and "differential Method", nowadays recognised

Isaac Newton

78

as much more convenient notations, were adopted by continental European mathematicians, and after 1820 or so,

also by British mathematicians.) Such a suggestion, however, fails to notice the content of calculus which critics of

Newton's time and modern times have pointed out in Book 1 of Newton's Principia itself (published 1687) and in its

forerunner manuscripts, such as De motu corporum in gyrum ("On the motion of bodies in orbit"), of 1684. The

Principia is not written in the language of calculus either as we know it or as Newton's (later) 'dot' notation would

write it. But his work extensively uses an infinitesimal calculus in geometric form, based on limiting values of the

ratios of vanishing small quantities: in the Principia itself Newton gave demonstration of this under the name of 'the

method of first and last ratios'

[24]

and explained why he put his expositions in this form,

[25]

remarking also that

'hereby the same thing is performed as by the method of indivisibles'.

Because of this, the Principia has been called "a book dense with the theory and application of the infinitesimal

calculus" in modern times

[26]

and "lequel est presque tout de ce calcul" ('nearly all of it is of this calculus') in

Newton's time.

[27]

His use of methods involving "one or more orders of the infinitesimally small" is present in his De

motu corporum in gyrum of 1684

[28]

and in his papers on motion "during the two decades preceding 1684".

[29]

Newton had been reluctant to publish his calculus because he feared controversy and criticism.

[30]

He was close to

the Swiss mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier. In 1691, Duillier started to write a new version of Newton's

Principia, and corresponded with Leibniz.

[31]

In 1693 the relationship between Duillier and Newton deteriorated,

and the book was never completed.

Starting in 1699, other members of the Royal Society (of which Newton was a member) accused Leibniz of

plagiarism, and the dispute broke out in full force in 1711. The Royal Society proclaimed in a study that it was

Newton who was the true discoverer and labelled Leibniz a fraud. This study was cast into doubt when it was later

found that Newton himself wrote the study's concluding remarks on Leibniz. Thus began the bitter controversy

which marred the lives of both Newton and Leibniz until the latter's death in 1716.

[32]

Newton is generally credited with the generalised binomial theorem, valid for any exponent. He discovered Newton's

identities, Newton's method, classified cubic plane curves (polynomials of degree three in two variables), made

substantial contributions to the theory of finite differences, and was the first to use fractional indices and to employ

coordinate geometry to derive solutions to Diophantine equations. He approximated partial sums of the harmonic

series by logarithms (a precursor to Euler's summation formula), and was the first to use power series with

confidence and to revert power series. Newton's work on infinite series was inspired by Simon Stevin's decimals.

[33]

He was appointed Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in 1669 on Barrow's recommendation. In that day, any fellow

of Cambridge or Oxford was required to become an ordained Anglican priest. However, the terms of the Lucasian

professorship required that the holder not be active in the church (presumably so as to have more time for science).

Newton argued that this should exempt him from the ordination requirement, and Charles II, whose permission was

needed, accepted this argument. Thus a conflict between Newton's religious views and Anglican orthodoxy was

averted.

[34]

Isaac Newton

79

Optics

A replica of Newton's second Reflecting

telescope that he presented to the Royal Society

in 1672

[35]

From 1670 to 1672, Newton lectured on optics.

[36]

During this period

he investigated the refraction of light, demonstrating that a prism could

decompose white light into a spectrum of colours, and that a lens and a

second prism could recompose the multicoloured spectrum into white

light.

[37]

Modern scholarship has revealed that Newton's analysis and

resynthesis of white light owes a debt to corpuscular alchemy.

[38]

He also showed that the coloured light does not change its properties

by separating out a coloured beam and shining it on various objects.

Newton noted that regardless of whether it was reflected or scattered or

transmitted, it stayed the same colour. Thus, he observed that colour is

the result of objects interacting with already-coloured light rather than

objects generating the colour themselves. This is known as Newton's

theory of colour.

[39]

Illustration of a dispersive prism decomposing white light into the

colours of the spectrum, as discovered by Newton

From this work, he concluded that the lens of any

refracting telescope would suffer from the dispersion of

light into colours (chromatic aberration). As a proof of

the concept, he constructed a telescope using a mirror

as the objective to bypass that problem.

[40]

Building the

design, the first known functional reflecting telescope,

today known as a Newtonian telescope,

[40]

involved

solving the problem of a suitable mirror material and

shaping technique. Newton ground his own mirrors out

of a custom composition of highly reflective speculum

metal, using Newton's rings to judge the quality of the

optics for his telescopes. In late 1668

[41]

he was able to

produce this first reflecting telescope. In 1671, the

Royal Society asked for a demonstration of his

reflecting telescope.

[42]

Their interest encouraged him

to publish his notes On Colour, which he later expanded into his Opticks. When Robert Hooke criticised some of

Newton's ideas, Newton was so offended that he withdrew from public debate. Newton and Hooke had brief

exchanges in 167980, when Hooke, appointed to manage the Royal Society's correspondence, opened up a

correspondence intended to elicit contributions from Newton to Royal Society transactions,

[43]

which had the effect

of stimulating Newton to work out a proof that the elliptical form of planetary orbits would result from a centripetal

force inversely proportional to the square of the radius vector (see Newton's law of universal gravitation History

and De motu corporum in gyrum). But the two men remained generally on poor terms until Hooke's death.

[44]

Isaac Newton

80

Facsimile of a 1682 letter from Isaac Newton to

Dr William Briggs, commenting on Briggs' "A

New Theory of Vision".

Newton argued that light is composed of particles or corpuscles, which

were refracted by accelerating into a denser medium. He verged on

soundlike waves to explain the repeated pattern of reflection and

transmission by thin films (Opticks Bk.II, Props. 12), but still retained

his theory of 'fits' that disposed corpuscles to be reflected or

transmitted (Props.13). Later physicists instead favoured a purely

wavelike explanation of light to account for the interference patterns,

and the general phenomenon of diffraction. Today's quantum

mechanics, photons and the idea of waveparticle duality bear only a

minor resemblance to Newton's understanding of light.

In his Hypothesis of Light of 1675, Newton posited the existence of the

ether to transmit forces between particles. The contact with the

theosophist Henry More, revived his interest in alchemy. He replaced

the ether with occult forces based on Hermetic ideas of attraction and

repulsion between particles. John Maynard Keynes, who acquired

many of Newton's writings on alchemy, stated that "Newton was not

the first of the age of reason: He was the last of the magicians."

[45]

Newton's interest in alchemy cannot be isolated from his contributions

to science.

[5]

This was at a time when there was no clear distinction

between alchemy and science. Had he not relied on the occult idea of action at a distance, across a vacuum, he might

not have developed his theory of gravity. (See also Isaac Newton's occult studies.)

In 1704, Newton published Opticks, in which he expounded his corpuscular theory of light. He considered light to be

made up of extremely subtle corpuscles, that ordinary matter was made of grosser corpuscles and speculated that

through a kind of alchemical transmutation "Are not gross Bodies and Light convertible into one another, ...and may

not Bodies receive much of their Activity from the Particles of Light which enter their Composition?"

[46]

Newton

also constructed a primitive form of a frictional electrostatic generator, using a glass globe (Optics, 8th Query).

In an article entitled "Newton, prisms, and the 'opticks' of tunable lasers

[47]

it is indicated that Newton in his book

Opticks was the first to show a diagram using a prism as a beam expander. In the same book he describes, via

diagrams, the use of multiple-prism arrays. Some 278 years after Newton's discussion, multiple-prism beam

expanders became central to the development of narrow-linewidth tunable lasers. Also, the use of these prismatic

beam expanders led to the multiple-prism dispersion theory.

[47]

Mechanics and gravitation

Newton's own copy of his Principia, with

hand-written corrections for the second edition

In 1679, Newton returned to his work on (celestial) mechanics, i.e.,

gravitation and its effect on the orbits of planets, with reference to

Kepler's laws of planetary motion. This followed stimulation by a brief

exchange of letters in 167980 with Hooke, who had been appointed to

manage the Royal Society's correspondence, and who opened a

correspondence intended to elicit contributions from Newton to Royal

Society transactions.

[43]

Newton's reawakening interest in astronomical

matters received further stimulus by the appearance of a comet in the

winter of 16801681, on which he corresponded with John

Flamsteed.

[48]

After the exchanges with Hooke, Newton worked out a

proof that the elliptical form of planetary orbits would result from a

Isaac Newton

81

centripetal force inversely proportional to the square of the radius vector (see Newton's law of universal gravitation

History and De motu corporum in gyrum). Newton communicated his results to Edmond Halley and to the Royal

Society in De motu corporum in gyrum, a tract written on about 9 sheets which was copied into the Royal Society's

Register Book in December 1684.

[49]

This tract contained the nucleus that Newton developed and expanded to form

the Principia.

The Principia was published on 5 July 1687 with encouragement and financial help from Edmond Halley. In this

work, Newton stated the three universal laws of motion that enabled many of the advances of the Industrial

Revolution which soon followed and were not to be improved upon for more than 200 years, and are still the

underpinnings of the non-relativistic technologies of the modern world. He used the Latin word gravitas (weight) for

the effect that would become known as gravity, and defined the law of universal gravitation.

In the same work, Newton presented a calculus-like method of geometrical analysis by 'first and last ratios', gave the

first analytical determination (based on Boyle's law) of the speed of sound in air, inferred the oblateness of the

spheroidal figure of the Earth, accounted for the precession of the equinoxes as a result of the Moon's gravitational

attraction on the Earth's oblateness, initiated the gravitational study of the irregularities in the motion of the moon,

provided a theory for the determination of the orbits of comets, and much more.

Newton made clear his heliocentric view of the solar system developed in a somewhat modern way, because

already in the mid-1680s he recognised the "deviation of the Sun" from the centre of gravity of the solar system.

[50]

For Newton, it was not precisely the centre of the Sun or any other body that could be considered at rest, but rather

"the common centre of gravity of the Earth, the Sun and all the Planets is to be esteem'd the Centre of the World",

and this centre of gravity "either is at rest or moves uniformly forward in a right line" (Newton adopted the "at rest"

alternative in view of common consent that the centre, wherever it was, was at rest).

[51]

Newton's postulate of an invisible force able to act over vast distances led to him being criticised for introducing

"occult agencies" into science.

[52]

Later, in the second edition of the Principia (1713), Newton firmly rejected such

criticisms in a concluding General Scholium, writing that it was enough that the phenomena implied a gravitational

attraction, as they did; but they did not so far indicate its cause, and it was both unnecessary and improper to frame

hypotheses of things that were not implied by the phenomena. (Here Newton used what became his famous

expression "hypotheses non fingo"

[53]

).

With the Principia, Newton became internationally recognised.

[54]

He acquired a circle of admirers, including the

Swiss-born mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, with whom he formed an intense relationship. This abruptly

ended in 1693, and at the same time Newton suffered a nervous breakdown.

[55]

Classification of cubics

Besides the work of Newton and others on calculus, the first important demonstration of the power of analytic

geometry was Newton's classification of cubic curves in the Euclidean plane in the late 1600s. He divided them into

four types, satisfying different equations, and in 1717 Stirling, probably with Newton's help, proved that every cubic

was one of these four. Newton also claimed that the four types could be obtained by plane projection from one of

them, and this was proved in 1731.

[56]

Isaac Newton

82

Later life

Isaac Newton in old age in 1712,

portrait by Sir James Thornhill

In the 1690s, Newton wrote a number of religious tracts dealing with the literal

interpretation of the Bible. Henry More's belief in the Universe and rejection of

Cartesian dualism may have influenced Newton's religious ideas. A manuscript

he sent to John Locke in which he disputed the existence of the Trinity was never

published. Later works The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended (1728)

and Observations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John

(1733) were published after his death. He also devoted a great deal of time to

alchemy (see above).

Newton was also a member of the Parliament of England from 1689 to 1690 and

in 1701, but according to some accounts his only comments were to complain

about a cold draught in the chamber and request that the window be closed.

[57]

Newton moved to London to take up the post of warden of the Royal Mint in

1696, a position that he had obtained through the patronage of Charles Montagu,

1st Earl of Halifax, then Chancellor of the Exchequer. He took charge of

England's great recoining, somewhat treading on the toes of Lord Lucas,

Governor of the Tower (and securing the job of deputy comptroller of the temporary Chester branch for Edmond

Halley). Newton became perhaps the best-known Master of the Mint upon the death of Thomas Neale in 1699, a

position Newton held for the last 30 years of his life.

[58][59]

These appointments were intended as sinecures, but

Newton took them seriously, retiring from his Cambridge duties in 1701, and exercising his power to reform the

currency and punish clippers and counterfeiters. As Master of the Mint in 1717 in the "Law of Queen Anne" Newton

moved the Pound Sterling de facto from the silver standard to the gold standard by setting the bimetallic relationship

between gold coins and the silver penny in favour of gold. This caused silver sterling coin to be melted and shipped

out of Britain. Newton was made President of the Royal Society in 1703 and an associate of the French Acadmie

des Sciences. In his position at the Royal Society, Newton made an enemy of John Flamsteed, the Astronomer

Royal, by prematurely publishing Flamsteed's Historia Coelestis Britannica, which Newton had used in his

studies.

[60]

Personal coat of arms of Sir Isaac

Newton

[61]

In April 1705, Queen Anne knighted Newton during a royal visit to Trinity

College, Cambridge. The knighthood is likely to have been motivated by

political considerations connected with the Parliamentary election in May 1705,

rather than any recognition of Newton's scientific work or services as Master of

the Mint.

[62]

Newton was the second scientist to be knighted, after Sir Francis

Bacon.

Towards the end of his life, Newton took up residence at Cranbury Park, near

Winchester with his niece and her husband, until his death in 1726.

[63]

His

half-niece, Catherine Barton Conduitt,

[64]

served as his hostess in social affairs at

his house on Jermyn Street in London; he was her "very loving Uncle,"

[65]

according to his letter to her when she was recovering from smallpox.

Newton died in his sleep in London on 20 March 1726 (OS 20 March 1726; NS

31 March 1727)

[1]

and was buried in Westminster Abbey. A bachelor, he had divested much of his estate to relatives

during his last years, and died intestate. After his death, Newton's hair was examined and found to contain mercury,

probably resulting from his alchemical pursuits. Mercury poisoning could explain Newton's eccentricity in late

life.

[66]

Isaac Newton

83

After death

Fame

French mathematician Joseph-Louis Lagrange often said that Newton was the greatest genius who ever lived, and

once added that Newton was also "the most fortunate, for we cannot find more than once a system of the world to

establish."

[67]

English poet Alexander Pope was moved by Newton's accomplishments to write the famous epitaph:

Nature and nature's laws lay hid in night;

God said "Let Newton be" and all was light.

Newton himself had been rather more modest of his own achievements, famously writing in a letter to Robert Hooke

in February 1676:

If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

[68]

Two writers think that the above quote, written at a time when Newton and Hooke were in dispute over optical

discoveries, was an oblique attack on Hooke (said to have been short and hunchbacked), rather than or in addition

to a statement of modesty.

[69][70]

On the other hand, the widely known proverb about standing on the shoulders of

giants published among others by 17th-century poet George Herbert (a former orator of the University of Cambridge

and fellow of Trinity College) in his Jacula Prudentum (1651), had as its main point that "a dwarf on a giant's

shoulders sees farther of the two", and so its effect as an analogy would place Newton himself rather than Hooke as

the 'dwarf'.

In a later memoir, Newton wrote:

I do not know what I may appear to the world, but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing

on the sea-shore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than

ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.

[71]

Albert Einstein kept a picture of Newton on his study wall alongside ones of Michael Faraday and James Clerk

Maxwell.

[72]

Newton remains influential to today's scientists, as demonstrated by a 2005 survey of members of

Britain's Royal Society (formerly headed by Newton) asking who had the greater effect on the history of science,

Newton or Einstein. Royal Society scientists deemed Newton to have made the greater overall contribution.

[73]

In

1999, an opinion poll of 100 of today's leading physicists voted Einstein the "greatest physicist ever;" with Newton

the runner-up, while a parallel survey of rank-and-file physicists by the site PhysicsWeb gave the top spot to

Newton.

[74]

Commemorations

Isaac Newton

84

Newton statue on display at the

Oxford University Museum of

Natural History

Newton's monument (1731) can be seen in Westminster Abbey, at the north of

the entrance to the choir against the choir screen, near his tomb. It was executed

by the sculptor Michael Rysbrack (16941770) in white and grey marble with

design by the architect William Kent. The monument features a figure of Newton

reclining on top of a sarcophagus, his right elbow resting on several of his great

books and his left hand pointing to a scroll with a mathematical design. Above

him is a pyramid and a celestial globe showing the signs of the Zodiac and the

path of the comet of 1680. A relief panel depicts putti using instruments such as a

telescope and prism.

[75]

The Latin inscription on the base translates as:

Here is buried Isaac Newton, Knight, who by a strength of mind

almost divine, and mathematical principles peculiarly his own,

explored the course and figures of the planets, the paths of comets,

the tides of the sea, the dissimilarities in rays of light, and, what no

other scholar has previously imagined, the properties of the colours

thus produced. Diligent, sagacious and faithful, in his expositions of

nature, antiquity and the holy Scriptures, he vindicated by his philosophy the majesty of God mighty and

good, and expressed the simplicity of the Gospel in his manners. Mortals rejoice that there has existed

such and so great an ornament of the human race! He was born on 25 December 1642, and died on 20

March 1726/7. Translation from G.L. Smyth, The Monuments and Genii of St. Paul's Cathedral, and

of Westminster Abbey (1826), ii, 7034.

[75]

From 1978 until 1988, an image of Newton designed by Harry Ecclestone appeared on Series D 1 banknotes issued

by the Bank of England (the last 1 notes to be issued by the Bank of England). Newton was shown on the reverse of

the notes holding a book and accompanied by a telescope, a prism and a map of the Solar System.

[76]

Eduardo Paolozzi's Newton, after William Blake

(1995), outside the British Library

A statue of Isaac Newton, looking at an apple at his feet, can be seen at

the Oxford University Museum of Natural History. A large bronze

statue, Newton, after William Blake, by Eduardo Paolozzi, dated 1995

and inspired by Blake's etching, dominates the piazza of the British

Library in London.

Personal life

Newton never married, and no evidence has been uncovered that he

had any romantic relationship. Although it is impossible to verify, it is

commonly believed that he died a virgin, as has been commented on by

such figures as mathematician Charles Hutton,

[77]

economist John

Maynard Keynes,

[78]

and physicist Carl Sagan.

[79]

French writer and philosopher Voltaire, who was in London at the time of Newton's funeral, claimed to have verified

the fact, writing that "I have had that confirmed by the doctor and the surgeon who were with him when he died"

[80]

(allegedly he stated on his deathbed that he was a virgin

[81][82]

). In 1733, Voltaire publicly stated that Newton "had

neither passion nor weakness; he never went near any woman".

[83][84]

Newton did have a close friendship with the Swiss mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, whom he met in London

around 1690.

[85]

Their friendship came to an unexplained end in 1693. Some of their correspondence has survived.

Isaac Newton

85

Religious views

Newton's tomb in Westminster

Abbey

In a minority view, T.C. Pfizenmaier argues that Newton held the Eastern

Orthodox view on the Trinity rather than the Western one held by Roman

Catholics, Anglicans and most Protestants.

[86]

However, this type of view 'has

lost support of late with the availability of Newton's theological papers',

[87]

and

now most scholars identify Newton as an Antitrinitarian monotheist.

[6][88]

'In

Newton's eyes, worshipping Christ as God was idolatry, to him the fundamental

sin'.

[89]

Historian Stephen D. Snobelen says of Newton, "Isaac Newton was a

heretic. But... he never made a public declaration of his private faithwhich the

orthodox would have deemed extremely radical. He hid his faith so well that

scholars are still unravelling his personal beliefs."

[6]

Snobelen concludes that

Newton was at least a Socinian sympathiser (he owned and had thoroughly read

at least eight Socinian books), possibly an Arian and almost certainly an

anti-trinitarian.

[6]

In an age notable for its religious intolerance, there are few

public expressions of Newton's radical views, most notably his refusal to receive

holy orders and his refusal, on his death bed, to receive the sacrament when it was offered to him.

[6]

Although the laws of motion and universal gravitation became Newton's best-known discoveries, he warned against

using them to view the Universe as a mere machine, as if akin to a great clock. He said, "Gravity explains the

motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion. God governs all things and knows all that

is or can be done."

[90]

Along with his scientific fame, Newton's studies of the Bible and of the early Church Fathers were also noteworthy.

Newton wrote works on textual criticism, most notably An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of

Scripture. He placed the crucifixion of Jesus Christ at 3 April, AD 33, which agrees with one traditionally accepted

date.

[91]

He also tried unsuccessfully to find hidden messages within the Bible.

Newton wrote more on religion than he did on natural science. He believed in a rationally immanent world, but he

rejected the hylozoism implicit in Leibniz and Baruch Spinoza. The ordered and dynamically informed Universe

could be understood, and must be understood, by an active reason. In his correspondence, Newton claimed that in

writing the Principia "I had an eye upon such Principles as might work with considering men for the belief of a

Deity".

[92]

He saw evidence of design in the system of the world: "Such a wonderful uniformity in the planetary

system must be allowed the effect of choice". But Newton insisted that divine intervention would eventually be

required to reform the system, due to the slow growth of instabilities.

[93]

For this, Leibniz lampooned him: "God

Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems,

sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion."

[94]

Newton's position was vigorously defended by his follower

Samuel Clarke in a famous correspondence. A century later, Pierre-Simon Laplace's work "Celestial Mechanics" had

a natural explanation for why the planet orbits don't require periodic divine intervention.

[95]

Effect on religious thought

Newton and Robert Boyle's mechanical philosophy was promoted by rationalist pamphleteers as a viable alternative

to the pantheists and enthusiasts, and was accepted hesitantly by orthodox preachers as well as dissident preachers

like the latitudinarians.

[96]

The clarity and simplicity of science was seen as a way to combat the emotional and

metaphysical superlatives of both superstitious enthusiasm and the threat of atheism,

[97]

and at the same time, the

second wave of English deists used Newton's discoveries to demonstrate the possibility of a "Natural Religion".

Isaac Newton

86

Newton, by William Blake; here, Newton is

depicted critically as a "divine geometer".

The attacks made against pre-Enlightenment "magical thinking", and

the mystical elements of Christianity, were given their foundation with

Boyle's mechanical conception of the Universe. Newton gave Boyle's

ideas their completion through mathematical proofs and, perhaps more

importantly, was very successful in popularising them.

[98]

Newton

refashioned the world governed by an interventionist God into a world

crafted by a God that designs along rational and universal

principles.

[99]

These principles were available for all people to

discover, allowed people to pursue their own aims fruitfully in this life,

not the next, and to perfect themselves with their own rational

powers.

[100]

Newton saw God as the master creator whose existence could not be denied in the face of the grandeur of all

creation.

[101][102][103]

His spokesman, Clarke, rejected Leibniz' theodicy which cleared God from the responsibility

for l'origine du mal by making God removed from participation in his creation, since as Clarke pointed out, such a

deity would be a king in name only, and but one step away from atheism.

[104]

But the unforeseen theological

consequence of the success of Newton's system over the next century was to reinforce the deist position advocated

by Leibniz.

[105]

The understanding of the world was now brought down to the level of simple human reason, and

humans, as Odo Marquard argued, became responsible for the correction and elimination of evil.

[106]

End of the world

In a manuscript he wrote in 1704 in which he describes his attempts to extract scientific information from the Bible,

he estimated that the world would end no earlier than 2060. In predicting this he said, "This I mention not to assert

when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fanciful men who are frequently

predicting the time of the end, and by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions

fail."

[107]

Enlightenment philosophers

Enlightenment philosophers chose a short history of scientific predecessors Galileo, Boyle, and Newton

principally as the guides and guarantors of their applications of the singular concept of Nature and Natural Law to

every physical and social field of the day. In this respect, the lessons of history and the social structures built upon it

could be discarded.

[108]

It was Newton's conception of the Universe based upon Natural and rationally understandable laws that became one

of the seeds for Enlightenment ideology.

[109]

Locke and Voltaire applied concepts of Natural Law to political

systems advocating intrinsic rights; the physiocrats and Adam Smith applied Natural conceptions of psychology and

self-interest to economic systems; and sociologists criticised the current social order for trying to fit history into

Natural models of progress. Monboddo and Samuel Clarke resisted elements of Newton's work, but eventually

rationalised it to conform with their strong religious views of nature.

Counterfeiters

As warden of the Royal Mint, Newton estimated that 20 percent of the coins taken in during The Great Recoinage of

1696 were counterfeit. Counterfeiting was high treason, punishable by the felon's being hanged, drawn and

quartered. Despite this, convicting the most flagrant criminals could be extremely difficult. However, Newton

proved to be equal to the task.

[110]

Disguised as a habitu of bars and taverns, he gathered much of that evidence

himself.

[111]

For all the barriers placed to prosecution, and separating the branches of government, English law still

had ancient and formidable customs of authority. Newton had himself made a justice of the peace in all the home

Isaac Newton

87

countiesthere is a draft of a letter regarding this matter stuck into Newton's personal first edition of his

Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica which he must have been amending at the time.

[112]

Then he

conducted more than 100 cross-examinations of witnesses, informers, and suspects between June 1698 and

Christmas 1699. Newton successfully prosecuted 28 coiners.

[113]

One of Newton's cases as the King's attorney was against William Chaloner.

[114]

Chaloner's schemes included

setting up phony conspiracies of Catholics and then turning in the hapless conspirators whom he had entrapped.

Chaloner made himself rich enough to posture as a gentleman. Petitioning Parliament, Chaloner accused the Mint of

providing tools to counterfeiters (a charge also made by others). He proposed that he be allowed to inspect the Mint's

processes in order to improve them. He petitioned Parliament to adopt his plans for a coinage that could not be

counterfeited, while at the same time striking false coins.

[115]

Newton put Chaloner on trial for counterfeiting and

had him sent to Newgate Prison in September 1697. But Chaloner had friends in high places, who helped him secure

an acquittal and his release.

[114]

Newton put him on trial a second time with conclusive evidence. Chaloner was

convicted of high treason and hanged, drawn and quartered on 23 March 1699 at Tyburn gallows.

[116]

Laws of motion

In the Principia, Newton gives the famous three laws of motion, stated here in modern form.

Newton's First Law (also known as the Law of Inertia) states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and that an

object in uniform motion tends to stay in uniform motion unless acted upon by a net external force. The meaning of

this law is the existence of reference frames (called inertial frames) where objects not acted upon by forces move in

uniform motion (in particular, they may be at rest).

Newton's Second Law states that an applied force, , on an object equals the rate of change of its momentum, ,

with time. Mathematically, this is expressed as

Since the law applies only to systems of constant mass,

[117]

m can be brought out of the derivative operator. By

substitution using the definition of acceleration, the equation can be written in the iconic form

The first and second laws represent a break with the physics of Aristotle, in which it was believed that a force was

necessary in order to maintain motion. They state that a force is only needed in order to change an object's state of

motion. The SI unit of force is the newton, named in Newton's honour.

Newton's Third Law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that any force

exerted onto an object has a counterpart force that is exerted in the opposite direction back onto the first object. A

common example is of two ice skaters pushing against each other and sliding apart in opposite directions. Another

example is the recoil of a firearm, in which the force propelling the bullet is exerted equally back onto the gun and is

felt by the shooter. Since the objects in question do not necessarily have the same mass, the resulting acceleration of

the two objects can be different (as in the case of firearm recoil).

Unlike Aristotle's, Newton's physics is meant to be universal. For example, the second law applies both to a planet

and to a falling stone.

The vector nature of the second law addresses the geometrical relationship between the direction of the force and the

manner in which the object's momentum changes. Before Newton, it had typically been assumed that a planet

orbiting the Sun would need a forward force to keep it moving. Newton showed instead that all that was needed was

an inward attraction from the Sun. Even many decades after the publication of the Principia, this counterintuitive

idea was not universally accepted, and many scientists preferred Descartes' theory of vortices.

[118]

Isaac Newton

88

Apple incident

Reputed descendants of Newton's apple tree, at the Cambridge University Botanic Garden and the Instituto Balseiro library garden

Newton himself often told the story that he was inspired to formulate his theory of gravitation by watching the fall of

an apple from a tree.

[119]

Although it has been said that the apple story is a myth and that he did not arrive at his

theory of gravity in any single moment,

[120]

acquaintances of Newton (such as William Stukeley, whose manuscript

account of 1752 has been made available by the Royal Society)

[121]

do in fact confirm the incident, though not the

cartoon version that the apple actually hit Newton's head. Stukeley recorded in his Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton's

Life a conversation with Newton in Kensington on 15 April 1726:

[122]

... We went into the garden, & drank tea under the shade of some appletrees, only he, & myself. amidst other

discourse, he told me, he was just in the same situation, as when formerly, the notion of gravitation came into

his mind. "why should that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground," thought he to him self:

occasion'd by the fall of an apple, as he sat in a comtemplative mood: "why should it not go sideways, or

upwards? but constantly to the earths centre? assuredly, the reason is, that the earth draws it. there must be a

drawing power in matter. & the sum of the drawing power in the matter of the earth must be in the earths

centre, not in any side of the earth. therefore dos this apple fall perpendicularly, or toward the centre. if matter

thus draws matter; it must be in proportion of its quantity. therefore the apple draws the earth, as well as the

earth draws the apple."

John Conduitt, Newton's assistant at the Royal Mint and husband of Newton's niece, also described the event when

he wrote about Newton's life:

[123]

In the year 1666 he retired again from Cambridge to his mother in Lincolnshire. Whilst he was pensively

meandering in a garden it came into his thought that the power of gravity (which brought an apple from a tree

to the ground) was not limited to a certain distance from earth, but that this power must extend much further

than was usually thought. Why not as high as the Moon said he to himself & if so, that must influence her

motion & perhaps retain her in her orbit, whereupon he fell a calculating what would be the effect of that

supposition.

In similar terms, Voltaire wrote in his Essay on Epic Poetry (1727), "Sir Isaac Newton walking in his gardens, had

the first thought of his system of gravitation, upon seeing an apple falling from a tree."

It is known from his notebooks that Newton was grappling in the late 1660s with the idea that terrestrial gravity

extends, in an inverse-square proportion, to the Moon; however it took him two decades to develop the full-fledged

theory.

[124]

The question was not whether gravity existed, but whether it extended so far from Earth that it could also

be the force holding the Moon to its orbit. Newton showed that if the force decreased as the inverse square of the

Isaac Newton

89

distance, one could indeed calculate the Moon's orbital period, and get good agreement. He guessed the same force

was responsible for other orbital motions, and hence named it "universal gravitation".

Various trees are claimed to be "the" apple tree which Newton describes. The King's School, Grantham, claims that

the tree was purchased by the school, uprooted and transported to the headmaster's garden some years later. The staff

of the [now] National Trust-owned Woolsthorpe Manor dispute this, and claim that a tree present in their gardens is

the one described by Newton. A descendant of the original tree

[125]

can be seen growing outside the main gate of

Trinity College, Cambridge, below the room Newton lived in when he studied there. The National Fruit Collection at

Brogdale

[126]

can supply grafts from their tree, which appears identical to Flower of Kent, a coarse-fleshed cooking

variety.

[127]

Writings

Method of Fluxions (1671)

Of Natures Obvious Laws & Processes in Vegetation (unpublished, c. 167175)

[128]

De motu corporum in gyrum (1684)

Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687)

Opticks (1704)

Reports as Master of the Mint

[129]

(170125)

Arithmetica Universalis (1707)

The System of the World, Optical Lectures, The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms, (Amended) and De mundi

systemate (published posthumously in 1728)

Observations on Daniel and The Apocalypse of St. John (1733)

An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture (1754)

References

[1] During Newton's lifetime, two calendars were in use in Europe: the Julian ("Old Style") calendar in protestant and Orthodox regions,

including Britain; and the Gregorian ("New Style") calendar in Roman Catholic Europe. At Newton's birth, Gregorian dates were ten days

ahead of Julian dates: thus his birth is recorded as taking place on 25 December 1642 Old Style, but can be converted to a New Style (modern)

date of 4 January 1643. By the time of his death, the difference between the calendars had increased to eleven days: moreover, he died in the

period after the start of the New Style year on 1 January, but before that of the Old Style new year on 25 March. His death occurred on 20

March 1726 according to the Old Style calendar, but the year is usually adjusted to 1727. A full conversion to New Style gives the date 31

March 1727.

[2] Mordechai Feingold, Barrow, Isaac (16301677) (http:/ / www. oxforddnb. com/ view/ article/ 1541), Oxford Dictionary of National

Biography, Oxford University Press, September 2004; online edn, May 2007. Retrieved 24 February 2009; explained further in Mordechai

Feingold's " Newton, Leibniz, and Barrow Too: An Attempt at a Reinterpretation (http:/ / www. jstor. org/ stable/ 236236)" in Isis, Vol. 84,

No. 2 (June 1993), pp. 310338.

[3] "Newton, Isaac" (http:/ / www.chlt.org/ sandbox/ lhl/ dsb/ page. 50. a. php) in the Dictionary of Scientific Biography, n.4.

[4] Gjersten, Derek (1986). The Newton Handbook. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

[5] Westfall, Richard S. (1983) [1980]. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.5301.

ISBN978-0-521-27435-7.

[6] Snobelen, Stephen D. (1999). "Isaac Newton, heretic: the strategies of a Nicodemite" (http:/ / www. isaac-newton. org/ heretic. pdf) (PDF).

British Journal for the History of Science 32 (4): 381419. doi:10.1017/S0007087499003751. .

[7] Stokes, Mitch (2010). Isaac Newton (http:/ / books.google. gr/ books?id=zpsoSXCeg5gC& pg=PA97& lpg=PA97& dq=#v=onepage&

q="Boyle influenced Newton"& f=false). Thomas Nelson. p.97. ISBN1595553037. . Retrieved 17 October 2012.

[8] See below, under Fame.

[9] Burt, Daniel S. (2001). The biography book: a reader's guide to nonfiction, fictional, and film biographies of more than 500 of the most

fascinating individuals of all time (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=jpFrgSAaKAUC). Greenwood Publishing Group. p.315.

ISBN1-57356-256-4. ., Extract of page 315 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=jpFrgSAaKAUC& pg=PA315)

[10] "The Early Period (16081672)" (http:/ / etoile. berkeley. edu/ ~jrg/ TelescopeHistory/ Early_Period. html). James R. Graham's Home Page.

. Retrieved 3 February 2009.

[11] Christianson, Gale E. (1996). Isaac Newton and the scientific revolution (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=O61ypNXvNkUC&

pg=PA74). Oxford University Press. p.74. ISBN0-19-509224-4. .

[12] [12] Cohen, I.B. (1970). Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 11, p.43. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons

Isaac Newton

90

[13] [13] This claim was made Dr. Stukeley in 1727, in a letter about Newton written to Dr. Richard Mead. Charles Hutton, who in the late 18th

century collected oral traditions about earlier scientists, declares that there "do not appear to be any sufficient reason for his never marrying, if

he had an inclination so to do. It is much more likely that he had a constitutional indifference to the state, and even to the sex in general."

Charles Hutton "A Mathematical and Philosophical Dictionary" (1795/6) II p.100.

[14] Westfall 1994, pp 1619

[15] [15] White 1997, p. 22

[16] James, Ioan (January 2003). "Singular scientists". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 96 (1): 3639. doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.1.36.

PMC539373. PMID12519805.

[17] Michael White, Isaac Newton (1999) page 46 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=l2C3NV38tM0C& pg=PA24& dq=storer+

intitle:isaac+ intitle:newton& lr=& num=30& as_brr=0& as_pt=ALLTYPES#PPA46,M1)

[18] ed. Michael Hoskins (1997). Cambridge Illustrated History of Astronomy, p.159. Cambridge University Press

[19] Newton, Isaac. "Waste Book" (http:/ / cudl.lib. cam.ac. uk/ view/ MS-ADD-04004/ ). Cambridge University Digital Library. . Retrieved 10

January 2012.

[20] Venn, J.; Venn, J. A., eds. (19221958). " Newton, Isaac (http:/ / venn. lib. cam. ac. uk/ cgi-bin/ search. pl?sur=& suro=c& fir=& firo=c&

cit=& cito=c& c=all& tex=RY644J& sye=& eye=& col=all& maxcount=50)". Alumni Cantabrigienses (10 vols) (online ed.). Cambridge

University Press.

[21] [21] W W Rouse Ball (1908), "A short account of the history of mathematics", at page 319.

[22] D T Whiteside (ed.), The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton (Volume 1), (Cambridge University Press, 1967), part 7 "The October 1666

Tract on Fluxions", at page 400, in 2008 reprint (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=1ZcYsNBptfYC& pg=PA400).

[23] D Gjertsen (1986), "The Newton handbook", (London (Routledge & Kegan Paul) 1986), at page 149.

[24] Newton, 'Principia', 1729 English translation, at page 41 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ& pg=PA41).

[25] Newton, 'Principia', 1729 English translation, at page 54 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ& pg=PA54).

[26] Clifford Truesdell, Essays in the History of Mechanics (Berlin, 1968), at p.99.

[27] In the preface to the Marquis de L'Hospital's Analyse des Infiniment Petits (Paris, 1696).

[28] Starting with De motu corporum in gyrum, see also (Latin) Theorem 1 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=uvMGAAAAcAAJ&

pg=RA1-PA2).

[29] D T Whiteside (1970), "The Mathematical principles underlying Newton's Principia Mathematica" in Journal for the History of Astronomy,

vol.1, pages 116138, especially at pages 119120.

[30] [30] Stewart 2009, p.107

[31] Westfall 1980, pp 538539

[32] [32] Ball 1908, p. 356ff

[33] Baszczyk, Piotr; Katz, Mikhail; Sherry, David (2012), "Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking", Foundations

of Science, arXiv:1202.4153, doi:10.1007/s10699-012-9285-8

[34] [34] White 1997, p. 151

[35] King, Henry C (2003). ''The History of the Telescope'' By Henry C. King, Page 74 (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=KAWwzHlDVksC&

dq=history+ of+ the+ telescope& printsec=frontcover). Google Books. ISBN978-0-486-43265-6. . Retrieved 16 January 2010.

[36] Newton, Isaac. "Hydrostatics, Optics, Sound and Heat" (http:/ / cudl. lib. cam. ac. uk/ view/ MS-ADD-03970/ ). Cambridge University

Digital Library. . Retrieved 10 January 2012.

[37] [37] Ball 1908, p. 324

[38] William R. Newman, "Newton's Early Optical Theory and its Debt to Chymistry," in Danielle Jacquart and Michel Hochmann, eds.,

Lumire et vision dans les sciences et dans les arts (Geneva: Droz, 2010), pp. 283-307. A free access online version of this article can be

found at the Chymistry of Isaac Newton project (http:/ / webapp1. dlib. indiana. edu/ newton/ html/ Newton_optics-alchemy_Jacquart_paper.

pdf)

[39] [39] Ball 1908, p. 325

[40] [40] White 1997, p170

[41] Hall, Alfred Rupert (1996). '''Isaac Newton: adventurer in thought''', by Alfred Rupert Hall, page 67 (http:/ / books. google. com/

?id=32IDpTdthm4C& pg=PA67& lpg=PA67& dq=newton+ reflecting+ telescope+ + 1668+ letter+ 1669& q=newton reflecting telescope

1668 letter 1669). Google Books. ISBN978-0-521-56669-8. . Retrieved 16 January 2010.

[42] [42] White 1997, p168

[43] See 'Correspondence of Isaac Newton, vol.2, 16761687' ed. H W Turnbull, Cambridge University Press 1960; at page 297, document No.

235, letter from Hooke to Newton dated 24 November 1679.

[44] [44] Iliffe, Robert (2007) Newton. A very short introduction, Oxford University Press 2007

[45] Keynes, John Maynard (1972). "Newton, The Man". The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes Volume X. MacMillan St. Martin's

Press. pp.3634.

[46] Dobbs, J.T. (December 1982). "Newton's Alchemy and His Theory of Matter". Isis 73 (4): 523. doi:10.1086/353114. quoting Opticks

[47] Duarte, F. J. (2000). "Newton, prisms, and the 'opticks' of tunable lasers" (http:/ / www. opticsjournal. com/ F. J. DuarteOPN(2000). pdf).

Optics and Photonics News 11 (5): 2425. Bibcode2000OptPN..11...24D. doi:10.1364/OPN.11.5.000024. .

[48] R S Westfall, 'Never at Rest', 1980, at pages 3912.

[49] D T Whiteside (ed.), 'Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton', vol.6, 16841691, Cambridge University Press 1974, at page 30.

Isaac Newton

91

[50] See Curtis Wilson, "The Newtonian achievement in astronomy", pages 233274 in R Taton & C Wilson (eds) (1989) The General History

of Astronomy, Volume, 2A', at page 233 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=rkQKU-wfPYMC& pg=PA233).

[51] Text quotations are from 1729 translation of Newton's Principia, Book 3 (1729 vol.2) at pages 232233 (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=6EqxPav3vIsC& pg=PA233).

[52] Edelglass et al., Matter and Mind, ISBN 0-940262-45-2. p. 54

[53] On the meaning and origins of this expression, see Kirsten Walsh, Does Newton feign an hypothesis? (https:/ / blogs. otago. ac. nz/ emxphi/

2010/ 10/ does-newton-feign-an-hypothesis/ ), Early Modern Experimental Philosophy (https:/ / blogs. otago. ac. nz/ emxphi/ ), 18 October

2010.

[54] [54] Westfall 1980. Chapter 11.

[55] Westfall 1980. pp 493497 on the friendship with Fatio, pp 531540 on Newton's breakdown.

[56] Conics and Cubics, Robert Bix, Springer Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, 2nd edition, 2006, Springer Verlag.

[57] [57] White 1997, p. 232

[58] "[ Newton: Physicist And ... Crime Fighter? (http:/ / www. npr. org/ templates/ story/ story. php?storyId=105012144|Isaac)]". Science

Friday. 5 June 2009. NPR.

[59] Thomas Levenson (2009). Newton and the counterfeiter : the unknown detective career of the world's greatest scientist. Houghton Mifflin

Harcourt. ISBN978-0-15-101278-7. OCLC276340857.

[60] [60] White 1997, p.317

[61] Gerard Michon. "Coat of arms of Isaac Newton" (http:/ / www. numericana. com/ arms/ index. htm#newton). Numericana.com. . Retrieved

16 January 2010.

[62] [62] "The Queen's 'great Assistance' to Newton's election was his knighting, an honor bestowed not for his contributions to science, nor for his

service at the Mint, but for the greater glory of party politics in the election of 1705." Westfall 1994 p.245

[63] Yonge, Charlotte M. (1898). "Cranbury and Brambridge" (http:/ / www. online-literature. com/ charlotte-yonge/ john-keble/ 6/ ). John

Keble's Parishes Chapter 6. www.online-literature.com. . Retrieved 23 September 2009.

[64] [64] Westfall 1980, p. 44.

[65] [65] Westfall 1980, p. 595

[66] "Newton, Isaac (16421726)" (http:/ / scienceworld.wolfram. com/ biography/ Newton. html). Eric Weisstein's World of Biography. .

Retrieved 30 August 2006.

[67] Fred L. Wilson, History of Science: Newton citing: Delambre, M. "Notice sur la vie et les ouvrages de M. le comte J. L. Lagrange," Oeuvres

de Lagrange I. Paris, 1867, p. xx.

[68] Letter from Isaac Newton to Robert Hooke, 5 February 1676, as transcribed in Jean-Pierre Maury (1992) Newton: Understanding the

Cosmos, New Horizons

[69] John Gribbin (2002) Science: A History 15432001, p 164.

[70] [70] White 1997, p187.

[71] [71] Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton (1855) by Sir David Brewster (Volume II. Ch. 27)

[72] [72] "Einstein's Heroes: Imagining the World through the Language of Mathematics", by Robyn Arianrhod UQP, reviewed by Jane

Gleeson-White, 10 November 2003, The Sydney Morning Herald

[73] "Newton beats Einstein in polls of Royal Society scientists and the public" (http:/ / royalsociety. org/ News. aspx?id=1324&

terms=Newton+ beats+ Einstein+ in+ polls+ of+ scientists+ and+ the+ public). The Royal Society. .

[74] "Opinion poll. Einstein voted "greatest physicist ever" by leading physicists; Newton runner-up" (http:/ / news. bbc. co. uk/ 2/ hi/ science/

nature/ 541840. stm). BBC News. 29 November 1999. . Retrieved 17 January 2012.

[75] "Famous People & the Abbey: Sir Isaac Newton" (http:/ / www. westminster-abbey. org/ our-history/ people/ sir-isaac-newton).

Westminster Abbey. . Retrieved 13 November 2009.

[76] "Withdrawn banknotes reference guide" (http:/ / www. bankofengland. co. uk/ banknotes/ denom_guide/ nonflash/ 1-SeriesD-Revised. htm).

Bank of England. . Retrieved 27 August 2009.

[77] Hutton, Charles (1815). A Philosophical and Mathematical Dictionary Containing... Memoirs of the Lives and Writings of the Most Eminent

Authors, Volume 2 (http:/ / books.google.ca/ books?id=_xk2AAAAQAAJ& pg=PA100& lpg=PA100& dq=Charles+ Hutton+ Isaac+

Newton+ constitutional+ indifference& source=bl& ots=gxI1T-5UzL& sig=NJHnmCqkPwNalnOSrUXZZgkfODs& hl=en#v=onepage&

q=Charles Hutton Isaac Newton constitutional indifference& f=false). p.100. . Retrieved 11 September 2012.

[78] John Maynard Keynes. "Newton: the Man" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-and. ac. uk/ Extras/ Keynes_Newton. html). University of St

Andrews School of Mathematics and Statistics. . Retrieved 11 September 2012.

[79] Carl, Sagan (1980). Cosmos (http:/ / books.google.ca/ books?id=_-XhL6_xsVkC& pg=PA55& lpg=PA55& dq=Isaac+ Newton+ virgin&

source=bl& ots=pfxDt6lG8I& sig=u4GtOW8G0jCFdrppKL2o0j9ZAKU& hl=en& sa=X& ei=jrJJULeTIYnDigLs14Fo&

ved=0CEMQ6AEwAzge#v=onepage& q=Isaac Newton virgin& f=false). New York: Random House. ISBN0394502949. . Retrieved 11

September 2012.

[80] Letters on England, 14, pp. 68-70, as referenced in the footnote for the quote in p. 6 of James Gleick's biography, Isaac Newton

[81] Stokes, Mitch (2010). Isaac Newton (http:/ / books.google. ca/ books?id=zpsoSXCeg5gC& pg=PA154& lpg=PA154& dq=Isaac+ Newton+

virgin+ confess& source=bl& ots=jL4JIVcIJe& sig=JYyHgrFXKVc_fQrc_Xr3FXjJYkw& hl=en#v=onepage& q=Isaac Newton virgin

confess& f=false). Thomas Nelson. p.154. ISBN1595553037. . Retrieved 11 September 2012.

Isaac Newton

92

[82] Foster, Jacob (2005). "Everybody Loves Einstein" (http:/ / www. oxonianreview. org/ issues/ 5-1/ 5-1foster. html). The Oxonian Review 5

(1). .

[83] Gjertsen, Derek (1986). The Newton Handbook (http:/ / books. google. ca/ books?id=cqIOAAAAQAAJ& pg=PA105& lpg=PA105&

dq=Isaac+ Newton+ virgin& source=bl& ots=Sf2QL1yV2J& sig=0m7VW3Ca0_jKFl-k-P8FNAATuaY& hl=en#v=onepage& q=Isaac

Newton virgin& f=false). Taylor & Francis. p.105. ISBN0710202792. . Retrieved 11 September 2012.

[84] Fara, Patricia (2011). Newton: The Making of Genius. Pan Macmillan. ISBN1447204530.

[85] Professor Robert A. Hatch, University of Florida. "Newton Timeline" (http:/ / web. clas. ufl. edu/ users/ ufhatch/ pages/ 13-NDFE/ newton/

05-newton-timeline-m. htm). . Retrieved 13 August 2012.

[86] Pfizenmaier, T.C. (1997). "Was Isaac Newton an Arian?". Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1): 5780.

[87] Snobelen, Stephen D. (1999). "Isaac Newton, heretic: the strategies of a Nicodemite" (http:/ / www. isaac-newton. org/ heretic. pdf) (PDF).

British Journal for the History of Science 32 (4): 381419. doi:10.1017/S0007087499003751. .

[88] Avery Cardinal Dulles. The Deist Minimum (http:/ / www. firstthings. com/ print. php?type=article& year=2008& month=08&

title_link=the-deist-minimum--28). January 2005.

[89] Westfall, Richard S. (1994). The Life of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-47737-9.

[90] Tiner, J.H. (1975). Isaac Newton: Inventor, Scientist and Teacher. Milford, Michigan, U.S.: Mott Media. ISBN0-915134-95-0.

[91] John P. Meier, A Marginal Jew, v. 1, pp. 382402 after narrowing the years to 30 or 33, provisionally judges 30 most likely.

[92] Newton to Richard Bentley 10 December 1692, in Turnbull et al. (195977), vol 3, p. 233.

[93] [93] Opticks, 2nd Ed 1706. Query 31.

[94] H. G. Alexander (ed) The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence, Manchester University Press, 1998, p. 11.

[95] Neil Degrasse Tyson (November 2005). "The Perimeter of Ignorance" (http:/ / www. haydenplanetarium. org/ tyson/ read/ 2005/ 11/ 01/

the-perimeter-of-ignorance). Natural History Magazine. .

[96] Jacob, Margaret C. (1976). The Newtonians and the English Revolution: 16891720. Cornell University Press. pp.37, 44.

ISBN0-85527-066-7.

[97] Westfall, Richard S. (1958). Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven: Yale University Press. p.200.

ISBN0-208-00843-8.

[98] Haakonssen, Knud. "The Enlightenment, politics and providence: some Scottish and English comparisons". In Martin Fitzpatrick ed..

Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in eighteenth-century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.64.

ISBN0-521-56060-8.

[99] Frankel, Charles (1948). The Faith of Reason: The Idea of Progress in the French Enlightenment. New York: King's Crown Press. p.1.

[100] Germain, Gilbert G.. A Discourse on Disenchantment: Reflections on Politics and Technology. p.28. ISBN0-7914-1319-5.

[101] [101] Principia, Book III; cited in; Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections from his writings, p. 42, ed. H.S. Thayer, Hafner Library of

Classics, NY, 1953.

[102] [102] A Short Scheme of the True Religion, manuscript quoted in Memoirs of the Life, Writings and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton by Sir

David Brewster, Edinburgh, 1850; cited in; ibid, p. 65.

[103] [103] Webb, R.K. ed. Knud Haakonssen. "The emergence of Rational Dissent." Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in

eighteenth-century Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1996. p19.

[104] H. G. Alexander (ed) The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence, Manchester University Press, 1998, p. 14.

[105] [105] Westfall, 1958 p201.

[106] [106] Marquard, Odo. "Burdened and Disemburdened Man and the Flight into Unindictability," in Farewell to Matters of Principle. Robert M.

Wallace trans. London: Oxford UP, 1989.

[107] "Papers Show Isaac Newton's Religious Side, Predict Date of Apocalypse" (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20070813033620/ http:/ / www.

christianpost. com/ article/ 20070619/ 28049_Papers_Show_Isaac_Newton's_Religious_Side,_Predict_Date_of_Apocalypse. htm). Associated

Press. 19 June 2007. Archived from the original (http:/ / www. christianpost. com/ article/ 20070619/

28049_Papers_Show_Isaac_Newton's_Religious_Side,_Predict_Date_of_Apocalypse. htm) on 13 August 2007. . Retrieved 1 August 2007.

[108] [108] Cassels, Alan. Ideology and International Relations in the Modern World. p2.

[109] "Although it was just one of the many factors in the Enlightment, the success of Newtonian physics in providing a mathematical

description of an ordered world clearly played a big part in the flowering of this movement in the eighteenth century" John Gribbin (2002)

Science: A History 15432001, p 241

[110] [110] White 1997, p. 259

[111] [111] White 1997, p. 267

[112] Newton, Isaac. "Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica" (http:/ / cudl. lib. cam. ac. uk/ view/ PR-ADV-B-00039-00001/ ).

Cambridge University Digital Library. pp.265266. . Retrieved 10 January 2012.

[113] [113] Westfall 2007, p.73

[114] [114] White 1997, p 269

[115] [115] Westfall 1994, p 229

[116] Westfall 1980, pp. 5715

[117] Halliday; Resnick. Physics. 1. pp.199. ISBN0-471-03710-9. "It is important to note that we cannot derive a general expression for

Newton's second law for variable mass systems by treating the mass in F = dP/dt = d(Mv) as a variable. [...] We can use F = dP/dt to analyze

variable mass systems only if we apply it to an entire system of constant mass having parts among which there is an interchange of mass."

Isaac Newton

93

[Emphasis as in the original]

[118] [118] Ball 1908, p. 337

[119] [119] White 1997, p. 86

[120] Scott Berkun (27 August 2010). The Myths of Innovation (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=kPCgnc70MSgC& pg=PA4). O'Reilly

Media, Inc.. p.4. ISBN978-1-4493-8962-8. . Retrieved 7 September 2011.

[121] Newton's apple: The real story (http:/ / www.newscientist. com/ blogs/ culturelab/ 2010/ 01/ newtons-apple-the-real-story. php). New

Scientist. 18 January 2010. . Retrieved 10 May 2010

[122] Hamblyn, Richard (2011). " Newtonian Apples: William Stukeley (http:/ / books. google. co. uk/ books?id=1xKFSqsDj0MC& pg=PT57)".

The Art of Science. Pan Macmillan. ISBN978-1-4472-0415-2.

[123] Conduitt, John. "Keynes Ms. 130.4:Conduitt's account of Newton's life at Cambridge" (http:/ / www. newtonproject. sussex. ac. uk/ view/

texts/ normalized/ THEM00167). Newtonproject. Imperial College London. . Retrieved 30 August 2006.

[124] I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Newton (2002) p. 6

[125] Alberto A. Martinez Science Secrets: The Truth about Darwin's Finches, Einstein's Wife, and Other Myths, page 69 (University of

Pittsburgh Press, 2011). ISBN 978-0-8229-4407-2

[126] "Brogdale Home of the National Fruit Collection" (http:/ / www. brogdale. org/ ). Brogdale.org. . Retrieved 20 December 2008.

[127] "From the National Fruit Collection: Isaac Newton's Tree" (http:/ / www. brogdale. org. uk/ image1. php?varietyid=1089). . Retrieved 10

January 2009.

[128] Newton's alchemical works (http:/ / webapp1. dlib. indiana. edu/ newton/ index. jsp) transcribed and online at Indiana University.

Retrieved 11 January 2007.

[129] http:/ / www.pierre-marteau.com/ editions/ 1701-25-mint-reports. html

Bibliography

Ball, W.W. Rouse (1908). A Short Account of the History of Mathematics. New York: Dover.

ISBN0-486-20630-0.

Christianson, Gale (1984). In the Presence of the Creator: Isaac Newton & His Times. New York: Free Press.

ISBN0-02-905190-8. This well documented work provides, in particular, valuable information regarding

Newton's knowledge of Patristics

Craig, John (1958). "Isaac Newton Crime Investigator". Nature 182 (4629): 149152.

Bibcode1958Natur.182..149C. doi:10.1038/182149a0.

Craig, John (1963). "Isaac Newton and the Counterfeiters". Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 18

(2): 136145. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1963.0017.

Levenson, Thomas (2010). Newton and the Counterfeiter: The Unknown Detective Career of the World's Greatest

Scientist. Mariner Books. ISBN978-0-547-33604-6.

Stewart, James (2009). Calculus: Concepts and Contexts. Cengage Learning. ISBN978-0-495-55742-5.

Westfall, Richard S. (1980, 1998). Never at Rest. Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-27435-4.

Westfall, Richard S. (2007). Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-19-921355-9.

Westfall, Richard S. (1994). The Life of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-47737-9.

White, Michael (1997). Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer. Fourth Estate Limited. ISBN1-85702-416-8.

Further reading

Andrade, E. N. De C. (1950). Isaac Newton. New York: Chanticleer Press. ISBN0-8414-3014-4.

Bardi, Jason Socrates. The Calculus Wars: Newton, Leibniz, and the Greatest Mathematical Clash of All Time.

2006. 277 pp. excerpt and text search (http:/ / www. amazon. com/ dp/ 1560259922)

Bechler, Zev (1991). Newton's Physics and the Conceptual Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Springer.

ISBN0-7923-1054-3..

Berlinski, David. Newton's Gift: How Sir Isaac Newton Unlocked the System of the World. (2000). 256 pages.

excerpt and text search (http:/ / www. amazon. com/ dp/ 0743217764) ISBN 0-684-84392-7

Buchwald, Jed Z. and Cohen, I. Bernard, eds. Isaac Newton's Natural Philosophy. MIT Press, 2001. 354 pages.

excerpt and text search (http:/ / www. amazon. com/ dp/ 0262524252)

Isaac Newton

94

Casini, P (1988). "Newton's Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment". Notes and Records of the

Royal Society of London 42 (1): 3552. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1988.0006. ISSN00359149. JSTOR531368.

Christianson, Gale E (1996). Isaac Newton and the Scientific Revolution. Oxford University Press.

ISBN0-19-530070-X. See this site (http:/ / www. amazon. com/ dp/ 019530070X) for excerpt and text search.

Christianson, Gale (1984). In the Presence of the Creator: Isaac Newton & His Times. New York: Free Press.

ISBN0-02-905190-8.

Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Newton. (2002). 500 pp. focuses on

philosophical issues only; excerpt and text search (http:/ / www. amazon. com/ dp/ 0521656966); complete

edition online (http:/ / www. questia. com/ read/ 105054986)

Cohen, I. B (1980). The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-22964-2.

Craig, John (1946). Newton at the Mint. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Dampier, William C; Dampier, M. (1959). Readings in the Literature of Science. New York: Harper & Row.

ISBN0-486-42805-2.

de Villamil, Richard (1931). Newton, the Man. London: G.D. Knox. Preface by Albert Einstein. Reprinted by

Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York (1972).

Dobbs, B. J. T (1975). The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy or "The Hunting of the Greene Lyon". Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Gjertsen, Derek (1986). The Newton Handbook. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN0-7102-0279-2.

Gleick, James (2003). Isaac Newton. Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN0-375-42233-1.

Halley, E (1687). "Review of Newton's Principia". Philosophical Transactions 186: 291297.

Hawking, Stephen, ed. On the Shoulders of Giants. ISBN 0-7624-1348-4 Places selections from Newton's

Principia in the context of selected writings by Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo and Einstein

Herivel, J. W. (1965). The Background to Newton's Principia. A Study of Newton's Dynamical Researches in the

Years 166484. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Keynes, John Maynard (1963). Essays in Biography. W. W. Norton & Co. ISBN0-393-00189-X. Keynes took a

close interest in Newton and owned many of Newton's private papers.

Koyr, A (1965). Newtonian Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Newton, Isaac. Papers and Letters in Natural Philosophy, edited by I. Bernard Cohen. Harvard University Press,

1958,1978. ISBN 0-674-46853-8.

Newton, Isaac (16421726). The Principia: a new Translation, Guide by I. Bernard Cohen ISBN 0-520-08817-4

University of California (1999)

Pemberton, H (1728). A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy. London: S. Palmer.

Shamos, Morris H. (1959). Great Experiments in Physics. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc..

ISBN0-486-25346-5.

Shapley, Harlow, S. Rapport, and H. Wright. A Treasury of Science; "Newtonia" pp.1479; "Discoveries"

pp.1504. Harper & Bros., New York, (1946).

Simmons, J (1996). The Giant Book of Scientists The 100 Greatest Minds of all Time. Sydney: The Book

Company.

Stukeley, W. (1936). Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton's Life. London: Taylor and Francis. (edited by A. H. White;

originally published in 1752)

Westfall, R. S (1971). Force in Newton's Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London:

Macdonald. ISBN0-444-19611-0.

Religion

Dobbs, Betty Jo Tetter. The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought. (1991), links the

alchemy to Arianism

Force, James E., and Richard H. Popkin, eds. Newton and Religion: Context, Nature, and Influence. (1999),

342pp . Pp. xvii + 325. 13 papers by scholars using newly opened manuscripts

Isaac Newton

95

Ramati, Ayval. "The Hidden Truth of Creation: Newton's Method of Fluxions" British Journal for the History of

Science 34: 417438. in JSTOR (http:/ / www. jstor. org/ stable/ 4028372), argues that his calculus had a

theological basis

Snobelen, Stephen "'God of Gods, and Lord of Lords': The Theology of Isaac Newton's General Scholium to the

Principia," Osiris, 2nd Series, Vol. 16, (2001), pp.169208 in JSTOR (http:/ / www. jstor. org/ stable/ 301985)

Snobelen, Stephen D. (1999). "Isaac Newton, Heretic: The Strategies of a Nicodemite". British Journal for the

History of Science 32 (4): 381419. doi:10.1017/S0007087499003751. JSTOR4027945.

Pfizenmaier, Thomas C. (January 1997). "Was Isaac Newton an Arian?". Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1):

5780. JSTOR3653988.

Wiles, Maurice. Archetypal Heresy. Arianism through the Centuries. (1996) 214 pages, with chapter 4 on 18th

century England; pp.7793 on Newton, excerpt and text search (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=DGksMzk37hMC& printsec=frontcover& dq="Arianism+ through+ the+ Centuries").

Primary sources

Newton, Isaac. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press,

(1999). 974 pp.

Brackenridge, J. Bruce. The Key to Newton's Dynamics: The Kepler Problem and the Principia: Containing an

English Translation of Sections 1, 2, and 3 of Book One from the First (1687) Edition of Newton's

Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press, 1996. 299 pp.

Newton, Isaac. The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton. Vol. 1: The Optical Lectures, 16701672. Cambridge U.

Press, 1984. 627 pp.

Newton, Isaac. Opticks (4th ed. 1730) online edition (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=GnAFAAAAQAAJ& dq=newton+ opticks& pg=PP1& ots=Nnl345oqo_&

sig=0mBTaXUI_K6w-JDEu_RvVq5TNqc& prev=http:/ / www. google. com/ search?q=newton+ opticks&

rls=com. microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox& ie=UTF-8& oe=UTF-8& sourceid=ie7& rlz=1I7GGLJ& sa=X&

oi=print& ct=title& cad=one-book-with-thumbnail)

Newton, I. (1952). Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light. New

York: Dover Publications.

Newton, I. Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World, tr. A.

Motte, rev. Florian Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press. (1934).

Whiteside, D. T (196782). The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ISBN0-521-07740-0. 8 volumes.

Newton, Isaac. The correspondence of Isaac Newton, ed. H. W. Turnbull and others, 7 vols. (195977).

Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections from His Writings edited by H. S. Thayer, (1953), online edition (http:/

/ www. questia. com/ read/ 5876270).

Isaac Newton, Sir; J Edleston; Roger Cotes, Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton and Professor Cotes, including

letters of other eminent men (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?as_brr=1& id=OVPJ6c9_kKgC&

vid=OCLC14437781& dq="isaac+ newton"& jtp=I), London, John W. Parker, West Strand; Cambridge, John

Deighton, 1850 (Google Books).

Maclaurin, C. (1748). An Account of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophical Discoveries, in Four Books. London: A.

Millar and J. Nourse.

Newton, I. (1958). Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy and Related Documents, eds. I. B.

Cohen and R. E. Schofield. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Newton, I. (1962). The Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton: A Selection from the Portsmouth

Collection in the University Library, Cambridge, ed. A. R. Hall and M. B. Hall. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Newton, I. (1975). Isaac Newton's 'Theory of the Moon's Motion' (1702). London: Dawson.

Isaac Newton

96

External links

Newton's Scholar Google profile (http:/ / scholar. google. com. au/ citations?user=xJaxiEEAAAAJ& hl=en)

ScienceWorld biography (http:/ / scienceworld. wolfram. com/ biography/ Newton. html) by Eric Weisstein

Dictionary of Scientific Biography (http:/ / www. chlt. org/ sandbox/ lhl/ dsb/ page. 50. a. php)

"The Newton Project" (http:/ / www. newtonproject. sussex. ac. uk/ prism. php?id=1)

"The Newton Project Canada" (http:/ / www. isaacnewton. ca/ )

"Rebuttal of Newton's astrology" (http:/ / web. archive. org/ web/ 20080629021908/ http:/ / www. skepticreport.

com/ predictions/ newton. htm) (via archive.org)

"Newton's Religious Views Reconsidered" (http:/ / www. galilean-library. org/ snobelen. html)

"Newton's Royal Mint Reports" (http:/ / www. pierre-marteau. com/ editions/ 1701-25-mint-reports. html)

"Newton's Dark Secrets" (http:/ / www. pbs. org/ wgbh/ nova/ newton/ ) - NOVA TV programme

from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

"Isaac Newton" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ newton/ ), by George Smith

"Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/

newton-principia/ ), by George Smith

"Newton's Philosophy" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ newton-philosophy/ ), by Andrew Janiak

"Newton's views on space, time, and motion" (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ entries/ newton-stm/ ), by Robert

Rynasiewicz

"Newton's Castle" (http:/ / www. tqnyc. org/ NYC051308/ index. htm) - educational material

"The Chymistry of Isaac Newton" (http:/ / www. dlib. indiana. edu/ collections/ newton), research on his

alchemical writings

"FMA Live!" (http:/ / www. fmalive. com/ ) - program for teaching Newton's laws to kids

Newton's religious position (http:/ / www. adherents. com/ people/ pn/ Isaac_Newton. html)

The "General Scholium" to Newton's Principia (http:/ / hss. fullerton. edu/ philosophy/ GeneralScholium. htm)

Kandaswamy, Anand M. "The Newton/Leibniz Conflict in Context" (http:/ / www. math. rutgers. edu/ courses/

436/ Honors02/ newton. html)

Newton's First ODE (http:/ / www. phaser. com/ modules/ historic/ newton/ index. html) A study by on how

Newton approximated the solutions of a first-order ODE using infinite series

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Isaac Newton" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Newton. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

Isaac Newton (http:/ / genealogy. math. ndsu. nodak. edu/ id. php?id=74313) at the Mathematics Genealogy

Project

"The Mind of Isaac Newton" (http:/ / www. ltrc. mcmaster. ca/ newton/ ) - images, audio, animations and

interactive segments

Enlightening Science (http:/ / www. enlighteningscience. sussex. ac. uk/ home) Videos on Newton's biography,

optics, physics, reception, and on his views on science and religion

Newton biography (University of St Andrews) (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/ Mathematicians/

Newton. html)

Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Newton, Sir Isaac". Encyclopdia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University

Press.

and see at s:Author:Isaac Newton for the following works about him:

"Newton, Sir Isaac" in A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature by John William Cousin,

London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1910.

"Newton, Isaac," in Dictionary of National Biography, London: Smith, Elder, & Co., (18851900)

Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton's life by William Stukeley, 1752

Writings by Newton

Isaac Newton

97

Newton's works full texts, at the Newton Project (http:/ / www. newtonproject. sussex. ac. uk/ prism.

php?id=43)

The Newton Manuscripts at the National Library of Israel - the collection of all his religious writings (http:/ / web.

nli. org. il/ sites/ NLI/ English/ collections/ Humanities/ Pages/ newton. aspx)

Works by Isaac Newton (http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ author/ Isaac_Newton) at Project Gutenberg

"Newton's Principia" (http:/ / rack1. ul. cs. cmu. edu/ is/ newton/ ) read and search

Descartes, Space, and Body and A New Theory of Light and Colour (http:/ / www. earlymoderntexts. com/ ),

modernised readable versions by Jonathan Bennett

Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light (http:/ / www. archive. org/

stream/ opticksoratreat00newtgoog#page/ n6/ mode/ 2up), full text on archive.org

"Newton Papers" (http:/ / cudl. lib. cam. ac. uk/ collections/ newton) - Cambridge Digital Library

See Wikisource at s:Author:Isaac Newton for the following works by him:

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica

Opticks: or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light

Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John

New Theory About Light and Colour

An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture

Related navpages:

Lucasian Professors of Mathematics (over 20

topics)

Royal Society presidents 1700s (over 15 topics)

Age of Enlightenment (over 60 topics)

Metaphysics (over 130 topics)

Philosophy of science (over 130 topics)

Scientists whose names are used as SI units (over

20 topics)

Newton's laws of motion

98

Newton's laws of motion

Newton's First and Second laws, in Latin, from the

original 1687 Principia Mathematica.

Newton's laws of motion are three physical laws that form the

basis for classical mechanics. They describe the relationship

between the forces acting on a body and its motion due to those

forces. They have been expressed in several different ways over

nearly three centuries,

[1]

and can be summarized as follows:

1. First law: If an object experiences no net force, then its

velocity is constant: the object is either at rest (if its velocity is

zero), or it moves in a straight line with constant speed (if its

velocity is nonzero).

[2][3][3]

2. Second law: The acceleration a of a body is parallel and

directly proportional to the net force F acting on the body, is in

the direction of the net force, and is inversely proportional to

the mass m of the body, i.e., F=ma.

3. Third law: When a first body exerts a force F

1

on a second

body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force F

2

= F

1

on the first body. This means that F

1

and F

2

are equal in

magnitude and opposite in direction.

The three laws of motion were first compiled by Sir Isaac Newton

in his work Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica, first

published in 1687.

[4]

Newton used them to explain and investigate

the motion of many physical objects and systems.

[5]

For example,

in the third volume of the text, Newton showed that these laws of motion, combined with his law of universal

gravitation, explained Kepler's laws of planetary motion.

Overview

Isaac Newton (1643-1727), the physicist

who formulated the laws

Newton's laws are applied to bodies (objects) which are considered or

idealized as a particle,

[6]

in the sense that the extent of the body is neglected

in the evaluation of its motion, i.e., the object is small compared to the

distances involved in the analysis, or the deformation and rotation of the body

is of no importance in the analysis. Therefore, a planet can be idealized as a

particle for analysis of its orbital motion around a star.

In their original form, Newton's laws of motion are not adequate to

characterize the motion of rigid bodies and deformable bodies. Leonard Euler

in 1750 introduced a generalization of Newton's laws of motion for rigid

bodies called the Euler's laws of motion, later applied as well for deformable

bodies assumed as a continuum. If a body is represented as an assemblage of

discrete particles, each governed by Newtons laws of motion, then Eulers

laws can be derived from Newtons laws. Eulers laws can, however, be taken

as axioms describing the laws of motion for extended bodies, independently

of any particle structure.

[7]

Newton's laws hold only with respect to a certain set of frames of reference called Newtonian or inertial reference

frames. Some authors interpret the first law as defining what an inertial reference frame is; from this point of view,

Newton's laws of motion

99

the second law only holds when the observation is made from an inertial reference frame, and therefore the first law

cannot be proved as a special case of the second. Other authors do treat the first law as a corollary of the second.

[8][9]

The explicit concept of an inertial frame of reference was not developed until long after Newton's death.

In the given interpretation mass, acceleration, momentum, and (most importantly) force are assumed to be externally

defined quantities. This is the most common, but not the only interpretation of the way one can consider the laws to

be a definition of these quantities.

Newtonian mechanics has been superseded by special relativity, but it is still useful as an approximation when the

speeds involved are much slower than the speed of light.

[10]

Newton's first law

The first law law states that if the net force (the vector sum of all forces acting on an object) is zero, then the velocity

of the object is constant. Velocity is a vector quantity which expresses both the object's speed and the direction of its

motion; therefore, the statement that the object's velocity is constant is a statement that both its speed and the

direction of its motion are constant.

The first law can be stated mathematically as

Consequently,

An object that is at rest will stay at rest unless an unbalanced force acts upon it.

An object that is in motion will not change its velocity unless an unbalanced force acts upon it. This is known as

uniform motion.

An object continues to do whatever it happens to be doing unless a force is exerted upon it. If it is at rest, it continues

in a state of rest (demonstrated when a tablecloth is skillfully whipped from under dishes on a tabletop and the dishes

remain in their initial state of rest). If an object is moving, it continues to move without turning or changing its

speed. This is evident in space probes that continually move in outer space. Changes in motion must be imposed

against the tendency of an object to retain its state of motion. In the absence of net forces, a moving object tends to

move along a straight line path indefinitely.

Newton placed the first law of motion to establish frames of reference for which the other laws are applicable. The

first law of motion postulates the existence of at least one frame of reference called a Newtonian or inertial reference

frame, relative to which the motion of a particle not subject to forces is a straight line at a constant speed.

[8][11]

Newton's first law is often referred to as the law of inertia. Thus, a condition necessary for the uniform motion of a

particle relative to an inertial reference frame is that the total net force acting on it is zero. In this sense, the first law

can be restated as:

In every material universe, the motion of a particle in a preferential reference frame is determined by the

action of forces whose total vanished for all times when and only when the velocity of the particle is constant

in . That is, a particle initially at rest or in uniform motion in the preferential frame continues in that state

unless compelled by forces to change it.

[12]

Newton's laws are valid only in an inertial reference frame. Any reference frame that is in uniform motion with

respect to an inertial frame is also an inertial frame, i.e. Galilean invariance or the principle of Newtonian

relativity.

[13]

Newton's laws of motion

100

History

From the original Latin of Newton's Principia:

Lex I: Corpus omne perseverare in statu suo quiescendi vel movendi uniformiter in directum, nisi quatenus a viribus impressis cogitur statum

illum mutare.

Law I: Every body persists in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its

state by force impressed.

[14]

Aristotle had the view that all objects have a natural place in the universe: that heavy objects (such as rocks) wanted

to be at rest on the Earth and that light objects like smoke wanted to be at rest in the sky and the stars wanted to

remain in the heavens. He thought that a body was in its natural state when it was at rest, and for the body to move in

a straight line at a constant speed an external agent was needed to continually propel it, otherwise it would stop

moving. Galileo Galilei, however, realized that a force is necessary to change the velocity of a body, i.e.,

acceleration, but no force is needed to maintain its velocity. In other words, Galileo stated that, in the absence of a

force, a moving object will continue moving. The tendency of objects to resist changes in motion was what Galileo

called inertia. This insight was refined by Newton, who made it into his first law, also known as the "law of

inertia"no force means no acceleration, and hence the body will maintain its velocity. As Newton's first law is a

restatement of the law of inertia which Galileo had already described, Newton appropriately gave credit to Galileo.

The law of inertia apparently occurred to several different natural philosophers and scientists independently,

including Thomas Hobbes in his Leviathan.

[15]

The 17th century philosopher Ren Descartes also formulated the

law, although he did not perform any experiments to confirm it.

Newton's second law

Explanation

The second law states that the net force on an object is equal to the rate of change (that is, the derivative) of its linear

momentum p in an inertial reference frame:

The second law can also be stated in terms of an object's acceleration. Since the law is valid only for constant-mass

systems,

[16][17][18]

the mass can be taken outside the differentiation operator by the constant factor rule in

differentiation. Thus,

where F is the net force applied, m is the mass of the body, and a is the body's acceleration. Thus, the net force

applied to a body produces a proportional acceleration. In other words, if a body is accelerating, then there is a force

on it.

Consistent with the first law, the time derivative of the momentum is non-zero when the momentum changes

direction, even if there is no change in its magnitude; such is the case with uniform circular motion. The relationship

also implies the conservation of momentum: when the net force on the body is zero, the momentum of the body is

constant. Any net force is equal to the rate of change of the momentum.

Any mass that is gained or lost by the system will cause a change in momentum that is not the result of an external

force. A different equation is necessary for variable-mass systems (see below).

Newton's laws of motion

101

Newton's second law requires modification if the effects of special relativity are to be taken into account, because at

high speeds the approximation that momentum is the product of rest mass and velocity is not accurate.

Impulse

An impulse J occurs when a force F acts over an interval of time t, and it is given by

[19][20]

Since force is the time derivative of momentum, it follows that

This relation between impulse and momentum is closer to Newton's wording of the second law.

[21]

Impulse is a concept frequently used in the analysis of collisions and impacts.

[22]

Variable-mass systems

Variable-mass systems, like a rocket burning fuel and ejecting spent gases, are not closed and cannot be directly

treated by making mass a function of time in the second law;

[17]

that is, the following formula is wrong:

[18]

The falsehood of this formula can be seen by noting that it does not respect Galilean invariance: a variable-mass

object with F= 0 in one frame will be seen to have F 0 in another frame.

[16]

The correct equation of motion for a body whose mass m varies with time by either ejecting or accreting mass is

obtained by applying the second law to the entire, constant-mass system consisting of the body and its

ejected/accreted mass; the result is

[16]

where u is the relative velocity of the escaping or incoming mass as seen by the body. From this equation one can

derive the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation.

Under some conventions, the quantity u dm/dt on the left-hand side, known as the thrust, is defined as a force (the

force exerted on the body by the changing mass, such as rocket exhaust) and is included in the quantity F. Then, by

substituting the definition of acceleration, the equation becomes F= ma.

History

Newton's original Latin reads:

Lex II: Mutationem motus proportionalem esse vi motrici impressae, et fieri secundum lineam rectam qua vis illa imprimitur.

Law II: The alteration of motion is ever proportional to the motive force impress'd; and is made in the direction of the right line in which that

force is impress'd.

[23]

this is understood, in modern terms, as an

equivalent of: The change of momentum of a body is proportional to the impulse impressed on the body, and

happens along the straight line on which that impulse is impressed.

Motte's 1729 translation of Newton's Latin continued with Newton's commentary on the second law of motion,

reading: If a force generates a motion, a double force will generate double the motion, a triple force triple the

Newton's laws of motion

102

motion, whether that force be impressed altogether and at once, or gradually and successively. And this motion

(being always directed the same way with the generating force), if the body moved before, is added to or subtracted

from the former motion, according as they directly conspire with or are directly contrary to each other; or obliquely

joined, when they are oblique, so as to produce a new motion compounded from the determination of both.

The sense or senses in which Newton used his terminology, and how he understood the second law and intended it to

be understood, have been extensively discussed by historians of science, along with the relations between Newton's

formulation and modern formulations.

[24]

Newton's third law

An illustration of Newton's third law in which two skaters push

against each other. The skater on the left exerts a force F on the

skater on the right, and the skater on the right exerts a force F on

the skater on the right.

Although the forces are equal, the accelerations are not: the less

massive skater will have a greater acceleration due to Newton's

second law.

The third law states that all forces exist in pairs: if one

object A exerts a force F

A

on a second object B, then B

simultaneously exerts a force F

B

on A, and the two

forces are equal and opposite: F

A

= F

B

.

[25]

The third

law means that all forces are interactions between

different bodies,

[26][27]

and thus that there is no such

thing as a unidirectional force or a force that acts on

only one body. This law is sometimes referred to as the

action-reaction law, with F

A

called the "action" and F

B

the "reaction". The action and the reaction are

simultaneous, and it does not matter which is called the

action and which is called reaction; both forces are part

of a single interaction, and neither force exists without

the other.

[25]

The two forces in Newton's third law are of the same

type (e.g., if the road exerts a forward frictional force

on an accelerating car's tires, then it is also a frictional

force that Newton's third law predicts for the tires

pushing backward on the road).

From a conceptual standpoint, Newton's third law is seen when a person walks: they push against the floor, and the

floor pushes against the person. Similarly, the tires of a car push against the road while the road pushes back on the

tiresthe tires and road simultaneously push against each other. In swimming, a person interacts with the water,

pushing the water backward, while the water simultaneously pushes the person forwardboth the person and the

water push against each other. The reaction forces account for the motion in these examples. These forces depend on

friction; a person or car on ice, for example, may be unable to exert the action force to produce the needed reaction

force.

[28]

Newton's laws of motion

103

History

Lex III: Actioni contrariam semper et qualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse quales et in partes

contrarias dirigi.

Law III: To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction: or the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal and are

directed in opposite directions.

A more direct translation than the one just given above is:

LAW III: To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon

each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts. Whatever draws or presses another is as much

drawn or pressed by that other. If you press a stone with your finger, the finger is also pressed by the stone. If

a horse draws a stone tied to a rope, the horse (if I may so say) will be equally drawn back towards the stone:

for the distended rope, by the same endeavour to relax or unbend itself, will draw the horse as much towards

the stone, as it does the stone towards the horse, and will obstruct the progress of the one as much as it

advances that of the other. If a body impinges upon another, and by its force changes the motion of the other,

that body also (because of the equality of the mutual pressure) will undergo an equal change, in its own

motion, toward the contrary part. The changes made by these actions are equal, not in the velocities but in the

motions of the bodies; that is to say, if the bodies are not hindered by any other impediments. For, as the

motions are equally changed, the changes of the velocities made toward contrary parts are reciprocally

proportional to the bodies. This law takes place also in attractions, as will be proved in the next scholium.

[29]

In the above, as usual, motion is Newton's name for momentum, hence his careful distinction between motion and

velocity.

Newton used the third law to derive the law of conservation of momentum;

[30]

however from a deeper perspective,

conservation of momentum is the more fundamental idea (derived via Noether's theorem from Galilean invariance),

and holds in cases where Newton's third law appears to fail, for instance when force fields as well as particles carry

momentum, and in quantum mechanics.

Importance and range of validity

Newton's laws were verified by experiment and observation for over 200 years, and they are excellent

approximations at the scales and speeds of everyday life. Newton's laws of motion, together with his law of universal

gravitation and the mathematical techniques of calculus, provided for the first time a unified quantitative explanation

for a wide range of physical phenomena.

These three laws hold to a good approximation for macroscopic objects under everyday conditions. However,

Newton's laws (combined with universal gravitation and classical electrodynamics) are inappropriate for use in

certain circumstances, most notably at very small scales, very high speeds (in special relativity, the Lorentz factor

must be included in the expression for momentum along with rest mass and velocity) or very strong gravitational

fields. Therefore, the laws cannot be used to explain phenomena such as conduction of electricity in a

semiconductor, optical properties of substances, errors in non-relativistically corrected GPS systems and

superconductivity. Explanation of these phenomena requires more sophisticated physical theories, including general

relativity and quantum field theory.

In quantum mechanics concepts such as force, momentum, and position are defined by linear operators that operate

on the quantum state; at speeds that are much lower than the speed of light, Newton's laws are just as exact for these

operators as they are for classical objects. At speeds comparable to the speed of light, the second law holds in the

original form F=dp/dt, where F and p are four-vectors.

Newton's laws of motion

104

Relationship to the conservation laws

In modern physics, the laws of conservation of momentum, energy, and angular momentum are of more general

validity than Newton's laws, since they apply to both light and matter, and to both classical and non-classical

physics.

This can be stated simply, "Momentum, energy and angular momentum cannot be created or destroyed."

Because force is the time derivative of momentum, the concept of force is redundant and subordinate to the

conservation of momentum, and is not used in fundamental theories (e.g., quantum mechanics, quantum

electrodynamics, general relativity, etc.). The standard model explains in detail how the three fundamental forces

known as gauge forces originate out of exchange by virtual particles. Other forces such as gravity and fermionic

degeneracy pressure also arise from the momentum conservation. Indeed, the conservation of 4-momentum in

inertial motion via curved space-time results in what we call gravitational force in general relativity theory.

Application of space derivative (which is a momentum operator in quantum mechanics) to overlapping wave

functions of pair of fermions (particles with half-integer spin) results in shifts of maxima of compound wavefunction

away from each other, which is observable as "repulsion" of fermions.

Newton stated the third law within a world-view that assumed instantaneous action at a distance between material

particles. However, he was prepared for philosophical criticism of this action at a distance, and it was in this context

that he stated the famous phrase "I feign no hypotheses". In modern physics, action at a distance has been completely

eliminated, except for subtle effects involving quantum entanglement. However in modern engineering in all

practical applications involving the motion of vehicles and satellites, the concept of action at a distance is used

extensively.

The discovery of the Second Law of Thermodynamics by Carnot in the 19th century showed that every physical

quantity is not conserved over time, thus disproving the validity of inducing the opposite metaphysical view from

Newton's laws. Hence, a "steady-state" worldview based solely on Newton's laws and the conservation laws does not

take entropy into account.

References and notes

[1] For explanations of Newton's laws of motion by Newton in the early 18th century, by the physicist William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) in the

mid-19th century, and by a modern text of the early 21st century, see:-

Newton's "Axioms or Laws of Motion" starting on page 19 of volume 1 of the 1729 translation (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ& pg=PA19#v=onepage& q=& f=false) of the "Principia";

Section 242, Newton's laws of motion (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=wwO9X3RPt5kC& pg=PA178) in Thomson, W (Lord

Kelvin), and Tait, P G, (1867), Treatise on natural philosophy, volume 1; and

Benjamin Crowell (2000), Newtonian Physics.

[2] [2] Halliday

[3] Browne, Michael E. (1999-07) (Series: Schaum's Outline Series). Schaum's outline of theory and problems of physics for engineering and

science (http:/ / books. google.com/ ?id=5gURYN4vFx4C& pg=PA58& dq=newton's+ first+ law+ of+ motion& q=newton's first law of

motion). McGraw-Hill Companies. pp.58. ISBN978-0-07-008498-8. .

[4] See the Principia on line at Andrew Motte Translation (http:/ / ia310114. us. archive. org/ 2/ items/ newtonspmathema00newtrich/

newtonspmathema00newtrich. pdf)

[5] Andrew Motte translation of Newton's Principia (1687) Axioms or Laws of Motion (http:/ / members. tripod. com/ ~gravitee/ axioms. htm)

[6] [...]while Newton had used the word 'body' vaguely and in at least three different meanings, Euler realized that the statements of Newton are

generally correct only when applied to masses concentrated at isolated points;Truesdell, Clifford A.; Becchi, Antonio; Benvenuto, Edoardo

(2003). Essays on the history of mechanics: in memory of Clifford Ambrose Truesdell and Edoardo Benvenuto (http:/ / books. google. com/

?id=6LO_U6T-HvsC& printsec=frontcover& dq=essays+ in+ the+ History& cd=9#v=snippet& q="isolated points"). New York: Birkhuser.

p.207. ISBN3-7643-1476-1. .

[7] Lubliner, Jacob (2008). Plasticity Theory (Revised Edition) (http:/ / www. ce. berkeley. edu/ ~coby/ plas/ pdf/ book. pdf). Dover Publications.

ISBN0-486-46290-0. .

[8] Galili, I.; Tseitlin, M. (2003). "Newton's First Law: Text, Translations, Interpretations and Physics Education" (http:/ / www. springerlink.

com/ content/ j42866672t863506/ ). Science & Education 12 (1): 4573. Bibcode2003Sc&Ed..12...45G. doi:10.1023/A:1022632600805. .

Newton's laws of motion

105

[9] Benjamin Crowell. "4. Force and Motion" (http:/ / www. lightandmatter. com/ html_books/ 1np/ ch04/ ch04. html). Newtonian Physics.

ISBN0-9704670-1-X. .

[10] In making a modern adjustment of the second law for (some of) the effects of relativity, m would be treated as the relativistic mass,

producing the relativistic expression for momentum, and the third law might be modified if possible to allow for the finite signal propagation

speed between distant interacting particles.

[11] NMJ Woodhouse (2003). Special relativity (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=ggPXQAeeRLgC& printsec=frontcover&

dq=isbn=1852334266#PPA6,M1). London/Berlin: Springer. p.6. ISBN1-85233-426-6. .

[12] Beatty, Millard F. (2006). Principles of engineering mechanics Volume 2 of Principles of Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics-The Analysis

of Motion, (http:/ / books. google.com/ ?id=wr2QOBqOBakC& lpg=PP1& pg=PA24#v=onepage& q). Springer. p.24. ISBN0-387-23704-6.

.

[13] Thornton, Marion (2004). Classical dynamics of particles and systems (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=HOqLQgAACAAJ& dq=classical

dynamics of particles and systems) (5th ed.). Brooks/Cole. p.53. ISBN0-534-40896-6. .

[14] Isaac Newton, The Principia, A new translation by I.B. Cohen and A. Whitman, University of California press, Berkeley 1999.

[15] Thomas Hobbes wrote in Leviathan:

That when a thing lies still, unless somewhat else stir it, it will lie still forever, is a truth that no man

doubts. But [the proposition] that when a thing is in motion it will eternally be in motion unless

somewhat else stay it, though the reason be the same (namely that nothing can change itself), is not so

easily assented to. For men measure not only other men but all other things by themselves. And because

they find themselves subject after motion to pain and lassitude, [they] think every thing else grows

weary of motion and seeks repose of its own accord, little considering whether it be not some other

motion wherein that desire of rest they find in themselves, consists.

[16] Plastino, Angel R.; Muzzio, Juan C. (1992). "On the use and abuse of Newton's second law for variable mass problems". Celestial

Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy (Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers) 53 (3): 227232. Bibcode1992CeMDA..53..227P.

doi:10.1007/BF00052611. ISSN0923-2958. "We may conclude emphasizing that Newton's second law is valid for constant mass only. When

the mass varies due to accretion or ablation, [an alternate equation explicitly accounting for the changing mass] should be used."

[17] Halliday; Resnick. Physics. 1. pp.199. ISBN0-471-03710-9. "It is important to note that we cannot derive a general expression for

Newton's second law for variable mass systems by treating the mass in F = dP/dt = d(Mv) as a variable. [...] We can use F = dP/dt to analyze

variable mass systems only if we apply it to an entire system of constant mass having parts among which there is an interchange of mass."

[Emphasis as in the original]

[18] Kleppner, Daniel; Robert Kolenkow (1973). An Introduction to Mechanics. McGraw-Hill. pp.133134. ISBN0-07-035048-5. "Recall that

F = dP/dt was established for a system composed of a certain set of particles[. ... I]t is essential to deal with the same set of particles

throughout the time interval[. ...] Consequently, the mass of the system can not change during the time of interest."

[19] Hannah, J, Hillier, M J, Applied Mechanics, p221, Pitman Paperbacks, 1971

[20] Raymond A. Serway, Jerry S. Faughn (2006). College Physics (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=wDKD4IggBJ4C& pg=PA247&

dq=impulse+ momentum+ "rate+ of+ change"). Pacific Grove CA: Thompson-Brooks/Cole. p.161. ISBN0-534-99724-4. .

[21] I Bernard Cohen (Peter M. Harman & Alan E. Shapiro, Eds) (2002). The investigation of difficult things: essays on Newton and the history

of the exact sciences in honour of D.T. Whiteside (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=oYZ-0PUrjBcC& pg=PA353& dq=impulse+ momentum+

"rate+ of+ change"+ -angular+ date:2000-2009). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. p.353. ISBN0-521-89266-X. .

[22] WJ Stronge (2004). Impact mechanics (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=nHgcS0bfZ28C& pg=PA12& dq=impulse+ momentum+ "rate+ of+

change"+ -angular+ date:2000-2009). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. p.12 ff. ISBN0-521-60289-0. .

[23] According to Maxwell in Matter and Motion, Newton meant by motion "the quantity of matter moved as well as the rate at which it travels"

and by impressed force he meant "the time during which the force acts as well as the intensity of the force". See Harman and Shapiro, cited

below.

[24] See for example (1) I Bernard Cohen, "Newtons Second Law and the Concept of Force in the Principia", in "The Annus Mirabilis of Sir

Isaac Newton 16661966" (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1967), pages 143185; (2) Stuart Pierson, "'Corpore cadente. . .':

Historians Discuss Newtons Second Law", Perspectives on Science, 1 (1993), pages 627658; and (3) Bruce Pourciau, "Newton's

Interpretation of Newton's Second Law", Archive for History of Exact Sciences, vol.60 (2006), pages 157207; also an online discussion by G

E Smith, in 5. Newton's Laws of Motion (http:/ / plato.stanford. edu/ entries/ newton-principia/ index. html#NewLawMot), s.5 of "Newton's

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" in (online) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2007.

[25] Resnick; Halliday; Krane (1992). Physics, Volume 1 (4th ed.). p.83.

[26] C Hellingman (1992). "Newtons third law revisited". Phys. Educ. 27 (2): 112115. Bibcode1992PhyEd..27..112H.

doi:10.1088/0031-9120/27/2/011. "Quoting Newton in the Principia: It is not one action by which the Sun attracts Jupiter, and another by

which Jupiter attracts the Sun; but it is one action by which the Sun and Jupiter mutually endeavour to come nearer together."

[27] Resnick and Halliday (1977). "Physics". John Wiley & Sons. pp.7879. "Any single force is only one aspect of a mutual interaction

between two bodies."

[28] [28] Hewitt (2006), p. 75

Newton's laws of motion

106

[29] This translation of the third law and the commentary following it can be found in the "Principia" on page 20 of volume 1 of the 1729

translation (http:/ / books.google. com/ books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ& pg=PA20#v=onepage& q=& f=false).

[30] Newton, Principia, Corollary III to the laws of motion

Further reading and works referred to

Crowell, Benjamin, (2011), Light and Matter (http:/ / www. lightandmatter. com/ lm/ ), (2011, Light and Matter),

especially at Section 4.2, Newton's First Law (http:/ / www. lightandmatter. com/ html_books/ lm/ ch04/ ch04.

html#Section4. 2), Section 4.3, Newton's Second Law (http:/ / www. lightandmatter. com/ html_books/ lm/

ch04/ ch04. html#Section4. 3), and Section 5.1, Newton's Third Law (http:/ / www. lightandmatter. com/

html_books/ lm/ ch05/ ch05. html#Section5. 1).

Feynman, R. P.; Leighton, R. B.; Sands, M. (2005). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.).

Pearson/Addison-Wesley. ISBN0-8053-9049-9.

Fowles, G. R.; Cassiday, G. L. (1999). Analytical Mechanics (6th ed.). Saunders College Publishing.

ISBN0-03-022317-2.

Likins, Peter W. (1973). Elements of Engineering Mechanics. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

ISBN0-07-037852-5.

Marion, Jerry; Thornton, Stephen (1995). Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems. Harcourt College

Publishers. ISBN0-03-097302-3.

Newton, Isaac, "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy", 1729 English translation based on 3rd Latin

edition (1726), volume 1, containing Book 1 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ),

especially at the section Axioms or Laws of Motion starting page 19 (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ& pg=PA19).

Newton, Isaac, "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy", 1729 English translation based on 3rd Latin

edition (1726), volume 2, containing Books 2 & 3 (http:/ / books. google. com/ books?id=6EqxPav3vIsC).

Thomson, W (Lord Kelvin), and Tait, P G, (1867), Treatise on natural philosophy (http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=wwO9X3RPt5kC), volume 1, especially at Section 242, Newton's laws of motion (http:/ / books.

google. com/ books?id=wwO9X3RPt5kC& pg=PA178).

NMJ Woodhouse (2003). Special relativity (http:/ / books. google. com/ ?id=ggPXQAeeRLgC&

printsec=frontcover& dq=isbn=1852334266#PPA6,M1). London/Berlin: Springer. p.6. ISBN1-85233-426-6.

External links

MIT Physics video lecture (http:/ / ocw. mit. edu/ OcwWeb/ Physics/ 8-01Physics-IFall1999/ VideoLectures/

detail/ Video-Segment-Index-for-L-6. htm) on Newton's three laws

Light and Matter (http:/ / www. lightandmatter. com/ lm/ ) an on-line textbook

Motion Mountain (http:/ / www. motionmountain. net) an on-line textbook

Simulation on Newton's first law of motion (http:/ / phy. hk/ wiki/ englishhtm/ firstlaw. htm)

" Newton's Second Law (http:/ / demonstrations. wolfram. com/ NewtonsSecondLaw/ )" by Enrique Zeleny,

Wolfram Demonstrations Project.

Newton's 3rd Law demonstrated in a vacuum (http:/ / www. youtube. com/ watch?v=9gFMObYCccU)

Writing of Principia Mathematica

107

Writing of Principia Mathematica

Isaac Newton composed Principia Mathematica during 1685 and 1686,

[1]

and it was published in a first edition on

July 5, 1687 and began changing the world. Widely regarded as one of the most important works in both the science

of physics and in applied mathematics during the Scientific revolution, the work underlies much of the technological

and scientific advances from the Industrial Revolution (usually dated from 1750) which its tools helped to create.

Authoring Principia

Work begins

Newton's own copy of his Principia, with hand written corrections

for the second edition.

In the other letters written in 1685 and 1686, he asks

Flamsteed for information about the orbits of the

moons of Jupiter and Saturn, the rise and fall of the

spring and neap tides at the solstices and the equinoxes,

about the flattening of Jupiter at the poles (which, if

certain, he says, would conduce much to the stating the

reasons of the precession of the equinoxes), and about

the universal application of Kepler's third law. "Your

information for Jupiter and Saturn has eased me of

several scruples. I was apt to suspect there might be

some cause or other unknown to me which might

disturb the sesquialtera proportion. For the influences

of the planets one upon another seemed not great

enough, though I imagined Jupiter's influence greater than your numbers determine it. It would add to my

satisfaction if you would be pleased to let me know the long diameters of the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn, assigned

by yourself and Mr Halley in your new tables, that I may see how the sesquiplicate proportion fills the heavens,

together with another small proportion which must be allowed for."

[2]

Upon Newton's return from Lincolnshire in the beginning of April 1685, he seems to have devoted himself to the

preparation of his work. In the spring he had determined the attractions of masses, and thus completed the law of

universal gravitation. In the summer he had finished the second book of the Principia, the first book being the

treatise De motu corporum in gyrum, which he had enlarged and completed. Except for correspondence with

Flamsteed we hear nothing more of the preparation of the Principia until April 21, 1686, when Halley read to the

Royal Society his Discourse concerning Gravity and its Properties, in which he states "that his worthy countryman

Mr Isaac Newton has an incomparable treatise of motion almost ready for the press," and that the law of the inverse

square "is the principle on which Mr Newton has made out all the phenomena of the celestial motions so easily and

naturally, that its truth is past dispute."

At the next meeting of the Society, on April 28, 1686, "Dr Vincent presented to the Society a manuscript treatise

entitled Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, and dedicated to the Society by Mr Isaac Newton." Although

this manuscript contained only the first book, yet such was the confidence the Society placed in the author that an

order was given "that a letter of thanks be written to Mr Newton; and that the printing of his book be referred to the

consideration of the council; and that in the meantime the book be put into the hands of Mr Halley, to make a report

thereof to the council."

Although there could be no doubt as to the intention of this report, no step was taken towards the publication of the

work. At the next meeting of the Society, on May 19, 1686, some dissatisfaction seems to have been expressed at the

delay, as it was ordered "that Mr Newton's work should be printed forthwith in quarto, and that a letter should be

Writing of Principia Mathematica

108

written to him to signify the Society's resolutions, and to desire his opinion as to the print, volume, cuts and so

forth." Three days afterwards Halley communicated the resolution to Newton, and stated to him that the printing was

to be at the charge of the Society. At the next meeting of the council, on June 2, 1686, it was again ordered "that Mr

Newton's book be printed," but, instead of sanctioning the resolution of the general meeting to print it at their charge,

they added "that Mr Halley undertake the business of looking after it, and printing it at his own charge, which he

engaged to do."

In order to explain to Newton the cause of the delay, Halley in his letter of May 22, 1686 alleges that it arose from

"the president's attendance on the king, and the absence of the vice-president's, whom the good weather had drawn

out of town"; but there is reason to believe that this was not the true cause, and that the unwillingness of the council

to undertake the publication arose from the state of the finances of the Society. Halley certainly deserves the

gratitude of posterity for undertaking the publication of the work at a very considerable financial risk to himself.

In the same letter Halley found it necessary to inform Newton of Hooke's conduct when the manuscript of the

Principia was presented to the Society. Sir John Hoskyns was in the chair when Dr Vincent presented the

manuscript, and praised the novelty and dignity of the subject. Hooke was offended because Sir John did not

mention what he had told him of his own discovery. Halley only communicated to Newton the fact "that Hooke had

some pretensions to the invention of the rule for the decrease of gravity being reciprocally as the squares of the

distances from the centre," acknowledging at the same time that, though Newton had the notion from him, "yet the

demonstration of the curves generated thereby belonged wholly to Newton." "How much of this," Halley adds, "is

so, you know best, so likewise what you have to do in this matter; only Mr Hooke seems to expect you should make

some mention of him in the preface, which 'tis possible you may see reason to prefix. I must beg your pardon that 'tis

I that send you this ungrateful account; but I thought it my duty to let you know it, so that you might act accordingly,

being in myself fully satisfied that nothing but the greatest candour imaginable is to be expected from a person who

has of all men the least need to borrow reputation."

A page from the Principia

In thus appealing to Newton's honesty, Halley obviously wished that

Newton should acknowledge Hooke in some way. Indeed, he knew

that before Newton had announced the inverse law, Hooke and Wren

and himself had spoken of it and discussed it, and therefore justice

demanded that Hooke especially should receive credit for having

maintained it as a truth of which he was seeking the demonstration,

even though none of them had given a demonstration of the law. On

June 20, 1686 Newton wrote to Halley the following letter:

"Sir, In order to let you know the case between Mr Hooke

and me, I give you an account of what passed between us

in our letters, so far as I could remember; for 'tis long since

they were writ, and I do not know that I have seen them

since. I am almost confident by circumstances, that Sir

Chr. Wren knew the duplicate proportion when I gave him

a visit; and then Mr Hooke (by his book Cometa written

afterwards) will prove the last of us three that knew it. I

intended in this letter to let you understand the case fully;

but it being a frivolous business, I shall content myself to

give you, the heads of it in short, viz, that I never extended the duplicate proportion lower than to the

superficies of the earth, and before a certain demonstration I found the last year, have suspected it did

not reach accurately enough down so low; and therefore in the doctrine of projectiles never used it nor

considered the motions of the heavens; and consequently Mr Hooke could not from my letters, which

were about projectiles and the regions descending hence to the centre, conclude me ignorant of the

Writing of Principia Mathematica

109

theory of the heavens. That what he told me of the duplicate proportion was erroneous, namely, that it

reached down from hence to the centre of the earth.

"That it is not candid to require me now to confess myself, in print, then ignorant of the duplicate

proportion in the heavens; for no other reason but because he had told it me in the case of projectiles,

and so upon mistaken grounds, accused me of that ignorance. That in my answer to his first letter I

refused his correspondence, told him I had laid philosophy aside, sent him, only the experiment of

projectiles (rather shortly hinted than carefully described), in compliment to sweeten my answer,

expected to hear no further from him; could scarce persuade myself to answer his second letter; did not

answer his third, was upon other things; thought no further of philosophical matters than, his letters put

me upon it, and therefore may be allowed not to have had my thoughts of that kind about me so well at

that time.

That by the same reason he concludes me then ignorant of the rest of the duplicate proportion, he may as

well conclude me ignorant of the rest of that theory I had read before in his books. That in one of my

papers writ (I cannot say in what year, but I am sure some time before I had any correspondence with

Mr Oldenburg, and that's above fifteen years ago), the proportion of the forces of the planets from the

sun, reciprocally duplicate of their distances from him, is expressed, and the proportion of our gravit to

the moon's conatus recedendi a centro terrae is calculated, though not accurately enough. That when

Hugenius put out his Horol. Oscill., a copy being presented to me, in my letter of thanks to him I gave

those rules in the end thereof a particular commendation for their usefulness in Philosophy, and added

out of my aforesaid paper an instance of their usefulness, in comparing the forces of the moon from the

earth, and earth from the sun; in determining a problem about the moon's phase, and putting a limit to

the sun's parallax, which shows that I had then my eye upon comparing the forces of the planets arising

from their circular motion, and understood it; so that a while after, when Mr Hooke propounded the

problem solemnly, in the end of his attempt to prove the motion of the earth, if I had not known the

duplicate proportion before, I could not but have found it now.

Between ten and eleven years ago there was an hypothesis of mine registered in your books, wherein I

hinted a cause of gravity towards the earth, sun and planets, with the dependence of the celestial motions

thereon; in which the proportion of the decrease of gravity from the superficies of the planet (though for

brevity's sake not there expressed) can be no other than reciprocally duplicate of the distance from the

centre. And I hope I shall not be urged to declare, in print, that I understood not the obvious

mathematical condition of my own hypothesis. But, grant I received it afterwards from Mr Hooke, yet

have I as great a right to it as to the ellipse. For as Kepler knew the orb to be not circular but oval, and

guessed it to be elliptical, so Mr Hooke, without knowing what I have found out since his letters to me,

can know no more, but that the proportion was duplicate quam proxim at great distances from the

centre, and only guessed it to be so accurately, and guessed amiss in extending that proportion down to

the very centre, whereas Kepler guessed right at the ellipse. And so, Mr Hooke found less of the

proportion than Kepler of the ellipse.

"There is so strong an objection against the accurateness of this proportion, that without my

demonstrations, to which Mr Hooke is yet a stranger, it cannot be believed by a judicious philosopher to

be any where accurate. And so, in stating this business, I do pretend to have done as much for the

proportion as for the ellipsis, and to have as much right to the one from Mr Hooke and all men, as to the

other from Kepler; and therefore on this account also he must at least moderate his pretences.

"The proof you sent me I like very well. I designed the whole to consist of three books; the second was

finished last summer being short, and only wants transcribing, and drawing the cuts fairly. Some new

propositions I have since thought on, which I can as well let alone. The third wants the theory of comets.

In autumn last I spent two months in calculations to no purpose for want of a good method, which made

Writing of Principia Mathematica

110

me afterwards return to the first book, and enlarge it with diverse propositions some relating to comets

others to other things, found out last winter. The third I now design to suppress. Philosophy is such an

impertinently litigious lady, that a man has as good be engaged in lawsuits, as have to do, with her. I

found it so formerly, and now I am no sooner come near her again, but she gives me warning. The two

first books, without the third, will not so well bear the title of Philosophiae Naturalis Principia

Mathematica; and therefore I had altered it to this, De Motu Corporum libri duo.

"But, upon second thoughts, I retain the former title. It will help the sale of the book, which I ought not

to diminish now it's yours. The articles are with the largest to be called by that name.

"If you please you may change the word to sections, though it be not material. In the first page, I have

struck out the words uti posthac docebitur as referring to the third book; which is all at present, from

your affectionate friend, and humble servant, "Is. NEWTON."

On June 20, 1686, Halley wrote to Newton:

"I am heartily sorry that in this matter, wherein all mankind ought to acknowledge their obligations to

you, you should meet with anything that should give you unquiet"; and then, after an account of Hooke's

claim to the discovery as made at a meeting of the Royal Society, he concludes: "But I found that they

were all of opinion that nothing thereof appearing in print, nor on the books of the Society, you ought to

be considered as the inventor. And if in truth he knew it before you, he ought not to blame any but

himself for having taken no more care to secure a discovery, which he puts so much value on. What

application he has made in private, I know not; but I am sure that the Society have a very great

satisfaction, in the honour you do them, by the dedication of so worthy a treatise.

Sir, I must now again beg you, not to let your resentments run so high, as to deprive us of your third

book, wherein the application of your mathematical doctrine to the theory of comets and several curious

experiments, which, as I guess by what you write, ought to compose it, will undoubtedly render it

acceptable to those, who will call themselves Philosophers without Mathematics, which are much the

greater number. Now you approve of the character and paper, I will push on the edition vigorously. I

have sometimes had thoughts of having the cuts neatly done in wood, so as to stand in the page with the

demonstrations. It will be more convenient, and not much more charge. If it please you to have it so, I

will try how well it can be done; otherwise I will have them in somewhat a larger size than those you

have sent up.

I am, Sir, your most affectionate humble servant, E. HALLEY."

On June 30, 1686 the council resolved to license Newton's book, entitled Philosophiae Naturalis Principia

Mathematica.

On July 14, 1686, Newton wrote to Halley approving of his proposal to introduce woodcuts among the letterpress,

stating clearly the differences which he had from Hooke, and adding, "And now having sincerely told you the case

between Mr Hooke and me, I hope I shall be free for the future from the prejudice of his letters. I have considered

how best to compose the present dispute, and I think it may be done by the inclosed scholium to the fourth

proposition." This scholium was "The inverse law of gravity holds in all the celestial motions, as was discovered also

independently by my countrymen Wren, Hooke and Halley." After this letter of Newton's the printing of the

Principia was begun. The second book, though ready for the press in the autumn of 1686, was not sent to the printers

until March 1687. The third book was presented to the Society, on April 6, and the whole work published about

midsummer in that year, July 5, 1687.

[3]

It was dedicated to the Royal Society, and to it was prefixed a set of Latin

hexameters addressed by Halley to the author. The work, as might have been expected, caused a great deal of

excitement throughout Europe, and the whole of the impression was very soon sold. In 1691 a copy of the Principia

was hard to obtain.

Writing of Principia Mathematica

111

Conflict between the University and James II

While Newton was writing the second and third books of the Principia, an event occurred at Cambridge which had

the effect of bringing him before the public. James II had in 1686 conferred the deanery of Christ Church at Oxford

on John Massey, a person whose sole qualification was that he was a member of the Church of Rome; and the king

had boasted to the pope's legate that "what he had done at Oxford would very soon be done at Cambridge." In

February 1687 James issued a mandate directing that Father Alban Francis, a Benedictine monk, should be admitted

a master of arts of the University of Cambridge, without taking the oaths of allegiance and supremacy.

Upon receiving the mandamus John Pechell, the master of Magdalene College, who was vice-chancellor, sent a

messenger to the Duke of Albemarle, the chancellor, to request him to get the mandamus recalled; and the registrary

and the bedell waited upon Francis to offer him instant admission to the degree if only he would take the necessary

oaths. A menacing letter was despatched by Sunderlandrespectful explanations were returned, but the university

showed no sign of compliance, nor suggested a compromise. The vice-chancellor and deputies from the senate were

summoned to appear before the High commission court at Westminster. Newton was one of the eight deputies

appointed by the senate for this purpose.

The deputies, before starting for London, held a meeting to prepare their case for the court. A compromise which

was put forward by one of them was resisted by Newton. On April 21 the deputation, with their case carefully

prepared, appeared before the court. Lord Jeffreys presided at the board. The deputation appeared as a matter of

course before the commissioners, and was dismissed. On April 27 they gave their plea. On May 7 it was discussed,

and feebly defended by the vice-chancellor. The deputies maintained that in the late reign several royal mandates had

been withdrawn, and that no degree had ever been conferred without the oaths having been previously taken. Jeffreys

spoke with his accustomed insolence to the vice-chancellor, silenced the other deputies when they offered to speak,

and ordered them out of court. When recalled the deputies were reprimanded, and Pechell was deprived of his office

as vice-chancellor, and of his salary as master of Magdalene.

Newton returned to Trinity College to complete the Principia. While thus occupied he had an extensive

correspondence with Halley, a very great part of which is extant. The following letter from Halley, dated London,

July 5, 1687, announcing the completion of the Principia, is of particular interest:

"I have at length brought your book to an end, and hope it will please you. The last errata came just in time to be

inserted. I will present from you the book you desire to the Royal Society, Mr Boyle, Mr Paget, Mr Flamsteed, and if

there be any else in town that you design to gratify that way; and I have sent you to bestow on your friends in the

University 20 copies, which I entreat you to accept. In the same parcel you will receive 40 more, which having no

acquaintance in Cambridge, I must entreat you to put into the hands of one or more of your ablest booksellers to

dispose of them. I intend the price of them, bound in calves' leather, and lettered, to be [OCR error] shillings here.

Those I send you I value in quires at 6 shillings, to take my money as they are sold, or at 5 sh. for ready, or else at

some short time; for I am satisfied there is no dealing in books without interesting the booksellers; and I am

contented to let them go halves with me, rather than have your excellent work smothered by their combinations. I

hope you will not repent you of the pains you have taken in so laudable a piece, so much to your own and the

nation's credit, but rather, after you shall have a little diverted yourself with other studies, that you will resume those

contemplations wherein you had so great success, and attempt the perfection of the lunar theory, which will be of

prodigious use in navigation, as well as of profound and public speculation. You will receive a box from me on

Thursday next by the wagon, that starts from town tomorrow."

Writing of Principia Mathematica

112

Illness in 1693

In 1692 and 1693 Newton seems to have had a serious illness, the nature of which has given rise to very considerable

dispute. In a letter dated the September 13, 1693, addressed to Samuel Pepys, he writes: "Some time after Mr

Millington had delivered your message, he pressed me to see you the next time I went to London. I was averse, but

upon his pressing consented, before I considered what I did, for I am extremely troubled at the embroilment I am in,

and have neither ate nor slept well this twelvemonth, nor have my former consistency of mind. I never designed to

get any thing by your interest, nor by icing James's favour, but am now sensible that I must withdraw from your

acquaintance, and see neither you nor the rest of my friends any more, if I may but have them quietly. I beg your

pardon for saying I would see you again, and rest your most humble and obedient servant." And in a letter written to

John Locke in reply to one of his about the second edition of his book, and dated the 15th of October 1693, Newton

wrote: "The last, winter, by sleeping too often by my fire, I got an ill habit of sleeping; and a distemper, which this

summer has been epidemical, put me farther out of order, so that when I wrote to you, I had not slept an hour a night

for a fortnight together, and for five days together not a wink. I remember I wrote to you, but what I said of your

book I remember not. If you please to send me a transcript of that passage, I will give you an account of it if I can."

The loss of sleep to a person of Newton's temperament, whose mind was never at rest, and at times so wholly

engrossed in his scientific pursuits that he even neglected to take food, must necessarily have led to a very great deal

of nervous excitability. It is not astonishing that rumours got abroad that there was a danger of his mind giving way,

or, according to a report which was believed at the time, that it had actually done so. Pepys must have heard such

rumours, as in a letter to his friend Millington, the tutor of Magdalene College at Cambridge, dated September 26,

1693, he wrote: "I must acknowledge myself not at the ease I would be glad to be at in reference to excellent Mr

Newton; concerning whom (methinks) your answer labours under the same kind of restraint which (to tell you the

truth) my asking did. For I was 10th at first dash to tell you that I had lately received a letter from him so surprising

to me for the inconsistency of every part of it, as to be put into great disorder by it, from the concern I have for him,

lest it should arise from that which of all mankind I should least dread from him and most lament for I mean a

discomposure in head, or mind, or both. Let me, therefore, beg you, Sir, having now told you the true ground of the

trouble I lately gave you, to let me know the very truth of the matter, as far at least as comes within your

knowledge."

On September 20, 1693, Millington wrote to Pepys that he had been to look for Newton some time before, but that

"he was out of town, and since," he says, "I have not seen him, till upon the 28th I met him at Huntingdon, where,

upon his own accord, and before I had time to ask him any question, he told me that he had written to you a very odd

letter, at which he was much concerned; added, that it was in a distemper that much seized his head, and that kept

him awake for above five nights together, which upon occasion he desired I would represent to you, and beg your

pardon, he being very much ashamed he should be so rude to a person for whom he hath so great an honour. He is

now very well, and though I fear he is under some small degree of melancholy, yet I think there is no reason to

suspect it hath at all touched his understanding, and I hope never will; and so I am sure all ought to wish that love

learning or the honour of our nation, which it is a sign how much it is looked after, when such a person as Mr

Newton lies so neglected by those in power."

The illness of Newton was very much exaggerated by foreign contemporary writers. Christiaan Huygens, in a letter

dated June 8, 1694, wrote to Leibniz, "I do not know if you are acquainted with the accident which has happened to

the good Mr Newton, namely, that he has had an attack of phrenitis, which lasted eighteen months, and of which

they say his friends have cured him by means of remedies, and keeping him shut up." To which Leibniz, in a letter

dated the 22nd of June, replied, "I am very glad that I received information of the cure of Mr Newton at the same

time that I first heard of his illness, which doubtless must have been very alarming."

Writing of Principia Mathematica

113

Initial election to Parliament

The active part which Newton had taken in defending the legal privileges of the university against the encroachments

of the crown had probably at least equal weight with his scientific reputation when his friends chose him as a

candidate for a seat in parliament as one of the representatives of the university. The other candidates were Sir

Robert Sawyer and Mr Finch. Sir Robert headed the poll with 125 votes, Newton next with 122 and Mr Finch was

last with 117 votes. Newton retained his seat only about a year, from January 1689 till the dissolution of the

Coventry Parliament in February 1690. During this time Newton does not appear to have taken part in any of the

debates in the House, but he was not neglectful of his duties as a member. On April 30, 1689 he moved for leave to

bring in a bill to settle the charters and privileges of the University of Cambridge, just as Sir Thomas Clarges did for

Oxford at the same time, and he wrote a series of letters to Dr Lovel, the vice-chancellor of the university, on points

which affected the interests of the university and its members.

Some of the members of the university who had sworn allegiance to James had some difficulty in swearing

allegiance to his successor. On February 12, 1689, the day of the coronation of William and Mary, Newton intimated

to the vice-chancellor that he would soon receive an order to proclaim them at Cambridge. He enclosed a form of the

proclamation, and expressed a hearty "wish that the university would so compose themselves as to perform the

solemnity with a reasonable decorum."

References

[1] For information on Newton's later life and post-Principia work, see Isaac Newton's later life.

[2] [2] (Letter of mid-January (before 14th) 1684|1685 (Old Style), published as #537 in Vol.2 of "The Correspondence of John Flamsteed", ed. E.G.

Forbes et al., 1997. (This reference was supplied after original compilation of the present article, and gives original spellings; but most

spellings and punctuations in the text above have been modernised. The words 'sesquialtera' and 'sesquiplicate', now archaic, refer to the

relation between a given number and the same multiplied by its own square root: or to the square root of its cube, which comes to the same

thing: the 'one-and-a-half-th' power, as it were.)

[3] Richard S. Westfall, Never at Rest, ISBN 0-521-27435-4 (paperback) Cambridge 1980..1998.

Method of Fluxions

114

Method of Fluxions

Method of Fluxions is a book by Isaac Newton. The book was completed in 1671, and published in 1736. Fluxions

is Newton's term for differential calculus (fluents was his term for integral calculus). He originally developed the

method at Woolsthorpe Manor during the closing of Cambridge during the Great Plague of London from 1665 to

1667, but did not choose to make his findings known (similarly, his findings which eventually became the

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica were developed at this time and hidden from the world in Newton's

notes for many years). Gottfried Leibniz developed his calculus around 1673, and published it in 1684, fifty years

before Newton. The calculus notation we use today is mostly that of Leibniz, although Newton's dot notation for

differentiation for denoting derivatives with respect to time is still in current use throughout mechanics and circuit

analysis.

Newton's Method of Fluxions was formally published posthumously, but following Leibniz's publication of the

calculus a bitter rivalry erupted between the two mathematicians over who had developed the calculus first and so

Newton no longer hid his knowledge of fluxions.

External links

Method of Fluxions

[1]

at the Internet Archive

References

[1] http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/ methodoffluxions00newt

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Born July 1, 1646

Leipzig, Electorate of Saxony, Holy Roman Empire

Died November 14, 1716 (aged70)

Hanover, Electorate of Hanover, Holy Roman Empire

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

115

Nationality German

Era 17th-/18th-century philosophy

Region Western Philosophy

Maininterests Mathematics, metaphysics, logic, theodicy, universal language

Notableideas

Infinitesimal calculus

Monads

Best of all possible worlds

Leibniz formula for

Leibniz harmonic triangle

Leibniz formula for determinants

Leibniz integral rule

Principle of sufficient reason

Diagrammatic reasoning

Notation for differentiation

Proof of Fermat's little theorem

Kinetic energy

Entscheidungsproblem

AST

Law of Continuity

Transcendental Law of Homogeneity

Characteristica universalis

Ars combinatoria

Calculus ratiocinator

Universalwissenschaft

[2]

Signature

Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (German: [tfit vlhlm fn labnts]

[3]

or [lapnts]

[4]

) (July 1, 1646

November 14, 1716) was a German mathematician and philosopher. He occupies a prominent place in the history of

mathematics and the history of philosophy.

Leibniz developed the infinitesimal calculus independently of Isaac Newton, and Leibniz's mathematical notation

has been widely used ever since it was published. His visionary Law of Continuity and Transcendental Law of

Homogeneity only found mathematical implementation in the 20th century. He became one of the most prolific

inventors in the field of mechanical calculators. While working on adding automatic multiplication and division to

Pascal's calculator, he was the first to describe a pinwheel calculator in 1685

[5]

and invented the Leibniz wheel, used

in the arithmometer, the first mass-produced mechanical calculator. He also refined the binary number system, which

is at the foundation of virtually all digital computers.

In philosophy, Leibniz is mostly noted for his optimism, e.g., his conclusion that our Universe is, in a restricted

sense, the best possible one that God could have created. Leibniz, along with Ren Descartes and Baruch Spinoza,

was one of the three great 17th century advocates of rationalism. The work of Leibniz anticipated modern logic and

analytic philosophy, but his philosophy also looks back to the scholastic tradition, in which conclusions are produced

by applying reason to first principles or prior definitions rather than to empirical evidence. Leibniz made major

contributions to physics and technology, and anticipated notions that surfaced much later in philosophy, probability

theory, biology, medicine, geology, psychology, linguistics, and information science. He wrote works on philosophy,

politics, law, ethics, theology, history, and philology. Leibniz's contributions to this vast array of subjects were

scattered in various learned journals, in tens of thousands of letters, and in unpublished manuscripts. He wrote in

several languages, but primarily in Latin, French, and German.

[6]

As of 2013, there is no complete gathering of the

writings of Leibniz.

[7]

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

116

Biography

Early life

Gottfried Leibniz was born on July 1, 1646 in Leipzig, Saxony (at the end of the Thirty Years' War), to Friedrich

Leibniz and Catharina Schmuck. Friedrich noted in his family journal: "On Sunday 21 June [NS: 1 July] 1646, my

son Gottfried Wilhelm is born into the world after six in the evening, to seven [ein Viertel uff sieben], Aquarius

rising."

[8]

His father (a German of Sorbian ancestry

[9]

) died when Leibniz was six years old, and from that point on

he was raised by his mother. Her teachings influenced Leibniz's philosophical thoughts in his later life.

Leibniz's father had been a Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Leipzig and Leibniz inherited his

father's personal library. He was given free access to this from the age of seven. While Leibniz's schoolwork focused

on a small canon of authorities, his father's library enabled him to study a wide variety of advanced philosophical

and theological works ones that he would not have otherwise been able to read until his college years.

[10]

Access to

his father's library, largely written in Latin, also led to his proficiency in the Latin language. Leibniz was proficient

in Latin by the age of 12, and he composed three hundred hexameters of Latin verse in a single morning for a special

event at school at the age of 13.

[11]

He enrolled in his father's former university at age 15,

[12]

and he completed his bachelor's degree in philosophy in

December 1662. He defended his Disputatio Metaphysica de Principio Individui, which addressed the principle of

individuation, on June 9, 1663. Leibniz earned his master's degree in philosophy on February 7, 1664. He published

and defended a dissertation Specimen Quaestionum Philosophicarum ex Jure collectarum, arguing for both a

theoretical and a pedagogical relationship between philosophy and law, in December 1664. After one year of legal

studies, he was awarded his bachelor's degree in Law on September 28, 1665.

In 1666, at age 20, Leibniz published his first book, On the Art of Combinations, the first part of which was also his

habilitation thesis in philosophy. His next goal was to earn his license and doctorate in Law, which normally

required three years of study then. In 1666, the University of Leipzig turned down Leibniz's doctoral application and

refused to grant him a doctorate in law, most likely due to his relative youth (he was 21 years old at the time).

[13]

Leibniz subsequently left Leipzig.

[14]

Leibniz then enrolled in the University of Altdorf, and almost immediately he submitted a thesis, which he had

probably been working on earlier in Leipzig.

[15]

The title of his thesis was Disputatio Inauguralis De Casibus

Perplexis In Jure. Leibniz earned his license to practice law and his Doctorate in Law in November 1666. He next

declined the offer of an academic appointment at Altdorf, saying that "my thoughts were turned in an entirely

different direction.

[16]

As an adult, Leibniz often introduced himself as "Gottfried von Leibniz". Also many posthumously published

editions of his writings presented his name on the title page as "Freiherr G. W. von Leibniz." However, no document

has ever been found from any contemporary government that stated his appointment to any form of nobility.

[17]

166674

Leibniz's first position was as a salaried alchemist in Nuremberg, though he may have only known fairly little about

the subject at that time.

[18]

He soon met Johann Christian von Boyneburg (16221672), the dismissed chief minister

of the Elector of Mainz, Johann Philipp von Schnborn.

[19]

Von Boyneburg hired Leibniz as an assistant, and shortly

thereafter reconciled with the Elector and introduced Leibniz to him. Leibniz then dedicated an essay on law to the

Elector in the hope of obtaining employment. The stratagem worked; the Elector asked Leibniz to assist with the

redrafting of the legal code for his Electorate.

[20]

In 1669, Leibniz was appointed Assessor in the Court of Appeal.

Although von Boyneburg died late in 1672, Leibniz remained under the employment of his widow until she

dismissed him in 1674.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

117

Von Boyneburg did much to promote Leibniz's reputation, and the latter's memoranda and letters began to attract

favorable notice. Leibniz's service to the Elector soon followed a diplomatic role. He published an essay, under the

pseudonym of a fictitious Polish nobleman, arguing (unsuccessfully) for the German candidate for the Polish crown.

The main force in European geopolitics during Leibniz's adult life was the ambition of Louis XIV of France, backed

by French military and economic might. Meanwhile, the Thirty Years' War had left German-speaking Europe

exhausted, fragmented, and economically backward. Leibniz proposed to protect German-speaking Europe by

distracting Louis as follows. France would be invited to take Egypt as a stepping stone towards an eventual conquest

of the Dutch East Indies. In return, France would agree to leave Germany and the Netherlands undisturbed. This plan

obtained the Elector's cautious support. In 1672, the French government invited Leibniz to Paris for discussion,

[21]

but the plan was soon overtaken by the outbreak of the Franco-Dutch War and became irrelevant. Napoleon's failed

invasion of Egypt in 1798 can be seen as an unwitting implementation of Leibniz's plan.

Thus Leibniz began several years in Paris. Soon after arriving, he met Dutch physicist and mathematician Christiaan

Huygens and realised that his own knowledge of mathematics and physics was patchy. With Huygens as mentor, he

began a program of self-study that soon pushed him to making major contributions to both subjects, including

inventing his version of the differential and integral calculus. He met Nicolas Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld, the

leading French philosophers of the day, and studied the writings of Descartes and Pascal, unpublished as well as

published. He befriended a German mathematician, Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus; they corresponded for the

rest of their lives. In 1675 he was admitted by the French Academy of Sciences as a foreign honorary member,

despite his lack of attention to the academy.

Stepped Reckoner

When it became clear that France would not implement

its part of Leibniz's Egyptian plan, the Elector sent his

nephew, escorted by Leibniz, on a related mission to

the English government in London, early in 1673.

[22]

There Leibniz came into acquaintance of Henry

Oldenburg and John Collins. He met with the Royal

Society where he demonstrated a calculating machine

that he had designed and had been building since 1670.

The machine was able to execute all four basic

operations (adding, subtracting, multiplying, and

dividing), and the Society quickly made him an

external member. The mission ended abruptly when

news reached it of the Elector's death, whereupon

Leibniz promptly returned to Paris and not, as had been

planned, to Mainz.

[23]

The sudden deaths of Leibniz's two patrons in the same winter meant that Leibniz had to find a new basis for his

career. In this regard, a 1669 invitation from the Duke of Brunswick to visit Hanover proved fateful. Leibniz

declined the invitation, but began corresponding with the Duke in 1671. In 1673, the Duke offered him the post of

Counsellor which Leibniz very reluctantly accepted two years later, only after it became clear that no employment in

Paris, whose intellectual stimulation he relished, or with the Habsburg imperial court was forthcoming.

House of Hanover, 16761716

Leibniz managed to delay his arrival in Hanover until the end of 1676 after making one more short journey to

London, where he was later accused by Newton of being shown some of Newton's unpublished work on the

calculus.

[24]

This fact was deemed evidence supporting the accusation, made decades later, that he had stolen the

calculus from Newton. On the journey from London to Hanover, Leibniz stopped in The Hague where he met

Leeuwenhoek, the discoverer of microorganisms. He also spent several days in intense discussion with Spinoza, who

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

118

had just completed his masterwork, the Ethics.

[25]

Leibniz respected Spinoza's powerful intellect, but was dismayed

by his conclusions that contradicted both Christian and Jewish orthodoxy.

In 1677, he was promoted, at his request, to Privy Counselor of Justice, a post he held for the rest of his life. Leibniz

served three consecutive rulers of the House of Brunswick as historian, political adviser, and most consequentially,

as librarian of the ducal library. He thenceforth employed his pen on all the various political, historical, and

theological matters involving the House of Brunswick; the resulting documents form a valuable part of the historical

record for the period.

Among the few people in north Germany to accept Leibniz were the Electress Sophia of Hanover (16301714), her

daughter Sophia Charlotte of Hanover (16681705), the Queen of Prussia and his avowed disciple, and Caroline of

Ansbach, the consort of her grandson, the future George II. To each of these women he was correspondent, adviser,

and friend. In turn, they all approved of Leibniz more than did their spouses and the future king George I of Great

Britain.

[26]

The population of Hanover was only about 10,000, and its provinciality eventually grated on Leibniz. Nevertheless,

to be a major courtier to the House of Brunswick was quite an honor, especially in light of the meteoric rise in the

prestige of that House during Leibniz's association with it. In 1692, the Duke of Brunswick became a hereditary

Elector of the Holy Roman Empire. The British Act of Settlement 1701 designated the Electress Sophia and her

descent as the royal family of England, once both King William III and his sister-in-law and successor, Queen Anne,

were dead. Leibniz played a role in the initiatives and negotiations leading up to that Act, but not always an effective

one. For example, something he published anonymously in England, thinking to promote the Brunswick cause, was

formally censured by the British Parliament.

The Brunswicks tolerated the enormous effort Leibniz devoted to intellectual pursuits unrelated to his duties as a

courtier, pursuits such as perfecting the calculus, writing about other mathematics, logic, physics, and philosophy,

and keeping up a vast correspondence. He began working on the calculus in 1674; the earliest evidence of its use in

his surviving notebooks is 1675. By 1677 he had a coherent system in hand, but did not publish it until 1684.

Leibniz's most important mathematical papers were published between 1682 and 1692, usually in a journal which he

and Otto Mencke founded in 1682, the Acta Eruditorum. That journal played a key role in advancing his

mathematical and scientific reputation, which in turn enhanced his eminence in diplomacy, history, theology, and

philosophy.

The Elector Ernest Augustus commissioned Leibniz to write a history of the House of Brunswick, going back to the

time of Charlemagne or earlier, hoping that the resulting book would advance his dynastic ambitions. From 1687 to

1690, Leibniz traveled extensively in Germany, Austria, and Italy, seeking and finding archival materials bearing on

this project. Decades went by but no history appeared; the next Elector became quite annoyed at Leibniz's apparent

dilatoriness. Leibniz never finished the project, in part because of his huge output on many other fronts, but also

because he insisted on writing a meticulously researched and erudite book based on archival sources, when his

patrons would have been quite happy with a short popular book, one perhaps little more than a genealogy with

commentary, to be completed in three years or less. They never knew that he had in fact carried out a fair part of his

assigned task: when the material Leibniz had written and collected for his history of the House of Brunswick was

finally published in the 19th century, it filled three volumes.

In 1708, John Keill, writing in the journal of the Royal Society and with Newton's presumed blessing, accused

Leibniz of having plagiarized Newton's calculus.

[27]

Thus began the calculus priority dispute which darkened the

remainder of Leibniz's life. A formal investigation by the Royal Society (in which Newton was an unacknowledged

participant), undertaken in response to Leibniz's demand for a retraction, upheld Keill's charge. Historians of

mathematics writing since 1900 or so have tended to acquit Leibniz, pointing to important differences between

Leibniz's and Newton's versions of the calculus.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

119

Leibniz's correspondence, papers and notes from 1669-1704,

National Library of Poland.

In 1711, while traveling in northern Europe, the

Russian Tsar Peter the Great stopped in Hanover and

met Leibniz, who then took some interest in Russian

matters for the rest of his life. In 1712, Leibniz began a

two-year residence in Vienna, where he was appointed

Imperial Court Councillor to the Habsburgs. On the

death of Queen Anne in 1714, Elector George Louis

became King George I of Great Britain, under the terms

of the 1701 Act of Settlement. Even though Leibniz

had done much to bring about this happy event, it was

not to be his hour of glory. Despite the intercession of

the Princess of Wales, Caroline of Ansbach, George I

forbade Leibniz to join him in London until he

completed at least one volume of the history of the

Brunswick family his father had commissioned nearly

30 years earlier. Moreover, for George I to include

Leibniz in his London court would have been deemed insulting to Newton, who was seen as having won the calculus

priority dispute and whose standing in British official circles could not have been higher. Finally, his dear friend and

defender, the Dowager Electress Sophia, died in 1714.

Death

Leibniz died in Hanover in 1716: at the time, he was so out of favor that neither George I (who happened to be near

Hanover at the time) nor any fellow courtier other than his personal secretary attended the funeral. Even though

Leibniz was a life member of the Royal Society and the Berlin Academy of Sciences, neither organization saw fit to

honor his passing. His grave went unmarked for more than 50 years. Leibniz was eulogized by Fontenelle, before the

Academie des Sciences in Paris, which had admitted him as a foreign member in 1700. The eulogy was composed at

the behest of the Duchess of Orleans, a niece of the Electress Sophia.

Personal life

Leibniz never married. He complained on occasion about money, but the fair sum he left to his sole heir, his sister's

stepson, proved that the Brunswicks had, by and large, paid him well. In his diplomatic endeavors, he at times

verged on the unscrupulous, as was all too often the case with professional diplomats of his day. On several

occasions, Leibniz backdated and altered personal manuscripts, actions which put him in a bad light during the

calculus controversy. On the other hand, he was charming, well-mannered, and not without humor and

imagination.

[28]

He had many friends and admirers all over Europe. On Leibniz's religious views, although he is

considered by some biographers as a deist since he did not believe in miracles and believed that Jesus Christ has no

real role in the universe, he was nonetheless a theist.

[29][30][31][32]

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

120

Philosopher

Leibniz's philosophical thinking appears fragmented, because his philosophical writings consist mainly of a

multitude of short pieces: journal articles, manuscripts published long after his death, and many letters to many

correspondents. He wrote only two book-length philosophical treatises, of which only the Thodice of 1710 was

published in his lifetime.

Leibniz dated his beginning as a philosopher to his Discourse on Metaphysics, which he composed in 1686 as a

commentary on a running dispute between Nicolas Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld. This led to an extensive and

valuable correspondence with Arnauld;

[33]

it and the Discourse were not published until the 19th century. In 1695,

Leibniz made his public entre into European philosophy with a journal article titled "New System of the Nature and

Communication of Substances".

[34]

Between 1695 and 1705, he composed his New Essays on Human

Understanding, a lengthy commentary on John Locke's 1690 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, but upon

learning of Locke's 1704 death, lost the desire to publish it, so that the New Essays were not published until 1765.

The Monadologie, composed in 1714 and published posthumously, consists of 90 aphorisms.

Leibniz met Spinoza in 1676, read some of his unpublished writings, and has since been suspected of appropriating

some of Spinoza's ideas. While Leibniz admired Spinoza's powerful intellect, he was also forthrightly dismayed by

Spinoza's conclusions,

[35]

especially when these were inconsistent with Christian orthodoxy.

Unlike Descartes and Spinoza, Leibniz had a thorough university education in philosophy. He was influenced by his

Leipzig professor Jakob Thomasius, who also supervised his BA thesis in philosophy. Leibniz also eagerly read

Francisco Surez, a Spanish Jesuit respected even in Lutheran universities. Leibniz was deeply interested in the new

methods and conclusions of Descartes, Huygens, Newton, and Boyle, but viewed their work through a lens heavily

tinted by scholastic notions. Yet it remains the case that Leibniz's methods and concerns often anticipate the logic,

and analytic and linguistic philosophy of the 20th century.

The Principles

Leibniz variously invoked one or another of seven fundamental philosophical Principles:

[36]

Identity/contradiction. If a proposition is true, then its negation is false and vice versa.

Identity of indiscernibles. Two distinct things cannot have all their properties in common. If every predicate

possessed by x is also possessed by y and vice versa, then entities x and y are identical; to suppose two things

indiscernible is to suppose the same thing under two names. Frequently invoked in modern logic and philosophy.

The "identity of indiscernibles" is often referred to as Leibniz's Law. It has attracted the most controversy and

criticism, especially from corpuscular philosophy and quantum mechanics.

Sufficient reason. "There must be a sufficient reason [often known only to God] for anything to exist, for any

event to occur, for any truth to obtain."

[37]

Pre-established harmony.

[38]

"[T]he appropriate nature of each substance brings it about that what happens to one

corresponds to what happens to all the others, without, however, their acting upon one another directly."

(Discourse on Metaphysics, XIV) A dropped glass shatters because it "knows" it has hit the ground, and not

because the impact with the ground "compels" the glass to split.

Law of Continuity. Natura non saltum facit.

Optimism. "God assuredly always chooses the best."

[39]

Plenitude. "Leibniz believed that the best of all possible worlds would actualize every genuine possibility, and

argued in Thodice that this best of all possible worlds will contain all possibilities, with our finite experience of

eternity giving no reason to dispute nature's perfection."

Leibniz would on occasion give a rational defense of a specific principle, but more often took them for granted.

[40]

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

121

The monads

Leibniz's best known contribution to metaphysics is his theory of monads, as exposited in Monadologie. According

to Leibniz, monads are elementary particles with blurred perception of each other. Monads can also be compared to

the corpuscles of the Mechanical Philosophy of Ren Descartes and others. Monads are the ultimate elements of the

universe. The monads are "substantial forms of being" with the following properties: they are eternal,

indecomposable, individual, subject to their own laws, un-interacting, and each reflecting the entire universe in a

pre-established harmony (a historically important example of panpsychism). Monads are centers of force; substance

is force, while space, matter, and motion are merely phenomenal.

The ontological essence of a monad is its irreducible simplicity. Unlike atoms, monads possess no material or spatial

character. They also differ from atoms by their complete mutual independence, so that interactions among monads

are only apparent. Instead, by virtue of the principle of pre-established harmony, each monad follows a

preprogrammed set of "instructions" peculiar to itself, so that a monad "knows" what to do at each moment. (These

"instructions" may be seen as analogs of the scientific laws governing subatomic particles.) By virtue of these

intrinsic instructions, each monad is like a little mirror of the universe. Monads need not be "small"; e.g., each

human being constitutes a monad, in which case free will is problematic. God, too, is a monad, and the existence of

God can be inferred from the harmony prevailing among all other monads; God wills the pre-established harmony.

Monads are purported to have gotten rid of the problematic:

Interaction between mind and matter arising in the system of Descartes;

Lack of individuation inherent to the system of Spinoza, which represents individual creatures as merely

accidental.

Theodicy and optimism

(Note that the word "optimism" here is used in the classic sense of optimal, not in the mood-related sense, as being

positively hopeful.)

The Theodicy

[41]

tries to justify the apparent imperfections of the world by claiming that it is optimal among all

possible worlds. It must be the best possible and most balanced world, because it was created by an all powerful and

all knowing God, who would not choose to create an imperfect world if a better world could be known to him or

possible to exist. In effect, apparent flaws that can be identified in this world must exist in every possible world,

because otherwise God would have chosen to create the world that excluded those flaws.

Leibniz asserted that the truths of theology (religion) and philosophy cannot contradict each other, since reason and

faith are both "gifts of God" so that their conflict would imply God contending against himself. The Theodicy is

Leibniz's attempt to reconcile his personal philosophical system with his interpretation of the tenets of

Christianity.

[42]

This project was motivated in part by Leibniz's belief, shared by many conservative philosophers

and theologians during the Enlightenment, in the rational and enlightened nature of the Christian religion, at least as

this was defined in tendentious comparisons between Christian and non Western or "primitive" religious practices

and beliefs. It was also shaped by Leibniz's belief in the perfectibility of human nature (if humanity relied on correct

philosophy and religion as a guide), and by his belief that metaphysical necessity must have a rational or logical

foundation, even if this metaphysical causality seemed inexplicable in terms of physical necessity (the natural laws

identified by science).

Because reason and faith must be entirely reconciled, any tenet of faith which could not be defended by reason must

be rejected. Leibniz then approached one of the central criticisms of Christian theism:

[43]

if God is all good, all wise

and all powerful, how did evil come into the world? The answer (according to Leibniz) is that, while God is indeed

unlimited in wisdom and power, his human creations, as creations, are limited both in their wisdom and in their will

(power to act). This predisposes humans to false beliefs, wrong decisions and ineffective actions in the exercise of

their free will. God does not arbitrarily inflict pain and suffering on humans; rather he permits both moral evil (sin)

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

122

and physical evil (pain and suffering) as the necessary consequences of metaphysical evil (imperfection), as a means

by which humans can identify and correct their erroneous decisions, and as a contrast to true good.

Further, although human actions flow from prior causes that ultimately arise in God, and therefore are known as a

metaphysical certainty to God, an individual's free will is exercised within natural laws, where choices are merely

contingently necessary, to be decided in the event by a "wonderful spontaneity" that provides individuals an escape

from rigorous predestination.

This theory drew controversy and refutations, that are collected in the article Best of all possible worlds.

Symbolic thought

Leibniz believed that much of human reasoning could be reduced to calculations of a sort, and that such calculations

could resolve many differences of opinion:

The only way to rectify our reasonings is to make them as tangible as those of the Mathematicians, so

that we can find our error at a glance, and when there are disputes among persons, we can simply say:

Let us calculate [calculemus], without further ado, to see who is right.

[44]

Leibniz's calculus ratiocinator, which resembles symbolic logic, can be viewed as a way of making such calculations

feasible. Leibniz wrote memoranda

[45]

that can now be read as groping attempts to get symbolic logicand thus his

calculusoff the ground. But Gerhard and Couturat did not publish these writings until modern formal logic had

emerged in Frege's Begriffsschrift and in writings by Charles Sanders Peirce and his students in the 1880s, and hence

well after Boole and De Morgan began that logic in 1847.

Leibniz thought symbols were important for human understanding. He attached so much importance to the invention

of good notations that he attributed all his discoveries in mathematics to this. His notation for the infinitesimal

calculus is an example of his skill in this regard. C.S. Peirce, a 19th-century pioneer of semiotics, shared Leibniz's

passion for symbols and notation, and his belief that these are essential to a well-running logic and mathematics.

But Leibniz took his speculations much further. Defining a character as any written sign, he then defined a "real"

character as one that represents an idea directly and not simply as the word embodying the idea. Some real

characters, such as the notation of logic, serve only to facilitate reasoning. Many characters well known in his day,

including Egyptian hieroglyphics, Chinese characters, and the symbols of astronomy and chemistry, he deemed not

real.

[46]

Instead, he proposed the creation of a characteristica universalis or "universal characteristic", built on an

alphabet of human thought in which each fundamental concept would be represented by a unique "real" character:

It is obvious that if we could find characters or signs suited for expressing all our thoughts as clearly and

as exactly as arithmetic expresses numbers or geometry expresses lines, we could do in all matters

insofar as they are subject to reasoning all that we can do in arithmetic and geometry. For all

investigations which depend on reasoning would be carried out by transposing these characters and by a

species of calculus.

[47]

Complex thoughts would be represented by combining characters for simpler thoughts. Leibniz saw that the

uniqueness of prime factorization suggests a central role for prime numbers in the universal characteristic, a striking

anticipation of Gdel numbering. Granted, there is no intuitive or mnemonic way to number any set of elementary

concepts using the prime numbers. Leibniz's idea of reasoning through a universal language of symbols and

calculations however remarkably foreshadows great 20th century developments in formal systems, such as Turing

completeness, where computation was used to define equivalent universal languages (see Turing degree).

Because Leibniz was a mathematical novice when he first wrote about the characteristic, at first he did not conceive

it as an algebra but rather as a universal language or script. Only in 1676 did he conceive of a kind of "algebra of

thought", modeled on and including conventional algebra and its notation. The resulting characteristic included a

logical calculus, some combinatorics, algebra, his analysis situs (geometry of situation), a universal concept

language, and more.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

123

What Leibniz actually intended by his characteristica universalis and calculus ratiocinator, and the extent to which

modern formal logic does justice to the calculus, may never be established.

[48]

Formal logic

Leibniz is the most important logician between Aristotle and 1847, when George Boole and Augustus De Morgan

each published books that began modern formal logic. Leibniz enunciated the principal properties of what we now

call conjunction, disjunction, negation, identity, set inclusion, and the empty set. The principles of Leibniz's logic

and, arguably, of his whole philosophy, reduce to two:

1. All our ideas are compounded from a very small number of simple ideas, which form the alphabet of human

thought.

2. 2. Complex ideas proceed from these simple ideas by a uniform and symmetrical combination, analogous to

arithmetical multiplication.

The formal logic that emerged early in the 20th century also requires, at minimum, unary negation and quantified

variables ranging over some universe of discourse.

Leibniz published nothing on formal logic in his lifetime; most of what he wrote on the subject consists of working

drafts. In his book History of Western Philosophy, Bertrand Russell went so far as to claim that Leibniz had

developed logic in his unpublished writings to a level which was reached only 200 years later.

Mathematician

Although the mathematical notion of function was implicit in trigonometric and logarithmic tables, which existed in

his day, Leibniz was the first, in 1692 and 1694, to employ it explicitly, to denote any of several geometric concepts

derived from a curve, such as abscissa, ordinate, tangent, chord, and the perpendicular.

[49]

In the 18th century,

"function" lost these geometrical associations.

Leibniz was the first to see that the coefficients of a system of linear equations could be arranged into an array, now

called a matrix, which can be manipulated to find the solution of the system, if any. This method was later called

Gaussian elimination. Leibniz's discoveries of Boolean algebra and of symbolic logic, also relevant to mathematics,

are discussed in the preceding section. The best overview of Leibniz's writings on the calculus may be found in Bos

(1974).

[50]

Calculus

Leibniz is credited, along with Sir Isaac Newton, with the invention of infinitesimal calculus (that comprises

differential and integral calculus). According to Leibniz's notebooks, a critical breakthrough occurred on November

11, 1675, when he employed integral calculus for the first time to find the area under the graph of a function y=(x).

He introduced several notations used to this day, for instance the integral sign representing an elongated S, from

the Latin word summa and the d used for differentials, from the Latin word differentia. This cleverly suggestive

notation for the calculus is probably his most enduring mathematical legacy. Leibniz did not publish anything about

his calculus until 1684.

[51]

The product rule of differential calculus is still called "Leibniz's law". In addition, the

theorem that tells how and when to differentiate under the integral sign is called the Leibniz integral rule.

Leibniz exploited infinitesimals in developing the calculus, manipulating them in ways suggesting that they had

paradoxical algebraic properties. George Berkeley, in a tract called The Analyst and also in De Motu, criticized these.

A recent study argues that Leibnizian calculus was free of contradictions, and was better grounded than Berkeley's

empiricist criticisms.

[52]

From 1711 until his death, Leibniz was engaged in a dispute with John Keill, Newton and others, over whether

Leibniz had invented the calculus independently of Newton. This subject is treated at length in the article

Leibniz-Newton controversy.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

124

Infinitesimals were officially banned from mathematics by the followers of Karl Weierstrass, but survived in science

and engineering, and even in rigorous mathematics, via the fundamental computational device known as the

differential. Beginning in 1960, Abraham Robinson worked out a rigorous foundation for Leibniz's infinitesimals,

using model theory, in the context of a field of hyperreal numbers. The resulting non-standard analysis can be seen

as a belated vindication of Leibniz's mathematical reasoning. Robinson's transfer principle is a mathematical

implementation of Leibniz's heuristic law of continuity, while the standard part function implements the Leibnizian

transcendental law of homogeneity.

Topology

Leibniz was the first to use the term analysis situs,

[53]

later used in the 19th century to refer to what is now known as

topology. There are two takes on this situation. On the one hand, Mates, citing a 1954 paper in German by Jacob

Freudenthal, argues:

Although for Leibniz the situs of a sequence of points is completely determined by the distance between

them and is altered if those distances are altered, his admirer Euler, in the famous 1736 paper solving the

Knigsberg Bridge Problem and its generalizations, used the term geometria situs in such a sense that

the situs remains unchanged under topological deformations. He mistakenly credits Leibniz with

originating this concept. ...it is sometimes not realized that Leibniz used the term in an entirely different

sense and hence can hardly be considered the founder of that part of mathematics.

[54]

But Hideaki Hirano argues differently, quoting Mandelbrot:

[55]

To sample Leibniz' scientific works is a sobering experience. Next to calculus, and to other thoughts that

have been carried out to completion, the number and variety of premonitory thrusts is overwhelming.

We saw examples in 'packing,'...My Leibniz mania is further reinforced by finding that for one moment

its hero attached importance to geometric scaling. In "Euclidis Prota"..., which is an attempt to tighten

Euclid's axioms, he states,...: 'I have diverse definitions for the straight line. The straight line is a curve,

any part of which is similar to the whole, and it alone has this property, not only among curves but

among sets.' This claim can be proved today.

[56]

Thus the fractal geometry promoted by Mandelbrot drew on Leibniz's notions of self-similarity and the principle of

continuity: natura non facit saltus. We also see that when Leibniz wrote, in a metaphysical vein, that "the straight

line is a curve, any part of which is similar to the whole", he was anticipating topology by more than two centuries.

As for "packing", Leibniz told to his friend and correspondent Des Bosses to imagine a circle, then to inscribe within

it three congruent circles with maximum radius; the latter smaller circles could be filled with three even smaller

circles by the same procedure. This process can be continued infinitely, from which arises a good idea of

self-similarity. Leibniz's improvement of Euclid's axiom contains the same concept.

Scientist and engineer

Leibniz's writings are currently discussed, not only for their anticipations and possible discoveries not yet

recognized, but as ways of advancing present knowledge. Much of his writing on physics is included in Gerhardt's

Mathematical Writings.

Physics

Leibniz contributed a fair amount to the statics and dynamics emerging about him, often disagreeing with Descartes

and Newton. He devised a new theory of motion (dynamics) based on kinetic energy and potential energy, which

posited space as relative, whereas Newton was thoroughly convinced that space was absolute. An important example

of Leibniz's mature physical thinking is his Specimen Dynamicum of 1695.

[57]

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

125

Until the discovery of subatomic particles and the quantum mechanics governing them, many of Leibniz's

speculative ideas about aspects of nature not reducible to statics and dynamics made little sense. For instance, he

anticipated Albert Einstein by arguing, against Newton, that space, time and motion are relative, not absolute.

Leibniz's rule is an important, if often overlooked, step in many proofs in diverse fields of physics. The principle of

sufficient reason has been invoked in recent cosmology, and his identity of indiscernibles in quantum mechanics, a

field some even credit him with having anticipated in some sense. Those who advocate digital philosophy, a recent

direction in cosmology, claim Leibniz as a precursor.

The vis viva

Leibniz's vis viva (Latin for living force) is mv

2

, twice the modern kinetic energy. He realized that the total energy

would be conserved in certain mechanical systems, so he considered it an innate motive characteristic of matter.

[58]

Here too his thinking gave rise to another regrettable nationalistic dispute. His vis viva was seen as rivaling the

conservation of momentum championed by Newton in England and by Descartes in France; hence academics in

those countries tended to neglect Leibniz's idea. In reality, both energy and momentum are conserved, so the two

approaches are equally valid.

Other natural science

By proposing that the earth has a molten core, he anticipated modern geology. In embryology, he was a

preformationist, but also proposed that organisms are the outcome of a combination of an infinite number of possible

microstructures and of their powers. In the life sciences and paleontology, he revealed an amazing transformist

intuition, fueled by his study of comparative anatomy and fossils. One of his principal works on this subject,

Protogaea, unpublished in his lifetime, has recently been published in English for the first time. He worked out a

primal organismic theory.

[59]

In medicine, he exhorted the physicians of his timewith some resultsto ground

their theories in detailed comparative observations and verified experiments, and to distinguish firmly scientific and

metaphysical points of view.

Social science

In psychology,

[60]

he anticipated the distinction between conscious and unconscious states. In public health, he

advocated establishing a medical administrative authority, with powers over epidemiology and veterinary medicine.

He worked to set up a coherent medical training programme, oriented towards public health and preventive

measures. In economic policy, he proposed tax reforms and a national insurance program, and discussed the balance

of trade. He even proposed something akin to what much later emerged as game theory. In sociology he laid the

ground for communication theory.

Technology

In 1906, Garland published a volume of Leibniz's writings bearing on his many practical inventions and engineering

work. To date, few of these writings have been translated into English. Nevertheless, it is well understood that

Leibniz was a serious inventor, engineer, and applied scientist, with great respect for practical life. Following the

motto theoria cum praxis, he urged that theory be combined with practical application, and thus has been claimed as

the father of applied science. He designed wind-driven propellers and water pumps, mining machines to extract ore,

hydraulic presses, lamps, submarines, clocks, etc. With Denis Papin, he invented a steam engine. He even proposed a

method for desalinating water. From 1680 to 1685, he struggled to overcome the chronic flooding that afflicted the

ducal silver mines in the Harz Mountains, but did not succeed.

[61]

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

126

Computation

Leibniz may have been the first computer scientist and information theorist.

[62]

Early in life, he documented the

binary numeral system (base 2), then revisited that system throughout his career.

[63]

He anticipated Lagrangian

interpolation and algorithmic information theory. His calculus ratiocinator anticipated aspects of the universal Turing

machine. In 1934, Norbert Wiener claimed to have found in Leibniz's writings a mention of the concept of feedback,

central to Wiener's later cybernetic theory.

In 1671, Leibniz began to invent a machine that could execute all four arithmetical operations, gradually improving

it over a number of years. This "Stepped Reckoner" attracted fair attention and was the basis of his election to the

Royal Society in 1673. A number of such machines were made during his years in Hanover, by a craftsman working

under Leibniz's supervision. It was not an unambiguous success because it did not fully mechanize the operation of

carrying. Couturat reported finding an unpublished note by Leibniz, dated 1674, describing a machine capable of

performing some algebraic operations.

[64]

Leibniz also devised a (now reproduced) cipher machine, recovered by

Nicholas Rescher in 2010.

[65]

Leibniz was groping towards hardware and software concepts worked out much later by Charles Babbage and Ada

Lovelace. In 1679, while mulling over his binary arithmetic, Leibniz imagined a machine in which binary numbers

were represented by marbles, governed by a rudimentary sort of punched cards.

[66]

Modern electronic digital

computers replace Leibniz's marbles moving by gravity with shift registers, voltage gradients, and pulses of

electrons, but otherwise they run roughly as Leibniz envisioned in 1679.

Librarian

While serving as librarian of the ducal libraries in Hanover and Wolfenbuettel, Leibniz effectively became one of the

founders of library science. The latter library was enormous for its day, as it contained more than 100,000 volumes,

and Leibniz helped design a new building for it, believed to be the first building explicitly designed to be a library.

He also designed a book indexing system in ignorance of the only other such system then extant, that of the Bodleian

Library at Oxford University. He also called on publishers to distribute abstracts of all new titles they produced each

year, in a standard form that would facilitate indexing. He hoped that this abstracting project would eventually

include everything printed from his day back to Gutenberg. Neither proposal met with success at the time, but

something like them became standard practice among English language publishers during the 20th century, under the

aegis of the Library of Congress and the British Library.

He called for the creation of an empirical database as a way to further all sciences. His characteristica universalis,

calculus ratiocinator, and a "community of minds"intended, among other things, to bring political and religious

unity to Europecan be seen as distant unwitting anticipations of artificial languages (e.g., Esperanto and its rivals),

symbolic logic, even the World Wide Web.

Advocate of scientific societies

Leibniz emphasized that research was a collaborative endeavor. Hence he warmly advocated the formation of

national scientific societies along the lines of the British Royal Society and the French Academie Royale des

Sciences. More specifically, in his correspondence and travels he urged the creation of such societies in Dresden,

Saint Petersburg, Vienna, and Berlin. Only one such project came to fruition; in 1700, the Berlin Academy of

Sciences was created. Leibniz drew up its first statutes, and served as its first President for the remainder of his life.

That Academy evolved into the German Academy of Sciences, the publisher of the ongoing critical edition of his

works.

[67]

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

127

Lawyer, moralist

With the possible exception of Marcus Aurelius, no philosopher has ever had as much experience with practical

affairs of state as Leibniz. Leibniz's writings on law, ethics, and politics

[68]

were long overlooked by

English-speaking scholars, but this has changed of late.

[69]

While Leibniz was no apologist for absolute monarchy like Hobbes, or for tyranny in any form, neither did he echo

the political and constitutional views of his contemporary John Locke, views invoked in support of democracy, in

18th-century America and later elsewhere. The following excerpt from a 1695 letter to Baron J. C. Boyneburg's son

Philipp is very revealing of Leibniz's political sentiments:

As for.. the great question of the power of sovereigns and the obedience their peoples owe them, I

usually say that it would be good for princes to be persuaded that their people have the right to resist

them, and for the people, on the other hand, to be persuaded to obey them passively. I am, however,

quite of the opinion of Grotius, that one ought to obey as a rule, the evil of revolution being greater

beyond comparison than the evils causing it. Yet I recognize that a prince can go to such excess, and

place the well-being of the state in such danger, that the obligation to endure ceases. This is most rare,

however, and the theologian who authorizes violence under this pretext should take care against excess;

excess being infinitely more dangerous than deficiency.

[70]

In 1677, Leibniz called for a European confederation, governed by a council or senate, whose members would

represent entire nations and would be free to vote their consciences;

[71]

this is sometimes tendentiously considered

an anticipation of the European Union. He believed that Europe would adopt a uniform religion. He reiterated these

proposals in 1715.

Ecumenism

Leibniz devoted considerable intellectual and diplomatic effort to what would now be called ecumenical endeavor,

seeking to reconcile first the Roman Catholic and Lutheran churches, later the Lutheran and Reformed churches. In

this respect, he followed the example of his early patrons, Baron von Boyneburg and the Duke John Frederickboth

cradle Lutherans who converted to Catholicism as adultswho did what they could to encourage the reunion of the

two faiths, and who warmly welcomed such endeavors by others. (The House of Brunswick remained Lutheran

because the Duke's children did not follow their father.) These efforts included corresponding with the French bishop

Jacques-Bnigne Bossuet, and involved Leibniz in a fair bit of theological controversy. He evidently thought that the

thoroughgoing application of reason would suffice to heal the breach caused by the Reformation.

Philologist

Leibniz the philologist was an avid student of languages, eagerly latching on to any information about vocabulary

and grammar that came his way. He refuted the belief, widely held by Christian scholars in his day, that Hebrew was

the primeval language of the human race. He also refuted the argument, advanced by Swedish scholars in his day,

that a form of proto-Swedish was the ancestor of the Germanic languages. He puzzled over the origins of the Slavic

languages, was aware of the existence of Sanskrit, and was fascinated by classical Chinese.

He published the princeps editio (first modern edition) of the late medieval Chronicon Holtzatiae, a Latin chronicle

of the County of Holstein.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

128

Sinophile

Leibniz was perhaps the first major European intellect to take a close interest in Chinese civilization, which he knew

by corresponding with, and reading other works by, European Christian missionaries posted in China. Having read

Confucius Sinicus Philosophus on the first year of its publication,

[72]

he concluded that Europeans could learn much

from the Confucian ethical tradition. He mulled over the possibility that the Chinese characters were an unwitting

form of his universal characteristic. He noted with fascination how the I Ching hexagrams correspond to the binary

numbers from 0 to 111111, and concluded that this mapping was evidence of major Chinese accomplishments in the

sort of philosophical mathematics he admired.

[73]

Leibniz's attraction to Chinese philosophy originates from his perception that Chinese philosophy was similar to his

own.

[72]

The historian E.R. Hughes suggests that Leibniz's ideas of "simple substance" and "pre-established

harmony" were directly influenced by Confucianism, pointing to the fact that they were conceived during the period

that he was reading Confucius Sinicus Philosophus.

[72]

As polymath

While making his grand tour of European archives to research the Brunswick family history that he never completed,

Leibniz stopped in Vienna between May 1688 and February 1689, where he did much legal and diplomatic work for

the Brunswicks. He visited mines, talked with mine engineers, and tried to negotiate export contracts for lead from

the ducal mines in the Harz mountains. His proposal that the streets of Vienna be lit with lamps burning rapeseed oil

was implemented. During a formal audience with the Austrian Emperor and in subsequent memoranda, he advocated

reorganizing the Austrian economy, reforming the coinage of much of central Europe, negotiating a Concordat

between the Habsburgs and the Vatican, and creating an imperial research library, official archive, and public

insurance fund. He wrote and published an important paper on mechanics.

Leibniz also wrote a short paper, first published by Louis Couturat in 1903,

[74]

summarizing his views on

metaphysics. The paper is undated; that he wrote it while in Vienna was determined only in 1999, when the ongoing

critical edition finally published Leibniz's philosophical writings for the period 167790. Couturat's reading of this

paper was the launching point for much 20th-century thinking about Leibniz, especially among analytic

philosophers. But after a meticulous study of all of Leibniz's philosophical writings up to 1688a study the 1999

additions to the critical edition made possibleMercer (2001) begged to differ with Couturat's reading; the jury is

still out.

Posthumous reputation

As a mathematician and philosopher

When Leibniz died, his reputation was in decline. He was remembered for only one book, the Thodice, whose

supposed central argument Voltaire lampooned in his Candide. Voltaire's depiction of Leibniz's ideas was so

influential that many believed it to be an accurate description. Thus Voltaire and his Candide bear some of the blame

for the lingering failure to appreciate and understand Leibniz's ideas. Leibniz had an ardent disciple, Christian Wolff,

whose dogmatic and facile outlook did Leibniz's reputation much harm. He also influenced David Hume who read

his Thodice and used some of his ideas.

[75]

In any event, philosophical fashion was moving away from the

rationalism and system building of the 17th century, of which Leibniz had been such an ardent proponent. His work

on law, diplomacy, and history was seen as of ephemeral interest. The vastness and richness of his correspondence

went unrecognized.

Much of Europe came to doubt that Leibniz had discovered the calculus independently of Newton, and hence his

whole work in mathematics and physics was neglected. Voltaire, an admirer of Newton, also wrote Candide at least

in part to discredit Leibniz's claim to having discovered the calculus and Leibniz's charge that Newton's theory of

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

129

universal gravitation was incorrect. The rise of relativity and subsequent work in the history of mathematics has put

Leibniz's stance in a more favorable light.

Leibniz's long march to his present glory began with the 1765 publication of the Nouveaux Essais, which Kant read

closely. In 1768, Dutens edited the first multi-volume edition of Leibniz's writings, followed in the 19th century by a

number of editions, including those edited by Erdmann, Foucher de Careil, Gerhardt, Gerland, Klopp, and Mollat.

Publication of Leibniz's correspondence with notables such as Antoine Arnauld, Samuel Clarke, Sophia of Hanover,

and her daughter Sophia Charlotte of Hanover, began.

In 1900, Bertrand Russell published a critical study of Leibniz's metaphysics.

[76]

Shortly thereafter, Louis Couturat

published an important study of Leibniz, and edited a volume of Leibniz's heretofore unpublished writings, mainly

on logic. They made Leibniz somewhat respectable among 20th-century analytical and linguistic philosophers in the

English-speaking world (Leibniz had already been of great influence to many Germans such as Bernhard Riemann).

For example, Leibniz's phrase salva veritate, meaning interchangeability without loss of or compromising the truth,

recurs in Willard Quine's writings. Nevertheless, the secondary English-language literature on Leibniz did not really

blossom until after World War II. This is especially true of English speaking countries; in Gregory Brown's

bibliography fewer than 30 of the English language entries were published before 1946. American Leibniz studies

owe much to Leroy Loemker (190485) through his translations and his interpretive essays in LeClerc (1973).

Nicholas Jolley has surmised that Leibniz's reputation as a philosopher is now perhaps higher than at any time since

he was alive.

[77]

Analytic and contemporary philosophy continue to invoke his notions of identity, individuation, and

possible worlds, while the doctrinaire contempt for metaphysics, characteristic of analytic and linguistic philosophy,

has faded. Work in the history of 17th- and 18th-century ideas has revealed more clearly the 17th-century

"Intellectual Revolution" that preceded the better-known Industrial and commercial revolutions of the 18th and 19th

centuries. The 17th- and 18th-century belief that natural science, especially physics, differs from philosophy mainly

in degree and not in kind, is no longer dismissed out of hand. That modern science includes a "scholastic" as well as

a "radical empiricist" element is more accepted now than in the early 20th century. Leibniz's thought is now seen as a

major prolongation of the mighty endeavor begun by Plato and Aristotle: the universe and man's place in it are

amenable to human reason.

In 1985, the German government created the Leibniz Prize, offering an annual award of 1.55 million euros for

experimental results and 770,000 euros for theoretical ones. It is the world's largest prize for scientific achievement.

The collection of manuscript papers of Leibniz at the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek Niederschische

Landesbibliothek were inscribed on UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 2007.

[78]

Leibniz biscuits

Leibniz-Keks, a popular brand of biscuits, are named after Gottfried Leibniz. These biscuits honour Leibniz because

he was a resident of Hanover, where the company is based.

[79]

Writings and edition

Leibniz mainly wrote in three languages: scholastic Latin, French and German. During his lifetime, he published

many pamphlets and scholarly articles, but only two "philosophical" books, the Combinatorial Art and the

Thodice. (He published numerous pamphlets, often anonymous, on behalf of the House of Brunswick-Lneburg,

most notably the "De jure suprematum" a major consideration of the nature of sovereignty.) One substantial book

appeared posthumously, his Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain, which Leibniz had withheld from

publication after the death of John Locke. Only in 1895, when Bodemann completed his catalogues of Leibniz's

manuscripts and correspondence, did the enormous extent of Leibniz's Nachlass become clear: about 15,000 letters

to more than 1000 recipients plus more than 40,000 other items. Moreover, quite a few of these letters are of essay

length. Much of his vast correspondence, especially the letters dated after 1685, remains unpublished, and much of

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

130

what is published has been so only in recent decades. The amount, variety, and disorder of Leibniz's writings are a

predictable result of a situation he described in a letter as follows:

I cannot tell you how extraordinarily distracted and spread out I am. I am trying to find various things in

the archives; I look at old papers and hunt up unpublished documents. From these I hope to shed some

light on the history of the [House of] Brunswick. I receive and answer a huge number of letters. At the

same time, I have so many mathematical results, philosophical thoughts, and other literary innovations

that should not be allowed to vanish that I often do not know where to begin.

[80]

The extant parts of the critical edition

[81]

of Leibniz's writings are organized as follows:

Series 1. Political, Historical, and General Correspondence. 21 vols., 16661701.

Series 2. Philosophical Correspondence. 1 vol., 166385.

Series 3. Mathematical, Scientific, and Technical Correspondence. 6 vols., 167296.

Series 4. Political Writings. 6 vols., 166798.

Series 5. Historical and Linguistic Writings. Inactive.

Series 6. Philosophical Writings. 7 vols., 166390, and Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain.

Series 7. Mathematical Writings. 3 vols., 167276.

Series 8. Scientific, Medical, and Technical Writings. In preparation.

The systematic cataloguing of all of Leibniz's Nachlass began in 1901. It was hampered by two world wars, the Nazi

dictatorship (with the Holocaust, which affected a Jewish employee of the project, and other personal consequences),

and decades of German division (two states with the cold war's "iron curtain" in between, separating scholars and

also scattering portions of his literary estates). The ambitious project has had to deal with seven languages contained

in some 200,000 pages of written and printed paper. In 1985 it was reorganized and included in a joint program of

German federal and state (Lnder) academies. Since then the branches in Potsdam, Mnster, Hanover and Berlin

have jointly published 25 volumes of the critical edition, with an average of 870 pages, and prepared index and

concordance works.

Selected works

The year given is usually that in which the work was completed, not of its eventual publication.

1666. De Arte Combinatoria (On the Art of Combination); partially translated in Loemker 1 and Parkinson

(1966).

1671. Hypothesis Physica Nova (New Physical Hypothesis); Loemker 8.I (partial).

1673 Confessio philosophi (A Philosopher's Creed); an English translation is available.

1684. Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis (New method for maximums and minimums); translated in Struik,

D. J., 1969. A Source Book in Mathematics, 12001800. Harvard University Press: 27181.

1686. Discours de mtaphysique; Martin and Brown (1988), Ariew and Garber 35, Loemker 35, Wiener III.3,

Woolhouse and Francks 1. An online translation

[82]

by Jonathan Bennett is available.

1703. Explication de l'Arithmtique Binaire (Explanation of Binary Arithmetic); Gerhardt, Mathematical Writings

VII.223. An online translation

[83]

by Lloyd Strickland is available.

1710. Thodice; Farrer, A.M., and Huggard, E.M., trans., 1985 (1952). Wiener III.11 (part). An online

translation

[84]

is available at Project Gutenberg.

1714. Monadologie; translated by Nicholas Rescher, 1991. The Monadology: An Edition for Students. University

of Pittsburg Press. Ariew and Garber 213, Loemker 67, Wiener III.13, Woolhouse and Francks 19. Online

translations: Jonathan Bennett's translation

[82]

; Latta's translation

[85]

; French, Latin and Spanish edition, with

facsimile of Leibniz's manuscript.

[86]

1765. Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain; completed in 1704. Remnant, Peter, and Bennett, Jonathan,

trans., 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge University Press. Wiener III.6 (part). An online

translation

[87]

by Jonathan Bennett is available.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

131

Collections

Five important collections of English translations are Wiener (1951), Loemker (1969), Ariew and Garber (1989),

Woolhouse and Francks (1998), and Strickland (2006). The ongoing critical edition of all of Leibniz's writings is

Smtliche Schriften und Briefe.

[81]

Notes

[1] The History of Philosophy, Vol. IV: Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Leibniz by Frederick C. Copleston (1958)

[2] Franz Exner, "ber Leibnitz'ens Universal-Wissenschaft", 1843; "Universalwissenschaft" (http:/ / www. zeno. org/ Meyers-1905/ A/

Universalwissenschaft) in the Meyers Groes Konversations-Lexikon; Stanley Burris, "Leibniz's Influence on 19th Century Logic" (http:/ /

plato. stanford.edu/ entries/ leibniz-logic-influence/ ), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

[3] Max Mangold (ed.), ed. (2005) (in German). Duden-Aussprachewrterbuch (Duden Pronunciation Dictionary) (7th ed.). Mannheim:

Bibliographisches Institut GmbH. ISBN978-3-411-04066-7.

[4] Eva-Maria Krech et al. (ed.), ed. (2010) (in German). Deutsches Aussprachewrterbuch (German Pronunciation Dictionary) (1st ed.). Berlin:

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG. ISBN978-3-11-018203-3.

[5] [5] David Smith, p.173-181 (1929)

[6] Roughly 40%, 30%, and 15%, respectively. www.gwlb.de (http:/ / www. gwlb. de/ Leibniz/ Leibniz-Nachlass/ index. htm). Leibniz-Nachlass

(i.e. Legacy of Leibniz), Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek (one of the three Official Libraries of the German state Lower Saxony).

[7] Baird, Forrest E.; Walter Kaufmann (2008). From Plato to Derrida. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

ISBN0-13-158591-6.

[8] Leibnitiana (http:/ / www. gwleibniz.com/ friedrich_leibniz/ friedrich_leibniz. html)

[9] Johann Amos Comenius, Comenius in England, Oxford University Press, 1932, p. 6

[10] [10] Mackie (1845), 21

[11] [11] Mackie (1845), 22

[12] [12] Mackie (1845), 26

[13] Jolley, Nicholas (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.:20

[14] [14] Mackie (1845), 38

[15] [15] Mackie (1845), 39

[16] [16] Mackie (1845), 40

[17] [17] Aiton 1985: 312

[18] [18] Mackie (1845), 41-42

[19] [19] Mackie (1845), 43

[20] [20] Mackie (1845), 44-45

[21] [21] Mackie (1845), 58-61

[22] [22] Mackie (1845), 69-70

[23] [23] Mackie (1845), 73-74

[24] On the encounter between Newton and Leibniz and a review of the evidence, see Alfred Rupert Hall, Philosophers at War: The Quarrel

Between Newton and Leibniz (Cambridge, 2002), pp. 4469.

[25] [25] Mackie (1845), 117-118

[26] For a recent study of Leibniz's correspondence with Sophia Charlotte, see MacDonald Ross (http:/ / www. philosophy. leeds. ac. uk/ GMR/

homepage/ sophiec.html) (1998).

[27] [27] Mackie (1845), 109

[28] See Wiener IV.6 and Loemker 40. Also see a curious passage titled "Leibniz's Philosophical Dream," first published by Bodemann in 1895

and translated on p. 253 of Morris, Mary, ed. and trans., 1934. Philosophical Writings. Dent & Sons Ltd.

[29] Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (2012). Peter Loptson. ed. Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Writings. Broadview Press. pp.2324.

ISBN9781554810116. "The answer is unknowable, but it may not be unreasonable to see him, at least in theological terms, as essentially a

deist. He is a determinist: there are no miracles (the events so called being merely instances of infrequently occurring natural laws); Christ has

no real role in the system; we live forever, and hence we carry on after our deaths, but then everything every individual substance

carries on forever. Nonetheless, Leibniz is a theist. His system is generated from, and needs, the postulate of a creative god. In fact, though,

despite Leibniz's protestations, his God is more the architect and engineer of the vast complex world-system than the embodiment of love of

Christian orthodoxy."

[30] Christopher Ernest Cosans (2009). Owen's Ape & Darwin's Bulldog: Beyond Darwinism and Creationism. Indiana University Press.

pp.102103. ISBN9780253220516. "In advancing his system of mechanics, Newton claimed that collisions of celestial objects would cause a

loss of energy that would require God to intervene from time to time to maintain order in the solar system (Vailati 1997, 3742). In criticizing

this implication, Leibniz remarks: "Sir Isaac Newton and his followers have also a very odd opinion concerning the work of God. According

to their doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time; otherwise it would cease to move." (Leibniz 1715, 675) Leibniz

argues that any scientific theory that relies on God to perform miracles after He had first made the universe indicates that God lacked

sufficient foresight or power to establish adequate natural laws in the first place. In defense of Newton's theism, Clarke is unapologetic: "'tis

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

132

not a diminution but the true glory of his workmanship that nothing is done without his continual government and inspection"' (Leibniz 1715,

676677). Clarke is believed to have consulted closely with Newton on how to respond to Leibniz. He asserts that Leibniz's deism leads to

"the notion of materialism and fate" (1715, 677), because it excludes God from the daily workings of nature."

[31] Andreas Sofroniou (2007). Moral Philosophy, from Hippocrates to the 21st Aeon. Lulu.com. ISBN9781847534637. "In a commentary on

Shaftesbury published in 1720, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a Rationalist philosopher and mathematician, accepted the Deist conception of

God as an intelligent Creator but refused the contention that a god who metes out punishments is evil."

[32] Shelby D. Hunt (2003). Controversy in Marketing Theory: For Reason, Realism, Truth, and Objectivity. M.E. Sharpe. p.33.

ISBN9780765609311. "Consistent with the liberal views of the Enlightenment, Leibniz was an optimist with respect to human reasoning and

scientific progress (Popper 1963, p.69). Although he was a great reader and admirer of Spinoza, Leibniz, being a confirmed deist, rejected

emphatically Spinoza's pantheism: God and nature, for Leibniz, were not simply two different "labels" for the same "thing"."

[33] Ariew & Garber, 69; Loemker, 36, 38

[34] Ariew & Garber, 138; Loemker, 47; Wiener, II.4

[35] Ariew & Garber, 27284; Loemker, 14, 20, 21; Wiener, III.8

[36] [36] Mates (1986), chpts. 7.3, 9

[37] [37] Loemker 717

[38] See Jolley (1995: 12931), Woolhouse and Francks (1998), and Mercer (2001).

[39] [39] Loemker 311

[40] For a precis of what Leibniz meant by these and other Principles, see Mercer (2001: 47384). For a classic discussion of Sufficient Reason

and Plenitude, see Lovejoy (1957).

[41] Rutherford (1998) is a detailed scholarly study of Leibniz's theodicy.

[42] Magill, Frank (ed.). Masterpieces of World Philosophy. New York: Harper Collins (1990).

[43] [43] Magill, Frank (ed.) (1990)

[44] The Art of Discovery 1685, Wiener 51

[45] [45] Many of his memoranda are translated in Parkinson 1966.

[46] [46] Loemker, however, who translated some of Leibniz's works into English, said that the symbols of chemistry were real characters, so there is

disagreement among Leibniz scholars on this point.

[47] Preface to the General Science, 1677. Revision of Rutherford's translation in Jolley 1995: 234. Also Wiener I.4

[48] A good introductory discussion of the "characteristic" is Jolley (1995: 22640). An early, yet still classic, discussion of the "characteristic"

and "calculus" is Couturat (1901: chpts. 3,4).

[49] [49] Struik (1969), 367

[50] Jesseph, Douglas M. (1998). "Leibniz on the Foundations of the Calculus: The Question of the Reality of Infinitesimal Magnitudes" (http:/ /

muse.jhu. edu/ journals/ perspectives_on_science/ v006/ 6. 1jesseph. html). Perspectives on Science 6.1&2: 640. . Retrieved 31 December

2011.

[51] For an English translation of this paper, see Struik (1969: 27184), who also translates parts of two other key papers by Leibniz on the

calculus.

[52] Katz, Mikhail; Sherry, David (2012), "Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from

Berkeley to Russell and Beyond", Erkenntnis, arXiv:1205.0174, doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9370-y

[53] [53] Loemker 27

[54] [54] Mates (1986), 240

[55] HIRANO, Hideaki. "Leibniz's Cultural Pluralism And Natural Law" (http:/ / www. t. hosei. ac. jp/ ~hhirano/ academia/ leibniz. htm). .

Retrieved March 10, 2010.

[56] [56] Mandelbrot (1977), 419. Quoted in Hirano (1997).

[57] [57] Ariew and Garber 117, Loemker 46, W II.5. On Leibniz and physics, see the chapter by Garber in Jolley (1995) and Wilson (1989).

[58] See Ariew and Garber 15586, Loemker 5355, W II.67a

[59] [59] On Leibniz and biology, see Loemker (1969a: VIII).

[60] [60] On Leibniz and psychology, see Loemker (1969a: IX).

[61] Aiton (1985), 107114, 136

[62] [62] Davis (2000) discusses Leibniz's prophetic role in the emergence of calculating machines and of formal languages.

[63] See Couturat (1901): 47378.

[64] [64] Couturat (1901), 115

[65] See N. Rescher, Leibniz and Cryptography (Pittsburgh, University Library Systems, University of Pittsburgh, 2012).

[66] The Reality Club: Wake Up Call for Europe Tech (http:/ / www. edge. org/ discourse/ schirrmacher_eurotech. html)

[67] [67] On Leibniz's projects for scientific societies, see Couturat (1901), App. IV.

[68] See, for example, Ariew and Garber 19, 94, 111, 193; Riley 1988; Loemker 2, 7, 20, 29, 44, 59, 62, 65; W I.1, IV.13

[69] [69] See (in order of difficulty) Jolley (2005: chpt. 7), Gregory Brown's chapter in Jolley (1995), Hostler (1975), and Riley (1996).

[70] [70] Loemker: 59, fn 16. Translation revised.

[71] [71] Loemker: 58, fn 9

[72] Mungello, David E. (1971). "Leibniz's Interpretation of Neo-Confucianism". Philosophy East and West 21 (1): 322. doi:10.2307/1397760.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

133

[73] On Leibniz, the I Ching, and binary numbers, see Aiton (1985: 24548). Leibniz's writings on Chinese civilization are collected and

translated in Cook and Rosemont (1994), and discussed in Perkins (2004).

[74] [74] Later translated as Loemker 267 and Woolhouse and Francks 30

[75] Vasilyev, 1993 (http:/ / www. humesociety.org/ hs/ issues/ v19n1/ vasilyeu/ vasilyeu-v19n1. pdf)

[76] [76] Russell, 1900

[77] Jolley, 21719

[78] "Letters from and to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz within the collection of manuscript papers of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz" (http:/ / portal.

unesco. org/ ci/ en/ ev. php-URL_ID=22464& URL_DO=DO_TOPIC& URL_SECTION=201. html). UNESCO Memory of the World

Programme. 2008-05-16. . Retrieved 2009-12-15.

[79] "Bahlsen products FAQ" (http:/ / www.bahlsen. de/ root_bahlsen_anim/ index. php). .

[80] 1695 letter to Vincent Placcius in Gerhardt.

[81] www.leibniz-edition.de (http:/ / www. leibniz-edition. de/ ). See photograph there.

[82] http:/ / www.earlymoderntexts.com

[83] http:/ / www.leibniz-translations.com/ binary.htm

[84] http:/ / www.gutenberg. org/ etext/ 17147

[85] http:/ / www.rbjones.com/ rbjpub/ philos/ classics/ leibniz/ monad. htm

[86] http:/ / www.helicon. es/ dig/ 8542205. pdf

[87] http:/ / www.earlymoderntexts.com/ f_leibniz. html

References

Primary literature

Alexander, H G (ed) The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956.

Ariew, R & D Garber, 1989. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Hackett.

Arthur, Richard, 2001. The Labyrinth of the Continuum: Writings on the Continuum Problem, 16721686. Yale

University Press.

Cohen, Claudine and Wakefield, Andre, 2008. Protogaea. University of Chicago Press.

Cook, Daniel, and Rosemont, Henry Jr., 1994. Leibniz: Writings on China. Open Court.

Loemker, Leroy, 1969 (1956). Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters. Reidel.

Remnant, Peter, and Bennett, Jonathan, 1996 (1981). Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge

University Press.

Riley, Patrick, 1988. Leibniz: Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.

Sleigh, Robert C., Look, Brandon, and Stam, James, 2005. Confessio Philosophi: Papers Concerning the Problem

of Evil, 16711678. Yale University Press.

Strickland, Lloyd, 2006. The Shorter Leibniz Texts: A Collection of New Translations. Continuum.

Ward, A. W. Leibniz as a Politician (lecture, 1911)

Wiener, Philip, 1951. Leibniz: Selections. Scribner.

Woolhouse, R.S., and Francks, R., 1998. Leibniz: Philosophical Texts. Oxford University Press.

Secondary literature

Adams, Robert Merrihew. Lebniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York: Oxford, Oxford University Press,

1994.

Aiton, Eric J., 1985. Leibniz: A Biography. Hilger (UK).

Antognazza, M.R.(2008) Leibniz: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge Univ. Press.

[ Editthisreference

(http:/ / en. wikipedia. org/ w/ index. php?title=Template:BarrowTipler1986& action=edit)

]

Barrow, John D.; Tipler, Frank J. (19 May 1988). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (http:/ / books. google.

com/ books?id=uSykSbXklWEC& printsec=frontcover). foreword by John A. Wheeler. Oxford: Oxford University

Press. ISBN9780192821478. LC 87-28148 (http:/ / lccn. loc. gov/ 87028148). Retrieved 31 December 2009.

Albeck-Gidron, Rachel, The Century of the Monads: Leibniz's Metaphysics and 20th-Century Modernity, Bar-Ilan

University Press.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

134

Bos, H. J. M. (1974) "Differentials, higher-order differentials and the derivative in the Leibnizian calculus," Arch.

History Exact Sci. 14: 190.

Couturat, Louis, 1901. La Logique de Leibniz. Paris: Felix Alcan.

Davis, Martin, 2000. The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing. WW Norton.

Deleuze, Gilles, 1993. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. University of Minnesota Press.

Du Bois-Reymond, Paul, 18nn. "Leibnizian Thoughts in Modern Science".

Finster, Reinhard & Gerd van den Heuvel. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Mit Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten.

4. Auflage. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg 2000 (Rowohlts Monographien, 50481), ISBN 3-499-50481-2.

Grattan-Guinness, Ivor, 1997. The Norton History of the Mathematical Sciences. W W Norton.

Hall, A. R., 1980. Philosophers at War: The Quarrel between Newton and Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, Martin, 1983. The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Indiana University Press.

Hirano, Hideaki, 1997. "Cultural Pluralism And Natural Law." Unpublished.

Hostler, J., 1975. Leibniz's Moral Philosophy. UK: Duckworth.

Jolley, Nicholas, ed., 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.

LeClerc, Ivor, ed., 1973. The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Vanderbilt University Press.

Lovejoy, Arthur O., 1957 (1936) "Plenitude and Sufficient Reason in Leibniz and Spinoza" in his The Great

Chain of Being. Harvard University Press: 14482. Reprinted in Frankfurt, H. G., ed., 1972. Leibniz: A

Collection of Critical Essays. Anchor Books.

Mandelbrot, Benot, 1977. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman.

Mackie, John Milton; Guhrauer, Gottschalk Eduard, 1845. Life of Godfrey William von Leibnitz. Gould, Kendall

and Lincoln.

Mates, Benson, 1986. The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language. Oxford University Press.

Mercer, Christia, 2001. Leibniz's metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge University Press.

Morris, Simon Conway, 2003. Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge University

Press.

Perkins, Franklin, 2004. Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light. Cambridge University Press.

Rensoli, Lourdes, 2002. El problema antropologico en la concepcion filosofica de G. W. Leibniz. Leibnitius

Politechnicus. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.

Riley, Patrick, 1996. Leibniz's Universal Jurisprudence: Justice as the Charity of the Wise. Harvard University

Press.

Rutherford, Donald, 1998. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge University Press.

Struik, D. J., 1969. A Source Book in Mathematics, 12001800. Harvard University Press.

Ward, P. D., and Brownlee, D., 2000. Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe. Springer

Verlag.

Wilson, Catherine, 1989. 'Leibniz's Metaphysics. Princeton University Press.

Zalta, E. N., 2000. " A (Leibnizian) Theory of Concepts (http:/ / mally. stanford. edu/ Papers/ leibniz. pdf)",

Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse / Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 3: 137183.

Smith, David Eugene (1929). A Source Book in Mathematics. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book

Company, Inc..

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

135

External links

An extensive bibliography (http:/ / www. worldcat. org/ profiles/ mciocchi/ lists/ 1786513)

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: " Leibniz (http:/ / www. utm. edu/ research/ iep/ l/ leib-met. htm)"

Douglas Burnham.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Articles on Leibniz (http:/ / plato. stanford. edu/ search/ searcher.

py?query=Leibniz).

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews.

ac. uk/ Biographies/ Leibniz. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

George MacDonald Ross, Leibniz (http:/ / etext. leeds. ac. uk/ leibniz/ leibniz. htm), Originally published: Oxford

University Press (Past Masters) 1984; Electronic edition: Leeds Electronic Text Centre July 2000

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (http:/ / genealogy. math. ndsu. nodak. edu/ id. php?id=60985) at the Mathematics

Genealogy Project

Works by Gottfried Leibniz (http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ author/ Leibniz+ Gottfried+ Wilhelm+ Freiherr+ von)

at Project Gutenberg

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (http:/ / www. dmoz. org/ Society/ Philosophy/ Philosophers/ L/

Leibniz,_Gottfried_Wilhelm/ ) at the Open Directory Project

translations (http:/ / www. earlymoderntexts. com) by Jonathan Bennett, of the New Essays, the exchanges with

Bayle, Arnauld and Clarke, and about 15 shorter works.

Leibnitiana (http:/ / www. gwleibniz. com/ ) Gregory Brown.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Texts and Translations (http:/ / philosophyfaculty. ucsd. edu/ faculty/ rutherford/

Leibniz/ index. html), compiled by Donald Rutherford, UCSD

Leibniz-translations.com (http:/ / www. leibniz-translations. com/ ) Scroll down for many Leibniz links.

Leibniz Prize. (http:/ / www. dfg. de/ en/ news/ scientific_prizes/ leibniz_preis/ index. html)

Philosophical Works of Leibniz translated by G.M. Duncan (http:/ / www. archive. org/ details/

philosophicalwor00leibuoft)

Leibnitiana (http:/ / www. gwleibniz. com/ ), links and resources compiled by Gregory Brown, University of

Houston.

Leibnizian Resources (http:/ / www. helsinki. fi/ ~mroinila/ leibniz1. htm), many links organized by Markku

Roinila, University of Helsinki.

Leibniz Bibliography (http:/ / www. leibniz-bibliographie. de/ DB=1. 95/ LNG=EN/

?COOKIE=U8000,K8000,I0,B1999+ + + + + + ,SY,NVZG,D1. 95,E0ed05df2-2e89,A,H,R194. 95. 154. 1,FY) at

the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Library.

Bernoulli family

136

Bernoulli family

The Bernoullis (German: [bnli]

[1]

; (English: pron.: /brnuli/)) were a patrician family of merchants and scholars,

originally from Antwerp, who settled in Basel, Switzerland. The name is sometimes misspelled Bernou-ill-i and

mispronounced accordingly.

[2]

Leon Bernoulli was a doctor in Antwerp, which at that time was in the Spanish Netherlands. He died in 1561 and in

1570 his son, Jacob, emigrated to Frankfurt am Main to escape from the Spanish persecution of the Huguenots.

[3]

Jacobs grandson, a spice trader also named Jacob, moved in 1620 to Basel, Switzerland, and was granted Swiss

citizenship. His son Niklaus (1623-1708), Leons great-great-grandson, married Margarethe Schnauer.

Niklaus had three sons:

Jacob Bernoulli (16541705; also known as James or Jacques) Mathematician after whom Bernoulli numbers are

named.

Nicolaus Bernoulli (16621716) Painter and alderman of Basel.

Johann Bernoulli (16671748; also known as Jean) Mathematician and early adopter of infinitesimal calculus.

In addition to those mentioned above, the Bernoulli family produced many notable artists and scientists, in particular

a number of famous mathematicians in the 18th century:

Nicolaus I Bernoulli (16871759) Mathematician.

Nicolaus II Bernoulli (16951726) Mathematician; worked on curves, differential equations, and probability.

Daniel Bernoulli (17001782) Developer of Bernoulli's principle and St. Petersburg paradox.

Johann II Bernoulli (17101790; also known as Jean) Mathematician and physicist.

Johann III Bernoulli (17441807; also known as Jean) Astronomer, geographer, and mathematician.

Jacob II Bernoulli (17591789; also known as Jacques) Physicist and mathematician.

Devices and ideas named for members of the family

Bernoulli differential equation

Bernoulli distribution

Bernoulli number

Bernoulli polynomials

Bernoulli process

Bernoulli trial

Bernoulli's principle

References

[1] Mangold, Max (1990) Duden - Das Aussprachewrterbuch. 3. Auflage. Mannheim/Wien/Zrich, Dudenverlag.

[2] [2] Talk page, section Pronunciation

[3] Historic Lexicon of the Swiss, Bernoulli (http:/ / www. hls-dhs-dss. ch/ textes/ f/ F20951. php)

Family tree (http:/ / www-groups. dcs. st-and. ac. uk/ ~history/ Diagrams/ Bernoulli_family. gif) at the MacTutor

History of Mathematics archive.

Bernoulli family in German (http:/ / www. hls-dhs-dss. ch/ textes/ d/ D20951. php), French (http:/ / www.

hls-dhs-dss. ch/ textes/ f/ F20951. php) and Italian (http:/ / www. hls-dhs-dss. ch/ textes/ i/ I20951. php) in the

online Historical Dictionary of Switzerland.

Jacob Bernoulli

137

Jacob Bernoulli

For other family members named Jacob, see Bernoulli family.

Jacob Bernoulli

Jakob Bernoulli

Born 6 January 1655

Basel, Switzerland

Died 16 August 1705 (aged50)

Basel, Switzerland

Residence Switzerland

Nationality Swiss

Fields Mathematician

Institutions University of Basel

Alma mater University of Basel

Doctoral students Johann Bernoulli

Jacob Hermann

Nicolaus I Bernoulli

Knownfor Bernoulli differential

equation

Bernoulli numbers

(Bernoulli's formula

Bernoulli polynomials

Bernoulli map)

Bernoulli trial

(Bernoulli process

Bernoulli scheme

Bernoulli operator

Hidden Bernoulli model

Bernoulli sampling

Bernoulli distribution

Bernoulli random variable

Bernoulli's Golden Theorem)

Bernoulli's inequality

Lemniscate of Bernoulli

Notes

Brother of Johann Bernoulli.

Jacob Bernoulli (also known as James or Jacques) (27 December 1654/6 January 1655 16 August 1705) was one

of the many prominent mathematicians in the Bernoulli family.

Jacob Bernoulli

138

Jacob Bernoulli was born in Basel, Switzerland. Following his father's wish, he studied theology and entered the

ministry. But contrary to the desires of his parents, he also studied mathematics and astronomy. He traveled

throughout Europe from 1676 to 1682, learning about the latest discoveries in mathematics and the sciences. This

included the work of Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke.

Jacob Bernoulli's grave.

He became familiar with calculus through a correspondence with

Gottfried Leibniz, then collaborated with his brother Johann on various

applications, notably publishing papers on transcendental curves

(1696) and isoperimetry (1700, 1701). In 1690, Jacob Bernoulli

became the first person to develop the technique for solving separable

differential equations.

Upon returning to Basel in 1682, he founded a school for mathematics

and the sciences. He was appointed professor of mathematics at the

University of Basel in 1687, remaining in this position for the rest of

his life.

Important works

Jacob Bernoulli is best known for the work Ars Conjectandi (The Art

of Conjecture), published eight years after his death in 1713 by his

nephew Nicholas. In this work, he described the known results in

probability theory and in enumeration, often providing alternative

proofs of known results. This work also includes the application of probability theory to games of chance and his

introduction of the theorem known as the law of large numbers. The terms Bernoulli trial and Bernoulli numbers

result from this work. The lunar crater Bernoulli is also named after him jointly with his brother Johann.

Discovery of the mathematical constant e

Bernoulli discovered the constant e by studying a question about compound interest which required him to find the

value of the following expression (which is in fact e):

One example is an account that starts with $1.00 and pays 100 percent interest per year. If the interest is credited

once, at the end of the year, the value is $2.00; but if the interest is computed and added twice in the year, the $1 is

multiplied by 1.5 twice, yielding $1.001.5=$2.25. Compounding quarterly yields $1.001.25

4

=$2.4414..., and

compounding monthly yields $1.00(1.0833...)

12

=$2.613035....

Bernoulli noticed that this sequence approaches a limit (the force of interest) for more and smaller compounding

intervals. Compounding weekly yields $2.692597..., while compounding daily yields $2.714567..., just two cents

more. Using n as the number of compounding intervals, with interest of 100%/n in each interval, the limit for large n

is the number that came to be known as e; with continuous compounding, the account value will reach $2.7182818....

More generally, an account that starts at $1, and yields (1+R) dollars at simple interest, will yield e

R

dollars with

continuous compounding.

Jacob Bernoulli

139

Personal life

Bernoulli chose a figure of a logarithmic spiral and the motto Eadem mutata resurgo ("Changed and yet the same, I

rise again") for his gravestone; the spiral executed by the stonemasons was, however, an Archimedean spiral.,

[1]

[Jacques Bernoulli] wrote that the logarithmic spiral may be used as a symbol, either of fortitude and constancy in

adversity, or of the human body, which after all its changes, even after death, will be restored to its exact and perfect

self. (Livio 2002: 116).

Jacob had a daughter and a son.

References

[1] Jacob (Jacques) Bernoulli (http:/ / www-gap.dcs.st-and. ac. uk/ ~history/ Biographies/ Bernoulli_Jacob. html), The MacTutor History of

Mathematics archive (http:/ / www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/ ~history/ ), School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, UK.

Further reading

Hoffman, J.E. (197080). "Bernoulli, Jakob (Jacques) I". Dictionary of Scientific Biography. 2. New York:

Charles Scribner's Sons. pp.4651. ISBN0684101149.

Schneider, I., 2005, "Ars conjectandi" in Grattan-Guinness, I., ed., Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics.

Elsevier: 88104.

Livio, Mario, 2002, The golden ratio: the story of Phi, the extraordinary number of nature, art, and beauty.

London.

External links

Jacob Bernoulli (http:/ / genealogy. math. ndsu. nodak. edu/ id. php?id=54440) at the Mathematics Genealogy

Project

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Jacob Bernoulli" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Bernoulli_Jacob. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

Jakob Bernoulli: Tractatus de Seriebus Infinitis (http:/ / www. kubkou. se/ pdf/ mh/ jacobB. pdf) (pdf)

Weisstein, Eric W., Bernoulli, Jakob (16541705) (http:/ / scienceworld. wolfram. com/ biography/

BernoulliJakob. html) from ScienceWorld.

Johann Bernoulli

140

Johann Bernoulli

Johann Bernoulli

Johann Bernoulli (portrait by Johann Rudolf Huber, circa 1740)

Born 27 July 1667

Basel, Switzerland

Died 1 January 1748 (aged80)

Basel, Switzerland

Residence Switzerland

Nationality Swiss

Fields Mathematician

Institutions University of Groningen

University of Basel

Alma mater University of Basel

Doctoral advisor Jacob Bernoulli

Other academicadvisors Nikolaus Eglinger

Doctoral students Daniel Bernoulli

Leonhard Euler

Johann Samuel Knig

Pierre Louis Maupertuis

Other notablestudents Guillaume de l'Hpital

Knownfor Development of infinitesimal

calculus

Catenary solution

Bernoulli's rule

Bernoulli's identity

Notes

Brother of Jakob Bernoulli, and the father of Daniel Bernoulli.

Johann Bernoulli (27 July 1667 1 January 1748; also known as Jean or John) was a Swiss mathematician and

was one of the many prominent mathematicians in the Bernoulli family. He is known for his contributions to

infinitesimal calculus and educated Leonhard Euler in his youth.

Johann Bernoulli

141

Early life and education

Johann was born in Basel, the son of Nikolaus Bernoulli, an apothecary, and his wife, Margaretha Schonauer and

began studying medicine at Basel University. His father desired that he study business so that he might take over the

family spice trade, but Johann Bernoulli disliked business and convinced his father to allow him to study medicine

instead. However, Johann Bernoulli did not enjoy medicine either and began studying mathematics on the side with

his older brother Jacob.

[1]

Throughout Johann Bernoullis education at Basel University the Bernoulli brothers

worked together spending much of their time studying the newly discovered infinitesimal calculus. They were

among the first mathematicians to not only study and understand calculus but to apply it to various problems.

[2]

Adult life

After graduating from Basel University Johann Bernoulli moved to teach differential equations. Later, in 1694,

Johann Bernoulli married Dorothea Falkner and soon after accepted a position as the professor of mathematics at the

University of Groningen. At the request of Johann Bernoullis father-in-law, Johann Bernoulli began the voyage back

to his home town of Basel in 1705. Just after setting out on the journey he learned of his brothers death to

tuberculosis. Johann Bernoulli had planned on becoming the professor of Greek at Basel University upon returning

but instead was able to take over as professor of mathematics, his older brothers former position. As a student of

Leibnizs calculus, Johann Bernoulli sided with him in 1713 in the NewtonLeibniz debate over who deserved credit

for the discovery of calculus. Johann Bernoulli defended Leibniz by showing that he had solved certain problems

with his methods that Newton had failed to solve. However, due to his opposition to Newton and the study that

vortex theory over Newtons theory of gravitation which ultimately delayed acceptance of Newtons theory in

continental Europe.

[3]

In 1724 he entered a competition sponsored by the French Acadmie Royale des Sciences, which posed the question:

What are the laws according to which a perfectly hard body, put into motion, moves another body of the same

nature either at rest or in motion, and which it encounters either in a vacuum or in a plenum?

In defending a view previously espoused by Leibniz he found himself postulating an infinite external force required

to make the body elastic by overcoming the infinite internal force making the body hard. In consequence he was

disqualified for the prize, which was won by Maclaurin. However, Bernoulli's paper was subsequently accepted in

1726 when the Acadmie considered papers regarding elastic bodies, for which the prize was awarded to Mazire.

Bernoulli received an honourable mention in both competitions.

Private life

Although Jakob and Johann worked together before Johann graduated from Basel University, shortly after this, the

two developed a jealous and competitive relationship. Johann was jealous of Jakob's position and the two often

attempted to outdo each other. After Jakob's death Johann's jealousy shifted toward his own talented son, Daniel. In

1738 the fatherson duo nearly simultaneously published separate works on hydrodynamics. Johann Bernoulli

attempted to take precedence over his son by purposely predating his work two years prior to his sons.

Johann married Dorothea Falkner, daughter of an Alderman of Basel. He was the father of Nicolaus II Bernoulli,

Daniel Bernoulli and Johann II Bernoulli and uncle of Nicolaus I Bernoulli.

The Bernoulli brothers often worked on the same problems, but not without friction. Their most bitter dispute

concerned finding the equation for the path followed by a particle from one point to another in the shortest time, if

the particle is acted upon by gravity alone, a problem originally discussed by Galileo. In 1697 Jakob offered a reward

for its solution. Accepting the challenge, Johann proposed the cycloid, the path of a point on a moving wheel,

pointing out at the same time the relation this curve bears to the path described by a ray of light passing through

strata of variable density. A protracted, bitter dispute then arose when Jakob challenged the solution and proposed

his own. The dispute marked the origin of a new discipline, the calculus of variations.

Johann Bernoulli

142

L'Hpital controversy

Bernoulli was hired by Guillaume de L'Hpital to tutor him in mathematics. Bernoulli and L'Hpital signed a

contract which gave l'Hpital the right to use Bernoullis discoveries as he pleased. L'Hpital authored the first

textbook on infinitesimal calculus, "Analyse des Infiniment Petits pour l'Intelligence des Lignes Courbes" in 1696,

which mainly consisted of the work of Bernoulli, including what is now known as L'Hpital's rule.

[4][5][6]

Subsequently, in letters to Leibniz, Varignon and others, Bernoulli complained that he had not received enough

credit for his contributions, in spite of the fact that l'Hpital acknowledged fully his debt in the preface of his book:

"Je reconnais devoir beaucoup aux lumires de MM. Bernoulli, surtout celles du jeune (Jean)

prsentement professeur Groningue. Je me suis servi sans faon de leurs dcouvertes et de celles de M.

Leibniz. C'est pourquoi je consens qu'ils en revendiquent tout ce qu'il leur plaira, me contentant de ce

qu'ils voudront bien me laisser."

"I recognize I owe much to Messrs. Bernoulli's insights, above all to the young (John), currently a

professor in Groningue. I did unceremoniously use their discoveries, as well as those of Mr. Leibniz. For

this reason I consent that they claim as much credit as they please, and will content myself with what

they will agree to leave me."

References

[1] A Short History of Mathematics, by V. Sanford, Houghton, Mifflin Company, (1958)

[2] The Bernoulli Family, by H. Bernhard, Doubleday, Page & Company, (1938)

[3] Johann and Jacob Bernoulli, by J.O. Fleckstein, Mathematical Association of America, (1949)

[4] The Story of a Number, by Eli Maor, Princeton University Press, Princeton, (1998) p. 116, ISBN 0-691-05854-7

[5] The Mathematics of Great Amateurs, by Julian Lowell Coolidge, Dover, New York, (1963), pp. 154163

[6] A Source Book in Mathematics, 12001800, ed. D. J. Struck, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, (1969), pp.312316

External links

Johann Bernoulli (http:/ / genealogy. math. ndsu. nodak. edu/ id. php?id=53410) at the Mathematics Genealogy

Project

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Johann Bernoulli" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Bernoulli_Johann. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

Golba, Paul, " Bernoulli, Johan (http:/ / www. shu. edu/ projects/ reals/ history/ bernoull. html)'"

" Johann Bernoulli (http:/ / www. bernoulli. ag. vu/ )"

Weisstein, Eric W., Bernoulli, Johann (16671748) (http:/ / scienceworld. wolfram. com/ biography/

BernoulliJohann. html) from ScienceWorld.

C. Truesdell The New Bernoulli Edition (http:/ / links. jstor. org/ sici?sici=0021-1753(195803)49:1<54:TNBE>2.

0. CO;2-1) Isis, Vol. 49, No. 1. (Mar., 1958), pp.5462, discusses the strange agreement between Bernoulli and

de l'Hpital on pages 5962.

Bernoulli differential equation

143

Bernoulli differential equation

In mathematics, an ordinary differential equation of the form

is called a Bernoulli equation when n1, 0, which is named after Jakob Bernoulli, who discussed it in 1695

(Bernoulli 1695). Bernoulli equations are special because they are nonlinear differential equations with known exact

solutions.

Solution

Dividing by yields

A change of variables is made to transform into a linear first-order differential equation.

The substituted equation can be solved using the integrating factor

Example

Consider the Bernoulli equation

We first notice that is a solution. Division by yields

Changing variables gives the equations

which can be solved using the integrating factor

Multiplying by ,

Note that left side is the derivative of . Integrating both sides results in the equations

Bernoulli differential equation

144

The solution for is

as well as .

Verifying using MATLAB symbolic toolbox by running

x = dsolve('Dy-2*y/x=-x^2*y^2','x')

gives both solutions:

0

x^2/(x^5/5 + C1)

also see a solution

[1]

by WolframAlpha, where the trivial solution is missing.

References

Bernoulli, Jacob (1695), "Explicationes, Annotationes & Additiones ad ea, quae in Actis sup. anni de Curva

Elastica, Isochrona Paracentrica, & Velaria, hinc inde memorata, & paratim controversa legundur; ubi de Linea

mediarum directionum, alliisque novis", Acta Eruditorum. Cited in Hairer, Nrsett & Wanner (1993).

Hairer, Ernst; Nrsett, Syvert Paul; Wanner, Gerhard (1993), Solving ordinary differential equations I: Nonstiff

problems, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN978-3-540-56670-0.

External links

Bernoulli equation

[2]

, PlanetMath.org.

Differential equation

[3]

, PlanetMath.org.

Index of differential equations

[4]

, PlanetMath.org.

References

[1] http:/ / www. wolframalpha. com/ input/ ?i=y%27-2*y%2Fx%3D-x^2*y^2

[2] http:/ / planetmath.org/ ?op=getobj& amp;from=objects& amp;id=7032

[3] http:/ / planetmath.org/ ?op=getobj& amp;from=objects& amp;id=2629

[4] http:/ / planetmath.org/ ?op=getobj& amp;from=objects& amp;id=7023

Bernoulli distribution

145

Bernoulli distribution

Bernoulli

Parameters

Support

PMF

CDF

Mean

Median

Mode

Variance

Skewness

Ex. kurtosis

Entropy

MGF

CF

PGF

Fisher information

In probability theory and statistics, the Bernoulli distribution, named after Swiss scientist Jacob Bernoulli, is a

discrete probability distribution, which takes value 1 with success probability and value 0 with failure probability

. So if X is a random variable with this distribution, we have:

A classical example of a Bernoulli experiment is a single toss of a coin. The coin might come up heads with

probability p and tails with probability 1-p. The experiment is called fair if p=0.5, indicating the origin of the

terminology in betting (the bet is fair if both possible outcomes have the same probability).

The probability mass function f of this distribution is

This can also be expressed as

Bernoulli distribution

146

The expected value of a Bernoulli random variable X is , and its variance is

Bernoulli distribution is a special case of the Binomial distribution with n = 1.

[1]

The kurtosis goes to infinity for high and low values of p, but for the Bernoulli distribution has a lower

kurtosis than any other probability distribution, namely -2.

The Bernoulli distributions for 0p1 form an exponential family.

The maximum likelihood estimator of p based on a random sample is the sample mean.

Related distributions

If are independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables, all Bernoulli distributed with

success probabilityp, then (binomial distribution). The Bernoulli

distribution is simply .

The categorical distribution is the generalization of the Bernoulli distribution for variables with any constant

number of discrete values.

The Beta distribution is the conjugate prior of the Bernoulli distribution.

The geometric distribution is the number of Bernoulli trials needed to get one success.

Notes

[1] [1] McCullagh and Nelder (1989), Section 4.2.2.

References

McCullagh, Peter; Nelder, John (1989). Generalized Linear Models, Second Edition. Boca Raton: Chapman and

Hall/CRC. ISBN0-412-31760-5.

Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Kemp A. (1993) Univariate Discrete Distributions (2nd Edition). Wiley. ISBN

0-471-54897-9

External links

Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "Binomial distribution" (http:/ / www. encyclopediaofmath. org/ index.

php?title=p/ b016420), Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN978-1-55608-010-4

Weisstein, Eric W., " Bernoulli Distribution (http:/ / mathworld. wolfram. com/ BernoulliDistribution. html)"

from MathWorld.

Bernoulli number

147

Bernoulli number

In mathematics, the Bernoulli numbers B

n

are a sequence of rational numbers with deep connections to number

theory. The values of the first few Bernoulli numbers are

B

0

=1, B

1

=

1

2

, B

2

=

1

6

, B

3

=0, B

4

=

1

30

, B

5

=0, B

6

=

1

42

, B

7

=0, B

8

=

1

30

.

If the convention B

1

=

1

2

is used, this sequence is also known as the first Bernoulli numbers (A027641 / A027642

in OEIS); with the convention B

1

=+

1

2

is known as the second Bernoulli numbers (A164555 / A027642 in OEIS).

Except for this one difference, the first and second Bernoulli numbers agree. Since B

n

=0 for all odd n>1, and many

formulas only involve even-index Bernoulli numbers, some authors write B

n

instead of B

2n

.

The Bernoulli numbers appear in the Taylor series expansions of the tangent and hyperbolic tangent functions, in

formulas for the sum of powers of the first positive integers, in the EulerMaclaurin formula, and in expressions for

certain values of the Riemann zeta function.

The Bernoulli numbers were discovered around the same time by the Swiss mathematician Jakob Bernoulli, after

whom they are named, and independently by Japanese mathematician Seki Kwa. Seki's discovery was

posthumously published in 1712

[1][2]

in his work Katsuyo Sampo; Bernoulli's, also posthumously, in his Ars

Conjectandi of 1713. Ada Lovelace's note G on the analytical engine from 1842 describes an algorithm for

generating Bernoulli numbers with Babbage's machine.

[3]

As a result, the Bernoulli numbers have the distinction of

being the subject of the first computer program.

Sum of powers

Bernoulli numbers feature prominently in the closed form expression of the sum of the m-th powers of the first n

positive integers. For m, n 0 define

This expression can always be rewritten as a polynomial in n of degree m+1. The coefficients of these polynomials

are related to the Bernoulli numbers by Bernoulli's formula:

where the convention B

1

=+1/2 is used. ( denotes the binomial coefficient, m+1 choose k.)

For example, taking m to be 1 gives the triangular numbers 0,1,3,6,... (sequence A000217 in OEIS).

Taking m to be 2 gives the square pyramidal numbers 0,1,5,14,... (sequence A000330 in OEIS).

Some authors use the convention B

1

=1/2 and state Bernoulli's formula in this way:

Bernoulli's formula is sometimes called Faulhaber's formula after Johann Faulhaber who also found remarkable ways

to calculate sum of powers.

Faulhaber's formula was generalized by V. Guo and J. Zeng to a q-analog (Guo & Zeng 2005).

Bernoulli number

148

Definitions

Many characterizations of the Bernoulli numbers have been found in the last 300 years, and each could be used to

introduce these numbers. Here only four of the most useful ones are mentioned:

a recursive equation,

an explicit formula,

a generating function,

an algorithmic description.

For the proof of the equivalence of the four approaches the reader is referred to mathematical expositions like

(Ireland & Rosen 1990) or (Conway & Guy 1996).

Unfortunately in the literature the definition is given in two variants: Despite the fact that Bernoulli defined B

1

=1/2

(now known as "second Bernoulli numbers"), some authors set B

1

=1/2 ("first Bernoulli numbers"). In order to

prevent potential confusions both variants will be described here, side by side. Because these two definitions can be

transformed simply by into the other, some formulae have this alternatingly (-1)

n

-term and others

not depending on the context, but it is not possible to decide in favor of one of these definitions to be the correct or

appropriate or natural one (for the abstract Bernoulli numbers).

Recursive definition

The recursive equation is best introduced in a slightly more general form

This defines polynomials B

m

in the variable n known as the Bernoulli polynomials. The recursion can also be viewed

as defining rational numbers B

m

(n) for all integers n0, m 0. The expression 0

0

has to be interpreted as 1. The

first and second Bernoulli numbers now follow by setting n=0 (resulting in B

1

=

1

2

, "first Bernoulli numbers")

respectively n=1 (resulting in B

1

=+

1

2

, "second Bernoulli numbers").

Here the expression [m=0] has the value 1 if m=0 and 0 otherwise (Iverson bracket). Whenever a confusion

between the two kinds of definitions might arise it can be avoided by referring to the more general definition and by

reintroducing the erased parameter: writing B

m

(0) in the first case and B

m

(1) in the second will unambiguously

denote the value in question.

Bernoulli number

149

Explicit definition

Starting again with a slightly more general formula

the choices n=0 and n=1 lead to

There is a widespread misinformation that no simple closed formulas for the Bernoulli numbers exist (Gould 1972).

The last two equations show that this is not true. Moreover, already in 1893 Louis Saalschtz listed a total of 38

explicit formulas for the Bernoulli numbers (Saalschtz 1893), usually giving some reference in the older literature.

Generating function

The general formula for the generating function is

The choices n=0 and n=1 lead to

Algorithmic description

Although the above recursive formula can be used for computation it is mainly used to establish the connection with

the sum of powers because it is computationally expensive. However, both simple and high-end algorithms for

computing Bernoulli numbers exist. Pointers to high-end algorithms are given the next section. A simple one is given

in pseudocode below.

Algorithm AkiyamaTanigawa algorithm for second Bernoulli numbers B

n

Input: Integer n0.

Output: Second Bernoulli number B

n

.

for m from 0 by 1 to n do

A[m] 1/(m+1)

for j from m by -1 to 1 do

A[j-1] j(A[j-1] - A[j])

return A[0] (which is B

n

)

"" is a shorthand for "changes to". For instance, "largest item" means that the value of largest changes to the value of item.

"return" terminates the algorithm and outputs the value that follows.

Bernoulli number

150

Efficient computation of Bernoulli numbers

In some applications it is useful to be able to compute the Bernoulli numbers B

0

through B

p3

modulo p, where p is

a prime; for example to test whether Vandiver's conjecture holds for p, or even just to determine whether p is an

irregular prime. It is not feasible to carry out such a computation using the above recursive formulae, since at least (a

constant multiple of) p

2

arithmetic operations would be required. Fortunately, faster methods have been developed

(Buhler et al. 2001) which require only O(p(logp)

2

) operations (see big-O notation).

David Harvey (Harvey 2008) describes an algorithm for computing Bernoulli numbers by computing B

n

modulo p

for many small primes p, and then reconstructing B

n

via the Chinese Remainder Theorem. Harvey writes that the

asymptotic time complexity of this algorithm is O(n

2

log(n)

2+eps

) and claims that this implementation is significantly

faster than implementations based on other methods. Using this implementation Harvey computed B

n

for n=10

8

.

Harvey's implementation is included in Sage since version 3.1. Pavel Holoborodko (Holoborodko 2012) computed

B

n

for n=2*10

8

using Harvey's implementation, which is a new record. Prior to that Bernd Kellner (Kellner 2002)

computed B

n

to full precision for n=10

6

in December 2002 and Oleksandr Pavlyk (Pavlyk 2008) for n=10

7

with

'Mathematica' in April 2008.

Computer Year n Digits*

J. Bernoulli ~1689 10 1

L. Euler 1748 30 8

J.C. Adams 1878 62 36

D.E. Knuth, T.J. Buckholtz 1967 1672 3330

G. Fee, S. Plouffe 1996 10000 27677

G. Fee, S. Plouffe 1996 100000 376755

B.C. Kellner 2002 1000000 4767529

O. Pavlyk 2008 10000000 57675260

D. Harvey 2008 100000000 676752569

P. Holoborodko 2012 200000000

Digits is to be understood as the exponent of 10 when B(n) is written as a real in normalized scientific notation.

Different viewpoints and conventions

The Bernoulli numbers can be regarded from four main viewpoints:

as standalone arithmetical objects,

as combinatorial objects,

as values of a sequence of certain polynomials,

as values of the Riemann zeta function.

Each of these viewpoints leads to a set of more or less different conventions.

Bernoulli numbers as standalone arithmetical objects.

Associated sequence: 1/6, 1/30, 1/42, 1/30,

This is the viewpoint of Jakob Bernoulli. (See the cutout from his Ars Conjectandi, first edition, 1713). The

Bernoulli numbers are understood as numbers, recursive in nature, invented to solve a certain arithmetical problem,

the summation of powers, which is the paradigmatic application of the Bernoulli numbers. These are also the

numbers appearing in the Taylor series expansion of tan(x) and tanh(x). It is misleading to call this viewpoint

'archaic'. For example Jean-Pierre Serre uses it in his highly acclaimed book A Course in Arithmetic which is a

standard textbook used at many universities today.

Bernoulli number

151

Bernoulli numbers as combinatorial objects.

Associated sequence: 1,+1/2,1/6,0,

This view focuses on the connection between Stirling numbers and Bernoulli numbers and arises naturally in the

calculus of finite differences. In its most general and compact form this connection is summarized by the definition

of the Stirling polynomials -

n

(x), formula (6.52) in Concrete Mathematics by Graham, Knuth and Patashnik.

In consequence B

n

=n! -

n

(1) for n0.

Bernoulli numbers as values of a sequence of certain polynomials.

Assuming the Bernoulli polynomials as already introduced the Bernoulli numbers can be defined in two different

ways:

B

n

=B

n

(0). Associated sequence: 1, 1/2, 1/6, 0,

B

n

=B

n

(1). Associated sequence: 1, +1/2, 1/6, 0,

The two definitions differ only in the sign of B

1

. The choice B

n

=B

n

(0) is the convention used in the Handbook of

Mathematical Functions.

The Bernoulli numbers as given by the Riemann zeta function.

Bernoulli numbers as values of the Riemann zeta

function.

Associated sequence: 1, +1/2, 1/6, 0,

Using this convention, the values of the Riemann zeta

function satisfy n(1n)=B

n

for all integers n0.

(See the paper of S. C. Woon; the expression n(1n)

for n=0 is to be understood as lim

x0

x(1x).)

Applications of the Bernoulli

numbers

Asymptotic analysis

Arguably the most important application of the Bernoulli number in mathematics is their use in the

EulerMacLaurin formula. Assuming that is a sufficiently often differentiable function the EulerMacLaurin

formula can be written as

[4]

This formulation assumes the convention B

1

= 1/2. Using the convention B

1

= 1/2 the formula becomes

Here

(0)

= which is a commonly used notation identifying the zero-th derivative of with . Moreover, let

(1)

denote an antiderivative of . By the fundamental theorem of calculus,

Thus the last formula can be further simplified to the following succinct form of the EulerMaclaurin formula

Bernoulli number

152

This form is for example the source for the important EulerMacLaurin expansion of the zeta function (B

1

=

1

2

)

Here denotes the rising factorial power.

[5]

Bernoulli numbers are also frequently used in other kinds of asymptotic expansions. The following example is the

classical Poincar-type asymptotic expansion of the digamma function (again B

1

=

1

2

).

Taylor series of tan and tanh

The Bernoulli numbers appear in the Taylor series expansion of the tangent and the hyperbolic tangent functions:

Use in topology

The KervaireMilnor formula for the order of the cyclic group of diffeomorphism classes of exotic (4n1)-spheres

which bound parallelizable manifolds involves Bernoulli numbers. Let ES

n

be the number of such exotic spheres for

n2, then

The Hirzebruch signature theorem for the L genus of a smooth oriented closed manifold of dimension 4n also

involves Bernoulli numbers.

Combinatorial definitions

The connection of the Bernoulli number to various kinds of combinatorial numbers is based on the classical theory

of finite differences and on the combinatorial interpretation of the Bernoulli numbers as an instance of a fundamental

combinatorial principle, the inclusion-exclusion principle.

Connection with Worpitzky numbers

The definition to proceed with was developed by Julius Worpitzky in 1883. Besides elementary arithmetic only the

factorial function n! and the power function k

m

is employed. The signless Worpitzky numbers are defined as

They can also be expressed through the Stirling numbers of the second kind

Bernoulli number

153

A Bernoulli number is then introduced as an inclusion-exclusion sum of Worpitzky numbers weighted by the

sequence 1,1/2,1/3,

This representation has B

1

=1/2.

Worpitzky's representation of the Bernoulli number

B

0

= 1/1

B

1

= 1/11/2

B

2

= 1/13/2+2/3

B

3

= 1/17/2+12/36/4

B

4

= 1/115/2+50/360/4+24/5

B

5

= 1/131/2+180/3390/4+360/5120/6

B

6

= 1/163/2+602/32100/4+3360/52520/6+720/7

A second formula representing the Bernoulli numbers by the Worpitzky numbers is for n1

Connection with Stirling numbers of the second kind

If denotes Stirling numbers of the second kind

[6]

then one has:

where denotes the falling factorial.

If one defines the Bernoulli polynomials as

[7]

:

where for are the Bernoulli numbers.

Then after the following property of binomial coefficient:

one has,

One also has following for Bernoulli polynomials,

[7]

The coefficient of j in is

Comparing the coefficient of j in the two expressions of Bernoulli polynomials, one has:

Bernoulli number

154

(resulting in B

1

=1/2) which is an explicit formula for Bernoulli numbers and can be used to prove Von-Staudt

Clausen theorem.

[8][9][10]

Connection with Stirling numbers of the first kind

The two main formulas relating the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind to the Bernoulli numbers (with

B

1

=1/2) are

and the inversion of this sum (for n0, m0)

Here the number A

n,m

are the rational AkiyamaTanigawa numbers, the first few of which are displayed in the

following table.

AkiyamaTanigawa number

n \ m 0 1 2 3 4

0 1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5

1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 ...

2 1/6 1/6 3/20 ... ...

3 0 1/30 ... ... ...

4 1/30 ... ... ... ...

The AkiyamaTanigawa numbers satisfy a simple recurrence relation which can be exploited to iteratively compute

the Bernoulli numbers. This leads to the algorithm shown in the section 'algorithmic description' above.

Connection with Eulerian numbers

There are formulas connecting Eulerian numbers to Bernoulli numbers:

Both formulas are valid for n0 if B

1

is set to . If B

1

is set to they are valid only for n1 and n2

respectively.

Bernoulli number

155

Connection with Balmer series

A link between Bernoulli numbers and Balmer series could be seen in sequence A191567 in OEIS.

Representation of the second Bernoulli numbers

See A191302 in OEIS. The number are not reduced. Then the columns are easy to find, the denominators being

A190339.

Representation of the second Bernoulli numbers

B

0

= 1=2/2

B

1

= 1/2

B

2

= 1/22/6

B

3

= 1/23/6

B

4

= 1/24/6+2/15

B

5

= 1/25/6+5/15

B

6

= 1/26/6+9/158/105

B

7

= 1/27/6+14/1528/105

A binary tree representation

The Stirling polynomials -

n

(x) are related to the Bernoulli numbers by B

n

=n!-

n

(1). S. C. Woon (Woon 1997)

described an algorithm to compute -

n

(1) as a binary tree.

Woon's tree for -

n

(1)

Woon's recursive algorithm (for n1) starts by assigning to the root node N=[1,2]. Given a node N=[a

1

,a

2

,..., a

k

]

of the tree, the left child of the node is L(N)=[a

1

,a

2

+1,a

3

,...,a

k

] and the right child R(N) = [a

1

,2,a

2

,...,a

k

]. A

node N=[a

1

,a

2

,..., a

k

] is written as [a

2

,..., a

k

] in the initial part of the tree represented above with denoting the

sign of a

1.

Given a node N the factorial

of

N is defined as

Restricted to the nodes N of a fixed tree-level n the sum of 1/N! is -

n(1), thus

Bernoulli number

156

For example B

1

= 1!(1/2!), B

2

= 2!(1/3!+1/(2!2!)), B

3

=3!(1/4!1/(2!3!)1/(3!2!)+1/(2!2!2!)).

Asymptotic approximation

Leonhard Euler expressed the Bernoulli numbers in terms of the Riemann zeta function as

It then follows from the Stirling formula that, as n goes to infinity,

Including more terms from the zeta series yields a better approximation, as does factoring in the asymptotic series in

Stirling's approximation.

Integral representation and continuation

The integral

has as special values b(2n) = B

2n

for n>0. The integral might be considered as a continuation of the Bernoulli

numbers to the complex plane and this was indeed suggested by Peter Luschny in 2004.

For example b(3) = (3/2)(3)

3

and b(5) = (15/2)(5)

5

. Here (n) denotes the Riemann zeta function and

the imaginary unit. It is remarkable that already Leonhard Euler (Opera Omnia, Ser. 1, Vol. 10, p.351) considered

these numbers and calculated

Euler's values are unsigned and real, but obviously his aim was to find a meaningful way to define the Bernoulli

numbers at the odd integers n>1.

The relation to the Euler numbers and

The Euler numbers are a sequence of integers intimately connected with the Bernoulli numbers. Comparing the

asymptotic expansions of the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers shows that the Euler numbers E

2n

are in magnitude

approximately (2/)(4

2n

2

2n

) times larger than the Bernoulli numbers B

2n

. In consequence:

This asymptotic equation reveals that lies in the common root of both the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers. In fact

could be computed from these rational approximations.

Bernoulli numbers can be expressed through the Euler numbers and vice versa. Since for n odd B

n

=E

n

=0 (with the

exception B

1

), it suffices to consider the case when n is even.

Bernoulli number

157

These conversion formulas express an inverse relation between the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers. But more

important, there is a deep arithmetic root common to both kinds of numbers, which can be expressed through a more

fundamental sequence of numbers, also closely tied to . These numbers are defined for n>1 as

and S

1

= 1 by convention (Elkies 2003). The magic of these numbers lies in the fact that they turn out to be rational

numbers. This was first proved by Leonhard Euler in a landmark paper (Euler 1735) De summis serierum

reciprocarum (On the sums of series of reciprocals) and has fascinated mathematicians ever since. The first few of

these numbers are

The Bernoulli numbers and Euler numbers are best understood as special views of these numbers, selected from the

sequence S

n

and scaled for use in special applications.

The expression [n even] has the value 1 if n is even and 0 otherwise (Iverson bracket).

These identities show that the quotient of Bernoulli and Euler numbers at the beginning of this section is just the

special case of R

n

=2S

n

/S

n+1

when n is even. The R

n

are rational approximations to and two successive terms

always enclose the true value of . Beginning with n=1 the sequence starts

These rational numbers also appear in the last paragraph of Euler's paper cited above.

An algorithmic view: the Seidel triangle

The sequence S

n

has another unexpected yet important property: The denominators of S

n

divide the factorial (n1)!.

In other words: the numbers T

n

=S

n

(n1)! are integers.

Thus the above representations of the Bernoulli and Euler numbers can be rewritten in terms of this sequence as

These identities make it easy to compute the Bernoulli and Euler numbers: the Euler numbers E

n

are given

immediately by T

2n+1

and the Bernoulli numbers B

2n

are obtained from T

2n

by some easy shifting, avoiding rational

arithmetic.

What remains is to find a convenient way to compute the numbers T

n

. However, already in 1877 Philipp Ludwig von

Seidel (Seidel 1877) published an ingenious algorithm which makes it extremely simple to calculate T

n

.

Bernoulli number

158

Seidel's algorithm for T

n

[begin] Start by putting 1 in row 0 and let k denote the number of the row currently being filled. If k is odd, then put

the number on the left end of the row k1 in the first position of the row k, and fill the row from the left to the right,

with every entry being the sum of the number to the left and the number to the upper. At the end of the row duplicate

the last number. If k is even, proceed similar in the other direction. [end]

Seidel's algorithm is in fact much more general (see the exposition of Dominique Dumont (Dumont 1981)) and was

rediscovered several times thereafter.

Similar to Seidel's approach D. E. Knuth and T. J. Buckholtz (Knuth & Buckholtz 1967) gave a recurrence equation

for the numbers T

2n

and recommended this method for computing B

2n

and E

2n

on electronic computers using only

simple operations on integers.

V. I. Arnold rediscovered Seidel's algorithm in (Arnold 1991) and later Millar, Sloane and Young popularized

Seidel's algorithm under the name boustrophedon transform.

A combinatorial view: alternating permutations

Around 1880, three years after the publication of Seidel's algorithm, Dsir Andr proved a now classic result of

combinatorial analysis (Andr 1879) & (Andr 1881). Looking at the first terms of the Taylor expansion of the

trigonometric functions tan x and sec x Andr made a startling discovery.

The coefficients are the Euler numbers of odd and even index, respectively. In consequence the ordinary expansion

of tanx+secx has as coefficients the rational numbers S

n

.

Andr then succeeded by means of a recurrence argument to show that the alternating permutations of odd size are

enumerated by the Euler numbers of odd index (also called tangent numbers) and the alternating permutations of

even size by the Euler numbers of even index (also called secant numbers).

Bernoulli number

159

Related sequences

The arithmetic mean of the first and the second Bernoulli numbers are the associate Bernoulli numbers: B

0

= 1, B

1

=

0, B

2

= 1/6, B

3

= 0, B

4

= -1/30, A176327 / A027642 in OEIS. Via the second row of its inverse Akiyama-Tanigawa

transform (sequence A177427 in OEIS), they lead to Balmer series A061037 / A061038.

A companion to the second Bernoulli numbers

See A190339. These numbers are the eigensequence of the first kind. A191754 / A192366 = 0, 1/2, 1/2, 1/3, 1/6,

1/15, 1/30, 1/35, 1/70, -1/105, -1/210, 41/1155, 41/2310, -589/5005, -589/10010 ...

Arithmetical properties of the Bernoulli numbers

The Bernoulli numbers can be expressed in terms of the Riemann zeta function as B

n

= n(1 n) for integers n 0

provided for n = 0 and n = 1 the expression n(1 n) is understood as the limiting value and the convention B

1

=

1/2 is used. This intimately relates them to the values of the zeta function at negative integers. As such, they could be

expected to have and do have deep arithmetical properties. For example, the AgohGiuga conjecture postulates that

p is a prime number if and only if pB

p1

is congruent to 1 modulo p. Divisibility properties of the Bernoulli

numbers are related to the ideal class groups of cyclotomic fields by a theorem of Kummer and its strengthening in

the Herbrand-Ribet theorem, and to class numbers of real quadratic fields by AnkenyArtinChowla.

The Kummer theorems

The Bernoulli numbers are related to Fermat's last theorem (FLT) by Kummer's theorem (Kummer 1850), which

says:

If the odd prime p does not divide any of the numerators of the Bernoulli numbers B

2

,B

4

,...,B

p3

then

x

p

+y

p

+z

p

=0 has no solutions in non-zero integers.

Prime numbers with this property are called regular primes. Another classical result of Kummer (Kummer 1851) are

the following congruences.

Let p be an odd prime and b an even number such that p1 does not divideb. Then for any non-negative integerk

A generalization of these congruences goes by the name of p-adic continuity.

p-adic continuity

If b, m and n are positive integers such that m and n are not divisible by p1 and , then

Since B

n

= n (1 n), this can also be written

where u =1m and v =1n, so that u and v are nonpositive and not congruent to 1 modulo p1. This tells us that

the Riemann zeta function, with 1p

s

taken out of the Euler product formula, is continuous in the p-adic numbers

on odd negative integers congruent modulo p1 to a particular , and so can be extended to a

continuous function

p

(s) for all p-adic integers , the p-adic zeta function.

Bernoulli number

160

Ramanujan's congruences

The following relations, due to Ramanujan, provide a method for calculating Bernoulli numbers that is more

efficient than the one given by their original recursive definition:

Von StaudtClausen theorem

The von StaudtClausen theorem was given by Karl Georg Christian von Staudt (von Staudt 1840) and Thomas

Clausen (Clausen 1840) independently in 1840. The theorem states that for every n > 0,

is an integer. The sum extends over all primes p for which p1 divides 2n.

A consequence of this is that the denominator of B

2n

is given by the product of all primes p for which p1 divides

2n. In particular, these denominators are square-free and divisible by6.

Why do the odd Bernoulli numbers vanish?

The sum

can be evaluated for negative values of the index n. Doing so will show that it is an odd function for even values of

k, which implies that the sum has only terms of odd index. This and the formula for the Bernoulli sum imply that

B

2k+1m

is 0 for m odd and greater than 1; and that the term for B

1

is cancelled by the subtraction. The

vonStaudtClausen theorem combined with Worpitzky's representation also gives a combinatorial answer to this

question (valid for n>1).

From the von StaudtClausen theorem it is known that for odd n>1 the number 2B

n

is an integer. This seems trivial

if one knows beforehand that in this case B

n

=0. However, by applying Worpitzky's representation one gets

as a sum of integers, which is not trivial. Here a combinatorial fact comes to surface which explains the vanishing of

the Bernoulli numbers at odd index. Let S

n,m

be the number of surjective maps from {1,2,...,n} to {1,2,...,m}, then

. The last equation can only hold if

This equation can be proved by induction. The first two examples of this equation are

n=4: 2+8=7+3,

n=6: 2+120+144=31+195+40.

Thus the Bernoulli numbers vanish at odd index because some non-obvious combinatorial identities are embodied in

the Bernoulli numbers.

Bernoulli number

161

A restatement of the Riemann hypothesis

The connection between the Bernoulli numbers and the Riemann zeta function is strong enough to provide an

alternate formulation of the Riemann hypothesis (RH) which uses only the Bernoulli number. In fact Marcel Riesz

(Riesz 1916) proved that the RH is equivalent to the following assertion:

For every >1/4 there exists a constant C

x

as x.

Here R(x) is the Riesz function

denotes the rising factorial power in the notation of D. E. Knuth. The number

n

= B

n

/n occur frequently in the

study of the zeta function and are significant because

n

is a p-integer for primes p where p1 does not divide n.

The

n

are called divided Bernoulli number.

History

Early history

The Bernoulli numbers are rooted in the early history of the computation of sums of integer powers, which have

been of interest to mathematicians since antiquity.

A page from Seki Kwa's Katsuyo Sampo (1712),

tabulating binomial coefficients and Bernoulli

numbers

Methods to calculate the sum of the first n positive integers, the sum of

the squares and of the cubes of the first n positive integers were

known, but there were no real 'formulas', only descriptions given

entirely in words. Among the great mathematicians of antiquity which

considered this problem were: Pythagoras (c. 572497 BCE, Greece),

Archimedes (287212 BCE, Italy), Aryabhata (b. 476, India), Abu

Bakr al-Karaji (d. 1019, Persia) and Abu Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Hasan ibn

al-Haytham (9651039, Iraq).

During the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries

mathematicians made significant progress. In the West Thomas Harriot

(15601621) of England, Johann Faulhaber (15801635) of Germany,

Pierre de Fermat (16011665) and fellow French mathematician Blaise

Pascal (16231662) all played important roles.

Thomas Harriot seems to have been the first to derive and write

formulas for sums of powers using symbolic notation, but even he

calculated only up to the sum of the fourth powers. Johann Faulhaber

gave formulas for sums of powers up to the 17th power in his 1631

Academia Algebrae, far higher than anyone before him, but he did not

give a general formula.

The Swiss mathematician Jakob Bernoulli (16541705) was the first to realize the existence of a single sequence of

constants B

0

, B

1

, B

2

,... which provide a uniform formula for all sums of powers (Knuth 1993).

The joy Bernoulli experienced when he hit upon the pattern needed to compute quickly and easily the coefficients of

his formula for the sum of the c-th powers for any positive integer c can be seen from his comment. He wrote:

With the help of this table, it took me less than half of a quarter of an hour to find that the tenth powers of the first

1000 numbers being added together will yield the sum

91,409,924,241,424,243,424,241,924,242,500.

Bernoulli number

162

Bernoulli's result was published posthumously in Ars Conjectandi in 1713. Seki Kwa independently discovered the

Bernoulli numbers and his result was published a year earlier, also posthumously, in 1712.

[1]

However, Seki did not

present his method as a formula based on a sequence of constants.

Bernoulli's formula for sums of powers is the most useful and generalizable formulation to date. The coefficients in

Bernoulli's formula are now called Bernoulli numbers, following a suggestion of Abraham de Moivre.

Bernoulli's formula is sometimes called Faulhaber's formula after Johann Faulhaber who found remarkable ways to

calculate sum of powers but never stated Bernoulli's formula. To call Bernoulli's formula Faulhaber's formula does

injustice to Bernoulli and simultaneously hides the genius of Faulhaber as Faulhaber's formula is in fact more

efficient than Bernoulli's formula. According to Knuth (Knuth 1993) a rigorous proof of Faulhabers formula was

first published by Carl Jacobi in 1834 (Jacobi 1834). Donald E. Knuth's in-depth study of Faulhaber's formula

concludes:

Faulhaber never discovered the Bernoulli numbers; i.e., he never realized that a single sequence of constants B

0

,

B

1

, B

2

, ... would provide a uniform

for all sums of powers. He never mentioned, for example, the fact that almost half of the coefficients turned out to be

zero after he had converted his formulas for from polynomials in N to polynomials in n. (Knuth 1993, p.14)

Reconstruction of "Summae Potestatum"

Jakob Bernoulli's Summae Potestatum, 1713

The Bernoulli numbers were introduced by Jakob Bernoulli in the book

Ars Conjectandi published posthumously in 1713. The main formula

can be seen in the second half of the corresponding facsimile. The

constant coefficients denoted A, B, C and D by Bernoulli are mapped

to the notation which is now prevalent as A=B

2

, B=B

4

, C=B

6

,

D=B

8

. In the expression cc1c2c3 the small dots are used as

grouping symbols, not as signs for multiplication. Using today's

terminology these expressions are falling factorial powers . The

factorial notation k! as a shortcut for 12...k was not introduced

until 100 years later. The integral symbol on the left hand side goes

back to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in 1675 who used it as a long letter

S for "summa" (sum). (The Mathematics Genealogy Project

[11]

shows

Leibniz as the doctoral adviser of Jakob Bernoulli. See also the Earliest

Uses of Symbols of Calculus.

[12]

) The letter n on the left hand side is

not an index of summation but gives the upper limit of the range of

summation which is to be understood as 1,2,,n. Putting things

together, for positive c, today a mathematician is likely to write Bernoulli's formula as:

In fact this formula imperatively suggests to set B

1

= when switching from the so-called 'archaic' enumeration

which uses only the even indices 2, 4, to the modern form (more on different conventions in the next paragraph).

Most striking in this context is the fact that the falling factorial has for k=0 the value .

[13]

Thus Bernoulli's

formula can and has to be written:

Bernoulli number

163

If B

1

stands for the value Bernoulli himself has given to the coefficient at that position.

Generalized Bernoulli numbers

The generalized Bernoulli numbers are certain algebraic numbers, defined similarly to the Bernoulli numbers, that

are related to special values of Dirichlet L-functions in the same way that Bernoulli numbers are related to special

values of the Riemann zeta function.

Let be a primitive Dirichlet character modulo f. The generalized Bernoulli numbers attached to are defined by

Let {0,1} be defined by (1)=(1)

. Then,

B

k,

0 if, and only if, k (mod 2).

Generalizing the relation between Bernoulli numbers and values of the Riemann zeta function at non-positive

integers, one has the for all integers k1

where L(s,) is the Dirichlet L-function of .

[14]

Appendix

Assorted identities

Umbral calculus gives a compact form of Bernoulli's formula by using an abstract symbol B:

where the symbol that appears during binomial expansion of the parenthesized term is to be replaced by the

Bernoulli number (and ). More suggestively and mnemonically, this may be written as a definite

integral:

Many other Bernoulli identities can be written compactly with this symbol, e.g.

Let n be non-negative and even

The nth cumulant of the uniform probability distribution on the interval [1,0] is B

n

/n.

Let n = 1/n! and n 1. Then B

n

is the following determinant:

Bernoulli number

164

B

n

=

1

n

2 1 0 0 0 ... 0

3 2 1 0 0 ... 0

4 3 2 1 0 ... 0

... ... ... ... ... ... ...

(n1) ... ... 3 2 1 0

n (n1) ... ... 3 2 1

(n+1) n (n1) ... ... 3 2

Thus the determinant is -

n

(1), the Stirling polynomial at x = 1.

For even-numbered Bernoulli numbers, B

2p

is given by the p X p determinant:

[15]

B

2p

=

(1)

p+1

(2

2p

2)(2p)

3 1 0 0 0 ... 0

5 3 1 0 0 ... 0

7 5 3 1 0 ... 0

... ... ... ... ... ... ...

(2p3) ... ... 5 3 1 0

(2p1) (2p3) ... ... 5 3 1

(2p+1) (2p1) (2p3) ... ... 5 3

Let n 1.

Let n 1. Then (von Ettingshausen 1827)

Let n 0. Then (Leopold Kronecker 1883)

Let n1 and m1. Then (Carlitz 1968)

Let n4 and

the harmonic number. Then

Let n4. Yuri Matiyasevich found (1997)

Bernoulli number

165

Faber-Pandharipande-Zagier-Gessel identity: for n1,

Choosing x=0 or x=1 results in the Bernoulli number identity in one or another convention.

The next formula is true for n 0 if B

1

= B

1

(1) = , but only for n 1 if B

1

= B

1

(0) = .

Let n 0 and [b] = 1 if b is true, 0 otherwise.

and

Values of the first Bernoulli numbers

B

n

= 0 for all odd n other than 1. For even n, B

n

is negative if n is divisible by 4 and positive otherwise. The first few

non-zero Bernoulli numbers are:

n Numerator Denominator Decimal approximation

0 1 1 +1.00000000000

1 1 2 0.50000000000

2 1 6 +0.16666666667

4 1 30 0.03333333333

6 1 42 +0.02380952381

8 1 30 0.03333333333

10 5 66 +0.07575757576

12 691 2730 0.25311355311

14 7 6 +1.16666666667

16 3617 510 7.09215686275

18 43867 798 +54.9711779448

OEIS A027641 A027642

From 6, the denominators are multiples of the sequence of period 2 : 6,30 (sequence A165734 in OEIS). From 2, the

denominators are of the form 4*k + 2.

Bernoulli number

166

Notes

[1] [1] Selin, H. (1997), p. 891

[2] [2] Smith, D. E. (1914), p. 108

[3] Note G in the Menabrea reference

[4] Concrete Mathematics, (9.67).

[5] Concrete Mathematics, (2.44) and (2.52)

[6] [6] L. Comtet, Advanced combinatorics. The art of finite and infinite expansions, Revised and Enlarged Edition, D. Reidel Publ. Co.,

Dordrecht-Boston, 1974.

[7] [7] H. Rademacher, Analytic Number Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973.

[8] H. W. Gould (1972). "Explicit formulas for Bernoulli numbers". Amer. Math. Monthly 79: 4451.

[9] T. M. Apostol. Introduction to Analytic Number Theory. Springer-Verlag. p.197.

[10] G. Boole (1880). A treatise of the calculus of finite differences (3rd ed ed.). London.

[11] Mathematics Genealogy Project (http:/ / genealogy.math. ndsu. nodak. edu/ )

[12] Earliest Uses of Symbols of Calculus (http:/ / jeff560. tripod. com/ calculus. html)

[13] Graham, R.; Knuth, D. E.; Patashnik, O. (1989), Concrete Mathematics (2nd ed.), Addison-Wesley, Section 2.51, ISBN0-201-55802-5

[14] [14] Neukirch 1999, VII.2

[15] [15] Jerome Malenfant (2011). "Finite, closed-form expressions for the partition function and for Euler, Bernoulli, and Stirling numbers".

arXiv:1103.1585[math.NT].

References

Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, C. A. (1972), "23.1: Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials and the Euler-Maclaurin

Formula", Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (9th printing

ed.), New York: Dover, pp.804806.

Andr, D. (1879), "Dveloppements de sec x et tan x", Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 88: 965967.

Andr, D. (1881), "Mmoire sur les permutations alternes", J. Math. 7: 167184.

Arlettaz, D. (1998), "Die Bernoulli-Zahlen: eine Beziehung zwischen Topologie und Gruppentheorie", Math.

Semesterber 45: 6175, doi:10.1007/s005910050037.

Arnold, V. I. (1991), "Bernoulli-Euler updown numbers associated with function singularities, their combinatorics

and arithmetics", Duke Math. J. 63: 537555.

Ayoub, A.; Lee, F. W.; Anderson, J. A.; Vicharelli, P. A.; Popescu, D.; Popescu, Iovitzu (1981), "Euler and the

Zeta Function", Amer. Math. Monthly 74 (2): 10671086.

Buhler, J.; Crandall, R.; Ernvall, R.; Metsankyla, T.; Shokrollahi, M. (2001), "Irregular Primes and Cyclotomic

Invariants to 12 Million", Journal of Symbolic Computation 31 (12): 8996, doi:10.1006/jsco.1999.1011.

Carlitz, L. (1968), "Bernoulli Numbers", Fibonacci Quarterly 6: 7185.

Clausen, Thomas (1840), "Lehrsatz aus einer Abhandlung ber die Bernoullischen Zahlen", Astr. Nachr. 17 (22):

351352, doi:10.1002/asna.18400172205.

Conway, John; Guy (1996), The Book of Numbers, Springer-Verlag.

Dilcher, K.; Skula, L.; Slavutskii, I. Sh. (1991), "Bernoulli numbers. Bibliography (17131990)" (http:/ / www.

mscs. dal. ca/ ~dilcher/ bernoulli. html), Queen's Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics (Kingston, Ontario)

(87).

Dumont, D.; Viennot, G. (1980), "A combinatorial interpretation of Seidel generation of Genocchi numbers",

Ann. Discrete Math., Annals of Discrete Mathematics 6: 7787, doi:10.1016/S0167-5060(08)70696-4,

ISBN978-0-444-86048-4.

Dumont, D. (1981), "Matrices d'Euler-Seidel" (http:/ / emis. u-strasbg. fr/ journals/ SLC/ opapers/ s05dumont.

html), Sminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, B05c, pp.25.

Elkies, N. D. (2003), "On the sums Sum_(k=-infinity...infinity) (4k+1)^(-n)", Amer. Math. Monthly 110 (7):

561573, arXiv:math.CA/0101168

Entringer, R. C. (1966), "A combinatorial interpretation of the Euler and Bernoulli numbers", Nieuw. Arch. V.

Wiskunde 14: 2416.

von Ettingshausen, A. (1827), Vorlesungen ber die hhere Mathematik, Bd. 1, Vienna: Carl Gerold.

Bernoulli number

167

Euler, Leonhard (1735), "De summis serierum reciprocarum", Opera Omnia I.14, E 41,: 7386,

arXiv:math/0506415, Bibcode2005math......6415E

Fee, G.; Plouffe, S. (2007), "An efficient algorithm for the computation of Bernoulli numbers", Eprint

arXiv:math/0702300, arXiv:math/0702300, Bibcode2007math......2300F.

Gould, Henry W. (1972), "Explicit formulas for Bernoulli numbers", Amer. Math. Monthly 79: 4451

Graham, R. L.; Knuth, D. E.; Patashnik, O. (1989), Concrete Mathematics, Addison-Wesley.

Guo, Victor J. W.; Zeng, Jiang (2005), "A q-Analogue of Faulhaber's Formula for Sums of Powers" (http:/ /

www. combinatorics. org/ Volume_11/ Abstracts/ v11i2r19. html), The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 11

(2): 1441, arXiv:math/0501441, Bibcode2005math......1441G.

Harvey, David (2010), "A multimodular algorithm for computing Bernoulli numbers", Math. Comput. 79 (272):

23612370, arXiv:0807.1347, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-2010-02367-1, Zbl05797914.

Holoborodko, Pavel (2012), World Record 200,000,000th Bernoulli Number (http:/ / www. advanpix. com/

2012/ 07/ 17/ world-record-200000000th-bernoulli-number/ ).

Jacobi, C. G. J. (1834), "De usu legitimo formulae summatoriae Maclaurinianae", Journal fr die reine und

angewandte Mathematik 12: 263272.

Jordan, Charles (1950), Calculus of Finite Differences, New York: Chelsea Publ. Co..

Kaneko, M. (2000), "The Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm for Bernoulli numbers" (http:/ / www. cs. uwaterloo. ca/

journals/ JIS/ vol3. html), Journal of Integer Sequences 12: 29, Bibcode2000JIntS...3...29K.

Kellner, Bernd (2002), Program Calcbn A program for calculating Bernoulli numbers (http:/ / www. bernoulli.

org/ ).

Knuth, D. E.; Buckholtz, T. J. (1967), "Computation of Tangent, Euler, and Bernoulli Numbers", Mathematics of

Computation (American Mathematical Society) 21 (100): 663688, doi:10.2307/2005010, JSTOR2005010.

Knuth, D. E. (1993), "Johann Faulhaber and the Sums of Powers", Mathematics of Computation (American

Mathematical Society) 61 (203): 277294, arXiv:math/9207222, doi:10.2307/2152953, JSTOR2152953.

Kummer, E. E. (1850), "Allgemeiner Beweis des Fermat'schen Satzes, dass die Gleichung x

+ y

= z

durch

ganze Zahlen unlsbar ist, fr alle diejenigen Potenz-Exponenten , welche ungerade Primzahlen sind und in den

Zhlern der ersten (-3)/2 Bernoulli'schen Zahlen als Factoren nicht vorkommen" (http:/ / www. digizeitschriften.

de/ resolveppn/ GDZPPN002146738), J. Reine Angew. Math. 40: 131138.

Kummer, E. E. (1851), "ber eine allgemeine Eigenschaft der rationalen Entwicklungscoefficienten einer

bestimmten Gattung analytischer Functionen" (http:/ / resolver. sub. uni-goettingen. de/

purl?GDZPPN002147319), J. Reine Angew. Math. 41: 368372.

Luschny, Peter (2007), An inclusion of the Bernoulli numbers (http:/ / www. luschny. de/ math/ primes/ bernincl.

html).

Menabrea, L. F. (1842), "Sketch of the Analytic Engine invented by Charles Babbage, with notes upon the

Memoir by the Translator Ada Augusta, Countess of Lovelace" (http:/ / www. fourmilab. ch/ babbage/ sketch.

html), Bibliothque Universelle de Genve 82

Milnor, John W.; Stasheff, James D. (1974), "Appendix B: Bernoulli Numbers", Characteristic Classes, Annals

of Mathematics Studies, 76, Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press, pp.281287.

Neukirch, Jrgen (1999), Algebraic Number Theory, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 322,

Berlin: Springer-Verlag, ISBN978-3-540-65399-8, Zbl0956.11021, MR1697859

Pavlyk, Oleksandr (2008), Today We Broke the Bernoulli Record: From the Analytical Engine to Mathematica

(http:/ / blog. wolfram. com/ 2008/ 04/ 29/

today-we-broke-the-bernoulli-record-from-the-analytical-engine-to-mathematica/ ), Wolfram Blog.

Riesz, M. (1916), "Sur l'hypothse de Riemann", Acta Mathematica 40: 18590, doi:10.1007/BF02418544.

Saalschtz, Louis (1893), Vorlesungen ber die Bernoullischen Zahlen, ihren Zusammenhang mit den

Secanten-Coefficienten und ihre wichtigeren Anwendungen (http:/ / digital. library. cornell. edu/ cgi/ t/ text/

text-idx?c=math;idno=00450002), Berlin: Julius Springer.

Bernoulli number

168

Seidel, L. (1877), "ber eine einfache Entstehungsweise der Bernoullischen Zahlen und einiger verwandten

Reihen", Sitzungsber. Mnch. Akad. 4: 157187.

Selin, Helaine, ed. (1997), "Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western

Cultures", Encyclopaedia of the History of Science (Springer): 819, Bibcode2008ehst.book.....S,

ISBN0-7923-4066-3.

Slavutskii, Ilya Sh. (1995), "Staudt and arithmetical properties of Bernoulli numbers", Historia Scientiarum 2:

6974.

Smith, David Eugene; Mikami, Yoshio (1914), A history of Japanese mathematics (http:/ / books. google. com/

?id=pTcQsvfbSu4C& pg=PA108), Open Court publishing company, ISBN978-0-486-43482-7.

von Staudt, K. G. Ch. (1840), "Beweis eines Lehrsatzes, die Bernoullischen Zahlen betreffend", Journal fr die

reine und angewandte Mathematik 21: 372374.

von Staudt, K. G. Ch. (1845), "De numeris Bernoullianis, commentationem alteram", Erlangen.

Sun, Zhi-Wei (2005/2006), Some curious results on Bernoulli and Euler polynomials (http:/ / pweb. nju. edu. cn/

zwsun).

Woon, S. C. (1997), "A tree for generating Bernoulli numbers", Math. Mag. 70 (1): 5156, doi:10.2307/2691054,

JSTOR2691054.

Woon, S. C. (1998). "Generalization of a relation between the Riemann zeta function and Bernoulli numbers".

arXiv:math.NT/9812143[math.NT]..

Worpitzky, J. (1883), "Studien ber die Bernoullischen und Eulerschen Zahlen" (http:/ / resolver. sub.

uni-goettingen. de/ purl?GDZPPN002158698), Journal fr die reine und angewandte Mathematik 94: 203232.

External links

Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "Bernoulli numbers" (http:/ / www. encyclopediaofmath. org/ index.

php?title=p/ b015640), Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN978-1-55608-010-4

The first 498 Bernoulli Numbers (http:/ / www. gutenberg. org/ etext/ 2586) from Project Gutenberg

A multimodular algorithm for computing Bernoulli numbers (http:/ / web. maths. unsw. edu. au/ ~davidharvey/

papers/ bernmm/ )

The Bernoulli Number Page (http:/ / www. bernoulli. org)

Bernoulli number programs (http:/ / en. literateprograms. org/ Category:Bernoulli_numbers) at LiteratePrograms

(http:/ / en. literateprograms. org)

Weisstein, Eric W., " Bernoulli Number (http:/ / mathworld. wolfram. com/ BernoulliNumber. html)" from

MathWorld.

The Computation of Irregular Primes (P. Luschny) (http:/ / www. luschny. de/ math/ primes/ irregular. html)

The Computation And Asymptotics Of Bernoulli Numbers (P. Luschny) (http:/ / oeis. org/ wiki/

User:Peter_Luschny/ ComputationAndAsymptoticsOfBernoulliNumbers)

Bernoullinumbers in context of Pascal-(Binomial)matrix (http:/ / go. helms-net. de/ math/ pascal/ bernoulli_en.

pdf) german version (http:/ / go. helms-net. de/ math/ pascal/ bernoulli. pdf)

summing of like powers in context with Pascal-/Bernoulli-matrix (http:/ / go. helms-net. de/ math/ binomial/

04_3_SummingOfLikePowers. pdf)

Some special properties, sums of Bernoulli-and related numbers (http:/ / go. helms-net. de/ math/ binomial/

02_2_GeneralizedBernoulliRecursion. pdf)

Bernoulli Numbers Calculator (http:/ / www. numberempire. com/ bernoullinumbers. php)

Bernoulli polynomials

169

Bernoulli polynomials

In mathematics, the Bernoulli polynomials occur in the study of many special functions and in particular the

Riemann zeta function and the Hurwitz zeta function. This is in large part because they are an Appell sequence, i.e. a

Sheffer sequence for the ordinary derivative operator. Unlike orthogonal polynomials, the Bernoulli polynomials are

remarkable in that the number of crossings of the x-axis in the unit interval does not go up as the degree of the

polynomials goes up. In the limit of large degree, the Bernoulli polynomials, appropriately scaled, approach the sine

and cosine functions.

Bernoulli polynomials

Representations

The Bernoulli polynomials B

n

admit a variety of different

representations. Which among them should be taken to be the

definition may depend on one's purposes.

Explicit formula

for n 0, where b

k

are the Bernoulli numbers.

Generating functions

The generating function for the Bernoulli polynomials is

The generating function for the Euler polynomials is

Representation by a differential operator

The Bernoulli polynomials are also given by

where D = d/dx is differentiation with respect to x and the fraction is expanded as a formal power series. It follows

that

cf. #Integrals below.

Bernoulli polynomials

170

Representation by an integral operator

The Bernoulli polynomials are the unique polynomials determined by

The integral transform

on polynomials f, simply amounts to

This can be used to produce the #Inversion formulas below.

Another explicit formula

An explicit formula for the Bernoulli polynomials is given by

Note the remarkable similarity to the globally convergent series expression for the Hurwitz zeta function. Indeed,

one has

where (s,q) is the Hurwitz zeta; thus, in a certain sense, the Hurwitz zeta generalizes the Bernoulli polynomials to

non-integer values ofn.

The inner sum may be understood to be the nth forward difference of x

m

; that is,

where is the forward difference operator. Thus, one may write

This formula may be derived from an identity appearing above as follows. Since the forward difference operator

equals

where D is differentiation with respect to x, we have, from the Mercator series

As long as this operates on an mth-degree polynomial such as x

m

, one may let n go from 0 only up tom.

An integral representation for the Bernoulli polynomials is given by the NrlundRice integral, which follows from

the expression as a finite difference.

An explicit formula for the Euler polynomials is given by

This may also be written in terms of the Euler numbers E

k

as

Bernoulli polynomials

171

Sums of pth powers

We have

See Faulhaber's formula for more on this.

The Bernoulli and Euler numbers

The Bernoulli numbers are given by An alternate convention defines the Bernoulli numbers as

. This definition gives B

n

=n(1n) where for n=0 and n=1 the expression n(1n) is to be

understood as lim

xn

x(1x). The two conventions differ only for n=1 since B

1

(1)=1/2=B

1

(0).

The Euler numbers are given by

Explicit expressions for low degrees

The first few Bernoulli polynomials are:

The first few Euler polynomials are

Bernoulli polynomials

172

Maximum and minimum

At higher n, the amount of variation in B

n

(x) between x=0 and x=1 gets large. For instance,

which shows that the value at x=0 (and at x=1) is 3617/510 7.09, while at x=1/2, the value is

118518239/3342336 +7.09. D.H. Lehmer

[1]

showed that the maximum value of B

n

(x) between 0 and 1 obeys

unless n is 2 modulo 4, in which case

(where is the Riemann zeta function), while the minimum obeys

unless n is 0 modulo 4, in which case

These limits are quite close to the actual maximum and minimum, and Lehmer gives more accurate limits as well.

Differences and derivatives

The Bernoulli and Euler polynomials obey many relations from umbral calculus:

( is the forward difference operator).

These polynomial sequences are Appell sequences:

Translations

These identities are also equivalent to saying that these polynomial sequences are Appell sequences. (Hermite

polynomials are another example.)

Bernoulli polynomials

173

Symmetries

Zhi-Wei Sun and Hao Pan

[2]

established the following surprising symmetric relation: If r+s+t=n and

x+y+z=1, then

where

Fourier series

The Fourier series of the Bernoulli polynomials is also a Dirichlet series, given by the expansion

Note the simple large n limit to suitably scaled trigonometric functions.

This is a special case of the analogous form for the Hurwitz zeta function

This expansion is valid only for 0x1 when n2 and is valid for 0<x<1 when n=1.

The Fourier series of the Euler polynomials may also be calculated. Defining the functions

and

for , the Euler polynomial has the Fourier series

and

Note that the and are odd and even, respectively:

and

They are related to the Legendre chi function as

and

Bernoulli polynomials

174

Inversion

The Bernoulli and Euler polynomials may be inverted to express the monomial in terms of the polynomials.

Specifically, evidently from the above section on #Representation by an integral operator, it follows that

and

Relation to falling factorial

The Bernoulli polynomials may be expanded in terms of the falling factorial as

where and

denotes the Stirling number of the second kind. The above may be inverted to express the falling factorial in terms of

the Bernoulli polynomials:

where

denotes the Stirling number of the first kind.

Multiplication theorems

The multiplication theorems were given by Joseph Ludwig Raabe in 1851:

Bernoulli polynomials

175

Integrals

Indefinite integrals

Definite integrals

Periodic Bernoulli polynomials

A periodic Bernoulli polynomial P

n

(x) is a Bernoulli polynomial evaluated at the fractional part of the argument x.

These functions are used to provide the remainder term in the EulerMaclaurin formula relating sums to integrals.

The first polynomial is a sawtooth function.

References

[1] D.H. Lehmer, "On the Maxima and Minima of Bernoulli Polynomials", American Mathematical Monthly, volume 47, pages 533538 (1940)

[2] Zhi-Wei Sun; Hao Pan (2006). "Identities concerning Bernoulli and Euler polynomials". Acta Arithmetica 125: 2139. arXiv:math/0409035.

Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun, eds. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and

Mathematical Tables, (1972) Dover, New York. (See Chapter 23 (http:/ / www. math. sfu. ca/ ~cbm/ aands/

page_804. htm))

Apostol, Tom M. (1976), Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, New

York-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, ISBN978-0-387-90163-3, MR0434929, Zbl0335.10001 (See chapter 12.11)

Dilcher, K. (2010), "Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials" (http:/ / dlmf. nist. gov/ 24), in Olver, Frank W. J.; Lozier,

Daniel M.; Boisvert, Ronald F. et al., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press,

ISBN978-0521192255, MR2723248

Cvijovi, Djurdje; Klinowski, Jacek (1995). "New formulae for the Bernoulli and Euler polynomials at rational

arguments". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 123: 15271535.

Guillera, Jesus; Sondow, Jonathan (2008). "Double integrals and infinite products for some classical constants via

analytic continuations of Lerch's transcendent". The Ramanujan Journal 16 (3): 247270.

arXiv:math.NT/0506319. doi:10.1007/s11139-007-9102-0. (Reviews relationship to the Hurwitz zeta function and

Lerch transcendent.)

Hugh L. Montgomery; Robert C. Vaughan (2007). Multiplicative number theory I. Classical theory. Cambridge

tracts in advanced mathematics. 97. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. pp.495519. ISBN0-521-84903-9.

Bernoulli process

176

Bernoulli process

In probability and statistics, a Bernoulli process is a finite or infinite sequence of binary random variables, so it is a

discrete-time stochastic process that takes only two values, canonically 0 and1. The component Bernoulli variables

X

i

are identical and independent. Prosaically, a Bernoulli process is a repeated coin flipping, possibly with an unfair

coin (but with consistent unfairness!). Every variable X

i

in the sequence is associated with a Bernoulli trial or

experiment. They all have the same Bernoulli distribution. Much of what can be said about the Bernoulli process can

also be generalized to more than two outcomes (such as the process for a six-sided die); this generalization is known

as the Bernoulli scheme.

The problem of determining the process, given only a limited sample of the Bernoulli trials, may be called the

problem of checking if a coin is fair.

Definition

A Bernoulli process is a finite or infinite sequence of independent random variables X

1

,X

2

,X

3

,..., such that

For each i, the value of X

i

is either 0 or1;

For all values of i, the probability that X

i

=1 is the same numberp.

In other words, a Bernoulli process is a sequence of independent identically distributed Bernoulli trials.

Independence of the trials implies that the process is memoryless. Given that the probability p is known, past

outcomes provide no information about future outcomes. (If p is unknown, however, the past informs about the

future indirectly, through inferences aboutp.)

If the process is infinite, then from any point the future trials constitute a Bernoulli process identical to the whole

process, the fresh-start property.

Interpretation

The two possible values of each X

i

are often called "success" and "failure". Thus, when expressed as a number 0 or 1,

the outcome may be called the number of successes on the ith "trial".

Two other common interpretations of the values are true or false and yes or no. Under any interpretation of the two

values, the individual variables X

i

may be called Bernoulli trials with parameter p.

In many applications time passes between trials, as the index i increases. In effect, the trials X

1

,X

2

,...X

i

,... happen

at "points in time" 1,2,...,i,.... That passage of time and the associated notions of "past" and "future" are not

necessary, however. Most generally, any X

i

and X

j

in the process are simply two from a set of random variables

indexed by {1,2,...,n} or by {1,2,3,...}, the finite and infinite cases.

Several random variables and probability distributions beside the Bernoullis may be derived from the Bernoulli

process:

The number of successes in the first n trials, which has a binomial distribution B(n,p)

The number of trials needed to get r successes, which has a negative binomial distribution NB(r,p)

The number of trials needed to get one success, which has a geometric distribution NB(1,p), a special case of the

negative binomial distribution

The negative binomial variables may be interpreted as random waiting times.

Bernoulli process

177

Formal definition

The Bernoulli process can be formalized in the language of probability spaces as a random sequence in

of a single random variable that can take values of heads or tails.

Specifically, one considers the countably infinite direct product of copies of . It is common to

examine either the one-sided set or the two-sided set . There is a natural topology

on this space, called the product topology. The sets in this topology are finite sequences of coin flips, that is,

finite-length strings of H and T, with the rest of (infinitely long) sequence taken as "don't care". These sets of finite

sequences are referred to as cylinder sets in the product topology. The set of all such strings form a sigma algebra,

specifically, a Borel algebra. This algebra is then commonly written as where the elements of are the

finite-length sequences of coin flips (the cylinder sets). Note that the stress here is on finite length: the infinite-length

sequences of coin-flips are excluded from the product topology; that this is a reasonable thing to do will become

clear below.

If the chances of flipping heads or tails are given by the probabilities , then one can define a natural

measure on the product space, given by (or by for the two-sided process).

Given a cylinder set, that is, a specific sequence of coin flip results at times , the

probability of observing this particular sequence is given by

where k is the number of times that H appears in the sequence, and n-k is the number of times that T appears in the

sequence. There are several different kinds of notations for the above; a common one is to write

where each is a binary-valued random variable. It is common to write for . This probability P is

commonly called the Bernoulli measure.

[1]

Note that the probability of any specific, infinitely long sequence of coin flips is exactly zero; this is because

, for any . One says that any given infinite sequence has measure zero. Thus, infinite

sequences of coin-flips are simply not needed to discuss the Bernoulli process, and it is for this reason that the

product topology explicitly excludes them: it is the coarsest topology that allows the discussion of coin-flips. (Finer

topologies, which do allow infinite sequences, can, in fact, lead to certain kinds of confusion and seeming paradoxes;

see e.g. strong topology). Nevertheless, one can still say that some classes of infinite sequences of coin flips are far

more likely than others, this is given by the asymptotic equipartition property.

To conclude the formal definition, a Bernoulli process is then given by the probability triple , as defined

above.

Finite vs. infinite sequences

The sigma algebra for a single coin toss is the set

with the probabilities

Roughly speaking, the sigma algebra for the one-sided infinite case can be thought of as

although a more formally correct definition is given below. For this infinite case, consider the two cylinder sets

Bernoulli process

178

and

Here, the '*' means 'don't care', and so the cylinder set corresponds to 'flipped tails on the first flip, and don't care

about the rest'. The measure of (the probability of ) is

That is, the measure of cylinder set is nothing other than the probability of flipping tails, once. Likewise, one

may consider the cylinder set

of flipping tails twice in a row, followed by an infinite sequence of 'don't care's. The measure of this set is again

exactly equal to the probability of flipping tails twice, and never flipping again. In essence, a finite sequence of flips

corresponds in a one-to-one fashion with a cylinder set taken from the infinite product. The definition of the

Bernoulli process does not need any special treatment to distinguish the 'finite case' from the 'infinite case': the

mechanics covers both cases equally well.

It should be emphasized that this works because the Bernoulli process was defined this way: the sigma algebra

consists of the union of all finite-length (but unbounded!) cylinder sets. Infinite-length strings are explicitly excluded

from the construction. Thus, letting be the set of all cylidner sets of length n (and is thus a sigma algebra in and

of itself), the sigma algebra describing the Bernoulli process is given by

where this sigma algebra is the middle letter in the Bernoulli process triple

The difference between the above, formal definition, and the somewhat sloppy, informal idea that

is worth noting. In the formal case, each finite set is endowed with a natural topology, the discrete topology; taking

the union preserves this notion. In the informal definition, a question arises: what should the topology be? What

could it be? One has the choice of the initial topology and the final topology. The formal definition makes it clear:

it's the former, not the latter.

Binomial distribution

The law of large numbers states that, on average, the expectation value of flipping heads for any one coin flip is p.

That is, one writes

for any one given random variable out of the infinite sequence of Bernoulli trials that compose the Bernoulli

process.

One is often interested in knowing how often one will observe H in a sequence of n coin flips. This is given by

simply counting: Given n successive coin flips, that is, given the set of all possible strings of length n, the number

N(k,n) of such strings that contain k occurrences of H is given by the binomial coefficient

Bernoulli process

179

If the probability of flipping heads is given by p, then the total probability of seeing a string of length n with k heads

is

This probability is known as the Binomial distribution.

Of particular interest is the question of the value of P(k,n) for very, very long sequences of coin flips, that is, for the

limit . In this case, one may make use of Stirling's approximation to the factorial, and write

Inserting this into the expression for P(k,n), one obtains the Gaussian distribution; this is the content of the central

limit theorem, and this is the simplest example thereof.

The combination of the law of large numbers, together with the central limit theorem, leads to an interesting and

perhaps surprising result: the asymptotic equipartition property. Put informally, one notes that, yes, over many coin

flips, one will observe H exactly p fraction of the time, and that this corresponds exactly with the peak of the

Gaussian. The asymptotic equipartition property essentially states that this peak is infinitely sharp, with infinite

fall-off on either side. That is, given the set of all possible infinitely long strings of H and T occurring in the

Bernoulli process, this set is partitioned into two: those strings that occur with probability 1, and those that occur

with probability 0. This partitioning is known as the Kolmogorov 0-1 law.

The size of this set is interesting, also, and can be explicitly determined: the logarithm of it is exactly the entropy of

the Bernoulli process. Once again, consider the set of all strings of length n. The size of this set is . Of these,

only a certain subset are likely; the size of this set is for . By using Stirling's approximation, putting it

into the expression for P(k,n), solving for the location and width of the peak, and finally taking one finds

that

This value is the Bernoulli entropy entropy of a Bernoulli process. Here, H stands for entropy; do not confuse it with

the same symbol H standing for heads.

von Neumann posed a curious question about the Bernoulli process: is it ever possible that a given process is

isomorphic to another, in the sense of the isomorphism of dynamical systems? The question long defied analysis, but

was finally and completely answered with the Ornstein isomorphism theorem. This breakthrough resulted in the

understanding that the Bernoulli process is unique and universal; in a certain sense, it is the single most random

process possible; nothing is 'more' random than the Bernoulli process (although one must be careful with this

informal statement; certainly, systems that are mixing are, in a certain sense, 'stronger' than the Bernoulli process,

which is merely ergodic but not mixing. However, such processes do not consist of independent random variables:

indeed, many purely deterministic, non-random systems can be mixing).

Bernoulli process

180

As a metric space

Given any two infinite binary sequences and , one can define

a metric, and, in fact, an ultrametric by considering the first location where these two strings differ. That is, let

One then defines the distance between x and y as

This metric is known as the k-adic metric (for k=2).

[2]

With it, the Bernoulli process becomes a compact metric

space.

[1]

The metric topology induced by this metric results in exactly the same Borel sigma algebra as that

constructed from the cylinder sets; this is essentially because the open balls induced by the metric are complements

of the cylinder sets (the only points in are the infinite strings).

As a dynamical system

The Bernoulli process can also be understood to be a dynamical system, specifically, a measure-preserving

dynamical system. This arises because there is a natural translation symmetry on the (two-sided) product space

given by the shift operator

The measure is translation-invariant; that is, given any cylinder set , one has

and thus the Bernoulli measure is a Haar measure.

The shift operator should be understood to be an operator acting on the sigma algebra , so that one has

In this guise, the shift operator is known as the transfer operator or the Ruelle-Frobenius-Perron operator. It is

interesting to consider the eigenfunctions of this operator, and how they differ when restricted to different subspaces

of . When restricted to the standard topology of the real numbers, the eigenfunctions are curiously the

Bernoulli polynomials!

[3][4]

This coincidence of naming was presumably not known to Bernoulli.

The coin flips of the Bernoulli process are presumed to be independent, and perfectly uncorrelated. It is reasonable to

ask what might happen if they were correlated, but still time-invariant. In this case, one gets a specific kind of

Markov chain, known as the one-dimensional Ising model.

As the Cantor space

The space is equivalent to the Cantor set, and, in formal discussions, it is often called the Cantor space.

Elements of the Cantor set are the infinitely long strings of H, T. The above discussion shows that the Bernoulli

process is one particular kind of measure on the Cantor space, although there are many others.

The Cantor space is universal in many ways; one particular way in which this holds is that the real numbers,

specifically, the unit interval [0,1] can be embedded in the Cantor set. One does this by interpreting coin flips H and

T as 0 and 1, and then takes an infinite sequence of these as a binary number. That is, given an infinite sequence

of binary digits, one considers

This function is onto but not one-to-one; every dyadic rational has two possible representations,

one ending with all zero's and one ending with all one's. As real numbers, these are the same; this is commonly

known as the theorem that 0.999...=1.000....

The shift operator composed with this map gives the Bernoulli map. That is, one has

Bernoulli process

181

where denotes the floor of 2y.

In order to study this map properly, one should, again, consider not infinite sequences of coin-tosses, but rather, the

finite sequences that lead to the product topology of the Bernoulli process. In this case, one finds that the Bernoulli

map is ergodic, but not strong mixing.

The analogous construction for the two-sided Bernoulli process results in the Baker's map. Thus, the Bernoulli

process is an Axiom A system.

Bernoulli sequence

The term Bernoulli sequence is often used informally to refer to a realization of a Bernoulli process. However, the

term has an entirely different formal definition as given below.

Suppose a Bernoulli process formally defined as a single random variable (see preceding section). For every infinite

sequence x of coin flips, there is a sequence of integers

called the Bernoulli sequence associated with the Bernoulli process. For example, if x represents a sequence of coin

flips, then the associated Bernoulli sequence is the list of natural numbers or time-points for which the coin toss

outcome is heads.

So defined, a Bernoulli sequence is also a random subset of the index set, the natural numbers .

Almost all Bernoulli sequences are ergodic sequences.

Randomness extraction

From any Bernoulli process one may derive a Bernoulli process with p=1/2 by the von Neumann extractor, the

earliest randomness extractor, which actually extracts uniform randomness.

Represent the observed process as a sequence of zeroes and ones, or bits, and group that input stream in

non-overlapping pairs of successive bits, such as (11)(00)(10)... . Then for each pair,

if the bits are equal, discard;

if the bits are not equal, output the first bit.

This table summarizes the computation.

input output

00 discard

01 0

10 1

11 discard

In the output stream 0 and 1 are equally likely, as 10 and 01 are equally likely in the original, both having probability

pq=qp. This extraction of uniform randomness does not require the input trials to be independent, only

uncorrelated. More generally, it works for any exchangeable sequence of bits: all sequences that are finite

rearrangements are equally likely.

The Von Neumann extractor uses two input bits to produce either zero or one output bits, so the output is shorter

than the input by a factor of at least2. On average the computation discards proportion p

2

+(1p)

2

of the input

pairs, or proportion p

2

+q

2

, which is near one when p is near zero or one.

Bernoulli process

182

The discard of input pairs is at least proportion 1/2, the minimum which occurs where p=1/2 for the original

process. In that case the output stream is 1/4 the length of the input on average.

References

[1] Achim Klenke, Probability Theory, (2006) Springer-Verlag ISBN 978-1-848000-047-6 doi:10.1007/978-1-848000-048-3

[2] Note: this metric is also frequently called the p-adic metric, with p standing for prime number. In order to avoid confusion with p the

probability, it is safe to call this k-adic, and this is frequently done.

[3] Pierre Gaspard, "r-adic one-dimensional maps and the Euler summation formula", Journal of Physics A, 25 (letter) L483-L485 (1992).

[4] [4] Dean J. Driebe, Fully Chaotic Maps and Broken Time Symmetry, (1999) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Netherlands ISBN

0-7923-5564-4

Further reading

Carl W. Helstrom, Probability and Stochastic Processes for Engineers, (1984) Macmillan Publishing Company,

New York ISBN 0-02-353560-1.

Dimitri P. Bertsekas and John N. Tsitsiklis, Introduction to Probability, (2002) Athena Scientific, Massachusetts

ISBN 1-886529-40-X

External links

Using a binary tree diagram for describing a Bernoulli process (http:/ / www. r-statistics. com/ 2011/ 11/

diagram-for-a-bernoulli-process-using-r/ )

Bernoulli trial

In the theory of probability and statistics, a Bernoulli trial is an experiment whose outcome is random and can be

either of two possible outcomes, "success" and "failure". The mathematical formalization of the Bernoulli trial is

known as the Bernoulli process. This article offers an elementary introduction to the concept, whereas the article on

the Bernoulli process offers a more advanced treatment.

In practice it refers to a single experiment which can have one of two possible outcomes. These events can be

phrased into "yes or no" questions:

Did the coin land heads?

Was the newborn child a girl?

Therefore success and failure are labels for outcomes, and should not be construed literally. The term "success" in

this sense consists in the result meeting specified conditions, not in any moral judgement. Examples of Bernoulli

trials include

Flipping a coin. In this context, obverse ("heads") conventionally denotes success and reverse ("tails") denotes

failure. A fair coin has the probability of success 0.5 by definition.

Rolling a die, where a six is "success" and everything else a "failure".

In conducting a political opinion poll, choosing a voter at random to ascertain whether that voter will vote "yes"

in an upcoming referendum.

Bernoulli trial

183

Definition

Independent repeated trials of an experiment with two outcomes only are called Bernoulli trials. Call one of the

outcomes "success" and the other outcome "failure". Let be the probability of success in a Bernoulli trial. Then

the probability of failure is given by

.

Random variables describing Bernoulli trials are often encoded using the convention that 1 = "success", 0 =

"failure".

Closely related to a Bernoulli trial is a binomial experiment, which consists of a fixed number of statistically

independent Bernoulli trials, each with a probability of success , and counts the number of successes. A random

variable corresponding to a binomial is denoted by , and is said to have a binomial distribution. The

probability of exactly successes in the experiment is given by:

.

Bernoulli trials may also lead to negative binomial distributions (which count the number of successes in a series of

repeated Bernoulli trials until a specified number of failures are seen), as well as various other distributions.

When multiple Bernoulli trials are performed, each with its own probability of success, these are sometimes referred

to as Poisson trials.

[1]

Example: Tossing Coins

Consider the simple experiment where a fair coin is tossed four times. Find the probability that exactly two of the

tosses result in heads.

Solution

For this experiment, let a heads be defined as a success and a tails as a failure. Because the coin is assumed to be

fair, the probability of success is . Thus the probability of failure, , is given by

.

Using the equation above, the probability of exactly two tosses out of four total tosses resulting in a heads is given

by:

.

Bernoulli trial

184

Notes

[1] Rajeev Motwani and P. Raghavan. Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, New York (NY), 1995, p.67-68

External links

Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "Bernoulli trials" (http:/ / www. encyclopediaofmath. org/ index. php?title=p/

b015690), Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN978-1-55608-010-4

Weisstein, Eric W., " Bernoulli Trial (http:/ / mathworld. wolfram. com/ BernoulliTrial. html)" from MathWorld.

Bernoulli's principle

A flow of air into a venturi meter. The kinetic

energy increases at the expense of the fluid

pressure, as shown by the difference in height of

the two columns of water.

In fluid dynamics, Bernoulli's principle states that for an inviscid

flow, an increase in the speed of the fluid occurs simultaneously with a

decrease in pressure or a decrease in the fluid's potential energy.

[1][2]

Bernoulli's principle is named after the Swiss scientist Daniel Bernoulli

who published his principle in his book Hydrodynamica in 1738.

[3]

Bernoulli's principle can be applied to various types of fluid flow,

resulting in what is loosely denoted as Bernoulli's equation. In fact,

there are different forms of the Bernoulli equation for different types of

flow. The simple form of Bernoulli's principle is valid for

incompressible flows (e.g. most liquid flows) and also for compressible

flows (e.g. gases) moving at low Mach numbers. More advanced forms

may in some cases be applied to compressible flows at higher Mach

numbers (see the derivations of the Bernoulli equation).

Bernoulli's principle can be derived from the principle of conservation

of energy. This states that, in a steady flow, the sum of all forms of mechanical energy in a fluid along a streamline is

the same at all points on that streamline. This requires that the sum of kinetic energy and potential energy remain

constant. Thus an increase in the speed of the fluid occurs proportionately with an increase in both its dynamic

pressure and kinetic energy, and a decrease in its static pressure and potential energy. If the fluid is flowing out of a

reservoir, the sum of all forms of energy is the same on all streamlines because in a reservoir the energy per unit

volume (the sum of pressure and gravitational potential gh) is the same everywhere.

[4]

Bernoulli's principle can also be derived directly from Newton's 2nd law. If a small volume of fluid is flowing

horizontally from a region of high pressure to a region of low pressure, then there is more pressure behind than in

front. This gives a net force on the volume, accelerating it along the streamline.

[5][6][7]

Fluid particles are subject only to pressure and their own weight. If a fluid is flowing horizontally and along a section

of a streamline, where the speed increases it can only be because the fluid on that section has moved from a region of

higher pressure to a region of lower pressure; and if its speed decreases, it can only be because it has moved from a

region of lower pressure to a region of higher pressure. Consequently, within a fluid flowing horizontally, the highest

speed occurs where the pressure is lowest, and the lowest speed occurs where the pressure is highest.

Bernoulli's principle

185

Incompressible flow equation

In most flows of liquids, and of gases at low Mach number, the density of a fluid parcel can be considered to be

constant, regardless of pressure variations in the flow. Therefore, the fluid can be considered to be incompressible

and these flows are called incompressible flow. Bernoulli performed his experiments on liquids, so his equation in its

original form is valid only for incompressible flow. A common form of Bernoulli's equation, valid at any arbitrary

point along a streamline, is:

(A)

where:

is the fluid flow speed at a point on a streamline,

is the acceleration due to gravity,

is the elevation of the point above a reference plane, with the positive z-direction pointing upward so in

the direction opposite to the gravitational acceleration,

is the pressure at the chosen point, and

is the density of the fluid at all points in the fluid.

For conservative force fields, Bernoulli's equation can be generalized as:

[8]

where is the force potential at the point considered on the streamline. E.g. for the Earth's gravity =gz.

The following two assumptions must be met for this Bernoulli equation to apply:

[8]

the flow must be incompressible even though pressure varies, the density must remain constant along a

streamline;

friction by viscous forces has to be negligible.

By multiplying with the fluid density , equation (A) can be rewritten as:

or:

where:

is dynamic pressure,

is the piezometric head or hydraulic head (the sum of the elevation z and the pressure

head)

[9][10]

and

is the total pressure (the sum of the static pressure p and dynamic pressure q).

[11]

The constant in the Bernoulli equation can be normalised. A common approach is in terms of total head or energy

head H:

The above equations suggest there is a flow speed at which pressure is zero, and at even higher speeds the pressure is

negative. Most often, gases and liquids are not capable of negative absolute pressure, or even zero pressure, so

clearly Bernoulli's equation ceases to be valid before zero pressure is reached. In liquids when the pressure

becomes too low cavitation occurs. The above equations use a linear relationship between flow speed squared and

pressure. At higher flow speeds in gases, or for sound waves in liquid, the changes in mass density become

Bernoulli's principle

186

significant so that the assumption of constant density is invalid.

Simplified form

In many applications of Bernoulli's equation, the change in the gz term along the streamline is so small compared

with the other terms it can be ignored. For example, in the case of aircraft in flight, the change in height z along a

streamline is so small the gz term can be omitted. This allows the above equation to be presented in the following

simplified form:

where p

0

is called 'total pressure', and q is 'dynamic pressure'.

[12]

Many authors refer to the pressure p as static

pressure to distinguish it from total pressure p

0

and dynamic pressure q. In Aerodynamics, L.J. Clancy writes: "To

distinguish it from the total and dynamic pressures, the actual pressure of the fluid, which is associated not with its

motion but with its state, is often referred to as the static pressure, but where the term pressure alone is used it refers

to this static pressure."

[13]

The simplified form of Bernoulli's equation can be summarized in the following memorable word equation:

static pressure + dynamic pressure = total pressure

[13]

Every point in a steadily flowing fluid, regardless of the fluid speed at that point, has its own unique static pressure p

and dynamic pressure q. Their sum p+q is defined to be the total pressure p

0

. The significance of Bernoulli's

principle can now be summarized as total pressure is constant along a streamline.

If the fluid flow is irrotational, the total pressure on every streamline is the same and Bernoulli's principle can be

summarized as total pressure is constant everywhere in the fluid flow.

[14]

It is reasonable to assume that irrotational

flow exists in any situation where a large body of fluid is flowing past a solid body. Examples are aircraft in flight,

and ships moving in open bodies of water. However, it is important to remember that Bernoulli's principle does not

apply in the boundary layer or in fluid flow through long pipes.

If the fluid flow at some point along a stream line is brought to rest, this point is called a stagnation point, and at this

point the total pressure is equal to the stagnation pressure.

Applicability of incompressible flow equation to flow of gases

Bernoulli's equation is sometimes valid for the flow of gases: provided that there is no transfer of kinetic or potential

energy from the gas flow to the compression or expansion of the gas. If both the gas pressure and volume change

simultaneously, then work will be done on or by the gas. In this case, Bernoulli's equation in its incompressible

flow form can not be assumed to be valid. However if the gas process is entirely isobaric, or isochoric, then no

work is done on or by the gas, (so the simple energy balance is not upset). According to the gas law, an isobaric or

isochoric process is ordinarily the only way to ensure constant density in a gas. Also the gas density will be

proportional to the ratio of pressure and absolute temperature, however this ratio will vary upon compression or

expansion, no matter what non-zero quantity of heat is added or removed. The only exception is if the net heat

transfer is zero, as in a complete thermodynamic cycle, or in an individual isentropic (frictionless adiabatic) process,

and even then this reversible process must be reversed, to restore the gas to the original pressure and specific

volume, and thus density. Only then is the original, unmodified Bernoulli equation applicable. In this case the

equation can be used if the flow speed of the gas is sufficiently below the speed of sound, such that the variation in

density of the gas (due to this effect) along each streamline can be ignored. Adiabatic flow at less than Mach 0.3 is

generally considered to be slow enough.

Bernoulli's principle

187

Unsteady potential flow

The Bernoulli equation for unsteady potential flow is used in the theory of ocean surface waves and acoustics.

For an irrotational flow, the flow velocity can be described as the gradient of a velocity potential . In that case,

and for a constant density , the momentum equations of the Euler equations can be integrated to:

[15]

which is a Bernoulli equation valid also for unsteadyor time dependentflows. Here /t denotes the partial

derivative of the velocity potential with respect to time t, and v=|| is the flow speed. The function f(t) depends

only on time and not on position in the fluid. As a result, the Bernoulli equation at some moment t does not only

apply along a certain streamline, but in the whole fluid domain. This is also true for the special case of a steady

irrotational flow, in which case f is a constant.

[15]

Further f(t) can be made equal to zero by incorporating it into the velocity potential using the transformation

Note that the relation of the potential to the flow velocity is unaffected by this transformation: =.

The Bernoulli equation for unsteady potential flow also appears to play a central role in Luke's variational principle,

a variational description of free-surface flows using the Lagrangian (not to be confused with Lagrangian

coordinates).

Compressible flow equation

Bernoulli developed his principle from his observations on liquids, and his equation is applicable only to

incompressible fluids, and compressible fluids up to approximately Mach number 0.3.

[16]

It is possible to use the

fundamental principles of physics to develop similar equations applicable to compressible fluids. There are

numerous equations, each tailored for a particular application, but all are analogous to Bernoulli's equation and all

rely on nothing more than the fundamental principles of physics such as Newton's laws of motion or the first law of

thermodynamics.

Compressible flow in fluid dynamics

For a compressible fluid, with a barotropic equation of state, and under the action of conservative forces,

[17]

(constant along a streamline)

where:

p is the pressure

is the density

v is the flow speed

is the potential associated with the conservative force field, often the gravitational potential

In engineering situations, elevations are generally small compared to the size of the Earth, and the time scales of

fluid flow are small enough to consider the equation of state as adiabatic. In this case, the above equation becomes

[18]

(constant along a streamline)

where, in addition to the terms listed above:

is the ratio of the specific heats of the fluid

Bernoulli's principle

188

g is the acceleration due to gravity

z is the elevation of the point above a reference plane

In many applications of compressible flow, changes in elevation are negligible compared to the other terms, so the

term gz can be omitted. A very useful form of the equation is then:

where:

p

0

is the total pressure

0

is the total density

Compressible flow in thermodynamics

Another useful form of the equation, suitable for use in thermodynamics and for (quasi) steady flow, is:

[2][19]

[20]

Here w is the enthalpy per unit mass, which is also often written as h (not to be confused with "head" or "height").

Note that where is the thermodynamic energy per unit mass, also known as the specific internal

energy.

The constant on the right hand side is often called the Bernoulli constant and denoted b. For steady inviscid adiabatic

flow with no additional sources or sinks of energy, b is constant along any given streamline. More generally, when b

may vary along streamlines, it still proves a useful parameter, related to the "head" of the fluid (see below).

When the change in can be ignored, a very useful form of this equation is:

where w

0

is total enthalpy. For a calorically perfect gas such as an ideal gas, the enthalpy is directly proportional to

the temperature, and this leads to the concept of the total (or stagnation) temperature.

When shock waves are present, in a reference frame in which the shock is stationary and the flow is steady, many of

the parameters in the Bernoulli equation suffer abrupt changes in passing through the shock. The Bernoulli parameter

itself, however, remains unaffected. An exception to this rule is radiative shocks, which violate the assumptions

leading to the Bernoulli equation, namely the lack of additional sinks or sources of energy.

Derivations of Bernoulli equation

Bernoulli equation for incompressible fluids

The Bernoulli equation for incompressible fluids can be derived by integrating the Euler equations, or applying the

law of conservation of energy in two sections along a streamline, ignoring viscosity, compressibility, and thermal

effects.

The simplest derivation is to first ignore gravity and consider constrictions and expansions in pipes that are otherwise

straight, as seen in Venturi effect. Let the x axis be directed down the axis of the pipe.

Define a parcel of fluid moving through a pipe with cross-sectional area "A", the length of the parcel is "dx", and the

volume of the parcel Adx. If mass density is , the mass of the parcel is density multiplied by its volume m=Adx.

The change in pressure over distance dx is "dp" and flow velocity v=dx/dt.

Apply Newton's Second Law of Motion Force =massacceleration and recognizing that the effective force on the

parcel of fluid is -Adp. If the pressure decreases along the length of the pipe, dp is negative but the force resulting in

Bernoulli's principle

189

flow is positive along the x axis.

In steady flow the velocity field is constant with respect to time, v=v(x)=v(x(t)), so v itself is not directly a function

of time t. It is only when the parcel moves through x that the cross sectional area changes: v depends on t only

through the cross-sectional position x(t).

With density constant, the equation of motion can be written as

by integrating with respect to x

where C is a constant, sometimes referred to as the Bernoulli constant. It is not a universal constant, but rather a

constant of a particular fluid system. The deduction is: where the speed is large, pressure is low and vice versa.

In the above derivation, no external work-energy principle is invoked. Rather, Bernoulli's principle was inherently

derived by a simple manipulation of the momentum equation.

A streamtube of fluid moving to the right. Indicated are pressure, elevation, flow speed, distance (s), and cross-sectional area. Note that in this figure

elevation is denoted as h, contrary to the text where it is given by z.

Another way to derive Bernoulli's principle for an incompressible flow is by applying conservation of energy.

[21]

In

the form of the work-energy theorem, stating that

[22]

the change in the kinetic energy E

kin

of the system equals the net work W done on the system;

Therefore,

Bernoulli's principle

190

the work done by the forces in the fluid = increase in kinetic energy.

The system consists of the volume of fluid, initially between the cross-sections A

1

and A

2

. In the time interval t

fluid elements initially at the inflow cross-section A

1

move over a distance s

1

=v

1

t, while at the outflow

cross-section the fluid moves away from cross-section A

2

over a distance s

2

=v

2

t. The displaced fluid volumes at

the inflow and outflow are respectively A

1

s

1

and A

2

s

2

. The associated displaced fluid masses are when is the

fluid's mass density equal to density times volume, so A

1

s

1

and A

2

s

2

. By mass conservation, these two masses

displaced in the time interval t have to be equal, and this displaced mass is denoted bym:

The work done by the forces consists of two parts:

The work done by the pressure acting on the areas A

1

and A

2

The work done by gravity: the gravitational potential energy in the volume A

1

s

1

is lost, and at the outflow in the

volume A

2

s

2

is gained. So, the change in gravitational potential energy E

pot,gravity

in the time interval t is

Now, the work by the force of gravity is opposite to the change in potential energy, W

gravity

=E

pot,gravity

:

while the force of gravity is in the negative z-direction, the workgravity force times change in

elevationwill be negative for a positive elevation change z=z

2

z

1

, while the corresponding potential

energy change is positive.

[23]

So:

And the total work done in this time interval is

The increase in kinetic energy is

Putting these together, the work-kinetic energy theorem W=E

kin

gives:

[21]

or

After dividing by the mass m=A

1

v

1

t=A

2

v

2

t the result is:

[21]

or, as stated in the first paragraph:

(Eqn. 1), Which is also Equation (A)

Further division by g produces the following equation. Note that each term can be described in the length dimension

(such as meters). This is the head equation derived from Bernoulli's principle:

(Eqn. 2a)

Bernoulli's principle

191

The middle term, z, represents the potential energy of the fluid due to its elevation with respect to a reference plane.

Now, z is called the elevation head and given the designation z

elevation

.

A free falling mass from an elevation z>0 (in a vacuum) will reach a speed

when arriving at elevation z=0. Or when we rearrange it as a head:

The term v

2

/(2g) is called the velocity head, expressed as a length measurement. It represents the internal energy of

the fluid due to its motion.

The hydrostatic pressure p is defined as

, with p

0

some reference pressure, or when we rearrange it as a head:

The term p/(g) is also called the pressure head, expressed as a length measurement. It represents the internal

energy of the fluid due to the pressure exerted on the container.

When we combine the head due to the flow speed and the head due to static pressure with the elevation above a

reference plane, we obtain a simple relationship useful for incompressible fluids using the velocity head, elevation

head, and pressure head.

(Eqn. 2b)

If we were to multiply Eqn. 1 by the density of the fluid, we would get an equation with three pressure terms:

(Eqn. 3)

We note that the pressure of the system is constant in this form of the Bernoulli Equation. If the static pressure of the

system (the far right term) increases, and if the pressure due to elevation (the middle term) is constant, then we know

that the dynamic pressure (the left term) must have decreased. In other words, if the speed of a fluid decreases and it

is not due to an elevation difference, we know it must be due to an increase in the static pressure that is resisting the

flow.

All three equations are merely simplified versions of an energy balance on a system.

Bernoulli equation for compressible fluids

The derivation for compressible fluids is similar. Again, the derivation depends upon (1) conservation of mass, and (2) conservation of energy.

Conservation of mass implies that in the above figure, in the interval of time t, the amount of mass passing through the boundary defined by the

area A

1

is equal to the amount of mass passing outwards through the boundary defined by the area A

2

:

.

Conservation of energy is applied in a similar manner: It is assumed that the change in energy of the volume of the streamtube bounded by A

1

and

A

2

is due entirely to energy entering or leaving through one or the other of these two boundaries. Clearly, in a more complicated situation such as a

fluid flow coupled with radiation, such conditions are not met. Nevertheless, assuming this to be the case and assuming the flow is steady so that the

net change in the energy is zero,

where E

1

and E

2

are the energy entering through A

1

and leaving through A

2

, respectively.

Bernoulli's principle

192

The energy entering through A

1

is the sum of the kinetic energy entering, the energy entering in the form of potential gravitational energy of the

fluid, the fluid thermodynamic energy entering, and the energy entering in the form of mechanical pdV work:

where =gz is a force potential due to the Earth's gravity, g is acceleration due to gravity, and z is elevation above a reference plane.

A similar expression for may easily be constructed. So now setting :

which can be rewritten as:

Now, using the previously-obtained result from conservation of mass, this may be simplified to obtain

which is the Bernoulli equation for compressible flow.

Applications

Condensation visible over the upper surface of a

wing caused by the fall in temperature

accompanying the fall in pressure, both due to

acceleration of the air.

In modern everyday life there are many observations that can be

successfully explained by application of Bernoulli's principle, even

though no real fluid is entirely inviscid

[24]

and a small viscosity often

has a large effect on the flow.

Bernoulli's principle can be used to calculate the lift force on an

airfoil if the behaviour of the fluid flow in the vicinity of the foil is

known. For example, if the air flowing past the top surface of an

aircraft wing is moving faster than the air flowing past the bottom

surface, then Bernoulli's principle implies that the pressure on the

surfaces of the wing will be lower above than below. This pressure

difference results in an upwards lifting force.

[25][26]

Whenever the

distribution of speed past the top and bottom surfaces of a wing is

known, the lift forces can be calculated (to a good approximation)

using Bernoulli's equations

[27]

established by Bernoulli over a century before the first man-made wings were

used for the purpose of flight. Bernoulli's principle does not explain why the air flows faster past the top of the

wing and slower past the underside. To understand why, it is helpful to understand circulation, the Kutta

condition, and the KuttaJoukowski theorem.

The Dyson Bladeless Fan (or Air Multiplier) is an implementation that takes advantage of the Venturi effect,

Coand effect and Bernoulli's Principle.

[28]

The carburetor used in many reciprocating engines contains a venturi to create a region of low pressure to draw

fuel into the carburetor and mix it thoroughly with the incoming air. The low pressure in the throat of a venturi

can be explained by Bernoulli's principle; in the narrow throat, the air is moving at its fastest speed and therefore

it is at its lowest pressure.

The Pitot tube and static port on an aircraft are used to determine the airspeed of the aircraft. These two devices

are connected to the airspeed indicator, which determines the dynamic pressure of the airflow past the aircraft.

Dynamic pressure is the difference between stagnation pressure and static pressure. Bernoulli's principle is used to

calibrate the airspeed indicator so that it displays the indicated airspeed appropriate to the dynamic pressure.

[29]

The flow speed of a fluid can be measured using a device such as a Venturi meter or an orifice plate, which can be

placed into a pipeline to reduce the diameter of the flow. For a horizontal device, the continuity equation shows

Bernoulli's principle

193

that for an incompressible fluid, the reduction in diameter will cause an increase in the fluid flow speed.

Subsequently Bernoulli's principle then shows that there must be a decrease in the pressure in the reduced

diameter region. This phenomenon is known as the Venturi effect.

The maximum possible drain rate for a tank with a hole or tap at the base can be calculated directly from

Bernoulli's equation, and is found to be proportional to the square root of the height of the fluid in the tank. This is

Torricelli's law, showing that Torricelli's law is compatible with Bernoulli's principle. Viscosity lowers this drain

rate. This is reflected in the discharge coefficient, which is a function of the Reynolds number and the shape of

the orifice.

[30]

In open-channel hydraulics, a detailed analysis of the Bernoulli theorem and its extension were recently (2009)

developed.

[31]

It was proved that the depth-averaged specific energy reaches a minimum in converging

accelerating free-surface flow over weirs and flumes (also

[32][33]

). Further, in general, a channel control with

minimum specific energy in curvilinear flow is not isolated from water waves, as customary state in open-channel

hydraulics.

The Bernoulli grip relies on this principle to create a non-contact adhesive force between a surface and the

gripper.

Misunderstandings about the generation of lift

Many explanations for the generation of lift (on airfoils, propeller blades, etc.) can be found; some of these

explanations can be misleading, and some are false.

[34]

This has been a source of heated discussion over the years. In

particular, there has been debate about whether lift is best explained by Bernoulli's principle or Newton's laws of

motion. Modern writings agree that both Bernoulli's principle and Newton's laws are relevant and either can be used

to correctly describe lift.

[35][36][37]

Several of these explanations use the Bernoulli principle to connect the flow kinematics to the flow-induced

pressures. In cases of incorrect (or partially correct) explanations relying on the Bernoulli principle, the errors

generally occur in the assumptions on the flow kinematics and how these are produced. It is not the Bernoulli

principle itself that is questioned because this principle is well established.

[38][39][40][41]

Misapplications of Bernoulli's principle in common classroom demonstrations

There are several common classroom demonstrations that are sometimes incorrectly explained using Bernoulli's

principle.

[42]

One involves holding a piece of paper horizontally so that it droops downward and then blowing over

the top of it. As the demonstrator blows over the paper, the paper rises. It is then asserted that this is because "faster

moving air has lower pressure".

[43][44][45]

One problem with this explanation can be seen by blowing along the bottom of the paper - were the deflection due

simply to faster moving air one would expect the paper to deflect downward, but the paper deflects upward

regardless of whether the faster moving air is on the top or the bottom.

[46]

Another problem is that when the air

leaves the demonstrator's mouth it has the same pressure as the surrounding air;

[47]

the air does not have lower

pressure just because it is moving; in the demonstration, the static pressure of the air leaving the demonstrator's

mouth is equal to the pressure of the surrounding air.

[48][49]

A third problem is that it is false to make a connection

between the flow on the two sides of the paper using Bernoullis equation since the air above and below are different

flow fields and Bernoulli's principle only applies within a flow field.

[50][51][52][53]

As the wording of the principle can change its implications, stating the principle correctly is important.

[54]

What

Bernoulli's principle actually says is that within a flow of constant energy, when fluid flows through a region of

lower pressure it speeds up and vice versa.

[55]

Thus, Bernoulli's principle concerns itself with changes in speed and

changes in pressure within a flow field. It cannot be used to compare different flow fields.

Bernoulli's principle

194

A correct explanation of why the paper rises would observe that the plume follows the curve of the paper and that a

curved streamline will develop a pressure gradient perpendicular to the direction of flow, with the lower pressure on

the inside of the curve.

[56][57][58][59]

Bernoulli's principle predicts that the decrease in pressure is associated with an

increase in speed, i.e. that as the air passes over the paper it speeds up and moves faster than it was moving when it

left the demonstrator's mouth. But this is not apparent from the demonstration.

[60][61][62]

Other common classroom demonstrations, such as blowing between two suspended spheres, or suspending a ball in

an airstream are sometimes explained in a similarly misleading manner by saying "faster moving air has lower

pressure".

[63][64][65][66][67][68][69]

References

[1] Clancy, L.J., Aerodynamics, Chapter 3.

[2] Batchelor, G.K. (1967), Section 3.5, pp.15664.

[3] "Hydrodynamica" (http:/ / www. britannica. com/ EBchecked/ topic/ 658890/ Hydrodynamica#tab=active~checked,items~checked&

title=Hydrodynamica Britannica Online Encyclopedia). Britannica Online Encyclopedia. . Retrieved 2008-10-30.

[4] Streeter, V.L., Fluid Mechanics, Example3.5, McGrawHill Inc. (1966), New York.

[5] "If the particle is in a region of varying pressure (a non-vanishing pressure gradient in the x-direction) and if the particle has a finite size l,

then the front of the particle will be seeing a different pressure from the rear. More precisely, if the pressure drops in the x-direction (dp/dx <

0) the pressure at the rear is higher than at the front and the particle experiences a (positive) net force. According to Newtons second law, this

force causes an acceleration and the particles velocity increases as it moves along the streamline... Bernoullis equation describes this

mathematically (see the complete derivation in the appendix)."Babinsky, Holger (November 2003), "How do wings work?" (http:/ / www. iop.

org/ EJ/ article/ 0031-9120/ 38/ 6/ 001/ pe3_6_001. pdf), Physics Education,

[6] "Acceleration of air is caused by pressure gradients. Air is accelerated in direction of the velocity if the pressure goes down. Thus the

decrease of pressure is the cause of a higher velocity." Weltner, Klaus; Ingelman-Sundberg, Martin, Misinterpretations of Bernoulli's Law

(http:/ / user.uni-frankfurt.de/ ~weltner/ Mis6/ mis6. html),

[7] " The idea is that as the parcel moves along, following a streamline, as it moves into an area of higher pressure there will be higher pressure

ahead (higher than the pressure behind) and this will exert a force on the parcel, slowing it down. Conversely if the parcel is moving into a

region of lower pressure, there will be an higher pressure behind it (higher than the pressure ahead), speeding it up. As always, any unbalanced

force will cause a change in momentum (and velocity), as required by Newtons laws of motion." See How It Flies John S. Denker http:/ /

www.av8n. com/ how/ htm/ airfoils.html

[8] [8] Batchelor, G.K. (1967), 5.1, p. 265.

[9] Mulley, Raymond (2004). Flow of Industrial Fluids: Theory and Equations. CRC Press. ISBN0-8493-2767-9., 410 pages. See pp. 4344.

[10] Chanson, Hubert (2004). Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow: An Introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN0-7506-5978-5., 650 pages.

See p. 22.

[11] Oertel, Herbert; Prandtl, Ludwig; Bhle, M.; Mayes, Katherine (2004). Prandtl's Essentials of Fluid Mechanics. Springer. pp.7071.

ISBN0-387-40437-6.

[12] "Bernoulli's Equation" (http:/ / www.grc.nasa. gov/ WWW/ K-12/ airplane/ bern. htm). NASA Glenn Research Center. . Retrieved

2009-03-04.

[13] Clancy, L.J., Aerodynamics, Section 3.5.

[14] Clancy, L.J. Aerodynamics, Equation 3.12

[15] [15] Batchelor, G.K. (1967), p. 383

[16] White, Frank M. Fluid Mechanics, 6e. McGraw-Hill International Edition. p. 602.

[17] Clarke C. and Carswell B., Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics

[18] Clancy, L.J., Aerodynamics, Section3.11

[19] Landau & Lifshitz (1987, 5)

[20] Van Wylen, G.J., and Sonntag, R.E., (1965), Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics, Section5.9, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York

[21] Feynman, R.P.; Leighton, R.B.; Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. ISBN0-201-02116-1., Vol. 2, 403, pp. 406

409.

[22] Tipler, Paul (1991). Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Mechanics (3rd extended ed.). W. H. Freeman. ISBN0-87901-432-6., p. 138.

[23] Feynman, R.P.; Leighton, R.B.; Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. ISBN0-201-02116-1., Vol. 1, 143, p. 144.

[24] Physics Today, May 1010, "The Nearly Perfect Fermi Gas", by John E. Thomas, p 34.

[25] Clancy, L.J., Aerodynamics, Section5.5 ("When a stream of air flows past an airfoil, there are local changes in flow speed round the airfoil,

and consequently changes in static pressure, in accordance with Bernoulli's Theorem. The distribution of pressure determines the lift, pitching

moment and form drag of the airfoil, and the position of its centre of pressure.")

[26] Resnick, R. and Halliday, D. (1960), Physics, Section185, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York ("[streamlines] are closer together above

the wing than they are below so that Bernoulli's principle predicts the observed upward dynamic lift.")

Bernoulli's principle

195

[27] Eastlake, Charles N. (March 2002). "An Aerodynamicists View of Lift, Bernoulli, and Newton" (http:/ / www. df. uba. ar/ users/ sgil/

physics_paper_doc/ papers_phys/ fluids/ Bernoulli_Newton_lift. pdf). The Physics Teacher 40. . "The resultant force is determined by

integrating the surface-pressure distribution over the surface area of the airfoil."

[28] Hua, M., Khaitan, D. and Kintner, P. (2011). University of Rochester, NY. Studying Near-Surface Effects of the Dyson Air-Multiplier

Airfoil (http:/ / www. me. rochester.edu/ courses/ ME241/ G12Dyson. pdf) (2.7MB file) Retrieved 2012-07-19

[29] Clancy, L.J., Aerodynamics, Section3.8

[30] Mechanical Engineering Reference Manual Ninth Edition

[31] Castro-Orgaz, O. & Chanson, H. (2009). "Bernoulli Theorem, Minimum Specific Energy and Water Wave Celerity in Open Channel Flow"

(http:/ / espace. library. uq. edu. au/ view/ UQ:187794). Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 135 (6): 773778.

doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000084. .

[32] Chanson, H. (2009). "Transcritical Flow due to Channel Contraction" (http:/ / espace. library. uq. edu. au/ view/ UQ:187795). Journal of

Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE 135 (12): 11131114. .

[33] Chanson, H. (2006). "Minimum Specific Energy and Critical Flow Conditions in Open Channels" (http:/ / espace. library. uq. edu. au/ view.

php?pid=UQ:7830). Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 132 (5): 498502.

doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:5(498). .

[34] Glenn Research Center (2006-03-15). "Incorrect Lift Theory" (http:/ / www. grc. nasa. gov/ WWW/ K-12/ airplane/ wrong1. html). NASA. .

Retrieved 2010-08-12.

[35] Chanson, H. (2009). Applied Hydrodynamics: An Introduction to Ideal and Real Fluid Flows (http:/ / www. uq. edu. au/ ~e2hchans/

reprints/ book15. htm). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Leiden, The Netherlands, 478 pages. ISBN978-0-415-49271-3. .

[36] "Newton vs Bernoulli" (http:/ / www. grc.nasa.gov/ WWW/ K-12/ airplane/ bernnew. html). .

[37] Ison, David. Bernoulli Or Newton: Who's Right About Lift? (http:/ / www. planeandpilotmag. com/ component/ zine/ article/ 289. html)

Retrieved on 2009-11-26

[38] Phillips, O.M. (1977). The dynamics of the upper ocean (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-29801-6. Section 2.4.

[39] [39] Batchelor, G.K. (1967). Sections3.5 and5.1

[40] Lamb, H. (1994) 1729

[41] Weltner, Klaus; Ingelman-Sundberg, Martin. "Physics of Flight reviewed" (http:/ / www. angelfire. com/ dc/ nova/ flight/ PHYSIC4.

html). . "The conventional explanation of aerodynamical lift based on Bernoullis law and velocity differences mixes up cause and effect. The

faster flow at the upper side of the wing is the consequence of low pressure and not its cause."

[42] "Bernoulli's law and experiments attributed to it are fascinating. Unfortunately some of these experiments are explained erroneously..."

Misinterpretations of Bernoulli's Law Weltner, Klaus and Ingelman-Sundberg, Martin Department of Physics, University Frankfurt http:/ /

www-stud. rbi. informatik.uni-frankfurt. de/ ~plass/ MIS/ mis6. html

[43] "This occurs because of Bernoullis principle fast-moving air has lower pressure than non-moving air." Make Magazine http:/ /

makeprojects.com/ Project/ Origami-Flying-Disk/ 327/ 1

[44] " Faster-moving fluid, lower pressure. ... When the demonstrator holds the paper in front of his mouth and blows across the top, he is

creating an area of faster-moving air." University of Minnesota School of Physics and Astronomy http:/ / www. physics. umn. edu/ outreach/

pforce/ circus/ Bernoulli.html

[45] "Bernoulli's Principle states that faster moving air has lower pressure... You can demonstrate Bernoulli's Principle by blowing over a piece

of paper held horizontally across your lips." http:/ / www. tallshipschannelislands. com/ PDFs/ Educational_Packet. pdf

[46] "If the lift in figure A were caused by "Bernoulli principle," then the paper in figure B should droop further when air is blown beneath it.

However, as shown, it raises when the upward pressure gradient in downward-curving flow adds to atmospheric pressure at the paper lower

surface." Gale M. Craig PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF WINGED FLIGHT http:/ / www. regenpress. com/ aerodynamics. pdf

[47] "In fact, the pressure in the air blown out of the lungs is equal to that of the surrounding air..." Babinsky http:/ / iopscience. iop. org/

0031-9120/ 38/ 6/ 001/ pdf/ pe3_6_001. pdf

[48] "...air does not have a reduced lateral pressure (or static pressure...) simply because it is caused to move, the static pressure of free air does

not decrease as the speed of the air increases, it misunderstanding Bernoulli's principle to suggest that this is what it tells us, and the behavior

of the curved paper is explained by other reasoning than Bernoulli's principle." Peter Eastwell Bernoulli? Perhaps, but What About Viscosity?

The Science Education Review, 6(1) 2007 http:/ / www. scienceeducationreview. com/ open_access/ eastwell-bernoulli. pdf

[49] "Make a strip of writing paper about 5 cm X 25 cm. Hold it in front of your lips so that it hangs out and down making a convex upward

surface. When you blow across the top of the paper, it rises. Many books attribute this to the lowering of the air pressure on top solely to the

Bernoulli effect. Now use your fingers to form the paper into a curve that it is slightly concave upward along its whole length and again blow

along the top of this strip. The paper now bends downward...an often-cited experiment, which is usually taken as demonstrating the common

explanation of lift, does not do so..." Jef Raskin Coanda Effect: Understanding Why Wings Work http:/ / karmak. org/ archive/ 2003/ 02/

coanda_effect. html

[50] "Blowing over a piece of paper does not demonstrate Bernoullis equation. While it is true that a curved paper lifts when flow is applied on

one side, this is not because air is moving at different speeds on the two sides... It is false to make a connection between the flow on the two

sides of the paper using Bernoullis equation." Holger Babinsky How Do Wings Work Physics Education 38(6) http:/ / iopscience. iop. org/

0031-9120/ 38/ 6/ 001/ pdf/ pe3_6_001. pdf

[51] "An explanation based on Bernoullis principle is not applicable to this situation, because this principle has nothing to say about the

interaction of air masses having different speeds... Also, while Bernoullis principle allows us to compare fluid speeds and pressures along a

Bernoulli's principle

196

single streamline and... along two different streamlines that originate under identical fluid conditions, using Bernoullis principle to compare

the air above and below the curved paper in Figure 1 is nonsensical; in this case, there arent any streamlines at all below the paper!" Peter

Eastwell Bernoulli? Perhaps, but What About Viscosity? The Science Education Review 6(1) 2007 http:/ / www. scienceeducationreview.

com/ open_access/ eastwell-bernoulli. pdf

[52] "The well-known demonstration of the phenomenon of lift by means of lifting a page cantilevered in ones hand by blowing horizontally

along it is probably more a demonstration of the forces inherent in the Coanda effect than a demonstration of Bernoullis law; for, here, an air

jet issues from the mouth and attaches to a curved (and, in this case pliable) surface. The upper edge is a complicated vortex-laden mixing

layer and the distant flow is quiescent, so that Bernoullis law is hardly applicable." David Auerbach Why Aircreft Fly European Journal of

Physics Vol 21 p 289 http:/ / iopscience.iop. org/ 0143-0807/ 21/ 4/ 302/ pdf/ 0143-0807_21_4_302. pdf

[53] "Millions of children in science classes are being asked to blow over curved pieces of paper and observe that the paper "lifts"... They are

then asked to believe that Bernoulli's theorem is responsible... Unfortunately, the "dynamic lift" involved...is not properly explained by

Bernoulli's theorem." Norman F. Smith "Bernoulli and Newton in Fluid Mechanics" The Physics Teacher Nov 1972

[54] "Bernoullis principle is very easy to understand provided the principle is correctly stated. However, we must be careful, because

seemingly-small changes in the wording can lead to completely wrong conclusions." See How It Flies John S. Denker http:/ / www. av8n.

com/ how/ htm/ airfoils.html#sec-bernoulli

[55] "A complete statement of Bernoulli's Theorem is as follows: "In a flow where no energy is being added or taken away, the sum of its various

energies is a constant: consequently where the velocity increasees the pressure decreases and vice versa."" Norman F Smith Bernoulli, Newton

and Dynamic Lift Part I School Science and Mathematics Vol 73 Issue 3 http:/ / onlinelibrary. wiley. com/ doi/ 10. 1111/ j. 1949-8594. 1973.

tb08998.x/ pdf

[56] "...if a streamline is curved, there must be a pressure gradient across the streamline, with the pressure increasing in the direction away from

the centre of curvature." Babinsky http:/ / iopscience.iop. org/ 0031-9120/ 38/ 6/ 001/ pdf/ pe3_6_001. pdf

[57] "The curved paper turns the stream of air downward, and this action produces the lift reaction that lifts the paper." Norman F. Smith

Bernoulli, Newton, and Dynamic Lift Part II School Science and Mathematics vol 73 Issue 4 pg 333 http:/ / onlinelibrary. wiley. com/ doi/ 10.

1111/ j.1949-8594.1973. tb09040. x/ pdf

[58] "The curved surface of the tongue creates unequal air pressure and a lifting action. ... Lift is caused by air moving over a curved surface."

AERONAUTICS An Educators Guide with Activities in Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education by NASA pg 26 http:/ / www. nasa.

gov/ pdf/ 58152main_Aeronautics.Educator.pdf

[59] "Viscosity causes the breath to follow the curved surface, Newton's first law says there a force on the air and Newtons third law says there is

an equal and opposite force on the paper. Momentum transfer lifts the strip. The reduction in pressure acting on the top surface of the piece of

paper causes the paper to rise." The Newtonian Description of Lift of a Wing-Revised David F. Anderson & Scott Eberhardt http:/ / home.

comcast. net/ ~clipper-108/ Lift_AAPT. pdf

[60] '"Demonstrations" of Bernoulli's principle are often given as demonstrations of the physics of lift. They are truly demonstrations of lift, but

certainly not of Bernoulli's principle.' David F Anderson & Scott Eberhardt Understanding Flight pg 229 http:/ / books. google. com/

books?id=52Hfn7uEGSoC& pg=PA229

[61] "As an example, take the misleading experiment most often used to "demonstrate" Bernoulli's principle. Hold a piece of piece of paper so

that it curves over your finger, then blow across the top. The paper will rise. However most people do not realize that the paper would not rise

if it were flat, even though you are blowing air across the top of it at a furious rate. Bernoulli's principle does not apply directly in this case.

This is because the air on the two sides of the paper did not start out from the same source. The air on the bottom is ambient air from the room,

but the air on the top came from your mouth where you actually increased its speed without decreasing its pressure by forcing it out of your

mouth. As a result the air on both sides of the flat paper actually has the same pressure, even though the air on the top is moving faster. The

reason that a curved piece of paper does rise is that the air from your mouth speeds up even more as it follows the curve of the paper, which in

turn lowers the pressure according to Bernoulli." From The Aeronautics File By Max Feil http:/ / webcache. googleusercontent. com/

search?q=cache:nutfrrTXLkMJ:www. mat. uc. pt/ ~pedro/ ncientificos/ artigos/ aeronauticsfile1. ps+ & cd=29& hl=en& ct=clnk& gl=us

[62] "Some people blow over a sheet of paper to demonstrate that the accelerated air over the sheet results in a lower pressure. They are wrong

with their explanation. The sheet of paper goes up because it deflects the air, by the Coanda effect, and that deflection is the cause of the force

lifting the sheet. To prove they are wrong I use the following experiment: If the sheet of paper is pre bend the other way by first rolling it, and

if you blow over it than, it goes down. This is because the air is deflected the other way. Airspeed is still higher above the sheet, so that is not

causing the lower pressure." Pim Geurts. sailtheory.com http:/ / www. sailtheory. com/ experiments. html

[63] "Finally, lets go back to the initial example of a ball levitating in a jet of air. The naive explanation for the stability of the ball in the air

stream, 'because pressure in the jet is lower than pressure in the surrounding atmosphere,' is clearly incorrect. The static pressure in the free air

jet is the same as the pressure in the surrounding atmosphere..." Martin Kamela Thinking About Bernoulli The Physics Teacher Vol. 45,

September 2007 http:/ / tpt. aapt.org/ resource/ 1/ phteah/ v45/ i6/ p379_s1

[64] "Aysmmetrical flow (not Bernoulli's theorem) also explains lift on the ping-pong ball or beach ball that floats so mysteriously in the tilted

vacuum cleaner exhaust..." Norman F. Smith, Bernoulli and Newton in Fluid Mechanics" The Physics Teacher Nov 1972 p 455

[65] "Bernoullis theorem is often obscured by demonstrations involving non-Bernoulli forces. For example, a ball may be supported on an

upward jet of air or water, because any fluid (the air and water) has viscosity, which retards the slippage of one part of the fluid moving past

another part of the fluid." The Bernoulli Conundrum Robert P. Bauman Professor of Physics Emeritus University of Alabama at Birmingham

http:/ / www.introphysics.info/ Papers/ BernoulliConundrumWS. pdf

Bernoulli's principle

197

[66] "In a demonstration sometimes wrongly described as showing lift due to pressure reduction in moving air or pressure reduction due to flow

path restriction, a ball or balloon is suspended by a jet of air." Gale M. Craig PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF WINGED FLIGHT http:/ / www.

regenpress.com/ aerodynamics. pdf

[67] "A second example is the confinement of a ping-pong ball in the vertical exhaust from a hair dryer. We are told that this is a demonstration

of Bernoulli's principle. But, we now know that the exhaust does not have a lower value of ps. Again, it is momentum transfer that keeps the

ball in the airflow. When the ball gets near the edge of the exhaust there is an asymmetric flow around the ball, which pushes it away from the

edge of the flow. The same is true when one blows between two ping-pong balls hanging on strings." Anderson & Eberhardt The Newtonian

Description of Lift on a Wing http:/ / lss. fnal. gov/ archive/ 2001/ pub/ Pub-01-036-E. pdf

[68] "This demonstration is often incorrectly explained using the Bernoulli principle. According to the INCORRECT explanation, the air flow is

faster in the region between the sheets, thus creating a lower pressure compared with the quiet air on the outside of the sheets. UNIVERSITY

OF MARYLAND PHYSICS LECTURE-DEMONSTRATION FACILITY http:/ / www. physics. umd. edu/ lecdem/ services/ demos/

demosf5/ f5-03. htm

[69] "Although the Bernoulli effect is often used to explain this demonstration, and one manufacturer sells the material for this demonstration as

"Bernoulli bags," it cannot be explained by the Bernoulli effect, but rather by the process of entrainment." UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

PHYSICS LECTURE-DEMONSTRATION FACILITY http:/ / www. physics. umd. edu/ lecdem/ outreach/ QOTW/ arch13/ a256. htm

Notes

Further reading

Batchelor, G.K. (1967). An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-66396-2.

Clancy, L.J. (1975). Aerodynamics. Pitman Publishing, London. ISBN0-273-01120-0.

Lamb, H. (1993). Hydrodynamics (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-45868-9. Originally

published in 1879; the 6th extended edition appeared first in 1932.

Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. (1987). Fluid Mechanics. Course of Theoretical Physics (2nd ed.). Pergamon Press.

ISBN0-7506-2767-0.

Chanson, H. (2009). Applied Hydrodynamics: An Introduction to Ideal and Real Fluid Flows (http:/ / www. uq.

edu. au/ ~e2hchans/ reprints/ book15. htm). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN978-0-415-49271-3.

External links

Head and Energy of Fluid Flow (http:/ / www. mathalino. com/ reviewer/ fluid-mechanics-and-hydraulics/

energy-and-head)

Interactive animation demonstrating Bernoulli's principle (http:/ / home. earthlink. net/ ~mmc1919/ venturi. html)

Denver University Bernoulli's equation and pressure measurement (http:/ / mysite. du. edu/ ~jcalvert/ tech/

fluids/ bernoul. htm)

Millersville University Applications of Euler's equation (http:/ / www. millersville. edu/ ~jdooley/ macro/

macrohyp/ eulerap/ eulap. htm)

NASA Beginner's guide to aerodynamics (http:/ / www. grc. nasa. gov/ WWW/ K-12/ airplane/ bga. html)

Misinterpretations of Bernoulli's equation Weltner and Ingelman-Sundberg (http:/ / user. uni-frankfurt. de/

~weltner/ Misinterpretations of Bernoullis Law 2011 internet. pdf)

Leonhard Euler

198

Leonhard Euler

Leonhard Euler

Portrait by Johann Georg Brucker (1756)

Born 15 April 1707

Basel, Switzerland

Died 18 September 1783 (aged76)

[OS: 7 September 1783]

Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire

Residence Kingdom of Prussia, Russian Empire

Switzerland

Nationality Swiss

Fields Mathematics and physics

Institutions Imperial Russian Academy of Sciences

Berlin Academy

Alma mater University of Basel

Doctoral advisor Johann Bernoulli

Doctoral students Nicolas Fuss

Johann Hennert

Joseph Louis Lagrange

Stepan Rumovsky

Knownfor See full list

Signature

Notes

He is the father of the mathematician Johann Euler

He is listed by academic genealogy authorities as the equivalent to the doctoral advisor of Joseph Louis Lagrange.

Leonhard Euler (German pronunciation: [l], Swiss German pronunciation, Standard German pronunciation, English

approximation, "Oiler";

[1]

15 April 1707 18 September 1783) was a pioneering Swiss mathematician and physicist.

He made important discoveries in fields as diverse as infinitesimal calculus and graph theory. He also introduced

much of the modern mathematical terminology and notation, particularly for mathematical analysis, such as the

notion of a mathematical function.

[2]

He is also renowned for his work in mechanics, fluid dynamics, optics, and

astronomy. Euler spent most of his adult life in St. Petersburg, Russia, and in Berlin, Prussia. He is considered to be

the preeminent mathematician of the 18th century, and one of the greatest mathematicians to have ever lived. He is

also one of the most prolific mathematicians ever; his collected works fill 6080 quarto volumes.

[3]

A statement

attributed to Pierre-Simon Laplace expresses Euler's influence on mathematics: "Read Euler, read Euler, he is the

Leonhard Euler

199

master of us all."

[4]

Life

Early years

Old Swiss 10 Franc banknote honoring Euler

Euler was born on April 15, 1707, in Basel to Paul Euler, a pastor of

the Reformed Church. His mother was Marguerite Brucker, a pastor's

daughter. He had two younger sisters named Anna Maria and Maria

Magdalena. Soon after the birth of Leonhard, the Eulers moved from

Basel to the town of Riehen, where Euler spent most of his childhood.

Paul Euler was a friend of the Bernoulli familyJohann Bernoulli,

who was then regarded as Europe's foremost mathematician, would

eventually be the most important influence on young Leonhard. Euler's

early formal education started in Basel, where he was sent to live with his maternal grandmother. At the age of

thirteen he enrolled at the University of Basel, and in 1723, received his Master of Philosophy with a dissertation that

compared the philosophies of Descartes and Newton. At this time, he was receiving Saturday afternoon lessons from

Johann Bernoulli, who quickly discovered his new pupil's incredible talent for mathematics.

[5]

Euler was at this point

studying theology, Greek, and Hebrew at his father's urging, in order to become a pastor, but Bernoulli convinced

Paul Euler that Leonhard was destined to become a great mathematician. In 1726, Euler completed a dissertation on

the propagation of sound with the title De Sono.

[6]

At that time, he was pursuing an (ultimately unsuccessful) attempt

to obtain a position at the University of Basel. In 1727, he entered the Paris Academy Prize Problem competition,

where the problem that year was to find the best way to place the masts on a ship. He won second place, losing only

to Pierre Bouguera man now known as "the father of naval architecture". Euler subsequently won this coveted

annual prize twelve times in his career.

[7]

St. Petersburg

Around this time Johann Bernoulli's two sons, Daniel and Nicolas, were working at the Imperial Russian Academy

of Sciences in St Petersburg. On July 10, 1726, Nicolas died of appendicitis after spending a year in Russia, and

when Daniel assumed his brother's position in the mathematics/physics division, he recommended that the post in

physiology that he had vacated be filled by his friend Euler. In November 1726 Euler eagerly accepted the offer, but

delayed making the trip to St Petersburg while he unsuccessfully applied for a physics professorship at the

University of Basel.

[8]

1957 stamp of the former Soviet Union

commemorating the 250th birthday of Euler. The

text says: 250 years from the birth of the great

mathematician, academician Leonhard Euler.

Euler arrived in the Russian capital on 17 May 1727. He was promoted

from his junior post in the medical department of the academy to a

position in the mathematics department. He lodged with Daniel

Bernoulli with whom he often worked in close collaboration. Euler

mastered Russian and settled into life in St Petersburg. He also took on

an additional job as a medic in the Russian Navy.

[9]

The Academy at St. Petersburg, established by Peter the Great, was

intended to improve education in Russia and to close the scientific gap

with Western Europe. As a result, it was made especially attractive to

foreign scholars like Euler. The academy possessed ample financial

resources and a comprehensive library drawn from the private libraries

Leonhard Euler

200

of Peter himself and of the nobility. Very few students were enrolled in the academy in order to lessen the faculty's

teaching burden, and the academy emphasized research and offered to its faculty both the time and the freedom to

pursue scientific questions.

[7]

The Academy's benefactress, Catherine I, who had continued the progressive policies of her late husband, died on

the day of Euler's arrival. The Russian nobility then gained power upon the ascension of the twelve-year-old Peter II.

The nobility were suspicious of the academy's foreign scientists, and thus cut funding and caused other difficulties

for Euler and his colleagues.

Conditions improved slightly upon the death of Peter II, and Euler swiftly rose through the ranks in the academy and

was made professor of physics in 1731. Two years later, Daniel Bernoulli, who was fed up with the censorship and

hostility he faced at St. Petersburg, left for Basel. Euler succeeded him as the head of the mathematics

department.

[10]

On 7 January 1734, he married Katharina Gsell (17071773), a daughter of Georg Gsell, a painter from the

Academy Gymnasium.

[11]

The young couple bought a house by the Neva River. Of their thirteen children, only five

survived childhood.

[12]

Berlin

Stamp of the former German Democratic

Republic honoring Euler on the 200th anniversary

of his death. In the middle, it shows his

polyhedral formula .

Concerned about the continuing turmoil in Russia, Euler left St.

Petersburg on 19 June 1741 to take up a post at the Berlin Academy,

which he had been offered by Frederick the Great of Prussia. He lived

for twenty-five years in Berlin, where he wrote over 380 articles. In

Berlin, he published the two works which he would be most renowned

for: the Introductio in analysin infinitorum, a text on functions

published in 1748, and the Institutiones calculi differentialis,

[13]

published in 1755 on differential calculus.

[14]

In 1755, he was elected a

foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

In addition, Euler was asked to tutor the Princess of Anhalt-Dessau,

Frederick's niece. Euler wrote over 200 letters to her in the early 1760s,

which were later compiled into a best-selling volume entitled Letters of Euler on different Subjects in Natural

Philosophy Addressed to a German Princess. This work contained Euler's exposition on various subjects pertaining

to physics and mathematics, as well as offering valuable insights into Euler's personality and religious beliefs. This

book became more widely read than any of his mathematical works, and it was published across Europe and in the

United States. The popularity of the 'Letters' testifies to Euler's ability to communicate scientific matters effectively

to a lay audience, a rare ability for a dedicated research scientist.

[14]

Despite Euler's immense contribution to the Academy's prestige, he was eventually forced to leave Berlin. This was

partly because of a conflict of personality with Frederick, who came to regard Euler as unsophisticated, especially in

comparison to the circle of philosophers the German king brought to the Academy. Voltaire was among those in

Frederick's employ, and the Frenchman enjoyed a prominent position in the king's social circle. Euler, a simple

religious man and a hard worker, was very conventional in his beliefs and tastes. He was in many ways the direct

opposite of Voltaire. Euler had limited training in rhetoric, and tended to debate matters that he knew little about,

making him a frequent target of Voltaire's wit.

[14]

Frederick also expressed disappointment with Euler's practical

engineering abilities:

I wanted to have a water jet in my garden: Euler calculated the force of the wheels necessary to raise the water

to a reservoir, from where it should fall back through channels, finally spurting out in Sanssouci. My mill was

carried out geometrically and could not raise a mouthful of water closer than fifty paces to the reservoir.

Vanity of vanities! Vanity of geometry!

[15]

Leonhard Euler

201

A 1753 portrait by Emanuel Handmann. This

portrayal suggests problems of the right eyelid,

and possible strabismus. The left eye, which here

appears healthy, was later affected by a

cataract.

[16]

Eyesight deterioration

Euler's eyesight worsened throughout his mathematical career. Three

years after suffering a near-fatal fever in 1735 he became nearly blind

in his right eye, but Euler rather blamed his condition on the

painstaking work on cartography he performed for the St. Petersburg

Academy. Euler's sight in that eye worsened throughout his stay in

Germany, so much so that Frederick referred to him as "Cyclops".

Euler later suffered a cataract in his good left eye, rendering him

almost totally blind a few weeks after its discovery in 1766. Even so,

his condition appeared to have little effect on his productivity, as he

compensated for it with his mental calculation skills and photographic

memory. For example, Euler could repeat the Aeneid of Virgil from

beginning to end without hesitation, and for every page in the edition

he could indicate which line was the first and which the last. With the

aid of his scribes, Euler's productivity on many areas of study actually

increased. He produced on average one mathematical paper every week

in the year 1775.

[3]

Return to Russia

The situation in Russia had improved greatly since the accession to the throne of Catherine the Great, and in 1766

Euler accepted an invitation to return to the St. Petersburg Academy and spent the rest of his life in Russia. His

second stay in the country was marred by tragedy. A fire in St. Petersburg in 1771 cost him his home, and almost his

life. In 1773, he lost his wife Katharina after 40 years of marriage. Three years after his wife's death, Euler married

her half-sister, Salome Abigail Gsell (17231794).

[17]

This marriage lasted until his death.

In St. Petersburg on 18 September 1783, after a lunch with his family, during a conversation with a fellow

academician Anders Johan Lexell about the newly discovered Uranus and its orbit, Euler suffered a brain

hemorrhage and died a few hours later.

[18]

A short obituary for the Russian Academy of Sciences was written by

Jacob von Staehlin-Storcksburg and a more detailed eulogy

[19]

was written and delivered at a memorial meeting by

Russian mathematician Nicolas Fuss, one of Euler's disciples. In the eulogy written for the French Academy by the

French mathematician and philosopher Marquis de Condorcet, he commented,

...il cessa de calculer et de vivre... he ceased to calculate and to live.

[20]

He was buried next to Katharina at the Smolensk Lutheran Cemetery on Vasilievsky Island. In 1785, the Russian

Academy of Sciences put a marble bust of Leonhard Euler on a pedestal next to the Director's seat and, in 1837,

placed a headstone on Euler's grave. To commemorate the 250th anniversary of Euler's birth, the headstone was

moved in 1956, together with his remains, to the 18th-century necropolis at the Alexander Nevsky Monastery.

[21]

Euler's grave at the Alexander Nevsky Monastery

Leonhard Euler

202

Contributions to mathematics and physics

Part of a series of articles on

The mathematical constant e

Natural logarithm Exponential function

Applications in: compound interest Euler's identity & Euler's formula half-lives & exponential growth/decay

Defining e: proof that e is irrational representations of e LindemannWeierstrass theorem

People John Napier Leonhard Euler

Schanuel's conjecture

Euler worked in almost all areas of mathematics: geometry, infinitesimal calculus, trigonometry, algebra, and

number theory, as well as continuum physics, lunar theory and other areas of physics. He is a seminal figure in the

history of mathematics; if printed, his works, many of which are of fundamental interest, would occupy between 60

and 80 quarto volumes.

[3]

Euler's name is associated with a large number of topics.

Euler is the only mathematician to have two numbers named after him: the immensely important Euler's Number in

calculus, e, approximately equal to 2.71828, and the Euler-Mascheroni Constant (gamma) sometimes referred to as

just "Euler's constant", approximately equal to 0.57721. It is not known whether is rational or irrational.

[22]

Mathematical notation

Euler introduced and popularized several notational conventions through his numerous and widely circulated

textbooks. Most notably, he introduced the concept of a function

[2]

and was the first to write f(x) to denote the

function f applied to the argument x. He also introduced the modern notation for the trigonometric functions, the

letter e for the base of the natural logarithm (now also known as Euler's number), the Greek letter for summations

and the letter i to denote the imaginary unit.

[23]

The use of the Greek letter to denote the ratio of a circle's

circumference to its diameter was also popularized by Euler, although it did not originate with him.

[24]

Analysis

The development of infinitesimal calculus was at the forefront of 18th Century mathematical research, and the

Bernoullisfamily friends of Euler were responsible for much of the early progress in the field. Thanks to their

influence, studying calculus became the major focus of Euler's work. While some of Euler's proofs are not acceptable

by modern standards of mathematical rigour

[25]

(in particular his reliance on the principle of the generality of

algebra), his ideas led to many great advances. Euler is well known in analysis for his frequent use and development

of power series, the expression of functions as sums of infinitely many terms, such as

Notably, Euler directly proved the power series expansions for e and the inverse tangent function. (Indirect proof via

the inverse power series technique was given by Newton and Leibniz between 1670 and 1680.) His daring use of

Leonhard Euler

203

power series enabled him to solve the famous Basel problem in 1735 (he provided a more elaborate argument in

1741):

[25]

A geometric interpretation of Euler's formula

Euler introduced the use of the exponential function and logarithms in

analytic proofs. He discovered ways to express various logarithmic

functions using power series, and he successfully defined logarithms

for negative and complex numbers, thus greatly expanding the scope of

mathematical applications of logarithms.

[23]

He also defined the

exponential function for complex numbers, and discovered its relation

to the trigonometric functions. For any real number , Euler's formula

states that the complex exponential function satisfies

A special case of the above formula is known as Euler's identity,

called "the most remarkable formula in mathematics" by Richard P.

Feynman, for its single uses of the notions of addition, multiplication, exponentiation, and equality, and the single

uses of the important constants 0, 1, e, i and .

[26]

In 1988, readers of the Mathematical Intelligencer voted it "the

Most Beautiful Mathematical Formula Ever".

[27]

In total, Euler was responsible for three of the top five formulae in

that poll.

[27]

De Moivre's formula is a direct consequence of Euler's formula.

In addition, Euler elaborated the theory of higher transcendental functions by introducing the gamma function and

introduced a new method for solving quartic equations. He also found a way to calculate integrals with complex

limits, foreshadowing the development of modern complex analysis. He also invented the calculus of variations

including its best-known result, the EulerLagrange equation.

Euler also pioneered the use of analytic methods to solve number theory problems. In doing so, he united two

disparate branches of mathematics and introduced a new field of study, analytic number theory. In breaking ground

for this new field, Euler created the theory of hypergeometric series, q-series, hyperbolic trigonometric functions and

the analytic theory of continued fractions. For example, he proved the infinitude of primes using the divergence of

the harmonic series, and he used analytic methods to gain some understanding of the way prime numbers are

distributed. Euler's work in this area led to the development of the prime number theorem.

[28]

Number theory

Euler's interest in number theory can be traced to the influence of Christian Goldbach, his friend in the St. Petersburg

Academy. A lot of Euler's early work on number theory was based on the works of Pierre de Fermat. Euler

developed some of Fermat's ideas, and disproved some of his conjectures.

Euler linked the nature of prime distribution with ideas in analysis. He proved that the sum of the reciprocals of the

primes diverges. In doing so, he discovered the connection between the Riemann zeta function and the prime

numbers; this is known as the Euler product formula for the Riemann zeta function.

Euler proved Newton's identities, Fermat's little theorem, Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares, and he made

distinct contributions to Lagrange's four-square theorem. He also invented the totient function (n) which is the

number of positive integers less than or equal to the integer n that are coprime to n. Using properties of this function,

he generalized Fermat's little theorem to what is now known as Euler's theorem. He contributed significantly to the

theory of perfect numbers, which had fascinated mathematicians since Euclid. Euler also conjectured the law of

Leonhard Euler

204

quadratic reciprocity. The concept is regarded as a fundamental theorem of number theory, and his ideas paved the

way for the work of Carl Friedrich Gauss.

[29]

By 1772 Euler had proved that 2

31

1 = 2,147,483,647 is a Mersenne prime. It may have remained the largest

known prime until 1867.

[30]

Graph theory

Map of Knigsberg in Euler's time showing the

actual layout of the seven bridges, highlighting

the river Pregel and the bridges.

In 1736, Euler solved the problem known as the Seven Bridges of

Knigsberg.

[31]

The city of Knigsberg, Prussia was set on the Pregel

River, and included two large islands which were connected to each

other and the mainland by seven bridges. The problem is to decide

whether it is possible to follow a path that crosses each bridge exactly

once and returns to the starting point. It is not possible: there is no

Eulerian circuit. This solution is considered to be the first theorem of

graph theory, specifically of planar graph theory.

[31]

Euler also discovered the formula VE+F=2 relating the number of

vertices, edges, and faces of a convex polyhedron,

[32]

and hence of a

planar graph. The constant in this formula is now known as the Euler

characteristic for the graph (or other mathematical object), and is

related to the genus of the object.

[33]

The study and generalization of this formula, specifically by Cauchy

[34]

and

L'Huillier,

[35]

is at the origin of topology.

Applied mathematics

Some of Euler's greatest successes were in solving real-world problems analytically, and in describing numerous

applications of the Bernoulli numbers, Fourier series, Venn diagrams, Euler numbers, the constants e and ,

continued fractions and integrals. He integrated Leibniz's differential calculus with Newton's Method of Fluxions,

and developed tools that made it easier to apply calculus to physical problems. He made great strides in improving

the numerical approximation of integrals, inventing what are now known as the Euler approximations. The most

notable of these approximations are Euler's method and the EulerMaclaurin formula. He also facilitated the use of

differential equations, in particular introducing the EulerMascheroni constant:

One of Euler's more unusual interests was the application of mathematical ideas in music. In 1739 he wrote the

Tentamen novae theoriae musicae, hoping to eventually incorporate musical theory as part of mathematics. This part

of his work, however, did not receive wide attention and was once described as too mathematical for musicians and

too musical for mathematicians.

[36]

Physics and astronomy

Euler helped develop the EulerBernoulli beam equation, which became a cornerstone of engineering. Aside from

successfully applying his analytic tools to problems in classical mechanics, Euler also applied these techniques to

celestial problems. His work in astronomy was recognized by a number of Paris Academy Prizes over the course of

his career. His accomplishments include determining with great accuracy the orbits of comets and other celestial

bodies, understanding the nature of comets, and calculating the parallax of the sun. His calculations also contributed

to the development of accurate longitude tables.

[37]

In addition, Euler made important contributions in optics. He disagreed with Newton's corpuscular theory of light in

the Opticks, which was then the prevailing theory. His 1740s papers on optics helped ensure that the wave theory of

Leonhard Euler

205

light proposed by Christian Huygens would become the dominant mode of thought, at least until the development of

the quantum theory of light.

[38]

In 1757 he published an important set of equations for inviscid flow, that are now known as the Euler equations.

Logic

Euler is also credited with using closed curves to illustrate syllogistic reasoning (1768). These diagrams have

become known as Euler diagrams.

[39]

Personal philosophy and religious beliefs

Euler and his friend Daniel Bernoulli were opponents of Leibniz's monadism and the philosophy of Christian Wolff.

Euler insisted that knowledge is founded in part on the basis of precise quantitative laws, something that monadism

and Wolffian science were unable to provide. Euler's religious leanings might also have had a bearing on his dislike

of the doctrine; he went so far as to label Wolff's ideas as "heathen and atheistic".

[40]

Much of what is known of Euler's religious beliefs can be deduced from his Letters to a German Princess and an

earlier work, Rettung der Gttlichen Offenbahrung Gegen die Einwrfe der Freygeister (Defense of the Divine

Revelation against the Objections of the Freethinkers). These works show that Euler was a devout Christian who

believed the Bible to be inspired; the Rettung was primarily an argument for the divine inspiration of scripture.

[41]

There is a famous legend,

[42]

inspired by Euler's arguments with secular philosophers over religion, which is set

during Euler's second stint at the St. Petersburg academy. The French philosopher Denis Diderot was visiting Russia

on Catherine the Great's invitation. However, the Empress was alarmed that the philosopher's atheism was

influencing members of her court, and so Euler was asked to confront the Frenchman. Diderot was later informed

that a learned mathematician had produced a proof of the existence of God: he agreed to view the proof as it was

presented in court. Diderot, to whom (says the legend

[43]

) all mathematics was supposed to be gibberish, would

stand dumbstruck as peals of laughter would have erupted from the court.

Leonhard Euler

206

Commemorations

Euler was featured on the sixth series of the Swiss 10-franc banknote and on numerous Swiss, German, and Russian

postage stamps. The asteroid 2002 Euler was named in his honor. He is also commemorated by the Lutheran Church

on their Calendar of Saints on 24 Mayhe was a devout Christian (and believer in biblical inerrancy) who wrote

apologetics and argued forcefully against the prominent atheists of his time.

[41]

Selected bibliography

The title page of Euler's Methodus inveniendi

lineas curvas.

Euler has an extensive bibliography. His best known books include:

Elements of Algebra. This elementary algebra text starts with a

discussion of the nature of numbers and gives a comprehensive

introduction to algebra, including formulae for solutions of

polynomial equations.

Introductio in analysin infinitorum (1748). English translation

Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite by John Blanton (Book I,

ISBN 0-387-96824-5, Springer-Verlag 1988; Book II, ISBN

0-387-97132-7, Springer-Verlag 1989).

Two influential textbooks on calculus: Institutiones calculi

differentialis (1755) and Institutionum calculi integralis

(17681770).

Lettres une Princesse d'Allemagne (Letters to a German Princess)

(17681772). Available online

[44]

(in French). English translation,

with notes, and a life of Euler, available online from Google Books:

Volume 1

[45]

, Volume 2

[46]

Methodus inveniendi lineas curvas maximi minimive proprietate

gaudentes, sive solutio problematis isoperimetrici latissimo sensu

accepti (1744). The Latin title translates as a method for finding curved lines enjoying properties of maximum or

minimum, or solution of isoperimetric problems in the broadest accepted sense.

[47]

A definitive collection of Euler's works, entitled Opera Omnia, has been published since 1911 by the Euler

Commission of the Swiss Academy of Sciences. A complete chronological list of Euler's works is available at the

following page: The Enestrm Index

[48]

(PDF).

References and notes

[1] The pronunciation /julr/ is incorrect. "Euler", Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, Oxford University Press, 1989 "Euler" (http:/ /

www.merriam-webster. com/ dictionary/ Euler), MerriamWebster's Online Dictionary, 2009. "Euler, Leonhard" (http:/ / www. bartleby.

com/ 61/ 71/ E0237100.html), The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, fourth edition, Houghton Mifflin Company,

Boston, 2000. Peter M. Higgins (2007). Nets, Puzzles, and Postmen: An Exploration of Mathematical Connections. Oxford University Press.

p.43.

[2] Dunham, William (1999). Euler: The Master of Us All. The Mathematical Association of America. p.17.

[3] Finkel, B.F. (1897). "Biography- Leonard Euler". The American Mathematical Monthly 4 (12): 297302. doi:10.2307/2968971.

JSTOR2968971.

[4] Dunham, William (1999). Euler: The Master of Us All. The Mathematical Association of America. xiii. "Lisez Euler, lisez Euler, c'est notre

matre tous."

[5] James, Ioan (2002). Remarkable Mathematicians: From Euler to von Neumann. Cambridge. p.2. ISBN0-521-52094-0.

[6] Euler's Dissertation De Sono : E002. Translated & Annotated by Ian Bruce (http:/ / www. 17centurymaths. com/ contents/ euler/ e002tr. pdf).

(PDF) . 17centurymaths.com. Retrieved on 2011-09-14.

[7] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 156.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

Leonhard Euler

207

[8] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 125.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

[9] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 127.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

[10] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 128129.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

[11] Gekker, I.R.; Euler, A.A. (2007). "Leonhard Euler's family and descendants". In Bogoliubov, N.N.; Mikhalov, G.K.; Yushkevich, A.P..

Euler and modern science. Mathematical Association of America. ISBN0-88385-564-X., p. 402.

[12] Fuss, Nicolas. "Eulogy of Euler by Fuss" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-and. ac. uk/ ~history/ Extras/ Euler_Fuss_Eulogy. html). . Retrieved

30 August 2006.

[13] "E212 Institutiones calculi differentialis cum eius usu in analysi finitorum ac doctrina serierum" (http:/ / www. math. dartmouth. edu/

~euler/ pages/ E212. html). Dartmouth. .

[14] Dunham, William (1999). Euler: The Master of Us All. The Mathematical Association of America. xxivxxv.

[15] Frederick II of Prussia (1927). Letters of Voltaire and Frederick the Great, Letter H 7434, 25 January 1778. Richard Aldington. New York:

Brentano's.

[16] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 154155.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

[17] Gekker, I.R.; Euler, A.A. (2007). "Leonhard Euler's family and descendants". In Bogoliubov, N.N.; Mikhalov, G.K.; Yushkevich, A.P..

Euler and modern science. Mathematical Association of America. ISBN0-88385-564-X., p. 405.

[18] A. Ya. Yakovlev (1983). Leonhard Euler. M.: Prosvesheniye.

[19] "Eloge de M. Leonhard Euler. Par M. Fuss". Nova Acta Academia Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 1: 159212. 1783.

[20] Marquis de Condorcet. "Eulogy of Euler Condorcet" (http:/ / www. math. dartmouth. edu/ ~euler/ historica/ condorcet. html). . Retrieved

30 August 2006.

[21] Leonhard Euler (http:/ / www. findagrave. com/ cgi-bin/ fg. cgi?page=gr& GRid=15567379) at Find a Grave

[22] Derbyshire, John (2003). Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics. Washington, D.C.:

Joseph Henry Press. pp.422.

[23] Boyer, Carl B.; Uta C. Merzbach (1991). A History of Mathematics. John Wiley & Sons. pp.439445. ISBN0-471-54397-7.

[24] Wolfram, Stephen. "Mathematical Notation: Past and Future" (http:/ / www. stephenwolfram. com/ publications/ talks/ mathml/ mathml2.

html). . Retrieved August 2006.

[25] Wanner, Gerhard; Harrier, Ernst (March 2005). Analysis by its history (1st ed.). Springer. p.62.

[26] Feynman, Richard (June 1970). "Chapter 22: Algebra". The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Volume I. p.10.

[27] Wells, David (1990). "Are these the most beautiful?". Mathematical Intelligencer 12 (3): 3741. doi:10.1007/BF03024015.

Wells, David (1988). "Which is the most beautiful?". Mathematical Intelligencer 10 (4): 3031. doi:10.1007/BF03023741.

See also: Peterson, Ivars. "The Mathematical Tourist" (http:/ / www. maa. org/ mathtourist/ mathtourist_03_12_07. html). . Retrieved March

2008.

[28] Dunham, William (1999). "3,4". Euler: The Master of Us All. The Mathematical Association of America.

[29] Dunham, William (1999). "1,4". Euler: The Master of Us All. The Mathematical Association of America.

[30] Caldwell, Chris. The largest known prime by year (http:/ / primes. utm. edu/ notes/ by_year. html)

[31] Alexanderson, Gerald (July 2006). "Euler and Knigsberg's bridges: a historical view". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 43

(4): 567. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01130-X.

[32] Peter R. Cromwell (1997). Polyhedra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.189190.

[33] Alan Gibbons (1985). Algorithmic Graph Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.72.

[34] Cauchy, A.L. (1813). "Recherche sur les polydrespremier mmoire". Journal de l'cole Polytechnique 9 (Cahier 16): 6686.

[35] L'Huillier, S.-A.-J. (1861). "Mmoire sur la polydromtrie". Annales de Mathmatiques 3: 169189.

[36] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 144145.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

[37] Youschkevitch, A P; Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 19701990).

[38] Home, R.W. (1988). "Leonhard Euler's 'Anti-Newtonian' Theory of Light". Annals of Science 45 (5): 521533.

doi:10.1080/00033798800200371.

[39] [39] Baron, M. E.; A Note on The Historical Development of Logic Diagrams. The Mathematical Gazette: The Journal of the Mathematical

Association. Vol LIII, no. 383 May 1969.

[40] Calinger, Ronald (1996). "Leonhard Euler: The First St. Petersburg Years (17271741)". Historia Mathematica 23 (2): 153154.

doi:10.1006/hmat.1996.0015.

[41] Euler, Leonhard (1960). Orell-Fussli. ed. "Rettung der Gttlichen Offenbahrung Gegen die Einwrfe der Freygeister". Leonhardi Euleri

Opera Omnia (series 3) 12.

[42] Brown, B.H. (May 1942). "The Euler-Diderot Anecdote". The American Mathematical Monthly 49 (5): 302303. doi:10.2307/2303096.

JSTOR2303096.; Gillings, R.J. (February 1954). "The So-Called Euler-Diderot Incident". The American Mathematical Monthly 61 (2):

7780. doi:10.2307/2307789. JSTOR2307789.

Leonhard Euler

208

[43] Marty, Jacques. "Quelques aspects des travaux de Diderot en Mathematiques Mixtes." (http:/ / www. persee. fr/ web/ revues/ home/

prescript/ article/ rde_0769-0886_1988_num_4_1_954). .

[44] http:/ / perso. club-internet. fr/ nielrowclub-internet. fr/ nielrowbooks/ euler. tif

[45] http:/ / books. google. com/ books?vid=09-Fi9xi6pUzqBOnQzlnRS& id=hAm5VsEeu1EC& printsec=titlepage& dq=%22Leonhard+

Euler%22

[46] http:/ / books. google. com/ books?vid=OCLC00826569& id=CZLPNtEnFRcC& printsec=titlepage& dq=%22Leonhard+ Euler%22

[47] E65 Methodus... entry at Euler Archives (http:/ / math. dartmouth. edu/ ~euler/ pages/ E065. html). Math.dartmouth.edu. Retrieved on

2011-09-14.

[48] http:/ / www.math. dartmouth.edu/ ~euler/ docs/ translations/ enestrom/ Enestrom_Index. pdf

Further reading

Lexikon der Naturwissenschaftler, (2000), Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

Bogolyubov, Mikhailov, and Yushkevich, (2007), Euler and Modern Science, Mathematical Association of

America. ISBN 0-88385-564-X. Translated by Robert Burns.

Bradley, Robert E., D'Antonio, Lawrence A., and C. Edward Sandifer (2007), Euler at 300: An Appreciation,

Mathematical Association of America. ISBN 0-88385-565-8

Demidov, S.S., (2005), "Treatise on the differential calculus" in Grattan-Guinness, I., ed., Landmark Writings in

Western Mathematics. Elsevier: 19198.

Dunham, William (1999) Euler: The Master of Us All, Washington: Mathematical Association of America. ISBN

0-88385-328-0

Dunham, William (2007), The Genius of Euler: Reflections on his Life and Work, Mathematical Association of

America. ISBN 0-88385-558-5

Fraser, Craig G., (2005), "Leonhard Euler's 1744 book on the calculus of variations" in Grattan-Guinness, I., ed.,

Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics. Elsevier: 16880.

Gladyshev, Georgi, P. (2007), " Leonhard Eulers methods and ideas live on in the thermodynamic hierarchical

theory of biological evolution, (http:/ / ceser. in/ ceserp/ index. php/ ijamas/ article/ view/ 1014)" International

Journal of Applied Mathematics & Statistics (IJAMAS) 11 (N07), Special Issue on Leonhard Paul Eulers:

Mathematical Topics and Applications (M. T. A.).

Gautschi, Walter (2008). "Leonhard Euler: his life, the man, and his works" (http:/ / www. cs. purdue. edu/

homes/ wxg/ EulerLect. pdf). SIAM Review 50 (1): 333. Bibcode2008SIAMR..50....3G.

doi:10.1137/070702710.

Heimpell, Hermann, Theodor Heuss, Benno Reifenberg (editors). 1956. Die groen Deutschen, volume 2, Berlin:

Ullstein Verlag.

Krus, D.J. (2001). "Is the normal distribution due to Gauss? Euler, his family of gamma functions, and their place

in the history of statistics" (http:/ / www. visualstatistics. net/ Statistics/ Euler/ Euler. htm). Quality and Quantity:

International Journal of Methodology 35: 44546.

Nahin, Paul (2006), Dr. Euler's Fabulous Formula, New Jersey: Princeton, ISBN 978-0-691-11822-2

du Pasquier, Louis-Gustave, (2008) Leonhard Euler And His Friends, CreateSpace, ISBN 1-4348-3327-5.

Translated by John S.D. Glaus.

Reich, Karin, (2005), " 'Introduction' to analysis" in Grattan-Guinness, I., ed., Landmark Writings in Western

Mathematics. Elsevier: 18190.

Richeson, David S. (2008), Euler's Gem: The Polyhedron Formula and the Birth of Topology. Princeton

University Press.

Sandifer, Edward C. (2007), The Early Mathematics of Leonhard Euler, Mathematical Association of America.

ISBN 0-88385-559-3

Sandifer, Edward C. (2007), How Euler Did It, Mathematical Association of America. ISBN 0-88385-563-1

Simmons, J. (1996) The giant book of scientists: The 100 greatest minds of all time, Sydney: The Book Company.

Singh, Simon. (1997). Fermat's last theorem, Fourth Estate: New York, ISBN 1-85702-669-1

Leonhard Euler

209

Thiele, Rdiger. (2005). The mathematics and science of Leonhard Euler, in Mathematics and the Historian's

Craft: The Kenneth O. May Lectures, G. Van Brummelen and M. Kinyon (eds.), CMS Books in Mathematics,

Springer Verlag. ISBN 0-387-25284-3.

"A Tribute to Leohnard Euler 17071783". Mathematics Magazine 56 (5). November 1983.

External links

LeonhardEuler.com (http:/ / www. leonhardeuler. com/ )

Weisstein, Eric W., Euler, Leonhard (17071783) (http:/ / scienceworld. wolfram. com/ biography/ Euler. html)

from ScienceWorld.

Encyclopdia Britannica article (http:/ / www. britannica. com/ eb/ article-9033216/ Leonhard-Euler)

Leonhard Euler (http:/ / genealogy. math. ndsu. nodak. edu/ id. php?id=38586) at the Mathematics Genealogy

Project

How Euler did it (http:/ / www. maa. org/ news/ howeulerdidit. html) contains columns explaining how Euler

solved various problems

Euler Archive (http:/ / www. eulerarchive. org/ )

Leonhard Euler uvres compltes (http:/ / portail. mathdoc. fr/ cgi-bin/ oetoc?id=OE_EULER_1_2)

Gallica-Math

Euler Committee of the Swiss Academy of Sciences (http:/ / www. leonhard-euler. ch/ )

References for Leonhard Euler (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/ References/ Euler. html)

Euler Tercentenary 2007 (http:/ / www. euler-2007. ch/ en/ index. htm)

The Euler Society (http:/ / www. eulersociety. org/ )

Leonhard Euler Congress 2007 (http:/ / www. pdmi. ras. ru/ EIMI/ 2007/ AG/ )St. Petersburg, Russia

Project Euler (http:/ / www. projecteuler. net)

Euler Family Tree (http:/ / www. math. dartmouth. edu/ ~euler/ historica/ family-tree. html)

Euler's Correspondence with Frederick the Great, King of Prussia (http:/ / friedrich. uni-trier. de/ oeuvres/ 20/

219/ )

"Euler 300th anniversary lecture" (http:/ / www. gresham. ac. uk/ event. asp?PageId=45& EventId=518), given

by Robin Wilson at Gresham College, 9 May 2007 (can download as video or audio files)

O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Leonhard Euler" (http:/ / www-history. mcs. st-andrews. ac. uk/

Biographies/ Euler. html), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

Euler Quartic Conjecture (http:/ / euler413. narod. ru/ )

Joseph Louis Lagrange

210

Joseph Louis Lagrange

Joseph-Louis Lagrange

Joseph-Louis (Giuseppe Luigi),

comte de Lagrange

Born Giuseppe Luigi Lagrancia

25 January 1736

Turin, Piedmont-Sardinia

Died 10 April 1813 (aged77)

Paris, France

Residence Piedmont

France

Prussia

Citizenship Kingdom of Sardinia

France

Nationality Italian

French

Fields Mathematics

Mathematical physics

Institutions cole Polytechnique

Doctoral advisor Leonhard Euler

Doctoral students Joseph Fourier

Giovanni Plana

Simon Poisson

Knownfor See list

Analytical mechanics

Celestial mechanics

Mathematical analysis

Number theory

Notes

Note he did not have a doctoral advisor but academic genealogy authorities link his intellectual heritage to Leonhard Euler, who played the

equivalent role.

Joseph-Louis Lagrange (25 January 1736 10 April 1813), born Giuseppe Luigi Lagrancia

[1]

(often known as

Giuseppe Luigi Lagrangia in the scientific literature)

[2]

was an Italian-born French mathematician and astronomer

born in Turin, Piedmont, who lived part of his life in Prussia and part in France.

[1]

He made significant contributions

to all fields of analysis, number theory, and classical and celestial mechanics. On the recommendation of Euler and

d'Alembert, in 1766 Lagrange succeeded Euler as the director of mathematics at the Prussian Academy of Sciences

in Berlin, where he stayed for over twenty years, producing a large body of work and winning several prizes of the

Joseph Louis Lagrange

211

French Academy of Sciences. Lagrange's treatise on analytical mechanics (Mcanique Analytique, 4. ed., 2 vols.

Paris: Gauthier-Villars et fils, 188889), written in Berlin and first published in 1788, offered the most

comprehensive treatment of classical mechanics since Newton and formed a basis for the development of

mathematical physics in the nineteenth century.

Lagrange's parents were Italian, although his paternal great grandfather was French. In 1787, at age 51, he moved

from Berlin to France and became a member of the French Academy. He remained in France until the end of his life.

Therefore, Lagrange is alternatively considered a French and an Italian scientist. Lagrange survived the French

Revolution and became the first professor of analysis at the cole Polytechnique upon its opening in 1794. Lagrange

was appointed Senator in 1799, and Napoleon named him to the Legion of Honour in 1803 and made him a Count of

the Empire in 1808.

[1]

He is buried in the Panthon and his name appears as one of the 72 names inscribed on the

Eiffel Tower.

Scientific contribution

Lagrange was one of the creators of the calculus of variations, deriving the EulerLagrange equations for extrema of

functionals. He also extended the method to take into account possible constraints, arriving at the method of

Lagrange multipliers. Lagrange invented the method of solving differential equations known as variation of

parameters, applied differential calculus to the theory of probabilities and attained notable work on the solution of

equations. He proved that every natural number is a sum of four squares. His treatise Theorie des fonctions

analytiques laid some of the foundations of group theory, anticipating Galois. In calculus, Lagrange developed a

novel approach to interpolation and Taylor series. He studied the three-body problem for the Earth, Sun and Moon

(1764) and the movement of Jupiters satellites (1766), and in 1772 found the special-case solutions to this problem

that yield what are now known as Lagrangian points. But above all he impressed on mechanics, having transformed

Newtonian mechanics into a branch of analysis, Lagrangian mechanics as it is now called, and exhibited the

so-called mechanical "principles" as simple results of the variational calculus.

Biography

Early years

Lagrange was born of French and Italian descent (a paternal great grandfather was a French army officer who then

moved to Turin),

[3]

as Giuseppe Lodovico Lagrangia in Turin. His father, who had charge of the Kingdom of

Sardinia's military chest, was of good social position and wealthy, but before his son grew up he had lost most of his

property in speculations, and young Lagrange had to rely on his own abilities for his position. He was raised as a

Roman Catholic, though later on, he became an agnostic.

[4]

He was educated at the college of Turin, but it was not

until he was seventeen that he showed any taste for mathematics his interest in the subject being first excited by a

paper by Edmund Halley which he came across by accident. Alone and unaided he threw himself into mathematical

studies; at the end of a year's incessant toil he was already an accomplished mathematician, and was made a lecturer

in the artillery school.

Variational calculus

Lagrange is one of the founders of the calculus of variations. Starting in 1754, he worked on the problem of

tautochrone, discovering a method of maximizing and minimizing functionals in a way similar to finding extrema of

functions. Lagrange wrote several letters to Leonhard Euler between 1754 and 1756 describing his results. He

outlined his "-algorithm", leading to the EulerLagrange equations of variational calculus and considerably

simplifying Euler's earlier analysis.

[5]

Lagrange also applied his ideas to problems of classical mechanics,

generalizing the results of Euler and Maupertuis.

Joseph Louis Lagrange

212

Euler was very impressed with Lagrange's results. It has been stated that "with characteristic courtesy he withheld a

paper he had previously written, which covered some of the same ground, in order that the young Italian might have

time to complete his work, and claim the undisputed invention of the new calculus"; however, this chivalric view has

been disputed.

[6]

Lagrange published his method in two memoirs of the Turin Society in 1762 and 1773.

Miscellanea Taurinensia

In 1758, with the aid of his pupils, Lagrange established a society, which was subsequently incorporated as the Turin

Academy of Sciences, and most of his early writings are to be found in the five volumes of its transactions, usually

known as the Miscellanea Taurinensia. Many of these are elaborate papers. The first volume contains a paper on the

theory of the propagation of sound; in this he indicates a mistake made by Newton, obtains the general differential

equation for the motion, and integrates it for motion in a straight line. This volume also contains the complete

solution of the problem of a string vibrating transversely; in this paper he points out a lack of generality in the

solutions previously given by Brook Taylor, D'Alembert, and Euler, and arrives at the conclusion that the form of the

curve at any time t is given by the equation . The article concludes with a masterly

discussion of echoes, beats, and compound sounds. Other articles in this volume are on recurring series,

probabilities, and the calculus of variations.

The second volume contains a long paper embodying the results of several papers in the first volume on the theory

and notation of the calculus of variations; and he illustrates its use by deducing the principle of least action, and by

solutions of various problems in dynamics.

The third volume includes the solution of several dynamical problems by means of the calculus of variations; some

papers on the integral calculus; a solution of Fermat's problem mentioned above: given an integer n which is not a

perfect square, to find a number x such that x

2

n+1 is a perfect square; and the general differential equations of

motion for three bodies moving under their mutual attractions.

The next work he produced was in 1764 on the libration of the Moon, and an explanation as to why the same face

was always turned to the earth, a problem which he treated by the aid of virtual work. His solution is especially

interesting as containing the germ of the idea of generalized equations of motion, equations which he first formally

proved in 1780.

Berlin Academy

Already in 1756 Euler, with support from Maupertuis, made an attempt to bring Lagrange to the Berlin Academy.

Later, D'Alambert interceded on Lagrange's behalf with Frederick of Prussia and wrote to Lagrange asking him to

leave Turin for a considerably more prestigious position in Berlin. Lagrange turned down both offers, responding in

1765 that

It seems to me that Berlin would not be at all suitable for me while M.Euler is there.

In 1766 Euler left Berlin for Saint Petersburg, and Frederick wrote to Lagrange expressing the wish of "the greatest

king in Europe" to have "the greatest mathematician in Europe" resident at his court. Lagrange was finally persuaded

and he spent the next twenty years in Prussia, where he produced not only the long series of papers published in the

Berlin and Turin transactions, but his monumental work, the Mcanique analytique. His residence at Berlin

commenced with an unfortunate mistake. Finding most of his colleagues married, and assured by their wives that it

was the only way to be happy, he married; his wife soon died, but the union was not a happy one.

Lagrange was a favourite of the king, who used frequently to discourse to him on the advantages of perfect regularity

of life. The lesson went home, and thenceforth Lagrange studied his mind and body as though they were machines,

and found by experiment the exact amount of work which he was able to do without breaking dow