Sei sulla pagina 1di 12

Kaitlin Bisel

Dataset 1
School State Criterion-referenced Assessment Test Proficiency Percentages by Grade Level Over TimeGrade Six
Grade Six
Percentages
2006-07 (n=219)
2007-08 (n=233)
2008-09 (n=240)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=249)

Below Basic Basic


13%
28%
20%
15%
18%

2006-07 (n=219)
2007-08 (n=233)
2008-09 (n=240)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=249)

Below Basic Basic


29
66
47
38
45

Numbers

Grade Seven
Percentages
Below Basic Basic
2006-07 (n=226)
17%
2007-08 (n=238)
13%
2008-09 (n=218)
17%
2009-10 (n=242)
11%
2010-11 (n=232)
14%

Numbers

Below Basic Basic

27%
18%
29%
27%
31%

Proficient
Advanced
49%
10%
39%
15%
34%
18%
37%
21%
37%
14%

60
41
69
68
77

Proficient
Advanced
108
22
90
36
82
42
68
50
92
35

38%
32%
35%
38%
43%

Proficient
Advanced
35%
9%
47%
8%
39%
10%
42%
9%
38%
5%

Proficient

Advanced

Percentages

Grade Seven

Percentages

Grade Eight

Kaitlin Bisel

2006-07 (n=226)
2007-08 (n=238)
2008-09 (n=218)
2009-10 (n=242)
2010-11 (n=232)

38
30
37
28
32

87
77
77
93
100

80
112
85
99
88

21
19
19
22
12
Percentages

Grade Eight
Percentages
2006-07 (n=223)
2007-08 (n=214)
2008-09 (n=243)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=246)

Below Basic Basic


18%
15%
13%
15%
14%

36%
34%
38%
35%
49%

2006-07 (n=223)
2007-08 (n=214)
2008-09 (n=243)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=246)

Below Basic Basic


40
32
32
36
34

81
72
92
78
121

Numbers

Proficient
Advanced
34%
12%
41%
11%
47%
2%
39%
11%
30%
7%

Proficient
75
87
114
86
74

Advanced
27
23
5
24
17

Kaitlin Bisel

Years(number)Basic and BelowProficient and Advanced


Goal Met
2006-07 (n=219)
2007-08 (n=233)
2008-09 (n=240)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=249)

89
107
116
106
122

130
126
124
118
127

2006-07 (n=219)
2007-08 (n=233)
2008-09 (n=240)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=249)

41%
46%
48%
47%
49%

59%
54%
52%
53%
51%

de Seven
2006-07 (n=226)
2007-08 (n=238)
2008-09 (n=218)
2009-10 (n=242)
2010-11 (n=232)

125
107
114
121
132

2006-07 (n=226)
2007-08 (n=238)
2008-09 (n=218)
2009-10 (n=242)
2010-11 (n=232)

55%
45%
52%
50%
57%

Cohorts
One

Grade
sixth
seventh
eighth

Two

sixth
seventh
eighth

Three

sixth
seventh
eighth

Four

sixth
seventh

yes
yes
yes
yes
yes

101
131
104
121
100
45%
55% yes
48%
50% yes
43%

Kaitlin Bisel

2006-07 (n=223)
2007-08 (n=214)
2008-09 (n=243)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=246)

121

102

104

110

124

119

114

110

155

91

2006-07 (n=223)
2007-08 (n=214)
2008-09 (n=243)
2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=246)

54%

46%

49%

51% yes

51%

49%

51%

49%

47%

53% yes

Kaitlin Bisel

Years(number)Basic and BelowProficient and Advanced


Goal Met Data Organized For
2006-07 (n=219)
41%
59% yes
One
sixth
2007-08 (n=238)
45%
55% yes
seventh
2008-09 (n=243)
51%
49%
eighth

Chart
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09

2007-08 (n=233)
2008-09 (n=218)
2009-10 (n=224)

46%
52%
51%

54% yes
48%
49%

Two

sixth
seventh
eighth

2007-08
2008-09
2009-10

2008-09 (n=240)
2009-10 (n=242)
2010-11 (n=246)

48%
50%
47%

52% yes
50% yes
53%

Three

sixth
seventh
eighth

2008-09
2009-10
2010-11

2009-10 (n=224)
2010-11 (n=232)

47%
57%

53% yes
43%
Cohort
one
two
three

Kaitlin Bisel

Cohorts Proficient&Advan
70%

Percentage from Proficient and Advance

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
6th

Kaitlin Bisel

59%
55% One
49% Two
Three

54%
48%
49%
52%
50%
53%

Times Goal met


all
twice (6+8th)
once (8th)

6th

7th

59%
55%
49%

8th

54%
48%
49%

52%
50%
53%

Kaitlin Bisel

s Proficient&Advanced for Each Grade

One
Two
Three

7th

Grade Levels

8th

Kaitlin Bisel

Dataset 2
Building Assessment Results for a Common Assesment Given to All Students in the same Grade on the same Day
Student IDGender
1 M
2 M
3 F
4 M
5 M
6 F
7 M
8 M
9 M
10 M
11 M
12 F
13 M
14 M
15 F
16 M
17 M
18 F
19 M
20 M
21 F
22 F
23 M
24 M
25 F
26 M
27 F
28 M
29 M

Ethnicity
As
W
W
As
Hi
Hi
AA
W
As
W
W
W
AA
As
Hi
Hi
W
As
As
Hi
W
W
AA
AA
W
As
As
W
Hi

English Prof
Score
EP
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP

93
91
91
92
96
91
91
100
81
86
80
89
84
81
84
86
87
80
85
88
82
72
70
78
77
75
72
73
72

Teacher
B
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
B
A

Skill1
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
yes
no

Skill2
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
yes
no
no

Skill3
yes
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes

Kaitlin Bisel30

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

F
F
F
M
M
F
F
M
M
F
M
F
F
M
F
F
M
F
M
M
F

AA
AA
Hi
AA
W
W
W
Hi
Hi
Hi
Hi
W
W
AA
AA
As
W
Hi
Hi
AA
Hi

EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
LEP/EL
EP
EP
EP
LEP/EL
EP
LEP/EL
EP
LEP/EL
LEP/EL
LEP/EL
LEP/EL

73
78
71
72
70
78
70
72
77
74
74
74
77
61
69
64
67
60
59
54
50

B
A
A
A
B
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B

yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
yes

no
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no

yes
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
no
no
no
no
yes

Kaitlin Bisel

Below Basic
69 or less

Number
Percentage

Basic
70-79

8
16%

Basic or Below
Number
29
Percentage
58%

Proficient Advanced
80-89
90-100
21
13
8
42%
26%
16%

Proficient and Advanced


21
42%
Goal was not met

Ethnicity
number

basic

proficient percentage proficient

Kaitlin
AsianBisel

Hispanic
African American
White

67%

14

36%

10

20%

17

47%

50

Teacher
A
B

number

basic

proficient percentage proficient

23

13

10

44%

27

16

11

41%

goals not met

Percentage Proficient and


Advanced with Ethnicity

Percentage Proficient on Teacher


B

41%

Teachers

Ethnicity

White

African American
Hispanic

Series1

44%

Asian
0%
0%

20%

40%
Percentage

60%

80%

10%

20%

30%

Percentage Proficient

40%

50%

Series1

Potrebbero piacerti anche